DOCSLIB.ORG

Pennine Bridleway, Monk's Road to High Lane, Charlesworth, Derbyshire

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pennine Bridleway, Monk's Road to High Lane, Charlesworth, Derbyshire making sense of heritage PENNINE BRIDLEWAY, MONK'S ROAD TO HIGH LANE, CHARLESWORTH, DERBYSHIRE Landscape Survey, Archaeological Watching Brief and Trial Trenching Report Ref: 86440.03 January 2013 PENNINE BRIDLEWAY, MONK’S ROAD TO HIGH LANE, CHARLESWORTH, DERBYSHIRE Archaeological Landscape Survey, Evaluation and Watching Brief Report Prepared for: Derbyshire County Council by Wessex Archaeology Unit 6, Riverside Block Sheaf Bank Business Park Sheffield S2 3EN Report reference: 86440.03 January 2013 © Wessex Archaeology Limited 2013 all rights reserved Wessex Archaeology Limited is a Registered Charity No. 287786 Pennine Bridleway, Monks Road to High Lane, Charlesworth, Derbyshire Archaeological Landscape Survey, Evaluation and Watching Brief Report DISCLAIMER THE MATERIAL CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT WAS DESIGNED AS AN INTEGRAL PART OF A REPORT TO AN INDIVIDUAL CLIENT AND WAS PREPARED SOLELY FOR THE BENEFIT OF THAT CLIENT. THE MATERIAL CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT DOES NOT NECESSARILY STAND ON ITS OWN AND IS NOT INTENDED TO NOR SHOULD IT BE RELIED UPON BY ANY THIRD PARTY. TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW WESSEX ARCHAEOLOGY WILL NOT BE LIABLE BY REASON OF BREACH OF CONTRACT NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE (WHETHER DIRECT INDIRECT OR CONSEQUENTIAL) OCCASIONED TO ANY PERSON ACTING OR OMITTING TO ACT OR REFRAINING FROM ACTING IN RELIANCE UPON THE MATERIAL CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT ARISING FROM OR CONNECTED WITH ANY ERROR OR OMISSION IN THE MATERIAL CONTAINED IN THE REPORT. LOSS OR DAMAGE AS REFERRED TO ABOVE SHALL BE DEEMED TO INCLUDE, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO, ANY LOSS OF PROFITS OR ANTICIPATED PROFITS DAMAGE TO REPUTATION OR GOODWILL LOSS OF BUSINESS OR ANTICIPATED BUSINESS DAMAGES COSTS EXPENSES INCURRED OR PAYABLE TO ANY THIRD PARTY (IN ALL CASES WHETHER DIRECT INDIRECT OR CONSEQUENTIAL) OR ANY OTHER DIRECT INDIRECT OR CONSEQUENTIAL LOSS OR DAMAGE COPYRIGHT THIS REPORT MAY CONTAIN MATERIAL THAT IS NON-WESSEX ARCHAEOLOGY COPYRIGHT (E.G. ORDNANCE SURVEY, BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, CROWN COPYRIGHT), OR THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OF THIRD PARTIES, WHICH WE ARE ABLE TO PROVIDE FOR LIMITED REPRODUCTION UNDER THE TERMS OF OUR OWN COPYRIGHT LICENCES, BUT FOR WHICH COPYRIGHT ITSELF IS NON-TRANSFERRABLE BY WESSEX ARCHAEOLOGY. YOU ARE REMINDED THAT YOU REMAIN BOUND BY THE CONDITIONS OF THE COPYRIGHT, DESIGNS AND PATENTS ACT 1988 WITH REGARD TO MULTIPLE COPYING AND ELECTRONIC DISSEMINATION OF THE REPORT. QUALITY ASSURANCE CLIENT SITE CODE ACCESSION CODE 86440 DERSB 2012.30 CODE N/A PLANNING APPLICATION REF. - NGR 401755 393133 TO 402330 391300 VERSION STATUS* PREPARED APPROVED APPROVER’S DATE FILE BY BY SIGNATURE S:\PROJECTS\86440 (MONKS ROAD, CHARLESWORTH, V1.0 I AWT/CH RON Richard O’Neill DERBYSHIRE)\REPORTS\86440.03_MONKS_ROAD _WB_V1_1 * I= INTERNAL DRAFT E= EXTERNAL DRAFT F= FINAL © Wessex Archaeology Ltd. 2013 WA Project No. 86440 ii Pennine Bridleway, Monks Road to High Lane, Charlesworth, Derbyshire Archaeological Landscape Survey, Evaluation and Watching Brief Report PENNINE BRIDLEWAY, MONK’S ROAD TO HIGH LANE, CHARLESWORTH, DERBYSHIRE Archaeological Landscape Survey, Evaluation and Watching Brief Report Contents Figures and Plates .............................................................................................. iv Summary ............................................................................................................. v Acknowledgements ............................................................................................. vi 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................1 1.1 Project Background .....................................................................................1 1.2 The Site, Location and Geology ..................................................................1 2 ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL BACKGROUND ...............................2 2.1 Previous Archaeological Work .....................................................................2 3 METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................3 3.1 Aims and Objectives ....................................................................................3 3.2 Construction Methodology ...........................................................................3 3.3 Scope of Works and Recording ...................................................................4 4 RESULTS ............................................................................................................5 4.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................5 4.2 Trench 1 ......................................................................................................5 4.3 Trench 2 ......................................................................................................6 4.4 Trenches 3 and 4.........................................................................................6 4.5 Survey .........................................................................................................7 5 FINDS ..................................................................................................................8 5.1 Summary .....................................................................................................8 6 CONCLUSIONS ..................................................................................................8 6.1 Summary .....................................................................................................8 7 ARCHIVE .............................................................................................................9 7.1 Preparation ..................................................................................................9 7.2 Deposition....................................................................................................9 8 REFERENCES ....................................................................................................9 APPENDIX 1: ARCHIVE ............................................................................................11 APPENDIX 2: CONTEXT DESCRIPTIONS ...............................................................12 APPENDIX 3: ARTEFACTS BY CONTEXT ...............................................................13 APPENDIX 4: GAZETTEER OF SURVEYED FEATURES ........................................14 © Wessex Archaeology Ltd. 2013 WA Project No. 86440 iii Pennine Bridleway, Monks Road to High Lane, Charlesworth, Derbyshire Archaeological Landscape Survey, Evaluation and Watching Brief Report Figures and Plates Front Cover View from Monks Road over Simmondley Colliery towards Glossop Back Cover Location of Trench 2 from south east Figure 1 Site location Figure 2 Trench locations (Monks Road) Figure 3 Trench 1: Section across Roman road Figure 4 Trench 2: Section across Roman road Figure 5 Location of surveyed features (Simmondley Quarry) Figure 6 Hachured plans of surveyed features Plate 1 Cobblestone Roman road in Trench 1 (101) from south Plate 2 Part of Section across Roman road in Trench 1 from south Plate 3 Trench 2 pre-excavation. The Roman road was thought to occupy the ridge in the left of shot (east), but actually follows the ridge in the right of the shot (west). View from north Plate 4 Roman road (sand) in Trench 2 (202) from west Plate 5 Section across Roman road in Trench 2 from north © Wessex Archaeology Ltd. 2013 WA Project No. 86440 iv Pennine Bridleway, Monks Road to High Lane, Charlesworth, Derbyshire Archaeological Landscape Survey, Evaluation and Watching Brief Report PENNINE BRIDLEWAY, MONK’S ROAD TO HIGH LANE, CHARLESWORTH, DERBYSHIRE Archaeological Landscape Survey, Evaluation and Watching Brief Report Summary Wessex Archaeology was commissioned by Derbyshire County Council to undertake a programme of archaeological works prior to, and during, the installation of the Pennine Bridleway between Monk’s Road and High Lane, Charlesworth, Derbyshire (NGR 401755 393133 to 402330 391300). The archaeological works were undertaken in line with Written Schemes of Investigation (WSI’s) produced by Wessex Archaeology (2012a and 2012b), and approved by the Peak District National Park Authority. This report presents a brief description of the methodology followed, a description of the results and an interpretation of the findings. The Roman road from Buxton to Glossop was seen in two sections east of Monks Road, northeast of Higher Plainstead Farm. At the south end of the site, topsoil stripping for the site compound revealed a cobblestone track way. At the north end of the same field, trial trenching again located the road, although here it consisted of a compacted deposit of sand. In both instances the road was 4-5m wide, without ditches on either side. No other archaeological structures, features or deposits were observed. The survey of Simmondley Colliery revealed 7 potential features, although some of these may be natural sinkholes. A single celled building was also revealed, and probably relates to a mine worker’s hut or for shepherding in the 18th-19th century. The archive from the watching brief will be deposited with Buxton Museum and Art Gallery under the museum accession code DERSB 2012.30. © Wessex Archaeology Ltd. 2013 WA Project No. 86440 v Pennine Bridleway, Monks Road to High Lane, Charlesworth, Derbyshire Archaeological Landscape Survey, Evaluation and Watching Brief Report PENNINE BRIDLEWAY, MONK’S ROAD TO HIGH LANE,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Peak Sub Region
    Peak Sub Region Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment Final Report to Derbyshire Dales District Council, High Peak Borough Council and the Peak District National Park Authority June 2009 ekosgen Lawrence Buildings 2 Mount Street Manchester M2 5WQ TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................ 5 STUDY INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................. 5 OVERVIEW OF THE STUDY AREA ............................................................................................... 5 ROLE OF THE STUDY ................................................................................................................ 8 REPORT STRUCTURE.............................................................................................................. 10 2 SHLAA GUIDANCE AND STUDY METHODOLOGY..................................................... 12 SHLAA GUIDANCE................................................................................................................. 12 STUDY METHODOLOGY........................................................................................................... 13 3 POLICY CONTEXT.......................................................................................................... 18 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 18 NATIONAL, REGIONAL AND
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmaceutical Needs Assessment 2018-2021 2018-2021
    Pharmaceutical Needs Assessment 2018-2021 2018-2021 Produced by Derby City Public Health Department Knowledge, Intelligence & Strategic Planning This Pharmaceutical Needs Assessment has been produced for both Derby City Council and Derbyshire County Council Health & Wellbeing Boards. Pharmaceutical Needs Assessment 2018-2021 Acknowledgements The PNA Steering Group wishes to thank all the members of the public and wider stakeholders who participated in the consultation of this needs assessment. In addition, the Group would like to thank Charlotte Moore, Chris McManus, Leila Whiteley, Nicola Richmond and Sereena Raju for their valued contribution to the content of this PNA. It also wishes to acknowledge Derby City, Derbyshire County and District Local Authority Planning Departments for contributing the detail on future housing plans, to support the assessment of future need for community pharmacy across the area. A particular thank-you must be given to Andy Muirhead who has produced much of the content whilst also overseeing the production of the document as a whole, ensuring its timely and effective delivery. Finally, we would like to give special thanks to Graham Archer, Chief Officer, Derbyshire Local Pharmaceutical Committee (LPC), for his support in producing this and the previous two PNAs. This will be Graham’s last as he retires as Chief Officer. We wish you all the very best in your retirement Graham. Version Control Title Derby and Derbyshire Pharmaceutical Needs Assessment 2018-2021 Status Final document approved by Derby and
    [Show full text]
  • NOTICE of POLL Election of a Borough Councillor
    NOTICE OF POLL High Peak Election of a Borough Councillor for Barms Notice is hereby given that: 1. A poll for the election of a Borough Councillor for Barms will be held on Thursday 2 May 2019, between the hours of 7:00 am and 10:00 pm. 2. The number of Borough Councillors to be elected is one. 3. The names, home addresses and descriptions of the Candidates remaining validly nominated for election and the names of all persons signing the Candidates nomination paper are as follows: Names of Signatories Name of Candidate Home Address Description (if any) Proposers(+), Seconders(++) & Assentors BROOKE (Address in High Peak) The Conservative Party Christopher J Seddon Sandra M J Seddon Seb Candidate (+) (++) Faye Warren Alec H R Warren Patricia A Barnsley Elaine J Bonsell Roger Parker Elizabeth J Hill Robert L Mosley Edward A Hill MAYERS Flat 6, 2 Crescent The Green Party Rennie F. Leech (+) Francesca J Gregory Daniel David View, Hall Bank, Clare M Foster (++) Buxton, Derbyshire, Zoie-Echo Campbell Stacey N Mayer SK17 6EN Lenora Kaye Allan Smith Deborah R Walker John G. Walker Rachael Hodgkinson QUINN 45 Nunsfield Road, Labour Party Lisa J. Donnelly (+) David S. Donnelly (++) Rachael Buxton, Derbyshire, Collette Solibun Matthew A Sale SK17 7BW Pamela J Smart David J Jones Natasha Braithwaite Anita A Harwood Isobel G R Harwood Martin S Quinn 4. The situation of Polling Stations and the description of persons entitled to vote there are as follows: Station Ranges of electoral register numbers of Situation of Polling Station Number persons entitled to vote thereat Fairfield Methodist Church, Off Fairfield Road, Buxton 1 BA1-1 to BA1-652 Fairfield Methodist Church, Off Fairfield Road, Buxton 2 BA2-1 to BA2-751 5.
    [Show full text]
  • East Midlands
    East Midlands Initial proposals Contents Initial proposals summary .............................................................................. 3 1. What is the Boundary Commission for England? ........... 5 2. Background to the 2013 Review ...................................................... 6 3. Initial proposals for the East Midlands region ................... 9 Initial proposals for the Lincolnshire sub-region .................................................................. 9 Initial proposals for the Derbyshire sub-region ..................................................................... 10 Initial proposals for the Northamptonshire, Leicestershire, and Nottinghamshire sub-region ............................................................................................................................................ 11 4. How to have your say ................................................................................. 14 Annex: Initial proposals for constituencies, including wards and electorates ........................................................................................ 17 Glossary ............................................................................................................................ 33 Initial proposals summary Who we are and what we do of constituencies allocated to each sub- region is determined by the electorate of the The Boundary Commission for England is an combined local authorities. independent and impartial non-departmental public body which is responsible for reviewing
    [Show full text]
  • Derbyshire Dales and High Peak Joint Core Strategy 29
    Contents Non-Technical Summary 1 Introduction 4 2 Methodology 6 3 The Core Strategy and Key Sustainability Issues 8 4 Reasonable Alternatives Considered 12 5 Choice of Preferred Options 13 6 Likely Significant Effects of the Core Strategy 14 7 Recommendations 16 8 Implementation, Mitigation and Maximising Benefits 17 9 Monitoring 18 Introduction 10 Objectives and Structure of the SA Report 20 11 Compliance with the SEA Directive & Regulations 22 12 The Local Development Framework 25 13 Derbyshire Dales and High Peak Joint Core Strategy 29 Appraisal Methodology 14 How the Appraisal was carried out 31 15 Appraisal Timetable 35 Sustainability Issues 16 Review of Relevant Plans, Programmes and Policy Objectives 37 17 Baseline Data and Indicators 39 18 Difficulties and Limitations 40 19 The Core Strategy Area and Sustainability Issues 42 20 The SA Framework 50 Derbyshire Dales and High Peak Joint Core Strategy - Sustainability Appraisal Contents 21 Consultation 58 Reasonable Alternatives Considered and Choice of Preferred Options 22 Testing the Core Strategy Objectives 60 23 Appraisal of Alternative Options and Choice of Preferred Options 68 24 Choice of the Preferred Options 70 Sustainability Appraisal of Preferred Options 25 Predicting the Effects of the Preferred Options 80 26 Evaluating the Effects of the Preferred Options 81 27 Cumulative Effects 86 28 Implementation, Mitigation Measures and Maximising Benefits 87 29 Uncertainties and Risks 88 Monitoring Proposals 30 Monitoring Proposals 89 Appendices 1 Review of Relevant Plans, Programmes
    [Show full text]
  • Health and Well Being
    Contents 1 How the sustainability appraisal framework will be used 3 2 Purpose of this document 4 3 Stage 1A: Identifying other relevant policies, plans and programmes 5 National 5 Regional 5 Local 5 Key Messages 5 4 Stage A2: Collecting baseline information 7 National Overview 7 Regional Overview 7 Derbyshire Dales & High Peak 8 5 Stage A3:Identifying sustainability issues and problems 29 6 Stage A4: Developing the Sustainable Appraisal Framework 30 Sustainable development objectives 30 Indicators and monitoring data 30 Health and Well-Being Topic Paper April 2009 How the sustainability appraisal framework will be 1 used 1.1 The purpose of a Sustainability Appraisal is to appraise the social, environmental and economic effects of the proposed strategy and policy options of the Core Strategy. This must be done at the beginning to ensure that Derbyshire Dales District Council and High Peak Borough Council can make informed decisions that accord with sustainable development. 1.2 Sustainability objectives are used to test and ask questions for each strategy and policy option considered in the Core Strategy. The Sustainability Appraisal process has a number of set stages that must be followed, but can be reconsidered when new information is collected. 1.3 The development of the Sustainability Appraisal for the Derbyshire Dales and High Peak Core Strategy will follow guidance as set out in “Sustainability Appraisal of Regional Spatial Strategies and Local development Documents (2005)” published by the Department of Communities and Local Government. 1.4 This topic paper follows Stage A (Pre Production – Evidence Gathering) of the guidance which is undertaken during the pre-production stage of the joint Core Strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • HWR Chatsworth Paper Vsept07 Unformatted.Doc 28/07/2008
    HWR Chatsworth paper vSept07 unformatted.doc 28/07/2008 REGIONAL EVOLUTION OF A FLUVIODELTAIC CYCLIC SUCCESSION IN THE MARSDENIAN (LATE NAMURIAN STAGE, PENNSYLVANIAN) OF THE CENTRAL PENNINE BASIN, UK. 1 2 3 4 C.N. WATERS , J.I. CHISHOLM , A.C. BENFIELD and A.M. O’BEIRNE 1 British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG, UK [email protected] 2 4 Park Street, Loughborough, Leicestershire LE11 2EG, UK 3 24 Gascoigne Avenue, Barwick-in-Elmet, Leeds LS15 4LW, UK 4 32 Hemberton Road, London SW9 9LJ, UK SUMMARY: Basinwide analysis of sedimentary facies, isopachytes and palaeocurrents for two late Marsdenian (Pennsylvanian) sedimentary cycles within part of the Millstone Grit Group, has led to a new sequence-stratigraphic interpretation for the relationships between its constituent sandstone units (currently named Huddersfield White Rock, Chatsworth Grit, Brooksbottoms Grit, Holcombe Brook Grit, Brown Edge Flags and Redmires Flags). The Bilinguites superbilinguis (R2c1) and Verneulites sigma (R2c2) marine bands related to fourth-order marine highstands show faunal variations possibly reflecting fifth-order sea-level fluctuations. The lower R2c1 cycle consists entirely of deep water mudstone. The overlying R2c2 cycle shows an upward regressive passage through pro-delta and delta-slope deposits to mouthbar and channel sandstones. The latter comprises an ‘eastern inflow’ of northerly provenance, the distribution of which was not influenced by the underlying basement configuration, and a ‘southern inflow’ sourced from the Wales-Brabant High. Falling sea-levels resulted in progressive narrowing of the fluvial pathway within the main sandstone body of the ‘eastern inflow’, with a concomitant increase in flow velocities and grainsize.
    [Show full text]
  • Initial Proposals for New Parliamentary Constituency Boundaries in the East Midlands Contents
    Initial proposals for new Parliamentary constituency boundaries in the East Midlands Contents Summary 3 1 What is the Boundary Commission for England? 5 2 Background to the 2018 Review 7 3 Initial proposals for the East Midlands 11 Initial proposals for the Lincolnshire sub‑region 12 Initial proposals for the Derbyshire sub‑region 13 Initial proposals for the Nottinghamshire, Leicestershire, 14 Rutland and Northamptonshire sub‑region 4 How to have your say 19 Annex A: Initial proposals for constituencies, 23 including wards and electorates Glossary 39 Initial proposals for new Parliamentary constituency boundaries in the East Midlands 1 Summary Who we are and what we do What is changing in the East Midlands? The Boundary Commission for England is an independent and impartial The East Midlands has been allocated 44 non‑departmental public body which is constituencies – a reduction of two from responsible for reviewing Parliamentary the current number. constituency boundaries in England. Our proposals leave seven of the 46 The 2018 Review existing constituencies unchanged. We have the task of periodically reviewing As it has not always been possible to the boundaries of all the Parliamentary allocate whole numbers of constituencies constituencies in England. We are currently to individual counties, we have grouped conducting a review on the basis of rules some county and local authority areas set by Parliament in 2011. The rules tell into sub‑regions. The number of us that we must make recommendations constituencies allocated to each sub‑region for new Parliamentary constituency is determined by the electorate of the boundaries in September 2018. They combined local authorities.
    [Show full text]
  • Derbyshire Dales & High Peak Joint Housing Needs Survey
    DERBYSHIRE DALES & HIGH PEAK JOINT HOUSING NEEDS SURVEY COVERING THE PEAK SUB REGION FINAL REPORT MARCH 2007 E-Mail: [email protected] Page 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. INTRODUCTION: 3 A. Strategic context B. Scope of the report C. Structure of the report 2. SURVEY DESIGN, METHODOLOGY AND VALIDATION 11 3. A PROFILE OF HOUSEHOLDS IN THE SUB-REGION 21 4. PROBLEM HOUSING AND THE REMEDIES FOR IT 36 5. THE COSTS OF HOUSING 47 6. THE CURRENT AFFORDABILITY OF HOUSING 67 7. NEWLY ARISING NEED AND SUPPLY FORECASTS 82 8. THE OVERALL SCALE OF NEED – THE ASSESSMENT MODEL 107 9. THE MIX OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING REQUIRED 117 10. FUTURE DEMAND FOR MARKET HOUSING 134 11. RURAL KEY WORKERS 141 12. STRATEGIC PLANNING IMPLICATIONS 171 APPENDICES 1. Survey Response and Weighting 191 2. Population projections 2006-2016 192 3. The affordability propensity of newly forming households 195 4. Supply-side information 198 5. Additional information about key workers 211 6. Employers Key Worker Postal Survey 218 7. Resident-based Household Survey 222 John Herington Associates Page 3 SECTION 1. INTRODUCTION __________________________________________________ A. STRATEGIC CONTEXT 1.1 The East Midlands Regional Strategy makes clear that access to housing is an acute problem in much of the Peak Sub-Region, especially within the boundaries of the National Park. This arises from high levels of demand from people working outside the area and people moving to the Peak on retirement that push up the price of housing, combined with low levels of local incomes. A limited supply and low turnover of social housing, and a high incidence of second homes exacerbate this.
    [Show full text]
  • Derbyshire Dales Local Plan Pre Submission Draft Statement Of
    Derbyshire Dales Local Plan Pre Submission Draft Statement of Consultation June 2013 Contents 1. Introduction 2 2. Derbyshire Dales Core Strategy Topic Papers – 5 Stakeholder Workshops June 2007 – January 2008 3. Derbyshire Dales and High Peak Joint Core Strategy 9 Issues and Options, March – May 2009 4. Derbyshire Dales and High Peak Joint Core Strategy 1 Growth Options August – October 2009 5. Derbyshire Dales and High Peak Joint Core Strategy 14 Draft Plan June - July 2010 6. Derbyshire Dales and High Peak Joint Core Strategy 17 Community Conversations, June – July 2011 7. Transition from Derbyshire Dales and High Peak Joint Core Strategy to Derbyshire Dales Local Plan 8. Derbyshire Dales Local Plan Housing Issues and 22 Options and Settlement Framework Boundary Review, June - August 2012 9. Derbyshire Dales Local Plan Pre-Submission Draft, 25 June 2013 – July 2013 Appendix 1 – Consultation Leaflets 27 Appendix 2 – Derbyshire Dales Community Conversations 60 Comment Summary Outcomes Appendix 3 – List of Consultees for 2012 and 2013 66 Consultations Appendix 4 – Press Cuttings of Advertisements placed in 72 Local Press to Advertise the Housing Issues and Options/ Settlement Framework Boundary Review Consultations Summer 2012 Appendix 5 - Summary of Comments raised by Housing 84 Issues and Options and Settlement Framework Boundary Review Consultations Summer 2012 1 1. Introduction 1.1 This statement has been prepared to demonstrate how the District Council has involved the public and other stakeholders in the during the preparation of the Derbyshire Dales Local Plan. 1.2 This statement has also been prepared to comply with the requirements of Regulation 22 of The Town and Country Planning (Local Planning) (England) Regulations 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Off Simmondley Lane, Glossop Derbyshire
    Land off Simmondley Lane, Glossop Derbyshire Written Scheme of Investigation for Archaeological Watching Brief Prepared for: ESE Project Management Little Hollins Chapel-en-le-Frith High Peak SK23 9UF Prepared by: Wessex Archaeology Unit 6 Sheaf Bank Business Park Prospect Road Sheffield S2 3EN www.wessexarch.co.uk February 2017 T22980.01 © Wessex Archaeology Ltd 2017, all rights reserved Wessex Archaeology Ltd is a Registered Charity No. 287786 (England & Wales) and SC042630 (Scotland) Land off Simmondley Lane, Glossop, Derbyshire WSI for Archaeological Watching Brief Quality Assurance Project Code T22980 Accession N/A Client N/A Code Ref. Planning HPK/2016/0010 Ordnance Survey 449055, 165910 Application (OS) national grid Ref. reference (NGR) Version Status* Prepared by Checked and Approver’s Signature Date Approved By v01 I RAD 08/02/17 File: S:\Tenders\T22980_WSI-V01.doc v02 E RAD CS 09/02/2017 File: S:\Tenders\T22980\WSI\v2 v03 E RAD CS 10/02/2017 File: S:\Tenders\T22980\WSI\v3 File: File: * I = Internal Draft; E = External Draft; F = Final DISCLAIMER THE MATERIAL CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT WAS DESIGNED AS AN INTEGRAL PART OF A REPORT TO AN INDIVIDUAL CLIENT AND WAS PREPARED SOLELY FOR THE BENEFIT OF THAT CLIENT. THE MATERIAL CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT DOES NOT NECESSARILY STAND ON ITS OWN AND IS NOT INTENDED TO NOR SHOULD IT BE RELIED UPON BY ANY THIRD PARTY. TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW WESSEX ARCHAEOLOGY WILL NOT BE LIABLE BY REASON OF BREACH OF CONTRACT NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE (WHETHER DIRECT INDIRECT OR CONSEQUENTIAL) OCCASIONED TO ANY PERSON ACTING OR OMITTING TO ACT OR REFRAINING FROM ACTING IN RELIANCE UPON THE MATERIAL CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT ARISING FROM OR CONNECTED WITH ANY ERROR OR OMISSION IN THE MATERIAL CONTAINED IN THE REPORT.
    [Show full text]
  • Derbyshire Dales and High Peak Joint Core Strategy - Draft Plan
    Derbyshire Dales and High Peak Joint Core Strategy - Draft Plan Local Development Framework Derbyshire Dales and High Peak Joint Core Strategy - Draft Plan Contents 1 Introduction 3 2 Portrait of the Derbyshire Dales and High Peak 8 3 Spatial Vision, Aims and Objectives 18 4 The Spatial Strategy 25 5 Protecting Peak District Character 32 6 Supporting the Rural Economy and Enhancing Prosperity 44 7 Promoting Healthy and Sustainable Communities 60 8 Sub Area Strategies 80 9 Implementation and Monitoring 121 10 Glossary 156 Core Strategy Policies Core Strategy Policy CS 1 Sustainable Development Principles 26 Core Strategy Policy CS 2 Settlement Hierarchy 28 Core Strategy Policy CS 3 Landscape Character 35 Core Strategy Policy CS 4 Biodiversity 36 Core Strategy Policy CS 5 Design Quality 38 Core Strategy Policy CS 6 Built and Historic Environment 40 Core Strategy Policy CS 7 Green Infrastructure 43 Core Strategy Policy CS 8 Maintaining and Enhancing an Economic Base 48 Core Strategy Policy CS 9 Regenerating an Industrial Legacy 50 Core Strategy Policy CS 10 Countryside Development 51 Core Strategy Policy CS 11 Promoting Peak District Tourism and Culture 53 Core Strategy Policy CS 12 Retail and Town Centres 57 Core Strategy Policy CS 13 Strategic Housing Development 61 Core Strategy Policy CS 14 Affordable Housing 65 Core Strategy Policy CS 15 Exception Sites 66 Core Strategy Policy CS 16 Gypsies, Travellers and Travelling Show People 67 Core Strategy Policy CS 17 Climate Change 70 Core Strategy Policy CS 18 Provision of Open Space and Recreation
    [Show full text]