DOCSLIB.ORG

Yakutat Tlingit and Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve: an Ethnographic Overview and Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Yakutat Tlingit and Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve: an Ethnographic Overview and Assessment Portland State University PDXScholar Anthropology Faculty Publications and Presentations Anthropology 2015 Yakutat Tlingit and Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve: An Ethnographic Overview and Assessment Douglas Deur Portland State University, [email protected] Thomas Thornton University of Oxford Rachel Lahoff Portland State University Jamie Hebert Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/anth_fac Part of the Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Citation Details Deur, Douglas; Thornton, Thomas; Lahoff, Rachel; and Hebert, Jamie, "Yakutat Tlingit and Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve: An Ethnographic Overview and Assessment" (2015). Anthropology Faculty Publications and Presentations. 99. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/anth_fac/99 This Report is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Anthropology Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve Yakutat Tlingit and Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve: An Ethnographic Overview and Assessment Douglas Deur, Ph.D. Thomas Thornton, Ph.D. Rachel Lahoff, M.A. Jamie Hebert, M.A. 2015 Cover photos: Mount St. Elias / Was'ei Tashaa (courtesy Wikimedia Commons); Mount St. Elias Dancers (courtesy Yakutat Tlingit Tribe / Bert Adams Sr.) Yakutat Tlingit and Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve: An Ethnographic Overview and Assessment 2015 Douglas Deur, Thomas Thornton, Rachel Lahoff, and Jamie Hebert Portland State University Department of Anthropology United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve PO Box 439/Mile 106.8 Richardson Highway Copper Center AK 99573 www.nps.gov/wrst Title page photo: Mount St. Elias Dancers (courtesy Yakutat Tlingit Tribe / Bert Adams Sr.) This research was completed under a Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit Task Agreement (No. J8W07100006) between the National Park Service, Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve and Portland State University, under Cooperative Agreement H8W07060001. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Methods 8 Foundations 16 Yakutat Tlingit and Wrangell-St. Elias: An Introduction 17 Movements of Clans and Cultures into the Yakutat Region 23 Migration Narratives of Yakutat Clans 26 The Migration of the Galyáx-Kaagwaantaan Clan 27 The Migration of the Kwáashk’ikwáan Clan 30 Yakutat Tlingit Clan Organization 40 The Yaakwdáat Kwáan and Their Lands 48 Natural Resources and Traditional Harvests on the South Coast of Wrangell-St. Elias 62 Marine Mammals 68 Fish and Shellfish 78 Eyak Fishing Traditions 83 Terrestrial Animals 84 Birds and Bird Eggs 88 Plant Foods 90 Minerals, Rocks and Shells 93 Traditional Yakutat Tlingit Stewardship of Natural Resources 96 Transitions 99 European Exploration and the “Rediscovery” of Yakutat 100 The Russian Occupation of Yakutat 109 The American Reoccupation 118 Yakutat Tlingit Responses and Early Revivals 125 World War II and the Emergence of Modern Yakutat 130 On the Eve of Park Creation: Yakutat Tlingit Uses of Wrangell-St. Elias from World War II to ANILCA 135 Seals and Sealing 136 New Responses to the Challenges of Sealing in Icy Waters 138 Fishing the Coastline of Wrangell-St. Elias in the Postwar Period 148 Commercial and Surf Fishing 151 Camps and Commercial Fishing: In the 1950s, 1960s, and 1970s 153 Mountain Goat and Other Terrestrial Animals 156 Moose and Deer in the Yakutat Territory: 1930s-1970s 157 Birds and Bird Eggs 159 Plant Gathering 161 New Pressures 163 Yakutat Tlingit and Wrangell-St. Elias: An Ethnographic Overview and Assessment iii Modern Connections 166 Enduring Traditions of Resource Use in and around Wrangell-St. Elias 167 Persisting Resource Traditions 175 Seal and Sea Otter Hunting 179 Land Hunting 181 Fish and Shellfish 184 Seagull Eggs 186 Plant Gathering 187 Traditional Yakutat Tlingit Stewardship of Natural Resources 189 Modern Communities: The Yakutat Tlingit Tribe, Yak-Tat Kwaan, and Yakutat, Alaska 192 Modern Connections: Enduring Connections and Hopes for the Future 200 Park-Tribe Relationships 207 Looking Toward the Future 211 Toward a Collaborative Future: Conclusions and Recommendations 216 Wrangell-St. Elias Visitors and Management Respecting the Landscape 225 Meaningful Acknowledgement of Yakutat Tlingit Linkages to the Land 225 A Voice as “Host” 226 Educational, Economic and Employment Opportunities 227 Maintaining Connections with the Land 228 Sources 232 Notes 233 Bibliography 300 Appendix A: Annotated Bibliography Separate volume iv Yakutat Tlingit and Wrangell-St. Elias: An Ethnographic Overview and Assessment MAPS, TABLES, and FIGURES Map 1: Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve 7 Map 2: Level III Ecoregions: Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve 18 Map 3: Tlingit and Eyak Traditional Territories 24 Map 4: Approximate Migration Routes of the Kwáashk’ikwáan & Galyáx- Kaagwaantaan 28 Map 5: Placenames in and near Wrangell-St. Elias 31 Map 6: Clan Traditional Territories 41 Map 7: Traditional Lands of the Tlingit 43 Map 8: Selected Landmarks: South Coast of Wrangell-St. Elias 149 Table 1: Placenames Identified by Thornton (2012), keyed to Map 5 32 Table 2: The Clans and Houses of Yakutat 47 Table 3: Shoreline Resources Traditionally Gathered by Northern Tlingit Communities 64 Table 4: Seasonal Round (adapted from Davis 1996:140) 67 Figure 1: The Village of S’ooska, or Port Mulgrave 50 Figure 2: The 1880s Survey of Harold Topham 57 Figure 3: View of Mount St. Elias and the Yahtse Glacier from Icy Bay 59 Figure 4: A Seal Camp Fronting Yakutat Bay, Early 20th century 70 Figure 5: Drying Sealskins at a Seal Camp on Yakutat Bay, Early 20th century 73 Figure 6: Students at the Swedish Covenant Mission, Early 20th century 120 Figure 7: The Waterfront of Yakutat as it Appeared in the Early 20th century 123 Figure 8: The Mount St. Elias Dancers as They Appeared in the 1950s 128 Figure 9: Military Aircraft at the Yakutat Air Base 130 Figure 10: An Example of a Yakutat Seal Hunting Boat in the Mid-20th century 141 Figure 11: Drying Seal Hides at Seal Camp in the Mid-20th century 145 Figure 12: Transporting Military Surplus Vehicles in the Mid-20th century 155 Figure 13: An Early Tour Boat Visiting the Base of Hubbard Glacier 174 Figure 14: Subsistence Harvest by Yakutat Residents by Resource Type, 1984 176 Figure 15: Subsistence Harvest by Yakutat residents, by Resource Category, 2000 177 Figure 16: The Mount St. Elias Dancers 212 Figure 17: The Entrance to the Alaska Native Brotherhood Hall, Camp 13, Yakutat Alaska 223 Yakutat Tlingit and Wrangell-St. Elias: An Ethnographic Overview and Assessment v LIST of ACRONYMS ADF&G: Alaska Department of Fish and Game ADNR: Alaska Department of Natural Resources ANB: Alaska Native Brotherhood ANCSA: Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act ANBANSGC: Alaska Native Brotherhood Alaska Native Sisterhood Grand Camp ANILCA: Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act ANS: Alaska Native Sisterhood CAC: The Chugach Alaska Corporation CBY: City and Borough of Yakutat CCC: Cordova Chamber of Commerce CCTHITA: Central Council of Tlingit and Haida Indian Tribes of Alaska CESU: Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit EO&A: Ethnographic Overview and Assessment GLBA: Glacier Bay National Park and Preserve GIS: Geographical Information Systems HAL: Haa Aani, LLC ( IRA: Indian Reorganization Act NPS: National Park Service NVE: Native Village of Eyak NVETC: Native Village of Eyak Traditional Council PSU: Portland State University TEK: Traditional Ecological Knowledge TCP: Traditional Cultural Property THPO: Tribal Historic Preservation Office USDA: United States Department of Agriculture USDAFS: United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service USDOIFWS: United States Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service USDOINPS: United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service USDSOH: United States Department of State, Office of the Historian USNARA: US National Archives and Records Administration WRST: Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve YCC: Yakutat Chamber of Commerce YTK: Yak-Tat Kwaan YTT: Yakutat Tlingit Tribe vi Yakutat Tlingit and Wrangell-St. Elias: An Ethnographic Overview and Assessment Introduction Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve, a unit of the National Park Service, is a place of sprawling superlatives. The largest national park in the United States, it encompasses some 20,587 square miles, or more than 13 million acres of land in southcentral Alaska (see Map 1). Sitting at a point where North American and Pacific tectonic plates collide at a wrenched right angle, the landscape of Wrangell-St. Elias ranges from the sea to the lofty summit of Mount St. Elias—at 18,008 feet, the second tallest peak in Alaska and the fourth tallest in North America. Indeed, fourteen of the twenty tallest peaks in North America are found in the Wrangell and St. Elias Mountain Ranges intersecting in the park. This unit of the National Park Service (NPS) also contains the most extensive array of glaciers and ice fields on the planet outside of polar regions. Indeed, the southern portion of the park, the study area of this document, is home to Hubbard Glacier, the world’s longest tidewater glacier,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Men of the “New” Makushin Village, Like Practically All Able-Bodied
    Chapter 6 The Lives of Sea Otter Hunters he men of the “new” Makushin Village, like practically all able-bodied Unanga{ men, were active sea otter hunters employed by the AC T Company. The reports that document the beginning of the long and irreversible decline of sea otter hunting tell us little about individuals. Among the names that do surface occasionally is that of Lazar Gordieff. He appears six times in the 1885-1889 AC Company copybook and in a few other documents. These fragmented records provide little more than shadows, but they are far more than we have for most Unanga{ of the late 19th century. Lazar was twenty-two in 1878 and living with his widowed father, two brothers and a sister at Chernofski.1 In a June 1885 letter from Rudolph Neumann, since 1880 the AC Company general agent at Unalaska, we learn that Lazar was given dried seal throats.2 From this it can be deduced that he crafted delicate models of kayaks. The throats of fur seals, removed, cleaned, and dried during the seal harvests in the Pribilof Islands, were the preferred material for covering the intricate wooden frames. This letter went to the agent on Wosnesenski Island, in the heart of the eastern sea otter grounds, where Gordieff was part of the summer hunting party. He may have spent time between hunts carving and assembling models. A few of these trade items, all anonymous, survive in museums and testify to intimate knowledge of the kayak and to a high degree of craftsmanship. The hunters were still away in August, but after they had returned to Unalaska in October and Neumann had gone over the records, which arrived on a subsequent ship, he discovered that Lazar owed the company $166 while another man owed $805.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of the Interior Reports of The
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY REPORTS OF THE ALASKA DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL AND GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS AND PREDECESSOR AGENCIES, 1913-1973, INDEXED BY QUmRANGLE BY Edward H. Cobb Open-f ile report 74- 209 1974 This report is preliminary and has not been edited or reviewed for conformity with Geological Survey standards NOTE NOTE NOTE Since this index was prepared 18 open-file reports of the Alaska Division of Geological and Geophysical Surveys have been withdrawn, consolidated, revised, or assigned different numbers. References to these reposts should be deleted from thes index. The report numbers are: 18, 19, 20, 21, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 32, 33, 34, 35, 37, 39, and 40. They are listed under the following quadrangles: Afognak Mar shall Ambler Mves McCarthy Anchorage Medf ra Baird Inlet Mt. Fairweather Bendeleben Mt. St. Elias Bering Glacier Nabesna Bethel Nunivak Island Big Delta Port Moller Cape Mendenhall Rubs Charley River St. Michael Chignik Sitka Coxdova Survey Pass Eagle Sutwik Island Hooper Bay Talkeetna ICY BY Talkeetna Mountains ILiamna Trinity Islands Kaguyak Tyonek Karluk Ugashik Kodiak Valde z Kwiguk Yakutat Contents Page Introduction ......................................................... Alaska - General ..................................................... Quadrangle index ..................................................... Adak quadrarLgle ................................................. Afognak quadrangle .............................................. Ambler River quadrangle ........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Yukon College Student Survey Results
    Yukon College Student Survey Results 2014-15 Dawn Macdonald Institutional Research and Planning Officer December 24, 2014 Yukon College Student Survey Results: 2014-15 TABLE OF CONTENTS HIGHLIGHTS ...................................................................................................................................................... 3 PURPOSE AND METHODS ............................................................................................................................. 5 RESULTS .............................................................................................................................................................. 6 STUDENT SATISFACTION ............................................................................................................................................ 6 More than nine out of ten would recommend their program or courses .................................... 6 Nearly everyone is satisfied with the quality of instruction ............................................................. 7 More than nine out of ten are satisfied with course content ........................................................... 7 Nine out of ten are satisfied with support services ............................................................................. 8 Nine out of ten are satisfied with program advising and library resources ............................... 9 Satisfaction with spaces for group work lags behind satisfaction with social spaces and study spaces ...................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Geographic Patterns in Morphometric and Genetic Variation for Coyote Populations with Emphasis on Southeastern Coyotes
    Received: 19 March 2018 | Revised: 2 December 2018 | Accepted: 20 December 2018 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.4966 ORIGINAL RESEARCH Geographic patterns in morphometric and genetic variation for coyote populations with emphasis on southeastern coyotes Joseph W. Hinton1 | Elizabeth Heppenheimer2 | Kyla M. West3 | Danny Caudill4 | Melissa L. Karlin5 | John C. Kilgo6 | John Joseph Mayer7 | Karl V. Miller1 | Margaret Walch8 | Bridgett vonHoldt2 | Michael J. Chamberlain1 1Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, Abstract Georgia Prior to 1900, coyotes (Canis latrans) were restricted to the western and central re- 2 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary gions of North America, but by the early 2000s, coyotes became ubiquitous through- Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey out the eastern United States. Information regarding morphological and genetic 3Tacoma, Washington structure of coyote populations in the southeastern United States is limited, and 4 Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation where data exist, they are rarely compared to those from other regions of North Commission, Gainesville, Florida America. We assessed geographic patterns in morphology and genetics of coyotes 5Department of Physics and Environmental Sciences, St. Mary’s University, San Antonio, with special consideration of coyotes in the southeastern United States. Mean body Texas mass of coyote populations increased along a west‐to‐east gradient, with southeast- 6United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service Southern ern coyotes being intermediate to western and northeastern coyotes. Similarly, prin- Research Station, New Ellenton, South cipal component analysis of body mass and linear body measurements suggested Carolina that southeastern coyotes were intermediate to western and northeastern coyotes in 7United States Department of Energy, Environmental Sciences, and body size but exhibited shorter tails and ears from other populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Case 17-12443 Doc 1 Filed 11/15/17 Page 1 Of
    Case 17-12443 Doc 1 Filed 11/15/17 Page 1 of 502 Case 17-12443 Doc 1 Filed 11/15/17 Page 2 of 502 Case 17-12443 Doc 1 Filed 11/15/17 Page 3 of 502 Case 17-12443 Doc 1 Filed 11/15/17 Page 4 of 502 Case 17-12443 Doc 1 Filed 11/15/17 Page 5 of 502 Case 17-12443 Doc 1 Filed 11/15/17 Page 6 of 502 Case 17-12443 Doc 1 Filed 11/15/17 Page 7 of 502 Case 17-12443 Doc 1 Filed 11/15/17 Page 8 of 502 Case 17-12443 Doc 1 Filed 11/15/17 Page 9 of 502 Case 17-12443 Doc 1 Filed 11/15/17 Page 10 of 502 Case 17-12443 Doc 1 Filed 11/15/17 Page 11 of 502 Case 17-12443 Doc 1 Filed 11/15/17 Page 12 of 502 Case 17-12443 Doc 1 Filed 11/15/17 Page 13 of 502 Case 17-12443 Doc 1 Filed 11/15/17 Page 14 of 502 Case 17-12443 Doc 1 Filed 11/15/17 Page 15 of 502 Case 17-12443 Doc 1 Filed 11/15/17 Page 16 of 502 Case 17-12443 Doc 1 Filed 11/15/17 Page 17 of 502 Case 17-12443 Doc 1 Filed 11/15/17 Page 18 of 502 Case 17-12443 Doc 1 Filed 11/15/17 Page 19 of 502 1 CYCLE CENTER H/D 1-ELEVEN INDUSTRIES 100 PERCENT 107 YEARICKS BLVD 3384 WHITE CAP DR 9630 AERO DR CENTRE HALL PA 16828 LAKE HAVASU CITY AZ 86406 SAN DIEGO CA 92123 100% SPPEDLAB LLC 120 INDUSTRIES 1520 MOTORSPORTS 9630 AERO DR GERALD DUFF 1520 L AVE SAN DIEGO CA 92123 30465 REMINGTON RD CAYCE SC 29033 CASTAIC CA 91384 1ST AMERICAN FIRE PROTECTION 1ST AYD CO 2 CLEAN P O BOX 2123 1325 GATEWAY DR PO BOX 161 MANSFIELD TX 76063-2123 ELGIN IN 60123 HEISSON WA 98622 2 WHEELS HEAVENLLC 2 X MOTORSPORTS 241 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION INC 2555 N FORSYTH RD STE A 1059 S COUNTRY CLUB DRRIVE DEPT LA 21511 ORLANDO FL 32807 MESA AZ
    [Show full text]
  • Los Cien Montes Más Prominentes Del Planeta D
    LOS CIEN MONTES MÁS PROMINENTES DEL PLANETA D. Metzler, E. Jurgalski, J. de Ferranti, A. Maizlish Nº Nombre Alt. Prom. Situación Lat. Long. Collado de referencia Alt. Lat. Long. 1 MOUNT EVEREST 8848 8848 Nepal/Tibet (China) 27°59'18" 86°55'27" 0 2 ACONCAGUA 6962 6962 Argentina -32°39'12" -70°00'39" 0 3 DENALI / MOUNT McKINLEY 6194 6144 Alaska (USA) 63°04'12" -151°00'15" SSW of Rivas (Nicaragua) 50 11°23'03" -85°51'11" 4 KILIMANJARO (KIBO) 5895 5885 Tanzania -3°04'33" 37°21'06" near Suez Canal 10 30°33'21" 32°07'04" 5 COLON/BOLIVAR * 5775 5584 Colombia 10°50'21" -73°41'09" local 191 10°43'51" -72°57'37" 6 MOUNT LOGAN 5959 5250 Yukon (Canada) 60°34'00" -140°24’14“ Mentasta Pass 709 62°55'19" -143°40’08“ 7 PICO DE ORIZABA / CITLALTÉPETL 5636 4922 Mexico 19°01'48" -97°16'15" Champagne Pass 714 60°47'26" -136°25'15" 8 VINSON MASSIF 4892 4892 Antarctica -78°31’32“ -85°37’02“ 0 New Guinea (Indonesia, Irian 9 PUNCAK JAYA / CARSTENSZ PYRAMID 4884 4884 -4°03'48" 137°11'09" 0 Jaya) 10 EL'BRUS 5642 4741 Russia 43°21'12" 42°26'21" West Pakistan 901 26°33'39" 63°39'17" 11 MONT BLANC 4808 4695 France 45°49'57" 06°51'52" near Ozero Kubenskoye 113 60°42'12" c.37°07'46" 12 DAMAVAND 5610 4667 Iran 35°57'18" 52°06'36" South of Kaukasus 943 42°01'27" 43°29'54" 13 KLYUCHEVSKAYA 4750 4649 Kamchatka (Russia) 56°03'15" 160°38'27" 101 60°23'27" 163°53'09" 14 NANGA PARBAT 8125 4608 Pakistan 35°14'21" 74°35'27" Zoji La 3517 34°16'39" 75°28'16" 15 MAUNA KEA 4205 4205 Hawaii (USA) 19°49'14" -155°28’05“ 0 16 JENGISH CHOKUSU 7435 4144 Kyrghysztan/China 42°02'15" 80°07'30"
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Maps of the Eastern Alaska Range, Alaska, (44 Quadrangles, 1:63360 Scale)
    Report of Investigations 2015-6 GEOLOGIC MAPS OF THE EASTERN ALASKA RANGE, ALASKA, (44 quadrangles, 1:63,360 scale) descriptions and interpretations of map units by Warren J. Nokleberg, John N. Aleinikoff, Gerard C. Bond, Oscar J. Ferrians, Jr., Paige L. Herzon, Ian M. Lange, Ronny T. Miyaoka, Donald H. Richter, Carl E. Schwab, Steven R. Silva, Thomas E. Smith, and Richard E. Zehner Southeastern Tanana Basin Southern Yukon–Tanana Upland and Terrane Delta River Granite Jarvis Mountain Aurora Peak Creek Terrane Hines Creek Fault Black Rapids Glacier Jarvis Creek Glacier Subterrane - Southern Yukon–Tanana Terrane Windy Terrane Denali Denali Fault Fault East Susitna Canwell Batholith Glacier Maclaren Glacier McCallum Creek- Metamorhic Belt Meteor Peak Slate Creek Thrust Broxson Gulch Fault Thrust Rainbow Mountain Slana River Subterrane, Wrangellia Terrane Phelan Delta Creek River Highway Slana River Subterrane, Wrangellia Terrane Published by STATE OF ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL & GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS 2015 GEOLOGIC MAPS OF THE EASTERN ALASKA RANGE, ALASKA, (44 quadrangles, 1:63,360 scale) descriptions and interpretations of map units Warren J. Nokleberg, John N. Aleinikoff, Gerard C. Bond, Oscar J. Ferrians, Jr., Paige L. Herzon, Ian M. Lange, Ronny T. Miyaoka, Donald H. Richter, Carl E. Schwab, Steven R. Silva, Thomas E. Smith, and Richard E. Zehner COVER: View toward the north across the eastern Alaska Range and into the southern Yukon–Tanana Upland highlighting geologic, structural, and geomorphic features. View is across the central Mount Hayes Quadrangle and is centered on the Delta River, Richardson Highway, and Trans-Alaska Pipeline System (TAPS). Major geologic features, from south to north, are: (1) the Slana River Subterrane, Wrangellia Terrane; (2) the Maclaren Terrane containing the Maclaren Glacier Metamorphic Belt to the south and the East Susitna Batholith to the north; (3) the Windy Terrane; (4) the Aurora Peak Terrane; and (5) the Jarvis Creek Glacier Subterrane of the Yukon–Tanana Terrane.
    [Show full text]
  • Mount Sanford…Errrr, Mount Jarvis. Wait, What?? Mount Who?? It Was Roughly Around Thanksgiving 2016 and the Time Had Come Fo
    Mount Sanford…errrr, Mount Jarvis. Wait, what?? Mount Who?? It was roughly around Thanksgiving 2016 and the time had come for me to book my next IMG adventure. With two young children at home and no family close by, I had settled into a routine of doing a big climb every other year. This year was a bit different, as I normally book my major climbs around September for an April or May departure the following year. However, due to a Mt. Blackburn (Alaska) trip falling through, I had to book another expedition. In 2015, I was on an IMG team that summitted Mt. Bona from the north side, not the original plan (jot that down – this will become a theme in Alaska), and really enjoyed the solitude, adventure, physical challenge, small team, and lack of schedule the Wrangell & St Elias Mountains had to offer. So, I hopped on IMG’s website, checked out the scheduled Alaskan climb for 2017, which was Mt. Sanford, and peppered George with my typical questions. Everything lined up, so I completed the pile of paperwork (do I really have to sign another waiver?!?), sent in my deposit (still no AMEX, ugh…), set my training schedule, and started Googling trip reports about Mt. Sanford. Little did I know that READING about Mt. Sanford was the closest I would ever get to it! Pulling from my previous Alaskan climbing experience, I was better prepared for this trip than for Mt Bona in 2015. Due to our bush pilot’s inability to safely land us on the south side of Bona two years prior, we flew up, around, and over the mountain and landed on the north side.
    [Show full text]
  • The Alaska-Yukon Region of the Circumboreal Vegetation Map (CBVM)
    CAFF Strategy Series Report September 2015 The Alaska-Yukon Region of the Circumboreal Vegetation Map (CBVM) ARCTIC COUNCIL Acknowledgements CAFF Designated Agencies: • Norwegian Environment Agency, Trondheim, Norway • Environment Canada, Ottawa, Canada • Faroese Museum of Natural History, Tórshavn, Faroe Islands (Kingdom of Denmark) • Finnish Ministry of the Environment, Helsinki, Finland • Icelandic Institute of Natural History, Reykjavik, Iceland • Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Greenland • Russian Federation Ministry of Natural Resources, Moscow, Russia • Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Stockholm, Sweden • United States Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, Alaska CAFF Permanent Participant Organizations: • Aleut International Association (AIA) • Arctic Athabaskan Council (AAC) • Gwich’in Council International (GCI) • Inuit Circumpolar Council (ICC) • Russian Indigenous Peoples of the North (RAIPON) • Saami Council This publication should be cited as: Jorgensen, T. and D. Meidinger. 2015. The Alaska Yukon Region of the Circumboreal Vegetation map (CBVM). CAFF Strategies Series Report. Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna, Akureyri, Iceland. ISBN: 978- 9935-431-48-6 Cover photo: Photo: George Spade/Shutterstock.com Back cover: Photo: Doug Lemke/Shutterstock.com Design and layout: Courtney Price For more information please contact: CAFF International Secretariat Borgir, Nordurslod 600 Akureyri, Iceland Phone: +354 462-3350 Fax: +354 462-3390 Email: [email protected] Internet: www.caff.is CAFF Designated
    [Show full text]
  • Southcentral Alaska Stock
    Revised: April 2014 NORTHERN SEA OTTER (Enhydra lutris kenyoni): Southcentral Alaska Stock STOCK DEFINITION AND GEOGRAPHIC RANGE Sea otters occur in nearshore coastal waters of the U.S. along the North Pacific Rim from the Aleutian Islands to California. The species is most commonly observed within the 40-meter (approximately 12.2 feet [ft]) depth contour because the animals require frequent access to benthic foraging habitat in subtidal and intertidal zones (Reidman and Estes 1990). Sea otters are not migratory and generally do not disperse over long distances, although movements of tens of kilometers (km) (tens of miles [mi]) are common (Garshelis and Garshelis 1984). Annual home range sizes of adult sea otters are relatively small, with male territories ranging from 4 to 11 square kilometers (km2) (approximately 10.5 to 28.5 square miles[mi2]) and adult female home ranges from a few to 24 km2 (approximately 62 mi2) (Garshelis and Garshelis 1984; Ralls et al. 1988; Jameson 1989). Due to their benthic foraging, sea otter distribution is largely limited by their ability to dive to the sea floor (Bodkin et al. 2004). 1 Figure 1. Approximate distribution and stock boundaries of northern sea otters in Alaska waters (shaded area). The spatial scale at which sea otter populations are managed remains an important, although largely unexplored issue (Bodkin and Ballachey 2010) deserving further study. Bodkin and Ballachey (2010) used models of sea otter mortality to show that range-wide reductions and extirpations during the commercial fur trade of the 18th and 19th centuries occurred not simply because of excessive harvest, but because the harvest was not allocated proportional to the abundance and distribution of sea otters.
    [Show full text]
  • The Unladylike Ladies of Roller Derby?: How Spectators, Players and Derby Wives Do and Redo Gender and Heteronormativity in All-Female Roller Derby
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by White Rose E-theses Online The Unladylike Ladies of Roller Derby?: How Spectators, Players and Derby Wives Do and Redo Gender and Heteronormativity in All-Female Roller Derby Megan Geneva Murray PhD The University of York Women’s Studies January 2012 Abstract All-female roller derby is a rapidly growing full-contact sport played on quad roller skates, with a highly popularized punk, feminine, sexual and tough aesthetic. Utilising theories on the institution of heterosexuality, I conducted a qualitative study on all-female roller derby which evaluated the way in which derby aligns with or challenges heteronormativity. In order to approach this question, I analysed, firstly, thirty-eight interviews with spectators, and twelve with players about their interactions with spectators. Secondly, I interviewed twenty-six players about the phenomenon of “derby wives,” a term used to describe particular female friendships in roller derby. My findings relate the complex relationship between players and spectators by focusing on: (i) spectators’ interpretations of the dress, pseudonyms, and identities of players, as well as the ways in which they were actively involved in doing gender through their discussions of all-female, coed, and all-male roller derby; (ii) players’ descriptions of their interactions with spectators, family members, romantic partners, friends and strangers, regarding roller derby. Additionally, I address the reformulation of the role “wife” to meet the needs of female players within the community, and “derby wives” as an example of Adrienne Rich’s (1980) “lesbian continuum.” “Derby girls” are described as “super heroes” and “rock stars.” Their pseudonyms are believed to help them “transform” once they take to the track.
    [Show full text]
  • FALL 2003 - Volume 50, Number 3 Put High-Res Scan Off ZIP Disk of Book Cover in This Blue Space Finished Size: 36 Picas Wide by 52 Picas High
    FALL 2003 - Volume 50, Number 3 Put high-res scan off ZIP disk of book cover in this blue space finished size: 36 picas wide by 52 picas high Air Force Historical Foundation Benefits of Membership Besides publishing the quarterly journal Air Power History, the Foundation fulfills a most unique mis- sion by acting as a focal point on matters relating to air power generally, and the United States Air Force in particular. Among its many worthy involvements, the Foundation underwrites the publication of meaningful works in air power history, co-sponsors air power symposia with a national scope, and provides awards to deserving scholars. In 1953, a virtual “hall of fame” in aviation, including Generals Spaatz, Eaker Vandenberg, Twining, andFoulois, met to form the Air Force Historical Foundation, “to preserve and perpetuate the history and traditions of the U.S. Air Force and its predecessor organizations and of those whose lives have been devoted to the service.” By joining, one becomes part of this great fellowship doing worth- Exclusive Offer for Air Force Historical Foundation Members while work, and receives an exceptional quarterly publication as well. See page 55 for details. Come Join Us! Become a member. FALL 2003 - Volume 50, Number 3 Why the U.S. Air Force Did Not Use the F–47 Thunderbolt in the Korean War Michael D. Rowland 4 “Big Ben”: Sergeant Benjamin F. Warmer III, Flying Ace John W. Hinds 14 The Dark Ages of Strategic Airlift: the Propeller Era Kenneth P. Werrell 20 Towards a Place in History David G. Styles 34 Remembrance Richard C.
    [Show full text]