DOCSLIB.ORG

Initial Study-Mitigated Negative Declaration Saddleback Community Church Expansion Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Final Mitigated Negative Declaration Response to Comments on Draft Initial Study-Mitigated Negative Declaration Saddleback Community Church Expansion Project Subject: Response to Public Review Comments and Final Mitigated Negative Declaration This document has been prepared to respond to comments received on the Draft Initial Study-Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS-MND) prepared for the Saddleback Community Church Expansion Project (SCH#2019109096). The Draft IS-MND found that with implementation of the mitigation measures, impacts on the environment from the proposed project were less than significant. The list of comment letters received by the City of Lake Forest are listed below. Letter No. and Commenting Agency Date 1 State Clearinghouse December 3, 2019 2 California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), District 12 December 2, 2019 None of the comments received identified new impacts or resulted in a substantial increase in the severity of impacts. Responses to the comments received do not constitute new information that warrants recirculation of the Draft IS-MND. This Response to Comments (RTC) Document provides responses to comments received. Per the comments received, no changes to the Draft IS-MND were necessary. This RTC Document, together with the Draft IS-MND, constitutes the Final IS-MND for the Saddleback Community Church Expansion Project. Amanda Lauffer Date of Issuance of Associate Planner Final Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Lake Forest Saddleback Community Church Expansion Project Responses to Comments on the Draft IS-MND 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 PURPOSE OF THE RESPONSE TO COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT IS-MND This document is in response to comments received on the Draft Initial Study-Mitigated Negative Declaration (Draft IS-MND) prepared for the proposed Saddleback Community Church Expansion Project (project). The Draft IS-MND identifies the potential environmental impacts associated with development of the project and recommends mitigation measures to reduce potentially significant impacts. This Response to Comments (RTC) document, together with the Draft IS-MND, constitutes the Final IS-MND for the proposed project. 1.2 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), lead agencies are required to consult with public agencies having jurisdiction over a proposed project and to provide the general public with an opportunity to comment on the Draft IS-MND. The Draft IS-MND was made available for public review on October 31, 2019. Copies of the Notice of Intent to Adopt the Draft IS-MND were posted to the Orange County Clerk and the Saddleback News. The Draft IS-MND and a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration were posted electronically on the City's website, and a paper copy was available for public review at the City of Lake Forest Planning Division and at the El Toro Library and Foothill Ranch Library. In addition, the Draft IS-MND was mailed to the State Clearinghouse to be distributed to applicable state agencies. The Draft IS-MND public comment period began on October 31, 2019 and ended December 2, 2019. The City received two comment letters on the Draft IS-MND. Copies of written comments received during the comment period are included in Chapter 2 of this document. 1.3 DOCUMENT ORGANIZATION This RTC Document consists of the following chapters: Chapter 1: Introduction. This chapter discusses the purpose and organization of this RTC Document and the Final IS-MND and summarizes the environmental review process for the project. Chapter 2: Comments and Responses. This chapter contains reproductions of the comment letters received on the Draft IS-MND. A written response for each CEQA-related comment received during the public review period is provided. Each response is keyed to the corresponding comment. Chapter 3: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. This chapter contains the project’s Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, including Draft IS-MND. As described below, no corrections to the Draft IS-MND are necessary considering the comments received. The Draft IS-MND, as published for public review, is included for reference after this RTC document. 1 City of Lake Forest Saddleback Community Church Expansion Project Responses to Comments on the Draft IS-MND 2. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES This chapter includes comments received during the circulation of the Draft IS-MND prepared for the project. The Draft IS-MND was circulated for public review beginning on October 31, 2019 and ending December 2, 2019. The City received two comment letters on the Draft IS-MND. The commenters and the page number on which each commenter’s letter appear are listed below. Letter No. and Commenter Agency/Group/Organization/Individual Page No. Federal and State Agencies 1. Scott Morgan, Director State Clearinghouse 3 2. Scott Shelley, Branch Chief California Department of Transportation 5 (Caltrans), District 12 The comment letters and responses follow. The comment letters have been numbered sequentially and each separate CEQA issue raised by the commenter has been assigned a number. The responses to each comment identify first the number of the comment letter, and then the number assigned to each issue (Response 1.1, for example, indicates that the response is for the first issue raised in Comment Letter 1). As described below, no corrections to the Draft IS-MND are necessary considering the comments received. The Draft IS-MND, as published for public review, is included for reference after this RTC document. Final Initial Study-Mitigated Negative Declaration 2 Letter 1 1 City of Lake Forest Saddleback Community Church Expansion Project Responses to Comments on the Draft IS-MND Letter 1 COMMENTER: Scott Morgan, Director, State Clearinghouse DATE: December 3, 2019 Response 1.1 The letter acknowledges that the City of Lake Forest has complied with the State Clearinghouse review requirements for draft environmental documents, pursuant to CEQA. Per the referenced website in the letter, the State Clearinghouse received one letter regarding the project during public review, from Caltrans District 12. Responses to the Caltrans District 12 letter are provided below under Letter 2. Final Initial Study-Mitigated Negative Declaration 4 Letter 2 1 2 City of Lake Forest Saddleback Community Church Expansion Project Responses to Comments on the Draft IS-MND Letter 2 COMMENTER: Scott Shelley, Branch Chief, Regional-IGR-Transit Planning, California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), District 12 DATE: December 2, 2019 Response 2.1 The comment recommends the inclusion of bike parking to be consistent with state goals to increase active transportation and reduce VMT. As discussed under Section 8, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Question B of the Draft IS-MND, the project would provide on-site bike racks. Like the existing use, the proposed project would be easily accessible from the bike trails and bike lanes mentioned in the comment. The bike parking would be designed in conformance with applicable standards. Response 2.2 The comment discusses work within the State Right-of-Way and if such work is to occur, encroachment permits and addressing of environmental concerns required. Project construction would occur within the existing Saddleback Community Church campus and would not occur within State Right-of-Way. Final Initial Study-Mitigated Negative Declaration 7 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 3. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program This document is the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) for the Saddleback Community Church Expansion Project (project), located on the existing Saddleback Community Church campus, at 1 Saddleback Parkway in the City of Lake Forest. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), requires that a Lead Agency adopt an MMRP before approving a project in order to mitigate or avoid significant impacts that have been identified in an Initial Study-Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS-MND) (Public Resources Code Section 21081.6[a]). The purpose of the MMRP is to ensure that the required mitigation measures identified in the IS-MND are implemented as part of overall project implementation. In addition to ensuring implementation of mitigation measures, the MMRP provides feedback to agency staff and decision-makers during project implementation, and identifies the need for enforcement action before irreversible environmental damage occurs. Table 1, below, summarizes the mitigation measures for each issue area identified in the IS-MND for the project. The table identifies each mitigation measure; the action required for the measure to be implemented; the time at which the monitoring is to occur; the monitoring frequency; and the agency or party responsible for ensuring that the monitoring is performed. In addition, the table includes columns for compliance verification. Where an impact was identified to be less than significant, no mitigation measures were required. The mitigation measures contained herein shall be included as conditions of approval for the project, to the extent permitted by law. The City of Lake Forest shall ensure that all construction plans and project operations conform to the conditions of the mitigated project. Final Initial Study – Mitigated Negative Declaration I-1 City of Lake Forest Saddleback Community Church Expansion Project Responsible Compliance Verification Agency or When Monitoring to Monitoring Impact Mitigation Measure Action Party Occur Frequency Initial Date Comments Air Quality AQ-1:
Recommended publications
  • California Fire Siege 2007 an Overview Cover Photos from Top Clockwise: the Santiago Fire Threatens a Development on October 23, 2007

    California Fire Siege 2007 an Overview Cover Photos from Top Clockwise: the Santiago Fire Threatens a Development on October 23, 2007

    CALIFORNIA FIRE SIEGE 2007 AN OVERVIEW Cover photos from top clockwise: The Santiago Fire threatens a development on October 23, 2007. (Photo credit: Scott Vickers, istockphoto) Image of Harris Fire taken from Ikhana unmanned aircraft on October 24, 2007. (Photo credit: NASA/U.S. Forest Service) A firefighter tries in vain to cool the flames of a wind-whipped blaze. (Photo credit: Dan Elliot) The American Red Cross acted quickly to establish evacuation centers during the siege. (Photo credit: American Red Cross) Opposite Page: Painting of Harris Fire by Kate Dore, based on photo by Wes Schultz. 2 Introductory Statement In October of 2007, a series of large wildfires ignited and burned hundreds of thousands of acres in Southern California. The fires displaced nearly one million residents, destroyed thousands of homes, and sadly took the lives of 10 people. Shortly after the fire siege began, a team was commissioned by CAL FIRE, the U.S. Forest Service and OES to gather data and measure the response from the numerous fire agencies involved. This report is the result of the team’s efforts and is based upon the best available information and all known facts that have been accumulated. In addition to outlining the fire conditions leading up to the 2007 siege, this report presents statistics —including availability of firefighting resources, acreage engaged, and weather conditions—alongside the strategies that were employed by fire commanders to create a complete day-by-day account of the firefighting effort. The ability to protect the lives, property, and natural resources of the residents of California is contingent upon the strength of cooperation and coordination among federal, state and local firefighting agencies.
  • UUSD Finances Discussed by ROB BURGESS the Daily Journal at the Oct

    UUSD Finances Discussed by ROB BURGESS the Daily Journal at the Oct

    Clash of unbeaten: Weekend MURDER TRIAL Patriots vs. Colts entertainment Jury to decide competency ...................Page 6 ..............Page 3 ...................................Page 8 INSIDE Mendocino County’s World briefly The Ukiah local newspaper ..........Page 2 Tomorrow: Plenty of sunshine; H 81º L 40º 7 58551 69301 0 THURSDAY Nov. 1, 2007 50 cents tax included DAILY JOURNAL ukiahdailyjournal.com 16 pages, Volume 149 Number 206 email: [email protected] UKIAH MAIN STREET PROGRAM HOSTS DOWNTOWN HALLOWEEN UUSD finances discussed By ROB BURGESS The Daily Journal At the Oct. 24 special meeting of the Ukiah Unified School District board at the district office, Cindy Plank, the district’s fiscal services director, presented the 2006-07 unaudited financial reports to the board. “At this point, the 2006-07 financial reports are considered unaudited,” Plank wrote in a let- ter addressed to Lois Nash, superintendent, and members of the board. “The Board What’s next? of Trustees must review and ap- ▲The Ukiah Unified prove the unaudit- School District has ed financial re- scheduled a special ports before the meeting of the board independent audit for tonight at the dis- can be completed. trict office boardroom Once the audit is at 925 N. State St. The completed, the meeting will begin at draft audit will be 5:30 p.m. with a closed submitted to the session, followed by a district for prelim- public session starting inary review and at 6 p.m. comment.” After a presentation by Plank, the board MacLeod Pappidas/The Daily Journal approved the statement unanimously. Delilah Iversen, 6, and Jacob Smith, 7, dressed in Halloween costumes, also serve as mannequins at Liv Fashion Highlights of the report include: Boutique on School Street Wednesday afternoon during Ukiah Main Street’s Downtown Halloween.
  • Post-Fire Treatment Effectiveness for Hillslope Stabilization

    Post-Fire Treatment Effectiveness for Hillslope Stabilization

    United States Department of Agriculture Post-Fire Treatment Forest Service Rocky Mountain Effectiveness for Research Station General Technical Hillslope Stabilization Report RMRS-GTR-240 August 2010 Peter R. Robichaud, Louise E. Ashmun, and Bruce D. Sims A SUMMARY OF KNOWLEDGE FROM THE Robichaud, Peter R.; Ashmun, Louise E.; Sims, Bruce D. 2010. Post-fire treatment effectiveness for hill- slope stabilization. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-240. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 62 p. Abstract This synthesis of post-fire treatment effectiveness reviews the past decade of research, monitoring, and product development related to post-fire hillslope emergency stabilization treatments, including erosion barri- ers, mulching, chemical soil treatments, and combinations of these treatments. In the past ten years, erosion barrier treatments (contour-felled logs and straw wattles) have declined in use and are now rarely applied as a post-fire hillslope treatment. In contrast, dry mulch treatments (agricultural straw, wood strands, wood shreds, etc.) have quickly gained acceptance as effective, though somewhat expensive, post-fire hillslope stabilization treatments and are frequently recommended when values-at-risk warrant protection. This change has been motivated by research that shows the proportion of exposed mineral soil (or conversely, the propor- tion of ground cover) to be the primary treatment factor controlling post-fire hillslope erosion. Erosion barrier treatments provide little ground cover and have been shown to be less effective than mulch, especially during short-duration, high intensity rainfall events. In addition, innovative options for producing and applying mulch materials have adapted these materials for use on large burned areas that are inaccessible by road.
  • When the Next Fire Comes, Will You Be Ready?

    When the Next Fire Comes, Will You Be Ready?

    Carbon Canyon FSC The Carbon Canyon Fire Safe Council’s mission is: Board of Directors to preserve our canyon’s natural and man-made resources on public and private property by development and enforcement Carbon Canyon FSC President: Charlie Blank of ecologically sound and appropriate fire safety measures. P.O. Box 1328 Vice President: Eric Johnson FALL 2019 NEWSLETTER Chino Hills, CA 91709 Secretary-Treasurer: Paul Spitzzeri When the Next Fire Comes, Will You Be Ready? Fire Station Open House The Fire Safe Council Chino Valley Fire District Open House at will be hosting an event on Station 61 (5078 Schaefer Ave., Chino) and the Wildfire Emergency Fire training center (5092 Schaefer Ave., Chino) will Preparedness on Sunday, Schlotterbeck Melanie be hosted on Saturday, October 12th from 9 AM September 8th. It runs from to 2 PM. 2:00 – 4:00 PM at Western 2008 Fire Remembered Hills Golf Course at 1800 Canyon residents came to the Chino Hills • Meet your local firefighters Carbon Canyon Road in State Park Discovery Center to remember and reflect • Tour the fire station and training facility Chino Hills. Let’s remember on the devastation of the Freeway Complex Fire. They • See the fire engines that respond to together and learn from were joined by hosts including Hills For Everyone, emergencies each other all that we each Carbon Canyon Fire Safe Council, Chino Valley • Watch live demonstrations can do to prepare for the Independent Fire District, Brea Fire, and the Chino • Learn valuable safety tips Ed Schumann next fire. Hills State Park Interpretive Association. Photo poster There will be boards, photo albums, fire preparedness materials presentations, starting at 2, on preparing your house and videos were on display.
  • The 2007 Southern California Wildfires: Lessons in Complexity

    The 2007 Southern California Wildfires: Lessons in Complexity

    fire The 2007 Southern California Wildfires: Lessons in Complexity s is evidenced year after year, the na- ture of the “fire problem” in south- Jon E. Keeley, Hugh Safford, C.J. Fotheringham, A ern California differs from most of Janet Franklin, and Max Moritz the rest of the United States, both by nature and degree. Nationally, the highest losses in ϳ The 2007 wildfire season in southern California burned over 1,000,000 ac ( 400,000 ha) and property and life caused by wildfire occur in included several megafires. We use the 2007 fires as a case study to draw three major lessons about southern California, but, at the same time, wildfires and wildfire complexity in southern California. First, the great majority of large fires in expansion of housing into these fire-prone southern California occur in the autumn under the influence of Santa Ana windstorms. These fires also wildlands continues at an enormous pace cost the most to contain and cause the most damage to life and property, and the October 2007 fires (Safford 2007). Although modest areas of were no exception because thousands of homes were lost and seven people were killed. Being pushed conifer forest in the southern California by wind gusts over 100 kph, young fuels presented little barrier to their spread as the 2007 fires mountains experience the same negative ef- reburned considerable portions of the area burned in the historic 2003 fire season. Adding to the size fects of long-term fire suppression that are of these fires was the historic 2006–2007 drought that contributed to high dead fuel loads and long evident in other western forests (e.g., high distance spotting.
  • “Loving the Sinner, Hating the Sin”: an Analysis of American

    “Loving the Sinner, Hating the Sin”: an Analysis of American

    1 “LOVING THE SINNER, HATING THE SIN”: AN ANALYSIS OF AMERICAN MEGACHURCH RHETORIC OF HOMOSEXUALITY Presented to The Faculty of the Department of Religion The Colorado College In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Bachelor of Arts By Ann Duncan May/2014 2 Introduction Recently the issue of homosexuality has come to represent a majorly divisive factor within American Christianity as more and more churches are defining their boundaries, or lack thereof, at homosexuality: many congregations believe that practicing homosexuality is not an acceptable aspect of one’s life that will allow passage into God’s Kingdom or salvation. Within megachurches, Protestant churches having at least 2,000 attendees per week, homosexuality often presents itself as a divisive and controversial issue. Megachurches tend to be situated on the more conservative and evangelical end of the spectrum of Protestant Christianity and, therefore, many of their congregations have expressed disapproval of homosexuality; they preach doctrines providing content for rhetoric following the guidelines of sexual purity as follows from divine law within their congregations. These doctrines include the biblical literalist approach to abiding by divine law, the presence of sin in today’s world, and the conscious choice to continue living a life in sin. It is through the combination of these doctrines, one choosing to act in a sinful manner going against the divine law accepted when one takes a literal approach to the Bible, which allows megachurches to arrive at the conclusion that the “homosexual lifestyle” constitutes a sin worthy of condemnation. However, megachurches are also using rhetoric of love and acceptance regardless of sexuality.
  • Appendix 9-11 Wildfire Tech Reports

    Appendix 9-11 Wildfire Tech Reports

    APPENDIX 9.11 WILDFIRE TECHNICAL REPORTS ACCEPTED DRAFT Murrieta Hills FIRE PROTECTION TECHNICAL REPORT Plan No. SP 012-3164, TTM 35853 Prepared for: Murrieta Fire and Rescue 41825 Juniper Street Murrieta, California 92562 Contact: Scott Ferguson, Fire Chief On behalf of Applicant: Benchmark Pacific 550 Laguna Drive, Suite B Carlsbad, California 92008 Contact: Richard Robotta, Vice President Prepared by: 605 Third Street Encinitas, California 92024 Contact: Michael Huff, Principal AUGUST 2019 Printed on 30% post-consumer recycled material. Murrieta Hills Fire Protection Technical Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page No. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................... V ES.1 Findings for Maximum Dead-End Road Length .................................................. vii 1 INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................1 1.1 Intent ....................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Applicable Codes/Existing Regulations ................................................................. 2 1.3 Proposed Project Summary ..................................................................................... 3 1.3.1 Location ...................................................................................................... 3 1.3.2 Current Site and Vicinity Land Use ...........................................................
  • 4. Responses to Comments

    4. Responses to Comments

    Responses to Comments Final Environmental Impact Report page 23 4. Responses to Comments A. Topical Responses Topical Response 1 – Fire Hazard This response is provided to address topical issues that were identified several times within the comment letters on the DEIR. Reference to this Topical Response is noted in response individual comment letters on this topic. Seven fires have burned within one mile of the Project site over the historic fire data record as shown on Exhibit 5-65 - Fire History Map on page 5-284 of the DEIR. The average interval between wildfires in the area was calculated to be 5.5 years with intervals ranging between 0 years (multiple fires in the same year) and 12 years. As shown below, the interval between fires on the Project site has been much greater with a 28-year interval between the Owl Fire and the Freeway Complex Fire. Historical records show that three wildfires have burned within the Project site since the beginning of the historical fire data record: • Santa Ana Canyon Fire in 1943 • Owl Fire in 1980 • Freeway Complex Fire in 2008 The Fire Protection and Emergency Evacuation Plan (FPEP) prepared by Dudek (June 2013) was used to assess the existing condition and the historical fire data, and to provide recommendations for minimizing the risks associated with potential future fire events. The FPEP is included in the DEIR as Appendix J and is analyzed in DEIR Section 5.7 (Hazards and Hazardous Materials). The preparers of the FPEP reviewed numerous information sources during the analysis phase of the document’s preparation.
  • ESF[Type the Document Title]

    ESF[Type the Document Title]

    2008 Weather Support to the FEMA/DHS Joint Field Office Established in Response to the Devastating Southern California ESF[Type Wildfires[Pick the date] of October 2007 An Incident Support Specialist Overview the Abstract: On October 24, 2007, President George W. Bush, signed a Major Disaster Declaration for the State of California document for severe wildfires affecting Southern California. The Disaster Declaration [Year]put into motion federally funded and state title] coordinated response and recovery efforts, including establishing a FEMA/DHS Joint Field Office. Weather support for this function was provided by an Incident Support Specialist (ISS) [Type the abstract of thefrom document the here. National The abstract Weather is typically Service a short in [Type the Los Angeles/Oxnard, summary of the contentsCalifornia. of the document. This Type paper the abstract is an of overviewthe ofdocument those local efforts, document here. The abstractincluding is typically the a short products summary of andthe contents services provided, and an of the document.] examination of the complexities involved. subtitle] It also discusses the lessons learned and the successes realized. Todd Morris Physical Scientist WFO Los Angeles/Oxnard Table of Contents I. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................3 II. Background .......................................................................................................................................4
  • Fire Services Operational Assessment

    Fire Services Operational Assessment

    OTAY RANCH VILLAGE RESORT Village 13 FIRE SERVICES OPERATIONAL ASSESSMENT Prepared for the San Diego County Fire Authority, by: EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT Feb. 1, 2020 Table of Contents Page The Project 2 Analysis Approach 2 Site Characterization 4 Climate 4 Fire History 5 Wildfire Factors 7 Offshore Winds 7 Onshore Winds 7 Fuels 8 Topography 8 Fire Behavior 9 Rate of Spread 9 Worst-Case Fire Trajectory 1 0 Spotting and Fire Branding 1 0 Fire Ignition Sources 11 Fire Modeling 11 Public Safety Actions 1 1 Evacuation 12 Temporary Safe Refuge 12 Public Safety Action Points 13 Emergency Messaging 13 Evacuation Center Locations 13 Fire Services 14 Fire Services Providers 14 Fire Service Response 15 Response Time Analysis 15 Compaction of Development 16 I mplications for Wildfire Operations 1 7 Potential Worst-Case Loss 17 Development Wildfire Resistance 19 Water Systems 19 Construction 19 Fuel Modification 20 Additional Measures 21 Summary of Findings 22 Significant Changes 23 References 24 The Project Otay Ranch Resort Village- Village 13 is a proposed planned community development, immediately north of Lower Otay Lake and east of the City of Chula Vista, California. This report collectively refers to the project as “Village 13”. The Project consists of a maximum of 1,938 residential units (1,881 single-family units and 57 multifamily units), 40,000 square feet of commercial uses, a 10.1-acre school site, 25.1 acres of public/private parks, a 6.1 acre homeowners’ association neighborhood facility, a 2.3- acre joint use site for fire station and sheriff storefront, 9.0 miles of multi-use community trails and pathways, 790.3 acres of preserve/open space land to be conveyed to Otay Ranch Resource Management Preserve, an additional 69.3 acres of biological open space, and 76.4 acres of internal open space.
  • Orange County Fire Authority AGENDA STAFF REPORT Board of Directors Meeting Agenda Item No

    Orange County Fire Authority AGENDA STAFF REPORT Board of Directors Meeting Agenda Item No

    ORANGE COUNTY FIRE AUTHORITY AGENDA BOARD OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING Thursday, April 26, 2018 6:00 P.M. Regional Fire Operations and Training Center Board Room 1 Fire Authority Road Irvine, CA 92602 This Agenda contains a brief general description of each item to be considered. Except as otherwise provided by law, no action or discussion shall be taken on any item not appearing on the following Agenda. Unless legally privileged, all supporting documents, including staff reports, and any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Board of Directors after the posting of this agenda are available for review at the Orange County Fire Authority Regional Fire Operations & Training Center, 1 Fire Authority Road, Irvine, CA 92602 or you may contact Sherry A.F. Wentz, Clerk of the Authority, at (714) 573-6040 Monday through Thursday, and every other Friday from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. and available online at http://www.ocfa.org If you wish to speak before the Fire Authority Board, please complete a Speaker Form identifying which item(s) you wish to address. Please return the completed form to the Clerk of the Authority prior to being heard before the Board. Speaker Forms are available at the counters of both entryways of the Board Room. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, you should contact the Clerk of the Authority at (714) 573-6040. CALL TO ORDER INVOCATION by OCFA Chaplain Duncan McColl PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE by Director Davies ROLL CALL 1.
  • Carbon Canyon Community Wildfire Protection Plan March 2017

    Carbon Canyon Community Wildfire Protection Plan March 2017

    CARBON CANYON COMMUNITY WILDFIRE PROTECTION PLAN MARCH 2017 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK Table of Contents SECTION I - INTRODUCTION AND COMMUNITY OVERVIEW ...........................................1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................1 Community Location ...........................................................................................................1 Demographics ......................................................................................................................2 Project Area Plant Communities and Habitat ......................................................................2 Current Condition of Project Area Habitat ..........................................................................4 Project Area Topography .....................................................................................................5 Project Area Weather ...........................................................................................................6 Project Are Fire History .......................................................................................................6 SECTION II - IDENTIFICATION OF COMMUNITY VALUES AT RISK ................................8 Local Preparedness and Firefighting Capability ..................................................................8 Assessing the Hazards and Values .......................................................................................8 Determining Hazard