Notes and References
Notes and References 1 Blake Studies: A Critiul Survey 1. Bakhtin, Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences', in Speech Gellres lind Otller Late Essays, ed. by Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist (Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press, 1986), p. 170. 2. 'Blake' (1920), rep. in T.S. Eliot: Selected Prose, ed. by John Haywood (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1965), pp. 159--62 (p. 162). For a rather different treatment of this issue see Nelson Hilton, 'Blake and the Apocalypse of the Canon', Modern LAnguage Studies, 16, 1 (Winter 1988),134-49. 3. Some of these deficiencies are being remedied by writers whose work I shall discuss laler, the following are especiall y valuable: Jon Mee, Dangerolls Enthusiasm: William Blakt~ and the Cull un! of Radi calism in the 1790s (Ox ford : Clarendon Press, 1992); David Worrall, Radical Culture; Discourse, Resistance and Surveillance, 1790-1820 (Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1992) and E.P. Thompson, Witness Against the Beast: William Blake and the Moral LIIW (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993). 4. 'Toward a Methodology', p. 170. 5. A good sense of the scope of this debate can be found in the 44 works (89 vols) reprinted in the series, 'The Feminist Controversy in England, 1788-1810', ed. by Gina Luria (New York and lon don: Garland Publishing Inc, 1974). See too, Women, the Fllmily lind Freedom: The: Debate in Documents, Vol. I 1750-1880, ed. by Susan Groag Bell and Karen M. Offen (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1983). 6. Valentin Nikolayevich Volo~inov, Marxism olld the Philosophy of LoII gZloge (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1986), p.
[Show full text]