DOCSLIB.ORG

JPR 18-02-28 RCA Findings

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
JPR 18-02-28 RCA Findings March 23, 2021 Nino Abad City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula, California 92590 Dear Mr. Abad: Please find the following JPR attached: JPR 18-08-30-01. The Local Identifier is Pala Community Park Sheet Pile Wall Construction Project. The JPR file attached includes the following: • RCA JPR Findings • Exhibit A, Regional • Exhibit B, Vicinity Map with MSHCP Schematic Cores and Linkages • Exhibit C, Vegetation • Exhibit D, Soil • Exhibit E, Conservation and Avoidance Areas Thank you, __________________________ Tricia Campbell Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority cc: Karin Cleary-Rose Heather Pert U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service California Dept. of Fish and Wildlife 777 East Tahquitz Canyon Way, 3602 Inland Empire Blvd. #C220 Suite 208 Ontario, California 91764 Palm Springs, California 92262 RCA Joint Project Review (JPR) JPR #: 18-08-30-01 Date: 03/23/2021 Project Information Permittee: City of Temecula Case Information: Pala Community Park Sheet Pile Wall Construction Project Site Acreage: 0.62 acre Portion of Site Proposed for MSHCP Conservation Area: 0 acres Criteria Consistency Review Consistency Conclusion: The project is consistent with both the Criteria and Other Plan requirements with implementation of the measures presented in these Findings (including any measures within the project information provided to the RCA by the Permittee for this JPR). Applicable Core/Linkage: Proposed Constrained Linkage 14 Area Plan: Southwest APN Sub-Unit Cell Group Cell 961-450-001 SU-1 Murrieta Creek Not in a Cell Group 7445 951-450-002 7446 Project Information a. Project information provided by the Permittee included a JPR Application (revised March 15, 2021), City of Temecula Cover letter (revised March 3, 2021) both prepared by the City of Temecula, and Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Consistency – Pala Community Park Sheet Pile Wall Construction1 (Analysis), (revised February 9, 2021), collectively prepared by City of Temecula, CWE Corporation, and Psomas. b. Project Location: The project is located in the City of Temecula at the north end of Pala Park. Surrounding land uses consist of residential development to the south and Temecula Creek to the north. c. Project Description: The project proposes installation of a sheet pile wall, approximately 427 feet in length, and an associated anchor system along the northern boundary of the existing soccer field in Pala Park. An impact pile driver will be used to install the sheet pile wall. The sheet pile wall will be driven to a maximum depth of 35 feet below ground surface. Wall anchors will be placed subsurface to hold the sheet pile wall in place in the event that Temecula Creek erodes further and potentially all the way to the sheet pile wall. Any excess materials will be hauled off the site. The sheet piles will be driven into the 1 City of Temecula, CWE Corporation, and Psomas. 2020. Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Consistency – Pala Community Park Sheet Pile Wall Construction (February 9, 2021) prepared by City of Temecula, CWE Corporation, and Psomas. 1 RCA Joint Project Review (JPR) JPR #: 18-08-30-01 Date: 03/23/2021 ground causing vibration. Based on the subsurface conditions, the upper 20 feet of soil is loose to medium dense and below 20 feet, soil material becomes denser. Dense soils facilitate greater vibration. However, given that these denser soils are at deeper depths, vibration towards ground surface diminishes and vibration level is anticipated to be below the threshold that would cause damage to the surrounding area. Given the distance to the bank, 6-foot height of the bank, and depth to dense soils, the City has stated that significant vibration towards the bank is not anticipated. The proposed project limits of work cover 0.62 acre and include an approximately 0.35-acre area where equipment would be staged, 0.01 acre for the sheet pile, another 0.16 acre of staging area, and 0.10 acre for the access route from the staging area. Soils on site consist of Grangeville fine sandy loam, Hanford course sandy loam, Riverwash, and Tujunga loamy sand. On-site vegetation communities consist of ruderal, ornamental, and disturbed habitat. Relation to Reserve Assembly a. As stated in Section 3.2.3 of the MSHCP, “Proposed Constrained Linkage 14 consists of portions of Pechanga and Temecula Creeks, located in the southwestern region of the Plan Area. This Constrained Linkage connects Existing Core G (Santa Margarita Ecological Reserve) and Proposed Linkage 10 in the west to Existing Linkage A in the south. This Linkage bifurcates and may be used to move directly to the east, along Temecula Creek, or to the southeast, along Pechanga Creek to Existing Linkage A. This Linkage is constrained along most of its length by existing urban Development and the planned land uses surrounding the Linkage consist almost entirely of city (Temecula). I-15 also intersects the Linkage at its western terminus. Therefore, high quality Live-In riparian Habitat must be maintained, and movement Habitat for bobcat and mountain lion must be provided, as these species are known to use the Linkage for movement. This portion of Pechanga and Temecula Creek may serve as one component of a larger movement corridor for mountain lions traveling between the Santa Ana Mountains and the Palomar Mountains. A Linkage between these two mountain ranges would reduce the risk of extirpation of the Santa Ana Mountains population of mountain lion, which was considered to be “demographically unstable” without a movement connection (Beier 1993). Maintenance of contiguous Habitat with appropriate refugia for resting, such as rockpiles, brush piles, windfalls, hollow snags, and hollow trees, is important for dispersal of juveniles. Maintenance of existing floodplain processes and water quality along the creek is also important for wetland species noted in the table below.” (refer to MSHCP Table XXXX) b. A portion of the project site is located within Cell 7445, independent of a Cell Group. Conservation within this Cell will contribute to assembly of Proposed Constrained Linkage 14. Conservation within this Cell will focus on riparian scrub, woodland, forest and grassland habitat along Temecula Creek. Areas conserved within this Cell will be connected to riparian scrub, woodland and forest habitat proposed for conservation in Cell 7444 to the west and 7446 to the east, and to riparian scrub, woodland, forest, and grassland habitat proposed for conservation in Cell 7358 to the north. Conservation within this Cell will range from 10%-20% of the Cell focusing in the northern portion of the Cell. 2 RCA Joint Project Review (JPR) JPR #: 18-08-30-01 Date: 03/23/2021 A portion of the project site is also located within Cell 7446, independent of a Cell Group. Conservation within this Cell will contribute to assembly of Proposed Constrained Linkage 14. Conservation within this Cell will focus on riparian scrub, woodland, forest and grassland habitat along Temecula Creek. Areas conserved within this Cell will be connected to riparian scrub, woodland, forest, and grassland habitat proposed for conservation in Cell 7359 to the north and in Cell 7445 to the west. Conservation within this Cell will range from 10%-20% of the Cell focusing in the northern portion of the Cell. c. Rough Step: The proposed project is located within Rough Step Unit 5. According the MSHCP 2019 Annual report, Rough Step Unit 5 encompasses 91,734 acres within the southwestern corner of western Riverside County and includes the Santa Rosa Plateau, the Tenaja Corridor, and Murrieta Creek (see Figure 3-6, Rough Step Unit 5). This Unit is bound by Interstate 15 to the east, San Diego County to the south, and the Santa Ana Mountains in the Cleveland National Forest to the west and north. Within Rough Step Unit 5, there are 24,326 acres within the Criteria Area. Key vegetation communities within Rough Step Unit 5 include: coastal sage scrub; grasslands; riparian scrub, woodland, forest; Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub; and woodlands and forests. Rough Step acreage goals are provided for each of these habitat types. Table 3-11, Rough Step Unit 5 Acreage Totals, also includes acres conserved for habitats for which Rough Step acreage goals do not exist. A total of 1,443 acres of conservation has been acquired within this Rough Step Unit. Losses to this unit total 2,172 acres, with remaining development allowance as followed: 185 acres of coastal sage scrub, 114 acres of grasslands, 8 acres of Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub, and 198 acres of woodlands and forests. The riparian scrub, woodland, forest vegetation category is out of Rough Step balance by 1 acre. The RCA is actively engaged in acquiring parcels that would bring riparian scrub, woodland, forest back into Rough Step for Unit 5. The total acreage needed is 5.7 acres of riparian scrub, woodland, forest. The proposed project will impact 0.6 acre of grassland, not riparian scrub, woodland, forest vegetation. Therefore, the project does not conflict with Rough Step. ROUGH STEP MEASURE. In accordance with Section 6.7 in Volume I of the Plan, it is the Permittees responsibility that if the rough step rule is not met during any analysis period (performed annually by the RCA), the Permittees must conserve appropriate lands supporting a specified vegetation community within the analysis unit to bring the Plan back into the parameters of the rule prior to authorizing additional loss of the vegetation community for which the rule was not achieved. The Permittee must not cause additional loss of any rough step vegetation that is out of balance. Prior to vegetation removal, the City of Temecula will confirm with the RCA that the project will not impact out-of-balance Rough Step vegetation in the applicable rough step unit.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • California Fire Siege 2007 an Overview Cover Photos from Top Clockwise: the Santiago Fire Threatens a Development on October 23, 2007
    CALIFORNIA FIRE SIEGE 2007 AN OVERVIEW Cover photos from top clockwise: The Santiago Fire threatens a development on October 23, 2007. (Photo credit: Scott Vickers, istockphoto) Image of Harris Fire taken from Ikhana unmanned aircraft on October 24, 2007. (Photo credit: NASA/U.S. Forest Service) A firefighter tries in vain to cool the flames of a wind-whipped blaze. (Photo credit: Dan Elliot) The American Red Cross acted quickly to establish evacuation centers during the siege. (Photo credit: American Red Cross) Opposite Page: Painting of Harris Fire by Kate Dore, based on photo by Wes Schultz. 2 Introductory Statement In October of 2007, a series of large wildfires ignited and burned hundreds of thousands of acres in Southern California. The fires displaced nearly one million residents, destroyed thousands of homes, and sadly took the lives of 10 people. Shortly after the fire siege began, a team was commissioned by CAL FIRE, the U.S. Forest Service and OES to gather data and measure the response from the numerous fire agencies involved. This report is the result of the team’s efforts and is based upon the best available information and all known facts that have been accumulated. In addition to outlining the fire conditions leading up to the 2007 siege, this report presents statistics —including availability of firefighting resources, acreage engaged, and weather conditions—alongside the strategies that were employed by fire commanders to create a complete day-by-day account of the firefighting effort. The ability to protect the lives, property, and natural resources of the residents of California is contingent upon the strength of cooperation and coordination among federal, state and local firefighting agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Margarita River Watershed Annual Watermaster Report for the 2013-14 Water Year
    SANTA MARGARITA RIVER WATERSHED ANNUAL WATERMASTER REPORT WATER YEAR 2013-14 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. FALLBROOK PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT, ET AL. CIVIL NO. 51-CV-1247-GPC-RBB CHARLES W. BINDER WATERMASTER P. 0. BOX 631 FALLBROOK, CA 92088 (760) 728-1028 FAX (760) 728-1990 August 2015 WATERMASTER SANTA MARGARITA RIVER WATERSHED TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. SECTION 1 - SUMMARY ............................................................................................... 1 SECTION 2 - INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................... 5 2.1 Background ......................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Authority .............................................................................................................. 5 2.3 Scope .................................................................................................................. 5 SECTION 3 - SURFACE WATER AVAILABILITY AND USE ......................................... 7 3.1 Surface Flow ........................................................................................................ 7 3.2 Surface Water Diversions .................................................................................. 13 3.3 Water Storage ................................................................................................... 13 SECTION 4- SUBSURFACE WATER AVAILABILITY ................................................. 19 4.1 General .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 4 Tribal Nations of San Diego County This Chapter Presents an Overall Summary of the Tribal Nations of San Diego County and the Water Resources on Their Reservations
    4 Tribal Nations of San Diego County This chapter presents an overall summary of the Tribal Nations of San Diego County and the water resources on their reservations. A brief description of each Tribe, along with a summary of available information on each Tribe’s water resources, is provided. The water management issues provided by the Tribe’s representatives at the San Diego IRWM outreach meetings are also presented. 4.1 Reservations San Diego County features the largest number of Tribes and Reservations of any county in the United States. There are 18 federally-recognized Tribal Nation Reservations and 17 Tribal Governments, because the Barona and Viejas Bands share joint-trust and administrative responsibility for the Capitan Grande Reservation. All of the Tribes within the San Diego IRWM Region are also recognized as California Native American Tribes. These Reservation lands, which are governed by Tribal Nations, total approximately 127,000 acres or 198 square miles. The locations of the Tribal Reservations are presented in Figure 4-1 and summarized in Table 4-1. Two additional Tribal Governments do not have federally recognized lands: 1) the San Luis Rey Band of Luiseño Indians (though the Band remains active in the San Diego region) and 2) the Mount Laguna Band of Luiseño Indians. Note that there may appear to be inconsistencies related to population sizes of tribes in Table 4-1. This is because not all Tribes may choose to participate in population surveys, or may identify with multiple heritages. 4.2 Cultural Groups Native Americans within the San Diego IRWM Region generally comprise four distinct cultural groups (Kumeyaay/Diegueno, Luiseño, Cahuilla, and Cupeño), which are from two distinct language families (Uto-Aztecan and Yuman-Cochimi).
    [Show full text]
  • 1 SETTLEMENT and RELEASE AGREEMENT This Settlement And
    SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT This Settlement and Release Agreement (“Agreement”) is entered into on October ___,26 2020 (the “Effective Date”), by and between the City of Temecula and City of Temecula City Council (the “City”); Ambient Communities, LLC and Temecula West Village, LLC (together referred to as “TWV”); Center for Biological Diversity, Sierra Club, Mountain Lion Foundation, and The Cougar Connection (collectively referred to as “CBD”); and Endangered Habitats League (“EHL”) (all referred to collectively as the “Parties” and, individually, a “Party”). RECITALS This Agreement is made with reference to, and in consideration of, the following facts and representations, which the Parties agree are true and correct: A. On December 12, 2017, the City Council of the City certified a final Environmental Impact Report (“EIR”) and approved other project entitlements (the “Approvals”) for the Altair Specific Plan (the “Project”). A map depicting the Project as approved is attached for reference purposes as Exhibit A. B. On January 11, 2018, CBD filed a Petition for Writ of Mandate and Complaint for Injunctive Relief alleging that Respondent City violated the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) and California planning and zoning laws in approving the EIR and the Approvals for the Project (the “CBD Petition”) in the action styled Center for Biological Diversity, et al. v. City of Temecula, et al. (Riverside County Superior Court Case No. RIC1800858) (the “CBD Action”). On January 10, 2019, CBD filed a First Amended and Supplemental Verified Petition for Writ of Mandate and Complaint for Injunctive Relief (the “Amended CBD Petition”), which added a claim alleging that the City had violated its duty to retain certain records.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Santa Margarita River Watershed Water Quality Workplan
    Upper Santa Margarita River Watershed Water Quality Workplan UPPER SANTA MARGARITA RIVER WATERSHED WATER QUALITY WORKPLAN for the Santa Margarita Region of Riverside County Revised: October 2015 i Upper Santa Margarita River Watershed Water Quality Workplan UPPER SANTA MARGARITA RIVER WATERSHED WATER QUALITY WORKPLAN FOR THE SANTA MARGARITA REGION OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY In compliance with Order No. R9‐2010‐0016, this Upper Santa Margarita River Watershed Water Quality Workplan has been developed and is currently being implemented by the Co‐Permittees in the Santa Margarita Region: Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District http://www.rcflood.org County of Riverside http://www.countyofriverside.us/ City of Murrieta http://www.murrieta.org/ City of Temecula http://www.cityoftemecula.org/ City of Wildomar http://www.cityofwildomar.org/ ii Upper Santa Margarita River Watershed Water Quality Workplan Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION TO THE UPPER SANTA MARGARITA RIVER WATERSHED WATER QUALITY WORKPLAN ....... 1 1.1 Purpose of the Watershed Water Quality Workplan for the Upper Santa Margarita River......... 1 1.2 Watershed Workplan Development ............................................................................................. 1 1.2.1 Public Participation .............................................................................................................................. 2 1.3 Governance and Public Participation ............................................................................................ 2 1.4
    [Show full text]
  • CITY of TEMECULA LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN ANNEX (To the Riverside County Operational Area Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan)
    2017 CITY OF TEMECULA LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN ANNEX (to the Riverside County Operational Area Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan) Prepared by: Roberto Cardenas, Fiscal Services Manager 6/1/2017 CONTACT INFORMATION CITY OF TEMECULA Name: Roberto Cardenas Title: Fiscal Services Manager Address: 41000 Main St. City, State and Zip: Temecula, CA 92590 Direct Contact: Roberto Cardenas Phone 951-693-3944 Fax: 951-302-4159 Email: [email protected] 1 PLAN ADOPTION/RESOLUTION The City of Temecula (City) will submit the City of Temecula Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Annex (LHMP Annex) to the Riverside County Emergency Management Department (EMD) for review and approval. EMD will, in turn, forward the LHMP Annex to the California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES) for review and approval. Cal OES will, in turn, submit the LHMP Annex to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for review and approval. The City will wait to receive an “Approval Pending Adoption” letter from FEMA before taking the plan to the City’s local governing body Temecula City Council for adoption. Upon approval, the City will insert the signed resolution into the LHMP Annex. 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Disaster Mitigation and Cost Recovery Act of 2000 (DMA 2000) amended the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act by placing a new emphasis on hazard mitigation planning, primarily moving from post-disaster mitigation to pre-disaster mitigation. As part of DMA 2000, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is now responsible for coordinating the implementation of the act requiring local government, state, and special jurisdictions to develop and maintain hazard mitigation plans.
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Margarita River Wma Monitoring Station Descriptions
    APPENDIX C Santa Margarita River WMA TMAR – FINAL January 2019 APPENDIX C – SANTA MARGARITA RIVER WMA MONITORING STATION DESCRIPTIONS Santa Margarita River WMA Transitional January 2019 Monitoring and Assessment Report - Final APPENDIX C Station Name: Temecula Creek below Pala Road (Lower Temecula Creek) Hydstra1 Reference #: 902LTC777 Location: Latitude 33° 28 '28.14" N Longitude 117° 8' 19.84" W Elevation 1,008 feet Thomas Bros Pg 979B3 Classification: Receiving Water - Mass Loading Station & Stream Assessment Type of Channel: Natural River Receiving Water: Santa Margarita River Directions to the site: Drive south on the I-215 freeway and exit at SR 79 South/Old Town Front Street. Go west of the freeway and turn left at the first stoplight. Turn left about 100 feet past the stop light onto a gravel/dirt road. Turn right, before the yellow EMWD gate. Drive to the dirt road that goes left and up. Go about 100 feet and turn right onto the dirt road. Go about 1,700 feet and drive to where the dirt road meets up with the gravel road. Follow the gravel road to the L3437 Pala II Pump Station. Park just past the pump station. Walk to the east and sample water from the stream flow just under the bridge. Temecula Creek at Pala Road is a Receiving Water Station. The Temecula Creek site, at an elevation of 968 feet, is located just east of the I-15 Freeway overpass, upstream of its confluence with Murrieta Creek. Creek flows are subsurface approximately 200 yards upstream (east) of the I-15 Freeway.
    [Show full text]
  • County of Riverside Santa Margarita Region Stormwater Management Plan
    COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE SANTA MARGARITA REGION STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN JULY 2005 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE SWMP TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 INTRODUCTION TO THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN............................ 2 2.1 Program Overview ....................................................................................................................... 2 2.2 Description of MS4 ...................................................................................................................... 2 3.0 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT .................................................................................................................. 4 3.1 County Departmental Responsibilities......................................................................................... 4 3.2 Watershed and County Cooperative Activities ............................................................................ 4 3.3 Fiscal Analysis ............................................................................................................................. 8 3.4 Legal Authority ............................................................................................................................ 9 3.5 Enforcement ............................................................................................................................... 10 4.0 ELIMINATION OF ILLICIT CONNECTIONS AND ILLEGAL
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal California Gnatcatcher Survey Report 2018
    Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Biological Monitoring Program 2018 Coastal California Gnatcatcher Survey and Nest Monitoring Report California Gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica californica) nestlings begging for food in 2018. 16 April 2019 2018 Coastal California Gnatcatcher Survey and Nest Monitoring Report TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 1 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ................................................................................................................... 2 METHODS ............................................................................................................................. 2 SURVEY DESIGN ................................................................................................................................ 2 FIELD METHODS ................................................................................................................................ 2 DATA ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................................ 3 TRAINING ........................................................................................................................................... 4 RESULTS .............................................................................................................................. 4 NEST SURVIVAL AND REPRODUCTION ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Southern California Steelhead Passage Assessment Lower Santa
    Southern California Steelhead Passage Assessment, Lower Santa Margarita River, California and CUP Surface Water Availability Analysis (TM 1.1) April 27, 2012 Prepared for: United States Bureau of Reclamation Fallbrook Public Utilities District United States Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton Prepared by: Stetson Engineers, Inc. San Rafael, CA with fish biology support from: Cardno ENTRIX Sacramento, CA TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE NO. TABLE OF CONTENTS ...................................................................................................................... I LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................... III LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................................. IV LIST OF APPENDICES ..................................................................................................................... VI ACRONYM AND ABBREVIATION LIST ........................................................................................... VII EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................. IX 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 STUDY AUTHORITY AND PURPOSE .........................................................................................................1-1 1.2 REPORT CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................1-1
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment D Monitoring Station Descriptions
    Attachment D Attachment D Monitoring Station Descriptions Attachment D – Description of Monitoring Stations Below is the legend for the maps within this section. Attachment D-1 Attachment D – Description of Monitoring Stations Station Name: Temecula Creek below Pala Road (Lower Temecula Creek) Hydstra1 Reference #: 902LTC777 Location: Latitude 33° 28 '28.14” N Longitude 117° 8' 19.84" W Elevation 1,008 ft Thomas Bros Pg 979B3 Classification: Receiving Water - Mass Loading Station & Stream Assessment Type of Channel: Natural River Receiving Water: Santa Margarita River Directions to the site: Drive south on the I-215 freeway and exit at SR 79 South/Old Town Front Street. Go west of the freeway and turn left at the first stoplight. Turn left about 100 feet past the stop light onto a gravel/dirt road. Turn right, before the yellow EMWD gate. Drive to the dirt road that goes left and up. Go about 100 feet and turn right onto the dirt road. Go about 1,700 feet and drive to where the dirt road meets up with the gravel road. Follow the gravel road to the L3437 Pala II Pump Station. Park just past the pump station. Walk to the east and sample water from the stream flow just under the bridge. Temecula Creek at Pala Road is a Receiving Water Station. The Temecula Creek site, at an elevation of 968 feet, is located just east of the I-15 Freeway overpass, upstream of its confluence with Murrieta Creek. Creek flows are subsurface approximately 200 yards upstream (east) of the I-15 Freeway.
    [Show full text]
  • Southwest Area Plan
    Southwest Area Plan Revised: April 16, 2019 This page intentionally left blank TABLE OF CONTENTS VISION SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................4 A Special Note on Implementing the Vision ................................................................................................5 LOCATION...........................................................................................................................................................6 FEATURES ..........................................................................................................................................................6 SETTING ......................................................................................................................................................... 11 UNIQUE FEATURES .......................................................................................................................................... 11 The Santa Rosa Plateau Ecological Reserve .......................................................................................... 11 Vail Lake ................................................................................................................................................... 12 The Cleveland National Forest ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]