1St Overlying Aquifer I 5.0 X Lo-'" I

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1St Overlying Aquifer I 5.0 X Lo-' Edward Mehnert, Craig . Gendron, and Ross D. Illinois State Geological Survey Final Report Prepared for United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Drinking Water David Morganwalp, Project Officer EPA Cooperative Agreement No. CR-813508-01-0 and Hazardous Waste Research and Information Center Department of Energy and Natural Resources Jacqueline Peden, Project Officer ENR Contract No. HWR 86022 1990 ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY 135 HWRlC RR 051 ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Natural Resources Building 615 East Peabody Drive Champaign, Illinois 61820 HAZARDOUS WASTE RESEARCH AND INFORMATION CENTER One East Hazelwood Drive Champaign, Illinois 61820 C INVESTlG 8 TE ctural Def init he or Long-Term Injection ypothetical Conduits ory and practical application sf S DIX B Reduction and analysis of geophysical lo APPENDIX C Bnrcite formation: proposed mechanis APPENDIX D Sensitivity analysis iii Location of investigation site Generalized areal geology of the bedrock surface Generalized statewide cross sections of Illinois Description of rock units and their hydrogeologic roles Geologic structures in lillinois Seismic risk map for Illinois Earthquake epicenters in Illinois Oil and gas fields of the Illinois Basin Location of underground gas storage projects in lllinsis Generalized thickness and distribution of the Cross section from Rockford to Cairo showing position of base of the USD Generalized thickne distribution of the Hunton Supergroup and the TDS boundary for U Generalized thickness and distribution of the New Albany Gr Generalized thickness and TDS boundary for USD Geologic column for the injection system at Stratigraphic correlation utilizing resistivity I outhwest -northeast cross section 28 Qualitative permeability correlation utilizing permeability indicator logs for southwest-northeast cross section Stratigraphic correlations utilizing resistivity logs for north-south cross section Structure contour map of the top of the Lingle Formation in the vicinity of the Velsicol plant lnjection system in WDW2 indicating permeable and impermeable units delineated with available geophys Injection system in WDW2 indicat le and impermeable units delineated after ph Injection system in ating permeable and impermeable units delineated after ph Core locations for WDW2 Core permeabilities (air and water) versus depth for WDW2 Core permeabilities versus core porosities for WDW2 Unit locations for WDW2 Water level record for the Devonian Observation Well (DOW), inclu data from injection test Plot of data used for Cooper-Jacob analysis Schematic for WDW2 Schematic for DOW Relationship between waste viscosity and specific gravity The compressibility of water and various NaCl solutions versus temperature Comparison of model-predicted drawdowns with results from Theis analysis Comparison of model-predicted drawdowns versus time with Hantush analysis Conceptual model 1 of the injection system Comparison of model-predicted Ah versus field data Head buildup versus radial distance for q = 1.82~1 m3/sec lnjection scenario 1 : head buildup and decline with time at the DO lnjection scenario 2: head buildup and decline with time at the DO lnjection scenario 2: head buildup and decline with time at WD Conceptual model 2 of the injection system hysical logs run in the DO physical logs run i formation characteristics Fluid loss percentage calculated from CSFL Gore location and analysis Results of core analysis Summary of hydrogeological data for a portion of the disposal zone Additional hydrogeological data for primary injection sections Selected chemical and physical properties of water injected during injection test Volume injected into W2 during injection test Analysis of injection Selected parameters for fluids injected via Chemical analysis of waste an Compressibility of waste and brine lnput data far the Theis solution lnput data for leaky aquifer simulation Selected input data for model calibration Comparison of transmissivity (T) and storativity (S) values Permeability of the microannulus Data from geophysical logs run in the DO Data from existing geophysical logs run in WDW2 Summary of important formation characteristics Core p~rositiesand brucite concentration Effect of brucite concentration on total flow Effect of boundary conditions on head buildup Printed by authoriv of the State of ll/inois/1990/1000 vi Ivi cal rati ss sts de 16) I ir tireless assis not . Cahill, Beverly S logical Survey (IS % the core, waste strea Evans, ISGS, for csmpilin IC wastes. r the U.S. Envirsn ency, for his assis- roject manager, and sistance and patience during this rian Visocky, Illinois State Water Survey, for his a se, Bruce R. Hensei, Timothy Larson, Janis D. Tre S,for their insighfful review of vii numerical modelin study was conducte tigate the hydraulic effects of liquid waste in- jection on an injecti system. The site in was a chemical refinery with an operational Class I well and an ell, both completed in Devonian limestone. Input data for the model were obtained from available records and field investigations. The regional geologic investigation indicated that the injection system (defined here as the injec- tion zone and its associated confining units) was laterally continuous. The hydraulic response of the injection system was numerically modeled under two injection scenarios: average historical in- jection rate and maximum average permitted rate. For both scenarios, pressure buildup from ste injection during the simulated 30-year injection and 30-year postinjection periods did not ap- proach the pressure calculated to be necessary to initiate or propagate fractures in the injection system. Therefore, injected waste would be contained, and waste injection at this site and for the scenarios modeled would not endanger human health or the environment. This analysis assumes that hydraulic conductivity remains constant; however, the formation of brucite within the injection zone may invalidate this assumption and the preceding analysis. Brucite formation within the injection zone requires additional study. The model was also used to investigate the response of the injection system when a hypothetical conduit was introduced. This hypothetical conduit connected the uppermost injection zone with an overlying aquifer. Differences in head buildup were not monitorable in the injection well or in an observation well completed in the injection zone. onitorable head differences were observed only in the overlying aquifer, when the hydraulic conductivity of the hypothetical conduit was greater than or equal to 1x1 0-lo m2. viii Concern over the po water contamination from waste injection prompted faceted research eff US. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) an dustry. The research with data needed to determine if underground injection sf hamardou an health or the environment. One facet of this re- search effsat was an investigation of the hydraulic effects of deep-well injection on the injection system. The injection system includes the geologic units constituting the injection zone and the upper and units. The site of this investigation as a chemical refinery in Illinois that has an ction well and an observation well complete in Devonian limestone. ld be conducted, a hydrogeologic description of the site was developed from available records and geophysical logs. umerous records and logs were avail- able from oil- and gas-related tests and wells within a 10-mile radius of the site. Logs and records for on-site wells were also used. In addition, hydraulic tests and geophysical logs were run to obtain detailed hydrogeologic data on the injection system. TWOhydraulic tests ere run in the injection well: a continuous spinner flowmeter survey and a 15-day injection test. Sidewall cores were also retrieved from the injection well. The following geophysical logs were run in the observation well: Compensated Neutron Log, Borehole Compensated Sonic Log, Minilog, Dual Induction Spherically Focused Log, and Gamma Ray Log. Although analyses of the data from these logs and tests yielded much information concerning the hydrogeologic character of the injection system, there was one discrepancy-the results of the spinner flowmeter indicated that the waste was flowing through different zones of the injection sys- tem than had been theorized from the results of geophysical logging. To clarify this discrepancy, we conducted additional analyses (x-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopy). The dis- crepancy can be explained briefly as follows. Because of its high pH, the injected wastewater g2+present in the injection zones or in solution, forming brucite ( Brucite accumulation reduces the permeability of the injection zone. Greater amounts of brucite apparently formed in the injection zone where the flow of fluid was greater; thus the zones with higher permeability were affected first. dditional work beyond the scope of this project is needed to verify the brucite-formation hypothesis. Also, the long-term effect of this decrease in per- meability on injectivity needs to be investigated. A description of the regional and site-specific stratigraphy, structural geology, and hydrogeology of the injection system was generated from a review of available data and the field work con- ducted during this project. This description formed the basis of input for the numerical model. Model input also included data on the physical and chemical characteristics of the injected waste- water and the native brine in the injection system. These data were employed as input data for
Recommended publications
  • Bedrock Geology of Altenburg Quadrangle, Jackson County
    BEDROCK GEOLOGY OF ALTENBURG QUADRANGLE Institute of Natural Resource Sustainability William W. Shilts, Executive Director JACKSON COUNTY, ILLINOIS AND PERRY COUNTY, MISSOURI STATEMAP Altenburg-BG ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY E. Donald McKay III, Interim Director Mary J. Seid, Joseph A. Devera, Allen L. Weedman, and Dewey H. Amos 2009 360 GEOLOGIC UNITS ) ) ) 14 Qal Alluvial deposits ) 13 18 Quaternary Pleistocene and Holocene 17 360 ) 15 360 16 14 0 36 ) 13 Qf Fan deposits ) Unconformity Qal ) & 350 tl Lower Tradewater Formation Atokan ) ) Pennsylvanian 360 ) &cv Caseyville Formation Morrowan 24 360 ) Unconformity ) 17 Upper Elviran undivided, Meu ) Waltersburg to top of Degonia 19 20 Qal 21 22 23 ) 24 ) Mv Vienna Limestone 360 o ) 3 Mts ) 350 Mts Tar Springs Sandstone ) 20 360 ) Mgd 360 30 ) Mgd Glen Dean Limestone ) 21 350 360 Mts 29 ) Qal Hardinsburg Sandstone and J N Mhg Chesterian ) Golconda Formations h Æ Qal Mav anc 28 27 Br ) N oJ 26 25 JN 85 N ) Cypress Sandstone through J Mcpc Dsl 500 Paint Creek Formation JN N ) J o Mts N 5 J s ) Dgt 600 J N 70 J N Mgd Yankeetown Formation s ) Myr Db 80 28 Æ and Renault Sandstone N J 29 N J N ) Sb J Mgd Mississippian o Dgt Ssc 25 Clines o N 25 Msg 27 ) Qal J 80 s 3 Mav Aux Vases Sandstone N J N Mts o MILL J MISSISSIPPI 34 ) Qal J N ) N J Dsl 35 N 26 J o N 25 J Mgd Mgd ) Msg Ste. Genevieve Limestone 500 o Db DITCH J 20 Mgd N N N ) J J o RIVER o N 600 J 80 N ) 10 o J Mav Æ Msl St.
    [Show full text]
  • Directory of Illinois Mineral Producers, and Maps of Extraction Sites 1997
    j:MH7 Directory of Illinois Mineral Producers, and Maps of Extraction Sites 1997 John M. Masters, Viju C. Ipe, Lisa R. Smith, and Michael Falter (Office of Mines and Minerals) Department of Natural Resources ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ILLINOIS MINERALS 117 1999 Directory of Illinois Mineral Producers, and Maps of Extraction 1997 John M. Masters, Viju C. Ipe, Lisa R. Smith, and Michael Faiter (Office of Mines and Minerals) Illinois Minerals 117 t<C?* 1999 %*+ noS§> linois State Geological Survey ^o^ ^<^ J * William W. Shilts, Chief v Natural Resources Building <& 615 East Peabody Drive ^ Champaign, IL 61820-6964 Phone:(217)333-4747 COVER: This large hydraulic dredge recovers sand and gravel from the Wisconsinan-age valley-train deposit in the background. Material is pumped in a slurry to a floating processing plant connected to the dredge. Products are then conveyed directly to barges for shipment to market (photo by J.M. Masters, August 1987). ILLIMOI MATURAL RESOURCES © Printed with soybean ink on recycled paper Printed by authority of the State of Illinois/1999/800 CONTENTS Introduction 1 Illinois Mineral Producers, by County 6 Illinois Mineral Producers, by Company 15 Illinois Mineral Producers, by Commodity 22 Barite 22 Cadmium 22 Cement 22 Clay products 23 Clay mines 24 Coal 25 Coke 28 Fluorspar 28 Fly ash 28 Glass products 30 Gypsum, calcined 31 Industrial sand mines 31 Iron oxide pigments 32 Iron and raw steel 32 Lime 33 Natural gas liquids 33 Peat 33 Perlite, expanded 34 Petroleum refineries 34 Sand and gravel 35 Slag 60
    [Show full text]
  • Geology and Oil Production in the Tuscola Area, Illinois
    124 KUItOfS GEOLOGICAL S SURVEY LIBRARY 14.GS: 4^ ^ CIR 424 :. 1 STATE OF ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION AND EDUCATION Geology and Oil Production in the Tuscola Area, Illinois H. M. Bristol Ronald Prescott ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY John C. Frye, Chief URBANA CIRCULAR 424 1968 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2012 with funding from University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign http://archive.org/details/geologyoilproduc424bris GEOLOGY AND OIL PRODUCTION IN THE TUSCOLA AREA, ILLINOIS H. M. Bristol and Ronald Prescott ABSTRACT The Tuscola Anticline, in east-central Illinois, lies astride the complex LaSalle Anticlinal Belt and dips steeply westward into the Fairfield Basin and gradually eastward into the Murdock Syncline. The anticline is broken into two structural highs, the Hayes Dome and the Shaw Dome. Pleistocene sediments, 50 to 250 feet thick, cover the area. Pennsylvanian sediments cover much of the area, thinning to expose an inlier of Mississippian, Devonian, and Silurian rock north of Tuscola. The basal Cambrian for- mation, the Mt. Simon Sandstone, is penetrated by only two wells. Oil production from the Kimmswick (Trenton) com- menced in 1962 from the R. D. Ernest No. 1 Schweighart well, near Hayes, and as of January 1, 1968, approximately 30 wells were producing oil. Cumulative oil production as of January 1, 1968, is approximately 94,000 barrels. The potential pay zone is confined to the upper 5 to 100 feet of structure and to the upper 125 feet of the Kimmswick, whose permeability ranges from 0.1 to 2. millidarcys, av- eraging 0.6, and whose porosity ranges from 2 to 12 per- cent.
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Tower Limestone (Devonian) of Southern Illinois
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship... STATE OF ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION AND EDUCATION GRAND TOWER LIMESTONE (DEVONIAN) OF SOUTHERN ILLINOIS Wayne F. Meents David H. Swann ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY John C. Frye, Chief URBANA CIRCULAR 389 1965 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2012 with funding from University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign http://archive.org/details/grandtowerlimest389meen GRAND TOWER LIMESTONE (DEVONIAN) OF SOUTHERN ILLINOIS Wayne F. Meents and David H. Swann ABSTRACT The Grand Tower Limestone has been the source of over a hundred million barrels of oil in Illinois, the bulk of the Devo- nian production of the state. The formation underlies most of southern and central Illinois and extends into Missouri, Iowa, Indiana, and Kentucky, where its equivalents are the Cooper, Wapsipinicon, and Jeffersonville Limestones. The Grand Tower has a maximum thickness of a little more than 200 feet. It is a sandy, but otherwise pure, carbonate unit that forms approxi- mately the lower half of the Middle Devonian carbonate sequence of the region. TheGrand Tower is dominantly fossiliferous lime- stone in southern Illinois, dolomite in most of central Illinois, and lithographic limestone where it pinches out in north-central Illinois against the Sangamon Arch. The Sangamon Arch was an east-west structure that probably separated the Grand Tower from the Wapsipinicon Limestone of northern Illinois and Iowa during their deposition. Ithasbeen so modified by post-Devonian move- ments that it is no longer an important structural element.
    [Show full text]
  • Synoptic Taxonomy of Major Fossil Groups
    APPENDIX Synoptic Taxonomy of Major Fossil Groups Important fossil taxa are listed down to the lowest practical taxonomic level; in most cases, this will be the ordinal or subordinallevel. Abbreviated stratigraphic units in parentheses (e.g., UCamb-Ree) indicate maximum range known for the group; units followed by question marks are isolated occurrences followed generally by an interval with no known representatives. Taxa with ranges to "Ree" are extant. Data are extracted principally from Harland et al. (1967), Moore et al. (1956 et seq.), Sepkoski (1982), Romer (1966), Colbert (1980), Moy-Thomas and Miles (1971), Taylor (1981), and Brasier (1980). KINGDOM MONERA Class Ciliata (cont.) Order Spirotrichia (Tintinnida) (UOrd-Rec) DIVISION CYANOPHYTA ?Class [mertae sedis Order Chitinozoa (Proterozoic?, LOrd-UDev) Class Cyanophyceae Class Actinopoda Order Chroococcales (Archean-Rec) Subclass Radiolaria Order Nostocales (Archean-Ree) Order Polycystina Order Spongiostromales (Archean-Ree) Suborder Spumellaria (MCamb-Rec) Order Stigonematales (LDev-Rec) Suborder Nasselaria (Dev-Ree) Three minor orders KINGDOM ANIMALIA KINGDOM PROTISTA PHYLUM PORIFERA PHYLUM PROTOZOA Class Hexactinellida Order Amphidiscophora (Miss-Ree) Class Rhizopodea Order Hexactinosida (MTrias-Rec) Order Foraminiferida* Order Lyssacinosida (LCamb-Rec) Suborder Allogromiina (UCamb-Ree) Order Lychniscosida (UTrias-Rec) Suborder Textulariina (LCamb-Ree) Class Demospongia Suborder Fusulinina (Ord-Perm) Order Monaxonida (MCamb-Ree) Suborder Miliolina (Sil-Ree) Order Lithistida
    [Show full text]
  • Erigenia : Journal of the Southern Illinois Native Plant Society
    JNIVERSITY OF iLLINOIS LIBRARY AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN NAT M!<5T "^ijRV. Digitized by tine Internet Archive in 2010 witii funding from Biodiversity Heritage Library littp://www.arcliive.org/details/erigeniajournalo1519821985sout SOUTHERN ILLINOIS GEOLOGY NAT URAL H I S T O RY SIIRVEY APR 8 1985 2 THE UBMKY a ' THE N0V2 1 84 «c„°;'^, EKiGQIA JOURNAL OF THE SOUTHERN ILLINOIS NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY SOUTHERN ILLINOIS NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY OFFICERS FOR 1983 JOumaL OF THC SOUT>«l« LLMOn NAT1VC RJtffT SOOKTY President: David Mueller Vice President: John Neumann NUr«ER 2 issued: APRIL 1983 Secretary: Keith McMullen Treasurer: Lawrence Stritch CCNTDfTS: soothern Illinois geology Editorial 1 ERIGENIA Paleozoic Life and Climates of Southern Illinois 2 Editor: Mark U. Mohlenbrock Field Log to the Devonian, Dept. of Botany & Microbiology Mississlppian, and Pennsyl- Arizona State University vanian Systems of Jackson and Union Counties, Illinois . 19 Co-Editor: Margaret L. Gallagher Landforms of the Natural Dept. of Botany & Microbiology Divisions of Southern Arizona State University Illinoia Al The Soils of Southern Illinois . 57 Editorial Review Board: Our Contributors 68 Dr. Donald Biasing Dept. of Botany Southern Illinois University The SINPS is dedicated to the preservation, conservation, and Dr. Dan Evans study of the native plants and Biology Department vegetation of southern Illinois. Marshall University Huntington, West Virginia Membership includes subscription to ERIGENIA as well as to the Dr. Donald Ugent quarterly newsletter THE HAR~ Dept. of Botany BINGER. ERIGBilA , the official Southern Illinois University journal of the Southern Illinois Native Plant Society, is pub- Dr. Donald Pinkava lished occasionally by the Society. Dept. of Botany & Microbiology Single copies of this issue may Arizona State University be purchased for $3.50 (including postage) .
    [Show full text]
  • Paleozoic Geology of the New Madrid Area
    NUREG/CR-2909 I ..Paleozoic Geology of the New Madrid Area Prepared by H. R. Schwalb Illinois State Geological Survey Prepared for U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, or any of their employees, makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability of re- sponsibility for any third party's use, or the results of such use, of any information, apparatus, product or protess disclosed in this report, or represents that its use by such third party would not infringe privately owned rights. Availability of Reference Materials Cited in NRC Publications Most documents cited in NRC publications will be available from one of the following sources: 1. The NRC Public Document Room, 1717 H Street, N.W. Washington,'DC 20555 2. The NRC/GPO Sales Program, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555 3. The National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161 Although the listing that follows represents the majority of documents cited in NRC publications, it is not intended to be exhaustive. Referenced documents available for inspection and copying for a fee from the NRC Public Docu- ment Room include NRC correspondence and internal NRC memoranda; NRC Office of Inspection and Enforcement bulletins, circulars, information notices, inspection and investigation notices; Licensee Event Reports; vendor reports and correspondence; Commission papers; and applicant and licensee documents and correspondence. The following documents in the NUREG series are available for purchase from the NRC/GPO Sales Program: formal NRC staff and contractor reports, NRC-sponsored conference proceedings, and NRC booklets and brochures.
    [Show full text]
  • Type Fossil Mollusca (Hyolitha, Polyplacophora, Scaphopoda, Monoplacophora, and Gastropoda) in Field Museum
    FIELDIANA Geology Published by Field Museum of Natural History Volumeflf 36 Type Fossil Mollusca (Hyolitha, Polyplacophora, Scaphopoda, monoplacophora, and gastropoda) IN Field Museum Gerald Glen Forney AND Matthew H. Nitecki October 29. 1976 FIELDIANA: GEOLOGY A ContiniuUion of the GEOLOGICAL SERIES of FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY VOLUME ^S(, FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY CHICAGO, U.S.A. Type Fossil Mollusca (Hyolitha, Polyplacophora, Scaphopoda, monoplacophora, and gastropoda) IN Field Museum FIELDIANA Geology Published by Field Museum of Natural History \ol\xmei6 j^j Type Fossil Mollusca (Hyolitha, Polyplacophora, Scaphopoda. monoplacophora, and gastropoda) IN Field Museum Gerald Glenn Forney Chicago Natural History Museum Fellow, Department of the Geophysical Sciences University of Chicago AND Matthew H. Nitecki Curator, Fossil Invertebrates Field Museum of Natural History October 29. 1976 Publication 1239 "Although there is a fundamental difference between paleozoology and the names of fossils, this difference is not always clear." Yochelson and Saunders, 1967, p. 3. Library of Congress Catalog Card No. : 76-23000 PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Introduction 1 Type Hyolitha 6 Type Polyplacophora 10 Type Scaphopoda II Type Monoplacophoi^ 13 Type Gastropoda 16 Stratigraphic table 223 References 227 111 INTRODUCTION Living molluscs are commonly divided into three major classes (Gas- tropoda, Cephalopoda, and Bivalvia), and four minor classes (Mono- placophora, Polyplacophora, Scaphopoda, and Aplacophora). Although many extinct classes of molluscs have been proposed, the generally accepted ones are Hyolitha (Marek, 1963), Mattheva (Yochclson, 1966), Stenothecoida (Yochelson, 1969), and Rostroconchia (Pojeta et al., 1972). This catalogue lists the type and referred specimens of fossils repre- senting five of these 1 1 molluscan classes.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Soluble Salts in Limestones and Dolomites
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and... STATE OF ILLINOIS WILLIAM G. STRATTON, Governor DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION AND EDUCATION VERA M. SINKS, Director DIVISION OF THE STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY M. M. LEIGHTON, Chief URBANA REPORT OF INVESTIGATIONS—NO. 164 WATER SOLUBLE SALTS IN LIMESTONES AND DOLOMITES By J. E. LAMAR AND RAYMOND S. SHRODE Reprinted from Economic Geology, Volume 48, pp. 97-112, 1953 PRINTED BY AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS URBANA, ILLINOIS 1953 ORGANIZATION STATE OF ILLINOIS HON. WILLIAM G. STRATTON, Governor DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION AND EDUCATION HON. VERA M. BINKS, Director BOARD OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND CONSERVATION HON. VERA M. BINKS, Chairman W. H. NEWHOUSE, Ph.D.. Geology ROGER ADAMS, Ph.D., D.Sc, Chemistry LOUIS R. HOWSON. C.E., Engineering A. E. EMERSON, Ph.D., Biology LEWIS H. TIFFANY. Ph.D., Pd.D., Forestry GEORGE D. STODDARD, Ph.D., Litt.D., LL.D., L.H.D. President of the University of Illinois DELYTE W. MORRIS, Ph.D. President of Southern Illinois University GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DIVISION M. M. LEIGHTON. Ph.D.. Chief SURVEY ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL 3 3051 00005 8424 Reprinted from Economic Geology, Vol. 48, No. 2, March-April, 1953 Printed in U. S. A. WATER SOLUBLE SALTS IN LIMESTONES AND DOLOMITES.* J. E. LAMAR AND RAYMOND S. SHRODE. ABSTRACT. Samples of representative Illinois limestones and dolomites were ground in distilled water and the amount of water-soluble salts in the resulting leaches was determined by chemical analysis and by weighing the leach solids resulting from evaporating the leaches.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation of the Hydraulic Effects of Deep-Well Injection of Industrial Wastes
    EG 135 HWRIC RR 051 INVESTIGATION OF THE HYDRAULIC EFFECTS OF DEEP-WELL INJECTION OF INDUSTRIAL WASTES Edward Mehnert, Craig R. Gendron, and Ross D. Brower ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY 135 HWRIC RR 051 1990 Department of Energy and Natural Resources Illinois State Geological Survey Hazardous Waste Research and Information Center INVESTIGATION OF THE HYDRAULIC EFFECTS OF DEEP-WELL INJECTION OF INDUSTRIAL WASTES Edward Mehnert, Craig R. Gendron, and Ross D. Brower Illinois State Geological Survey Final Report Prepared for United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Drinking Water David Morganwalp, Project Officer EPA Cooperative Agreement No. CR-813508-01-0 and Hazardous Waste Research and Information Center Department of Energy and Natural Resources Jacqueline Peden, Project Officer ENR Contract No. HWR 86022 1990 ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY 135 HWRIC RR 051 ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Natural Resources Building 615 East Peabody Drive Champaign, Illinois 61820 HAZARDOUS WASTE RESEARCH AND INFORMATION CENTER One East Hazelwood Drive Champaign, Illinois 61820 CONTENTS FIGURES iv TABLES vi ACKNOWLEDGMENTS vii ABSTRACT viii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ix GLOSSARY xi 1. INTRODUCTION 1 Background 1 Purpose 2 2. GEOLOGY OF THE INJECTION SYSTEM 3 Overview of the Geologic Environment 3 Regional Geology and Hydrogeology 14 3. HYDROGEOLOGIC INVESTIGATION OF THE INJECTION SYSTEM 23 Stratigraphic and Structural Definition of the Injection System 23 Field Investigations 32 4. NUMERICAL MODELING 48 Model Selection 48 Model Description 48 Input Data 49 Modeling
    [Show full text]
  • Silurian Pinnacle Reef Distribution in Illinois: Model for Hydrocarbon Exploration
    SILURIAN PINNACLE REEF DISTRIBUTION IN ILLINOIS: MODEL FOR HYDROCARBON EXPLORATION Stephen T. Whitaker I ....... i ...1.._ ------L ~ ~ -------~ UIIRAR u NOV 7 19£v f, STATE GEOlOGICAL Illinois Petroleum 130 1988 ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Department of Energy and Natural Resources ...___ LIBRARY _____, Graphic Artist: Pamella K. Foster Editor: E. W. Stenzel ..:' .. Whitaker, Stephen T. Silurian pinnacle reef distribution in Illinois: model for hydrocar­ bon exploration.- Champaign, IL: Illinois State Geological Sur­ vey, 1988. p.: illus.; 28 em.- (Illinois petroleum; 130) Bibliography: p. t Reefs- Illinois. 2. Reefs- Silurian - Illinois. I. Title. II. Series. Printed by authority of the State of 11/inois/198811500 SILURIAN PINNACLE REEF DISTRIBUTION IN ILLINOIS: MODEL FOR HYDROCARBON EXPLORATION Stephen T. Whitaker NOV 7 19 8 ~ I l. SIAl£ IEOtaAI. U Illinois Petroleum 130 1988 ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Morris W. Leighton, Chief Natural Resources Building 615 East Peabody Drive Champaign, IL 61820 CONTENTS ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION 3 SILURIAN PINNACLE REEFS IN ILLINOIS BASIN AREA 7 Distribution of Pinnacle Reefs 8 Previous hypotheses 9 Ramp-platform hypothesis 11 HYDROCARBON ENTRAPMENT 21 HYDROCARBON EXPLORATION 23 Structure Mapping 23 Subsurface mapping 23 Surface mapping 23 Seismic structure mapping 23 Stratigraphic Mapping 25 Lithologic studies 25 Seismic stratigraphy 25 Gravity Mapping 27 CONCLUSION 29 REFERENCES 31 TABLE Production associated with reefs in Illinois 4 FIGURES 1 Location of Silurian pinnacle reefs in Illinois
    [Show full text]
  • Index to the Geologic Names of North America
    Index to the Geologic Names of North America GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1056-B Index to the Geologic Names of North America By DRUID WILSON, GRACE C. KEROHER, and BLANCHE E. HANSEN GEOLOGIC NAMES OF NORTH AMERICA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 10S6-B Geologic names arranged by age and by area containing type locality. Includes names in Greenland, the West Indies, the Pacific Island possessions of the United States, and the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1959 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRED A. SEATON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D.G. - Price 60 cents (paper cover) CONTENTS Page Major stratigraphic and time divisions in use by the U.S. Geological Survey._ iv Introduction______________________________________ 407 Acknowledgments. _--__ _______ _________________________________ 410 Bibliography________________________________________________ 410 Symbols___________________________________ 413 Geologic time and time-stratigraphic (time-rock) units________________ 415 Time terms of nongeographic origin_______________________-______ 415 Cenozoic_________________________________________________ 415 Pleistocene (glacial)______________________________________ 415 Cenozoic (marine)_______________________________________ 418 Eastern North America_______________________________ 418 Western North America__-__-_____----------__-----____ 419 Cenozoic (continental)___________________________________
    [Show full text]