DOCSLIB.ORG

Upper Deschutes River · ·Basin Prehistory

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Upper Deschutes River · ·Basin Prehistory: A Preliminary Examination of Flaked Stone Tools and Debitage Michael W. Taggart 2002 ·~. ... .. " .. • '·:: ••h> ·';'"' •..,. •.• '11\•.. ...... :f~::.. ·:·. .. ii AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Michael W. Taggart for the degree of Master of Arts in Interdisciplinary Studies in Anthropology. Anthropology. and Geography presented on April 19. 2002. Title: Upper Deschutes River Basin Prehistory: A Preliminary Examination of Flaked Stone Tools and Debitage. The prehistory of Central Oregon is explored through the examination of six archaeological sites and two isolated finds from the Upper Deschutes River Basin. Inquiry focuses on the land use, mobility, technological organization, and raw material procurement of the aboriginal inhabitants of the area. Archaeological data presented here are augmented with ethnographic accounts to inform interpretations. Eight stone tool assemblages and three debitage assemblages are analyzed in order to characterize technological organization. Diagnostic projectile points recovered from the study sites indicate the area was seasonally utilized prior to the eruption of ancient Mt. Mazama (>6,845 BP), and continuing until the Historic period (c. 1850). While there is evidence of human occupation at the study sites dating to between >7,000- 150 B.P., the range of activities and intensity of occupation varied. Source characterization analysis indicates that eight different Central Oregon obsidian sources are represented at the sites. Results of the lithic analysis are presented in light of past environmental and social phenomena including volcanic eruptions, climate change, and human population movements. Chapter One introduces the key questions that directed the inquiry and defines the theoretical perspective used. Chapter Two describes the modem and ancient environmental context of study area. Topics of discussion include physiography, fauna, vegetation, geology, and climate. Chapter Three introduces the aboriginal inhabitants of the Upper Deschutes River Basin and summarizes past archeological investigations in the area. Hunter-gatherer land use and lithe technology are discussed in Chapter Four. The methods used to collect and analyze the data used in this study are presented in Chapter Five. Chapter Six summarizes the results of the technological lithic analysis and geochemical sourcing. The final chapter, Discussion and Conclusions, interprets the results with respect to cultural chronology, site function and distribution, land use and mobility, lithic technology, and raw material procurement. iii ©Copyright by Michael W. Taggart April19, 2002 All Rights Reserved iv Upper Deschutes River Basin Prehistory: A Preliminary Examination of Flaked Stone Tools and Debitage by Michael W. Taggart A THESIS submitted to Oregon State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Interdisciplinary Studies Presented April19, 2002 Commencement June 2002 v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Many people have given guidance and support during the design and execution of this project. Some of those I'm indebted to shared their knowledge, others offered inspiration. I am grateful for them all. First of all I would like to thank the good people at the Deschutes National Forest and the Central Oregon Heritage Group. Crescent District Archaeologist, Leslie Hickerson, gave generously of her time and made available the records and artifact collections that were used here. A big thanks also goes out to Paul Claeyssens, Heritage Program Manager for the Forest, who took an interest in this project early on and helped get it off the ground. Scott Goodman, High Desert Area Archaeologist for the BLM, was kind enough to give me access to the COHG GIS database and provided technical support. Dr. Barbara Roth, my Graduate Advisor, provided encouragement and a critical eye that helped to smooth out some of the rough spots in this project. Thanks also to Dr. Roberta Hall for her input and helping to keep me gainfully employed during this process. Craig Skinner and the Northwest Research Obsidian Studies Lab were instrumental in making this happen. The donation of lab services in the form of the 2000 Northwest Research Obsidian Studies Lab Grant was a big help. Thanks. Finally, special thanks go to my parents, Bill and Jackie Taggart. None of this would be possible without them. I love you guys. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. IN'TRODUCTION ................................................................... 1 Statement of Problem ................................................................ 2 Theoretical Perspective .............................................................. 4 2. EN"IFtONlVIENTAL BACFCCJROUND .......................................... 6 Physiographic Provinces ............................................................ 6 High Cascades ............................................................... 6 Northern CJreat Basin ........................................................ 10 Southern Columbia Plateau ................................................ 12 Fauna .................................................................................. 13 Holocene Climate and "egetation ................................................. 13 3. CULTURAL BACFCCJROUND .................................................... 19 Ethnographic Survey ................................................................. 19 Northern Paiute .............................................................. 19 Problems Defining Northern Paiute Distribution .............. 22 Numic Origins ...................................................... 24 JVfolala .........................................................................25 FClamath ....................................................................... 26 Archaeology ........................................................................... 27 Central Oregon Land Use ........................................................... 27 FClamath Basin ............................................................... 28 Upper Deschutes River Basin I High Lava Plains ...................... 29 Previous Archaeology ............................................................... 29 Initial Occupations of the West ............................................. 29 The Archaic .................................................................. 33 Southern Columbia Plateau ....................................... 33 Period 1...................................................... 33 Period ll ..................................................... 34 Period ill................................................... 35 Northern CJreat Basin .............................................. 36 Initial Archaic ............................................. 36 Early Archaic .............................................. 37 JVfiddle Archaic ............................................. 38 Late Archaic ............................................... 39 vii Middle and Upper Deschutes River Basin ...................... 39 Initial Archaic ............................................. 40 Early Archaic .............................................. 40 Middle Archaic ............................................ 41 Late Archaic ............................................... 42 The Study Sites ............................................................... 44 35-KL-528 (Shibikashe) ........................................... 44 35-KL-878 (Little Butte) .......................................... 45 35-KL-879 (Jim Bob) .............................................. 47 35-KL-880 (June Bug) ............................................. 48 35-KL-888 (West Davis Campground) ......................... 49 35-KL-1111 (East Davis Campground) ......................... 51 Isolates ............................................................... 53 IS0-2031 ................................................... 53 IS0-2175 .................................................... 54 4. HUNTER GATHERER LAND USE & LITHIC TECHNOLOGY ........... 55 Hunter Gatherer Research ........................................................... 55 The Forager I Collector Model. .................................................... 55 Land Use & Mobility in the Great Basin .......................................... 57 Lithic Technology & Mobility ......................................................59 Raw Material ....................................................... 60 Curation Concept ................................................... 62 Measures of Mobility .............................................. 62 5. METHODOLOGY ................................................................... 65 Data Collection ....................................................................... 65 Lithic Analysis ........................................................................ 65 Flaked Stone Tools ......................................................... 66 Projectile Point Typology ..........................................66 Western Stemmed ................................................... 66 Elko ................................................................... 69 Rosegate ..............................................................69 Desert Side-Notched ................................................71 Cottonwood ..........................................................71 Debitage Analysis ........................................................... 71 Technological Classes ......................................................
Recommended publications
  • USGS USGS Geologic Investigations Series I-2569, Pamphlet

    USGS USGS Geologic Investigations Series I-2569, Pamphlet

    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR TO ACCOMPANY MAP I–2569 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEOLOGIC MAP OF UPPER EOCENE TO HOLOCENE VOLCANIC AND RELATED ROCKS OF THE CASCADE RANGE, OREGON By David R. Sherrod and James G. Smith INTRODUCTION volcanic-hosted mineral deposits and even to potential volcanic hazards. Since 1979, Earth scientists of the Geothermal Historically, the regional geology of the Cascade Research Program of the U.S. Geological Survey have Range in Oregon has been interpreted through recon­ carried out multidisciplinary research in the Cascade naissance studies of large areas (for example, Diller, Range. The goal of this research is to understand 1898; Williams, 1916; Callaghan and Buddington, the geology, tectonics, and hydrology of the Cas­ cades in order to characterize and quantify geothermal 1938; Williams, 1942, 1957; Peck and others, 1964). Early studies were hampered by limited access, resource potential. A major goal of the program generally poor exposures, and thick forest cover, which is compilation of a comprehensive geologic map of flourishes in the 100 to 250 cm of annual precipi­ the entire Cascade Range that incorporates modern tation west of the range crest. In addition, age control field studies and that has a unified and internally con­ was scant and limited chiefly to fossil flora. Since sistent explanation. This map is one of three in a series that shows then, access has greatly improved via a well-devel- oped network of logging roads, and isotopic ages— Cascade Range geology by fitting published and mostly potassium-argon (K-Ar)—have gradually solved unpublished mapping into a province-wide scheme some major problems concerning timing of volcan­ of rock units distinguished by composition and age; ism and age of mapped units.
  • Lower Sycan Watershed Analysis

    Lower Sycan Watershed Analysis

    Lower Sycan Watershed Analysis Fremont-Winema National Forest 2005 Lower Sycan River T33S,R12E,S23 Lower Sycan Watershed Analysis Table of Contents INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................... 1 General Watershed Area.....................................................................................................................................2 Geology and Soils.................................................................................................................................................5 Climate..................................................................................................................................................................6 STEP 1. CHARACTERIZATION OF THE WATERSHED ................................................................... 7 I. Watershed and Aquatics.................................................................................................................................7 Soils And Geomorphology...............................................................................................................................................10 Aquatic Habitat ................................................................................................................................................................10 II. Vegetation.....................................................................................................................................................12
  • Volcanic Vistas Discover National Forests in Central Oregon Summer 2009 Celebrating the Re-Opening of Lava Lands Visitor Center Inside

    Volcanic Vistas Discover National Forests in Central Oregon Summer 2009 Celebrating the Re-Opening of Lava Lands Visitor Center Inside

    Volcanic Vistas Discover National Forests in Central Oregon Summer 2009 Celebrating the re-opening of Lava Lands Visitor Center Inside.... Be Safe! 2 LAWRENCE A. CHITWOOD Go To Special Places 3 EXHIBIT HALL Lava Lands Visitor Center 4-5 DEDICATED MAY 30, 2009 Experience Today 6 For a Better Tomorrow 7 The Exhibit Hall at Lava Lands Visitor Center is dedicated in memory of Explore Newberry Volcano 8-9 Larry Chitwood with deep gratitude for his significant contributions enlightening many students of the landscape now and in the future. Forest Restoration 10 Discover the Natural World 11-13 Lawrence A. Chitwood Discovery in the Kids Corner 14 (August 4, 1942 - January 4, 2008) Take the Road Less Traveled 15 Larry was a geologist for the Deschutes National Forest from 1972 until his Get High on Nature 16 retirement in June 2007. Larry was deeply involved in the creation of Newberry National Volcanic Monument and with the exhibits dedicated in 2009 at Lava Lands What's Your Interest? Visitor Center. He was well known throughout the The Deschutes and Ochoco National Forests are a recre- geologic and scientific communities for his enthusiastic support for those wishing ation haven. There are 2.5 million acres of forest including to learn more about Central Oregon. seven wilderness areas comprising 200,000 acres, six rivers, Larry was a gifted storyteller and an ever- 157 lakes and reservoirs, approximately 1,600 miles of trails, flowing source of knowledge. Lava Lands Visitor Center and the unique landscape of Newberry National Volcanic Monument. Explore snow- capped mountains or splash through whitewater rapids; there is something for everyone.
  • Excavations at Upper Shelter, Elko County, Nevada

    Excavations at Upper Shelter, Elko County, Nevada

    1 BLM LIBRARY LAND MANAGEMENT 88018452 PNC V/ALfrt The SOUTH FORK SH€LT€R SIT€ R€VISIT€D €xcavation at Upper Shelter, €lko County, Nevada Lee Spencer Richard C. Hanes Catherine S. Fowler Stanley Jaynes CULTURAL RESOURCE SERIES No. 1 1987 , . BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT NEVADA CULTURAL RESOURCES SERIES * No. 1 The Pony Express in Central Nevada: Archaeological and Documentary Perspectives. Donald L. Hardesty (1979) . 175 pp. * No. 2 A Cultural Resources Overview of the Carson & Humboldt Sinks, Nevada. James C. Bard, Colin I. Busby and John M. Findlay (1981 ) 214 pp. * No. 3 Prehistory, Ethnohistory, and History of Eastern Nevada: A Cultural Resources Summary of the Elko and Ely Districts. Steven R. James ( 1 981 ) . 387 pp. * No. 4 History of Central Nevada: An Overview of the Battle Mountain District. Martha H. Bowers and Hans Muessing (1982). 209 pp. * No. 5 Cultural Resources Overview of the Carson City District, West Central Nevada. Lorann S.A. Pendleton, Alvin McLane and David Hurst Thomas (1982). Part 1, 306 pp., Part 2, tables. * No. 6 Prehistory and History of the Winnemucca District: A Cultural Resources Literature Overview. Regina C. Smith, Peggy McGuckian Jones, John R. Roney and Kathryn E. Pedrick (1983). 196 pp. * No. 7 Nuvagantu: Nevada Indians Comment on the Intermountain Power Project. Richard W. Stoffle and Henry F. Dobyns. (1983). 2~79 pp. No. 8 Archaeological Data Recovery Associated with the Mt. Hope Project , Eureka County, Nevada^ Charles D. Zeier. (1985). 298 pp. No. 9 Current Status of CRM Archaeology in the Great Basin. C. Melvin Aikens, Editor (1986).
  • Chapter 5 Supplemental Planning Sections

    Chapter 5 Supplemental Planning Sections

    Chapter 5 Supplemental Sections Planning Section 5.1 Introduction Background This chapter provides material that supplements the other chapters of the Plan. There are no goals or policies in these sections. Purpose The purpose of this chapter is to provide a glossary, list all acknowledged Goal 5 resources in one location (see Section 2.4) and list all Goal Exceptions and Goal 5 inventories. The final section in this Chapter is a table to track all amendments to this Plan. This table will ensure a clear legislative history is maintained. The following information is covered in this chapter. Glossary and Acronyms (Section 5.2) . Goal 5 Water Resources (Section 5.3) . Goal 5 Wildlife Resources (Section 5.4) . Goal 5 Open Space and Scenic Views and Sites Resources (Section 5.5) . Goal 5 Energy Resources (Section 5.6) . Goal 5 Wilderness, Natural Areas and Recreation Trails (Section 5.7) . Goal 5 Surface Mining Resources (Section 5.8) . Goal 5 Cultural and Historic Resources (Section 5.9) . Goal Exception Statements (Section 5.10) . Goal 5 Adopted Ordinances (Section 5.11) . Ordinance History (Section 5.12) 2 DESCHUTES COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - 2011 CHAPTER 5 SUPPLEMENTAL SECTIONS SECTION 5.1 INTRODUCTION Section 5.2 Glossary and Acronyms Glossary Note: Terms defined in Deschutes County Code 18.04 (Zoning Code) are not repeated here, but have the same meaning as DCC 18.04. “Agricultural-tourism” or “Agri-tourism” means a commercial enterprise at a working farm or ranch, operated in conjunction with the primary farm or ranch use, conducted for the enjoyment and/or education of visitors, that promotes successful agriculture, generates supplemental income for the owner and complies with Oregon Statute and Rule.
  • Celebrating Twenty Years of Conservation Work in the Deschutes Basin

    Celebrating Twenty Years of Conservation Work in the Deschutes Basin

    SUMMER 2016 VOL. 10 NO. 2 NEWSLETTER OF THE DESCHUTES RIVER CONSERVANCY A MESSAGE FROM THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, TOD HEISLER Artist: Susan Luckey Higdon PHOTO: DRC STAFF Celebrating Twenty Years of Conservation Work in the Deschutes Basin Twenty years ago, a small group of District, flows have increased signifi- irrigation purposes, and upstream people came together with a vision cantly below the district’s pumps. from irrigation diversions, so the of leaving our rivers and streams tools we have used in the past will better than they found them. Bend While these reaches have vastly not be enough to solve this complex was on the precipice of a population improved, we still have work to do. and far-reaching problem. boom, and the Deschutes River and Work like this is only possible The solution to restoring the Upper its tributaries had already been over- through building trust and strong allocated for nearly 100 years. Deschutes River lies in the way we relationships. Working with our use and manage water in Central Since 1996, the Deschutes River partners, the DRC has used flow Oregon. Our century old system will Conservancy has brought stakehold- restoration tools such as piping and not meet the changing demands for ers together across the basin to lining canals, water rights leasing, water in our basin. Cities with grow- restore 200 cubic feet per second and instream transfers to make real ing populations are challenged to (cfs) to our rivers. progress in these reaches. meet future water needs. Increased pressure from drought and litigation What does that look like? 20 years After 20 years, an area that has seen practically no restoration is the have created insecurity for commer- ago, Whychus Creek ran dry two out cial farmers who depend on unreli- of every three summers.
  • Nevada Archaeological Association Is an ASSOCIATION Incorporated, Non-Profit Organization Registered in &~1F;.)Jj the State of Nevada, and Has No Paid Employees

    Nevada Archaeological Association Is an ASSOCIATION Incorporated, Non-Profit Organization Registered in &~1F;.)Jj the State of Nevada, and Has No Paid Employees

    NEVADA ARCHAEOLOGIST VOLUME 18 2000 " ..- . " ""\, NEVADA ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSOCIA TION (; Membership NEVADA ~/ ARCHAEOLOGICAL /;~~-;~~~) The Nevada Archaeological Association is an ASSOCIATION incorporated, non-profit organization registered in &~1f;.)jj the State of Nevada, and has no paid employees. \,~~;;~j Membership is open to any person signing the d The design for the NAA logo .. ~<>- NAA Code of Ethics who is interested in was adapted by Robert Elston j" \,~ archaeology and its allied sciences, and in the from a Garfield Flat :J conservation of archaeological resources. Requests petroglyph. for membership and dues should be sent to the Membership Chainnan at the address below. Make Neyada Archaeological all checks and money orders payable to the Nevada Association Officers Archaeological Association. Membership cards will be issued on the payment of dues and the President Anne DuBarton 702-434-2740 receipt of a signed Code of Ethics. Active Las Vegas, Nevada members receive subscription to the Nevada Archaeologist and the NAA Newsletter In Situ. Secretary Pat Hicks 702-293-8705 Subscription is by membership only: however, Henderson, Nevada individual or back issues may be purchased separately. Treasurer Oyvind Frock 775-826-8779 Reno, Nevada Dues Editor, Volume 18 Student $5 William G. White Active $12 Las Vegas, Nevada Active Family $15 Supporting $25 Board of Directors Sponsor $50 Patron $100 The Board of Directors of the Nevada Life $500 Archaeological Association is elected annually by Benefactor $1000+ the membership. Board members serve one year terms. The Board of Directors elects the Association's officers from those members elected Future Issues to the Board. The Board of Directors meets five times a year, Twice in March, immediately prior to, Manuscripts submitted for publication in the and immediately following the Annual Meeting, Nevada Archaeologist should follow the style once in June, once in September and once in guide of the January 1992 issue of American December.
  • Richard A. Cowan

    Richard A. Cowan

    THE ARCHAEOLOGY OF BARREL SPRINGS SITE (NV-Pe-104), PERSHING COUNTY, NEVADA by. Richard A. Cowan with ANALYSIS OF FAUNAL REMAINS by David H. Thomas Archaeological Research Facility IDepartment of Anthropology University of California Berkeley, CA. 94720 1972 THE BARREL SPRING SITE (NV-Pe-104) AN OCCUPATION-QUARRY SITE IN NORTHWESTERN NEVADA Richard A. Cowan INTRODUCTION The Barrel Springs excavation and report is the result of the joint co-operation of the Nevada Archeological Survey and the University of Cali- fornia at Berkeley. Discovered by the Howard Mitchells, a family of amateur archeologists, in the spring of 1966, site NV-Pe-104 was test pitted by C. William Clewlow and Richard A. Cowan in July, 1966, as part of a program of archeological reconnaissance in the Black Rock Desert for the University of California at Berkeley. For seven weeks in June and July, 1967, Cowan conducted extensive excavations at Barrel Springs for the Nevada Archeologi- cal Survey. This paper is the report of both seasons' work. Many people have aided in the excavation of site NV-Pe-104 and the preparation of this report. At Barrel Springs, the Ben Constant family, our landlords for both the site and our camp, were helpful and co-operative in every possible way, and the Howard Mitchells, the other Barrel Springs family, were excellent neighbors. Thanks are also due to Ethel Hesterlee for setting up camp for both field parties, to Joan Moll for cooking in 1967, to Eldridge Nash for surveying both in 1966 and 1967, and to Hank Chipman for running the bulldozer in 1967.
  • Study Unit PD FS Use Type Reduction Type Blank Type Cortex

    Study Unit PD FS Use Type Reduction Type Blank Type Cortex

    Table 59. Projectile Point Analysis Data, Sand Canyon Pueblo: Manufacturing and Use Data Study Unit PD FS Use Type Reduction Type Blank Type Cortex Reason for Rejection Grinding Wear Fracture Point Type Comments General Site 0 0 8 arrow point finished biface biface thinning absent indeterminate none indeterminate tip medium corner-notched flake (Rosegate, PII) 0 12 atlatl dart finished biface indeterminate absent bending fracture/end none no use wear tip Bajada Stemmed (early shock Archaic) 0 17 indeterminate indeterminate bifacially absent none indeterminate body biface, not further specified questionable as a projectile reduction stage reduced blank point 0 23 atlatl dart finished biface bifacially absent indeterminate none indeterminate blade and tip San Jose (late Archaic) reduced blank 0 43 atlatl dart finished biface bifacially absent impact fracture none retouching of haft and Pinto Stemmed (late reduced blank blade shoulder Archaic) 0 55 atlatl dart indeterminate bifacially absent compound hinge/step none indeterminate projectile point, not further reduction stage reduced blank occurrence specified 0 56 atlatl dart finished biface bifacially absent impact fracture none indeterminate blade Bajada/Pinto Stemmed possibly heat-treated chert reduced blank (Archaic) 0 63 arrow point finished biface indeterminate absent bending fracture/end none retouching of haft and medium corner-notched shock blade shoulder (Rosegate, PII) 0 64 arrow point finished biface bifacially absent indeterminate indeterminate no use wear no fractures medium
  • Part II – Reservoir Operations Assessment for Reclamation Tributary Basins

    Part II – Reservoir Operations Assessment for Reclamation Tributary Basins

    Climate and Hydrology Datasets for Use in the RMJOC Agencies’ Longer-Term Planning Studies: Part II – Reservoir Operations Assessment for Reclamation Tributary Basins U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Pacific Northwest Region Boise, Idaho January 2011 U.S. Department of the Interior Mission Statement The mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and provide access to our Nation's natural and cultural heritage and honor our trust responsibilities to Tribes and our commitments to island communities. Mission of the Bureau of Reclamation The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. Photographs on front cover from left to right: Arrowrock Reservoir, Boise River, Idaho; Payette River, Idaho; Yakima Valley, Washington. Climate and Hydrology Datasets for Use in the RMJOC Agencies’ Longer-Term Planning Studies: Part II – Reservoir Operations Assessment for Reclamation Tributary Basins Regional Resource & Technical Services River & Reservoir Operations Report prepared by Toni Turner Pacific Northwest Regional Office, Boise, Idaho And Levi Brekke Technical Service Center, Denver, Colorado U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Pacific Northwest Region Boise, Idaho January 2011 Acknowledgements: RMJOC Sponsors: • Patrick McGrane, Bureau of Reclamation, Pacific Northwest Region • Rick Pendergrass, Bonneville Power Administration • Jim Barton, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Northwestern Division RMJOC Agencies’ Comments and Contributions from: • Bureau of Reclamation, Pacific Northwest Region: Patrick McGrane, Chris Lynch, Jennifer Johnson, Sharon Parkinson, Bob Lounsbury, Ted Day, Carol Kjar, and Lori Postlethwait • Bonneville Power Administration: Rick Pendergrass, Brian Kuepper, Nancy Stephan • U.S.
  • Idaho Archaeologist

    Idaho Archaeologist

    ISSN 0893-2271 Volume 41, Number 2 S A I Journal of the Idaho Archaeological Society 2 THE IDAHO ARCHAEOLOGIST Editor MARK G. PLEW, Department of Anthropology, 1910 University Drive, Boise State University, Boise, ID 83725-1950; phone: 208-426-3444; email: [email protected] Editorial Advisory Board........................................................................................................................... KIRK HALFORD, Bureau of Land Management, 1387 S. Vinnell Way, Boise, ID 83709; phone: 208-373-4000; email: [email protected] BONNIE PITBLADO, Department of Anthropology, Dale Hall Tower 521A, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019; phone: 405-325-2490; email: [email protected] KENNETH REID, State Historic Preservation Office, 210 Main Street, Boise, ID 83702; phone: 208-334-3847; email: [email protected] ROBERT SAPPINGTON, Department of Sociology/Anthropology, P.O. Box 441110, Uni- versity of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844-441110; phone: 208-885-6480; email [email protected] MARK WARNER, Department of Sociology/Anthropology, P.O. Box 441110, University of Idaho, Moscow,ID 83844-441110; phone: 208-885-5954;email [email protected] PEI-LIN YU, Department of Anthropology,1910 University Drive, Boise State University, Boise, ID 83725-1950; phone: 208-426-3059; email: [email protected] Scope The Idaho Archaeologist publishes peer reviewed articles, reports, and book reviews. Though the journal’s primary focus is the archeology of Idaho, technical and more theo- retical papers having relevance to issues in Idaho and surrounding areas will be considered. The Idaho Archaeologist is published semi-annually in cooperation with the College of Arts and Sciences, Boise State University as the journal of the Idaho Archaeological Society. Submissions Articles should be submitted online to the Editor at [email protected].
  • Common Goldeneyes Hatching from Cracked Eggs

    Common Goldeneyes Hatching from Cracked Eggs

    October 1976] General Notes 833 LITERATURE CITED A•rTEVS,E. 1940. Age of artifacts below peat beds in Lower Klamath Lake, Cali- fornia. Carnegie Inst. Washington Year-book 39: 307-309. A•rTEVS,E. 1955. Geologic-climaticdating in the West. Amer. Antiquity 20: 317- 355. CR•SS•AN, L. S., F. C. BAKER,P.S. CONOER,H. P. HANSEN,AND R. F. HEIZER. 1942. Archaeologicalresearches in the northern Great Basin. CarnegieInst. Washington Publ. 538. GR^•:soz%D.K. 1976. The Nightfire Island avifauna and the Altithermal. Pp. 74- 102 in Holocene environmental change in the Great Basin (R. Elston, Ed.). Nevada Archaeol. Surv. Res. Pap. No. 6, Reno, Univ. Nevada. HAZ•S•r, H. P. 1947. Postglacial forest succession,climate and chronology in the Pacific Northwest. Amer. Philos. Soc. Trans. 37. H^z•s•z•,H.P. 1967. Chronologyof postglacialpollen profiles in the Pacific North- west (U.S.A.). Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 4: 103-105. HEUSSER,C. 1966. Pleistoceneclimatic variations in the Western United States. Pp. 9-36 in Pleistocene and post~Pleistoceneclimatic variations in the Pacific area (D. I. Blumenstock,Ed.). Honolulu, B. P. Bishop Mus. Press. MEI•rZER, O.E. 1922. Map of the Pleistocenelakes of the Basin-and-Range Prov- ince and its significance. Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull. 33: 541-552. U.S. D•e^Rxm•rr or T•r• I_WXERIOR.1955. A special report on fish and wildlife re- sourcesaffected by developmentsproposed for the Upper Klamath Basin, Oregon and California. U.S. Fish Wildl. Serv. U.S. DEeARTm•rT Or T•rE I•rTE•IO•. 1958.