Congressional Record-House. M:Ay 31;~
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
.7456 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD-HOUSE. M:AY 31;~ Enrique H. Salazar,. of New Mexico, to be receiver of public Mr. POU rose. moneys at Fort Sumner, N. Mex. (Reappointment after change The SPEAKER. For what purpose does the t;entleman from from Territory to State.) North Carolina rise? REGISTERS OF THE LA.ND OFFICE. Mr. POU. I want to ask the gentleman from Virginia a question. Charles C. Henry, of New .Mexico, to be register of the land The SPr::.A.KER. Does the gentleman from Virginia yield? office at Fort Sumner, N. Mex., vice Arthur El Curren. (New Mr. HAY. Yes. appointment after change from Territory to State.) Mr. POU. I want to ask the gentleman if he is not willing Charles L. Hunt, of New_Mexico, to be register of the land that the rules be followed and that the claims bills be taken office at Clayton, N. Mex., vice Edward W. Fox. (New appoint up to-day? I will say in that connection that I have been tolcl ment after change from Territory to State.) twice that an arrangement had been made . by which the Com Royal A. Prentice, of New Mexico, to be register of the land mittee on Claims will be displaced. I do not .mow who has the office at 'l'ucumcari, N. Mex.. (Ileappointment after change from right to make such an arrangement; I certamly was not con Territory to State.) sulted, but I understand that an arrangement ha~ been per Manuel R. Otero, of New Mexico, to be register of the land fected whereby the Committee on Claims shall be. displaced office at Santa Fe, N. Mex. (Reappointment after change from to-day, and I rise to protest against it. · Territory to State.) Mr. HAY. I will say to the gentleman from North Carolina Thomas C. Tillotson, of New Mexico, to be register of the that I do not know of any arrangement by which the Committee land office at Roswell, N . .Mex. (Reappointment after change on Claims is to be displaced. Certainly I am not a party to any from Territory to State.) such arrangement. But I am compelled to call up this appro POSTMASTERS. priation bill because the desire of the House is, as I understand NEW MEXICO. it, to adjourn as soon as it possibly can, and it can not adjourn until these appropriation bills have been passed. I will state Vincent B. May to be postmaster at Las Cruces, N. Mex., in to the gentleman that this bill is a very short one and will take. place of Thomas Branigan. ·very little time, and that the gentleman will have the balance John Pfluger to e postmaster at Santa Fe, N. Mex., in place of the time. of Edward C. Burke. Mr. POU. Under the rules, the committee of which I am chairman has the entire <-lay, and I confess some surprise that CONFIRMATIONS. the gentleman could not select some other day on which to make E:cecittive nominations confirmed by the Senate May 81, 1912. his motion. PROMOTION IN THE REVENUE-CUTTER SERVICE. Mr. HAY. The gentleman must understand that under t]1e. rules my motion is a privileged motion. Cadet James Marsden Earp, to be third lieutenant. ' Mr. POU. I am perfectly aware of that, and it is simply a POSTMASTERS. question of preference with the gentleman as to whether he will· GEORGIA. make the motion this moruing or not. I am well aware of the Harry S. Edwards, Macon. fact that if he makes the motion that the House go into Com -wnliam T. Rudolph, Thomaston. mittee of the Whole House on the state of the Union it dis places the Committee on Claims, if the motion prevails. But I LOUISUNA. want to say to the House now that the House has had a com E. C. Crawford, Gretna. mittee very hard at work all of this session, and this is that NEW YORK. committee's day. Hereafter, as best I can, I shall oppose every William D. Smith, Northville. attempt to displace the Claims Committee on the days when its bills, under the rules, ought to have prefer~ce. PENNSYLVANIA. l\Ir. HAY. Mr. Speaker, I submit that this is not a debatable Jared H. Buckbee, Elkland. question. Harry L. Cooper, Edinboro. The SPEAKER. The Chair will state that this discussion Chauncey S. Ickes, Boswell. has been proceeding by unanimous consent. · · Wesley B. McAlpine, South Brownsville. Mr. PRINCE rose. John B. Moffitt, West Brownsville. The SPEAKER. For \Yhat purpose does the gentleman iise? TENNESSEE. Mr. PRINCE. I want to find out whether general debate will .W. A. Hill, McKenzie. be limited in Committee of the Whole. William B. Pickering, Carthage. The SPEAKER. That lms not been suggested yet. William J. Walker, Tiptonville. Mr. HAY. I ask unanimous consent, Mr. Speaker, that gen eral debate be confined to one hour, one half of the time to be controlled by the gentleman from Illinois [Mr. PRINCE] and one WITHDRAWAL. half by myself. Executive nomination withdrawn from the Senate May 81, 1912. The SPEAKER. Pending the motion to go into Committee POSTMASTER. of the Whole House on the state of the Union, the gentleml:!n ARKANSAS. from Virginia [Mr. HAY] asks unanimous consent that general. debate be limited to one hour, one half of the time to l>e con Mattie C. De Vaughan to be postmaster at Waldo. tro11ed by himself and the other half by the gentleman from Illinois [1\Ir. PRINCF.]. Is there objection? [After a pause.] The Chair hears none, and it is so ordered. The question is on HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. the motion of the gentleman from Virginia that the House re FRIDAY, May 31, 191~. solve itself into the Oommjttee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to consider the Military Academy appropriation The House met at 11 o'clock a. m. bill. 'l'he Chaplain, Rev. Henry N. Couden, D. D., offered the fol- The question was taken on the motion of Mr. HAY; and on a lowing prayer~ . division (demanded by Mr. Pou) there were-ayes 25, noes 16. God of the universe, Father of our souls, cleanse our hearts Accordingly the House resolved itself into the Committee of from guile, and make straight our paths, that we may walk the Whole House on the state of the Union for the considera worthy of the vocation wher:ewith we are called and fulfill our tion of the bill (H. R. 24450) making appropriations for the destiny, to-day, to-morrow, and always, in the spirit of the support of the Military Academy for the fiscal year ending iJ,ord Jesus Christ. Amen. June 30, 1913, and for other purposes, with Mr. HENSLEY in The Journal of the proceedings of Wednesday, May 29, 1912, the chair. was read and approved. Mr. HAY. Mr. Chairman, I ask unanimous consent to dis-. MILITARY ACADEMY .APPROPRIATION BILL. pense with the first reading of the bill. Mr. HAY. Mr. Speaker, I move that the House resolve itself The CHAIR.MA...~. The gentleman from Virginia [Mr. HAY] into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union asks unanimous consent to dispense with the first reading of for the consideration of the bill (H. R. 24450) making ap the bill. Is there objection? propriations for the support of the Military Academy for the There was no objection. fiscal year ending June 30, 1913, and for other purposes. Mr. HAY. Mr. Chairman, it i8 not necessary for me to go The SPEAKER. The gentleman from Virginia· [Mr. HAY] into any genel,"al discussion of the provL~ions of this bill. The. moves that the House resolve itself into Committee of the total estimates submitted by the department for the support of Whole House on the state of the Union for the purpose of the Military Academy aggregate ·$1,894,928.63. The amount ap <!onsidering the Military Academy appropriation bill. propriated for the last fiscal year was $1, 63,424.07. The .1912. CONGRESSIONAL RECORD-HOUSE . 7457 accompanying bill carries an appropriation of $1,034,059.26, did not pass until May 28. Why lay it on a coordinate branch? whkh is a reduction, of $129,3G4.83 over last year's bill and is May 28 the naval appropriation bill passed this House. Is it $8G0,869.37 below the estimates. fair to try to dodge the responsibility by putting it onto a co The bill carries no new items, and is purely and simply an ordinate branch of the Government? Let us tell the whole appropriation bill. truth and not half a truth. A half of the truth is worse than I reserve the balance of my time. the full statement. I think if my colleague had studied the l\lr. PRINCE. l\lr. Chairman, this is practically an appro calendar printed on to-day-May 31, 1912-he would have an priation bill. There may be a few items that, if one was in swered his own question, which I am glad he asked me. clined to be captious, might be criticized; but the days are l\lr. Speaker, in the days when my distinguished colleague lengthening; the time for this Congress to adjourn, or the time was Speaker of the House we did much business. We passed when it ought to adjourn, is getting near. [Applause.] the appropriation bills. We had our unanimous-consent legl.s From what I ha.ve seen here during my service in the House lation, and I believe that as much, if not more, general legis I am inclined to think that what is known as the Holman rule lation, more legislation for the benefit of the people in their has made this session of Congress at least six weeks longer respective districts was passed under the management and un than it ought to have been; and if legislation is put upon appro der the control of the distinguished gentleman from Illinois priation bills in the short session which is to follow in Decem [l\fr.