DOCSLIB.ORG

Exploring the Cooperative Economy Report 2018 Report 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Exploring the Cooperative Economy Report 2018 Report 2018 EXPLORING THE COOPERATIVE ECONOMY REPORT 2018 REPORT 2018 EXPLORING THE COOPERATIVE ECONOMY www.monitor.coop Titolo capitolo 1 THE 2018 WORLD Bruno Roelants THE WORLD COOPERATIVE MONITOR IS AN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATIVE ALLIANCE INITIATIVE WITH THE SCIENTIFIC SUPPORT OF EURICSE COOPERATIVE MONITOR Gianluca Salvatori EXPLORING THE COOPERATIVE ECONOMY The International Cooperative Alliance (ICA) and the Euro- the report and encourage questionnaire submissions in Brazil, pean Research Institute on Cooperative and Social Enterpris- resulting in 63 questionnaires from Brazilian cooperatives. We MADE POSSIBLE BY THE SUPPORT OF OUR ORGANISATIONAL PARTNERS es (Euricse) present the seventh annual World Cooperative hope to see the total number of questionnaires rise from all Monitor report. This publication reports on the world’s larg- around the globe, which would greatly enhance the analysis we est cooperative and mutual organisations, providing rankings can provide about the cooperative movement. We encourage all of the Top 300 and sectorial analysis based on 2016 financial federations to continue to remind their members to participate data. actively in the World Cooperative Monitor call for data. This year’s results show the largest organisations in the We are also excited to present a new feature of the report: a cooperative movement performing well, with only slight vari- special analysis of the Top 300 and the United Nations’ Sustain- ations to the top positions across the sectors. In the Top 300 able Development Goals (SDGs). This new addition to the WCM ranking based on turnover the French Groupe Crédit Agricole report takes a look at how the largest cooperative enterpris- and Groupe BPCE place first and second respectively, with BVR es and mutuals in the world are moving towards achieving the of Germany ranking third. And in the Top 300 based on the ra- SDGs, examining documents reported to the UN Global Com- tio of turnover over gross domestic product (GDP) per capita pact project and Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). We are proud ranking, reintroduced this year, IFFCO from India holds the top to find many examples of cooperative and mutual enterprises position. The ratio of turnover over GDP is not intended to com- developing projects and initiatives to ensure fair labour, protect pute the contribution of each enterprise to the national GDP, the environment, and much more to meet the SDGs. Featured but rather to relate the turnover of the enterprise to the wealth within the section are also stories about the actions taken by of the country in which it operates, as GDP per capita meas- Grupo Sancor Seguros (Argentina), Metsä Group (Finland) and ures the purchasing power of an economy in an internationally Sicredi (Brazil), three of the Top 300. We also hear from one of comparable way. the world’s leaders in SDG development, adoption, and promo- We would like to give special thanks this year to our tion, Enrico Giovannini. FOR INFORMATION CONTACT ever-committed sponsors, OCB System and Fundación Es- Many thanks to all of the contributing enterprises and col- www.monitor.coop priu. OCB System made a particular effort this year to promote laborators who produced this year’s edition of the report! [email protected] 3 INDEX WCM 2018 6 2016 HIGHLIGHTS WCM database and key results 12 SECTOR SNAPSHOTS AND TRENDS Agriculture and Food Industries Industry and Utilities Wholesale and Retail Trade Insurance Cooperatives and Mutuals Banking and Financial Services Health, Education and Social Care Other services 42 TOP 300 AND SDGS Beyond Economic Impact: The Contribution of the Top 300 to Sustainable Development Interview with Enrico Giovannini Stories from Grupo Sancor Seguros, Metsä Group, Sicredi 62 METHODOLOGY Methodology and Data Sources 71 TOP 300: RANKINGS AND SDG PARTICIPATION Top 300 Rankings by Turnover in USD Top 300 Rankings by Turnover in International Dollars Top 300: SDG Participation 92 TEAM, STEERING COMMITTEE, ORGANISATIONAL PARTNERS The World Cooperative Monitor team and steering committee Promoters and Organisational partners EXPLORING THE COOPERATIVE ECONOMY REPORT 2018 2016 1855 418 293 9 ORGANISATIONS GROUPED BY TURNOVER BRACKET (USD) EUROPE AMERICAS ASIA - AFRICA HIGHLIGHTS PACIFIC 30-100 BLN 16 The World Cooperative Monitor 10-30 BLN 36 is a project designed to collect robust economic, organisational, 5-10 BLN 41 and social data about cooperatives, THE ORGANISATIONS IN THIS YEAR’S DATASET ARE DISTRIBUTED IN mutual organisations and non- 1-5 BLN 207 cooperative enterprises controlled THE WORLD COOPERATIVE by cooperatives worldwide. It is the MONITOR COLLECTED DATA FOR 2,575 ORGANISATIONS 0,5-1 MLN 154 only report of its kind collecting 1,156 ORGANISATIONS HAVE A TURNOVER OVER 100 MLN US$ annual quantitative data on the 200-500 MLN 337 global cooperative movement. SECTORS OF ACTIVITY 100-200 MLN 341 50-100 MLN 159 10-50 MLN 493 5-10 MLN 128 22 97 156 174 376 410 494 846 1-5 MLN 335 1% 4% 6% 7% 15% 16% 19% 33% 0,5-1 MLN 60 Other Health, Insurance Industry Wholesale Other Banking Agriculture education and cooperatives and and services and financial and food social care and mutuals utilities retail trade services industries 0-500 K 234 NUMBER OF COOPERATIVES The data collected for the 2018 edition of the World Cooperative DATA FOR 2016 COMES FROM: 0 100 200 300 400 500 Monitor is from the year 2016. The primary sources of data include Existing rankings existing databases of economic data, data collected by national Orbis WCM This report presents rankings based on turnover as well as the ratio of turnover over Gross Domestic Product associations, research institutes, and other organisations, and the use Questionnaire (GDP) per capita. The ratio of turnover over GDP per capita measures the turnover of the Top 300 cooperative of a questionnaire to collect data directly from enterprises. Euricse Euricse Aida and mutual enterprises in terms of the purchasing power of an economy, relating the turnover of the makes every effort to then complete the dataset through online Eikon enterprise to the wealth of the country. It does not compute the contribution of each enterprise to the national research and consultation of financial statements and annual reports. 76% 11% 5% 4% 4% 0% GDP. Rather, it measures the size of the enterprise in its national context. 6 2016 Highlights 2016 Highlights 7 EXPLORING THE COOPERATIVE ECONOMY REPORT 2018 TURNOVER 2,575 ORGANISATIONS TOP 300 GDP PER CAPITA TOP 300 BASED ON TURNOVER IN US $ DISTRIBUTED IN DISTRIBUTED IN 300 TOTAL TURNOVER 2,018.02 BILLION US$ 26 COUNTRIES BASED ON TURNOVER/GDP PER CAPITA 34 COUNTRIES 2% 1% 2% 2% Other services Health, education Other services Health, education 4% and social care 2% and social care Industry and utilities Industry and utilities 7% 33% 8% 35% Banking and Insurance cooperatives Banking and Agriculture financial services ORGANISATIONS and mutuals financial services ORGANISATIONS and food industries 20% 33% 19% 32% Wholesale Agriculture Wholesale Insurance cooperatives and retail trade and food industries and retail trade and mutuals ORGANISATION COUNTRY ORGANISATION COUNTRY Groupe Crédit Agricole France IFFCO India Groupe BPCE France Groupe Crédit Agricole France BVR Germany Groupe BPCE France Zenkyoren Japan Gujarat Cooperative Milk Marketing Federation Limited India REWE Group Germany Zenkyoren Japan Nippon Life Japan Nonghyup Republic of Korea ACDLEC - E. Leclerc France BVR Germany Groupe Crédit Mutuel France ACDLEC - E. Leclerc France Zen-Noh Japan REWE Group Germany State Farm USA Groupe Crédit Mutuel France 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 RANK 2016 The complete Top 300 ranking based on turnover in US$ is on page 72. SECTOR OF ACTIVITY RANK 2016 The complete Top 300 ranking based on turnover/GDP per CAPITA is on page 81. SECTOR OF ACTIVITY 8 2016 Highlights 2016 Highlights 9 EXPLORING THE COOPERATIVE ECONOMY REPORT 2018 UK France Japan The UK Co-operative La cooperation agricole et agroalimentaire, Top 10 Community-Based Economy report – published Panorama and Les 100 plus grandes entreprises Retail Co-ops in Japan – by Co-operatives UK coopératives françaises – published by CoopFR published by JCCU NATIONAL USA Top 100 Agriculture Cooperatives - RANKINGS published by United States Department of Agriculture Rural Development (USDA) The highlighted countries publish Spain Malaysia NCB Co-op 100 - published by National or have recently published a Listado de empresas más relevantes de la Top 100 cooperatives in Malaysia – Cooperative Bank (NCB) national ranking of the largest Economía social – published by CEPES published by Suruhanjaya Koperasi cooperatives or a report on their Malaysia (SKM) country’s cooperative movement including rankings based on turnover of cooperatives. The World Cooperative Monitor encourages national organisations and federations at all levels to Colombia Australia Desempeño Sector Cooperativo Colombiano National Mutual Economy Report collect as much data as possible. If – published by Confecoop - Confederación de – published by Business Council of you would like assistance creating Cooperativas de Colombia Co-operatives and Mutuals your national ranking or report, we are available to assist you and to share our methodology. New Zealand The New Zealand Co-operative Economy – published by NZ.Coop and Massey University Contact us! [email protected] 10 National Rankings National Rankings 11 EXPLORING THE COOPERATIVE ECONOMY REPORT 2018 SECTOR SNAPSHOTS The following pages present the World Cooperative Moni- Two different indicators have been used in these rank- tor rankings by sector of activity. The results presented in ings: turnover in US dollars and the ratio of turnover the rankings are to be considered exploratory, not exhaus- over GDP per capita. The ratio of turnover over GDP tive. The methodology found on page 63 provides details is not intended to compute the contribution of each concerning the data collection and analysis; however, some cooperative to the national GDP, but rather to relate key points to keep in mind regarding the rankings include: the turnover of the cooperative to the wealth of the country in which it operates.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Coop Extra Coop Obs!
    Års- og samfunnsrapport 2010 Års- og samfunns- rapport 2010 Det handler om verdier Innhold Nøkkeltall 1 2010 i kortform 2–3 Coops organisasjon 2–3 Administrerende direktør har ordet 4 Coop og samfunnet 6 Coop og produktene 12 Coop og medarbeiderne 20 Coop og kundene 28 Coop og miljøet 34 Coop og virksomheten 42 Coop Norge Handel AS 44 Coop Norge Handel Faghandel 48 Coop Norge Industri AS 50 Kjedepresentasjon 52 Smart Club AS 57 Coop Norge Eiendom AS 58 Styrets beretning 60 Regnskap og noter 70 GRI indikatorer 99 Firmainformasjon og adresser 102 KRISTINE DOBBE coop medlem nr: 600571 1354 834712 Nøkkeltall Store strukturelle endringer i Coop Norge SA konsern for årene 2007 og 2008 har påvirket regnskapstallene i vesentlig grad for disse årene. Finansielle nøkkeltall for Coop Norge SA 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 Tall i millioner kroner Totale driftsinntekter 29 288 28 662 26 879 23 506 21 536 Driftsresultat før finansposter 301 156 (438) (374) 41 Ordinært resultat før skatt 280 131 (278) 2 462 122 Årsresultat (majoritet) 228 85 (158) 2 592 111 Kapital Totalkapital 13 117 11 980 12 119 11 108 7 265 Egenkapital, inkl minoritetsinteresser 4 847 4 611 4 624 4 601 2 100 Egenkapitalandel 37 % 38 % 38 % 41 % 29 % Lønnsomhet Driftsmargin før finansposter 1,0 % 0,5 % -1,6 % -1,6 % 0,2 % Driftsmargin 1,0 % 0,4 % -1,0 % 10,5 % 0,6 % Resultatgrad 0,8 % 0,3 % -0,6 % 11,0 % 0,5 % Gjennomsnitt antall årsverk i 2 267 2 449 2 254 1 767 57 Coop Norge SA Konsern Tall på medlemmer i samvirkelagene 1 257 139 1 208 667 1 163 040 1 111 719 1 063 365 Tall på samvirkelag 127 133 137 146 162 Strukturelle endringer mens virksomheten ble lagt inn i et eget selskap, Frem til 31.12.2007 eide Coop Norge SA 20 prosent av Smart Club AS.
    [Show full text]
  • Exporter Guide Norway
    THIS REPORT CONTAINS ASSESSMENTS OF COMMODITY AND TRADE ISSUES MADE BY USDA STAFF AND NOT NECESSARILY STATEMENTS OF OFFICIAL U.S. GOVERNMENT POLICY Voluntary - Public Date: 3/1/2018 GAIN Report Number: NL8008 Norway Post: The Hague Exporter Guide Report Categories: Beverages Dried Fruit Exporter Guide Fishery Products Raisins Retail Foods Snack Foods SP1 - Expand International Marketing Opportunities Special Certification - Organic/Kosher/Halal Tree Nuts Wine Approved By: Susan Phillips Prepared By: Marcel Pinckaers Report Highlights: This exporter guide provides practical tips for U.S. exporters on how to conduct business in Norway. Although a small market, Norway relies heavily on imports. There are export opportunities for U.S. exporters of specialty foods, wine, craft beer, seafood, tree nuts, food preparations and dried fruit. Especially well-known brands and products from the United States fare well in this affluent market. Introduction Norway is located in Northern Europe and is a part of the Scandinavian Peninsula. The majority of the country shares a border to the east with Sweden while its northernmost region is bordered by Finland to the south and Russia to the east. Norway's extensive coastline is facing the North Atlantic Ocean and the Barents Sea. Map of Northwest Europe With 324 thousand square kilometers, Norway belongs to the top ten largest countries in Europe. Norway is also one of the most sparsely populated countries in Europe and has a coastline ten times its length. Norway’s population is 5.2 million and the vast majority live in urban areas. Almost one million people live in its capital Oslo.
    [Show full text]
  • The Governance of Large Co-Operative Businesses
    The Governance of Large Co-operative Businesses A research study by Professor Johnston Birchall 2 The governance of large co-operative businesses This is the second edition, comprehensively revised, of a research study which has been widely recognised as the first comprehensive research study into how co-operative businesses worldwide operate in terms of their governance. The opinions contained in this document are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the formal policy of Co-operatives UK. Contents Summary 3 Glossary of terms used in the report 6 Introduction 9 1. Is there a problem of governance in co-operatives? 13 2. A theory of co-operative governance 25 3. The agriculture and food industries sector 41 4. The wholesale and retail sector 52 5. The industry and utilities sector 62 6. The health and social care sector 69 7. The banking and financial services 79 8. The insurance sector 89 9. Findings 98 10. Conclusion: design for good governance 102 Bibliography 108 Endnotes 112 3 The governance of large co-operative businesses Summary Core to the identity of the co-operative form of businesses is the claim that it can be clearly distinguished from investor-owned enterprise through its member ownership and governance. How this distinction works in practice, however, has been less clear. Focusing on the world’s largest co-operatives, the first edition of this research study set out to fill gaps in our knowledge. Since its publication in 2014, a focus on governance in co-operatives has been evident in many countries, reinforcing the value and relevance of a return to this research in a comprehensively revised second edition.
    [Show full text]
  • Samvirkebeskatningen I Norge På 1900-Tallet
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives Samvirkebeskatningen i Norge på 1900-tallet En historisk analyse av den politiske debatten, regelverket og ligningspraksis med hovedvekt på landbrukssamvirke og forbrukerkooperasjonen av Harald Espeli Forskningsrapport 2/2003 Handelshøyskolen BI Institutt for innovasjon og økonomisk organisering Senter for samvirkeforskning Harald Espeli: Samvirkebeskatningen i Norge på 1900-tallet. En historisk analyse av den politiske debatten, regelverket og ligningspraksis med hovedvekt på landbrukssamvirke og forbrukerkooperasjonen. Harald Espeli 2003 Forskningsrapport 2/2003 ISSN: 0803-2610 Handelshøyskolen BI P.b. 580 1302 Sandvika Tlf: 67 55 70 00 www.bi.no Rapporten kan bestilles fra: Norli, avd. Sandvika Telefon: +47 67 55 74 51 Fax: +47 67 55 74 50 Mail: [email protected] 2 Sammendrag og forord Utfra en historiefaglig synsvinkel beskriver og analyserer rapporten utvik- lingen av norsk samvirkebeskatning fra slutten av 1800-tallet og frem til en høyesterettsdom i 2001. Skattelovene av 1911 innebar at samvirkeforetak innen jordbrukssektoren og forbruksforeninger (kooperasjonen) ble under- lagt et særskilt skatteregime frem til skattereformen i 1992. Skatteregimet ble utvidet til fiskerisamvirke i 1931 og salgssamvirke i skogbruket i 1949. Skatteregimet innebar at samvirkeforetak innenfor disse sektorer ble prosent- lignet, ikke regnskapslignet som andre foretak. Prosentligningen innebar at skattbar inntekt ble fastsatt til en viss andel av samvirkeforetakets skattbare formue. Den særskilte skattleggingen av samvirke var motivert utfra et politisk ønske om å fremme organisasjonsformen innenfor utvalgte deler av økonomien på begynnelsen av 1900-tallet. Samtidig erkjente politikerne at ordinær regn- skapsligning ikke uten videre kunne benytte i skattleggingen av samvirke- foretak på grunn av organisasjonsformens særpreg.
    [Show full text]
  • Norway Legal Framework Analysis Report.Pdf
    LEGAL FRAMEWORK ANALYSIS NATIONAL REPORT: NORWAY ICA-EU PARTNERSHIP TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction .................................................................................................................. 3 II. National cooperative law: Norway ............................................................................ 4 i. General Context..................................................................................................... 4 ii. Specific elements of the cooperative law .............................................................. 5 a) Definition and objectives of cooperatives......................................................... 5 b) Establishment, cooperative membership and governance ............................ 11 c) Cooperative financial structure and taxation .................................................. 14 iii. Other specific features......................................................................................... 18 d) Cooperative internal and external control and cooperation among cooperatives 18 III. Degree of “cooperative friendliness” of the national legislation ...................... 19 IV. Recommendations for the improvement of the national legal framework ...... 23 V. Conclusions .............................................................................................................. 23 National Expert: Julie Nåvik Hval 2 I. Introduction The research falls within the scope of the knowledge-building activities undertaken within the partnership for international development
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring the Co-Operative Economy Report 2017
    EXPLORING THE CO-OPERATIVE ECONOMY REPORT 2017 REPORT 2017 EXPLORING THE CO-OPERATIVE ECONOMY www.monitor.coop Titolo capitolo 1 THE WORLD CO-OPERATIVE MONITOR IS AN ALLIANCE INITIATIVE WITH THE SCIENTIFIC SUPPORT OF EURICSE MADE POSSIBLE BY THE SUPPORT OF OUR ORGANISATIONAL PARTNERS FOR INFORMATION CONTACT www.monitor.coop [email protected] THE 2017 WORLD Charles Gould CO-OPERATIVE MONITOR Gianluca Salvatori EXPLORING THE CO-OPERATIVE ECONOMY Welcome to the sixth annual World Co-operative Monitor not seem to reflect the co-operative movement as a whole but report produced in partnership by the International Co-oper- more likely specific economic conditions. ative Alliance (the Alliance) and the European Research Insti- Another addition to this year’s report is the analysis of the tute on Cooperative and Social Enterprises (Euricse). As we do capital structure of not only the Top 300 but also a sample each year, with this publication we report on the world’s largest of smaller co-operatives and mutuals, allowing for compari- co-operative and mutual organizations, providing a ranking of son of different types of co-operative businesses. The results the Top 300 and sectorial analysis based on 2015 financial data. of this research show that large co-operatives and mutuals In addition to the rankings based on US Dollar, we have do not have specific problems raising capital related to the added rankings using the International Dollar as calculated by co-operative business model, though smaller co-opera- the World Bank. The rankings using this measure replace the tives do have some challenges mostly related to obtaining rankings based on turnover over GDP per capita and aim to internal capital and long-term debt.
    [Show full text]
  • Coop Norge Handel AS - ICA Norge AS - Konkurranseloven § 16, Jf
    Offentlig versjon Unntatt offentlighet jfr offl § 13, fvl § 13.1.2 Offentlighet Deres ref.: Vår ref.: 2014/0373-417 Saksbehandler: Astrid Boge Dato: 04.03.2015 Saksansvarlig: Magnus Gabrielsen Vedtak V2015-24 - Coop Norge Handel AS - ICA Norge AS - konkurranseloven § 16, jf. § 20 - inngrep mot foretakssammenslutning - vilkår (1) Konkurransetilsynet viser til melding om foretakssammenslutning ("meldingen") mottatt 5. november 2014, tilsynets varsel 8. desember 2014 om at inngrep mot foretakssammenslutningen kan bli aktuelt, samt melders endelige forslag til avhjelpende tiltak 3. mars 2015. Videre vises det til øvrig skriftlig korrespondanse og annen kontakt i anledning saken. (2) Konkurransetilsynet har kommet til at foretakssammenslutningen mellom Coop Norge Handel AS ("Coop") og Ica Norge AS ("Ica") kan føre til eller forsterke en vesentlig begrensning av konkurransen i dagligvaremarkedet. (3) Melder har fremsatt forslag til avhjelpende tiltak, og Konkurransetilsynet har funnet at de avhjelpende tiltakene vil avbøte de konkurransebegrensende virkningene som foretakssammenslutningen kan føre til. Konkurransetilsynet har på denne bakgrunn fattet vedtak om inngrep hvor foretakssammenslutningen tillates på vilkår, jf. konkurranseloven1 § 16 annet ledd jf. § 20 fjerde ledd. 1 Innledning 1.1 Sakens bakgrunn (4) Saken gjelder foretakssammenslutning mellom Coop og Ica, også omtalt som "partene". (5) I henhold til aksjekjøpsavtale inngått 3. oktober 2014 mellom Coop og Ica Detalj AB skal Coop erverve samtlige aksjer i Ica. 1.2 Konkurransetilsynets saksbehandling (6) Konkurransetilsynet har i anledning saken innhentet omfattende informasjon fra en rekke aktører i markedet, herunder partene og deres konkurrenter. 1 Lov 5. mars 2004 nr. 12 om konkurranse mellom foretak og kontroll med foretakssammenslutninger. 2 (7) Partene har utover melding datert 31.
    [Show full text]
  • Grønn Butikk? Miljø- Og Etikkvurdering Av Dagligvarebransjen
    FRAMTIDEN I VÅRE HENDER RAPPORT 2/2014 Grønn butikk? Miljø- og etikkvurdering av dagligvarebransjen Av John Hille Tittel Grønn butikk? Miljø- og etikkvurdering av dagligvarebransjen Forfatter John Hille Utgivelse 2/2014 Utgiver Framtiden i våre hender, Fredensborgveien 24 G, 0177 Oslo Ansvarlig redaktør Arild Hermstad Prosjektstyrer Håkon Lindahl Faglig kvalitetssikrer Tormod Lien, Stiftelsen Miljømerking Styreansvarlig Ida Dokk Smith Forsidefoto iStockphoto Det oppfordres til å sitere og bruke opplysninger fra denne rapporten. Framtiden i våre hender oppgis som kilde. Denne rapporten ble godkjent av Framtiden i våre henders forskningsinstitutt den 17. juni 2014. Instituttet har til formål å engasjere eksterne fagfolk med den nødvendige vitenskapelige kompetanse til å utføre prosjekter innen miljø- og utviklingsspørsmål. Prosjektene skal frambringe vitenskapelige utredninger som skal publiseres i Framtiden i våre henders rapportserie og legges ut til offentlig debatt. Rapportene kvalitetssikres og godkjennes av instituttets styre, som består av: Pål Strandbakken Eva Langslet Jørn Stave Thomas Cottis Ida Dokk Smith Steffen Kallbekken Miljø- og etikkvurdering av dagligvarebransjen INNHOLDSFORTEGNELSE SAMMENDRAG ........................................................................................................................................... 3 INNLEDNING ............................................................................................................................................... 5 METODE ......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • GAIN Report Global Agriculture Information Network
    Foreign Agricultural Service GAIN Report Global Agriculture Information Network Voluntary Report - public distribution Date: 7/20/2001 GAIN Report #SW1013 Sweden Retail Food Sector Food Retail Cooperatives in the Nordics Merge 2001 Approved by: Lana Bennett U.S. Embassy, Stockholm Prepared by: Bjorn Engstrom Report Highlights: One of the largest Nordic retailers has just been formed by the merger of Swedish KF, Danish FDB and Coop Norway. Coop Norden, as it will be called, is estimated to have a turnover of U.S. $ 8 billion. Headquarters will be located in Gothenburg, Sweden and the company launch is scheduled for January 1, 2002. The company plans to form new, unified marketing concepts and is seeking new products. Includes PSD changes: No Includes Trade Matrix: No Unscheduled Report Stockholm [SW1], SW GAIN Report #SW1013 Page 1 of 1 One of the largest Nordic retailers has just been formed by the merger of Swedish Kooperativa Forbundet (KF), Danish Faellesforeningen for Danmarks Brugsforeninger (FDB) and Coop Norway. It will be named Coop Norden and is estimated to have a turnover of 80 billion SEK (roughly U.S. $8 billion), a 29% market share and 26,000 employees. Coop Norden’s headquarters will be located in Gothenburg, Sweden and the company launch is scheduled for January 1, 2002. "Our vision is that Coop Norden will be the leading and most innovative retailer in the Nordics with a consumer cooperative identity," Roland Svensson of KF Sweden said. What prompted the merger was the recent increase in competition from large international chains and the pace of changes in the industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Food for Thought
    FOOD FOR THOUGHT COOP NORWAY CASE FOR THE NHH INTERNATIONAL CASE COMPETITION 2019 2Photo: Svalbardposten COOP NORWAY CASE FOR THE NHH INTERNATIONAL CASE COMPETITION 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS THE BACKDROP 5 ABOUT THE COMPANY 6 PURPOSE, VISION AND CORPORATE STRATEGY 13 THE NORWEGIAN GROCERY RETAIL MARKET 19 SELECTED TRENDS 27 YOUR TASK 30 3 COOP NORWAY CASE FOR THE NHH INTERNATIONAL CASE COMPETITION 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS Photo: John Terje Pedersen Photo: John Terje 4 COOP NORWAY CASE FOR THE NHH INTERNATIONAL CASE COMPETITION 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS THE BACKDROP It is said that while twice is a happy coincidence, a third spanning from the northernmost to the southernmost of Will the future population be more interested in sustain- regular occurrence marks the manifestation of a tradition. Norway, has until now provided the main meeting point able, locally sourced food or having a bountiful selection This autumn, you are a part of the select few that have between Coop and the customers, including its more than of goods to choose from? Is the outlook of a hassle-free been chosen to compete in the 3rd edition of the NHH 1.7 million co-owners. shopping affair enough to change our habits into ordering International Case Competition. Along with Coop Norway, all our food online? Are there other factors influencing the organizing committee are thrilled to have you here. The Norwegian grocery market is highly concen- our behaviour that may play a much greater role? We look forward to seeing you build on and continue the trated around the three major players, notably legacy of hard work and great memories from years past, NorgesGruppen, Coop, and Reitangruppen, with The one thing that is certain is that the wind of change while turning your eyes towards the future of the grocery Bunnpris in the place as fourth largest.
    [Show full text]
  • Credit Analysis: Norgesgruppen ASA
    10 February 2009 www.nordea.com Lars Kirkeby +47 2248 4264 [email protected] Credit Analysis: NorgesGruppen ASA Company ratings Norway’s largest food retail chain and wholesaler NorgesGruppen ASA (NG) is the largest food retail chain in Norway Long Outlook with a 39.2% market share and a turnover of approximately NOK 23bn Moody’s nr nr in first half of 2008. The wholesale operations are by far the largest in Standard & Poor’s nr nr Norway and enjoys substantial economies of scale. Nordea A- Stable Strong market positions Unsecured bond ratings The Norwegian food retail industry is highly concentrated with four players controlling the market after Lidl exited Norway in early 2008. Long Outlook Economies of scale and restrictions on new store openings constitute Moody’s nr nr barriers to entry. A relatively high price level contributes to fairly Standard & Poor’s nr nr attractive industry characteristics, even though the entry by Lidl caused Nordea A- Stable increased price competition by the four established players. Similarly, food wholesale is concentrated, with NG being the market leader. Revenue and EBITDA (NOKm) Strong credit profile 50 000 7.0% With net debt to EBITDA (12 months rolling) ending at 1.9x at half- 6.0% 40 000 year 2008 we consider NG’s leverage to be very low and the group 5.0% 30 000 4.0% enjoys strong credit ratios. The interest coverage ratios are also strong, 20 000 3.0% 2.0% with EBITDA (12 months rolling) to net interest ending half-year 2008 10 000 1.0% at 10.1 x, despite somewhat weaker operating margins compared to 0 0.0% 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 international peers.
    [Show full text]
  • Analyse Av Kapitalstruktur I Samvirket Coop
    NORGES HANDELSHØYSKOLE Bergen, høst 2018 Analyse av kapitalstruktur i samvirket Coop Hvilke faktorer påvirker gjeldsandelen i norske samvirkelag? Ørjan Aasen og Hallgeir Aspli Veileder: Petter Bjerksund Masterutredning i økonomi og administrasjon Finansiell økonomi/Økonomisk styring NORGES HANDELSHØYSKOLE Dette selvstendige arbeidet er gjennomført som ledd i masterstudiet i økonomi- og administrasjon ved Norges Handelshøyskole og godkjent som sådan. Godkjenningen innebærer ikke at Høyskolen eller sensorer innestår for de metoder som er anvendt, resultater som er fremkommet eller konklusjoner som er trukket i arbeidet. Sammendrag I denne utredningen undersøkes hvilke faktorer som påvirker gjeldsandelen i Coop sine største samvirkelag, og i hvilken grad disse resultatene kan forklares av etablerte teorier for kapitalstruktur. Først presenteres relevant teori, hvor Pecking Order, Market Timing og Trade- Off Theory legger grunnlaget for hypotesene i oppgaven. Disse teoriene blir sammen med tidligere empiri benyttet til å velge fem selskapsspesifikke og to makroøkonomiske forklaringsvariabler som skal inngå i den kvantitative analysen. Hypotesene blir testet ved å gjennomføre to multiple regresjonsanalyser bestående av paneldata for de 15 største samvirkelagene i Coop Norge i perioden 2001-2017. De mest betydningsfulle faktorene for å forklare gjeldsandelen er størrelse (+), andel varige driftsmidler (+), pengemarkedsrente (+), skatt (-) og lønnsomhet (-). Vi kan vise at alle disse faktorene har hatt signifikant betydning for våre data i perioden. Variabelen inflasjon synes derimot ikke å ha noen betydning for kapitalstrukturen. Det mest interessante funnet relaterer seg til rentenivåets påvirkning. Her kan vi vise til et funn som skiller seg fra både teori og empiri. Den økonomiske betydningen er likevel av begrenset verdi da flere av regresjonskoeffisientene er lave. Utredningen viser dessuten at etablert teori innen kapitalstruktur delvis kan overføres til samvirkelag, da enkelte av våre funn er i tråd med Trade-Off Theory og Pecking Order Theory.
    [Show full text]