DOCSLIB.ORG

The Gallipoli Campaign Learning from a Mismatch of Strategic Ends and Means

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Gallipoli Campaign Learning from a Mismatch of Strategic Ends and Means British battleship HMS Irresistible abandoned and sinking, having been shattered by explosion of floating mine in Dardanelles during attack on Narrows’ Forts, March 18, 1915 (Royal Navy/Library of Congress) The Gallipoli Campaign Learning from a Mismatch of Strategic Ends and Means By Raymond Adams orld War I began on July 28, and relatively inexpensive in terms of tactics in response to new, highly de- 1914, 1 month after the assas- blood and treasure. Almost immediately, structive weapons, resulting in massive Wsination of Archduke Franz however, the combatants faced each other casualties. Rising calls from British po- Ferdinand, heir-apparent to the Austro- in a long line of static defensive trenches. litical leaders, the media, and the public Hungarian throne.1 Most Europeans The Western Front quickly became a demanded action to break the stalemate. expected the conflict to be short—“over killing ground of unprecedented violence British strategists responded by opening by Christmas” was a common refrain— in human history: combined British, a new front in the east with two strategic French, and German casualties totaled objectives: drive Turkey out of the war 2,057,621 by January 1915.2 by attacking Constantinople, and open 3 Lieutenant Colonel Raymond Adams, USMCR, is a The character of war had changed. a route to beleaguered ally Russia. The student at the National War College. Armies had not changed their battlefield decision to open a second front in the 96 Recall / The Gallipoli Campaign JFQ 79, 4th Quarter 2015 east in 1915 ultimately failed to achieve military officers to plan for the seizure Flawed Assumptions Britain’s strategic objectives during the of the Gallipoli Peninsula, “with a view Underpinning the first full year of World War I. British to admitting a British Fleet to the Sea British Strategy leaders pursued short-term, politically of Marmara” and eventually knocking The British designed their Dardanelles expedient military objectives in Turkey Turkey out of the war.9 Representatives plan on a series of faulty assumptions. that were both ancillary to their military of the War Office and the Admiralty Political leaders and military planners expertise and contrary to achieving the met and concluded that an attack on the alike assumed the Turks were deficient overall ends of winning the war by defeat- Gallipoli Peninsula was not a militarily in martial skill, grit, and determina- ing Germany. This article examines the feasible operation.10 Director of Military tion.19 Churchill displayed unbridled disastrous results of the attempt to open a Operations Major General Charles confidence in the ability of naval bom- second front and the disconnect between Callwell11 presciently observed that a bardment to destroy land targets.20 Allied strategic ends and means. campaign in Gallipoli was “likely to prove British war planners assumed that the an extremely difficult operation of war.”12 battle fleet would easily breach the Genesis of the He proffered that an operation in the enemy’s coastal defenses, float directly Dardanelles Decision Dardanelles would require a force of not to Constantinople, and seize the straits With combat in France and Belgium less than 60,000, with strong siege artil- without requiring a landing force. characterized by hopeless direct assaults lery, echeloned into Turkey in two large Kitchener assumed that, once through on entrenched enemy positions, British waves.13 Kitchener also disagreed with the straits, with naval guns pointing strategists began planning for a new opening a second front, but for different at Constantinople, the fleet would direction.4 First Lord of the Admi- reasons. He was reluctant to divert troops “compel Turkey’s capitulation, secure ralty Winston Churchill contemplated from the continent, which he viewed as a supply route to hard-pressed Russia, amphibious operations in the North Sea the primary focus of effort for the British. and inspire the Balkan states to join to increase pressure on Germany. He A dichotomy of opinion thus emerged: the Allied war effort and eventually to proposed a joint Anglo-French amphib- the politicians advocated for a second front attack Austro-Hungary, thereby pressur- ious assault along the Belgian coast on the Gallipoli Peninsula, while senior ing Germany.”21 designed to outflank German positions military officers argued against interven- Kitchener further assumed that on the Western Front, liberate the port tion in Turkey.14 The debate continued once news of the arrival of the British of Zeebrugge, and prevent Germany into winter. The dynamic changed on fleet reached Constantinople, the entire from using Zeebrugge and Ostende as January 1, 1915, when Russia formally Turkish army in Thrace would retreat, submarine bases.5 Ultimately, the British requested a “naval or military demonstra- leaving Turkey to British control.22 Sir failed to convince the French to par- tion against the Turks to ease the pressure Edward Grey, Secretary of State for ticipate, effectively scuttling Churchill’s caused by the Turkish offensive driving Foreign Affairs, argued that once the fleet North Sea plan. through the Caucasus Mountains.”15 moved through the Dardanelles, “a coup British political and military leaders British decisionmakers debated the d’état would occur in Constantinople, next focused attention on Turkey and the Russian request and the larger issue of the whereby Turkey would abandon the possibility of military operations to seize future strategic direction of the war effort Central Powers and join the Entente.”23 the Dardanelles,6 attack Constantinople, during a series of War Council meetings in All of the foregoing assumptions proved and open a line of communication to early January.16 The council decided that false, and their cumulative effect fore- Russia. Secretary of the War Cabinet the British would continue to fight side ordained the Dardanelles operation to Maurice Hankey, Chancellor of the by side with France on the Western Front, disaster. Exchequer David Lloyd George, and and the Admiralty would, commencing in Churchill advocated military operations February 1915, prepare operations “to in- Naval Operations in against Turkey on the Gallipoli Peninsula.7 vade and take the Gallipoli Peninsula, with the Dardanelles They agreed that the Ottoman Empire Constantinople as its objective.”17 British naval forces shelled the forts was weak and that “Germany [could] per- Bureaucratic maneuvering and ne- at the entrance of the Dardanelles on haps be struck most effectively, and with gotiation were thus necessary to reach November 1, 1914, well before the the most lasting results on the peace of the a decision to launch the operation. The formal commencement of the Gallipoli world through her allies, and particularly next major task for senior British leaders campaign. The purpose of the attack through Turkey.”8 Thus, within weeks was designing the strategy to implement was more to punish Turkey for siding of the outbreak of war, British attention the War Council’s decisions. The final with the Triple Alliance than an attempt turned east. plan would call for a combined force of to secure the strait. The shelling had At the end of August 1914, Churchill six British and four French battleships, ac- a more pernicious effect, alerting the formally requested that Secretary of companied by a substantial naval escort, Turkish defenders that a future mili- State for War Field Marshal Herbert to push through the Dardanelles and tary operation in the Dardanelles by Kitchener organize a group of naval and fight to Constantinople.18 the British was likely. Mustafa Kamal JFQ 79, 4th Quarter 2015 Adams 97 force of British, Australian, New Zea- lander, and French troops. Hamilton faced a challenge of epic proportions. His task was to conduct the first opposed amphibious landing in an era of high-powered defensive weapons that included innovations such as the machine gun and highly accurate artillery firing a new generation of high explosives.30 At dawn on April 25, 1915, British, Dominion, and Allied forces waded ashore onto six landing beaches at Cape Helles.31 Amphibious operations contin- ued for 8 months, but the Allies never gained more than a foothold on the peninsula. The campaign to outflank the stalemate on the Western Front ironi- cally began to resemble the fighting in France and Belgium, although on a much smaller scale, with Hamilton committing his troops against an entrenched and forewarned foe at Gallipoli.32 Although Australian troops charging near Turkish trench, just before evacuation at Anzac, ca. 1915 (U.S. Kitchener and Hamilton recognized that National Archives and Records Administration) a central assumption about the Turks— that they were a second-rate fighting Attaturk, overall Turkish commander at Council to delay further naval action force that did not stand a chance against Gallipoli, and Otto Liman von Sanders, immediately. British arms—was clearly wrong, they did a German general and military advisor The council charted a new course not change course.33 In fairness to British to Turkey, focused on fortifying the and called for landing troops in a beach- military commanders, a major reason for Dardanelles after the British attack of hopping campaign from the Aegean to continuing the operation was political November 1.24 The Anglo-French naval the Sea of Marmara, eventually attacking expediency.34 David Fromkin observes, force attacked the Dardanelles in force Constantinople.29 However, 38 days “Constantinople and the Dardanelles,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Letters from the First World War, 1915 Training
    Letters from the First World War, 1915 Training Letters from the First World War, 1915 These are some of the many letters sent by staff of the Great Western These are some of the many letters sent by staff of the Great Western Railway Audit office at Paddington who had enlisted to fight in the First World War. Here you will find all the letters and transcripts from this collection that relate to the soldiers' experience of training in England before they were sent abroad. 1915, Training: Contents Training: ‘do you like the photo?’ .............................................................................................. 2 Training: ‘drill before breakfast’ ................................................................................................. 3 Training: ‘no signs of moving’ ..................................................................................................... 6 Training: ‘We are now fully equipped’ ..................................................................................... 7 1 http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/education/ Letters from the First World War, 1915 Training Training: ‘do you like the photo?’ Harold George Giles, 17 May 1915, Churn Camp, Oxford, England. Born: 18 May 1898, Joined GWR: 7 August 1912, Joined up for service: 19 March 1915, Regiment: Royal Bucks Hussars, Regiment number:2125; 205745, Rank: Private, Retired: Resigned from Audit office on 9 May 1920 Transcript Dear Mr Jones Just a line to let you know that I’m still alive and am moving to King’s Lynn on Wednesday next. Will write you later. How do you like the photo? Best regards to the office. From, H. Giles 2 http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/education/ Letters from the First World War, 1915 Training Training: ‘drill before breakfast’ Arthur Smith, 4 April 1915, France. Born: 8 March 1895, Regiment: Railway Troop, Royal Engineers, Regiment number: 87760, Rank: Lance Corporal Transcript Dear Sir, I have now been out in France a fortnight.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Britain. Foreign Office. Wellington House Publications
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c86m3dcm No online items Inventory of the Great Britain. Foreign Office. Wellington House publications Finding aid prepared by Trevor Wood Hoover Institution Library and Archives © 2008, 2014 434 Galvez Mall Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305-6003 [email protected] URL: http://www.hoover.org/library-and-archives Inventory of the Great Britain. XX230 1 Foreign Office. Wellington House publications Title: Great Britain. Foreign Office. Wellington House publications Date (inclusive): 1914-1918 Collection Number: XX230 Contributing Institution: Hoover Institution Library and Archives Language of Material: English Physical Description: 13 manuscript boxes, 5 card file boxes, 1 cubic foot box(6.2 Linear Feet) Abstract: Books, pamphlets, and miscellany, relating to World War I and British participation in it. Card file drawers at the Hoover Institution Library & Archives describe this collection. Hoover Institution Library & Archives Access The collection is open for research; materials must be requested at least two business days in advance of intended use. Publication Rights For copyright status, please contact the Hoover Institution Library & Archives. Acquisition Information Acquired by the Hoover Institution Library & Archives Preferred Citation [Identification of item], Great Britain. Foreign Office. Wellington House publications, [Box no., Folder no. or title], Hoover Institution Library & Archives. Historical Note Propaganda section of the British Foreign Office. Scope and Content of Collection Books, pamphlets, and miscellany, relating to World War I and British participation in it. Subjects and Indexing Terms World War, 1914-1918 -- Propaganda Propaganda, British World War, 1914-1918 -- Great Britain box 1 "The Achievements of the Zeppelins." By a Swede.
    [Show full text]
  • Tentative Lists Submitted by States Parties As of 15 April 2021, in Conformity with the Operational Guidelines
    World Heritage 44 COM WHC/21/44.COM/8A Paris, 4 June 2021 Original: English UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION CONVENTION CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF THE WORLD CULTURAL AND NATURAL HERITAGE WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE Extended forty-fourth session Fuzhou (China) / Online meeting 16 – 31 July 2021 Item 8 of the Provisional Agenda: Establishment of the World Heritage List and of the List of World Heritage in Danger 8A. Tentative Lists submitted by States Parties as of 15 April 2021, in conformity with the Operational Guidelines SUMMARY This document presents the Tentative Lists of all States Parties submitted in conformity with the Operational Guidelines as of 15 April 2021. • Annex 1 presents a full list of States Parties indicating the date of the most recent Tentative List submission. • Annex 2 presents new Tentative Lists (or additions to Tentative Lists) submitted by States Parties since 16 April 2019. • Annex 3 presents a list of all sites included in the Tentative Lists of the States Parties to the Convention, in alphabetical order. Draft Decision: 44 COM 8A, see point II I. EXAMINATION OF TENTATIVE LISTS 1. The World Heritage Convention provides that each State Party to the Convention shall submit to the World Heritage Committee an inventory of the cultural and natural sites situated within its territory, which it considers suitable for inscription on the World Heritage List, and which it intends to nominate during the following five to ten years. Over the years, the Committee has repeatedly confirmed the importance of these Lists, also known as Tentative Lists, for planning purposes, comparative analyses of nominations and for facilitating the undertaking of global and thematic studies.
    [Show full text]
  • World War I Timeline C
    6.2.1 World War I Timeline c June 28, 1914 Austrian Archduke Franz Ferdinand and his wife Sophia are killed by Serbian nationalists. July 26, 1914 Austria declares war on Serbia. Russia, an ally of Serbia, prepares to enter the war. July 29, 1914 Austria invades Serbia. August 1, 1914 Germany declares war on Russia. August 3, 1914 Germany declares war on France. August 4, 1914 German army invades neutral Belgium on its way to attack France. Great Britain declares war on Germany. As a colony of Britain, Canada is now at war. Prime Minister Robert Borden calls for a supreme national effort to support Britain, and offers assistance. Canadians rush to enlist in the military. August 6, 1914 Austria declares war on Russia. August 12, 1914 France and Britain declare war on Austria. October 1, 1914 The first Canadian troops leave to be trained in Britain. October – November 1914 First Battle of Ypres, France. Germany fails to reach the English Channel. 1914 – 1917 The two huge armies are deadlocked along a 600-mile front of Deadlock and growing trenches in Belgium and France. For four years, there is little change. death tolls Attack after attack fails to cross enemy lines, and the toll in human lives grows rapidly. Both sides seek help from other allies. By 1917, every continent and all the oceans of the world are involved in this war. February 1915 The first Canadian soldiers land in France to fight alongside British troops. April - May 1915 The Second Battle of Ypres. Germans use poison gas and break a hole through the long line of Allied trenches.
    [Show full text]
  • Gallipoli Campaign
    tHe GaLlIpOlI CaMpAiGn The Gallipoli Campaign was an attack on the Gallipoli peninsula during World War I, between 25 April 1915 and 9 January 1916. The Gallipoli peninsula was an important tactical position during World War I. The British War Council suggested that Germany could be defeated by attacks on her allies, Austria, Hungary and Turkey. The Allied forces of the British Empire (including Australia and New Zealand) aimed to force a passage through the Dardanelles Strait and capture the Turkish capital, Constantinople. At dawn on 25 April 1915, Anzac assault troops landed north of Gaba Tepe, at what became known as Anzac Cove, while the British forces landed at Cape Helles on the Gallipoli Peninsula. The campaign was a brave but costly failure. By December 1915 plans were drawn up to evacuate the entire force from Gallipoli. On 19 and 20 December, the evacuation of over 142,000 men from Anzac Cove commenced and was completed three weeks later with minimal casualties. In total, the whole Gallipoli campaign caused 26,111 Australian casualties, including 8,141 deaths. Since 1916 the anniversary of the landings on 25 April has been commemorated as Anzac Day, becoming one of the most important national celebrations in Australia and New Zealand. tHe GaLlIpOlI CaMpAiGn The Gallipoli Campaign was an attack on the Gallipoli peninsula during World War I, between 25 April 1915 and 9 January 1916. The Gallipoli peninsula was an important tactical position during World War I. The British War Council suggested that Germany could be defeated by attacks on her allies, Austria, Hungary and Turkey.
    [Show full text]
  • Separating Fact from Fiction in the Aiolian Migration
    hesperia yy (2008) SEPARATING FACT Pages399-430 FROM FICTION IN THE AIOLIAN MIGRATION ABSTRACT Iron Age settlementsin the northeastAegean are usuallyattributed to Aioliancolonists who journeyed across the Aegean from mainland Greece. This articlereviews the literary accounts of the migration and presentsthe relevantarchaeological evidence, with a focuson newmaterial from Troy. No onearea played a dominantrole in colonizing Aiolis, nor is sucha widespread colonizationsupported by the archaeologicalrecord. But the aggressive promotionof migrationaccounts after the PersianWars provedmutually beneficialto bothsides of theAegean and justified the composition of the Delian League. Scholarlyassessments of habitation in thenortheast Aegean during the EarlyIron Age are remarkably consistent: most settlements are attributed toAiolian colonists who had journeyed across the Aegean from Thessaly, Boiotia,Akhaia, or a combinationof all three.1There is no uniformityin theancient sources that deal with the migration, although Orestes and his descendantsare named as theleaders in mostaccounts, and are credited withfounding colonies over a broadgeographic area, including Lesbos, Tenedos,the western and southerncoasts of theTroad, and theregion betweenthe bays of Adramyttion and Smyrna(Fig. 1). In otherwords, mainlandGreece has repeatedly been viewed as theagent responsible for 1. TroyIV, pp. 147-148,248-249; appendixgradually developed into a Mountjoy,Holt Parker,Gabe Pizzorno, Berard1959; Cook 1962,pp. 25-29; magisterialstudy that is includedhere Allison Sterrett,John Wallrodt, Mal- 1973,pp. 360-363;Vanschoonwinkel as a companionarticle (Parker 2008). colm Wiener, and the anonymous 1991,pp. 405-421; Tenger 1999, It is our hope that readersinterested in reviewersfor Hesperia. Most of trie pp. 121-126;Boardman 1999, pp. 23- the Aiolian migrationwill read both articlewas writtenin the Burnham 33; Fisher2000, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Women Physicians Serving in Serbia, 1915-1917: the Story of Dorothea Maude
    MUMJ History of Medicine 53 HISTORY OF MEDICINE Women Physicians Serving in Serbia, 1915-1917: The Story of Dorothea Maude Marianne P. Fedunkiw, BSc, MA, PhD oon after the start of the First World War, hundreds of One country which benefited greatly from their persistence British women volunteered their expertise , as physi - was Serbia. 2 Many medical women joined established cians, nurses, and in some cases simply as civilians groups such as the Serbian Relief Fund 3 units or the Scottish who wanted to help, to the British War Office . The War Women’s Hospital units set up by Scottish physician Dr. SOffice declined their offer, saying it was too dangerous. The Elsie Inglis. 4 Other, smaller, organized units included those women were told they could be of use taking over the duties which came to be known by the names of their chief physi - of men who had gone to the front, but their skills, intelli - cian or their administrators, including Mrs. Stobart’s Unit, gence and energy were not required at the front lines. Lady Paget’s Unit or The Berry Mission . Many of these This did not deter these women. They went on their own. women wrote their own accounts of their service .5 Still other women went over independently. Dr. Dorothea Clara Maude (1879-1959) was just such a woman. Born near Oxford, educated at University of Oxford and Trinity College, Dublin and trained at London’s Royal Free Hospital, she left her Oxford practice in July 1915 to join her first field unit in northern Serbia.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkomans Between Two Empires
    TURKOMANS BETWEEN TWO EMPIRES: THE ORIGINS OF THE QIZILBASH IDENTITY IN ANATOLIA (1447-1514) A Ph.D. Dissertation by RIZA YILDIRIM Department of History Bilkent University Ankara February 2008 To Sufis of Lāhijan TURKOMANS BETWEEN TWO EMPIRES: THE ORIGINS OF THE QIZILBASH IDENTITY IN ANATOLIA (1447-1514) The Institute of Economics and Social Sciences of Bilkent University by RIZA YILDIRIM In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY BILKENT UNIVERSITY ANKARA February 2008 I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History. …………………….. Assist. Prof. Oktay Özel Supervisor I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History. …………………….. Prof. Dr. Halil Đnalcık Examining Committee Member I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History. …………………….. Prof. Dr. Ahmet Yaşar Ocak Examining Committee Member I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History. …………………….. Assist. Prof. Evgeni Radushev Examining Committee Member I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History.
    [Show full text]
  • With the Judeans in the Palestine Campaign the Macmillan Company Kbwyork • Boston • Chicago • Daixas Atlanta • San Francisco
    ^^0^ ^(y a' ^0^ o^, *. ^V ^q,/*Tr.-* ^<^/o ^-^^ .o^\i^:.'/%''"'-^'''' 1--•^^ c\. "^0'^ o. %-!-:.-.- *« 'i;' vV <^ ''o ^^-n^A. ,0 * " A*^ '^<,.''*'o,T** .0^ \^ *^^^'* '^<^"*-o.?*' .0^ ^• ^^M^^ o\ />*^<^ •; '^^ 5>^ •!nL% Ik A? * > .0^ '"^-. ^^ ^^ * \<,^' ' > 4.*' ''*^_ <p^ .1-4-*' ..• -• ..I'^L', .'.^ia' % " ' *-./ - "'^.c.^^ WITH THE JUDEANS IN THE PALESTINE CAMPAIGN THE MACMILLAN COMPANY KBWYORK • BOSTON • CHICAGO • DAIXAS ATLANTA • SAN FRANCISCO MACMILLAN & CO.. Limited LONDON • BOMBAY • CALCUTTA MELBOURNE THE MACMILLAN CO. OP CANADA. Ltd. TORONTO PHYSICAL MAP OF PALESTINE Scale of miles 6 10 20 40 60 80 100 Scale of kilometres 6 10 20 40 GO 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 WITH THE JUDEANS IN THE PALESTINE CAMPAIGN BY LIEUT.-COLONEL J. H. PATTERSON, D.S.C. AUTHOR OF "the MAN-EATERS OF TSAVo/' "iN THE GRIP OF THE NYIKa/' "wITH THE ZIONISTS IN GALLIPOH" THE MACMILLAN COMPANY 1922 All rights reserved PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. 1\^'. ^'^.y' Copyright, 1922, By the MACMILLAN COMPANY. Set up and electrotyped. Published, November, 1922. FERRIS PRINTING COMPANY NEW YORK CITY -6 DEC '22 C1A692250 PREFACE THE formation of a Battalion of Jews for service in the British Army is an event with: out precedent in our annals, and the part played by such a unique unit is assured of a niche in history, owing to the fact that it fought in Palestine, not only for the British cause, but also for the Restoration of the Jewish people to the Promised Land. In writing the following- narrative, my object has been to give a faithful account of the doings of this Jewish Battalion while it was under my command.
    [Show full text]
  • The London Gazette, 5 February, 1915
    1252 THE LONDON GAZETTE, 5 FEBRUARY, 1915. on the 29th day of October, 1910), are, on or before died in or about the month of September, 1913), are, the 10th day of March, 1915, to send by post, pre- on or before the 9th day of March, 1915, to send by- paid, to Mr. William Edward Farr, a member of the post, prepaid;, to° Mr. H. A. "Carter, of the firm, of firm of Messrs. Booth, Wade, Farr and Lomas- Messrs. Eallowes and Carter, of 39, Bedford-row, Walker, of Leeds, the Solicitors of the defendant, London, W.C., the Solicitor of ,the defendant, Charles Mary Matilda Ingham (the wife of Henry Ingham), Daniel William Edward Brown, the executor of the the administratrix of the estate of the said Eli deceased, their Christian and surname, addresses and Dalton, deceased, their Christian and surnames, descriptions, the full parfcieuJars of their claims, a addresses and descriptions1, the full particulars of statement of (their accounts, and the mature of the their claims, a statement of their accounts, and the securities (if any) held by them, or in default thereof nature of the securities (if any) -held by them, or in they will be peremptorily excluded from it-he* benefit of default thereof they will be peremptorily excluded the said order. Every creditor holding any security is from the benefit of the said judgment. Every credi- to produce the same at the Chambers of the said tor holding any security is to produce the same at Judge, Room No. 696, Royal 'Courts of Justice, the Chambers of Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Master Thesis Set out to Find out What Kind of Picture of Egypt the British Military Personnel Portrayed to Their Friends and Family Back at Home
    Nuancing the picture of Egypt A study of how Egypt was portrayed home by British military personnel during the First World War University of Bergen Master’s thesis Department of Archaeology, History, Cultural Studies and Religion Autumn 2020 Sigrid Buhaug Kluck 1 Table of contents Sammendrag ............................................................................................................................................. 4 Preface ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 Chapter 1: Introduction and methodology................................................................................................. 6 Methodology and sources .................................................................................................................................. 10 Letters ................................................................................................................................................................ 13 Postcards ........................................................................................................................................................... 15 Photographs ....................................................................................................................................................... 16 Chapter 2: Historical background ........................................................................................................... 18 Egypt 1869-1914
    [Show full text]
  • The Great War Began at the End of July 1914 with the Triple Entente
    ANZAC SURGEONS OF GALLIPOLI The Great War began at the end of July 1914 with the Triple Entente (Britain, France and Russia) aligned against the Triple Alliance (Germany, Austria- Hungary and Italy). By December, the Alliance powers had been joined by the Ottoman Turks; and in January 1915 the Russians, pressured by German and Turkish forces in the Caucasus, asked the British to open up another front. Hamilton second from right: There is nothing certain about war except that one side won’t win. AWM H10350 A naval campaign against Turkey was devised by the British The Turkish forces Secretary of State for War Lord Kitchener and the First Sea Lord, Winston Churchill. In 1913, Enver Pasha became Minister of War and de-facto Commander in Chief of the Turkish forces. He commanded It was intended that allied ships would destroy Turkish the Ottoman Army in 1914 when they were defeated by fortifications and open up the Straits of the Dardanelles, thus the Russians at the Battle of Sarikamiş and also forged the enabling the capture of Constantinople. alliance with Germany in 1914. In March 1915 he handed over control of the Ottoman 5th army to the German General Otto Liman von Sanders. It was intended that allied Von Sanders recognised the allies could not take Constantinople without a combined land and sea attack. ships would destroy Turkish In his account of the campaign, he commented on the small force of 60,000 men under his command but noted: The fortifications British gave me four weeks before their great landing.
    [Show full text]