Yukon Symbols Yukon Is One of Canada 'S Territories , and Has Established Several Territorial Symbols

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Yukon Symbols Yukon Is One of Canada 'S Territories , and Has Established Several Territorial Symbols Yukon symbols Yukon is one of Canada 's territories , and has established several territorial symbols. Like Nunavut , Yukon does not have an official Great Seal. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Retrieved Symbols of Canada by province or territory. Northwest Territories Nunavut Yukon. Categories : Territorial symbols of Yukon Provincial and territorial symbols of Canada Lists of provinces and territories of Canada Lists of symbols Yukon stubs Culture stubs. Hidden categories: All stub articles. Namespaces Article Talk. Views Read Edit View history. Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file. Download as PDF Printable version. Add links. Fireweed Epilobium angustifolium. Subalpine fir Abies lasiocarpa. The sap drawn from the blisters on its bark has been used by First Nation people as a traditional medicine for lung ailments. The colour and crystalline qualities of Yukon's lazulite are among the finest in the world. Woven cloth that is composed of green, dark blue, magenta, yellow and white stripes in varying widths on a light blue background. This article about Yukon is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. This culture -related article is a stub. It also is the least populated province or territory in Canada, with a population of 35, people as of the Census. Whitehorse , the territorial capital and Yukon's only city, is the largest settlement in any of the three territories. Yukon was split from the Northwest Territories in as the Yukon Territory. The federal government's Yukon Act , which received royal assent on March 27, , established Yukon as the territory's official name, [7] though Yukon Territory is also still popular in usage and Canada Post continues to use the territory's internationally approved postal abbreviation of YT. Most of Yukon has a subarctic climate , characterized by long, cold winters and brief, warm summers. The Arctic Ocean coast has a tundra climate. The territory is named after the Yukon River , the longest river in Yukon. The territory is the approximate shape of a right triangle , bordering the U. Its ragged eastern boundary mostly follows the divide between the Yukon Basin and the Mackenzie River drainage basin to the east in the Mackenzie mountains. Most of the territory is in the watershed of its namesake, the Yukon River. The southern Yukon is dotted with a large number of large, long and narrow glacier-fed alpine lakes, most of which flow into the Yukon River system. Other watersheds in the territory include the Mackenzie River, the Peel Watershed and the Alsek — Tatshenshini , and a number of rivers flowing directly into the Beaufort Sea. The two main Yukon rivers flowing into the Mackenzie in the Northwest Territories are the Liard River in the southeast and the Peel River and its tributaries in the northeast. Notable widespread tree species within Yukon are the black spruce and white spruce. Many trees are stunted because of the short growing season and severe climate. While the average winter temperature in Yukon is mild by Canadian arctic standards, no other place in North America gets as cold as Yukon during extreme cold snaps. Unlike most of Canada where the most extreme heat waves occur in July, August, and even September, Yukon's extreme heat tends to occur in June and even May. The first time was in June when Mayo recorded a temperature of The old record was finally broken 21 years later in June when the Mayo Road weather station, located just northwest of Whitehorse , recorded a temperature of Long before the arrival of Europeans, central and southern Yukon was populated by First Nations people, and the area escaped glaciation. Sites of archeological significance in Yukon hold some of the earliest evidence of the presence of human habitation in North America. Coastal and inland First Nations had extensive trading networks. European incursions into the area began early in the 19th century with the fur trade , followed by missionaries. By the s and s, gold miners began to arrive. This drove a population increase that justified the establishment of a police force, just in time for the start of the Klondike Gold Rush in The increased population coming with the gold rush led to the separation of the Yukon district from the Northwest Territories and the formation of the separate Yukon Territory in The census reported a Yukon population of 35,, an increase of 5. This is the largest percentage increase for any Canadian province or territory. According to the Canada Census the majority of the territory's population was of European descent, although it has a significant population of First Nations communities across the territory. The National Household Survey examined Yukon's ethnocultural diversity and immigration. At that time, The most common countries of birth for immigrants were the United Kingdom Among very recent immigrants between and living in Yukon, Visible minority and indigenous identity : [21] [22]. The top ten ancestries were: [23]. The Yukon Language Act "recognises the significance" of aboriginal languages in Yukon, although only English and French are available for laws, court proceedings, and legislative assembly proceedings. The National Household Survey reported that The most frequently reported religious affiliation was Christianity, reported by Of these, the most common denominations were the Catholic Church Yukon's major industry is mining lead, zinc , silver, gold, asbestos and copper. The government acquired the land from the Hudson's Bay Company in and split it from the Northwest Territories in to fill the need for local government created by the population influx of the gold rush. Thousands of these prospectors moved to the territory, ushering a period of Yukon history recorded by authors such as Robert W. Service and Jack London. The memory of this period and the early days of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police , as well as the territory's scenic wonders and outdoor recreation opportunities, makes tourism the second most important industry in the territory. Manufacturing, including furniture, clothing, and handicrafts, follows in importance, along with hydroelectricity. The traditional industries of trapping and fishing have declined. As of , the government sector directly employs approximately 6, out of a labour force of 20,, on a population of 27, On May 1, , Yukon modified its Business Corporations Act, [30] [31] [32] in an effort to attract more benefits and participants to its economy. One amendment to the BCA lets a proxy be given for voting purposes. Another change will allow directors to pursue business opportunities declined by the corporation, a practice off-limits in most other jurisdictions due to the inherent potential for conflicts of interest. Yukon's tourism motto is "Larger than life". These activities are offered both in an organized setting or in the backcountry , which is accessible by air or snowmobile. Yukon's latitude enables the view of aurora borealis. Yukon is also home to 12 National Historic Sites of Canada. The sites are also administered by Parks Canada , with five of the 12 sites being located within national parks. The territory also holds a number of enterprises that allows tourists to experience pre-colonial and modern cultures of Yukon's First Nations and Inuit peoples. As noted above, the "aboriginal identity population" makes up a substantial minority, accounting for about 26 percent. Notwithstanding, the aboriginal culture is strongly reflected in such areas as winter sports, as in the Yukon Quest sled dog race. The modern comic-book character Yukon Jack depicts a heroic aboriginal persona. Yukon also has a wide array of cultural and sporting events that attract artists, local residents, and tourists. By far the strongest cultural and tourism aspect of Yukon is the legacy of the Klondike Gold Rush — , which inspired such contemporary writers of the time as Jack London , Robert W. Yukon has numerous political parties and candidates who stand for election to the 19 seats in the Yukon Legislative Assembly. Those elected to the legislature are known as members of the Legislative Assembly and may use the post nominal letters "MLA". The three parties presently represented are the centre-leaning Yukon Liberal Party 11 seats — who currently form government, the centre-right leaning Yukon Party 6 , and the centre-left leaning Yukon New Democratic Party 2. Silver took office following the Yukon general election , where his Liberals won a majority government. For most individuals in Yukon, local level governance is provided by municipalities. Yukon's eight municipalities cover only 0. Municipal governments are created by the Government of Yukon in accordance with the Municipal Act of The remaining seven municipalities are towns, of which four were villages that were continued as towns upon adoption of the Municipal Act. In the 19th century, Yukon was a segment of North-Western Territory that was administered by the Hudson's Bay Company , and then of the Northwest Territories administered by the federal Canadian government. It only obtained a recognizable local government in when it became a separate district of the Northwest Territories. Prior to , the territory was administered by the commissioner who was appointed by the federal Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development. The commissioner had a role in appointing the territory's Executive Council , served as chair, and had a day-to-day role in governing the territory. The elected Territorial Council had a purely advisory role.
Recommended publications
  • Yukon College Student Survey Results
    Yukon College Student Survey Results 2014-15 Dawn Macdonald Institutional Research and Planning Officer December 24, 2014 Yukon College Student Survey Results: 2014-15 TABLE OF CONTENTS HIGHLIGHTS ...................................................................................................................................................... 3 PURPOSE AND METHODS ............................................................................................................................. 5 RESULTS .............................................................................................................................................................. 6 STUDENT SATISFACTION ............................................................................................................................................ 6 More than nine out of ten would recommend their program or courses .................................... 6 Nearly everyone is satisfied with the quality of instruction ............................................................. 7 More than nine out of ten are satisfied with course content ........................................................... 7 Nine out of ten are satisfied with support services ............................................................................. 8 Nine out of ten are satisfied with program advising and library resources ............................... 9 Satisfaction with spaces for group work lags behind satisfaction with social spaces and study spaces ...................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Geographic Patterns in Morphometric and Genetic Variation for Coyote Populations with Emphasis on Southeastern Coyotes
    Received: 19 March 2018 | Revised: 2 December 2018 | Accepted: 20 December 2018 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.4966 ORIGINAL RESEARCH Geographic patterns in morphometric and genetic variation for coyote populations with emphasis on southeastern coyotes Joseph W. Hinton1 | Elizabeth Heppenheimer2 | Kyla M. West3 | Danny Caudill4 | Melissa L. Karlin5 | John C. Kilgo6 | John Joseph Mayer7 | Karl V. Miller1 | Margaret Walch8 | Bridgett vonHoldt2 | Michael J. Chamberlain1 1Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, Abstract Georgia Prior to 1900, coyotes (Canis latrans) were restricted to the western and central re- 2 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary gions of North America, but by the early 2000s, coyotes became ubiquitous through- Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey out the eastern United States. Information regarding morphological and genetic 3Tacoma, Washington structure of coyote populations in the southeastern United States is limited, and 4 Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation where data exist, they are rarely compared to those from other regions of North Commission, Gainesville, Florida America. We assessed geographic patterns in morphology and genetics of coyotes 5Department of Physics and Environmental Sciences, St. Mary’s University, San Antonio, with special consideration of coyotes in the southeastern United States. Mean body Texas mass of coyote populations increased along a west‐to‐east gradient, with southeast- 6United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service Southern ern coyotes being intermediate to western and northeastern coyotes. Similarly, prin- Research Station, New Ellenton, South cipal component analysis of body mass and linear body measurements suggested Carolina that southeastern coyotes were intermediate to western and northeastern coyotes in 7United States Department of Energy, Environmental Sciences, and body size but exhibited shorter tails and ears from other populations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Alaska-Yukon Region of the Circumboreal Vegetation Map (CBVM)
    CAFF Strategy Series Report September 2015 The Alaska-Yukon Region of the Circumboreal Vegetation Map (CBVM) ARCTIC COUNCIL Acknowledgements CAFF Designated Agencies: • Norwegian Environment Agency, Trondheim, Norway • Environment Canada, Ottawa, Canada • Faroese Museum of Natural History, Tórshavn, Faroe Islands (Kingdom of Denmark) • Finnish Ministry of the Environment, Helsinki, Finland • Icelandic Institute of Natural History, Reykjavik, Iceland • Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Greenland • Russian Federation Ministry of Natural Resources, Moscow, Russia • Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Stockholm, Sweden • United States Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, Alaska CAFF Permanent Participant Organizations: • Aleut International Association (AIA) • Arctic Athabaskan Council (AAC) • Gwich’in Council International (GCI) • Inuit Circumpolar Council (ICC) • Russian Indigenous Peoples of the North (RAIPON) • Saami Council This publication should be cited as: Jorgensen, T. and D. Meidinger. 2015. The Alaska Yukon Region of the Circumboreal Vegetation map (CBVM). CAFF Strategies Series Report. Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna, Akureyri, Iceland. ISBN: 978- 9935-431-48-6 Cover photo: Photo: George Spade/Shutterstock.com Back cover: Photo: Doug Lemke/Shutterstock.com Design and layout: Courtney Price For more information please contact: CAFF International Secretariat Borgir, Nordurslod 600 Akureyri, Iceland Phone: +354 462-3350 Fax: +354 462-3390 Email: [email protected] Internet: www.caff.is CAFF Designated
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Coyote Assessment - 1999
    EASTERN COYOTE ASSESSMENT - 1999 By Walter J. Jakubas Mammal Group Leader Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife 650 State Street Bangor, Maine 04401 June 1999 EASTERN COYOTE ASSESSMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................4 NATURAL HISTORY.....................................................................................................5 Distribution and Taxonomy.................................................................................5 Food Habits ........................................................................................................6 Interactions with Other Species..........................................................................7 Reproduction ....................................................................................................10 Dispersal ..........................................................................................................11 Social Behavior.................................................................................................12 Mortality............................................................................................................13 MANAGEMENT ..........................................................................................................16 Regulatory Authority .........................................................................................16 Past Goals and Objectives ...............................................................................18
    [Show full text]
  • Taiga Plains
    ECOLOGICAL REGIONS OF THE NORTHWEST TERRITORIES Taiga Plains Ecosystem Classification Group Department of Environment and Natural Resources Government of the Northwest Territories Revised 2009 ECOLOGICAL REGIONS OF THE NORTHWEST TERRITORIES TAIGA PLAINS This report may be cited as: Ecosystem Classification Group. 2007 (rev. 2009). Ecological Regions of the Northwest Territories – Taiga Plains. Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Government of the Northwest Territories, Yellowknife, NT, Canada. viii + 173 pp. + folded insert map. ISBN 0-7708-0161-7 Web Site: http://www.enr.gov.nt.ca/index.html For more information contact: Department of Environment and Natural Resources P.O. Box 1320 Yellowknife, NT X1A 2L9 Phone: (867) 920-8064 Fax: (867) 873-0293 About the cover: The small photographs in the inset boxes are enlarged with captions on pages 22 (Taiga Plains High Subarctic (HS) Ecoregion), 52 (Taiga Plains Low Subarctic (LS) Ecoregion), 82 (Taiga Plains High Boreal (HB) Ecoregion), and 96 (Taiga Plains Mid-Boreal (MB) Ecoregion). Aerial photographs: Dave Downing (Timberline Natural Resource Group). Ground photographs and photograph of cloudberry: Bob Decker (Government of the Northwest Territories). Other plant photographs: Christian Bucher. Members of the Ecosystem Classification Group Dave Downing Ecologist, Timberline Natural Resource Group, Edmonton, Alberta. Bob Decker Forest Ecologist, Forest Management Division, Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Government of the Northwest Territories, Hay River, Northwest Territories. Bas Oosenbrug Habitat Conservation Biologist, Wildlife Division, Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Government of the Northwest Territories, Yellowknife, Northwest Territories. Charles Tarnocai Research Scientist, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, Ontario. Tom Chowns Environmental Consultant, Powassan, Ontario. Chris Hampel Geographic Information System Specialist/Resource Analyst, Timberline Natural Resource Group, Edmonton, Alberta.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 7: the Boreal Forest TEACHING
    TEACHING KIT Volume 7: The Boreal Forest National Forest Week 2006: September 24 to 30 The Canadian Forestry Association is pleased to announce that after careful consultation and consideration, in 2006 National Forest Week will move from spring to fall. Based on a 100-year legacy of facilitating forest education, the CFA believes this new approach will spur increased year-round learning opportunities for interested Canadians. Trends show that early education is key to capturing and fostering the interest of youth towards volunteerism, higher education and careers in the forest and environmental sectors. Developing the forestry leaders of tomorrow is critical to ensuring sustainability of our natural resources and the socio-economic and health benefits they provide for all Canadians. Integral to this learning process is the Canada's Forests Teaching Kit series, which has become the cornerstone of CFA’s education and outreach initiatives. Available free to educators, these kits provide tools for helping youth better understand the value of forest resources and the importance of using them wisely. Beginning in 2006, the annual kit publication date will change to coin- cide with National Forest Week each September. This is in response to overwhelming feedback from teachers across Canada indicating a strong preference to receive these materials at commencement of the school year for increased and enhanced integration into teaching plans and other outreach activities. In keeping with tradition, I invite you to join the CFA in celebrating Canada’s forests — in September and year-round: plant a tree, walk through a forest or learn about forest management. Your local forestry association can provide more ideas, teaching materials and information about forest activities in your area.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Ecosystems of West-Central Yukon
    Regional Ecosystems of West-Central Yukon PART 1: ECOSYSTEM DESCRIPTIONS March 2012 Prepared for Environment Yukon Prepared by Makonis Consulting Ltd. In association with S. Francis Consulting Inc. Site Planning + GIS John Meikle ISBN 978-1-55362-635-0 Copies of this report, including a digital version, are available at: c/o Ecological and Landscape Classification (ELC) Coordinator Environmental Planning Policy and Planning Branch Environment Yukon Box 2703, Whitehorse, Yukon Y1A 2C6 ph. (867) 667-3081 fax: (867) 393-6213 Visit the Yukon Ecological and Landscape Classification Program Website at www.env.gov.yk.ca/elc SUGGESTED CITATIONS Report Citation: “Grods, J., S.R. Francis, J.C. Meikle and S. Lapointe. 2012. Regional Ecosystems of West-Central Yukon, Part 1: Ecosystem descriptions. Report prepared for Environment, Government of Yukon by Makonis Consulting Ltd. and Associates, West Kelowna, BC.” Spatial Data Citation: “Grods, J., S.R. Francis, J.C. Meikle and S. Lapointe. 2012. West-central broad ecosystems (Version 1.1). Downloaded from Yukon government ftp site on XXX (replace XXX with date of download). Spatial data created for Environment, Government of Yukon by Makonis Consulting Ltd. and Associates, West Kelowna, BC.” DOCUMENT PREPARATION: The Ecosystems of West-central Yukon was produced by Makonis Consulting Ltd. and associates for Environment, Government of Yukon (the data Custodian). The project was managed by Nadele Flynn, Coordinator, Ecological and Landscape Classification (ELC) Program, Environmental Planning Branch, Government of Yukon. Although every effort has been made to ensure the correctness of the data in the Ecosystems of West-central Yukon report and spatial products, there still may be errors.
    [Show full text]
  • Yukon River Basin Study Project Report
    YUKON RIVER BASIN STUDY PROJECT REPORT: WILDLIFE NO. 1 FURBEARER INVENTORY, HABITAT ASSESSMENT AND TRAPPER UTILIZATION OF THE YUKON RIVER BASIN B.G. Slough and R.H. Jessup Wildlife Management Branch Yukon Department of Renewable Resources Box 2703 Whitehorse, Yukon Y1A 2C6 January 1984 i This report was funded by the Yukon River Basin Committee (jointly with Yukon Department of Renewable Resources) under the terms of "An Agreement Respecting Studies and Planning of Water Resources in the Yukon River Basin" between Canada, British Columbia and Yukon. The views, conclusions and recommendations are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Yukon River Basin Committee or the Government of Canada, British Columbia and Yukon. ii ABSTRACT The Yukon Department of Renewable Resources conducted furbearer inventory studies in the Canadian Yukon River Basin in 1982 and 1983. Field studies included beaver (Castor canadensis) food cache and colony site surveys, winter track-count sampling and muskrat (Ondatra zibethica) pushup surveys. Data from the surveys were analyzed in conjunction with ongoing trapper questionnaire and historical fur harvest data sources to characterize furbearer population distributions, levels, trends and habitats. Historical and present fur harvest and trapping activity are described. The fur resource capability and problems and issues associated with impacts on furbearer populations, habitats and user groups are discussed. The populations of wolves Canis lupus, red fox Vulpes fulva, coyote .Q..:.. latrans, red squirre 1 Tamiasciurus hudsonicus, wease 1 Mustela erminea, marten Martes americana, mink Mustela vison, otter Lutra canadensis, wolverine Gulo luscus, beaver, muskrat and lynx Lynx canadensis are all widely distributed within the Yukon River Basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Yakutat Tlingit and Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve: an Ethnographic Overview and Assessment
    Portland State University PDXScholar Anthropology Faculty Publications and Presentations Anthropology 2015 Yakutat Tlingit and Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve: An Ethnographic Overview and Assessment Douglas Deur Portland State University, [email protected] Thomas Thornton University of Oxford Rachel Lahoff Portland State University Jamie Hebert Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/anth_fac Part of the Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Citation Details Deur, Douglas; Thornton, Thomas; Lahoff, Rachel; and Hebert, Jamie, "Yakutat Tlingit and Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve: An Ethnographic Overview and Assessment" (2015). Anthropology Faculty Publications and Presentations. 99. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/anth_fac/99 This Report is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Anthropology Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve Yakutat Tlingit and Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve: An Ethnographic Overview and Assessment Douglas Deur, Ph.D. Thomas Thornton, Ph.D. Rachel Lahoff, M.A. Jamie Hebert, M.A. 2015 Cover photos: Mount St. Elias / Was'ei Tashaa (courtesy Wikimedia Commons); Mount St. Elias Dancers (courtesy Yakutat Tlingit Tribe / Bert Adams Sr.) Yakutat Tlingit and Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve: An Ethnographic Overview and Assessment 2015 Douglas Deur, Thomas Thornton, Rachel Lahoff, and Jamie Hebert Portland State University Department of Anthropology United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Wrangell-St.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental and Cultural Overview of the Yukon Flats Region Prepared By: Kevin Bailey, USFWS Archaeologist Date: 2/12/2015 In
    Environmental and Cultural Overview of the Yukon Flats Region Prepared by: Kevin Bailey, USFWS Archaeologist Date: 2/12/2015 Introduction With a substantial population of Native people residing in their traditional homeland and living a modern traditional lifestyle, the Yukon Flats Refuge and all of the Alaskan Interior is a dynamic and living cultural landscape. The land, people, and wildlife form a tight, interrelated web of relationships extending thousands of years into the past. Natural features and human created “sites” form a landscape of meaning to the modern residents. The places and their meanings are highly relevant to modern residents, not just for people and culture but for the land. To many Gwich’in people culture is not distinct from their homeland. Although only minimally discussed in this overview, this dynamic living cultural landscape should be considered and discussed when writing about this area. Environmental Setting Containing the largest interior basin in Alaska, the Yukon Flats Refuge encompasses over 11 million acres of land in east central Alaska. Extending roughly 220 miles east-west along the Arctic Circle, the refuge lies between the Brooks Range to the north, and the White-Crazy Mountains to the south. The pipeline corridor runs along the refuge’s western boundary while the eastern boundary extends within 30 miles of the Canadian border. The Yukon River bisects the refuge, creating the dominant terrain. As many as 40,000 lakes, ponds, and streams may occur on the refuge, most concentrated in the flood plain along the Yukon and other rivers. Upland terrain, where lakes are less abundant, is the source of important drainage systems.
    [Show full text]
  • A, Index Map of the St. Elias Mountains of Alaska and Canada Showing the Glacierized Areas (Index Map Modi- Fied from Field, 1975A)
    Figure 100.—A, Index map of the St. Elias Mountains of Alaska and Canada showing the glacierized areas (index map modi- fied from Field, 1975a). B, Enlargement of NOAA Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) image mosaic of the St. Elias Mountains in summer 1995. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration image from Mike Fleming, USGS, EROS Data Center, Alaska Science Center, Anchorage, Alaska. K122 SATELLITE IMAGE ATLAS OF GLACIERS OF THE WORLD St. Elias Mountains Introduction Much of the St. Elias Mountains, a 750×180-km mountain system, strad- dles the Alaskan-Canadian border, paralleling the coastline of the northern Gulf of Alaska; about two-thirds of the mountain system is located within Alaska (figs. 1, 100). In both Alaska and Canada, this complex system of mountain ranges along their common border is sometimes referred to as the Icefield Ranges. In Canada, the Icefield Ranges extend from the Province of British Columbia into the Yukon Territory. The Alaskan St. Elias Mountains extend northwest from Lynn Canal, Chilkat Inlet, and Chilkat River on the east; to Cross Sound and Icy Strait on the southeast; to the divide between Waxell Ridge and Barkley Ridge and the western end of the Robinson Moun- tains on the southwest; to Juniper Island, the central Bagley Icefield, the eastern wall of the valley of Tana Glacier, and Tana River on the west; and to Chitistone River and White River on the north and northwest. The boundar- ies presented here are different from Orth’s (1967) description. Several of Orth’s descriptions of the limits of adjacent features and the descriptions of the St.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Snowmobile Trails on Coyote Movements Within Lynx Home Ranges
    Research Article The Effect of Snowmobile Trails on Coyote Movements Within Lynx Home Ranges JAY A. KOLBE,1 Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Parks, Seeley Lake, MT 59868, USA JOHN R. SQUIRES, United States Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Box 8089, Missoula, MT 59807, USA DANIEL H. PLETSCHER, Wildlife Biology Program, Department of Ecosystem and Conservation Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812, USA LEONARD F. RUGGIERO, United States Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Box 8089, Missoula, MT 59807, USA ABSTRACT Coyotes (Canis latrans) and Canada lynx (Lynx canadensis) are sympatric throughout much of the lynx’s southern range. Researchers and managers have suggested that the presence of compacted snowmobile trails may allow coyotes to access lynx habitat from which they were previously excluded by deep, unconsolidated snow. This could then allow coyotes to more effectively compete with lynx for snowshoe hares (Lepus americanus), the lynx’s primary prey. We investigated how coyotes interacted with compacted snowmobile trails by conducting carnivore track surveys and by snow tracking adult coyotes (4 M, 8 F) in areas of western Montana, USA, with both documented lynx presence and recreational snowmobile use. Coyotes remained in lynx habitat having deep snow throughout the winter months. They used compacted snowmobile trails for 7.69% of their travel distance and traveled on them for a median distance of 124 m. Coyotes used compacted forest roads (5.66% of total travel) and uncompacted forest roads (4.62% of total travel) similarly. Coyotes did not travel closer to compacted snowmobile trails than random expectation (coyote x¯ distance from compacted trails ¼ 368 m, random expectation ¼ 339 m) and the distance they traveled from these trails did not vary with daily, monthly, or yearly changes in snow supportiveness or depth.
    [Show full text]