DOCSLIB.ORG

Belarus Facing Dual Enlargement: Will the EU Squeeze Harder?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Belarus Facing Dual Enlargement: Will the EU Squeeze Harder? FOI-R—0859—SE May 2003 ISSN 1650-1942 Base data report Vyachaslau Paznyak Belarus Facing Dual Enlargement: Will the EU Squeeze Harder? Defence Analysis SE-172 90 Stockholm SWEDISH DEFENCE RESEARCH AGENCY FOI-R—0859—SE Defence Analysis May 2003 SE-172 90 Stockholm ISSN 1650-1942 Base data report Vyachaslau Paznyak Belarus Facing Dual Enlargement: Will the EU Squeeze Harder? Issuing organization Report number, ISRN Report type FOI – Swedish Defence Research Agency FOI-R—0859—SE Base data report Defence Analysis Research area code SE-172 90 Stockholm 1. Defence and Security Policy Month year Project no. May 2003 A 1101 Customers code 1. Research for the Government Sub area code 11 Defence Research for the Government Author/s (editor/s) Project manager Vyachaslau Paznyak Approved by Scientifically and technically responsible Report title Belarus Facing Dual Enlargement: Will the EU Squeeze Harder? Abstract (not more than 200 words) EU and NATO eastern enlargement raises a host of difficult issues for Belarus, the solution of which requires enhanced cooperation and financial and technical assistance, first of all in the meeting of new security challenges, the modernization of the border infrastructure and preparing a multilateral package of readmission agreements. A positive change in relations between Belarus and the EU/NATO depends on Belarus’ turn to democratic and market economic reforms. The dual enlargement has embraced also the OSCE and other European organizations, which promote institutional change by spreading common values, norms and practices. Paradoxically, Belarus relations with NATO have for some time looked better than those with the EU, even though they do not go beyond cooperation on “second-order” programs. Belarus has yet to accept the realities of the post-Cold War settlement in Europe. It has remained the last European country in a “state of war” with the West, whereas its union partner Russia concluded a “peace treaty” with NATO by signing the 1997 Founding Act and moved further towards a strategic partnership by instituting the NATO–Russia Council in May 2002. Belarusian authorities should acknowledge that a military response to the NATO “threat” is pointless. EU enlargement is a more comprehensive challenge than NATO enlargement. Keywords Belarus, EU, NATO, Russia, Poland, Lithuania, TACIS, borders, trade, migration, crime, energy Further bibliographic information Language English ISSN 1650-1942 Pages 75 p. Price acc. to pricelist Security classification Utgivare Rapportnummer, ISRNKlassificering Totalförsvarets Forskningsinstitut - FOI FOI-R—0859—SE Underlagsrapport Försvarsanalys Forskningsområde 172 90 Stockholm 1. Försvar- och säkerhetspolitik Månad, år Projektnummer Maj 2003 A 1101 Verksamhetsgren 1. Forskning för regeringens behov Delområde 11 Försvarsforskning för regeringens behov Författare/redaktör Projektledare Jan Leijonhielm Vyachaslau Paznyak Godkänd av Tekniskt och/eller vetenskapligt ansvarig Rapportens titel (i översättning) Vitryssland inför östutvidgningarna: Kommer EU att pressa hårdare? Sammanfattning (högst 200 ord) Östutvidgningen av NATO och EU reser en rad svåra problem för Vitryssland, vilkas lösning kräver ökat samarbete och finansiellt-tekniskt bistånd, främst i att möta nya säkerhetshot, modernisera gränsernas infrastruktur och underteckna ett multilateralt paket av avtal om återtagande av flyktingar. En positiv förändring i relationerna mellan Vitryssland och NATO/EU förutsätter att Vitryssland inleder demokratiska och marknadsekonomiska reformer. Den dubbla utvidgningen har också omfattat OSSE och andra europeiska institutioner, som befrämjar institutionellla förändringar genom att sprida gemensamma värderingar, normer och praxis. Paradoxalt nog har Vitrysslands relationer med NATO under några år sett bättre ut än med EU, även om de bara omfattar samarbete om sekundära program. Vitryssland har ännu inte accepterat realiteten av situationen i Europa efter det kalla kriget. Det har förblivit det enda europeiska land som har ”krigstillstånd” med väst, medan dess unionspartner Ryssland slöt ett ”fredsavtal” med NATO genom Founding Act 1997 och gick vidare mot strategiskt partnerskap genom att bilda NATO-Rysslandsrådet i maj 2002. Vitryska myndigheter torde se att ett militärt svar på ”hotet” från NATO är poänglöst. EU:s utvidgning är en mer omfattande utmaning än NATO-utvidgningen. Nyckelord Vitryssland, EU, NATO, Ryssland, Polen, Litauen, TACIS, gränser, handel, migration, brott, energi Övriga bibliografiska uppgifter Språk Engelska ISSN 1650-1942 Antal sidor: 75 s. Distribution enligt missiv Pris: Enligt prislista Sekretess Preface Since its emergence as an independent state in 1991 Belarus has largely been unknown to or disregarded by the Western public. However, with the eastern enlargement of NATO and EU reaching the borders of Belarus, the country has attracted growing attention, especially from its neighbors on the Baltic Sea. The political regime in Belarus and its reaction to the dual enlargement are in fact unique in the region. The publication of this report is intended to contribute to the understanding of the current security problems concerning Belarus and to stimulate discussion primarily in Sweden. The report analyses the official policy of Belarus with regard to the dual enlargement and the effects of the enlargement on its relations with Russia in a comparative perspective. It contains a wealth of factual information and assessments, based as it is on many sources, mainly Belarusian and Western websites, newspapers, scientific journals and research literature as shown in the bibliography. The report covers the developments up to January 2003, thus leaving out for example the possible effects of the recent war in Iraq. The author, Dr. Vyachaslau Paznyak, born in 1954, received his degree in 1988 after defending a dissertation on US foreign policy strategies in 1980–1985. He is Director of the International Institute for Policy Studies, a non-governmental think-tank in Minsk (see http://iips.virtualave.net/eng/publs.html.), and Associate Professor in political science at the European Humanities University in Minsk since 1997. Mr. Paznyak is also a well- known researcher, who has participated in numerous international projects and conferences, and has written many studies printed in the West. ([email protected]) This report is published by the FOI as support for a project on Russian foreign, defense and security policy (RUFS) and belongs to a series of reports about Russia and its neighbors (see back cover). FOI staff has adapted the report to its own publishing format and made the summaries above. Otherwise the author is responsible for the contents of the report. The fact that the FOI publishes the report in no way means an endorsement of opinions expressed in it. Jan Leijonhielm Manager Contents Introduction 3 1. Belarus and the European Union: An Overview 5 1.1 Current status, problems and prospects for the TACIS program in Belarus 7 2. Russia’s, Ukraine’s and Belarus’ Relations with the EU in A Comparative Perspective 9 2.1 The Russian Federation 9 2.2 Ukraine 12 2.3 Belarus 14 3. Belarus and Its Neighbors: Regional Issues and Regional Cooperation 17 3.1 Border issues 17 3.2 Migration issues 20 3.3 Regional cooperation on combating organized crime and terrorism 23 3.4 Energy/gas/oil transit and transportation issues 26 3.5 The Kaliningrad question: a non-pilot project for Belarus 28 4. Belarus and EU Enlargement: Challenges with Narrow Opportunities in Sight 31 5. Belarus and NATO: It Takes Two to Tango 35 5.1 An archaeology of history: no post-modernist delight 35 5.2 Cooperation under the Partnership for Peace program 42 5.3 Misperceptions and ambivalent strategies vs. the expansion of the “new division lines” 43 5.4 Belarus, NATO and Russia: an unhappy ‘triangle’ 47 Conclusions 53 Appendices 57 Appendix 1. Migration to and from Belarus 57 Appendix 2. EU declarations on Belarus 58 Appendix 3 Public attitudes in Belarus 60 Appendix 4 Estimates of external threats in Belarus media 62 Bibliography 67 Websites 74 2 3 Introduction The parallel enlargement of the European Union and NATO obviously plays a major role in the dramatic transformations that have swept Europe in the new millennium. It is aimed at meeting new challenges, but it is also a challenge in and of itself, not least for the countries which remain “outsiders” to this process, but which are becoming new direct neighbors of the enlarging entities. Belarus takes a special place amidst these kaleidoscopic events. It is the country in Central–Eastern Europe with the lowest-level relations and the highest-level tensions as regards both the EU and NATO, as well as some other European organizations for that matter. It may, therefore, find itself “out in the cold” and suffer rather than benefit from the ongoing expansion. By the same token, because of its important geopolitical position and its transit role for the European Union and Eurasia, Belarus is bound to exert a considerable influence over the climate of cooperation, and more specifically over the shaping of new border, trade and security regimes in the region and beyond. Therefore, from the perspective of the dual enlargement Belarus presents a dual issue: its particular problems are increasingly connected with and magnified by the expansion of the two most powerful European political, economic, and security institutions. While the developments at the new EU and NATO eastern borders are at a relatively early stage, it may be just the right
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Prospects for Democracy in Belarus
    An Eastern Slavic Brotherhood: The Determinative Factors Affecting Democratic Development in Ukraine and Belarus Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Nicholas Hendon Starvaggi, B.A. Graduate Program in Slavic and East European Studies The Ohio State University 2009 Thesis Committee: Trevor Brown, Advisor Goldie Shabad Copyright by Nicholas Hendon Starvaggi 2009 Abstract Following the collapse of the Soviet Union, fifteen successor states emerged as independent nations that began transitions toward democratic governance and a market economy. These efforts have met with various levels of success. Three of these countries have since experienced “color revolutions,” which have been characterized by initial public demonstrations against the old order and a subsequent revision of the rules of the political game. In 2004-2005, these “color revolutions” were greeted by many international observers with optimism for these countries‟ progress toward democracy. In hindsight, however, the term itself needs to be assessed for its accuracy, as the political developments that followed seemed to regress away from democratic goals. In one of these countries, Ukraine, the Orange Revolution has brought about renewed hope in democracy, yet important obstacles remain. Belarus, Ukraine‟s northern neighbor, shares many structural similarities yet has not experienced a “color revolution.” Anti- governmental demonstrations in Minsk in 2006 were met with brutal force that spoiled the opposition‟s hopes of reenacting a similar political outcome to that which Ukraine‟s Orange Coalition was able to achieve in 2004. Through a comparative analysis of these two countries, it is found that the significant factors that prevented a “color revolution” in Belarus are a cohesive national identity that aligns with an authoritarian value system, a lack of engagement with U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Kazakhstan Missile Chronology
    Kazakhstan Missile Chronology Last update: May 2010 As of May 2010, this chronology is no longer being updated. For current developments, please see the Kazakhstan Missile Overview. This annotated chronology is based on the data sources that follow each entry. Public sources often provide conflicting information on classified military programs. In some cases we are unable to resolve these discrepancies, in others we have deliberately refrained from doing so to highlight the potential influence of false or misleading information as it appeared over time. In many cases, we are unable to independently verify claims. Hence in reviewing this chronology, readers should take into account the credibility of the sources employed here. Inclusion in this chronology does not necessarily indicate that a particular development is of direct or indirect proliferation significance. Some entries provide international or domestic context for technological development and national policymaking. Moreover, some entries may refer to developments with positive consequences for nonproliferation. 2009-1947 March 2009 On 4 March 2009, Kazakhstan signed a contract to purchase S-300 air defense missile systems from Russia. According to Ministry of Defense officials, Kazakhstan plans to purchase 10 batteries of S-300PS by 2011. Kazakhstan's Air Defense Commander Aleksandr Sorokin mentioned, however, that the 10 batteries would still not be enough to shield all the most vital" facilities designated earlier by a presidential decree. The export version of S- 300PS (NATO designation SA-10C Grumble) has a maximum range of 75 km and can hit targets moving at up to 1200 m/s at a minimum altitude of 25 meters.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ukrainian Weekly 1993, No.23
    www.ukrweekly.com INSIDE: • Ukraine's search for security by Dr. Roman Solchanyk — page 2. • Chornobyl victim needs bone marrow transplant ~ page 4 • Teaching English in Ukraine program is under way - page 1 1 Publishfd by the Ukrainian National Association inc., a fraternal non-prof it association rainianWee Vol. LXI No. 23 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, JUNE 6, 1993 50 cents New York commemorates Tensions mount over Black Sea Fleet by Marta Kolomayets Sea Fleet until 1995. 60th anniversary of Famine Kyyiv Press Bureau More than half the fleet — 203 ships — has raised the ensign of St. Andrew, by Andrij Wynnyckyj inaccurate reports carried in the press," KYYIV — Ukrainian President the flag of the Russian Imperial Navy. ranging from those of New York Times Leonid Kravchuk has asked for a summit NEW YORK — On June 1, the New None of the fleet's Warships, however, reporter Walter Duranty written in the meeting with Russian leader Boris have raised the ensign. On Friday, May York area's Ukrainian Americans com­ 1930s, to recent Soviet denials and Yeltsin to try to resolve mounting ten­ memorated the 60th anniversary of the Western attempts to smear famine sions surrounding control of the Black (Continued on page 13) tragic Soviet-induced famine of І932- researchers. Sea Fleet. 1933 with a "Day of Remembrance," "Now the facts are on the table," Mr. In response, Russian Foreign Minister consisting of an afternoon symposium Oilman said. "The archives have been Andrei Kozyrev is scheduled to arrive in Parliament begins held at the Ukrainian Institute of opened in Moscow and in Kyyiv, and the Ukraine on Friday morning, June 4, to America, and an evening requiem for the Ukrainian Holocaust has been revealed arrange the meeting between the two debate on START victims held at St.
    [Show full text]
  • The EU and Belarus – a Relationship with Reservations Dr
    BELARUS AND THE EU: FROM ISOLATION TOWARDS COOPERATION EDITED BY DR. HANS-GEORG WIECK AND STEPHAN MALERIUS VILNIUS 2011 UDK 327(476+4) Be-131 BELARUS AND THE EU: FROM ISOLATION TOWARDS COOPERATION Authors: Dr. Hans-Georg Wieck, Dr. Vitali Silitski, Dr. Kai-Olaf Lang, Dr. Martin Koopmann, Andrei Yahorau, Dr. Svetlana Matskevich, Valeri Fadeev, Dr. Andrei Kazakevich, Dr. Mikhail Pastukhou, Leonid Kalitenya, Alexander Chubrik Editors: Dr. Hans-Georg Wieck, Stephan Malerius This is a joint publication of the Centre for European Studies and the Konrad- Adenauer-Stiftung. This publication has received funding from the European Parliament. Sole responsibility for facts or opinions expressed in this publication rests with the authors. The Centre for European Studies, the Konrad-Adenauer- Stiftung and the European Parliament assume no responsibility either for the information contained in the publication or its subsequent use. ISBN 978-609-95320-1-1 © 2011, Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V., Sankt Augustin / Berlin © Front cover photo: Jan Brykczynski CONTENTS 5 | Consultancy PROJECT: BELARUS AND THE EU Dr. Hans-Georg Wieck 13 | BELARUS IN AN INTERnational CONTEXT Dr. Vitali Silitski 22 | THE EU and BELARUS – A Relationship WITH RESERvations Dr. Kai-Olaf Lang, Dr. Martin Koopmann 34 | CIVIL SOCIETY: AN analysis OF THE situation AND diRECTIONS FOR REFORM Andrei Yahorau 53 | Education IN BELARUS: REFORM AND COOPERation WITH THE EU Dr. Svetlana Matskevich 70 | State bodies, CONSTITUTIONAL REALITY AND FORMS OF RULE Valeri Fadeev 79 | JudiciaRY AND law
    [Show full text]
  • HARVARD UKRAINIAN STUDIES EDITOR Lubomyr Hajda, Harvard University
    HARVARD UKRAINIAN STUDIES EDITOR Lubomyr Hajda, Harvard University EDITORIAL BOARD Michael S. Flier, George G. Grabowicz, Edward L. Keenan, and Roman Szporluk, Harvard University; Frank E. Sysyn, University of Alberta FOUNDING EDITORS Omeljan Pritsak and Ihor Sevcenko, Harvard University BOOK REVIEW EDITOR Larry Wolff EDITORIAL ASSISTANT Daría Yurchuk DIRECTOR OF PUBLICATIONS Robert A. DeLossa ADVISORY BOARD Zvi Ankori, Tel Aviv University—John A. Armstrong, University of Wisconsin—Yaroslav Bilinsky, University of Delaware—Bohdan R. Bociurkiw, Carleton University, Ottawa—Axinia Djurova, University of Sofia—Olexa Horbatsch, University of Frankfurt—Halil inalcık, University of Chi- cago—Jaroslav D. Isajevych, Institute of Ukrainian Studies, Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, L'viv— Edward Kasinec, New York Public Library—Magdalena László-Kujiuk, University of Bucharest— Walter Leitsch, University of Vienna—L. R. Lewitter, Cambridge University—G. Luciani, University of Bordeaux—George S. N. Luckyj, University of Toronto—M. Łesiów, Marie Curie-Sktodowska University, Lublin—Paul R. Magocsi, University of Toronto—Dimitri Obolensky, Oxford Univer- sity—RiccardoPicchio, Yale University—MarcRaeff, Columbia University—HansRothe, University of Bonn—Bohdan Rubchak, University of Illinois at Chicago Circle—Władysław A. Serczyk, University of Warsaw at Białystok—George Y. Shevelov, Columbia University—Günther Stökl, University of Cologne—A. de Vincenz, University of Göttingen—Vaclav Żidlicky, Charles Univer- sity, Prague. COMMITTEE ON UKRAINIAN STUDIES, Harvard University Stanisław Barańczak Patricia Chaput Timothy Colton Michael S. Flier George G. Grabowicz Edward L. Keenan Jeffrey D. Sachs Roman Szporluk (Chairman) Subscription rates per volume (two double issues) are $28.00 U.S. in the United States and Canada, $32.00 in other countries. The price of one double issue is $ 18.00 ($20.00 overseas).
    [Show full text]
  • POLL: HUMAN RIGHTS RANKED LOW in BELARUS More Belarusians Value the Right to Life and to Free Education Over Rights Such As Freedom of Speech and Free Elections
    POLL: HUMAN RIGHTS RANKED LOW IN BELARUS More Belarusians value the right to life and to free education over rights such as freedom of speech and free elections This memo presents key results of a public opinion poll on Belarusians’ perception of human rights, commissioned by Belarus Helsinki Committee (BHC) and implemented by SATIO. Pact provided technical expertise to BHC in drafting this memo because it believes that the Belarusian human rights sector would benefit from an evidence-based approach to addressing the priority needs of its constituency, while simultaneously creating demand for a wider range of human rights issues. “Recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice, and peace in the world.”1 This is the very first sentence of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which is ratified by all UN member countries, including Belarus. Respect for human rights depends on the willingness of the state to ensure respect for human rights on one hand, and willingness of the people to defend their rights on the other hand. However, in the countries believed to be “not free” according to international measures, for instance, Belarus,2 one cannot rely on political will to ensure human rights protection. In such countries, the readiness of people to stand up for their rights, and the knowledge of tools to protect human rights are critically important. From April to June, 2013, the BHC commissioned a nation-wide representative survey3 on human rights and human rights organizations in Belarus.
    [Show full text]
  • The Breach: Ukraine's Territorial Integrity and the Budapest Memorandum
    Issue Brief #3 Nuclear Proliferation International History Project The Breach: Ukraine’s Territorial Integrity and the Budapest Memorandum Mariana Budjeryn Russia’s annexation of Crimea and covert invasion of eastern Ukraine places an uncomfortable focus on the worth of the security assurances pledged to Ukraine by the nuclear powers in exchange for its denuclearization. In 1994, the three depository states of the Treaty on the Nonproliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT)—Russia, the United States, and the United Kingdom—extended positive and negative security assurances to Ukraine. The depository states underlined their commitment to Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity by signing the so-called “Budapest Memorandum.”1 Using new archival records, this examination of Ukraine’s search for security guarantees in the early 1990s reveals that, ironically, the threat of border revisionism by Russia was the single gravest concern of Ukraine’s leadership when surrendering the nuclear arsenal. The failure of the Budapest Memorandum to deter one of Ukraine’s security guarantors from military aggression has important implications both for Ukraine’s long-term security and for the value of security assurances for future international nonproliferation and disarmament efforts. Russia’s breach of the Memorandum invites strong scrutiny of other security commitments and opens an enormous rhetorical opportunity for proliferators to lobby for a nuclear deterrent. UKRAINE’S NUCLEAR PREDICAMENT In 1991, Ukraine inherited the world’s third largest more cautious approach to its nuclear inheritance, nuclear arsenal as a result of the collapse of the concerned that Russia’s monopoly on nuclear arms Soviet Union.2 By mid-1996, all nuclear munitions in the post-Soviet space would be conducive to its had been transferred from Ukraine to Russia resurgence as a dominating force in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Int Cat Css Blr 30785 E
    The Cost of Speaking Out Overview of human rights abuses committed by Belarusian authorities during peaceful protests in February-March 2017 © Truth Hounds Truth Hounds E [email protected] /facebook.com/truthhounds/ W truth-hounds.org IPHR - International Partnership for Human Rights Square de l'Aviation 7A 1070 Brussels, Belgium E [email protected] @IPHR W IPHRonline.org /facebook.com/iphronline CSP - Civic Solidarity Platform W civicsolidarity.org @CivicSolidarity /facebook.com/SivicSolidarity Crimea SOS E [email protected] /facebook.com/KRYM.SOS/ W krymsos.com Table of contents 1. Introduction and methodology 4 2. Chronological overview of events 5 2.1. February protests against the law on taxing the unemployed 5 2.2. March wave of administrative arrests of civil society activists and journalists 6 2.3. Increasing use of force by law enforcement officials 7 2.4. Criminal and administrative arrests prior to the 25 March Freedom Day protest in Minsk 9 2.5 Ill-treatment, excessive use of force and arbitrary detentions by police on 25 March - Freedom Day in Minsk 10 2.6 Raid of NGO HRC Viasna office and detention of 57 human rights defenders 14 2.7. Further arrests and reprisals by the authorities 14 2.8. Criminal cases related to allegations of attempted armed violence 16 3. Police use of force and arbitrary detentions during assemblies 17 3.1. International standards 17 3.2. Domestic legislation 18 3.2. Structure of the law enforcement services 19 3.4. Patterns of human rights abuses 19 4. Overview of concerns related to violations of freedom of assembly 20 4.1.
    [Show full text]
  • BELARUS Restrictions on the Political and Civil Rights of Citizens Following the 2010 Presidential Election
    BELARUS Restrictions on the Political and Civil Rights of Citizens Following the 2010 Presidential Election of person. Article 4: No one shall be held in slavery Article 1: All human beings are born free and equal or servitude; slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms. Article 5: No one shall be subjected to in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. Article 6: Everyone has the right to recognition spirit of brotherhood. Article 2: Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, everywhere as a person before the law. Article 7: All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimi- without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, nation to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination. Article 8: Everyone has the right to an effective rem- basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person edy by the competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty. by law. Article 9: No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, Article 3: Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security June 2011 564a Uladz Hrydzin © This report has been produced with the support of the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA).
    [Show full text]
  • Gundersen, Was Born in 1915, in Revesand, a Small Fishing Village on the Southeast Coast of Norway
    The Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs Oral History Department JON GUNDERSEN Interviewed by: Charles Stuart Kennedy Initial interview date: April 17, 2012 Copyright 2013 A ST TABLE OF CONTENTS Background Born and raised in New ork George Washington University% Stanford University% University of Oslo International School US Army, (ietnam )196,-1969. Comments on (ietnam War Work in Norway 0uantico, (irginia 1969-1911 Sky 2arshal 3rogram Operations Foreign Travel Entered the Foreign Service 1913 E6amination State Department7 8iaison Officer, Soviet E6change Group 1913 Soviet outh E6hibit Operations Accompanying Soviet tour groups Oslo, Norway7 Consular Officer 1913-1915 Ambassador Tom Byrne Ambassador William Anders Communist 3arty members (isas Relations with Soviets Relations Soviet submarines Sweden Germany Nansen Environment 1 8ocal staff 8abor movement Anti-US elements Economy State Department7 Watch Officer, Operations Center 1915-191, Jerry Bremer Operations Environment Stanford University7 Soviet studies/Arms Control 191,-1919 Studies Environment Hoover Institute 3rofessor Barton Bernstein Soviet Union future Soviet ethnic and nationality groups State Department7 Foreign Service Institute )FSI.% Russian 1919-19,0 language training 2oscow, Soviet Union7 3ress and 3ublications Officer 19,0-19,1 2urray Feshbach Narodnoe Khozyaistva (3eoples Almanac) Operations Surveillance and entrapment Environment Ethnicity Embassy reporting Dissidents Ambassador 2alcolm Toon Ambassador Jack 2atlock Ambassador Tom Watson
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Distr.: General 22 September 2017
    United Nations A/72/493 General Assembly Distr.: General 22 September 2017 Original: English Seventy-second session Agenda item 72 (c) Promotion and protection of human rights: human rights situations and reports of special rapporteurs and representatives Situation of human rights in Belarus* Note by the Secretary-General The Secretary-General has the honour to transmit to the General Assembly the report of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Belarus, Miklós Haraszti, submitted in accordance with Human Rights Council resolution 32/26. * The present report was submitted after the deadline to take into account information received by the Special Rapporteur during his trip to Minsk in July 2017. 17-16691 (E) 031017 *1716691* A/72/493 Report of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Belarus Summary The present report is submitted by the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Belarus in accordance with Human Rights Council resolution 32/26. The report examines the relationship between the unique features of governance of Belarus and its situation of human rights. It concludes that one of the main structural reasons for both the entrenched systemic abuse of human rights and the cyclical waves of mass repression in the country is that all powers are assumed by the executive branch, chiefly the President and the presidential administration. Although the Constitution provides for the separation of powers and respect for human rights, the reality is a monolithic power structure with laws and governance aimed at maintaining the concentration of powers and an absence of effective human rights guarantees.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ukrainian Weekly 1993
    lished by the Ufcrainian National Association Inc., a fraternal non-profit association j гаІИН V Vol. LXi mNo. 13 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, MARCH 28, 1993 50 cents Khasbulatov arrives in Kyyiv; Ukraine reacts to crisis in Russia by Marta Kolomayets "Events currently taking place in the visit's motives are questioned Kyyiv Press Bureau Russian Federation generate serious by Marta Kolomayets Other deputies who support demo­ uneasiness among the leadership of Kyyiv Press Bureau cratic reforms agreed that Mr. Khasbu- KYYIV — Despite destabilizing Ukraine. Analyzing this new turn in the latov's trip was politically propelled as events in Moscow over the weekend of poUtical battle taking place in Russia, KYYIV — The Friday, March 19, he monitored Ukraine's reaction to March 20-21, all remained quiet in U- we conclude that the conflicts between visit of Russian Parliament Chairman recent events in Moscow and weighed kraine, as the majority of democratical­ the various state powers should not halt Ruslan Khasbulatov to Kyyiv provoked the support he has among the deputies ly oriented parties and coalitions voiced the course of democratic reforms and the interests of numerous Ukrainian in the Ukrainian Parliament. their support for Russian President should not result in dramatic consequen­ Boris Yeltsin. parliamentarians who speculated as to Even Oleksander Moroz, the leader ces," the press release said. why this controversial figure had ar­ of the SociaUst Party of Ukraine, was In an official statement issued by his Mr. Kravchuk called for economic rived in Ukraine for an official visit just wary in offering his wholehearted cooperation between Ukraine and days after the conclusion of a volatile office on Sunday afternoon, March 21, support to Mr.
    [Show full text]