Electric Scooters and Bikes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

ELECTRIC SCOOTERS AND BIKES USES AND APPLICATIONS • Personal Units – purchased by individuals for transportation needs Can be purchased for as little as $50.00 or as much as $1000.00 for scooters and $500.00 to $3,500 for bikes • Company Owned – purchased by various companies and deployed in communities as vehicles for hire • Companies such as Uber, Lyft, Mobike, Ofo, Bcycle, LIME, etc. • Deployed in large metropolitan downtown areas • Industry has exploded in last 8-10 years • Only known Wyoming deployment is in Jackson REGULATION OPTIONS FOR DEVICE OPERATION Rules – Denver has rules that govern where rental devices may be used including: Speed limits (6 mph) on sidewalks Speed minimums on roadways (12 mph) Use of bike lanes if available Use of roadway according to bike ordinances (with traffic, stop at lights, etc) Ordinance – either including electric devices in existing bike ordinances or creating separate ordinance to govern ride usage REGULATION OF COMPANIES PROVIDING VEHICLES FOR HIRE • Some cities are either proactively regulating use in their jurisdiction or have been forced to retroactively regulate use. Under this model communities set rules for deployment (area of town, business model (docked v. undocked), limits on how many devices may be deployed, fee structures) as well as consideration to licensing on a yearly basis. • Licensing may provide revenue for enhancements in ride areas – expansion of rights of way to accommodate devices either in ride mode or store mode, limiting how many providers may exist in their jurisdiction • Licensing may incentivize or de-incentivize providers – may make it difficult for small start-ups to provide devices so that well-established providers may do business JURISDICTIONALLY OWNED DEVICES • Some Cities have invested public funds into establishing vehicle for hire programs • Driven by consideration of alternate transportation options • Attempts to reduce carbon footprint • Revenue enhancement UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING & LIME • LIME is in initial discussion with UW Athletics (Learfield Sports) about deploying scooters on campus • 1/80 student ratio for deployment (estimated 175 units) • Currently against UW regulations to ride motorized scooters on campus • UW representatives suggested that LIME talk with COL • 2 other vendors interested but only LIME has approached Learfield Sports.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

City of Del Mar Staff Report
City of Del Mar Staff Report TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members FROM: Clem Brown, Environmental Sustainability/Special Projects Manager Via Scott Huth, City Manager DATE: May 6, 2019 SUBJECT: License Agreement with Gotcha Ride LLC to Operate the North County Bike Share Pilot Program in the City of Del Mar REQUESTED ACTION/RECOMMENDATION: Staff requests that the City Council approve a license agreement with Gotcha Ride LLC (Attachment A) to operate the North County Coastal Bike Share Pilot Program in the City of Del Mar and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement. BACKGROUND: The City of Del Mar is committed to reducing local greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to limit the effects of climate change, while also offering viable transportation alternatives to driving. Del Mar has adopted a Climate Action Plan (CAP) that establishes a number of strategies to meet GHG emissions reduction targets, including facilitating safe, convenient, and affordable alternative transportation options. Specifically, Goal 14 in the CAP includes a strategy to “explore implementation of a bike share program…to provide another transportation alternative for traveling in town.” Transportation, especially travel via single occupancy vehicles, is a major source of GHG emissions in Del Mar and the other north San Diego County (North County) coastal cities. Offering and promoting programs like bike share, that replace vehicle trips with bike trips, is one way Del Mar can help to reduce emissions while offering more efficient and more affordable transportation modes for residents, employees, and visitors. Bike share is a service by which bicycles are made available for shared use to individuals on a very short-term basis, allowing them to borrow a bicycle at one location and return it either to the same or an alternate location within a defined geographic boundary.
[Show full text]
Olathe's Bike Share Implementation Strategy
CITY OF OLATHE + MARC Bike Share Implementation Strategy FEBRUARY 2018 Bike Share Implementation Strategy | 1 2 | City of Olathe Acknowledgements Project Partners Advisory Committee City of Olathe John Andrade – Parks & Recreation Foundation Mid America Regional Council Tim Brady – Olathe Schools Marvin Butler – Fire Captain/Inspector Emily Carrillo – Neighborhood Planning City Staff Coordinator Mike Fields – Community Center Manager Susan Sherman – Assistant City Manager Ashley Follett – Johnson County Department of Michael Meadors – Parks & Recreation Director Health and Enviroment Brad Clay – Deputy Director Parks & Recreation Megan Foreman – Johnson County Department Shawna Davis – Management Intern of Health and Enviroment Lisa Donnelly – Park Project Planner Bubba Goeddert – Olathe Chamber of Commerce Mike Latka – Park Project Coordinator Ben Hart – Parks & Recreation Foundation Linda Voss – Sr. Traffic Engineer Katie Lange – Interpreter Specialist Matt Lee – Mid-America Nazarene University Consultant Team Laurel Lucas – Customer Service, Housing Megan Merryman – Johnson County Parks & BikeWalkKC Recreation District Alta Planning + Design Liz Newman – Sr. Horticulturist Vireo Todd Olmstead – Facility & Housing Assistant Manager Sean Pendley – Sr. Planner Kathy Rankin – Housing Services Manager Bryan Severns – K-State Olathe Jon Spence – Mid-America Nazarene University Drew Stihl – Mid-America Regional Council Brenda Volle – Program Coordinator, Housing Rob Wyrick – Olathe Health Bike Share Implementation Strategy | 3 4 | City of Olathe Table of Contents I. BACKGROUND 11 II. ANALYSIS 15 III. SYSTEM PLANNING 45 IV. IMPLEMENTATION 77 Bike Share Implementation Strategy | 5 6 | City of Olathe Executive Summary Project Goals System Options • Identify how bike share can benefit Olathe. • Bike Library: Bike libraries usually involve a fleet of bicycles that are rented out at a limited • Identify the local demand for bike share in number of staffed kiosks.
[Show full text]
For FY2020 for the 2019 - 2024 TIP
Transportation Alternative Program (TAP) Projects Recommended for FY2020 for the 2019 - 2024 TIP Active Transportation Committee Meeting April 11, 2018 Process for New Projects & The Draft TIP SEPT / OCT NOV / DEC / JAN JUNE FEB / MAR APR / MAY Letters of Intent Project Draft TIP Project Reviews Draft Projects/ Evaluation and Evaluations Draft Programs Concept Reports JULY AUG SEPT OCT Public Comment Review and FHWA and FTA TIP / STIP Approve TIP Review / Approved Approve TIP 3 Plain City – 1975 North Widening – Construct Sidewalk Project Type – Safe Routes to School 3775 West to 3525 West Recommended Funding $ 300,000 Project Cost – $ 1,142,300 The proposed project is to add a shoulder and curb, gutter and Funds Request – sidewalk for pedestrian use and to provide a walking route to the $ 1,064,966 elementary school. Farmington City – State Street & Clark Lane – Pedestrian Crossings Project Type – Capital Improvement 400 West and 950 West Recommended Funding $ 200,000 Project Cost – Install 2 pedestrian signals in existing mid-block crosswalks. There's $ 318,100 There has been 1 pedestrian fatality at State Street and 400 W. Location two has seen a large increase in pedestrian and vehicle Funds Request – traffic near the Davis County Legacy Event Center. The project is $ 296,565 needed to increase safety for pedestrians at these crosswalks. Farmington City – East Park Lane Road – Construct Missing Sidewalk Project Type – Capital Improvement 326 West Park Lane Recommended Funding $ 71,041 Project Cost – The north side of SR 225 is fully improved from Main St. to Lagoon $ 76,200 Dr. except for a 100' gap which requires asphalt, curb & gutter, sidewalk, and additional ROW at 326 West Park Lane.
[Show full text]
2021 Virtual Conference Sponsorship Deck
2021 NABSA Virtual Conference Sponsorship Packages and Pricing The Future is Shared ABOUT THE CONFERENCE The NABSA Annual Conference is the only conference of its kind globally. The NABSA conference is an international cross- sector convening of all sectors involved in shared micromobility planning and implementation-- host cities, equipment manufacturers, operators, technology providers, consultants, data analytics companies, and other service providers that all contribute to realizing shared micromobility in communities. Sponsorship provides multiple venues and collateral items to connect you to the people you want to know, and who want to know you. Gain exposure to city officials, operators, and private industry professionals, and make your mark in the shared micromobility industry. The Future is Shared ABOUT THE CONFERENCE The NABSA conference is a global stage. The NABSA Conference is the longest-running and only conference of it’s kind globally. Professionals from all over the world attend this must-go event! The 2020 NABSA virtual conference had 400 attendees. The 2018 & 2019 in-person NABSA conferences had between 300-350 bikeshare and shared mobility professionals in attendance - government officials, private industry and non-profit professionals. NABSA’s annual conference is the best way to connect with the leaders, influencers and decision-makers that are driving shared micromobility forward. Attendees include representatives from many cities across North America engaged in shared micromobility, and looking to implement and
[Show full text]
Strategies for Engaging Community
Strategies for Engaging Community Developing Better Relationships Through Bike Share photo Capital Bikeshare - Washington DC Capital Bikeshare - Washinton, DC The Better Bike Share Partnership is a collaboration funded by The JPB Foundation to build equitable and replicable bike share systems. The partners include The City of Philadelphia, Bicycle Coalition of Greater Philadelphia, the National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO) and the PeopleForBikes Foundation. In this guide: Introduction........................................................... 5 At a Glance............................................................. 6 Goal 1: Increase Access to Mobility...................................................... 9 Goal 2: Get More People Biking................................................ 27 Goal 3: Increase Awareness and Support for Bike Share..................................................... 43 3 Healthy Ride - Pittsburgh, PA The core promise of bike share is increased mobility and freedom, helping people to get more easily to the places they want to go. To meet this promise, and to make sure that bike share’s benefits are equitably offered to people of all incomes, races, and demographics, public engagement must be at the fore of bike share advocacy, planning, implementation, and operations. Cities, advocates, community groups, and operators must work together to engage with their communities—repeatedly, strategically, honestly, and openly—to ensure that bike share provides a reliable, accessible mobility option
[Show full text]
Examining and Optimizing the Bcycle Bike-Sharing System
Applied Energy 247 (2019) 1–12 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Applied Energy journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/apenergy Examining and optimizing the BCycle bike-sharing system – A pilot study in T Colorado, US ⁎ Yujie Hua, Yongping Zhangb, David Lambc, Mingming Zhangd, Peng Jiae,f, a School of Geosciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620, USA b The Bartlett Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK c Center for Urban Transportation Research, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620, USA d Kinder Institute for Urban Research, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA e Department of Earth Observation Science, Faculty of Geo-information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), University of Twente, Enschede, 7500, Netherlands f International Initiative on Spatial Lifecourse Epidemiology (ISLE) HIGHLIGHTS • A case study based on the national BCycle bike-sharing program was presented. • The bike usage patterns were compared among different membership groups. • The spatio-temporal trends of empty and full bike stations were examined. • The current system configuration was optimized under three hypothetical scenarios. • This study has important implications to other cities in the BCycle program. ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Many cities around the world have integrated bike-sharing programs into their public transit systems to promise Bike-sharing sustainable, affordable transportation and reduce environmental pollution in urban areas. Investigating the Bike usage usage
[Show full text]
Exploring Bicycle Options for Federal Lands: Bike Sharing, Rentals and Employee Fleets
FHWA-WFL/TD-12-001 JANUARY 2012 EXPLORING BICYCLE OPTIONS FOR FEDERAL LANDS: BIKE SHARING, RENTALS AND EMPLOYEE FLEETS Technical Report published by Technology Deployment Program Western Federal Lands Highway Division Federal Highway Administration 610 East 5th St. Vancouver, WA 98661 For more information or additional copies contact: Susan Law, Planning Team Leader [email protected], 360.619.7840 Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA-WFL/TD-12-001 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date January 2012 EXPLORING BICYCLE OPTIONS FOR FEDERAL LANDS: BIKE SHARING, RENTALS AND EMPLOYEE FLEETS 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Rebecca Gleason, Laurie Miskimins 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Western Transportation Institute P.O. Box 174250 11. Contract or Grant No. Bozeman, MT 59717-4250 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Federal Highway Administration Final Report Western Federal Lands Highway Division August 2009 – July 2011 610 East 5th St. Vancouver, WA 98661 14. Sponsoring Agency Code HFL-17 15. Supplementary Notes COTR: Susan Law – FHWA CFLHD/WFLHD. Advisory Panel Members: Adam Schildge – FTA, Alan Turnbull – NPS RTCA, Andrew Duvall, National Science Foundation IGERT PhD student, Brandon Jutz – FWS, Candace Rutt – CDC, Diana Allen – NPS RTCA, Franz Gimmler – non-motorized consultant, Ivan Levin – Outdoor Foundation, Jane D. Wargo – HHS, Jason Martz – NPS, Jim Evans – NPS, Nathan Caldwell – FWS, Paul DeMaio – Bike Share consultant, Tokey Boswell – NPS. This project was funded by the Fish and Wildlife Service Refuge Road Program.
[Show full text]
Measuring the Sustainability of U.S. Public Bicycle Systems
University of New Orleans ScholarWorks@UNO University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations Dissertations and Theses Fall 12-15-2012 Measuring the Sustainability of U.S. Public Bicycle Systems Max W. Williamson University of New Orleans, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uno.edu/td Part of the Urban, Community and Regional Planning Commons Recommended Citation Williamson, Max W., "Measuring the Sustainability of U.S. Public Bicycle Systems" (2012). University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations. 1574. https://scholarworks.uno.edu/td/1574 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by ScholarWorks@UNO with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights- holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Measuring the Sustainability of U.S. Public Bicycle Systems A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of New Orleans in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Urban and Regional Planning by Max Whitman Williamson B.S. Florida State
[Show full text]
Annual Report
2 017 Annual Report Owner & Operator Of: Mission & Vision ...............................2 Board Chair’s Letter ..........................3 2017 Board of Directors ...................4 Executive Director’s Letter ................5 Denver B-cycle is presented by: Looking Back At 2017 ......................6 2017 Successes ...............................6 2017 Financial Summary ..................7 System Data .....................................8 Abbreviated Financial Statements ....9 Partners & Contributors ..................10 Let’s Go Ride Bikes Denver Bike Sharing is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization that OUR VISION owns and operates an automated, public bike sharing system Denver B-cycle will: known as Denver B-cycle. In 2017, the system included 737 • Complement and integrate with Denver’s bicycles and 89 stations located throughout downtown Denver, comprehensive metropolitan transportation Capitol Hill, Uptown, Highlands, Globeville, Cherry Creek and Baker system neighborhoods and on the Auraria campus. • Encourage the replacement of short car trips for recreational, social and functional OUR MISSION purposes Denver B-cycle is presented by Kaiser Permanente in association • Serve a broad spectrum of transportation with a variety of community sponsors. Denver B-cycle is owned users and needs and operated by Denver Bike Sharing, a charitable, non-profit Contribute to Denver becoming the healthiest organization. • and greenest city in America Denver Bike Sharing serves as a catalyst for a fundamental • Advance the perception of cycling as a transformation in thinking and behavior by operating a bike sharing utilitarian mode of transportation. system in Denver to enhance mobility while promoting all aspects of sustainability: quality of life, equity, the environment, economic • Solidify B-cycle as a modality option in Denver’s transportation landscape. development, and public health.
[Show full text]
Bike Sharing in the United States: State of the Practice and Guide to Implementation Bike Sharing in the United States
DOWNTOWN BOISE Parking Strategic Plan APPENDIX A2 Bike Sharing in the United States: State of the Practice and Guide to Implementation Bike Sharing in the United States: State of the Practice and Guide to Implementation September 2012 Prepared by Toole Design Group and the Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center for USDOT Federal Highway Administration Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center CREDIT: CAPITAL BIKESHARE (WASHINGTON, DC) CREDIT: BOULDER B-CYCLE (BOULDER, CO) CREDIT: DECO BIKE (MIAMI BEACH, FL) NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Federal Highway Administration in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the use of the information contained in this document. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. The U.S. Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trademarks or manufacturers’ names appear in this report only because they are considered essential to the objective of the document. The opinions, findings and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Federal Highway Administration. This document can be downloaded from the following website: www.bicyclinginfo.org/bikeshare September 2012. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This Guide was prepared by Toole Design Group and the Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center through a cooperative agreement (DTFH61-11H-00024) with the Federal Highway Administration. This report would not have been possible without the support and assistance of the Advisory Committee, who were willing to share data, background information, and advice for future bike share programs. Also, special thanks to the League of American Bicyclists which distributed a bike share questionnaire to Bicycle Friendly Communities (results are reported in this report).
[Show full text]
Bike Share Feasibility Study La Crosse, Wisconsin
Bike Share Feasibility Study La Crosse, Wisconsin Zabrowski, Jack | Christen, Matthew | Buck, Jason | Miller, Jill Acknowledgements Bike-ability Field survey: Pioneering Healthy Communities Atticus Jaramillo Move More Committee: Carolyn Dvorak Brenda Maxwell Chuck Lee Brenda Rooney Erica Black Carolyn Dvorak Jacob Sciammas Dennis Rodenberg Lewis Kuhlman Erica Black Linda Lee Joyce Mlsna Matthew Christen Linda Larson Tim Acklin Matthew Christen Rebecca Lakowske Literature Review: Susan Lundsten Carolyn Dvorak Virginia Loehr Dennis Rodenberg Erica Black Heat Map creation and GIS analysis: Jill Miller Jason Buck City of La Crosse Lewis Kuhlman Matthew Christen Bicycle and Pedestrian Crash Map: T.Y. Lin International Financial Contributors: City of La Crosse City of La Crosse Planning Department: Gundersen Health System Amy Peterson La Crosse Area Planning Commission Jacob Larow Logistics Health Incorporated Larry Kirch Three Sixty Real Estate Solutions Lewis Kuhlman Mayo Clinic Health System-La Crosse Nathan Patros YMCA of La Crosse Tim Acklin 1 Bike Share Feasibility Study Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................3 Introduction......................................................................................................................................4 Methods ..........................................................................................................................................5 Results ............................................................................................................................................8
[Show full text]
Public Bikesharing in North America: Early Operator and User and Understanding Operator Early Public America: Bikesharing in North
MTI Public Bikesharing in North in Bikesharing America:Public Early Operator andUnderstanding User Funded by U.S. Department of Transportation and California Public Bikesharing in North Department of Transportation America: Early Operator and User Understanding MTI ReportMTI 11-26 MTI Report 11-26 June 2012 MINETA TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE MTI FOUNDER Hon. Norman Y. Mineta The Norman Y. Mineta International Institute for Surface Transportation Policy Studies was established by Congress in the MTI BOARD OF TRUSTEES Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA). The Institute’s Board of Trustees revised the name to Mineta Transportation Institute (MTI) in 1996. Reauthorized in 1998, MTI was selected by the U.S. Department of Transportation Honorary Chairman Joseph Boardman (Ex-Officio) John Horsley Michael S. Townes (TE 2011) through a competitive process in 2002 as a national “Center of Excellence.” The Institute is funded by Congress through the John L. Mica (Ex-Officio) Chief Executive Officer (Ex-Officio)* President/CEO (ret.) Amtrak Transportation District Commision of United States Department of Transportation’s Research and Innovative Technology Administration, the California Legislature Chair Executive Director House Transportation and American Association of State Hampton Roads through the Department of Transportation (Caltrans), and by private grants and donations. Infrastructure Committee Donald H. Camph (TE 2012) Highway and Transportation Officials House of Representatives President (AASHTO) David L. Turney* (TE 2012) California Institute for Technology Chairman, President & CEO The Institute receives oversight from an internationally respected Board of Trustees whose members represent all major surface Honorary Co-Chair, Honorable Exchange Will Kempton (TE 2012) Digital Recorders, Inc. transportation modes.
[Show full text]