Energy, the World Economy, and Peak

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Energy, the World Economy, and Peak Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Overview Peak Oil and Health Conference • Energy, Economy, Development, and Health • Oil – our master resource Energy, the World Economy, • Peak oil is imminent and Peak Oil • Peak Oil’s challenges • Options for response March 12, 2009 • Two Big Problems Stuart Chaitkin • Suggested Next Steps: New Energy Regime Senior Associate, JHSPH 1 2 Energy and Economy Energy, Economy, Development, & Health HDI vs. Energy use per capita, 1999/2000 • Energy use “drives” world economic activity. In modern industrial societies • Economic development generally • Energy is the world’s largest business. requires abundant, inexpensive energy. • But, beyond a certain level, additional energy use per capita tends not to raise • Economies can use energy wisely or poorly. the HDI. – Industrial societies would be wise – U.S.: Energy used per $ of economic activity has to: • conserve energy resources dropped ~ 40% since 1970. Two main reasons: HDI: composite indicator • improve energy efficiency developed by UNDP to • use renewable resources • Shifted from manufacturing to service economy show countries’ relative – Exported manufacturing to places like China, India, Japan For less-developed societies well-being in social as well as economic terms. – “Exported” a lot of energy use • > 1 billion people suffer from energy poverty and the poor health often • Increased end-use energy efficiency of buildings, appliances, associated with that condition. A long and healthy life even cars Access to knowledge • Anticipated economic development is A decent standard of living critically threatened without: – But U.S. energy use (especially of oil) remains quite – available and affordable energy inefficient. resources (particularly oil) 3 HDI = Human Development Index 4 Source: World Energy Assessment, 2004 Update, Part II Oil = World’s Largest Energy Source Energy and Environment World’s Total Use of • Energy exploration, acquisition, and use is Primary Energy 2006 USA China responsible for the largest portion of Energy Source % Quads environmental insults on the world’s Oil 36.4 % 171.7 40.0 % 18.7 % ecosystems. Fossil Coal 86.3% 27.0 % 127.5 22.5 % 70.5 % • Impacts on all our key resource systems: Natural gas 22.9 % 108.0 22.2 % 2.8 % – Land Hydro 6.3 % – Water Nuclear 5.9 % – Air Renewables 1.6 % – Global climate – And our people TOTAL 100 % 472.3 Q 99.9 Q 73.8 Q Quad : 1 quadrillion Btus 5 Source: EIA, International Energy Statistics 6 1 How does the world use its oil? World Oil Use, by sector, 2006 Oil is a Unique Energy Source Share of Sector World Oil • Energy dense Use Transport 60.5% • Storable Industry 9.5% Non-energy use 16.5% • Transportable Other sectors 13.5% Other sectors includes agriculture, commercial, and residential • Versatile From 1973 to 2006, world oil use grew by 55%. Transport sector use of oil grew by 106%. Source: IEA, 2008 Key World Energy Statistics 7 8 Oil is Our Master Resource Oil and the World Economy DIRECT USE • Nearly all economic activity depends directly or indirectly on the • dominant fuel of the USE as a FEEDSTOCK availability of oil . to create hundreds of products: – Imagine reverting back to pre-oil energy sources for: transport sector • Manufacturing – gasoline Petrochemicals • Agriculture - plastics • Transportation – diesel - synthetic fibers – Imagine a world without oil-derived plastics, rubber, etc. – jet fuel - synthetic rubbers • July 2008: world oil production set record high: > 86 million barrels a day • space heating - detergents - chemical fertilizers • Oil prices also hit a record high that month: ~ $147/barrel • power factories, Also: • The world probably spent > $330 billion on oil just in that month. industrial processes - lubricants, pesticides, waxes Annual World Payments for Oil - food additives, pharmaceuticals Price of Oil (per barrel) INDIRECT USE - boat resins, ink dyes, perfumes World Oil Use @ $35 @ $50 @ $100 @ $150 to generate electricity - ethylene (film, garbage bags) 85 mbd $ 1.09 trillion $ 1.55 T $ 3.10 T $ 4.65 T Oil is truly fundamental to the world’s economy. [Cheney, 1999] 9 mbd = million barrels per day World GDP ~ $ 55 trillion 10 U.S. Energy Consumption, in quads U.S. Petroleum Consumption by source & sector, 2007 historically, by sector, mbd Source: Notice the huge growth in oil use in the transport sector. EIA, AER But, what happened in 2008 when oil & gasoline prices spiked and 2007 the financial crisis sent the U.S. economy into a deep recession? Source: EIA, AER 2007 1 quad is a quadrillion (10 15 ) Btus 11 Petroleum demand in the U.S. dropped 6% in 2008 , per API. 12 2 Transport Sector Dominates How Dependent on Oil are the Other U.S. Oil Use Sectors of the U.S. economy? • Oil is also the largest source of energy for the But the 30% of oil used elsewhere is still U.S.’s industrial sector. a large portion of the nation’s energy – Largest oil-consuming industries include: % of U.S. • chemical Oil Use • lumber and wood, paper products • petroleum industry itself Autos 25% Light trucks 18% – Functions for oil in industry include heat, process Transport heat, power, feedstock, and lubrication. 70% sector Heavy trucks 16% Airplanes 6% – Shortages of oil would put pressure on the other fuels that power our industrial sector. Other Transport 5% Everything 30% • Another sector deeply affected: Agriculture else 13 14 Peak Oil is Imminent IEA’s View • World faces continually declining availability of Declining Oil Availability of conventional oil not far in the future. • Average annual observed decline rate worldwide is • International Energy Agency (IEA) warned last currently 6.7% for fields that have passed their November that: production peak. “The world’s energy system is at a crossroads. Current • IEA expects that decline rate to increase to 8.4% global trends in energy supply and consumption are per year in 2030. patently unsustainable – environmentally, economically, socially.” • AEO 2008 Executive Summary ends by saying: – “… it is becoming increasingly apparent that the era “What is need is nothing short of an energy revolution .” of cheap oil is over “ “...the sources of oil to meet rising demand, the cost of – “It is within the power of all governments … to steer producing it and the prices that consumers will need to the world towards a cleaner, cleverer and more pay for it are extremely uncertain , perhaps more than competitive energy system .” ever.” – “… the time to act is now ." Source: IEA Annual Energy Outlook 2008, Executive Summary, p.3, emphasis added 15 Source: IEA AEO 2008 16 The Challenges of Peak Oil So, what are we to do to? Declining Availability Oil shortages Option A. Reduce demand for oil’s services to the economy. Price increases Option B. Substitute other energy sources for Liquid fuels for oil and its conventional oil. shortages potential substitutes But, are substitutes actually available … Demand – In a timely manner ? Destruction – At large enough scale ? – At “acceptable” economic cost and environmental harm ? Economic, Social … to avoid severe economic and societal disruption ? Hardship 17 18 3 Option A. Reduce Demand Option B. Use Substitutes for for Oil’s Services to the Economy Conventional Oil 1) Reduce use of the services that oil provides to the economy • We would need substitutes for each of oil’s versatile uses: – DIRECT USE, INDIRECT USE, FEEDSTOCK USE Direct use – Examples: • transport fuel – huge problem in the U.S. – no quick fix • Drive fewer miles; take fewer flights – gasoline (autos) • Use fewer feedstock products (e.g., plastics, fertilizers, pharmaceuticals) – diesel (trucks) – jet fuel (airplanes) 2) Become more oil-efficient • space heating – relatively small problem in the U.S. – switch to – Use vehicles (cars, planes) that are more fuel-efficient natural gas or electric heating (fueled by?) – Modify industrial processes to be more oil-efficient • powering factories – switch to natural gas or coal ? Not good. But, can we change quickly enough? NOT LIKELY Indirect use – Inertial forces are strong • to generate electricity – not really an issue in the U.S. – Long lead times are needed to replace equipment As a feedstock – Major expenditures and investments are needed • for hundreds of products – what are those substitutes? The current destruction of demand for oil around the world Note – due largely to the intense financial and credit crisis – is not • Easy, cost-effective substitutions have already been made. a healthy model for how we ought to adjust to the expected • Electricity can’t replace oil for all of its uses. reductions in oil availability that peak oil will bring upon us. 19 20 Which Resources Won’t (Easily, Quickly, Cleanly, or Cheaply) The End of Cheap Oil Replace Conventional Oil? “… it is pretty clear that there is not much chance of finding any significant quantity of new cheap oil .” As a LIQUID fuel As non-liquid ENERGY • Coal Unconventional Oil is Not Cheap • Unconventional oil – tar sands (oil sands) • Natural gas “Any new or unconventional oil is going to be expensive .” – oil shale • Nuclear Lord Ron Oxburgh, Former Chairman, Shell • Coal-to-oil • Renewables • Natural gas-to-oil Source: Forward to “The Oil Crunch, Securing the UK’s Energy Future” • Biofuels First report of the UK Industry Taskforce on Peak Oil & Energy Security, 2008. 21 22 Criteria for Sustainable Difficulties with Oil Substitutes Substitute Energy Fuels FIVE CRITERIA FOR SUSTAINABLE ENERGY SOURCES Possible Oil renewable scalable high transportable, storable, ecologically • renewable
Recommended publications
  • Working Paper
    WORKING PAPER The Value of Oil Price Projectiom Nebojsa Nakinnovic Leo SchrattenhoLzer October 1935 IQ-85-68 lnternrtionrl Institute tor -lid System, Anrlyth NOT FOR QUOTATION WITHOUT THE PERMISSION OF THE AUTHORS The Value of Oil Price Projections Nebo jsa Nakicenovic Leo SchrattenhoLzer October 1935 TW-85-68 Working Papers are interim reports on work of the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis and have received only limited review. Views or opinions expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of the Institute or of its National Member Organizations. INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR APPLIED SYSTEMS ANALYSIS 2361 Laxenburg, Austria -ABSTRACT AND SUBXAXY The central theme of this paper is the development of the international price of crude oil. A short overview of oil price his6ry is followed by a discussion of the factors that were responsible for previous, sometimes erratic, changes. We con- clude that these factors are likely to maintain their influence in the future, thus giving the forecasts of oil prices a high uncertainty. This uncertainty is reflected in several reports containing oil price proje[ctions. We argue, therefore, that a question soieiy about future oil prices must remain unanswered. Tnis does not render the efforts to examine the future futile; it simpiy means that the question shouid be rephrased. We offer one possible problem formulation that explicitly accounts for the high uncertainty. This formulation requires that specific policy probiems and options for solving them be specified before oil prices are projected - a condition that does not always hold or, at least, that does not seem to be regarded as important enougn to be described in many reports on oil price studies.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Energy in the 21St Century: a Primer
    U.S. Energy in the 21st Century: A Primer March 16, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R46723 SUMMARY R46723 U.S. Energy in the 21st Century: A Primer March 16, 2021 Since the start of the 21st century, the U.S. energy system has changed tremendously. Technological advances in energy production have driven changes in energy consumption, and Melissa N. Diaz, the United States has moved from being a net importer of most forms of energy to a declining Coordinator importer—and a net exporter in 2019. The United States remains the second largest producer and Analyst in Energy Policy consumer of energy in the world, behind China. Overall energy consumption in the United States has held relatively steady since 2000, while the mix of energy sources has changed. Between 2000 and 2019, consumption of natural gas and renewable energy increased, while oil and nuclear power were relatively flat and coal decreased. In the same period, production of oil, natural gas, and renewables increased, while nuclear power was relatively flat and coal decreased. Overall energy production increased by 42% over the same period. Increases in the production of oil and natural gas are due in part to technological improvements in hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling that have facilitated access to resources in unconventional formations (e.g., shale). U.S. oil production (including natural gas liquids and crude oil) and natural gas production hit record highs in 2019. The United States is the largest producer of natural gas, a net exporter, and the largest consumer. Oil, natural gas, and other liquid fuels depend on a network of over three million miles of pipeline infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Potential Influences on the Prospect of Renewable Energy Development in OPEC Members Hanan Alsadi1 1. Introduction the Global
    1 Potential Influences on the Prospect of Renewable Energy Development in OPEC Members Hanan Alsadi1 1. Introduction The global energy transitioning trend escalates due to the continuous growth of energy consumption and advancing climate change. While the total fossil fuel consumption is increasing twice as fast as the average rate over the last decade, making 70% of the global energy demand, the reckless use of fossil fuel is causing substantial damage to the environment (International Energy Agency, 2018; Šolc, 2013). An effective fix to the problem while dubious is to replace the energy source by alternatives. The renewable energy (RE) offers the most definite prospect for producing clean, sustainable power in substantial quantities, which arouses interest around the world. According to Gielen and Colleagues (2019), the RE’s share of global consumption energy would rise from 15% in 2015 to 63% in 2050. However, if this increasing trend in renewable energies would also prevail among Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), is subject to debate. They all have abundant potential to invest in renewable energy sources. Yet, some of the Middle Eastern and Arab Gulf OPEC members do not have or have a small amount of renewable energy sources. In contrast, other members have significant renewable energy sources. Researchers have studied some aspects of renewable energy and its relationship to the OPEC countries. For example, Wittmann (2013) looked at the potential for transitioning from petroleum exportation to renewable energy exportation among the OPEC countries. Still, Wittmann does not explain any specific transition strategies or plans for the Middle Eastern OPEC countries.
    [Show full text]
  • A Holistic Framework for the Study of Interdependence Between Electricity and Gas Sectors
    November 2015 A holistic framework for the study of interdependence between electricity and gas sectors OIES PAPER: EL 16 Donna Peng Rahmatallah Poudineh The contents of this paper are the authors’ sole responsibility. They do not necessarily represent the views of the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies or any of its members. Copyright © 2015 Oxford Institute for Energy Studies (Registered Charity, No. 286084) This publication may be reproduced in part for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgment of the source is made. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. ISBN 978-1-78467-042-9 A holistic framework for the study of interdependence between electricity and gas sectors i Acknowledgements The authors are thankful to Malcolm Keay, Howard Rogers and Pablo Dueñas for their invaluable comments on the earlier version of this paper. The authors would also like to extend their sincere gratitude to Bassam Fattouh, director of OIES, for his support during this project. A holistic framework for the study of interdependence between electricity and gas sectors ii Contents Acknowledgements .............................................................................................................................. ii Contents ...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Oil
    SYLLABUS PS 399 (CRN 58533): The Politics of Oil Oregon State University, School of Public Policy Spring 2012 (4 credits) Tue & Thur 4-5:50pm, Gilkey 113 Instructor: Tamas Golya Office: Gilkey 300C Office Hours: Tue & Thur 10-11am Phone (during office hours): 541-737-1352 Email: [email protected] “The American Way of Life is not negotiable.” Dick Cheney, Former US Vice President “The species Homo sapiens is not going to become extinct. But the subspecies Petroleum Man most certainly is.” Colin Campbell, Founder of the Association for the Study of Peak Oil Course Description The world’s economic and political developments of the last century played out against the backdrop of a steadily rising supply of energy, especially oil. There are signs that this period of “easy energy” is coming to an end, turning energy into a major economic and political issue in its own right. Peak Oil is a term used by geologists to describe the point in time at which the world’s annual conventional oil production reaches a maximum after which it inevitably declines. Recent evidence suggests that we may pass this peak in this decade. In a broader sense, Peak Oil also stands for the economic, political, and societal effects of a dramatically changing energy supply. These effects will create unprecedented problems, risks and opportunities for policy makers as well as for consumers and businesses. In part due to higher oil prices, the US has begun to catch up to this issue, as evidenced by the founding of a Peak Oil Caucus in the House of Representatives in 2005 and by the demand of former President Bush to find ways to cure “America’s addiction to oil”.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 OUTLOOK for ENERGY: 2018 Outlook Fora Energy: PERSPECTIVE a View to 2040 to 2040
    2019 OUTLOOK FOR ENERGY: 2018 Outlook forA Energy: PERSPECTIVE A View to 2040 TO 2040 David Khemakhem November 20, 2019 The Outlook for Energy includes Exxon Mobil Corporation’s internal estimates of both historical levels and projections of challenging topics such as energy demand, supply, and trends through 2040 based upon internal data and analyses as well as publicly available information from many external sources including the International Energy Agency. Separate from ExxonMobil’s analysis, we include a number of third party scenarios such as the EMF 27 scenarios and the IEA’s Sustainable Development Scenario. Third-party scenarios discussed in this report reflect the modeling assumptions and outputs of their respective authors, not ExxonMobil, and their use and inclusion herein is not an endorsement by ExxonMobil of their likelihood or probability. Work on the Outlook and report was conducted during 2018 and the first half of 2019. The report contains forward looking statements, including projections, targets, expectations, estimates and assumptions of future behaviors. Actual future conditions and results (including energy demand, energy supply, the growth of energy demand and supply, the impact of new technologies, the relative mix of energy across sources, economic sectors and geographic regions, imports and exports of energy) could differ materially due to changes in economic conditions, the ability to scale new technologies on a cost-effective basis, unexpected technological developments, the development of new supply sources, changes in law or government policy, political events, demographic changes and migration patterns, trade patterns, the development and enforcement of global, regional or national mandates, and other ‹#› factors discussed herein and under the heading “Factors Affecting Future Results” in the Investors section of our website at www.exxonmobil.com.
    [Show full text]
  • All-Of-The-Above Energy Strategy As a Path to Sustainable Economic Growth
    THE ALL-OF-THE-ABOVE ENERGY STRATEGY AS A PATH TO SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC GROWTH Updated: July 2014 **Draft** The All-Of-The-Above Energy Strategy as a Path to Sustainable Economic Growth Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................2 I. Introduction: Elements of the All-of-the-Above Energy Strategy ...............................................5 II. The Energy Revolution and the Economic Recovery .................................................................9 The Energy Revolution in Historical Perspective ...................................................................................... 9 GDP, Jobs, and the Trade Deficit ............................................................................................................. 15 Energy Prices, Households, and Manufacturers ..................................................................................... 18 III. The Energy Revolution and Energy Security: A Macroeconomic Perspective ........................... 20 Trends in Oil Import Prices and Shares ................................................................................................... 21 Macroeconomic Channels of Oil Price Shocks ........................................................................................ 22 Empirical Analysis of Energy Price Shocks .............................................................................................. 24 The changing sensitivity of the U.S. economy to oil price
    [Show full text]
  • Intro Pages.Indd
    Strategic Petroleum Reserves for Canada by GordonParkland LaxerInstitute, / UniversityParkland of InstituteAlberta • Octoberand Polaris 2007 Institute Strategic Petroleum Reserves for Canada Strategic Petroleum Reserves for Canada This report was published by Gordon Laxer, Parkland Institute and Polaris Institute January 2008. © All rights reserved. Contents Context: Parkland Institute and Polaris Institute: Canadian Energy Policy Research iii Executive Summary 1 Introduction 4 Canada at Risk 5 Why Strategic Petroleum Reserves? 7 Origins 7 Reasons for Establishing SPRs 8 The U.S. SPR 8 The American SPR - not a solution for Canada 9 International Disruptions: Frequency and Intensity 10 History 12 Oil as a Political Weapon 14 Re-nationalizations and Supply 16 Return of Long-term Contracts 17 Protective Value of SPRs 19 Every Country but Canada 20 Urgent Need for Canadian SPRs 22 OPEC countries dominate Canadian imports 22 Location, Size and Function of Canadian SPRs 23 Size 23 Siting the SPRs 25 Uses of Canadian SPRs 26 Conclusion 27 To obtain additional copies of the report or rights to copy it, please contact: Parkland Institute, University of Alberta 11045 Saskatchewan Drive Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2E1 Phone: (780) 492-8558 Fax: (780) 492-8738 Web site: www.ualberta.ca/parkland E-mail: [email protected] ISBN ???? 3i Parkland Institute • January 2008 Acknowledgements It was a great pleasure to write this report and get almost instant feedback on the first draft from a very knowledgeable and committed “epistemic community” of intellectual activists. Together, we are creating a new paradigm for moving Canada toward energy independence and conservation. The quality of this report was greatly enhanced by the detailed suggestions and analysis of Kjel Oslund, Erin Weir, and John Dillon.
    [Show full text]
  • Spiritually Responsible Investing: Integrating Spiritual Wisdom Into the Everyday Circumstances of Community Life
    Spiritually Responsible Investing: integrating spiritual wisdom into the everyday circumstances of community life. By Stefan Pasti, Founder and Outreach Coordinator The Interfaith Peacebuilding and Community Revitalization (IPCR) Initiative (Marcy-April, 2007) [Note: This paper which was presented (in absentia—by a graduate student there) at the “Faith, Spirituality, and Social Change” (FSSC) Conference held at the University of Winchester, Winchester, United Kindgom, April 14-15, 2007] Contact Information: Stefan Pasti, Founder and Outreach Coordinator The Interfaith Peacebuilding and Community Revitalization (IPCR) Initiative P.O. Box 163 Leesburg, VA 20178 (USA) [email protected] (703) 209-2093 www.ipcri.net Spiritually Responsible Investing: integrating spiritual wisdom into the everyday circumstances of community life. (Introduction) To begin this discussion of Spiritually Responsible Investing, I would like to offer three propositions, and one definition. The first proposition is: There are countless numbers of “things people can do in the everyday circumstances of their lives” which will contribute to peacebuilding, community revitalization, and ecological sustainability efforts, in their own communities and regions—and in other parts of the world. The second proposition is: The ways we “invest” our time, energy, and money have a direct impact on the “ways of earning a living” that are available. The third proposition is: The most advanced societies are the ones which are successful at integrating spiritual wisdom into the
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1: Energy Challenges September 2015 1 Energy Challenges
    QUADRENNIAL TECHNOLOGY REVIEW AN ASSESSMENT OF ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES AND RESEARCH OPPORTUNITIES Chapter 1: Energy Challenges September 2015 1 Energy Challenges Energy is the Engine of the U.S. Economy Quadrennial Technology Review 1 1 Energy Challenges 1.1 Introduction The United States’ energy system, vast in size and increasingly complex, is the engine of the economy. The national energy enterprise has served us well, driving unprecedented economic growth and prosperity and supporting our national security. The U.S. energy system is entering a period of unprecedented change; new technologies, new requirements, and new vulnerabilities are transforming the system. The challenge is to transition to energy systems and technologies that simultaneously address the nation’s most fundamental needs—energy security, economic competitiveness, and environmental responsibility—while providing better energy services. Emerging advanced energy technologies can do much to address these challenges, but further improvements in cost and performance are important.1 Carefully targeted research, development, demonstration, and deployment (RDD&D) are essential to achieving these improvements and enabling us to meet our nation’s energy objectives. This report, the 2015 Quadrennial Technology Review (QTR 2015), examines science and technology RDD&D opportunities across the entire U.S. energy system. It focuses primarily on technologies with commercialization potential in the mid-term and beyond. It frames various tradeoffs that all energy technologies must balance, across such dimensions as diversity and security of supply, cost, environmental impacts, reliability, land use, and materials use. Finally, it provides data and analysis on RDD&D pathways to assist decision makers as they set priorities, subject to budget constraints, to develop more secure, affordable, and sustainable energy services.
    [Show full text]
  • Harmonizing States' Energy Utility Regulation Frameworks and Climate Laws: a Case Study of New York
    FINAL 11/15/20 © COPYRIGHT 2020 BY THE ENERGY BAR ASSOCIATION HARMONIZING STATES’ ENERGY UTILITY REGULATION FRAMEWORKS AND CLIMATE LAWS: A CASE STUDY OF NEW YORK Justin Gundlach and Elizabeth B. Stein*. Synopsis: Several states have recently passed legislation mandating ambi- tious levels of economy-wide greenhouse gas emissions reductions. Maine and New Jersey have each adopted “80 x 50” mandates, meaning that they set 2050 as the deadline for reducing annual emissions by 80% from their level in a benchmark year. Colorado’s mandate calls for a 90% reduction by 2050. California adopted a 40% by 2030 mandate in 2006 (later supplemented by executive orders directing state agencies to aim for “80 x 50” and then net-zero emissions by 2045). New York has adopted the goal of net-zero emissions by 2050, with an underlying an- nual emission reduction mandate of at least 85% below 1990 levels. Massachu- setts resembles New York, but its 2008 legislative mandate both called for an 80% reduction by 2050 and authorized updates by the Secretary of State, who in April 2020 announced a net-zero target for 2050 and mandated a reduction in annual emissions to at least 85% below 1990 levels. More state mandates are likely to be adopted in the coming years by legislatures across the country. While the laws establishing these state mandates authorize agencies to adopt new regulations and, in some cases, create ways to challenge inconsistent agency action, they do not spell out what to do about existing laws that require, authorize, or subsidize the development and use of infrastructure designed to enable the consumption of fossil fuels.
    [Show full text]
  • Networking in the Long Emergency
    Networking in the Long Emergency Barath Raghavan and Justin Ma ICSI and UC Berkeley ABSTRACT scale that is unprecedented in human history. However, network- We explore responses to a scenario in which the severity of a per- ing is the product of an energy-intensive economy and industrial manent energy crisis fundamentally limits our ability to maintain system, and if that economic system faces a sudden and perma- the current-day Internet architecture. In this paper, we review why nent energy shock, then networking must change to adapt. If we this scenario—whose vague outline is known to many but whose wish to preserve the benefits of the Internet, then a crucial oppor- consequences are generally understood only by the scientists who tunity emerges for networking researchers to reevaluate the overall study it—is likely, and articulate the specific impacts that it would research agenda to address the needs of an energy-deprived society. have on network infrastructure and networking research. In light Due to the near-term depletion of oil this scenario is not hypotheti- of this, we propose a concrete research agenda to address the net- cal; it marks the beginning of an era of contraction. working needs of an energy-deprived society. Oil is the foundation of our industrial system—its energy en- ables the creation and transportation of goods and services that were unimaginable a century ago. Unfortunately, we face world- Categories and Subject Descriptors wide oil depletion—an era when oil production declines. Although C.2.1 [Computer-Communication Networks]: Network Archi- it is unknown precisely when this era will begin, recent studies sug- tecture and Design gest it will be underway soon, as we survey later.
    [Show full text]