Local Hazard Mitigation Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Local Hazard Mitigation Plan CITY OF RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN Lead Agency: CITY OF RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 22112 El Paseo Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688 Contact: Ms. Wendy Starks, AICP, Principal Planner Planning Department (949) 635-1807 Prepared by: MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL 5 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 500 Santa Ana, California 92707 Contact: Mr. Eddie Torres (949) 855-3612 GPA CONSULTING Contact: Ms. Starla Barker, AICP (310) 792-2690 December 2019 JN 169696 Rancho Santa Margarita Local Hazard Mitigation Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1.0 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Plan Purpose ............................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Plan Authority .............................................................................................................. 1-2 1.3 Plan Adoption ............................................................................................................. 1-3 1.4 Plan Organization ...................................................................................................... 1-3 1.5 Mitigation Goals ......................................................................................................... 1-4 Section 2.0 Planning Process ............................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Organizing Resources ................................................................................................ 2-1 2.1.1 Project Management Team ........................................................................ 2-2 2.1.2 LHMP Planning Team ..................................................................................... 2-2 2.1.3 Public Outreach ............................................................................................. 2-5 2.1.4 Review and Incorporate Existing Information ........................................... 2-7 2.2 Assess Risks ................................................................................................................... 2-7 2.2.1 Identify/Profile Hazards ................................................................................. 2-8 2.2.2 Assess Vulnerabilities ...................................................................................... 2-8 2.3 Develop Mitigation Plan ........................................................................................... 2-8 2.3.1 Identify Goals .................................................................................................. 2-8 2.3.2 Develop Capabilities Assessment ............................................................... 2-8 2.3.3 Identify Mitigation Actions ............................................................................ 2-8 2.3.4 Plan Review and Revision ............................................................................. 2-9 2.3.5 Plan Adoption and Submittal ...................................................................... 2-9 2.3.6 Plan Maintenance ......................................................................................... 2-9 Section 3.0 Community Profile ........................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Physical Setting ........................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 History ........................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.3 Demographics ............................................................................................................ 3-2 3.3.1 Population ....................................................................................................... 3-2 3.3.2 Educational Attainment ............................................................................... 3-7 3.3.3 Employment .................................................................................................... 3-8 3.3.4 Housing ............................................................................................................ 3-8 3.4 Land Uses and Existing Development .................................................................... 3-8 3.5 Development Trends and Future Development ................................................. 3-14 3.6 Infrastructure Systems .............................................................................................. 3-15 3.6.1 Transportation ............................................................................................... 3-15 3.6.2 Water and Wastewater .............................................................................. 3-16 3.6.3 Electricity ....................................................................................................... 3-16 December 2019 i Table of Contents Rancho Santa Margarita Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 3.6.4 Natural Gas ................................................................................................... 3-17 3.7 Critical Facilities and Facilities of Concern .......................................................... 3-17 Section 4.0 Hazard Assessment ......................................................................................... 4-1 4.1 Hazard Identification and Prioritization .................................................................. 4-1 4.2 Hazard Profiles ............................................................................................................ 4-6 4.2.1 Dam/Reservoir Failure .................................................................................. 4-6 4.2.2 Drought ........................................................................................................... 4-9 4.2.3 Flood ............................................................................................................. 4-14 4.2.4 Human-Induced Hazards .......................................................................... 4-22 4.2.5 Landslide/Mudflow ..................................................................................... 4-31 4.2.6 Pest Management and Disease .............................................................. 4-36 4.2.7 Seismic Hazards ........................................................................................... 4-41 4.2.8 Severe Weather .......................................................................................... 4-51 4.2.9 Wildfire .......................................................................................................... 4-58 4.3 Vulnerability/Risk Assessment ................................................................................. 4-66 Section 5.0 Mitigation Strategy .......................................................................................... 5-1 5.1 Hazard Mitigation Overview .................................................................................... 5-1 5.2 Hazard Mitigation Actions ........................................................................................ 5-4 5.3 Capabilities Assessment ............................................................................................ 5-9 Section 6.0 Plan Maintenance ........................................................................................... 6-1 6.1 Purpose of the Plan and Authority .......................................................................... 6-1 6.2 Method and Schedule for Updating the Plan within Five Years ........................ 6-3 6.3 Adoption ...................................................................................................................... 6-4 6.4 Implementation Through Existing Programs .......................................................... 6-5 6.5 Incorporation into Existing Planning Mechanisms ................................................ 6-5 6.6 Continued Public Involvement ................................................................................ 6-6 6.7 Point of Contact ......................................................................................................... 6-6 Section 7.0 References ....................................................................................................... 7-1 LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A City Adoption Resolution Appendix B Planning Process Documentation Table of Contents ii December 2019 Rancho Santa Margarita Local Hazard Mitigation Plan LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1-1 Disaster Response Cycle ..................................................................................... 1-1 Figure 3-1 Regional Location ................................................................................................ 3-3 Figure 3-2 City and Sphere of Influence ............................................................................. 3-5 Figure 3-3 General Plan Land Use Map .............................................................................. 3-9 Figure 3-4 Rancho Santa Margarita Planned Communities ......................................... 3-11 Figure 3-5 Rancho Santa Margarita Critical Facilities and Facilities of Concern ...... 3-23 Figure 4-1 Drought Monitor Map ....................................................................................... 4-11 Figure 4-2 U.S. Seasonal Drought Outlook ........................................................................ 4-13 Figure 4-3 Flood Hazard Zone ............................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • California Fire Siege 2007 an Overview Cover Photos from Top Clockwise: the Santiago Fire Threatens a Development on October 23, 2007
    CALIFORNIA FIRE SIEGE 2007 AN OVERVIEW Cover photos from top clockwise: The Santiago Fire threatens a development on October 23, 2007. (Photo credit: Scott Vickers, istockphoto) Image of Harris Fire taken from Ikhana unmanned aircraft on October 24, 2007. (Photo credit: NASA/U.S. Forest Service) A firefighter tries in vain to cool the flames of a wind-whipped blaze. (Photo credit: Dan Elliot) The American Red Cross acted quickly to establish evacuation centers during the siege. (Photo credit: American Red Cross) Opposite Page: Painting of Harris Fire by Kate Dore, based on photo by Wes Schultz. 2 Introductory Statement In October of 2007, a series of large wildfires ignited and burned hundreds of thousands of acres in Southern California. The fires displaced nearly one million residents, destroyed thousands of homes, and sadly took the lives of 10 people. Shortly after the fire siege began, a team was commissioned by CAL FIRE, the U.S. Forest Service and OES to gather data and measure the response from the numerous fire agencies involved. This report is the result of the team’s efforts and is based upon the best available information and all known facts that have been accumulated. In addition to outlining the fire conditions leading up to the 2007 siege, this report presents statistics —including availability of firefighting resources, acreage engaged, and weather conditions—alongside the strategies that were employed by fire commanders to create a complete day-by-day account of the firefighting effort. The ability to protect the lives, property, and natural resources of the residents of California is contingent upon the strength of cooperation and coordination among federal, state and local firefighting agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • UUSD Finances Discussed by ROB BURGESS the Daily Journal at the Oct
    Clash of unbeaten: Weekend MURDER TRIAL Patriots vs. Colts entertainment Jury to decide competency ...................Page 6 ..............Page 3 ...................................Page 8 INSIDE Mendocino County’s World briefly The Ukiah local newspaper ..........Page 2 Tomorrow: Plenty of sunshine; H 81º L 40º 7 58551 69301 0 THURSDAY Nov. 1, 2007 50 cents tax included DAILY JOURNAL ukiahdailyjournal.com 16 pages, Volume 149 Number 206 email: [email protected] UKIAH MAIN STREET PROGRAM HOSTS DOWNTOWN HALLOWEEN UUSD finances discussed By ROB BURGESS The Daily Journal At the Oct. 24 special meeting of the Ukiah Unified School District board at the district office, Cindy Plank, the district’s fiscal services director, presented the 2006-07 unaudited financial reports to the board. “At this point, the 2006-07 financial reports are considered unaudited,” Plank wrote in a let- ter addressed to Lois Nash, superintendent, and members of the board. “The Board What’s next? of Trustees must review and ap- ▲The Ukiah Unified prove the unaudit- School District has ed financial re- scheduled a special ports before the meeting of the board independent audit for tonight at the dis- can be completed. trict office boardroom Once the audit is at 925 N. State St. The completed, the meeting will begin at draft audit will be 5:30 p.m. with a closed submitted to the session, followed by a district for prelim- public session starting inary review and at 6 p.m. comment.” After a presentation by Plank, the board MacLeod Pappidas/The Daily Journal approved the statement unanimously. Delilah Iversen, 6, and Jacob Smith, 7, dressed in Halloween costumes, also serve as mannequins at Liv Fashion Highlights of the report include: Boutique on School Street Wednesday afternoon during Ukiah Main Street’s Downtown Halloween.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Fire Treatment Effectiveness for Hillslope Stabilization
    United States Department of Agriculture Post-Fire Treatment Forest Service Rocky Mountain Effectiveness for Research Station General Technical Hillslope Stabilization Report RMRS-GTR-240 August 2010 Peter R. Robichaud, Louise E. Ashmun, and Bruce D. Sims A SUMMARY OF KNOWLEDGE FROM THE Robichaud, Peter R.; Ashmun, Louise E.; Sims, Bruce D. 2010. Post-fire treatment effectiveness for hill- slope stabilization. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-240. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 62 p. Abstract This synthesis of post-fire treatment effectiveness reviews the past decade of research, monitoring, and product development related to post-fire hillslope emergency stabilization treatments, including erosion barri- ers, mulching, chemical soil treatments, and combinations of these treatments. In the past ten years, erosion barrier treatments (contour-felled logs and straw wattles) have declined in use and are now rarely applied as a post-fire hillslope treatment. In contrast, dry mulch treatments (agricultural straw, wood strands, wood shreds, etc.) have quickly gained acceptance as effective, though somewhat expensive, post-fire hillslope stabilization treatments and are frequently recommended when values-at-risk warrant protection. This change has been motivated by research that shows the proportion of exposed mineral soil (or conversely, the propor- tion of ground cover) to be the primary treatment factor controlling post-fire hillslope erosion. Erosion barrier treatments provide little ground cover and have been shown to be less effective than mulch, especially during short-duration, high intensity rainfall events. In addition, innovative options for producing and applying mulch materials have adapted these materials for use on large burned areas that are inaccessible by road.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2019, Volume 65, Number 2
    The Journal of The Journal of SanSan DiegoDiego HistoryHistory The Journal of San Diego History The San Diego History Center, founded as the San Diego Historical Society in 1928, has always been the catalyst for the preservation and promotion of the history of the San Diego region. The San Diego History Center makes history interesting and fun and seeks to engage audiences of all ages in connecting the past to the present and to set the stage for where our community is headed in the future. The organization operates museums in two National Historic Districts, the San Diego History Center and Research Archives in Balboa Park, and the Junípero Serra Museum in Presidio Park. The History Center is a lifelong learning center for all members of the community, providing outstanding educational programs for schoolchildren and popular programs for families and adults. The Research Archives serves residents, scholars, students, and researchers onsite and online. With its rich historical content, archived material, and online photo gallery, the San Diego History Center’s website is used by more than 1 million visitors annually. The San Diego History Center is a Smithsonian Affiliate and one of the oldest and largest historical organizations on the West Coast. Front Cover: Illustration by contemporary artist Gene Locklear of Kumeyaay observing the settlement on Presidio Hill, c. 1770. Back Cover: View of Presidio Hill looking southwest, c. 1874 (SDHC #11675-2). Design and Layout: Allen Wynar Printing: Crest Offset Printing Copy Edits: Samantha Alberts Articles appearing in The Journal of San Diego History are abstracted and indexed in Historical Abstracts and America: History and Life.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2007 Southern California Wildfires: Lessons in Complexity
    fire The 2007 Southern California Wildfires: Lessons in Complexity s is evidenced year after year, the na- ture of the “fire problem” in south- Jon E. Keeley, Hugh Safford, C.J. Fotheringham, A ern California differs from most of Janet Franklin, and Max Moritz the rest of the United States, both by nature and degree. Nationally, the highest losses in ϳ The 2007 wildfire season in southern California burned over 1,000,000 ac ( 400,000 ha) and property and life caused by wildfire occur in included several megafires. We use the 2007 fires as a case study to draw three major lessons about southern California, but, at the same time, wildfires and wildfire complexity in southern California. First, the great majority of large fires in expansion of housing into these fire-prone southern California occur in the autumn under the influence of Santa Ana windstorms. These fires also wildlands continues at an enormous pace cost the most to contain and cause the most damage to life and property, and the October 2007 fires (Safford 2007). Although modest areas of were no exception because thousands of homes were lost and seven people were killed. Being pushed conifer forest in the southern California by wind gusts over 100 kph, young fuels presented little barrier to their spread as the 2007 fires mountains experience the same negative ef- reburned considerable portions of the area burned in the historic 2003 fire season. Adding to the size fects of long-term fire suppression that are of these fires was the historic 2006–2007 drought that contributed to high dead fuel loads and long evident in other western forests (e.g., high distance spotting.
    [Show full text]
  • Pacifying Paradise: Violence and Vigilantism in San Luis Obispo
    PACIFYING PARADISE: VIOLENCE AND VIGILANTISM IN SAN LUIS OBISPO A Thesis presented to the Faculty of California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in History by Joseph Hall-Patton June 2016 ii © 2016 Joseph Hall-Patton ALL RIGHTS RESERVED iii COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP TITLE: Pacifying Paradise: Violence and Vigilantism in San Luis Obispo AUTHOR: Joseph Hall-Patton DATE SUBMITTED: June 2016 COMMITTEE CHAIR: James Tejani, Ph.D. Associate Professor of History COMMITTEE MEMBER: Kathleen Murphy, Ph.D. Associate Professor of History COMMITTEE MEMBER: Kathleen Cairns, Ph.D. Lecturer of History iv ABSTRACT Pacifying Paradise: Violence and Vigilantism in San Luis Obispo Joseph Hall-Patton San Luis Obispo, California was a violent place in the 1850s with numerous murders and lynchings in staggering proportions. This thesis studies the rise of violence in SLO, its causation, and effects. The vigilance committee of 1858 represents the culmination of the violence that came from sweeping changes in the region, stemming from its earliest conquest by the Spanish. The mounting violence built upon itself as extensive changes took place. These changes include the conquest of California, from the Spanish mission period, Mexican and Alvarado revolutions, Mexican-American War, and the Gold Rush. The history of the county is explored until 1863 to garner an understanding of the borderlands violence therein. v TABLE OF CONTENTS Page CHAPTER INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………... 1 PART I - CAUSATION…………………………………………………… 12 HISTORIOGRAPHY……………………………………………........ 12 BEFORE CONQUEST………………………………………..…….. 21 WAR……………………………………………………………..……. 36 GOLD RUSH……………………………………………………..….. 42 LACK OF LAW…………………………………………………….…. 45 RACIAL DISTRUST………………………………………………..... 50 OUTSIDE INFLUENCE………………………………………………58 LOCAL CRIME………………………………………………………..67 CONCLUSION……………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Payment of Taxes As a Condition of Title by Adverse Possession: a Nineteenth Century Anachronism Averill Q
    Santa Clara Law Review Volume 9 | Number 1 Article 13 1-1-1969 Payment of Taxes as a Condition of Title by Adverse Possession: A Nineteenth Century Anachronism Averill Q. Mix Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/lawreview Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Averill Q. Mix, Comment, Payment of Taxes as a Condition of Title by Adverse Possession: A Nineteenth Century Anachronism, 9 Santa Clara Lawyer 244 (1969). Available at: http://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/lawreview/vol9/iss1/13 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Santa Clara Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Santa Clara Law Review by an authorized administrator of Santa Clara Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COMMENTS PAYMENT OF TAXES AS A CONDITION OF TITLE BY ADVERSE POSSESSION: A NINETEENTH CENTURY ANACHRONISM In California the basic statute governing the obtaining of title to land by adverse possession is section 325 of the Code of Civil Procedure.' This statute places California with the small minority of states that unconditionally require payment of taxes as a pre- requisite to obtaining such title. The logic of this requirement has been under continual attack almost from its inception.2 Some of its defenders state, however, that it serves to give the true owner notice of an attempt to claim his land adversely.' Superficially, the law in California today appears to be well settled, but litigation in which the tax payment requirement is a prominent issue continues to arise.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Annual Report
    2020 ANNUAL REPORT CHIEF’S MESSAGE January 2, 2021 It is our pleasure to present our 2020 Annual Report to the community. We are proud to report our challenges and accomplishments to you in this very unique year. At the outset of the COVID-19 pandemic, your Montecito Fire Department set a goal to maintain our ability to provide exceptional emergency service to our community despite the challenges presented by the global health crisis. Thanks to the commitment and dedication of every member of the organization, we achieved that goal. The organization suffered no staffing or service issues which enabled us to continue to serve this great community. We also strived to support the community in whatever way possible as residents, businesses, and visitors faced challenges presented by the pandemic. As I write this message, two vaccines are nearing emergency approval and we anxiously await the opportunity for our entire community to be vaccinated. We continue to collaborate with neighboring fire departments, community service organizations, and other local government entities. These partnerships provide the foundation to effectively address community issues together to the benefit of all. In 2020, the Fire District collaborated with the Montecito Association on an outreach project called Hands Across Montecito. This program helps connect homeless people to resources and find permanent housing solutions. Additionally, the Fire Chiefs Association of Santa Barbara County established a public safety task force to identify solutions to parking issues that impede emergency vehicle access and community member egress. The task force is also addressing how to mitigate homeless encampment fires and illegal dispersed camping.
    [Show full text]
  • ESF[Type the Document Title]
    2008 Weather Support to the FEMA/DHS Joint Field Office Established in Response to the Devastating Southern California ESF[Type Wildfires[Pick the date] of October 2007 An Incident Support Specialist Overview the Abstract: On October 24, 2007, President George W. Bush, signed a Major Disaster Declaration for the State of California document for severe wildfires affecting Southern California. The Disaster Declaration [Year]put into motion federally funded and state title] coordinated response and recovery efforts, including establishing a FEMA/DHS Joint Field Office. Weather support for this function was provided by an Incident Support Specialist (ISS) [Type the abstract of thefrom document the here. National The abstract Weather is typically Service a short in [Type the Los Angeles/Oxnard, summary of the contentsCalifornia. of the document. This Type paper the abstract is an of overviewthe ofdocument those local efforts, document here. The abstractincluding is typically the a short products summary of andthe contents services provided, and an of the document.] examination of the complexities involved. subtitle] It also discusses the lessons learned and the successes realized. Todd Morris Physical Scientist WFO Los Angeles/Oxnard Table of Contents I. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................3 II. Background .......................................................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment
    United States Department of Agriculture Environmental Assessment Forest Service Silverado Fuel Break March 2013 Trabuco Ranger District, Cleveland National Forest Orange and Riverside Counties, California For More Information Contact: Jacob Gipson Trabuco Ranger District Cleveland National Forest 1147 East 6th Street, Corona, CA 92879 Phone: 951-736-1811 Non-Discrimination Policy The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination against its customers, employees, and applicants for employment on the bases of race, color, national origin, age, disability, sex, gender identity, religion, reprisal, and where applicable, political beliefs, marital status, familial or parental status, sexual orientation, or all or part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program, or protected genetic information in employment or in any program or activity conducted or funded by the Department. (Not all prohibited bases will apply to all programs and/or employment activities.) To File an Employment Complaint If you wish to file an employment complaint, you must contact your agency's EEO Counselor (PDF) within 45 days of the date of the alleged discriminatory act, event, or in the case of a personnel action. Additional information can be found online at www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_file.html. To File a Program Complaint If you wish to file a Civil Rights program complaint of discrimination, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form (PDF), found online at www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html, or at any USDA office, or call (866) 632-9992 to request the form. You may also write a letter containing all of the information requested in the form.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Fires in California
    Report On Fires In California Gymnospermous Terencio requires mighty while Quill always hirsling his antispasmodic trumps retrally, he besmirches so diabolically. Is Herschel conventionalized or locular after pandurate Porter catalyses so acidly? Zacharia still revictuals morphologically while complaining Schroeder scry that colonic. All of Calabasas is now under mandatory evacuation due trial the Woolsey fire, department city announced Sunday evening. Unlock an ad free cover now! In this Saturday, Sept. Yucaipa Blvd to Ave E southeast to the intersection of Mesa Grande, east to Wildwood Canyon Rd to trail all portions of Hidden Meadows and the southern portion of the Cherry Valley away from Nancy Lane coming to Beaumont Ave. Angeles National Forest that this been threatened by friendly Fire. As the climate heats up, than other states in their West, including Oregon and Colorado, are seeing larger, more devastating fires and more dangerous air aside from wildfire smoke. Account Status Pending It looks like you started to grease an exhibit but did share complete it. CAL FIRE investigators determined that fire started in two locations. Mouillot F, Field CB. Groups of people walked along the parking lot up the Goebel adult center Friday morning, girl with masks over their noses and others still scrape their pajamas from their first morning escapes. Check high fire ban situation in their area. Another among people refusing to evacuate. Here can, however, ratio are gaps where municipalities lack police authority we act and statewide action is required. Large swaths of Ventura and Los Angeles counties are down under evacuation orders due provide the fires.
    [Show full text]
  • Initial Study-Mitigated Negative Declaration Saddleback Community Church Expansion Project
    Final Mitigated Negative Declaration Response to Comments on Draft Initial Study-Mitigated Negative Declaration Saddleback Community Church Expansion Project Subject: Response to Public Review Comments and Final Mitigated Negative Declaration This document has been prepared to respond to comments received on the Draft Initial Study-Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS-MND) prepared for the Saddleback Community Church Expansion Project (SCH#2019109096). The Draft IS-MND found that with implementation of the mitigation measures, impacts on the environment from the proposed project were less than significant. The list of comment letters received by the City of Lake Forest are listed below. Letter No. and Commenting Agency Date 1 State Clearinghouse December 3, 2019 2 California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), District 12 December 2, 2019 None of the comments received identified new impacts or resulted in a substantial increase in the severity of impacts. Responses to the comments received do not constitute new information that warrants recirculation of the Draft IS-MND. This Response to Comments (RTC) Document provides responses to comments received. Per the comments received, no changes to the Draft IS-MND were necessary. This RTC Document, together with the Draft IS-MND, constitutes the Final IS-MND for the Saddleback Community Church Expansion Project. Amanda Lauffer Date of Issuance of Associate Planner Final Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Lake Forest Saddleback Community Church Expansion Project Responses to Comments on the Draft IS-MND 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 PURPOSE OF THE RESPONSE TO COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT IS-MND This document is in response to comments received on the Draft Initial Study-Mitigated Negative Declaration (Draft IS-MND) prepared for the proposed Saddleback Community Church Expansion Project (project).
    [Show full text]