DOCSLIB.ORG

Regional Assessment of Wildlife in the Yukon Southern Lakes Area

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Regional Assessment of Wildlife in the Yukon Southern Lakes Area Regional Assessment of Wildlife in the Yukon Southern Lakes Area Volume 2: Species Status Assessment Southern Lakes Wildlife Coordinating Committee Regional Assessment of Wildlife in the Yukon Southern Lakes Area Volume 2: Species Status Assessment Prepared by: Southern Lakes Wildlife Coordinating Committee Regional Assessment of Wildlife in the Yukon Southern Lakes Area Volume 2: Species Status Assessment Acknowledgements The Regional Assessment of Wildlife in the Southern Lakes Area was developed by the Southern Lakes Wildlife Coordinating Committee (Appendix A, Volume 1). The committee acknowledges the support of Michelle Sicotte, Shawn Taylor, Tami Hamilton, and Joella Hogan. Volume 1 was drafted primarily by Brian Pelchat and Thomas Jung, with contributions and reviews by committee members, Michelle Sicotte, Tami Hamilton, Heather Clarke, and Shawn Taylor. Adam Roth provided the maps. Status assessments for Volume 2 were compiled by Rosa Brown, Frank Doyle, Rob Florkiewicz, Jim Hawkings, Michelle Henley, Scott Herron, Manfred Hoefs, Maria Leung, Wendy Nixon, Graham Pelchat, Ben Schonewille, Dave Sembsmoen, Mike Setterington, Michelle Sicotte, Pam Sinclair, Brian Slough, and Shawn Taylor. Committee members and staff from the governments reviewed drafts. Michelle Sicotte and Teresa Earle compiled the document. Several committee meetings were facilitated by Lindsay Staples, Norm McLean, Doug Clarke, Kelly Milner, and Betsy Jackson. Nancy Campbell and Dennis Senger provided communications support. Teresa Earle edited the documents. Staff members from the governments shared technical information, provided feedback on the assessment, participated in meetings, and assisted with logistics. The committee would like to thank the people from the Southern Lakes area who attended meetings and participated in the development of the regional wildlife assessment. In particular, Elders respectfully passed on traditional knowledge on the wildlife of the region, and guidance on how the area should be managed. Disclaimer This report describes the results of work by the Southern Lakes Wildlife Coordinating Committee. The Southern Lakes Wildlife Coordinating Committee recommendations shall not create any commitments or obligations that are legally binding or create or affect any legal rights of the Parties. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing these recommendations shall not create, affect, define or interpret any roles, responsibilities, rights, or interests under the First Nation Final or Self-Government Agreements. Copies available from: Yukon Department of Environment Fish and Wildlife Branch, V-5A Box 2703, Whitehorse, Yukon Y1A 2C6 Phone (867) 667-5721, Fax (867) 393-6263 E-mail: [email protected] Also available online at www.southernlakeswildlife.ca Cover photos by Government of Yukon (caribou, swans) and Mark Connor (wood frog) Suggested citation: Southern Lakes Wildlife Coordinating Committee. 2012. Regional Assessment of Wildlife in the Yukon Southern Lakes Region: Volume 2: Species Status Assessment. Environment Yukon, Whitehorse, Yukon 168 pp. Table of Contents Acknowledgements......................................................................... Inside Cover Disclaimer................................................................................... Inside Cover Table of Contents ............................................................................................. i List of Tables................................................................................................... v List of Figures ................................................................................................ vi Summary........................................................................................................ 1 The Regional Wildlife Assessment.................................................................... 2 Scope........................................................................................................... 2 Organization ................................................................................................ 3 Audiences .................................................................................................... 4 Ungulates ....................................................................................................... 4 Introduction................................................................................................. 4 Species Assessments.................................................................................... 7 Stressors and Threats .................................................................................. 8 Education and Outreach ............................................................................ 12 Bison ............................................................................................................ 13 Species Significance ................................................................................... 13 Distribution and Abundance ...................................................................... 13 Harvest Trends........................................................................................... 15 Key Habitats .............................................................................................. 16 Species Management.................................................................................. 16 Caribou......................................................................................................... 17 Species Significance ................................................................................... 17 Distribution and Abundance ...................................................................... 17 Harvest Trends........................................................................................... 21 Key Habitats .............................................................................................. 21 Species Management.................................................................................. 22 Deer.............................................................................................................. 22 Species Significance ................................................................................... 22 Distribution and Abundance ...................................................................... 22 Harvest Trends........................................................................................... 24 Key Habitats .............................................................................................. 24 Species Management.................................................................................. 24 Elk................................................................................................................ 25 Species Significance ................................................................................... 25 Distribution and Abundance ...................................................................... 25 Harvest Trends........................................................................................... 27 Key Habitats .............................................................................................. 28 Species Management.................................................................................. 28 Goats............................................................................................................ 29 Species Significance ................................................................................... 29 Distribution and Abundance ...................................................................... 30 Harvest Trends........................................................................................... 31 Key Habitats .............................................................................................. 31 Regional Assessment of Wildlife in the Yukon Southern Lakes Area i Volume 2: Species Status Assessment Species Management.................................................................................. 31 Moose ........................................................................................................... 31 Species Significance ................................................................................... 31 Distribution and Abundance ...................................................................... 32 Harvest Trends........................................................................................... 35 Key Habitats .............................................................................................. 36 Species Management.................................................................................. 37 Sheep ........................................................................................................... 38 Species Significance ................................................................................... 38 Distribution and Abundance ...................................................................... 38 Harvest Trends........................................................................................... 39 Key Habitats .............................................................................................. 39 Species Management.................................................................................. 40 Large Carnivores........................................................................................... 40 Introduction..............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Yukon College Student Survey Results
    Yukon College Student Survey Results 2014-15 Dawn Macdonald Institutional Research and Planning Officer December 24, 2014 Yukon College Student Survey Results: 2014-15 TABLE OF CONTENTS HIGHLIGHTS ...................................................................................................................................................... 3 PURPOSE AND METHODS ............................................................................................................................. 5 RESULTS .............................................................................................................................................................. 6 STUDENT SATISFACTION ............................................................................................................................................ 6 More than nine out of ten would recommend their program or courses .................................... 6 Nearly everyone is satisfied with the quality of instruction ............................................................. 7 More than nine out of ten are satisfied with course content ........................................................... 7 Nine out of ten are satisfied with support services ............................................................................. 8 Nine out of ten are satisfied with program advising and library resources ............................... 9 Satisfaction with spaces for group work lags behind satisfaction with social spaces and study spaces ...................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Geographic Patterns in Morphometric and Genetic Variation for Coyote Populations with Emphasis on Southeastern Coyotes
    Received: 19 March 2018 | Revised: 2 December 2018 | Accepted: 20 December 2018 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.4966 ORIGINAL RESEARCH Geographic patterns in morphometric and genetic variation for coyote populations with emphasis on southeastern coyotes Joseph W. Hinton1 | Elizabeth Heppenheimer2 | Kyla M. West3 | Danny Caudill4 | Melissa L. Karlin5 | John C. Kilgo6 | John Joseph Mayer7 | Karl V. Miller1 | Margaret Walch8 | Bridgett vonHoldt2 | Michael J. Chamberlain1 1Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, Abstract Georgia Prior to 1900, coyotes (Canis latrans) were restricted to the western and central re- 2 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary gions of North America, but by the early 2000s, coyotes became ubiquitous through- Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey out the eastern United States. Information regarding morphological and genetic 3Tacoma, Washington structure of coyote populations in the southeastern United States is limited, and 4 Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation where data exist, they are rarely compared to those from other regions of North Commission, Gainesville, Florida America. We assessed geographic patterns in morphology and genetics of coyotes 5Department of Physics and Environmental Sciences, St. Mary’s University, San Antonio, with special consideration of coyotes in the southeastern United States. Mean body Texas mass of coyote populations increased along a west‐to‐east gradient, with southeast- 6United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service Southern ern coyotes being intermediate to western and northeastern coyotes. Similarly, prin- Research Station, New Ellenton, South cipal component analysis of body mass and linear body measurements suggested Carolina that southeastern coyotes were intermediate to western and northeastern coyotes in 7United States Department of Energy, Environmental Sciences, and body size but exhibited shorter tails and ears from other populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report Commissioner
    ANNUAL REPORT o[the COMMISSIONER of the Yukon Territory APRIL 1st, 1967 to MARCH 31st, 1968 ANNUAL REPORT of the COMMISSIONER of the Yukon Territory APRIL 1st, 1967 to MARCH 31st, 1968 --------------------ANN U A L REP 0 R T 0 f the..... ----------------------- CONi l"i I S S ION E R 0 f the ------------------------------YUKON TERRITORY ----------------------------------------April 1st, 1967 to March 31st, 1966 r N D E X Page Number COMMISSIONER 1 TERRI T ORIAL COUNCIL 1 DEPARTMENTS OF THE TERRITORIAL GOVERN MENT TERRITORIAL SECRETARY & REGISTRAR GENERAL 2 ENGINEERING & MUNICIPAL AFFAIRS 5 GAME 12 LIQUOR CONTROL 16 TERRITORIAL TREASURER & COLLECTOR OF TAXES 17 TRAVEL & PUBLICITY 18 YUKON HOSPITAL INSURANCE SERVICES 20 YUKON REGIONAL UBRARY 20 CORRECTIONS 23 EDUCATION 30 SOCIAL WELFARE 35 PERSONNEL 45 CENTRAL REGISTRY 45 RECREATION 46 EMPLOYMENT IN THE YUKON 44 CIVIL EMERGENCY PIANNING 46 PUBUC HEALTH 47 RESOURCES MINING 49 TOTE TRAIL ASSISTANCE 51 PROSPECTORS 'ASSISTANCE 51 lANDS 52 ADMINISTRATION 54 1. COMMISSIONER The Commissioner is chief executive officer for the Yukon Tenitory. He is appointed by the Governor-in-Council and acts under instdlctions given to him by the Governor-in-Council or by the Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development. The present Commissioner, Mr. J. Smith, was apPointed on November 7, 1966. TERRITORIAL C OUNC IL The Yukon Act provid es for a Legislative Council of the Yukon Territory to be composed of seven members elected for a term of three years. An election wa s held on September 11, 1967 and the Council now consists of the following: }.O. IJvesey (Speaker) Carmacks-Kluane D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Alaska-Yukon Region of the Circumboreal Vegetation Map (CBVM)
    CAFF Strategy Series Report September 2015 The Alaska-Yukon Region of the Circumboreal Vegetation Map (CBVM) ARCTIC COUNCIL Acknowledgements CAFF Designated Agencies: • Norwegian Environment Agency, Trondheim, Norway • Environment Canada, Ottawa, Canada • Faroese Museum of Natural History, Tórshavn, Faroe Islands (Kingdom of Denmark) • Finnish Ministry of the Environment, Helsinki, Finland • Icelandic Institute of Natural History, Reykjavik, Iceland • Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Greenland • Russian Federation Ministry of Natural Resources, Moscow, Russia • Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Stockholm, Sweden • United States Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, Alaska CAFF Permanent Participant Organizations: • Aleut International Association (AIA) • Arctic Athabaskan Council (AAC) • Gwich’in Council International (GCI) • Inuit Circumpolar Council (ICC) • Russian Indigenous Peoples of the North (RAIPON) • Saami Council This publication should be cited as: Jorgensen, T. and D. Meidinger. 2015. The Alaska Yukon Region of the Circumboreal Vegetation map (CBVM). CAFF Strategies Series Report. Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna, Akureyri, Iceland. ISBN: 978- 9935-431-48-6 Cover photo: Photo: George Spade/Shutterstock.com Back cover: Photo: Doug Lemke/Shutterstock.com Design and layout: Courtney Price For more information please contact: CAFF International Secretariat Borgir, Nordurslod 600 Akureyri, Iceland Phone: +354 462-3350 Fax: +354 462-3390 Email: [email protected] Internet: www.caff.is CAFF Designated
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Coyote Assessment - 1999
    EASTERN COYOTE ASSESSMENT - 1999 By Walter J. Jakubas Mammal Group Leader Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife 650 State Street Bangor, Maine 04401 June 1999 EASTERN COYOTE ASSESSMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................4 NATURAL HISTORY.....................................................................................................5 Distribution and Taxonomy.................................................................................5 Food Habits ........................................................................................................6 Interactions with Other Species..........................................................................7 Reproduction ....................................................................................................10 Dispersal ..........................................................................................................11 Social Behavior.................................................................................................12 Mortality............................................................................................................13 MANAGEMENT ..........................................................................................................16 Regulatory Authority .........................................................................................16 Past Goals and Objectives ...............................................................................18
    [Show full text]
  • Taiga Plains
    ECOLOGICAL REGIONS OF THE NORTHWEST TERRITORIES Taiga Plains Ecosystem Classification Group Department of Environment and Natural Resources Government of the Northwest Territories Revised 2009 ECOLOGICAL REGIONS OF THE NORTHWEST TERRITORIES TAIGA PLAINS This report may be cited as: Ecosystem Classification Group. 2007 (rev. 2009). Ecological Regions of the Northwest Territories – Taiga Plains. Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Government of the Northwest Territories, Yellowknife, NT, Canada. viii + 173 pp. + folded insert map. ISBN 0-7708-0161-7 Web Site: http://www.enr.gov.nt.ca/index.html For more information contact: Department of Environment and Natural Resources P.O. Box 1320 Yellowknife, NT X1A 2L9 Phone: (867) 920-8064 Fax: (867) 873-0293 About the cover: The small photographs in the inset boxes are enlarged with captions on pages 22 (Taiga Plains High Subarctic (HS) Ecoregion), 52 (Taiga Plains Low Subarctic (LS) Ecoregion), 82 (Taiga Plains High Boreal (HB) Ecoregion), and 96 (Taiga Plains Mid-Boreal (MB) Ecoregion). Aerial photographs: Dave Downing (Timberline Natural Resource Group). Ground photographs and photograph of cloudberry: Bob Decker (Government of the Northwest Territories). Other plant photographs: Christian Bucher. Members of the Ecosystem Classification Group Dave Downing Ecologist, Timberline Natural Resource Group, Edmonton, Alberta. Bob Decker Forest Ecologist, Forest Management Division, Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Government of the Northwest Territories, Hay River, Northwest Territories. Bas Oosenbrug Habitat Conservation Biologist, Wildlife Division, Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Government of the Northwest Territories, Yellowknife, Northwest Territories. Charles Tarnocai Research Scientist, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, Ontario. Tom Chowns Environmental Consultant, Powassan, Ontario. Chris Hampel Geographic Information System Specialist/Resource Analyst, Timberline Natural Resource Group, Edmonton, Alberta.
    [Show full text]
  • Elected Members 1900-2006
    Yukon Legislative Assembly Office ____________________________________________________________________________ Box 2703 (A-9), Whitehorse, Yukon Y1A 2C6 Telephone (867) 667-5498 Fax (867) 393-6280 •Email [email protected] Members Elected to the Yukon Territorial Council or the Yukon Legislative Assembly 1900-2016 (as of November 30, 2019) Section 5 of An Act to Provide for the Government of the Yukon District (The Yukon Territory Act) (1898) created a council of not more than six persons to aid the Commissioner of the Yukon Territory in the administration of the territory. This council was to be entirely composed of persons appointed by the Governor in Council. In 1899 the Parliament of Canada amended the Act to increase the size of the council by adding two elected members to it. A further amendment in 1902 added three more elected members to the council. In 1908 the Act was again amended to provide for an entirely elected council of 10 members. Prior to the 1978 general election, Members were elected to the territorial council or legislative assembly as independent members. Some, however, had known federal political affiliations. That is what is noted in the ‘Party’ column for those members elected prior to 1978. Members elected prior to the establishment of the 1st Wholly-Elective Territorial Council of the Yukon Territory Member elected Electoral Party Term(s) in office Service District in days 1. George Black Klondike Conservative – Yukon Independent April 12, 1905 – June 27, 1909 1537 Party 2. Joseph Andrew Dawson Citizens’ Yukon Party January 13, 1903-April 11, 820 Clarke 1905 3. John Gillespie Bonanza Conservative April 12, 1905 – April 15, 1907 733 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 7: the Boreal Forest TEACHING
    TEACHING KIT Volume 7: The Boreal Forest National Forest Week 2006: September 24 to 30 The Canadian Forestry Association is pleased to announce that after careful consultation and consideration, in 2006 National Forest Week will move from spring to fall. Based on a 100-year legacy of facilitating forest education, the CFA believes this new approach will spur increased year-round learning opportunities for interested Canadians. Trends show that early education is key to capturing and fostering the interest of youth towards volunteerism, higher education and careers in the forest and environmental sectors. Developing the forestry leaders of tomorrow is critical to ensuring sustainability of our natural resources and the socio-economic and health benefits they provide for all Canadians. Integral to this learning process is the Canada's Forests Teaching Kit series, which has become the cornerstone of CFA’s education and outreach initiatives. Available free to educators, these kits provide tools for helping youth better understand the value of forest resources and the importance of using them wisely. Beginning in 2006, the annual kit publication date will change to coin- cide with National Forest Week each September. This is in response to overwhelming feedback from teachers across Canada indicating a strong preference to receive these materials at commencement of the school year for increased and enhanced integration into teaching plans and other outreach activities. In keeping with tradition, I invite you to join the CFA in celebrating Canada’s forests — in September and year-round: plant a tree, walk through a forest or learn about forest management. Your local forestry association can provide more ideas, teaching materials and information about forest activities in your area.
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory to Posters, Original Art and Miscellaneous Items
    Inventory to POSTERS, ORIGINAL ART & MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS Held at the Yukon Archives January 1997 Libraries and Archives Inventory to POSTERS, ORIGINAL ART & MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS Held at the Yukon Archives January 1997 Yukon Archives Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data Yukon Archives Inventory to posters, original art & miscellaneous items held at the Yukon Archives Issued by Yukon Archives. ISBN 1-55018-779-1 Includes an index. 1. Posters -- Yukon Territory -- Catalogs. 2. Art -- Yukon Territory -- Catalogs. 3. Collectibles -- Yukon Territory -- Catalogs. 4. Yukon Archives -- Catalogs. I. Yukon Territory. Yukon Education. II. Title. CD3645.Y8I68 1997 016.741.6'74 C97-980334-9 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................1-1 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS ....................................................................................................................2-1 ORIGINAL ART .................................................................................................................................3-1 POSTERS .........................................................................................................................................4-1 TITLE INDEX ....................................................................................................................................5-1 SUBJECT INDEX ................................................................................................................................6-1
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Ecosystems of West-Central Yukon
    Regional Ecosystems of West-Central Yukon PART 1: ECOSYSTEM DESCRIPTIONS March 2012 Prepared for Environment Yukon Prepared by Makonis Consulting Ltd. In association with S. Francis Consulting Inc. Site Planning + GIS John Meikle ISBN 978-1-55362-635-0 Copies of this report, including a digital version, are available at: c/o Ecological and Landscape Classification (ELC) Coordinator Environmental Planning Policy and Planning Branch Environment Yukon Box 2703, Whitehorse, Yukon Y1A 2C6 ph. (867) 667-3081 fax: (867) 393-6213 Visit the Yukon Ecological and Landscape Classification Program Website at www.env.gov.yk.ca/elc SUGGESTED CITATIONS Report Citation: “Grods, J., S.R. Francis, J.C. Meikle and S. Lapointe. 2012. Regional Ecosystems of West-Central Yukon, Part 1: Ecosystem descriptions. Report prepared for Environment, Government of Yukon by Makonis Consulting Ltd. and Associates, West Kelowna, BC.” Spatial Data Citation: “Grods, J., S.R. Francis, J.C. Meikle and S. Lapointe. 2012. West-central broad ecosystems (Version 1.1). Downloaded from Yukon government ftp site on XXX (replace XXX with date of download). Spatial data created for Environment, Government of Yukon by Makonis Consulting Ltd. and Associates, West Kelowna, BC.” DOCUMENT PREPARATION: The Ecosystems of West-central Yukon was produced by Makonis Consulting Ltd. and associates for Environment, Government of Yukon (the data Custodian). The project was managed by Nadele Flynn, Coordinator, Ecological and Landscape Classification (ELC) Program, Environmental Planning Branch, Government of Yukon. Although every effort has been made to ensure the correctness of the data in the Ecosystems of West-central Yukon report and spatial products, there still may be errors.
    [Show full text]
  • Yukon River Basin Study Project Report
    YUKON RIVER BASIN STUDY PROJECT REPORT: WILDLIFE NO. 1 FURBEARER INVENTORY, HABITAT ASSESSMENT AND TRAPPER UTILIZATION OF THE YUKON RIVER BASIN B.G. Slough and R.H. Jessup Wildlife Management Branch Yukon Department of Renewable Resources Box 2703 Whitehorse, Yukon Y1A 2C6 January 1984 i This report was funded by the Yukon River Basin Committee (jointly with Yukon Department of Renewable Resources) under the terms of "An Agreement Respecting Studies and Planning of Water Resources in the Yukon River Basin" between Canada, British Columbia and Yukon. The views, conclusions and recommendations are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Yukon River Basin Committee or the Government of Canada, British Columbia and Yukon. ii ABSTRACT The Yukon Department of Renewable Resources conducted furbearer inventory studies in the Canadian Yukon River Basin in 1982 and 1983. Field studies included beaver (Castor canadensis) food cache and colony site surveys, winter track-count sampling and muskrat (Ondatra zibethica) pushup surveys. Data from the surveys were analyzed in conjunction with ongoing trapper questionnaire and historical fur harvest data sources to characterize furbearer population distributions, levels, trends and habitats. Historical and present fur harvest and trapping activity are described. The fur resource capability and problems and issues associated with impacts on furbearer populations, habitats and user groups are discussed. The populations of wolves Canis lupus, red fox Vulpes fulva, coyote .Q..:.. latrans, red squirre 1 Tamiasciurus hudsonicus, wease 1 Mustela erminea, marten Martes americana, mink Mustela vison, otter Lutra canadensis, wolverine Gulo luscus, beaver, muskrat and lynx Lynx canadensis are all widely distributed within the Yukon River Basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Yakutat Tlingit and Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve: an Ethnographic Overview and Assessment
    Portland State University PDXScholar Anthropology Faculty Publications and Presentations Anthropology 2015 Yakutat Tlingit and Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve: An Ethnographic Overview and Assessment Douglas Deur Portland State University, [email protected] Thomas Thornton University of Oxford Rachel Lahoff Portland State University Jamie Hebert Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/anth_fac Part of the Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Citation Details Deur, Douglas; Thornton, Thomas; Lahoff, Rachel; and Hebert, Jamie, "Yakutat Tlingit and Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve: An Ethnographic Overview and Assessment" (2015). Anthropology Faculty Publications and Presentations. 99. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/anth_fac/99 This Report is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Anthropology Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve Yakutat Tlingit and Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve: An Ethnographic Overview and Assessment Douglas Deur, Ph.D. Thomas Thornton, Ph.D. Rachel Lahoff, M.A. Jamie Hebert, M.A. 2015 Cover photos: Mount St. Elias / Was'ei Tashaa (courtesy Wikimedia Commons); Mount St. Elias Dancers (courtesy Yakutat Tlingit Tribe / Bert Adams Sr.) Yakutat Tlingit and Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve: An Ethnographic Overview and Assessment 2015 Douglas Deur, Thomas Thornton, Rachel Lahoff, and Jamie Hebert Portland State University Department of Anthropology United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Wrangell-St.
    [Show full text]