DOCSLIB.ORG

Rhetoric and Informal Logic

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rhetoric and Informal Logic UNIVERSITY OF WINDSOR Department of Philosophy Philosophy 561 Rhetoric and Informal Logic Chris Tindale Fall 2015 Chrysler Hall North 2183 M : 7:00-9:50 [email protected] CHN 2193 Office Hours: Wednesday Afternoon. Course description: The relationship between rhetoric and logic is fraught with tension, in spite of their once companionable places (along with grammar) in the trivium of the mediaeval university. Rhetoric is often dismissed as mere adornment to the substance of logic. In the early stages of the revolution in logic that gave birth to informal logic a similar disregard of rhetoric persisted. But that attitude has more recently been revised as informal logicians have entered into fruitful dialogues with contemporary rhetoricians. Still, there is a sense that rhetorical concerns can remain an afterthought for the logician, and the serious question needs still to be asked about the role that rhetoric can and should play in the development of informal modes of reasoning. In this course, we will ask that question, exploring the nature of ancient and contemporary rhetoric, the emergence of informal logic, and the ways in which the interests of the two can be seen to converge. Course Structure: The course will be conducted as a seminar/discussion. Members of the class will be expected to have read the material each week and be prepared to engage in discussion. Required Texts: All readings are listed week by week in the syllabus, and will be made available in the department, online, or through the reserve desk at the library. Requirements: 1. Two short papers responding to specific questions that arise in the first half of the term, worth 20% in each case, for a total of 40%. Questions are provided from September 21 to October 19. Choose two. 2. Class-preparedness and participation: 10%. Students should be prepared to engage in discussions. 3. A major paper will be due by November 30 (3:30). This can be written in drafts throughout the latter part of the course. Length and nature of the paper will depend on the topic chosen, which will arise from discussions with the instructor. The paper is worth 50% of the course grade. 1 Class Schedule: September: 14: Introduction to the course: What is Rhetoric? Reading: Wayne Booth “The Rhetorical Stance”; Lloyd Bitzer “The Rhetorical Situation”; Jennifer Richards (Rhetoric, Introduction) 21: Aristotle’s Gaze Reading: Aristotle, Rhetoric Book One, Chapters 2-15 (Kennedy translation) Library Reserve; Myles Burnyeat “Enthymeme: Aristotle on the Rationality of Rhetoric” Question: To what degree do logos, pathos, and ethos capture important features of the rhetorical situation? 28: Rhetoric Now Reading: Chaim Perelman, Realm of Rhetoric, Chapters 1-4, Library Reserve; Jeanne Fahnestock, “Rhetoric in the Age of Cognitive Science” Question: Does Perelman’s attention to the importance of audience involve a substantial shift from the treatment provided by Aristotle? October: 5: Rhetoric as a Humanistic Endeavor Reading: Ernesto Grassi, “Rhetoric and Philosophy”; Michael Leff, “Rhetoric and Dialectic in the Twentieth Century”; Steve Mailloux, “Humanist Controversies.” Question(s): Aristotle judged dialectic and rhetoric to be complementary. How does Leff understand this relationship? Is his understanding of rhetoric consistent with those of people like Perelman and Bitzer? 12: THANKSGIVING 19: The Varieties of Informal Logic Reading: Ralph Johnson, “Some Reflections on the Informal Logic Initiative”; Tony Blair, “Informal Logic and Logic.” Question: Drawing on the accounts provided by Blair and Johnson, what do you judge to be the crucial, distinguishing features of informal logic, and why? 26: The Nature of Argument Reading: Terence Parsons, “What is an Argument?” Geoff Goddu, “Is ‘Argument’ Subject to the Product/Process Ambiguity?” November: 2: The Problem of Argumentation Schemes 2 Reading: Doug Walton and Chris Reed, “Argumentation Schemes and Defeasible Inferences”; Tony Blair, “Walton’s Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning: A Critique and Development.” 9: Informal Logic and the Role of Rhetoric: The Critical Reaction Reading: Trudy Govier, “When They Can’t Talk Back: The Noninteractive Audience and the Theory of Argument”; Ralph Johnson, “The Blaze of Her Splendors: Suggestions about Revitalizing Fallacy Theory.” 16: The Problem of Standards: Where do they arise? Reading: Stephen Toulmin, The Uses of Argument, Chapter 1 (available online through the library); Frans van Eemeren, Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse, Chapter 2, Library Reserve; Chris Tindale, “On Cognitive Environments.” 23: Rhetorical themes: Ambiguities (the nature of language). Reading: Wayne Booth, “Metaphor as Rhetoric”; William Irwin, “What is an Illusion?” 30: Images and Narratives Reading: Georges Roque, “Should Visual Arguments be Propositional in Order to be Arguments?”; Paula Olmos, “Narration as Argument.” [Course Evaluations] December 7: Extending Evaluation Select Bibliography Aristotle (2007) On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse. 2nd edition. George A. Kennedy (Trans. Introduction, Notes, & Appendices), Oxford: Oxford University Press. Bitzer, L. (1968) “The Rhetorical Situation,” Philosophy and Rhetoric, 1:1-14. Blair, J.A. (2009) “Informal Logic and Logic.” Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 16 (29): 47-67. Blair, J.A. (2001) “Walton’s Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning: A Critique and Development.” Argumentation (15):365-79. Booth, W. (1970) “The Rhetorical Stance” in Now Don’t Try to Reason with Me. Chicago University Press. Booth, W. “Metaphor as Rhetoric: The Problem of Evaluation,” Critical Inquiry 5 (1):49- 72. Burnyeat, M. (1996) “Enthymeme: Aristotle on the Rationality of Rhetoric” in Essay on Aristotle’s Rhetoric,” A.O. Rorty (Ed.). University of Chicago Press:88-115. Eemeren, F. H. van (2010) Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Fahnestock, J. (2005) “Rhetoric in the Age of Cognitive Science”. The Viability of Rhetoric. Graff, Richard. ed. New York: State University of New York Press. Goddu, G. (2011) “Is ‘Argument’ Subject to the Product/Process Ambiguity?” Informal Logic 31 (2):75-88. 3 Govier, T. & L. Ayers (2012) “Logic, Parables, and Argument” Informal Logic. 32(2):161-189. Govier, T. (1999) “When They Can’t Talk Back: The Noninteractive Audience and the Theory of Argument,” in The Philosophy of Argument. Vale Press:183-201. Grassi, E. (1980) “Rhetoric and Philosophy,” in Philosophy as Rhetoric: The Humanist Tradition. University Park: Penn State University Press:18-34. Groarke, L. (2011) “Informal Logic.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-informal/. Hamblin, (1970) Fallacies. Newport News, VA: Vale Press. Irwin, W. (2001) “What is an Illusion?” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. 59 (3):287-297. Johnson, R. (2009) “Some Reflections on the Informal Logic Initiative” Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 16 (29): 17-46. Johnson, R. (1987) “The Blaze of Her Splendors: Suggestions about Revitalizing Fallacy Theory.” Argumentation (1):239-53. Johnson, R., and J. A. Blair (1987) “The Current State of Informal Logic.” Informal Logic 9: 147-151. Kvernbekk, T. (2003) “Narratives as Informal Arguments,” IL@25. Windsor:OSSA, CD Rom. Pp.1-11. Leff, M. (2000) “Rhetoric and Dialectic in the Twentieth Century” Argumentation (14):241-54. Mailloux, S. (2012) “Humanist Controversies: The Rhetorical Humanism of Ernesto Grassi and Michael Leff,” Philosophy and Rhetoric, 45 (2):134-47. O’Keefe, D. (1977) “Two Concepts of Argument.” JAFA: Journal of the American Forensic Association 13: 121-128. Olmos, P. (2013) “Narration as Argument,” OSSA Conference Archive. Paper 123. http://scholar.uwindsor.ca/ossaarchive/OSSA10/papersandcommentaries/123 Parsons, T. (1996) “What is an Argument?” The Journal of Philosophy 93:164-85. Perelman, Ch. (1982) The Realm of Rhetoric. University of Notre Dame Press. Perelman, Ch., and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca (1969) The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation, trans. J. Wilkinson and P. Weaver. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press. Pinto, R & H. Hansen (1995) Fallacies. Penn State. Richards, J. (2008) Rhetoric, Routledge. Richards, I.A. (1936). The Philosophy of Rhetoric. Oxford. Roque, G. “Should Visual Arguments be Propositional in Order to be Arguments?”; Argumentation Tindale, C. (2015) “On Cognitive Environments,” Toulmin, S. (1958) The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press. Walton, D. (1995) A Pragmatic Theory of Fallacy. Alabama. Walton, D., and C. Reed, “Argumentation Schemes and Defeasible Inferences” 4 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Companion to Rhetoric and Rhetorical Criticism
    A COMPANION TO RHETORIC AND RHETORICAL CRITICISM Walter Jost Wendy Olmsted, Editors Blackwell Publishing Jost/A Companion to Rhetoric and Rhetorical Criticism Final Proof 21.11.2003 5:55pm page iii ACOMPANIONTO RHETORIC AND RHETORICAL CRITICISM Edited by Walter Jost and Wendy Olmsted Jost/A Companion to Rhetoric and Rhetorical Criticism Final Proof 21.11.2003 5:55pm page iv ß 2004 by Blackwell Publishing Ltd except for editorial material and organization ß 2004 by Walter Jost and Wendy Olmsted 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148-5020, USA 108 Cowley Road, Oxford OX4 1JF, UK 550 Swanston Street, Carlton, Victoria 3053, Australia The right of Walter Jost and Wendy Olmsted to be identified as the Authors of the Editorial Material in this Work has been asserted in accordance with the UK Copyright, Designs, and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as permitted by the UK Copyright, Designs, and Patents Act 1988, without the prior permission of the publisher. First published 2004 by Blackwell Publishing Ltd Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A companion to rhetoric and rhetorical criticism / edited by Walter Jost and Wendy Olmsted. p. cm. – (Blackwell companions to literature and culture) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1-4051-0112-1 (alk. paper) 1. Rhetoric. 2. Criticism. 3. Rhetorical criticism. I. Jost, Walter, 1951–II. Olmsted, Wendy, 1943–III. Series. PN187.C65 2004 808’.042–dc21 2003012194 A catalogue record for this title is available from the British Library.
    [Show full text]
  • Rhetorically Speaking
    Rhetorically Speaking In his acceptance speech for the German Booksellers‘ Peace Prize, awarded a few weeks before he was elected President of Czechoslovakia, Vaclav Havel talked about the power of language, warning that ―the power of words is neither unambiguous nor clear cut…Words that electrify society with their freedom and truthfulness are matched by words that mesmerize, deceive, inflame, madden, beguile….‖ He asked, ―What is the true vocation of the intellectual? …to listen careful to words—to the words of the powerful—to be watchful of them…to proclaim their implications.‖ Although primarily addressing the need to be alert to the rhetoric of those in positions of power, Havel‘s word also point to the task before teachers and students of English. What the AP English Language and Composition Examination asks for students to evaluate words—words they are to read carefully, interpret, and then ―proclaim their implications.‖ Preparing for this examination is preparing to be continually attuned to what words say and how they say it, and to be able to respond to them with an informed, critical intelligence. AP English Language and Composition Free Response Scoring Guide with Multiple-Choice Section, 1996 Whatever you say. Or whatever you write. Or whatever you do to get your point across. That is rhetoric. And, as the 15-or-so freshmen in English Professor Richard Enos‘ Freshmen Seminar discover, that‘s the art between thought and expression. Was Bill Clinton‘s A Man From Hope a folksy documentary or propaganda pushing small-town values just in time for the 1990 election? And how on earth did Orson Welles‘ 1939 radio adaptation of War of the Worlds cause people to jump from buildings and the government to prohibit similar broadcasts? By semester‘s end, Enos‘ students will be disarming such arguments like a S.W.A.T.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rhetoric of Influence: Models for User-Centered Collaboration
    The Rhetoric of Influence: Models for User-Centered Collaboration Uday Gajendar UI Design Group, Oracle Corp. 500 Oracle Parkway Redwood Shores, CA 94065 USA +1 650 506 3643 [email protected] ABSTRACT UCD experts leverage their high-level view of a problem in The goal of this paper is to suggest rhetorical strategies for discussions with others from differing (yet complementary) influencing stakeholders in a user-centered collaborative disciplines? Perhaps we should consider a step beyond process. I propose rhetoric as a guide to framing UCD, towards the art of rhetoric. interdisciplinary dialogue, thus empowering designers as RHETORICAL MODELS agents for positive change. Two ideas from scholars of Rhetoric is commonly seen as sly doubletalk by politicians rhetoric are offered: the rhetorical stance and rhetorical and scheming salespeople. Beyond this negative meaning, situation. What emerges is the theme of communication rhetoric is in fact a Classical art originating 2,500 years informing successful design practice. ago, formalized by Aristotle in a treatise to become a Keywords practical discipline devoted to studying and performing Rhetoric, user-centered design, influence, persuasion persuasive public speech [4]. As a situated “art of communication”, rhetoric offers strategies to shape INTRODUCTION people’s actions and thoughts with language [4]. Two A colleague likes to tell me that design is the easy part, but scholars offer particular models that bear upon product the hard part is convincing the right people to implement development process— Wayne Booth with his “rhetorical the recommendations. I’d like to suggest that persuading stance” and Lloyd Bitzer with his “rhetorical situation”.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethos: a Survey from Classical Rhetoric
    ETHOS: A SURVEY FROM CLASSICAL RHETORIC THROUGH DECONSTRUCTION BY MICHAEL A. CRONIN Bachelor of Science Northeast Missouri State University Kirksville, Missouri 1978 Master of Arts Northeast Missouri State University Kirksville, Missouri 1979 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY July,1995 OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY ETHOS: A SURVEY FROM CLASSICAL RHETORIC THROUGH DECONSTRUCTION Thesis Approved: ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This dissertation would not exist without the encouragement and guidance of Dr. William H. Pixton. If any of us are lucky enough to complete our education having one good teacher, we are truly fortunate. I found in August of 1979 one such teacher--Dr. Pixton--and I hope to follow in his footsteps, stumbling no doubt in the effort, but better off for having tried it. To him I dedicate this work. I am also indebted to the ceaseless efforts of Professors Batteiger, Rollins, and Bass--fine men all--who each in his own way gave me help. Dr. Batteiger introduced me to the scholarship of rhetoric; Dr. Rollins taught me how to tough it out, to stand tall under fire; and Dr. Bass showed me the expertise of a distinguished educator. Also, I would like to thank Northern Oklahoma College, which supported me beyond the call of duty in this endeavor. Without Doris, Ron, and Joe, I would have had neither the time nor the money to iii pursue this task. Without Debbie--my coach and colleague--the hum of technology would remain forever silent.
    [Show full text]
  • Rhetorical Strategies: Any Device Used to Analyze the Interplay Between a Writer/Speaker, a Specific Audience, and a Particular Purpose
    RHETORICAL STRATEGIES: ANY DEVICE USED TO ANALYZE THE INTERPLAY BETWEEN A WRITER/SPEAKER, A SPECIFIC AUDIENCE, AND A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. 1. Abstract diction: (compare to concrete diction) Abstract diction refers to words that describe concepts rather than concrete images (ideas and qualities rather than observable or specific things, people, or places.) These words do not appeal imaginatively to the reader's senses. Abstract words create no "mental picture" or any other imagined sensations for readers. Abstract words include: Love, Hate, Feelings, Emotions, Temptation, Peace, Seclusion, Alienation, Politics, Rights, Freedom, Intelligence, Attitudes, Progress, Guilt, etc. Try to create a mental picture of "love." Do you picture a couple holding hands, a child hugging a mother, roses and valentines? These are not "love." Instead, they are concrete objects you associate with love. Because it is an abstraction, the word "love" itself does not imaginatively appeal to the reader's senses. "Ralph and Jane have experienced difficulties in their lives, and both have developed bad attitudes because of these difficulties. They have now set goals to surmount these problems, although the unfortunate consequences of their experiences are still apparent in many everyday situations." 2. Absolutes: an adverbial clause that has a nonfinite verb or no verb at all (the clause is missing “was” or “were” or it is replaced by a verbal, making it dependent). The prisoners marched past, their hands above their heads. (The prisoners marched past. Their hands were above their heads.) The work having been finished, the gardener came to ask for payment. (The work was finished. The gardener came to ask for payment.) “But I knew her sick from the disease that would not go, her legs bunched under the yellow sheets, the bones gone limp as worms.”—Sandra Cisneros, The House on Mango Street “We pretended with our heads thrown back, our arms limp and useless, dangling like the dead.”—Sandra Cisneros, The House on Mango Street 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Taking Rhetoric to Work: a Dramatistic Analysis Of
    TAKING RHETORIC TO WORK: A DRAMATISTIC ANALYSIS OF ORGANIZATIONAL LEADERSHIP IN THE OFFICE A Thesis Submitted to the College of Graduate Studies and Research in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Rhetoric and Organizational Communication University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon By Julian John Demkiw Copyright, Julian Demkiw, December 2010, All Rights Reserved i Permission to Use In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Postgraduate degree from the University of Saskatchewan, I agree that the Libraries of this University may make it freely available for inspection. I further agree that permission for copying of this thesis in any manner, in whole or in part, for scholarly purposes may be granted by the professor or professors who supervised my thesis work or, in their absence, by the Head of the Department or the Dean of the College in which my thesis work was done. It is understood that any copying or publication or use of this thesis or parts thereof for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. It is also understood that due recognition shall be given to me and to the University of Saskatchewan in any scholarly use which may be made of any material in my thesis. Requests for permission to copy or to make other use of material in this dissertation, in whole or in part, should be addressed to: Department Head, Interdisciplinary Studies College of Graduate Studies and Research University of Saskatchewan Room C180 Administration Building 105 Administration Place Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A2 ii Abstract This thesis focuses on ways that rhetorical theory can assist in better understanding the dysfunctions of the modern organizational environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Feeling Numbers: the Rhetoric of Pathos in Visualization
    Feeling Numbers The Rhetoric of Pathos in Visualization SARAH CAMPBELL Feeling Numbers The Rhetoric of Pathos in Visualization Thesis presented by Sarah Campbell To The Department of Art + Design In Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for The Degree of Master of Fine Arts in Information Design + Visualization Advisor: Dietmar Offenhuber Reader: Alberto Cairo Respondent: Pedro Cruz Chair: Nathan Felde Northeastern University Boston, Massachusetts May, 2018 Acknowledgements To my mom and dad, for their never-ending support. To Alex, for being my rock through this journey. To my cohort, for the critiques, laughs, shared pain, and inspiration. To Phelps, for being such an entertaining turtle. Abstract Rhetoric is a powerful tool used to influence and persuade. Due to their inherent subjectivity, data visualizations are a form of communication that employ persuasion techniques. Therefore, the rhetoric of visualizations deserves deeper investigation. Drawing from Aristotle’s three modes of persuasion, this thesis explores the rhetoric of pathos, or appeals to emotion, within data visualizations. In this thesis, I develop a taxonomy of pathos techniques applied to visualizations and empirically measure the emotional effect of pathos techniques that relate to data proximity. This research improves the visualization community’s understanding on how certain design decisions can add meaning and relevance to data. Contents 11 17 37 Introduction Rhetoric and Techniques for Emotional Appeals Appealing to Emotion: in Visualization A Taxonomy Rhetoric Engage Emotional Appeals Humanize in Visualization Personalize 49 73 77/83 Evaluating the Conclusion References Emotional Effect of Proximity Techniques Appendix The Value Proximity Emotion Study Methodology Analysis & Results Discussion Introduction Data and Emotions.
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Rhetoric/Ancient Realities
    California State University, San Bernardino CSUSB ScholarWorks Theses Digitization Project John M. Pfau Library 1988 Modern rhetoric/ancient realities James Walsh Friedenbach Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd-project Part of the Rhetoric Commons Recommended Citation Friedenbach, James Walsh, "Modern rhetoric/ancient realities" (1988). Theses Digitization Project. 346. https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd-project/346 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the John M. Pfau Library at CSUSB ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses Digitization Project by an authorized administrator of CSUSB ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MODERN RHETORIC/ANCIENT REALITIES A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of California State University, San Bernardino In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in English Composition by James Walsh Friedenbach August 1988 MODERN RHETORIG/ANCIENT REALITIES A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of California State University, San Bernardino ;:by;. James Walsh Friedenbach August 1988 Approved by; Ri Axelrod Date Kevin Burne- Labry Kran^r ABSTRACT- . Some theorists of what is called the hew rhetoric cohtend thet classical rhetorid is no longer pertinent to the modern world. In this thesis> contemporary rhetorical perspectiyes, pa:rtiCularly that of thd new rhetoricf are ^ analyzed and a five-part description of a rhetoric that ? reconciles the cdntemporary perspectives and the classical traditiort is proposed—-that is, that rhetoric is dialogue, that it addresses the whole person, that it is productive, that it is metaphbrical, and that it is ethical. It is maintained that the purported estrangement between our rhetbric and that of Our traditions is more specious than real/that the classical tradition is still relevant to a contemporary rhetoric that is humanistically conceived.
    [Show full text]
  • Open the Entire Book: 2 Mb
    RAY Style: An Introduction to History, Theory, Research, and Pedagogy conducts an in-depth investigation into the long and complex evolution of style in the study of rhetoric and writing. The theories, research methods, and pedagogies covered here offer a conception of style as more than deco- ration or correctness—views that are still prevalent in many college settings STYLE as well as in public discourse. The book begins by tracing origins of style in sophistic-era Greece, moving from there to alternative and non-Western AN INTRODUCTION TO rhetorical traditions, showing style as always inventive and even at times sub- versive. Although devalued in subsequent periods, including the twentieth HISTORY, THEORY, century, contemporary views now urge for renewed attention to the schol- arly and pedagogical possibilities of style as experimentation and risk, rather RESEARCH, AND PEDAGOGY than as safety and conformity. These contemporary views include work in STYLE areas of rhetoric and composition, such as basic writing, language difference, digital and multimodal discourse, feminist rhetorics, and rhetorical grammar. Later chapters in this book also explore a variety of disciplines and research methods—sociolinguistics and dialectology, literary and rhetorical stylistics, discourse and conversation analysis, and World Englishes. Finally, teachers and students will appreciate a final chapter that explains practical teaching methods, provides ideas for assignments and activities, and surveys textbooks that promote a rhetorical stance toward style. BRIAN RAY is Assistant Professor of English and composition program coor- dinator at the University of Nebraska at Kearney. His work on style and lan- guage issues has appeared in Rhetoric Review, Composition Studies, Computers and Composition, and the Journal of Basic Writing.
    [Show full text]
  • Rhetorical Composition Skills (Literary); Curriculum Instruction
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 095 548 CS 201 495 AUTHOR Dauterimn, Philip TITLE The Teaching of Composition: Rhetorical Perspectives. PUB DATE Aug 72 NOTE 115p. EDRS PRICE MF-$0.75 HC-$10.20 PLUS POSTAGE DESCRIPTORS College Freshmen; *Composition (Literary); Composition Skills (Literary); Curriculum Development; Educational History; *English Instruction; *Literary History; *Rhetoric; *Teacher Education: Written Language ABSTRACT Prepared at the University of Guam, this me.nual for preservice and inservice English teachers focuses on the background and theory of written composition and on rhetoric in a broad sense. It is divided into the following chapters: "Introduction," which covers definition and departments; "Composition and Rhetoric--A History"; "Arrangement," which concerns the ordering of discrete elements within a discourse; "Invention," which deals with the discovery of information and concepts and the formation of Relationships "Style," which embraces the techniques of framing effective sentences; "Issues in Written Composition," which presents various theories that are reflected in freshman composition courses and in the methodology of teaching the subject; and "Composition and the Curriculum," which examines trends, teacher training, teachers, views on composition, English projects, and the Anglo-American conference. (SW) U S °EPA'? 'WENT OF HEALTH. E DUCA ION I. WELFARE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION 'THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRO DUFFO EXACTLY AS RECEIVED FROM THE PERSON OR ORGANIZATION ORIGIN ATING IT POIA S OF VIEW Ok OPINIONS STATED
    [Show full text]
  • Rhetoric & Religion in the Scottish
    THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA “The Sweetness of the Lips Increaseth Learning”: Rhetoric & Religion in the Scottish Formation of English Studies A DISSERTATION Submitted to the Faculty of the Department of English School of Arts and Sciences Of The Catholic University of America In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree Doctor of Philosophy By Megan A. Caughron Washington, D.C. 2011 “The Sweetness of the Lips Increaseth Learning”: Rhetoric & Religion in the Scottish Formation of English Studies Megan A. Caughron, Ph.D. Director: Stephen McKenna, Ph.D. Two of the most important English-language texts of the eighteenth century were George Campbell’s Philosophy of Rhetoric (1776) and Hugh Blair’s Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles Lettres (1783). Campbell was principal of Marischal College and a founding member of the Aberdeen Philosophical Society; he was also an ordained Presbyterian minister and taught future ministers, wrote an important defense of Christianity, and considered his translation of the Gospels to be his most important work. Blair was the first Regius Professor of Rhetoric and Belles Lettres at the University of Edinburgh; he also taught future ministers, was pastor of the prestigious St. Giles High Church in Edinburgh, and first established his literary reputation with publication of his sermons. Much scholarship on their rhetorical theories has focused on the influence of contemporary philosophical ideas, political circumstances, and the “Scottish Enlightenment.” The influence of religion, however, has attracted surprisingly little attention. This dissertation contributes to the understanding and assessment of Scottish Enlightenment rhetorical theory by demonstrating important connections and interactions between eighteenth-century Scottish Christianity and the “enlightened” rhetorical theories of Campbell and Blair.
    [Show full text]
  • HIS PRICE HF01/PC0:Plus Postage
    0001011111.020001 ND 173 864 CS 20S 060 AUTHOR ,Noodson; Linda TITLE A Handbook of Noaern Rhetorical 7eFms. INETITOTICN National Council of Teachers of English, Urbane, PUS DAZE 79 MOTE 84p.; A number of pages tly not reproduce well iue to light type AVAIL AELEIRONNational Council of Teachers of English, 1111 Kenyon Road, Urbana, Illinois 61801(Stock No. 20199, 83.10 non- melter, $3.00 member) HIS PRICE HF01/PC0:Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS ,Classification; ',Composition (Literary) ; Definitions; *Rhetoric; *Vocabulary ABSTRACT Representing an effort to bring together the many words that have been added to rhetoric and composition in this century, this compilation of terms vas drawn from textbooks, theoretical studies, pedagogical and curricular explorations, and practical studies. ?he listing is alphabetical and includes priearilf twentieth century words, but it also contains several classicalterms that are still vide,,ly used. Each term is followed bya definition, Aoften in the wards of its originator. A bibliograhical referenceis cited for the first Use of the word or for its principaluse in composition; this is often followed by a quotation showing the ,vord in context. In addition, other biblicgcaphical references that indicate any changes or extensions in meaning the word alf have undergone are included. An appendix classifyirg the 'words according to sublsct heading and an index of names of authors cited in the definitions are provided. (FL) *********************************************************************** ,Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the.beet that can be made . * from the original document. *********************************************************************** 40 A Halidbook of Modern Rhetorical Terms 1.111 V OSPANTINGIITINT NUM. INKATION WOUTAII NATIONAT. OP 11810CATNIN 00CUATO NT NAS Mad.
    [Show full text]