The Alternative Für Deutschland, Collective Memory, and Populism As a Repertoire
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Constructing ‘the People’ and the Past: The Alternative für Deutschland, Collective Memory, and Populism as a Repertoire by Andrew Edwin Prosser Bachelor of Arts (Honours), University of Waterloo, 2017 A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS in the Department of Political Science University of Victoria ©Andrew Edwin Prosser, 2018 University of Victoria All rights reserved. This thesis may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without the permission of the author. ii Constructing ‘the People’ and the Past: The Alternative für Deutschland, Collective Memory, and Populism as a Repertoire By Andrew Edwin Prosser Bachelor of Arts (Honours), University of Waterloo, 2017 Supervisory Committee: Dr. Avigail Eisenberg, Co-Supervisor Department of Political Science Dr. Oliver Schmidtke, Co-Supervisor Department of Political Science, Centre for Global Studies iii Abstract Populism is a key, albeit ambiguous, feature of the contemporary political landscape. Prevalent conceptualizations of ‘populism’ are not analytically useful in understanding the nature of the phenomenon; such conceptualizations are useful for identifying populist actors, rather than revealing the specificity of populism. Conventional conceptions of populism do not adequately address the core feature of populism: the construction of ‘the people’ against ‘the elite.’ The thesis argues that conceptualizing populism as a ‘discursive repertoire’ accounts for how populists construct ‘the people’ in practice through identity politics. The thesis tests the efficacy of this approach through a discourse-historical analysis of a ‘hard’ case of populism, the Alternative für Deutschland (AfD), and focuses on how the AfD constructs ‘the people’ through the identity politics of collective memory. The analysis revealed that the AfD uses collective memory to establish continuity between ‘the people’ and the past in ethnocultural terms while simultaneously transcending ethnocultural nationhood by invoking ‘the people’ in the immediate through direct action. Thus, the populist invocation of 'the people' is temporally complex. Therefore, conceptualizing populism as a repertoire reveals the specificity of populist identity politics and, more specifically, the populist use of history. iv Table of Contents Supervisory Committee ................................................................................................................ ii Abstract ......................................................................................................................................... iii Table of Contents ......................................................................................................................... iv List of Tables ..................................................................................................................................v Acknowledgments ........................................................................................................................ vi Dedication .................................................................................................................................... vii Introduction ....................................................................................................................................1 The Limitations of ‘Populism’: Literature Review ..............................................................2 Research Question, Case Study, and Argument ..................................................................5 Outline of Thesis ..................................................................................................................8 Chapter 1: Discourse, Populism, and Collective Memory .......................................................11 Discourse-Historical Approach ..........................................................................................11 Populism as a Repertoire and the DHA .............................................................................13 Theorizing the ‘National-Populist’ Conjuncture ...............................................................15 Identity and the Politics of Collective Memory .................................................................19 Methods and Conclusion....................................................................................................24 Chapter 2: Remembering Germany’s “Two Dictatorships” ...................................................27 German National Identity After National Socialism: Literature Review ..........................27 German Memory Politics and the Faces of the Nation ......................................................30 Conclusion .........................................................................................................................50 Chapter 3: Merkel and the Construction of the Anti-Populist Frontier ................................52 Angela Merkel’s German Identity: Unity, Europe, and Responsibility .............................53 Anti-Populism in the German Context ..............................................................................62 Conclusion .........................................................................................................................65 Chapter 4: Populism as a Discursive Repertoire: A Discourse Analysis of the AfD .............67 The AfD as “Competition Populist” ..................................................................................67 The AfD, PEGIDA, and the European Migrant Crisis ......................................................69 Research Design.................................................................................................................72 Findings: The AfD and the Populist Repertoire ................................................................72 Discussion and Conclusion ................................................................................................98 Conclusion: ‘The People’ and the Past ....................................................................................102 The Temporal Complexity of ‘The People’ .....................................................................103 Populism as a Repertoire .................................................................................................106 Avenues for Future Research ...........................................................................................109 References ...................................................................................................................................111 Appendix: AfD Discourse Analysis Codebook ........................................................................142 v List of Tables Table 1: The Function of Elements of Discursive Repertoire and their Historical Reference Points .............................................................................................................................................73 vi Acknowledgments Firstly, I would like to thank the University of Victoria and the Department of Political Science. Specifically, I would like to thank Joanne Denton. I am also thankful for the various funding opportunities I have received through Teaching Assistantships, Research Assistantships, and Graduate Scholarships. This thesis would not have been possible without the support and guidance of my two supervisors, Avigail Eisenberg, and Oliver Schmidtke. I am grateful for Dr. Eisenberg’s endless patience with me. Her incredible abilities to ask deep questions and to boil down my muddled thoughts into something coherent fundamentally shaped this thesis. Most importantly, I am thankful for Dr. Eisenberg’s frequent encouragement to find my voice. In the same vein, I am deeply indebted to Dr. Schmidtke whose insights into German history and politics were a constant source of inspiration. Additionally, Dr. Schmidtke’s comments throughout the writing process were invaluable in thinking through the difficulties of writing and thinking. I am very fortunate to have had the opportunity to work with such caring, attentive, and supportive supervisors. I am incredibly grateful to be part of such a supportive cohort. Completing my thesis in the company of such unique and bright individuals broadened my academic horizons and, more importantly, encouraged me in all situations. I’d also like to thank my friends and interlocutors from various walks of my life, each of whom has contributed to this thesis in some way. I am deeply indebted to my friends and professors from the University of Waterloo, Cam Hale, Sam Nolan, Phoenicia Kempel, Dr. William Coleman, and Dr. John Jaworsky. I’d also like to thank my dear friends Justine Bochenek, Luke Travers, Sarah Fleck, Dale Wilson, and Ashley Jeffries. The importance of your friendship in my life cannot be overstated. I’d be remiss if I did not acknowledge the cats in my life. I’d like to thank the best one- eared cat in the world, Topaz. Thank you for your cuddles, head butts, and naps, and for allowing me to make your food. I’d also like to thank the best polydactyl cat in the world, Mumford. Thank you for giving me a thumbs-up and watching movies with me. It is difficult to imagine how I would’ve made it through this thesis, let alone my time at grad school, without my best friend and partner, Lauren Yawney. You were there for me through all the stressful times and the times when I felt inadequate and unconfident. For that, I am forever thankful. Your constant support, encouraging