Exporter Guide Norway
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
26 Scandinavian Brewers' Review . Vol.65 No.3 2008
26 SCANDINAVIAN BREWERS’ REVIEW . VOL.65 NO.3 2008 arTicle NorwaY’S larGesT ProdUcer OF AQUaviT Halvor HEUch, ProdUCT DeveloPMenT ManaGer and DisTiller, ArcUS, E-Mail: [email protected] Brewmasters and engineers are not restricted to the brewing and soft drinks industries; they also have options in other related industries such as the manufacturing of distilled spirits and aquavit. The ageing of Norwegian aquavit resembles that of specialty beer, as this account from Norway’s largest producer of aquavit, Arcus, points out. WHO WE ARE bottles increased steadily. This Arcus AS is a private company and put the returnable bottle system the former production plant of the under pressure, with the end result old state owned wine monopoly being what we know today; only (Vinmonopolet), established in new glass is used. We do not have 1922. As a direct consequence of this any returnable bottle deposit on monopolisation, all private distiller- wine bottles anymore, and this ies and wine merchants in Norway also resulted in Norway’s only were forced to sell their companies glasswork closing down. to the new state owned company; Today, the wine monopoly only the idea being that no private person should profit from selling has the sole right to sell wine and spirits to the Norwegians. alcohol, as this would lead to higher alcohol consumption. In the beginning, the monopoly had a somewhat limited product Arcus has a large portfolio, and the product range includes range, focusing mainly on wine, due to prohibition. But after wine from all over the world both in bottles and in bulk for our 1927, Norway opened up for the sales of spirits again, and own brands. -
71877/687532 09/5380- 18.09.2014
A ROYAL NORWEGIAN MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND CARE SERVICES EFTA Surveillance Authority Rue Belliard 35 B-1040 Brussel Your ref Our ref Date 71877/687532 09/5380- 18.09.2014 Response from the Norwegian Government to the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s letter of formal notice - legislation on private import of alcohol 1. INTRODUCTION Reference is made to the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s (“the Authority”) letter of formal notice to Norway for maintaining in force certain legislation on private import of alcohol, dated 18 June 2014. The letter was forwarded from the Norwegian Ministry of Finance to the Norwegian Ministry of Health and Care Services, which is responsible for the Norwegian legislation on alcohol. By the Authority’s e-mail of 3 July 2014, an extension of the deadline for Norway’s response was granted until 18 September 2014. On behalf of the Norwegian Government (“the Government”), the Ministry of Health and Care Services hereby gives its response to the letter of formal notice. The Government respectfully submits that the Norwegian requirement on functional and structural separation between the undertaking selling the alcoholic beverages and the undertaking delivering the beverages does not violate Article 11 and/or 36 EEA. The Government refers in this regard to its letters of 21 August 2012, 20 December 2012 and 24 January 2014, as well as to its letter of 21 December 2009'. In addition, the Government would like to make the following remarks. 1 Complaint concerning the import an distribution of alcohol in Norway, case 67389/539008. See the remarks on question 4 and 5.___________________________________________________________ Postal address Visiting address Telephone* Departement of Public Our officer POBox 8011 Dep Teatergt, 9 +47 22 24 90 90 Health Hege Christina 0030 Oslo Vat no. -
A Hans Krüger Arctic Expedition Cache on Axel Heiberg Island, Nunavut ROBERT W
ARCTIC VOL. 60, NO. 1 (MARCH 2007) P. 1–6 A Hans Krüger Arctic Expedition Cache on Axel Heiberg Island, Nunavut ROBERT W. PARK1 and DOUGLAS R. STENTON2 (Received 13 June 2006; accepted in revised form 31 July 2006) ABSTRACT. In 1999 a team of geologists discovered an archaeological site near Cape Southwest, Axel Heiberg Island. On the basis of its location and the analysis of two artifacts removed from the site, the discoverers concluded that it was a hastily abandoned campsite created by Hans Krüger’s German Arctic Expedition, which was believed to have disappeared between Meighen and Amund Ringnes islands in 1930. If the attribution to Krüger were correct, the existence of this site would demonstrate that the expedition got farther on its return journey to Bache Peninsula than previously believed. An archaeological investigation of the site by the Government of Nunavut in 2004 confirmed its tentative attribution to the German Arctic Expedition but suggested that it is not a campsite, but the remains of a deliberately and carefully constructed cache. The finds suggest that one of the three members of the expedition may have perished before reaching Axel Heiberg Island, and that the survivors, in order to lighten their sledge, transported valued but heavy items (including Krüger’s geological specimens) to this prominent and well-known location to cache them, intending to return and recover them at some later date. Key words: German Arctic Expedition, Hans Krüger, archaeology, geology, Axel Heiberg Island, Nunavut RÉSUMÉ. En 1999, une équipe de géologues a découvert un lieu d’importance archéologique près du cap Southwest, sur l’île Axel Heiberg. -
Coop Extra Coop Obs!
Års- og samfunnsrapport 2010 Års- og samfunns- rapport 2010 Det handler om verdier Innhold Nøkkeltall 1 2010 i kortform 2–3 Coops organisasjon 2–3 Administrerende direktør har ordet 4 Coop og samfunnet 6 Coop og produktene 12 Coop og medarbeiderne 20 Coop og kundene 28 Coop og miljøet 34 Coop og virksomheten 42 Coop Norge Handel AS 44 Coop Norge Handel Faghandel 48 Coop Norge Industri AS 50 Kjedepresentasjon 52 Smart Club AS 57 Coop Norge Eiendom AS 58 Styrets beretning 60 Regnskap og noter 70 GRI indikatorer 99 Firmainformasjon og adresser 102 KRISTINE DOBBE coop medlem nr: 600571 1354 834712 Nøkkeltall Store strukturelle endringer i Coop Norge SA konsern for årene 2007 og 2008 har påvirket regnskapstallene i vesentlig grad for disse årene. Finansielle nøkkeltall for Coop Norge SA 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 Tall i millioner kroner Totale driftsinntekter 29 288 28 662 26 879 23 506 21 536 Driftsresultat før finansposter 301 156 (438) (374) 41 Ordinært resultat før skatt 280 131 (278) 2 462 122 Årsresultat (majoritet) 228 85 (158) 2 592 111 Kapital Totalkapital 13 117 11 980 12 119 11 108 7 265 Egenkapital, inkl minoritetsinteresser 4 847 4 611 4 624 4 601 2 100 Egenkapitalandel 37 % 38 % 38 % 41 % 29 % Lønnsomhet Driftsmargin før finansposter 1,0 % 0,5 % -1,6 % -1,6 % 0,2 % Driftsmargin 1,0 % 0,4 % -1,0 % 10,5 % 0,6 % Resultatgrad 0,8 % 0,3 % -0,6 % 11,0 % 0,5 % Gjennomsnitt antall årsverk i 2 267 2 449 2 254 1 767 57 Coop Norge SA Konsern Tall på medlemmer i samvirkelagene 1 257 139 1 208 667 1 163 040 1 111 719 1 063 365 Tall på samvirkelag 127 133 137 146 162 Strukturelle endringer mens virksomheten ble lagt inn i et eget selskap, Frem til 31.12.2007 eide Coop Norge SA 20 prosent av Smart Club AS. -
1 Introduction
Brussels, 18 June 2014 Case No: 71877 EventNo:687532 Dec No: 22lll3lCOL Ministry of Finance Postboks 8008 Dep N-0030 Oslo Norway Dear Sir or Madam, Subject: Letter of formal notice to Norway for maintaining in force certain legislation on private importation of alcohol 1 Introduction In Norway, retail sale of alcoholic beverages may only be undertaken by the State monopoly AS Vinmonopolet ("Vinmonopolet"). However, a private person in Norway may import alcoholic beverages without the assistance or involvernent of Vinmonopolet into Norway, if it is intended for private use. Such importation may take the form of the importer carrying the beverages over the border himself, or he may have the goods delivered by a transport company authorised to deliver alcohol into Norway. The transport company delivering the alcoholic beverages to the private importer can only provide the transport service; it cannot have any other involvement in the sale as such, and must be independent from the seller. The Authority understands that it is not necessary that the buyer himself contracts with the transport company. It is permissible for the buyer to enter into one single contract with the seller, for the sale and delivery of alcoholic beverages (and, thus, a seller abroad may offer alcoholic beverages with home delivery in Norway). But the seller must then outsource its deliveries into Norway to an independent transport company, whose advantage from such sales must be limited to normal remuneration for the transport service. The EFTA Surveillance Authority ("the Authority'') considers that this requirement of functional and structural separation between the undertaking selling the alcoholic beverages and the undertakings delivering the beverages violates the EEA rules on free movement of services and free movement of goods, as set out in Articles 36 atdlor 11 of the EEA Agreement, in so far as alcoholic beverages come under the product scope of the Agreement. -
Beer Festival in Time for Summer’S TT, Congratulations to the Region’S Breweries for Another Great Champion Beer of Britain Showing
FROM THE EDITOR There’s good news and bad news... In news that literally just landed from the Great British Beer Festival in time for summer’s TT, congratulations to the region’s breweries for another great Champion Beer of Britain showing. Gold in the ‘Specialist’ category went to Colchester Brewery’s Brazilian Coffee and Vanilla Porter, while silvers went to Mighty Oak’s Captain Bob and Bishop Nick’s 1555 in the ‘Bitter’ and ‘Best Bitter’ categories respectively. Well done to all concerned for the considerable effort involved in even getting to GBBF, never mind doing the day job at the same time! Unhappier tidings are that Chelmsford’s Round Tower is no more. An eleventh-hour plan by a local publican to buy out the brewery as a going concern didn’t come to pass, and we say thanks and goodbye to Simon and Hannah Tippler for some very tasty brews over the last few years. Further on the ‘Breweries Missing in Action’ theme, Felstar are taking a pause from production but are expecting to be back before 2020, according to Franco (via BLO Chris Mills). Seasons in the sun Some of my happiest memories are of the endless summer of ‘76, legendary for its dryness and heat. Summer 2018 is well on its way to surpassing ‘76, and what a summer beerfest we had, never thinking what the weather would be each day... Don’t forget that we also have a winter festival in February, and are recruiting now for management posts. Interested? Get in touch with WBFO Paul Murrell at [email protected]. -
The Governance of Large Co-Operative Businesses
The Governance of Large Co-operative Businesses A research study by Professor Johnston Birchall 2 The governance of large co-operative businesses This is the second edition, comprehensively revised, of a research study which has been widely recognised as the first comprehensive research study into how co-operative businesses worldwide operate in terms of their governance. The opinions contained in this document are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the formal policy of Co-operatives UK. Contents Summary 3 Glossary of terms used in the report 6 Introduction 9 1. Is there a problem of governance in co-operatives? 13 2. A theory of co-operative governance 25 3. The agriculture and food industries sector 41 4. The wholesale and retail sector 52 5. The industry and utilities sector 62 6. The health and social care sector 69 7. The banking and financial services 79 8. The insurance sector 89 9. Findings 98 10. Conclusion: design for good governance 102 Bibliography 108 Endnotes 112 3 The governance of large co-operative businesses Summary Core to the identity of the co-operative form of businesses is the claim that it can be clearly distinguished from investor-owned enterprise through its member ownership and governance. How this distinction works in practice, however, has been less clear. Focusing on the world’s largest co-operatives, the first edition of this research study set out to fill gaps in our knowledge. Since its publication in 2014, a focus on governance in co-operatives has been evident in many countries, reinforcing the value and relevance of a return to this research in a comprehensively revised second edition. -
Doublethink: the Two Faces of Norway's Foreign and Development
Doublethink: THE TWO FACES OF NORWAY’S FOREIGN AND DEVELOPMENT POLICY By Mark Curtis Mark Curtis er rådgiver på internasjonale utviklingsspørsmål og utenrikspolitisk analytiker. Han har skrevet fem bøker om britisk utenrikspolitikk og internasjonal utvikling, inkludert den kommende Secret Affairs: Britain’s Collusion with Radical Islam og bestselgeren Web of Deceit: Britain’s Real Role in the World (Vintage, 2003). Han har skrevet flere rapporter for frivillige organisasjoner om næringslivet, mat og landbruk, miljø, gruvedrift, handel og økonomiske spørsmål. Han har ledet World Development Movement, ledet policyavdelingen i ActionAid og Christian Aid, og vært stipendiat ved Royal Institute of International Affairs (Chatham House). Nettsider: www.curtisresearch.org og www.markcurtis.info. Rapporten er skrevet av Mark Curtis på oppdrag fra Forum for Utvikling og Miljø (ForUM). Synspunktene i denne rapporten er forfatterens, og reflekterer ikke nødvendigvis ForUMs synspunkter. Forsidefoto: Jonas Gahr Støre, Norges utenriksminister. Foto: Torbjørn Sønstrød. Utgitt: Første gang utgitt januar 2010. Rapporten kan lastes ned fra www.forumfor.no. FORORD Av Elin Enge, daglig leder, Forum for Utvikling og Miljø «Inntektene en stat innhenter, hvordan de innhentes, og måten den bruker dem på, definerer statens natur». Slik lyder den amerikanske oljestatsforskeren Terry Lynn Karls tese. Hva er så Norges natur? Om den finnes, er den neppe like ren som snø eller våre fjorder. Og langt mindre kjent. Noen av de største utfordringene i verden i dag er å takle klimakrisen, bekjempe fattigdom og å dempe og forebygge krig og konflikt. Dette er områder hvor Norge anser seg for å være foregangsland. Da utenriksministeren i fjor kom med den såkalte Refleksmeldingen om hovedlinjene i utenrikspolitikken – den første på tjue år – ble slike utfordringer betegnet som ”Norges utvidede egeninteresser”. -
Samvirkebeskatningen I Norge På 1900-Tallet
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives Samvirkebeskatningen i Norge på 1900-tallet En historisk analyse av den politiske debatten, regelverket og ligningspraksis med hovedvekt på landbrukssamvirke og forbrukerkooperasjonen av Harald Espeli Forskningsrapport 2/2003 Handelshøyskolen BI Institutt for innovasjon og økonomisk organisering Senter for samvirkeforskning Harald Espeli: Samvirkebeskatningen i Norge på 1900-tallet. En historisk analyse av den politiske debatten, regelverket og ligningspraksis med hovedvekt på landbrukssamvirke og forbrukerkooperasjonen. Harald Espeli 2003 Forskningsrapport 2/2003 ISSN: 0803-2610 Handelshøyskolen BI P.b. 580 1302 Sandvika Tlf: 67 55 70 00 www.bi.no Rapporten kan bestilles fra: Norli, avd. Sandvika Telefon: +47 67 55 74 51 Fax: +47 67 55 74 50 Mail: [email protected] 2 Sammendrag og forord Utfra en historiefaglig synsvinkel beskriver og analyserer rapporten utvik- lingen av norsk samvirkebeskatning fra slutten av 1800-tallet og frem til en høyesterettsdom i 2001. Skattelovene av 1911 innebar at samvirkeforetak innen jordbrukssektoren og forbruksforeninger (kooperasjonen) ble under- lagt et særskilt skatteregime frem til skattereformen i 1992. Skatteregimet ble utvidet til fiskerisamvirke i 1931 og salgssamvirke i skogbruket i 1949. Skatteregimet innebar at samvirkeforetak innenfor disse sektorer ble prosent- lignet, ikke regnskapslignet som andre foretak. Prosentligningen innebar at skattbar inntekt ble fastsatt til en viss andel av samvirkeforetakets skattbare formue. Den særskilte skattleggingen av samvirke var motivert utfra et politisk ønske om å fremme organisasjonsformen innenfor utvalgte deler av økonomien på begynnelsen av 1900-tallet. Samtidig erkjente politikerne at ordinær regn- skapsligning ikke uten videre kunne benytte i skattleggingen av samvirke- foretak på grunn av organisasjonsformens særpreg. -
General Information About Vinmonopolet in Norway
GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT VINMONOPOLET IN NORWAY Vinmonopolet is a monopoly situation in charge of the retail distribution of wine, spirits and strong beer in Norway. The products Vinmonopolet distribute are purchased from licensed suppliers which are called Grossister. LaMarc Wines holds a required license and agreements to act as a supplier to the monopoly. The organization have about 300 stores in Norway, in four different size categories. The population of Norway is approximately 5,2 million people. Vinmonopolet has approximately 18 000 products in its product range at this stage, and every year they purchase about 300 new products. Most of the products are purchased via the normal tender procedure, where Vinmonopolet announce a tender request and different products submitted will be judged on quality in relation to price in a blind tasting session. The volumes required for a product varies a lot, depending on the price, distribution and idea with a listing. Overall Vinmonpolet purchases more products and smaller volumes than what Systembolaget (Swedish monopoly) usually purchases. The Norwegian retail alcohol monopoly is as the other Scandinavian monopolies very pro organic products, and this we believe will be a trend that we will see more of within the next 5 years period. INFORMATION ABOUT VINMONPOLET AND THE TENDER SYSTEM As the monopoly tendering system is pretty complicated and difficult to understand, we´ve tried to summarize the process. For us it is very important that the producers we represent understand the procedure and by doing so participate with us in an ongoing, proactive work. Many producers today misunderstand the procedure due to unclear information from Scandinavian partners and we really want to avoid this. -
Digital Leaders in Norway 2019
Digital Leaders in Norway 2019 This study evaluates 78 leading Norwegian companies’ digital maturity across six dimensions: digital marketing, digital product experience, e-commerce, e-CRM, mobile and social media. It also includes a separate evaluation of 11 public organizations. www.bearingpoint.no digitalleaders.bearingpoint.com/norway Table of contents Editorial 3 Norwegian companies need Objectives and study sample 4 Research summary 6 to improve to keep up with Key findings 8 their European peers. We Digital Leaders at a glance 10 encourage them to take Dimensions of digitalization Digital marketing 14 a strategic approach to Digital product experience 16 digitalization, focus on the E-commerce 18 E-CRM 20 customer journeys and start Mobile 22 Social media 24 turning data into value. Industries Summary 28 Telecom 30 Retail 31 Food retail 32 Passenger transportation 33 Media 34 Insurance 35 TV & broadband 36 Bank 37 Energy 38 Consumer products (food) 39 Public sector Digital Leaders in Norway 2019 Purpose and selection criteria for the public sector 42 Summary of findings 44 Key findings 46 Dimensions of digitalization Digital presence 50 Digital experience 52 e-CRM 54 Mobile availability 56 Social media 58 Digital Leaders in Europe Summary 62 Top 10 European companies 64 European Digital Leaders by 66 digital dimension Summary What Norwegian companies could learn 72 from global forerunners Appendices All rankings 78 BearingPoint on digitalization 84 Authors 85 Editorial Digital leaders are customer-centric, focused on providing excellent customer journeys. They manage to turn data into value, and they have a digital leadership that ensures the right priorities, capabilities and momentum. -
Norway Legal Framework Analysis Report.Pdf
LEGAL FRAMEWORK ANALYSIS NATIONAL REPORT: NORWAY ICA-EU PARTNERSHIP TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction .................................................................................................................. 3 II. National cooperative law: Norway ............................................................................ 4 i. General Context..................................................................................................... 4 ii. Specific elements of the cooperative law .............................................................. 5 a) Definition and objectives of cooperatives......................................................... 5 b) Establishment, cooperative membership and governance ............................ 11 c) Cooperative financial structure and taxation .................................................. 14 iii. Other specific features......................................................................................... 18 d) Cooperative internal and external control and cooperation among cooperatives 18 III. Degree of “cooperative friendliness” of the national legislation ...................... 19 IV. Recommendations for the improvement of the national legal framework ...... 23 V. Conclusions .............................................................................................................. 23 National Expert: Julie Nåvik Hval 2 I. Introduction The research falls within the scope of the knowledge-building activities undertaken within the partnership for international development