DOCSLIB.ORG

Margaret Chase Smith and Me: the Importance of Leadership

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Margaret Chase Smith and Me: the Importance of Leadership Maine Policy Review Volume 27 Issue 2 2018 Margaret Chase Smith and Me: The Importance of Leadership Nora Tyson [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/mpr Recommended Citation Tyson, Nora. "Margaret Chase Smith and Me: The Importance of Leadership." Maine Policy Review 27.2 (2018) : 6 -9, https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/mpr/vol27/iss2/1. This Essay is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. T HE M ARGARE T C HASE S M I T H E SSAY graduation, I returned home to Margaret Chase Smith and Me: Memphis, and a few weeks later, I got a The Importance of Leadership call from a Navy recruiter. He asked me in for a chat, and since I didn’t have anything better to do at the time, I went by Vice Admiral Nora Tyson, Retired to the recruiting office to see what it was all about. irst, a little about me. I retired Committee and, subsequently, the The recruiter asked me to take an Ffrom the United States Navy last Senate Armed Services Committee, and aptitude test, so I took the test and did September after a little over 38 years of throughout her career, Senator Smith pretty well. He told me that I could go service. My last job on active duty was espoused “preparedness ensures peace.” into cryptology, supply, intelligence, Third Fleet commander headquartered In fact, she reiterated throughout her and a few other things, but never said a in San Diego. Third Fleet is comprised career the message of her 1938 Navy word about ships or airplanes. This was of all the naval forces on the West Day speech that military weakness leads long before the laws were changed to Coast of the United States out to the to war and preparedness ensures peace. allow women to serve on ships and International Date Line, except for She said, “the surest way to prevent war aircraft in combat. Ultimately, after a the ballistic missile submarines, which is to be ready to go to war.” I couldn’t few more discussions, I thought, “Why belong to the strategic command out of agree more. not? If I don’t, I’ll always wonder what Omaha, Nebraska. Third Fleet is made I wish I had had the opportunity to would have happened if I had and up of about 110 ships, 400 aircraft, 30 meet Senator Smith and thank her. In a what’s four years?” submarines, 5 carrier strike groups, an sense, I feel we are somewhat soul mates. At the time of my commissioning, amphibious strike group, and around We both, through no design of our own, not many occupations were open to 60,000 people. found ourselves blazing In preparation this speech, I did trails for women. Senator some research on Senator Smith and Smith blazed a trail found that I owe her a huge debt of because her husband, gratitude. I also found many similarities Clyde, died while in in our respective careers. The most office. He knew his wife obvious similarity is that we are both was the most qualified women and both served our fellow person for the job and Americans most of our adult lives. We asked his friends to also both sort of fell into the professions support her in her run for to which we dedicated our lives, profes- Congress. As for me, sions that, I think, we both felt we had because the combat avia- been destined for. tion exclusion laws were Most likely, I wouldn’t be giving repealed in 1991 and this talk had it not been for the efforts because I had applied and the “firm determination” of Senator myself, I found myself Margaret Chase Smith. Her persistence eligible for assignments in seeing the Women’s Armed Services that previously had not Integration Act passed in 1948 opened been open to women. the door for me and thousands of other I grew up in women to serve our country and paved Memphis, Tennessee, and the way for future legislation that went to Vanderbilt Always a strong proponent of women in the military, opened even more opportunity for University in Nashville, here Margaret Chase Smith is pictured with President women in the military. Tennessee. I was a decent Harry S. Truman as he signed the Army-Navy Nurses Senator Smith was a strong propo- student, an English major Act of 1947. The Women’s Armed Services Integration nent of our Armed Services. She served who was thinking about Act was passed the following year. for many years on the Naval Affairs going to law school. After Photo courtesy of the Margaret Chase Smith Library. MAINE POLICY REVIEW • Vol. 27, No. 2 • 2018 6 T HE M ARGARE T C HASE S M I T H E SSAY women in the Navy, and I ended up in wasn’t about gender. It was about opportunity for those you lead and Washington, D.C., in an administrative mission, getting the job done, solving helping them reach their potential. It is job, which I quickly realized wasn’t for the problem. I am proud of all those about communicating and collabo- me. I worked for a couple of senior male firsts, but I’m even more proud that rating to solve problems. It is about aviators who realized I probably those milestones are now behind us. listening to others, valuing their input, wouldn’t stay in the Navy if I were rele- Someone had to be first, and I feel and caring about and respecting them as gated to administrative jobs, and they extraordinarily fortunate that I was in people. It is about putting yourself in steered me toward flight school and a the right place at the right time. others’ shoes and looking at things career in naval aviation. That decision Margaret Chase Smith said, “I truly through their perspectives. That is how eventually opened up opportunities that believe that one’s sex should not be a to build a cohesive, functional team that I had never dreamed of because many of determinant in the selection of public can solve complex problems. those opportunities had not been an officials.” Our military has opened I believe the key to being a option when I joined the Navy. I had virtually every occupation to anyone successful leader is understanding two some amazing experiences, and I was who meets the requirements. There are things: yourself and your team. If you thrilled with the level of responsibility I many people—both male and female— don’t have the you part right, it will be was afforded as a junior officer. who don’t meet the requirements for hard to lead others. I have learned Over the years, I kept making the many reasons. That’s why it is critical through personal experience and obser- most of whatever opportunities presented that we make the effort to understand vation of others that you must be true themselves, and the Navy found new what is required—mentally, physically, to yourself and not try to be something and challenging jobs for me. Laws and emotionally—to do a specific job. If we that you are not. From my observa- policies changed, and I was fortunate don’t make the effort to understand the tions, many women feel they must be enough to have command of a squadron, requirements, we may be forfeiting the more masculine, less emotional, less an amphibious assault ship, and to serve opportunity to have the best person in empathetic to succeed, particularly in with outstanding leaders and be the job. promoted to admiral. And I loved what Again, I quote I did! I believe that it is important for Margaret Chase Smith: leaders to love what they do. “ability and proved perfor- I found success by being humble mance, rather than sex, and accepting challenges, sometimes are the best standards for turning adversity into opportunity, by political selection.” The staying smart on my craft, and truly way I see it, when a valuing the contributions of everyone woman is the best quali- who worked for me at any time. I fied candidate, she should learned when to lead from the front, get the job; when she isn’t and when to step back and let others the best qualified, she step up. Experience is one of the best shouldn’t get the job. But contributions to being a good leader. gone are the days of Like Senator Smith, I was fortunate female service members to be the first woman to do several never knowing if they things: the first woman to command an could have qualified. aircraft carrier strike group, our Task Leadership isn’t Force in Singapore, the largest maritime defined by how we look, exercise in the world, and a numbered it is defined by our fleet. Many times in my career, I looked thoughts and our actions. around the room and found that I was Leadership is about Vice Admiral Tyson on the Naval Station Norfolk the only woman, and many of those solving problems and (Virginia) waterfront with several of the US Navy’s times, I was the commander or the making a difference. It is amphibious ships in the background. senior person. I learned early on that it about opening doors to Photo courtesy of Nora Tyson. MAINE POLICY REVIEW • Vol. 27, No. 2 • 2018 7 T HE M ARGARE T C HASE S M I T H E SSAY historically male-dominated professions. and at every level, but it isn’t just gender Smith did.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Alternative Naval Force Structure
    Alternative Naval Force Structure A compendium by CIMSEC Articles By Steve Wills · Javier Gonzalez · Tom Meyer · Bob Hein · Eric Beaty Chuck Hill · Jan Musil · Wayne P. Hughes Jr. Edited By Dmitry Filipoff · David Van Dyk · John Stryker 1 Contents Preface ................................................................................................................................ 3 The Perils of Alternative Force Structure ................................................... 4 By Steve Wills Unmanned­Centric Force Structure ............................................................... 8 By Javier Gonzalez Proposing A Modern High Speed Transport – The Long Range Patrol Vessel ................................................................................................... 11 By Tom Meyer No Time To Spare: Drawing on History to Inspire Capability Innovation in Today’s Navy ................................................................................. 15 By Bob Hein Enhancing Existing Force Structure by Optimizing Maritime Service Specialization .............................................................................................. 18 By Eric Beaty Augment Naval Force Structure By Upgunning The Coast Guard .......................................................................................................... 21 By Chuck Hill A Fleet Plan for 2045: The Navy the U.S. Ought to be Building ..... 25 By Jan Musil Closing Remarks on Changing Naval Force Structure ....................... 31 By Wayne P. Hughes Jr. CIMSEC 22 www.cimsec.org
    [Show full text]
  • Saipan Tribune Page 2 of 2
    Saipan Tribune Page 2 of 2 ,,," '."..,..US,." .Y """I,"', "...I,, -.-.A I., .I," -I...", .Y. ..,",. .'U""'J, I IYI""IIIIY."~I justified. The area is said to have vegetation and a small pond. The Navy's land use request was coursed through the Office of the Veterans Affairs. Story by Liberty Dones Contact this reporter http://www.saipantribune.com/newsstory.aspx?cat=l&newsID=27904 4/29/03 Marianas Variety On-Line Edition Page 1 of 1 Community biiilcls ties with sailors (DCCA) - Saipan’s reputation as a port of call for U.S. Navy ships is receiving a big boost thanks to a new program that’s building personal ties between island families and sailors. Under its new Sponsor-A-Service Member program, the Department of Community and Cultural Affairs put 18 visiting sailors from the USS Antietam in touch with a local family who voluntarily hosted them while the ship was in Saipan earlier this month. “I want to thank... everyone on your island paradise for making our visit ...on Saipan the best Port Call I’ve ever had - ever!” said Lt. Cmdr. Timothy White, ship chaplain. “Your kindness and hospitality were like nothing we had ever experienced before.” Mite and other sailors were welcomed into the home of Noel and Rita Chargualaf, the first of Saipan residents to sign up for the program. “Every single man who participated has just raved about the wonderful time they had with the families,” said White. “You truly live in an island paradise and the people on your island are the nicest folks I have ever met.” “For the most, they were just thrilled to be around children and families.
    [Show full text]
  • US Navy Program Guide 2012
    U.S. NAVY PROGRAM GUIDE 2012 U.S. NAVY PROGRAM GUIDE 2012 FOREWORD The U.S. Navy is the world’s preeminent cal change continues in the Arab world. Nations like Iran maritime force. Our fleet operates forward every day, and North Korea continue to pursue nuclear capabilities, providing America offshore options to deter conflict and while rising powers are rapidly modernizing their militar- advance our national interests in an era of uncertainty. ies and investing in capabilities to deny freedom of action As it has for more than 200 years, our Navy remains ready on the sea, in the air and in cyberspace. To ensure we are for today’s challenges. Our fleet continues to deliver cred- prepared to meet our missions, I will continue to focus on ible capability for deterrence, sea control, and power pro- my three main priorities: 1) Remain ready to meet current jection to prevent and contain conflict and to fight and challenges, today; 2) Build a relevant and capable future win our nation’s wars. We protect the interconnected sys- force; and 3) Enable and support our Sailors, Navy Civil- tems of trade, information, and security that enable our ians, and their Families. Most importantly, we will ensure nation’s economic prosperity while ensuring operational we do not create a “hollow force” unable to do the mission access for the Joint force to the maritime domain and the due to shortfalls in maintenance, personnel, or training. littorals. These are fiscally challenging times. We will pursue these Our Navy is integral to combat, counter-terrorism, and priorities effectively and efficiently, innovating to maxi- crisis response.
    [Show full text]
  • Supply Corps Senior Leadership
    JANUARY / FEBRUARY 2017 Supply Corps Senior Leadership Happy New Year! As we begin 2017, I am optimistic that we will build on the many successes of 2016, and that we are well-positioned as a community to meet the challenges and leverage the opportunities ahead of us. One of the ways in which we are so well-posi- tioned is the strength of our team, and it is my pleasure to introduce our new Command Master Chief, Thaddeus T. Wright, who joined NAVSUP on November 2, 2016. Master A Message from the Chief Wright brings a wealth of knowledge and experience to the command and the Chief of Supply Corps enlisted community, as well as a fresh, new perspective to the NAVSUP team. This edition of the Supply Corps Newsletter features articles from the Supply Corps Senior Leadership Symposium held in Leesburg, Virginia, in November 2016. Flag Officers, Senior Executive Service members, Captains, and Captain-selects met to review the current state of our community, explore key initiatives, and prepare for 2017 and beyond. Topics such as our alignment with the Navy’s Design for Maintaining Maritime Superiority, how we plan and execute in support of the full range of military operations, the role of mentor- ship in our community, and the increasing scope of our expeditionary support, highlight not only how our supply community is evolving, but also how our mission of providing world class supplies, services, and quality of life support to the warfighter is ever-enduring. Whether you are or may one day be part of our Reserve Component or FTS Supply Corps team, I encourage you to attend the upcoming National RC Supply Corps Sympo- sium in Dallas, Texas, May 20 and 21.
    [Show full text]
  • February 6 , 2 0
    FEBRUARY 6, 2017 3 USSF APPROVES IFRV COVERALL Williams also spent time with the Chiefs 5 EXTENDING YOUR ENLISTMENT in the Mess. 6 PREPARING FOR WORST USS Shiloh “Rear Adm. Williams talked to us about 7 BATAAN KICKS OFF WORTH Sailors Prepare owning the ship – and challenged us to be an owner and not just an operator,” said Gas 8 GET EDUCATED WITH VOLED for INSURV Turbine System Technician (Mechanical) 9 OUTREACHES FOR VETERANS Story from USS Shiloh Public A airs Chief Petty O cer Edward Bill, of Broadus, Montana. Shiloh is scheduled to have With only 103 days to go until INSURV their INSURV the rst week of May. (the Navy’s Board of Inspection and Survey), During INSURV, inspectors will visit every Rear Adm. Charles Williams, commander, compartment, test every piece of equipment, Number 2 | 2017 www.ah.mil Task Force (CTF) 70 and Carrier Strike and assess the ship’s overall readiness to Group (CSG) 5, visited USS Shiloh (CG 67), ensure the ship is ready to ght. Secretary of the Navy, Acting Jan. 19, to motivate the crew and lend them “Not everyone looks forward to INSURV e Honorable Sean J. Stackley his support. because of the stress and attention to Chief of Naval Operations INSURV is a Congressionally-mandated detail required,” said Lt. j.g. Ryan Dallas, of Adm. John M. Richardson inspection enacted to ensure that ships of the Charleston, South Carolina. “but Shiloh has Navy Chief of Information United States Navy are properly equipped the most determined crew on the waterfront, Rear Adm.
    [Show full text]
  • Exam Rate Name Command Short Title ABE1 AMETO YAOVI AZO
    Exam Rate Name Command Short Title ABE1 AMETO YAOVI AZO USS JOHN C STENNIS ABE1 FATTY MUTARR TRANSITPERSU PUGET SOUND WA ABE1 GONZALES BRIAN USS NIMITZ ABE1 GRANTHAM MASON USS DWIGHT D EISENHOWER ABE1 HO TRAN HUYNH B TRANSITPERSU PUGET SOUND WA ABE1 IVIE CASEY TERR NAS JACKSONVILLE FL ABE1 LAXAMANA KAMYLL USS GERALD R FORD CVN-78 ABE1 MORENO ALBERTO NAVCRUITDIST CHICAGO IL ABE1 ONEAL CHAMONE C PERSUPP DET NORTH ISLAND CA ABE1 PINTORE JOHN MA USS GEORGE H W BUSH ABE1 RIVERA MARIANI USS THEODORE ROOSEVELT ABE1 ROMERO ESPERANZ NOSC SAN DIEGO CA ABE1 SANMIGUEL MICHA USS GEORGE H W BUSH ABE1 SANTOS ANGELA V USS CARL VINSON ABE2 ANTOINE BRODRIC PERSUPPDET KEY WEST FL ABE2 AUSTIN ARMANI V USS RONALD REAGAN ABE2 AYOUB FADI ZEYA USS CARL VINSON ABE2 BAKER KATHLEEN USS ABRAHAM LINCOLN ABE2 BARNABE ALEXAND USS RONALD REAGAN ABE2 BEATON TOWAANA USS ABRAHAM LINCOLN ABE2 BEDOYA NICOLE USS THEODORE ROOSEVELT ABE2 BIRDPEREZ ZULYR HELICOPTER MINE COUNT SQ 12 VA ABE2 BLANCO FERNANDO USS GEORGE WASHINGTON ABE2 BRAMWELL ALEXAR USS HARRY S TRUMAN ABE2 CARBY TAVOY KAM PERSUPPDET KEY WEST FL ABE2 CARRANZA KEKOAK USS GEORGE WASHINGTON ABE2 CASTRO BENJAMIN USS THEODORE ROOSEVELT ABE2 CIPRIANO IRICE USS NIMITZ ABE2 CONNER MATTHEW USS JOHN C STENNIS ABE2 DOVE JESSICA PA USS THEODORE ROOSEVELT ABE2 DREXLER WILLIAM PERSUPP DET CHINA LAKE CA ABE2 DUDREY SARAH JO USS GEORGE H W BUSH ABE2 FERNANDEZ ROBER USS THEODORE ROOSEVELT ABE2 GAL DANIEL USS GEORGE H W BUSH ABE2 GARCIA ALEXANDE NAS LEMOORE CA ABE2 GREENE DONOVAN USS RONALD REAGAN ABE2 HALL CASSIDY RA USS THEODORE
    [Show full text]
  • U.S.-China Military Contacts: Issues for Congress
    U.S.-China Military Contacts: Issues for Congress Shirley A. Kan Specialist in Asian Security Affairs October 27, 2014 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL32496 U.S.-China Military Contacts: Issues for Congress Summary This CRS Report, updated through the 113th Congress, discusses policy issues regarding military- to-military (mil-to-mil) contacts with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and records major contacts and crises since 1993. The United States suspended military contacts with China and imposed sanctions on arms sales in response to the Tiananmen Crackdown in 1989. In 1993, President Clinton reengaged with the top PRC leadership, including China’s military, the People’s Liberation Army (PLA). Renewed military exchanges with the PLA have not regained the closeness reached in the 1980s, when U.S.-PRC strategic alignment against the Soviet Union included U.S. arms sales to China. Improvements and deteriorations in overall bilateral engagement have affected military contacts, which were close in 1997-1998 and 2000, but marred by the 1995-1996 Taiwan Strait crisis, mistaken NATO bombing of a PRC embassy in 1999, the EP-3 aircraft collision crisis in 2001, and the PLA’s aggressive maritime and air confrontations. Issues for Congress include whether the Administration complies with legislation overseeing dealings with the PLA and pursues contacts with the PLA that advance a prioritized set of U.S. security interests, especially the operational safety of U.S. military personnel. Oversight legislation includes the Foreign Relations Authorization Act for FY1990-FY1991 (P.L. 101-246) and National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for FY2000 (P.L.
    [Show full text]
  • Navy Ship Names: Background for Congress
    Navy Ship Names: Background for Congress Updated October 29, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov RS22478 Navy Ship Names: Background for Congress Summary Names for Navy ships traditionally have been chosen and announced by the Secretary of the Navy, under the direction of the President and in accordance with rules prescribed by Congress. Rules for giving certain types of names to certain types of Navy ships have evolved over time. There have been exceptions to the Navy’s ship-naming rules, particularly for the purpose of naming a ship for a person when the rule for that type of ship would have called for it to be named for something else. Some observers have perceived a breakdown in, or corruption of, the rules for naming Navy ships. Section 1749 of the FY2020 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) (S. 1790/P.L. 116-92 of December 20, 2019) prohibits the Secretary of Defense, in naming a new ship (or other asset) or renaming an existing ship (or other asset), from giving the asset a name that refers to, or includes a term referring to, the Confederate States of America, including any name referring to a person who served or held leadership within the Confederacy, or a Confederate battlefield victory. The provision also states that “nothing in this section may be construed as requiring a Secretary concerned to initiate a review of previously named assets.” Section 1749 of the House-reported FY2021 NDAA (H.R. 6395) would prohibit the public display of the Confederate battle flag on Department of Defense (DOD) property, including naval vessels.
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Review of Recent Surface Force Incidents 26 Oct 2017
    COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF RECENT SURFACE FORCE INCIDENTS 26 OCT 2017 Table of Contents 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................ 5 1.2 Summary of 2017 Mishaps .......................................................................................................................... 11 1.3 Summary of Findings and Actions ........................................................................................................... 16 1.3.1 Poor seamanship and failure to follow safe navigational practices .................................... 16 1.3.2 Degraded watchteam performance..................................................................................................... 16 1.3.3 Erosion of crew readiness, planning and safety practices ...................................................... 17 1.3.4 Headquarters processes inadequately identified, assessed, and managed operational risks ............................................................................................................................................................... 17 1.3.5 Assessments do not reinforce effective learning ......................................................................... 18 1.3.6 “Can-do” culture undermined basic watchstanding and safety standards
    [Show full text]
  • US-China Military Contacts
    U.S.-China Military Contacts: Issues for Congress Shirley A. Kan Specialist in Asian Security Affairs March 19, 2009 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL32496 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress U.S.-China Military Contacts: Issues for Congress Summary This CRS Report discusses policy issues regarding military-to-military (mil-to-mil) contacts with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and provides a record of major contacts since 1993. The United States suspended military contacts with China and imposed sanctions on arms sales in response to the Tiananmen Crackdown in 1989. In 1993, the Clinton Administration began to re- engage the PRC leadership up to the highest level and including China’s military, the People’s Liberation Army (PLA). Renewed military exchanges with the PLA have not regained the closeness reached in the 1980s, when U.S.-PRC strategic cooperation against the Soviet Union included U.S. arms sales to China. Improvements and deteriorations in overall bilateral relations have affected military contacts, which were close in 1997-1998 and 2000, but marred by the 1995-1996 Taiwan Strait crisis, mistaken NATO bombing of a PRC embassy in 1999, and the EP- 3 aircraft collision crisis in 2001 as well as the naval confrontations in March 2009. Since 2001, the Bush Administration has continued the policy of engagement with China, while the Pentagon has skeptically reviewed and cautiously resumed a program of military-to-military exchanges. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, in 2002, resumed the Defense Consultative Talks (DCT) with the PLA (first held in 1997) and, in 2003, hosted General Cao Gangchuan, a Vice Chairman of the Central Military Commission (CMC) and Defense Minister.
    [Show full text]
  • Japan 2011 Earthquake: U.S
    Japan 2011 Earthquake: U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) Response Andrew Feickert Specialist in Military Ground Forces Emma Chanlett-Avery Specialist in Asian Affairs March 17, 2011 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R41690 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Japan 2011 Earthquake: U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) Response Overview With almost 40,000 U.S. troops stationed in Japan, the March 11, 2011, earthquake and tsunami is unique in that U.S. forces and associated resources were located in close proximity to deal with the crisis. All services—Army, Navy, Marine Corps, and Air Force—are present in Japan in various capacities. In addition, U.S. forces train regularly with their Japanese Self Defense Force (SDF) counterparts, including many humanitarian assistance and disaster relief exercises. With 100,000 SDF troops called up to respond to the disaster, U.S. forces were able to coordinate their efforts almost immediately to provide support for the Japanese responders. Within five days of the earthquake, the SDF had deployed 76,000 personnel (45,000 ground, 31,000 air and maritime); 194 rotary aircrafts and 322 fixed-wings; and 58 ships. As of March 16, the SDF had rescued 19,300 people, in addition to supporting activities at the troubled nuclear reactors.1 Operational Update2 DOD officials report that as of the morning of March 17, 14 U.S. naval ships and their aircraft and 17,000 sailors and Marines are now involved in humanitarian assistance and disaster relief efforts in and around Japan. These efforts have included 132 helicopter sorties and 641 fixed- wing sorties moving both people and supplies, assisting in search and rescue efforts, and delivering 129,000 gallons of water and 4,200 pounds of food.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter 2009 Review the .SU
    Naval War College Review Volume 62 Article 23 Number 1 Winter 2009 Winter 2009 Review The .SU . Naval War College Follow this and additional works at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review Recommended Citation War College, The .SU . Naval (2009) "Winter 2009 Review," Naval War College Review: Vol. 62 : No. 1 , Article 23. Available at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol62/iss1/23 This Full Issue is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Naval War College Review by an authorized editor of U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NAVAL WAR C War College: Winter 2009 Review OLLEGEREVIEW NAVAL WAR COLLEGE REVIEW Winter 2009 Volume 62, Number 1 Winter 2009 Winter N ES AV T A A L T W S A D R E C T I O L N L U E E G H E T I VIRIBU OR A S CT MARI VI Published by U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons, 2009 1 Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profile Composite Default screen Naval War College Review, Vol. 62 [2009], No. 1, Art. 23 Cover The United States Fleet in the Strait of Magellan on 5 February 1908, by Henry Reuterdahl (1871–1925), oil-on-canvas painting, courtesy of the Hope Club ar- chives, reproduced with permission from the Hope Club, Providence, Rhode Island. This cover image completes our centen- nial observance of the world cruise of the U.S.
    [Show full text]