DOCSLIB.ORG

Southern California Steelhead Passage Assessment Lower Santa

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Southern California Steelhead Passage Assessment Lower Santa Southern California Steelhead Passage Assessment, Lower Santa Margarita River, California and CUP Surface Water Availability Analysis (TM 1.1) April 27, 2012 Prepared for: United States Bureau of Reclamation Fallbrook Public Utilities District United States Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton Prepared by: Stetson Engineers, Inc. San Rafael, CA with fish biology support from: Cardno ENTRIX Sacramento, CA TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE NO. TABLE OF CONTENTS ...................................................................................................................... I LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................... III LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................................. IV LIST OF APPENDICES ..................................................................................................................... VI ACRONYM AND ABBREVIATION LIST ........................................................................................... VII EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................. IX 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 STUDY AUTHORITY AND PURPOSE .........................................................................................................1-1 1.2 REPORT CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................1-1 1.3 STUDY LOCATION ..................................................................................................................................1-2 1.4 PROJECT BACKGROUND .........................................................................................................................1-2 1.5 EXISTING FACILITIES AND OPERATIONS ON CPEN ................................................................................1-4 1.5.1Existing Facilities ..........................................................................................................................1-4 1.5.2Historical Groundwater Pumping and Surface Diversions ...........................................................1-6 1.6 SANTA MARGARITA RIVER CUP ...........................................................................................................1-7 1.6.1Project Facilities ............................................................................................................................1-7 1.6.2Project Groundwater Pumping and Surface Diversions ................................................................1-9 1.7 LEGAL HISTORY AND HISTORICAL WATER RIGHTS INVENTORY ......................................................... 1-10 1.7.11940 Stipulated Judgment ............................................................................................................ 1-10 1.7.2United States v Fallbrook Public Utility District (Case 1247) .................................................... 1-11 1.7.3Historical Water Rights Inventory ............................................................................................... 1-12 2.0 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA STEELHEAD TAXONOMY,LIFE HISTORY AND HABITAT .......... 2-1 2.1 CONSERVATION STATUS ........................................................................................................................2-1 2.2 SPECIES DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................................2-2 2.3 LIFE HISTORY ........................................................................................................................................2-2 2.4 STEELHEAD HABITAT ............................................................................................................................2-4 2.4.1Migration Habitat ..........................................................................................................................2-4 2.4.2Spawning and Rearing Habitat ......................................................................................................2-5 2.5 AVAILABLE HABITAT ON THE SANTA MARGARITA RIVER .....................................................................2-6 2.6 STEELHEAD OCCURRENCE IN THE SANTA MARGARITA RIVER ...............................................................2-8 3.0 FIELD SURVEY AND HYDRAULIC MODELING .................................................................... 3-1 3.1 TOPOGRAPHIC,GEOMORPHIC AND BIOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION ...................................................3-1 3.1.1Longitudinal Profile Survey to Identify Potential Fish Passage Barriers ......................................3-1 3.1.2Biological Survey and Habitat Characterization ...........................................................................3-2 3.1.3Characterization of Three Potential Critical Passage Sites ..........................................................3-3 3.2 HEC-RAS HYDRAULIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT ....................................................................................3-4 3.2.1HEC-RAS Model Calibration and Verification..............................................................................3-5 3.2.2HEC-RAS Model Simulations ........................................................................................................3-6 4.0 LOWER SANTA MARGARITA RIVER HYDROLOGY ............................................................ 4-1 4.1 CLIMATE AND PRECIPITATION ...............................................................................................................4-1 Stetson Engineers Inc./Cardno ENTRIX i April 27, 2012 Lower SMR Fish Passage Assessment 4.2 STREAMFLOW RECORDS AND DATA ......................................................................................................4-3 4.3 PREVIOUS HYDROLOGIC MODELING INVESTIGATION –INDICATORS OF HYDROLOGIC ALTERATION (IHA) .....................................................................................................................................................4-4 4.4 HYDROLOGIC PERIOD OF RECORD .........................................................................................................4-6 4.5 HYDROLOGIC PERIODS OF INVESTIGATION ............................................................................................4-7 4.5.1Hydrology during the Unimpaired Period .....................................................................................4-8 4.5.2Hydrology during the Recent Historical Period ............................................................................4-9 4.5.3Hydrology during the Future Project Period ............................................................................... 4-11 4.6 GROUNDWATER HYDROGEOLOGY ....................................................................................................... 4-12 4.6.1Camp Pendleton Groundwater Model and Development ............................................................ 4-12 4.6.2Model Structure and MODFLOW Stream Package ..................................................................... 4-13 4.6.3Groundwater Simulation for Unimpaired Period ........................................................................ 4-14 4.6.4Groundwater Simulation for Recent Historical Period ............................................................... 4-15 4.6.5Groundwater Simulation for Future Project Period .................................................................... 4-17 5.0 RESULTS OF ANADROMOUS FISH PASSAGE ASSESSMENT ................................................. 5-1 5.1 HABITAT CHARACTERISTICS WITHIN THE LOWER SANTA MARGARITA RIVER ......................................5-1 5.2 RESULTS OF THE CHANNEL HABITAT RECONNAISSANCE SURVEY .........................................................5-1 5.3 RESULTS OF THE HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS FOR FISH PASSAGE .................................................................5-2 5.3.1Passage Criteria ............................................................................................................................5-2 5.3.2Hydraulic Analysis Procedures ......................................................................................................5-3 5.3.3Determination of Minimum Fish Passage Flow Rates ...................................................................5-3 5.4 MAGNITUDE OF FLOW AT CRITICAL PASSAGE SITES .............................................................................5-4 5.4.1Unimpaired Flow Magnitude .........................................................................................................5-5 5.4.2Recent Historical Flow Magnitude ................................................................................................5-5 5.4.3Future Project Flow Magnitude .....................................................................................................5-6 5.5 PATTERN OF MINIMUM PASSAGE FLOW RATES .....................................................................................5-7 5.5.1Pattern of Flow during the Unimpaired Period .............................................................................5-7 5.5.2Pattern of Flow during Recent Historical Period ..........................................................................5-8 5.5.3Pattern of Flow during Future Project Period ..............................................................................5-9
Load more

Recommended publications
  • California Fire Siege 2007 an Overview Cover Photos from Top Clockwise: the Santiago Fire Threatens a Development on October 23, 2007
    CALIFORNIA FIRE SIEGE 2007 AN OVERVIEW Cover photos from top clockwise: The Santiago Fire threatens a development on October 23, 2007. (Photo credit: Scott Vickers, istockphoto) Image of Harris Fire taken from Ikhana unmanned aircraft on October 24, 2007. (Photo credit: NASA/U.S. Forest Service) A firefighter tries in vain to cool the flames of a wind-whipped blaze. (Photo credit: Dan Elliot) The American Red Cross acted quickly to establish evacuation centers during the siege. (Photo credit: American Red Cross) Opposite Page: Painting of Harris Fire by Kate Dore, based on photo by Wes Schultz. 2 Introductory Statement In October of 2007, a series of large wildfires ignited and burned hundreds of thousands of acres in Southern California. The fires displaced nearly one million residents, destroyed thousands of homes, and sadly took the lives of 10 people. Shortly after the fire siege began, a team was commissioned by CAL FIRE, the U.S. Forest Service and OES to gather data and measure the response from the numerous fire agencies involved. This report is the result of the team’s efforts and is based upon the best available information and all known facts that have been accumulated. In addition to outlining the fire conditions leading up to the 2007 siege, this report presents statistics —including availability of firefighting resources, acreage engaged, and weather conditions—alongside the strategies that were employed by fire commanders to create a complete day-by-day account of the firefighting effort. The ability to protect the lives, property, and natural resources of the residents of California is contingent upon the strength of cooperation and coordination among federal, state and local firefighting agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2019, Volume 65, Number 2
    The Journal of The Journal of SanSan DiegoDiego HistoryHistory The Journal of San Diego History The San Diego History Center, founded as the San Diego Historical Society in 1928, has always been the catalyst for the preservation and promotion of the history of the San Diego region. The San Diego History Center makes history interesting and fun and seeks to engage audiences of all ages in connecting the past to the present and to set the stage for where our community is headed in the future. The organization operates museums in two National Historic Districts, the San Diego History Center and Research Archives in Balboa Park, and the Junípero Serra Museum in Presidio Park. The History Center is a lifelong learning center for all members of the community, providing outstanding educational programs for schoolchildren and popular programs for families and adults. The Research Archives serves residents, scholars, students, and researchers onsite and online. With its rich historical content, archived material, and online photo gallery, the San Diego History Center’s website is used by more than 1 million visitors annually. The San Diego History Center is a Smithsonian Affiliate and one of the oldest and largest historical organizations on the West Coast. Front Cover: Illustration by contemporary artist Gene Locklear of Kumeyaay observing the settlement on Presidio Hill, c. 1770. Back Cover: View of Presidio Hill looking southwest, c. 1874 (SDHC #11675-2). Design and Layout: Allen Wynar Printing: Crest Offset Printing Copy Edits: Samantha Alberts Articles appearing in The Journal of San Diego History are abstracted and indexed in Historical Abstracts and America: History and Life.
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Margarita River Trail Preserve Acquisition
    COASTAL CONSERVANCY Staff Recommendation September 6, 2018 SANTA MARGARITA RIVER TRAIL PRESERVE ACQUISITION Project No. 18-015-01 Project Manager: Greg Gauthier RECOMMENDED ACTION: Authorization to disburse up to $9,750,000 to The Wildlands Conservancy for acquisition of approximately 1,390 acres along the Santa Margarita River for conservation and recreation purposes. LOCATION: Santa Margarita River, County of San Diego PROGRAM CATEGORY: Integrated Coastal and Marine Resource Protection EXHIBITS Exhibit 1: Project Location, Site Map, and APN Numbers Exhibit 2: Santa Margarita River Trail Preserve Photographs Exhibit 3: Project Letters RESOLUTION AND FINDINGS: Staff recommends that the State Coastal Conservancy adopt the following resolution pursuant to Chapter 5.5 of Division 21 of the Public Resources Code: “The State Coastal Conservancy hereby authorizes disbursement of an amount not to exceed nine million seven hundred fifty thousand dollars ($9,750,000) to The Wildlands Conservancy for acquisition of approximately 1,390 acres along the Santa Margarita River, as shown in Exhibit 1, for conservation and recreation purposes. This authorization is subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to disbursement of any funds for acquisition of the property, The Wildlands Conservancy shall submit for the review and approval of the Executive Officer of the Conservancy: a) all relevant acquisition documents, including the appraisal, agreement of purchase and sale, escrow instructions, deeds, and documents of title; b) a baseline conditions report; c) a monitoring and reporting plan; and d) evidence that sufficient funds are available to complete the acquisition. 2. The Wildlands Conservancy shall not pay more than fair market value for the property acquired pursuant to this authorization, as established in an appraisal approved by the Executive Officer.
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment B-4 San Diego RWQCB Basin Plan Beneficial Uses
    Attachment B-4 San Diego RWQCB Basin Plan Beneficial Uses Regulatory_Issues_Trends.doc CHAPTER 2 BENEFICIAL USES INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................1 BENEFICIAL USES ..........................................................................................................................1 BENEFICIAL USE DESIGNATION UNDER THE PORTER-COLOGNE WATER QUALITY CONTROL ACT ..1 BENEFICIAL USE DESIGNATION UNDER THE CLEAN WATER ACT .................................................2 BENEFICIAL USE DEFINITIONS.........................................................................................................3 EXISTING AND POTENTIAL BENEFICIAL USES ..................................................................................7 BENEFICIAL USES FOR SPECIFIC WATER BODIES ........................................................................8 DESIGNATION OF RARE BENEFICIAL USE ...................................................................................8 DESIGNATION OF COLD FRESHWATER HABITAT BENEFICIAL USE ...............................................9 DESIGNATION OF SPAWNING, REPRODUCTION, AND/ OR EARLY DEVELOPMENT (SPWN) BENEFICIAL USE ...................................................................................................11 SOURCES OF DRINKING WATER POLICY ..................................................................................11 EXCEPTIONS TO THE "SOURCES OF DRINKING WATER" POLICY................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Pacifying Paradise: Violence and Vigilantism in San Luis Obispo
    PACIFYING PARADISE: VIOLENCE AND VIGILANTISM IN SAN LUIS OBISPO A Thesis presented to the Faculty of California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in History by Joseph Hall-Patton June 2016 ii © 2016 Joseph Hall-Patton ALL RIGHTS RESERVED iii COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP TITLE: Pacifying Paradise: Violence and Vigilantism in San Luis Obispo AUTHOR: Joseph Hall-Patton DATE SUBMITTED: June 2016 COMMITTEE CHAIR: James Tejani, Ph.D. Associate Professor of History COMMITTEE MEMBER: Kathleen Murphy, Ph.D. Associate Professor of History COMMITTEE MEMBER: Kathleen Cairns, Ph.D. Lecturer of History iv ABSTRACT Pacifying Paradise: Violence and Vigilantism in San Luis Obispo Joseph Hall-Patton San Luis Obispo, California was a violent place in the 1850s with numerous murders and lynchings in staggering proportions. This thesis studies the rise of violence in SLO, its causation, and effects. The vigilance committee of 1858 represents the culmination of the violence that came from sweeping changes in the region, stemming from its earliest conquest by the Spanish. The mounting violence built upon itself as extensive changes took place. These changes include the conquest of California, from the Spanish mission period, Mexican and Alvarado revolutions, Mexican-American War, and the Gold Rush. The history of the county is explored until 1863 to garner an understanding of the borderlands violence therein. v TABLE OF CONTENTS Page CHAPTER INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………... 1 PART I - CAUSATION…………………………………………………… 12 HISTORIOGRAPHY……………………………………………........ 12 BEFORE CONQUEST………………………………………..…….. 21 WAR……………………………………………………………..……. 36 GOLD RUSH……………………………………………………..….. 42 LACK OF LAW…………………………………………………….…. 45 RACIAL DISTRUST………………………………………………..... 50 OUTSIDE INFLUENCE………………………………………………58 LOCAL CRIME………………………………………………………..67 CONCLUSION……………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Payment of Taxes As a Condition of Title by Adverse Possession: a Nineteenth Century Anachronism Averill Q
    Santa Clara Law Review Volume 9 | Number 1 Article 13 1-1-1969 Payment of Taxes as a Condition of Title by Adverse Possession: A Nineteenth Century Anachronism Averill Q. Mix Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/lawreview Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Averill Q. Mix, Comment, Payment of Taxes as a Condition of Title by Adverse Possession: A Nineteenth Century Anachronism, 9 Santa Clara Lawyer 244 (1969). Available at: http://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/lawreview/vol9/iss1/13 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Santa Clara Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Santa Clara Law Review by an authorized administrator of Santa Clara Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COMMENTS PAYMENT OF TAXES AS A CONDITION OF TITLE BY ADVERSE POSSESSION: A NINETEENTH CENTURY ANACHRONISM In California the basic statute governing the obtaining of title to land by adverse possession is section 325 of the Code of Civil Procedure.' This statute places California with the small minority of states that unconditionally require payment of taxes as a pre- requisite to obtaining such title. The logic of this requirement has been under continual attack almost from its inception.2 Some of its defenders state, however, that it serves to give the true owner notice of an attempt to claim his land adversely.' Superficially, the law in California today appears to be well settled, but litigation in which the tax payment requirement is a prominent issue continues to arise.
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Margarita River Watershed Annual Watermaster Report for the 2013-14 Water Year
    SANTA MARGARITA RIVER WATERSHED ANNUAL WATERMASTER REPORT WATER YEAR 2013-14 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. FALLBROOK PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT, ET AL. CIVIL NO. 51-CV-1247-GPC-RBB CHARLES W. BINDER WATERMASTER P. 0. BOX 631 FALLBROOK, CA 92088 (760) 728-1028 FAX (760) 728-1990 August 2015 WATERMASTER SANTA MARGARITA RIVER WATERSHED TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. SECTION 1 - SUMMARY ............................................................................................... 1 SECTION 2 - INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................... 5 2.1 Background ......................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Authority .............................................................................................................. 5 2.3 Scope .................................................................................................................. 5 SECTION 3 - SURFACE WATER AVAILABILITY AND USE ......................................... 7 3.1 Surface Flow ........................................................................................................ 7 3.2 Surface Water Diversions .................................................................................. 13 3.3 Water Storage ................................................................................................... 13 SECTION 4- SUBSURFACE WATER AVAILABILITY ................................................. 19 4.1 General .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 4 Tribal Nations of San Diego County This Chapter Presents an Overall Summary of the Tribal Nations of San Diego County and the Water Resources on Their Reservations
    4 Tribal Nations of San Diego County This chapter presents an overall summary of the Tribal Nations of San Diego County and the water resources on their reservations. A brief description of each Tribe, along with a summary of available information on each Tribe’s water resources, is provided. The water management issues provided by the Tribe’s representatives at the San Diego IRWM outreach meetings are also presented. 4.1 Reservations San Diego County features the largest number of Tribes and Reservations of any county in the United States. There are 18 federally-recognized Tribal Nation Reservations and 17 Tribal Governments, because the Barona and Viejas Bands share joint-trust and administrative responsibility for the Capitan Grande Reservation. All of the Tribes within the San Diego IRWM Region are also recognized as California Native American Tribes. These Reservation lands, which are governed by Tribal Nations, total approximately 127,000 acres or 198 square miles. The locations of the Tribal Reservations are presented in Figure 4-1 and summarized in Table 4-1. Two additional Tribal Governments do not have federally recognized lands: 1) the San Luis Rey Band of Luiseño Indians (though the Band remains active in the San Diego region) and 2) the Mount Laguna Band of Luiseño Indians. Note that there may appear to be inconsistencies related to population sizes of tribes in Table 4-1. This is because not all Tribes may choose to participate in population surveys, or may identify with multiple heritages. 4.2 Cultural Groups Native Americans within the San Diego IRWM Region generally comprise four distinct cultural groups (Kumeyaay/Diegueno, Luiseño, Cahuilla, and Cupeño), which are from two distinct language families (Uto-Aztecan and Yuman-Cochimi).
    [Show full text]
  • Recovering California Steelhead South of Santa Cruz
    THE OSPREY • ISSUE NO. 75 MAY 2013 15 Recovering California Steelhead South of Santa Cruz By Kurt Zimmerman, Tim Frahm and Sam Davidson — California Trout, Trout Unlimited — Kurt Zimmerman is Southern Steelhead genetics evince unique documents, intended to help achieve California Regional Manager for characteristics region-by-region (and recovery goals by describing strate - California Trout. Tim Frahm and Sam even watershed-by-watershed), as the gies and recommended actions likely Davidson are California Central Coast fish adapted to the particular condi - required to restore viable wild popula - Steelhead Coordinator and California tions and climate factors of coastal tions. Communications Manager for Trout streams from the Baja Peninsula to In early 2012, after years of public Unlimited. Visit their web sites at: Alaska. Today, steelhead south of San and agency input, NMFS released the www.caltrout.org Mateo County in California are catego - Final Southern California Recovery www.tucalifornia.org rized by the National Marine Fisheries Plan for the SCC steelhead. Later that Service (NMFS) into two “Distinct year, the agency released for public any anglers consider Population Segments” (DPS): the comment a Review Draft of the the steelhead trout (O. “South Central California Coastal” Recovery Plan for the South Central mykiss) the “perfect Coastal steelhead. These two Recovery fish.” Steelhead are Plans identify area-wide threats as widely revered for well as threats specific to particular Mtheir power and grace in the water, and watersheds. Common threats are the Steelhead have for the high challenge of actually three “Ds”: Dams, Diversions and catching one. Sport fishing for steel - declined across much Diminished Aquatic and Riparian head is a major contributor to many Habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • Groundwater Resources and Groundwater Quality
    Chapter 7: Groundwater Resources and Groundwater Quality Chapter 7 1 Groundwater Resources and 2 Groundwater Quality 3 7.1 Introduction 4 This chapter describes groundwater resources and groundwater quality in the 5 Study Area, and potential changes that could occur as a result of implementing the 6 alternatives evaluated in this Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). 7 Implementation of the alternatives could affect groundwater resources through 8 potential changes in operation of the Central Valley Project (CVP) and State 9 Water Project (SWP) and ecosystem restoration. 10 7.2 Regulatory Environment and Compliance 11 Requirements 12 Potential actions that could be implemented under the alternatives evaluated in 13 this EIS could affect groundwater resources in the areas along the rivers impacted 14 by changes in the operations of CVP or SWP reservoirs and in the vicinity of and 15 lands served by CVP and SWP water supplies. Groundwater basins that may be 16 affected by implementation of the alternatives are in the Trinity River Region, 17 Central Valley Region, San Francisco Bay Area Region, Central Coast Region, 18 and Southern California Region. 19 Actions located on public agency lands or implemented, funded, or approved by 20 Federal and state agencies would need to be compliant with appropriate Federal 21 and state agency policies and regulations, as summarized in Chapter 4, Approach 22 to Environmental Analyses. 23 Several of the state policies and regulations described in Chapter 4 have resulted 24 in specific institutional and operational conditions in California groundwater 25 basins, including the basin adjudication process, California Statewide 26 Groundwater Elevation Monitoring Program (CASGEM), California Sustainable 27 Groundwater Management Act (SGMA), and local groundwater management 28 ordinances, as summarized below.
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Margarita Water District 26111 Antonio Parkway, Rancho Santa Margarita, California 92688 DUNS: 0725288130000
    Las Flores Enhanced Water Reliability Project Grant Applicant: Maugauita Wat€u Distuict Santa Margarita Water District 26111 Antonio Parkway, Rancho Santa Margarita, California 92688 DUNS: 0725288130000 Project Manager: Mr. Don Bunts, PE 26111 Antonio Parkway, Rancho Santa Margarita, California 92688 Email: [email protected] Phone: (949) 459-6602 Fax: (949) 589-6243 Submittal Date: March 27, 2019 Submitted to: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation WaterSMART Drought Response Program: Drought Resiliency Projects for FY 2019, FOA No. BOR-DO-19-F003 Table of Contents Mandatory Federal Forms ........................................................................................................................... 3 Technical Proposal and Evaluation Criteria .............................................................................................. 3 Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Background Data ......................................................................................................................................... 3 Project Location ........................................................................................................................................... 6 Technical Project Description and Milestones .......................................................................................... 6 Performance Measures...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1 SETTLEMENT and RELEASE AGREEMENT This Settlement And
    SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT This Settlement and Release Agreement (“Agreement”) is entered into on October ___,26 2020 (the “Effective Date”), by and between the City of Temecula and City of Temecula City Council (the “City”); Ambient Communities, LLC and Temecula West Village, LLC (together referred to as “TWV”); Center for Biological Diversity, Sierra Club, Mountain Lion Foundation, and The Cougar Connection (collectively referred to as “CBD”); and Endangered Habitats League (“EHL”) (all referred to collectively as the “Parties” and, individually, a “Party”). RECITALS This Agreement is made with reference to, and in consideration of, the following facts and representations, which the Parties agree are true and correct: A. On December 12, 2017, the City Council of the City certified a final Environmental Impact Report (“EIR”) and approved other project entitlements (the “Approvals”) for the Altair Specific Plan (the “Project”). A map depicting the Project as approved is attached for reference purposes as Exhibit A. B. On January 11, 2018, CBD filed a Petition for Writ of Mandate and Complaint for Injunctive Relief alleging that Respondent City violated the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) and California planning and zoning laws in approving the EIR and the Approvals for the Project (the “CBD Petition”) in the action styled Center for Biological Diversity, et al. v. City of Temecula, et al. (Riverside County Superior Court Case No. RIC1800858) (the “CBD Action”). On January 10, 2019, CBD filed a First Amended and Supplemental Verified Petition for Writ of Mandate and Complaint for Injunctive Relief (the “Amended CBD Petition”), which added a claim alleging that the City had violated its duty to retain certain records.
    [Show full text]