DOCSLIB.ORG

Upper Deschutes River Basin Prehistory: a Preliminary Examination of Flaked Stone Tools and Debitage

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Michael W. Taggart for the degree of Master of Arts in Interdisciplinary Studies in Anthropology, Anthropology, and Geography presented on April 19, 2002. Title: Upper Deschutes River Basin Prehistory: A Preliminary Examination of Flaked Stone Tools and Debitage. Redacted for Privacy The prehistory of Central Oregon is explored through the examination of six archaeological sites and two isolated finds from the Upper Deschutes River Basin. Inquiry focuses on the land use, mobility, technological organization, and raw material procurement of the aboriginal inhabitants of the area. Archaeological data presented here are augmented with ethnographic accounts to inform interpretations. Eight stone tool assemblages and three debitage assemblages are analyzed in order to characterize technological organization. Diagnostic projectile points recovered from the study sites indicate the area was seasonally utilized prior to the eruption of ancient Mt. Mazama(>6,845BP), and continuing until the Historic period (c. 1850).While there is evidence of human occupation at the study sites dating to between >7,000150 B.P., the range of activities and intensity of occupation varied. Source characterization analysis indicates that eight different Central Oregon obsidian sources are represented at the sites. Results of the lithic analysis are presented in light of past environmental and social phenomena including volcanic eruptions, climate change, and human population movements. Chapter One introduces the key questions that directed the inquiry and defines the theoretical perspective used. Chapter Two describes the modem and ancient environmental context of study area. Topics of discussion include physiography, fauna, vegetation, geology, and climate. Chapter Three introduces the aboriginal inhabitants of the Upper Deschutes River Basin and summarizes past archeological investigations in the area. Hunter-gatherer land use and lithc technology are discussed in Chapter Four. The methods used to collect and analyze the data used in this study are presented in Chapter Five. Chapter Six summarizes the results of the technological lithic analysis and geochemical sourcing. The fmal chapter, Discussion and Conclusions, interprets the results with respect to cultural chronology, site function and distribution, land use and mobility, lithic technology, and raw material procurement. ©Copyright by Michael W. Taggart April19, 2002 All Rights Reserved Master of Arts in Interdisciplinary Studies thesis of Michael W. Taggart presented on April 19. 2002. APPROVED: Redacted for Privacy Major Professor, representing Anthrop'ology Redacted for Privacy Committee Member, representing Anthropology Redacted for Privacy Member, ypresenting Geography Redacted for Privacy Chair f Department of )j,ology Redacted for Privacy Dean of Gradàt'Schoo1 I understand that my thesis will become part of the permanent collection of Oregon State University libraries. My signature below authorizes release of my thesis to any reader upon request. Redacted for Privacy Michael W. Upper Deschutes River Basin Prehistory: A Preliminary Analysis of Flaked Stone Tools and Debitage by Michael W. Taggart A THESIS Submitted to Oregon State University In partial fulfillment of The requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Interdisciplinary Studies Presented April 19, 2002 Commencement June 2003 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Many people have given guidance and support during the design and execution of this project. Some of those I'm indebted to shared their knowledge, others offered inspiration. I am grateful for them all. First of all I would like to thank the good people at the Deschutes National Forest and the Central Oregon Heritage Group. Crescent District Archaeologist, Leslie Hickerson, gave generously of her time and made available the records and artifact collections that were used here. A big thanks also goes out to Paul Claeyssens, Heritage Program Manager for the Forest, who took an interest in this project early on and helped get it off the ground. Scott Goodman, High Desert Area Archaeologist for the BLM, was kind enough to give me access to the COHG GIS database and provided technical support. Dr. Barbara Roth, my Graduate Advisor, provided encouragement and a critical eye that helped to smooth out some of the rough spots in this project. Thanks also to Dr. Roberta Hall for her input and helping to keep me gainfully employed during this process. Craig Skinner and the Northwest Research Obsidian Studies Lab were instrumental in making this happen. The donation of lab services in the form of the 2000 Northwest Research Obsidian Studies Lab Grant was a big help. Thanks. Finally, special thanks go to my parents, Bill and Jackie Taggart. None of this would be possible without them. I love you guys. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. iNTRODUCTION .................................................................... 1 Statement of Problem................................................................4 Theoretical Perspective..............................................................6 2. ENVIRONMENTAL BACKGROUND..........................................11 Physiographic Provinces............................................................13 HighCascades...............................................................13 Northern Great Basin ........................................................ 22 Southern Columbia Plateau................................................27 Fauna..................................................................................28 Holocene Climate and Vegetation.................................................29 3. CULTURAL BACKGROUND....................................................40 Ethnographic Survey.................................................................40 Northern Paiute..............................................................40 Problems Defming Northern Paiute Distribution..............48 Nuniic Origins......................................................50 Molala.........................................................................55 Klarnath.......................................................................57 Archaeology...........................................................................58 Central Oregon Land Use...........................................................59 KlarnathBasin...............................................................61 Upper Deschutes River Basin / High Lava Plains......................62 Previous Archaeology...............................................................63 Initial Occupations of the West.............................................63 TheArchaic..................................................................71 Southern Columbia Plateau.......................................71 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) Eg Period ....................................................... 71 PeriodII.....................................................74 Periodifi...................................................76 Northern Great Basin..............................................78 Initial Archaic.............................................78 EarlyArchaic..............................................80 Middle Archaic............................................81 Late Archaic...............................................84 Middle and Upper Deschutes River Basin......................85 Initial Archaic.............................................86 Early Archaic..............................................87 MiddleArchaic............................................90 LateArchaic...............................................91 The Study Sites...............................................................92 35-KL-528 (Shibikashe)...........................................94 35-KL-878 (Little Butte)..........................................96 35-KL-879 (Jim Bob)..............................................99 35-KL-880 (June Bug).............................................101 35-KL-888 (West Davis Campground).........................103 35-KL-1 111 (East Davis Campground).........................105 Isolates...............................................................110 ISO-2031...................................................110 ISO-2175....................................................110 4. HUNTER GATHERER LAND USE & LITHIC TECHNOLOGY...........112 Hunter Gatherer Research ........................................................... 112 The Forager / Collector Model.....................................................113 Land Use & Mobility in the Great Basin..........................................117 Lithic Technology & Mobility......................................................123 R.aw Material.......................................................124 Curation Concept...................................................128 Measures of Mobility..............................................130 5. METHODOLOGY...................................................................133 DataCollection.......................................................................133 Lithic Analysis........................................................................134 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) Flaked Stone Tools.........................................................135 Projectile Point Typology..........................................138 Western Stemmed...................................................138 Elko...................................................................140
Recommended publications
  • Upper Deschutes River · ·Basin Prehistory

    Upper Deschutes River · ·Basin Prehistory

    Upper Deschutes River · ·Basin Prehistory: A Preliminary Examination of Flaked Stone Tools and Debitage Michael W. Taggart 2002 ·~. ... .. " .. • '·:: ••h> ·';'"' •..,. •.• '11\•.. ...... :f~::.. ·:·. .. ii AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Michael W. Taggart for the degree of Master of Arts in Interdisciplinary Studies in Anthropology. Anthropology. and Geography presented on April 19. 2002. Title: Upper Deschutes River Basin Prehistory: A Preliminary Examination of Flaked Stone Tools and Debitage. The prehistory of Central Oregon is explored through the examination of six archaeological sites and two isolated finds from the Upper Deschutes River Basin. Inquiry focuses on the land use, mobility, technological organization, and raw material procurement of the aboriginal inhabitants of the area. Archaeological data presented here are augmented with ethnographic accounts to inform interpretations. Eight stone tool assemblages and three debitage assemblages are analyzed in order to characterize technological organization. Diagnostic projectile points recovered from the study sites indicate the area was seasonally utilized prior to the eruption of ancient Mt. Mazama (>6,845 BP), and continuing until the Historic period (c. 1850). While there is evidence of human occupation at the study sites dating to between >7,000- 150 B.P., the range of activities and intensity of occupation varied. Source characterization analysis indicates that eight different Central Oregon obsidian sources are represented at the sites. Results of the lithic analysis are presented in light of past environmental and social phenomena including volcanic eruptions, climate change, and human population movements. Chapter One introduces the key questions that directed the inquiry and defines the theoretical perspective used. Chapter Two describes the modem and ancient environmental context of study area.
  • Excavations at Upper Shelter, Elko County, Nevada

    Excavations at Upper Shelter, Elko County, Nevada

    1 BLM LIBRARY LAND MANAGEMENT 88018452 PNC V/ALfrt The SOUTH FORK SH€LT€R SIT€ R€VISIT€D €xcavation at Upper Shelter, €lko County, Nevada Lee Spencer Richard C. Hanes Catherine S. Fowler Stanley Jaynes CULTURAL RESOURCE SERIES No. 1 1987 , . BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT NEVADA CULTURAL RESOURCES SERIES * No. 1 The Pony Express in Central Nevada: Archaeological and Documentary Perspectives. Donald L. Hardesty (1979) . 175 pp. * No. 2 A Cultural Resources Overview of the Carson & Humboldt Sinks, Nevada. James C. Bard, Colin I. Busby and John M. Findlay (1981 ) 214 pp. * No. 3 Prehistory, Ethnohistory, and History of Eastern Nevada: A Cultural Resources Summary of the Elko and Ely Districts. Steven R. James ( 1 981 ) . 387 pp. * No. 4 History of Central Nevada: An Overview of the Battle Mountain District. Martha H. Bowers and Hans Muessing (1982). 209 pp. * No. 5 Cultural Resources Overview of the Carson City District, West Central Nevada. Lorann S.A. Pendleton, Alvin McLane and David Hurst Thomas (1982). Part 1, 306 pp., Part 2, tables. * No. 6 Prehistory and History of the Winnemucca District: A Cultural Resources Literature Overview. Regina C. Smith, Peggy McGuckian Jones, John R. Roney and Kathryn E. Pedrick (1983). 196 pp. * No. 7 Nuvagantu: Nevada Indians Comment on the Intermountain Power Project. Richard W. Stoffle and Henry F. Dobyns. (1983). 2~79 pp. No. 8 Archaeological Data Recovery Associated with the Mt. Hope Project , Eureka County, Nevada^ Charles D. Zeier. (1985). 298 pp. No. 9 Current Status of CRM Archaeology in the Great Basin. C. Melvin Aikens, Editor (1986).
  • DOGAMI Open-File Report O-83-03, Survey of Potential Geothermal

    DOGAMI Open-File Report O-83-03, Survey of Potential Geothermal

    DOE/BP/272 STATE OF OREGON DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY AND MINERAL INDUSTRIES 1005 State Office Building Portland, Oregon 97201 OPEN-FILE REPORT 0-83-3 SURVEY OF POTENTIAL GEOTHERMAL EXPLORATION SITES AT NEWBERRY VOLCANO, DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON 1983 edited by George R. Priest, Beverly F. Vogt, and Gerald L. Black, Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries This work was supported by the Bonneville Power Administration under Cooperative Agreement No. DE-AC79-82BP36734. Governi Board State Geologist Allen P. St·inchfield, Chairman, North Bend Donald A. Hull Donald A. Haagensen, Portland Sidney R. Johnson, Baker Deputy State Geologist John D. Beaulieu NOTICE The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, mark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. NOTICE The Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries is publishing this paper because the subject matter is consistent with the mission of the Department. To facilitate timely distribution of information, this paper ~as not been edited to our usual standards. ii CONTENTS CHAPTER 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY, by George R. Priest 1 Introduction 1 Objectives 1 Methodology 1 Assumptions 2 Conclusions 2 Acknowledgments 4 CHAPTER 2. GEOLOGY OF THE NEWBERRY VOLCANO AREA, DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON, by George R. Priest 5 Introduction . 5 Genera 1 Geo 1 ogy . 5 Results of USGS Drilling Program 10 Geophysical Evidence for a Shallow Intrusive 12 Distribution of Volcanic Centers: Implications for the Lateral Extent of a Silicic Intrusive Body 13 Caldera Geometry: Implications for Depths to Former Magma Chambers .
  • Nevada Archaeological Association Is an ASSOCIATION Incorporated, Non-Profit Organization Registered in &~1F;.)Jj the State of Nevada, and Has No Paid Employees

    Nevada Archaeological Association Is an ASSOCIATION Incorporated, Non-Profit Organization Registered in &~1F;.)Jj the State of Nevada, and Has No Paid Employees

    NEVADA ARCHAEOLOGIST VOLUME 18 2000 " ..- . " ""\, NEVADA ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSOCIA TION (; Membership NEVADA ~/ ARCHAEOLOGICAL /;~~-;~~~) The Nevada Archaeological Association is an ASSOCIATION incorporated, non-profit organization registered in &~1f;.)jj the State of Nevada, and has no paid employees. \,~~;;~j Membership is open to any person signing the d The design for the NAA logo .. ~<>- NAA Code of Ethics who is interested in was adapted by Robert Elston j" \,~ archaeology and its allied sciences, and in the from a Garfield Flat :J conservation of archaeological resources. Requests petroglyph. for membership and dues should be sent to the Membership Chainnan at the address below. Make Neyada Archaeological all checks and money orders payable to the Nevada Association Officers Archaeological Association. Membership cards will be issued on the payment of dues and the President Anne DuBarton 702-434-2740 receipt of a signed Code of Ethics. Active Las Vegas, Nevada members receive subscription to the Nevada Archaeologist and the NAA Newsletter In Situ. Secretary Pat Hicks 702-293-8705 Subscription is by membership only: however, Henderson, Nevada individual or back issues may be purchased separately. Treasurer Oyvind Frock 775-826-8779 Reno, Nevada Dues Editor, Volume 18 Student $5 William G. White Active $12 Las Vegas, Nevada Active Family $15 Supporting $25 Board of Directors Sponsor $50 Patron $100 The Board of Directors of the Nevada Life $500 Archaeological Association is elected annually by Benefactor $1000+ the membership. Board members serve one year terms. The Board of Directors elects the Association's officers from those members elected Future Issues to the Board. The Board of Directors meets five times a year, Twice in March, immediately prior to, Manuscripts submitted for publication in the and immediately following the Annual Meeting, Nevada Archaeologist should follow the style once in June, once in September and once in guide of the January 1992 issue of American December.
  • Richard A. Cowan

    Richard A. Cowan

    THE ARCHAEOLOGY OF BARREL SPRINGS SITE (NV-Pe-104), PERSHING COUNTY, NEVADA by. Richard A. Cowan with ANALYSIS OF FAUNAL REMAINS by David H. Thomas Archaeological Research Facility IDepartment of Anthropology University of California Berkeley, CA. 94720 1972 THE BARREL SPRING SITE (NV-Pe-104) AN OCCUPATION-QUARRY SITE IN NORTHWESTERN NEVADA Richard A. Cowan INTRODUCTION The Barrel Springs excavation and report is the result of the joint co-operation of the Nevada Archeological Survey and the University of Cali- fornia at Berkeley. Discovered by the Howard Mitchells, a family of amateur archeologists, in the spring of 1966, site NV-Pe-104 was test pitted by C. William Clewlow and Richard A. Cowan in July, 1966, as part of a program of archeological reconnaissance in the Black Rock Desert for the University of California at Berkeley. For seven weeks in June and July, 1967, Cowan conducted extensive excavations at Barrel Springs for the Nevada Archeologi- cal Survey. This paper is the report of both seasons' work. Many people have aided in the excavation of site NV-Pe-104 and the preparation of this report. At Barrel Springs, the Ben Constant family, our landlords for both the site and our camp, were helpful and co-operative in every possible way, and the Howard Mitchells, the other Barrel Springs family, were excellent neighbors. Thanks are also due to Ethel Hesterlee for setting up camp for both field parties, to Joan Moll for cooking in 1967, to Eldridge Nash for surveying both in 1966 and 1967, and to Hank Chipman for running the bulldozer in 1967.
  • Study Unit PD FS Use Type Reduction Type Blank Type Cortex

    Study Unit PD FS Use Type Reduction Type Blank Type Cortex

    Table 59. Projectile Point Analysis Data, Sand Canyon Pueblo: Manufacturing and Use Data Study Unit PD FS Use Type Reduction Type Blank Type Cortex Reason for Rejection Grinding Wear Fracture Point Type Comments General Site 0 0 8 arrow point finished biface biface thinning absent indeterminate none indeterminate tip medium corner-notched flake (Rosegate, PII) 0 12 atlatl dart finished biface indeterminate absent bending fracture/end none no use wear tip Bajada Stemmed (early shock Archaic) 0 17 indeterminate indeterminate bifacially absent none indeterminate body biface, not further specified questionable as a projectile reduction stage reduced blank point 0 23 atlatl dart finished biface bifacially absent indeterminate none indeterminate blade and tip San Jose (late Archaic) reduced blank 0 43 atlatl dart finished biface bifacially absent impact fracture none retouching of haft and Pinto Stemmed (late reduced blank blade shoulder Archaic) 0 55 atlatl dart indeterminate bifacially absent compound hinge/step none indeterminate projectile point, not further reduction stage reduced blank occurrence specified 0 56 atlatl dart finished biface bifacially absent impact fracture none indeterminate blade Bajada/Pinto Stemmed possibly heat-treated chert reduced blank (Archaic) 0 63 arrow point finished biface indeterminate absent bending fracture/end none retouching of haft and medium corner-notched shock blade shoulder (Rosegate, PII) 0 64 arrow point finished biface bifacially absent indeterminate indeterminate no use wear no fractures medium
  • LA PINE the Newberry National Monument Is Located in the Town Of

    LA PINE the Newberry National Monument Is Located in the Town Of

    LA PINE The Newberry National Monument is located in the town of La Pine. It is just 5 miles north of the Chamber office on Hwy 97. Turn Left (east) and travel up into the crater to enjoy the world’s largest obsidian flow, Paulina Lake and resort and the wonderful little East Lake resort. Both Lakes feature camping, a store, restaurant, boats, fishing, and camping or cab- ins to rent. Paulina is open for the winter, too and you can go into the resort to stay on a snowmobile! This is the one thing in La Pine you do not want to miss! For information about any of the Lava Lands destinations call the Newberry National Monument Hotline number at 541-383-5700. Inside the Caldera: Paulina Creek Water slides. Go on Paulina Lake road to McKay Campground (McKay Crossing Campground) then take the 1-1/2 mile trail to the waterslides. To get to the Hot Springs go to the far end of Little Crater Campground on Paulina Lake and hike on the lakeshore trail approximately 1 mile. You will see the little hot spring pools that people have made through the years. Rosland Campground is located ¼ mile past the Little Deschutes River on Burgess Road (Wickiup turn off from Hwy 97) The little park is a Park District owned park that features a day use area with access to the river, camping and they are remodeling the park to include a new pavilion that is a covered area for your picnics, gatherings and meetings. WEST Places to go within 45 minutes of the Chamber of Commerce in La Pine: 541-536-9771 South Twin Lake/North Twin Lake- Take Huntington Road through town, north to Burgess.
  • Idaho Archaeologist

    Idaho Archaeologist

    ISSN 0893-2271 Volume 41, Number 2 S A I Journal of the Idaho Archaeological Society 2 THE IDAHO ARCHAEOLOGIST Editor MARK G. PLEW, Department of Anthropology, 1910 University Drive, Boise State University, Boise, ID 83725-1950; phone: 208-426-3444; email: [email protected] Editorial Advisory Board........................................................................................................................... KIRK HALFORD, Bureau of Land Management, 1387 S. Vinnell Way, Boise, ID 83709; phone: 208-373-4000; email: [email protected] BONNIE PITBLADO, Department of Anthropology, Dale Hall Tower 521A, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019; phone: 405-325-2490; email: [email protected] KENNETH REID, State Historic Preservation Office, 210 Main Street, Boise, ID 83702; phone: 208-334-3847; email: [email protected] ROBERT SAPPINGTON, Department of Sociology/Anthropology, P.O. Box 441110, Uni- versity of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844-441110; phone: 208-885-6480; email [email protected] MARK WARNER, Department of Sociology/Anthropology, P.O. Box 441110, University of Idaho, Moscow,ID 83844-441110; phone: 208-885-5954;email [email protected] PEI-LIN YU, Department of Anthropology,1910 University Drive, Boise State University, Boise, ID 83725-1950; phone: 208-426-3059; email: [email protected] Scope The Idaho Archaeologist publishes peer reviewed articles, reports, and book reviews. Though the journal’s primary focus is the archeology of Idaho, technical and more theo- retical papers having relevance to issues in Idaho and surrounding areas will be considered. The Idaho Archaeologist is published semi-annually in cooperation with the College of Arts and Sciences, Boise State University as the journal of the Idaho Archaeological Society. Submissions Articles should be submitted online to the Editor at [email protected].
  • Newberry National Volcanic Monument U.S

    Newberry National Volcanic Monument U.S

    Deschutes National Forest Newberry National Volcanic Monument U.S. Forest Service U.S. Department of Agriculture Summer/Fall 2015 Volcanic Vistas Visitor Guide “Frost at Paulina Lake” Photo: A. Jewell EBRATIN EL G Volcanic Wonders… C Yours to Discover! Visiting Newberry National Volcanic Monument allows you to explore Newberry Volcano, YEARS the largest volcano in the Cascade Range. There are extraordinary Volcanic Wonders within the Monument, making it a great place to learn about Central Oregon’s fiery past. Newberry’s erup- tive history began 400,000 years ago and has created massive lava flows covering 1,200 square Newberry’s visitors of yesteryear: stopping by Paulina miles, producing lava tubes, and over 400 cinder cones and volcanic vents during it’s active Peak along old Forest Road 21. periods. The last eruption—just 1,300 years ago—formed the youngest lava flow in Oregon. Welcome! Newberry’s rich cultural history offers many ways for you to connect with those who came before. From the native communities who first crossed this land to the early European and June marks the beginning of a year- American explorers, from the grass-roots led Monument creators to casual visitors today, long celebration of the designation people have marveled at this rugged landscape for thousands of years. of Newberry National Volcanic Monument. Join us to celebrate this The Volcanic Wonders of Newberry National Volcanic Monument offer boundless opportunities remarkable volcanic landscape, its for exploration and recreation… yours to discover! diversity of outstanding recreation opportunities, and its rich cultural Lava Butte rises 500 feet above its history.
  • Macro and Microscopic Lithic Analysis of the Pinto Basin Site Ca-Riv-52 Collection

    Macro and Microscopic Lithic Analysis of the Pinto Basin Site Ca-Riv-52 Collection

    California State University, San Bernardino CSUSB ScholarWorks Electronic Theses, Projects, and Dissertations Office of aduateGr Studies 3-2020 MACRO AND MICROSCOPIC LITHIC ANALYSIS OF THE PINTO BASIN SITE CA-RIV-52 COLLECTION Bernardo Alexander Renteria IV California State University - San Bernardino Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Renteria, Bernardo Alexander IV, "MACRO AND MICROSCOPIC LITHIC ANALYSIS OF THE PINTO BASIN SITE CA-RIV-52 COLLECTION" (2020). Electronic Theses, Projects, and Dissertations. 975. https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd/975 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Office of aduateGr Studies at CSUSB ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses, Projects, and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of CSUSB ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MACRO AND MICROSCOPIC LITHIC ANALYSIS OF THE PINTO BASIN SITE CA-RIV-52 COLLECTION A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of California State University, San Bernardino In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in Applied Archaeology by Bernardo Alexander Renteria IV March 2020 MACRO AND MICROSCOPIC LITHIC ANALYSIS OF THE PINTO BASIN SITE CA-RIV-52 COLLECTION A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of California State University, San Bernardino by Bernardo Alexander Renteria IV March 2020 Approved by: Nicholas P. Jew, Committee Chair, Anthropology Guy D. Hepp, Committee Member, Anthropology © 2020 Bernardo Alex Renteria IV ABSTRACT The San Bernardino County Museum in Redlands, California holds the Pinto Basin archaeological collection. The Pinto Basin assemblage is a legacy collection for the Pinto point and related point types in the Mojave.
  • HYDROLOGY of the NEWBERRY VOLCANO CALDERA, OREGON by Edward A

    HYDROLOGY of the NEWBERRY VOLCANO CALDERA, OREGON by Edward A

    HYDROLOGY OF THE NEWBERRY VOLCANO CALDERA, OREGON by Edward A. Sammel and Robert W. Craig U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water Resources Investigation Report 83-4091 Menlo Park, California 1983 11 CONTENTS Page Abs t r ac t 1 Int roduc t ion 3 Scope and methods of the study 5 Description of the caldera 6 C1 ima t e 8 The hydrologic budget 9 E s t imat i on of t e rms 9 Precipitation 9 Surface-water out flow 10 Evaporation from lake surfaces 13 Ev apo transpirat ion 16 Budget calculation 16 Chemistry of surface and ground water 22 Major ionic constituents 22 Stable isotopes in surface and ground water 29 Temperatures of surface and ground water 33 Discussion of results 36 Re f er ence s 40 T ab 1 e s 4 2 ILLUSTRATIONS Page Figure 1. Sketch map of the caldera at Newberry Volcano 5 2. Stiff diagrams of the major chemical constituents in ground and surface water 22 3. Graphs showing relations between concentrations of selected chemical constituents a. Chloride versus silica 27 b. Bicarbonate versus total major ions less bicarbonate 28 111 ILLUSTRATIONS (CONTINUED) Page Figure 4. Graph showing concentrations of oxygen-18 versus deuterium in ground and surface water 29 5. Map showing temperatures measured on the lake bottom in Paulina and East Lakes 33 TABLES Page Table 1. National Weather Service stations in the vicinity of Newberry Volcano 11 2. Precipitation recorded during selected periods at the Newberry Volcano, Chemult, and Wickiup Dam weather stations 42 3. Measured and estimated discharges, in cubic feet per second, from Paulina Lake to Paulina Creek 12 4.
  • Backside of Newberry Volcano: Glaciers? Lakes? Floods?

    Backside of Newberry Volcano: Glaciers? Lakes? Floods?

    2017 Bretz Club Field Trip The Backside of Newberry Volcano: Glaciers? Lakes? Floods? Leaders: Daniele McKay (OSU-Cascades); Jim O’Connor (USGS); and Robert A. Jensen (US Forest Service, retired) 29 April 2017 121° 30’ 121° 15’ 121° 00’ Bend (3 mi, 5 km) 44° 00’ Major channel Tributary channel Channel filled Deschutes River by lava flow Hwy. 2-920 Badlands olcano CAPS Informal V draw name Rd. 18 Hwy. 97 2-1 Field Trip 2-8 Dry River Canyon Stop 1-3 3-1 1-2 Lava Butte+ Horse Ridge 3-2 ANS EV Lava Top Butte + ORPHAN JUNCTION Mokst + Butte SMITH PILPIL 2-7 Pilpil BROOKS Butte + 3-4 Deschutes River STEARNS 3-3 Tepee Draw Paulina 43° 45’ Cinder + Little Deschutes River Rim Hill MCKAY SCANLON Caldera 2-6 SABOL 2-1 Creek 2-4East POT HOLES CROSSING Paulina2-3 Lake Lake 2-2 Red 2-5 + WICKIUP Hill Paulina + HIXON China Peak +Weasel + Butte CHINAHat HAT East SHEVLIN + La Pine Butte . 97 Finley Cinder y + Butte+ Cone Hw DEVILS HORN Rd. 22 SAND Green + Butte+ Indian Butte SOUTH ICE IPSOOT CHINA HAT 43° 30’ OOSKAN Hwy. 31 0 2 4 6 MILES 0 2 4 6 KILOMETERS Rd. 18 Figure 16. Map showing drainages on Newberry edifice. All paleo drainages are presently dry channels, except Paulina Creek, which drains west from Paulina Lake. Dash-dot lines are paved roads; dotted lines are major unpaved roads. The backside of Newberry Volcano has tantalizing evidence of glaciation, a pluvial lake, and outburst floods. Could all this be true? Could Dry River Canyon have been incised all at once? If you want certain answers to these questions, DON'T COME on this Bretz Club field trip! But if you want to see and discuss some of the perplexing features indicating a vigorous hydrologic system, please do attend.