DOCSLIB.ORG

Part II – Reservoir Operations Assessment for Reclamation Tributary Basins

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Climate and Hydrology Datasets for Use in the RMJOC Agencies’ Longer-Term Planning Studies: Part II – Reservoir Operations Assessment for Reclamation Tributary Basins U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Pacific Northwest Region Boise, Idaho January 2011 U.S. Department of the Interior Mission Statement The mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and provide access to our Nation's natural and cultural heritage and honor our trust responsibilities to Tribes and our commitments to island communities. Mission of the Bureau of Reclamation The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. Photographs on front cover from left to right: Arrowrock Reservoir, Boise River, Idaho; Payette River, Idaho; Yakima Valley, Washington. Climate and Hydrology Datasets for Use in the RMJOC Agencies’ Longer-Term Planning Studies: Part II – Reservoir Operations Assessment for Reclamation Tributary Basins Regional Resource & Technical Services River & Reservoir Operations Report prepared by Toni Turner Pacific Northwest Regional Office, Boise, Idaho And Levi Brekke Technical Service Center, Denver, Colorado U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Pacific Northwest Region Boise, Idaho January 2011 Acknowledgements: RMJOC Sponsors: • Patrick McGrane, Bureau of Reclamation, Pacific Northwest Region • Rick Pendergrass, Bonneville Power Administration • Jim Barton, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Northwestern Division RMJOC Agencies’ Comments and Contributions from: • Bureau of Reclamation, Pacific Northwest Region: Patrick McGrane, Chris Lynch, Jennifer Johnson, Sharon Parkinson, Bob Lounsbury, Ted Day, Carol Kjar, and Lori Postlethwait • Bonneville Power Administration: Rick Pendergrass, Brian Kuepper, Nancy Stephan • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: Jim Barton, Seshagirir Vaddey, Peter Brooks, Malar Annamalai, Keith Duffy, Joel Fenolio, Patricia Low, Kristian Mickelson, John McCoskery, William Proctor, and Randal Wortman Additional Comments and Contributions from: • Northwest Power and Conservation Council • Columbia River Inter Tribal Fish Commission • BC-Hydro • U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service • NOAA Fisheries Service • University of Washington Climate Impacts Group • Oregon Climate Change Research Institute . Abbreviations and Acronyms BC Bias-corrected BCSD Bias-Correction Spatial Disaggregation BiOp Biological opinion BPA Bonneville Power Administration C Central change scenario C° degrees Celsius cfs cubic feet per second CROO Reclamation Hydromet site for the Crooked River below Opal Springs near Culver, Oregon CSRO USGS gage location on the Crooked River below Opal Springs near Culver, Oregon CULO Reclamation Hydromet site for the Deschutes River near CROO near Culver, Oregon DCCO USGS gage location on the Deschutes River above Lake Billy Chinook at near Culver, Oregon DPL Daily proration level DPM Deschutes Planning Model ENSO El Nino Southern Oscillation ESA Endangered Species Act F° degrees Fahrenheit GCM General Circulation Model HB 2860 Washington State House Bill No. 2860 HD Hybrid-Delta KAF Thousand acre-feet LW/D Less warming and drier LW/W Less warming and wetter LW/W Less warming and wetter MAF Million acre-feet MC Minimal change MW/D More warming and drier MW/W More warming and wetter NOAA Fisheries National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Fisheries Service Service NRNI No regulation, no irrigation O&M Operation and maintenance PARW Reclamation Hydromet site identification of the Yakima River near Parker PRVO The average Bowman Dam release Reclamation U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation RMJOC Reservoir Management Joint Operating Committee SPM Snake Planning Model SWE Snow water equivalent TWSA Total water supply available USACE U.S. Army Corps of Engineers USGS U.S. Geological Survey UW CIG University of Washington Climate Impacts Group VIC Variable Infiltration Capacity model VIC BC Variable Infiltration Capacity model, bias-corrected WY Water year YAPAR NRNI site identification for the Yakima River near Parker YPM Yakima Planning Model Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................ xiii 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 1 2.0 Description of Reservoir Operations by River Subbasin ................................... 4 2.1 Yakima River Subbasin ...................................................................................... 5 2.2 Deschutes River Subbasin .................................................................................. 9 2.3 Snake River Subbasin above Brownlee Reservoir ........................................... 11 2.3.1 Snake River Subbasin .......................................................................... 11 2.3.2 Boise-Payette River Subbasin .............................................................. 12 2.3.3 Southeast Oregon ................................................................................. 14 3.0 Description of Operations Simulation Models and Inputs Adjusted for RMJOC Climate and Hydrology Scenarios ................................................ 16 3.1 Yakima River Subbasin .................................................................................... 16 3.1.1 Yakima Planning Model (RiverWare Application) ............................. 16 3.1.2 Inflow Hydrology ................................................................................. 16 3.1.3 Water Supply Forecasts ....................................................................... 19 3.1.4 ENSO Classifications ........................................................................... 20 3.2 Deschutes River Subbasin ................................................................................ 21 3.2.1 Deschutes Planning Model (MODSIM Application) .......................... 21 3.2.2 Inflow Hydrology ................................................................................. 22 3.2.2.1 Naturalized Flow Hydrology ................................................. 22 3.2.2.2 Modified Flow Hydrology..................................................... 26 3.2.2.2.1 Reclamation Modified Flow Model ..................................................... 26 3.2.2.3 Methods and Adjustments ..................................................... 27 3.2.2.3.1 Methods ................................................................................................ 27 3.2.2.3.2 Adjustments ......................................................................................... 27 3.2.3 Water Supply Forecasts ....................................................................... 28 3.3 Snake River Subbasin above Brownlee Reservoir ........................................... 29 3.3.1 Snake Planning Model (MODSIM Application) ................................. 29 3.3.2 Inflow Hydrology ................................................................................. 30 3.3.2.1 Naturalized Flow Hydrology ................................................. 30 3.3.2.2 Modified Flow Hydrology..................................................... 32 January 2011 – Part II: Reservoir Operations Assessment i 3.3.2.3 Methods and Adjustments ..................................................... 33 3.3.3 Water Supply Forecasts ....................................................................... 33 4.0 Results .............................................................................................................. 34 4.1 Yakima River Subbasin .................................................................................... 36 4.1.1 Typical Conditions under Hybrid-Delta Climates ............................... 37 4.1.2 Variability under Hybrid-Delta Climates ............................................ 52 4.1.3 Effect of Analytical Design Choices on Simulated Operations ............................................................................................ 60 4.1.3.1 Type of Water Supply Forecasting: Perfect versus Imperfect .............................................................................................. 60 4.1.3.2 Type of Future Climate Scenario: Hybrid-Delta (HD) versus Transient .......................................................................... 70 4.1.4 Summary .............................................................................................. 79 4.2 Deschutes River Subbasin ................................................................................ 81 4.2.1 Metrics ................................................................................................. 82 4.2.1.1 Naturalized Model ................................................................. 82 4.2.1.2 Modified Flow Model ........................................................... 82 4.2.1.2.1 Inflow to the Deschutes River System ................................................. 83 4.2.1.2.2 End-of-Month Storage at Major Reservoirs ........................................ 85 4.2.1.2.3 Flow at Key Locations in the River Subbasin ..................................... 85 4.2.1.2.4 Surface Water Delivered ...................................................................... 85 4.2.1.2.5 ESA Environmental Objectives ........................................................... 87 4.2.2 Results .................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Spring Chinook Salmon Dworshak National Fish Hatchery Clearwater River, Idaho

    Spring Chinook Salmon Dworshak National Fish Hatchery Clearwater River, Idaho

    Spring Chinook Salmon Dworshak National Fish Hatchery Clearwater River, Idaho Howard Burge Ray Jones U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Idaho Fishery Resource Office Ahsahka, Idaho Idaho Washington NF Clearwater River Clearwater Lower Hatchery Columbia Lower Little Goose Granite Monumental Dam Dam Dam Dworshak Dam Clearwater R Dworshak Lochsa R River Snake NFH River Lewiston Kooskia IDFG Ice Harbor NFH Satellites Dam Selway River Rapid R Hatchery Hells Canyon Dam Oxbow Dam SF Clearwater McNary Brownlee Dam Dam Oregon Salmon River Program Goals 9,135 adults above Lower Granite Dam Harvest of 36,500 in ocean, Columbia River, and Lower Snake River fisheries Original production goal of 1.4 mil smolts Current production goal of 1.05 mil smolts - changed in 1996 Management Objectives Provide sport & tribal fishing opportunities in the Lower Clearwater River Return adequate broodstock to meet production needs Minimize impacts to natural populations Assist other programs in the Clearwater basin M & E Objectives Evaluate the effectiveness of the program so that it can be managed adaptively Determine the total adult return to assess if the program is meeting its mitigation goals Document and communicate programs success at meeting its program and management goals Coordinate hatchery and R,M & E activities Lewiston Dam 1929-1972 Leavenworth NFH 1983 - 86 Little White NFH 1983 & 85 1989 - 2010 Dworshak NFH Kooskia NFH 1995 Rapid River SH 1987 & 88 Broodstock sources and years Dworshak Spring Chinook Broodstock 50:50 ratio of males to females Approximately 65% of returning adults are 2-ocean Average size of a 2-ocean adult is 29 inches Average pre-spawn mortality (1995-2010) 3.1% Chinook arrive ~ May - August Spawning ~ late Aug - early Sept Juvenile Performance Rearing ~ approx.
  • Upper Deschutes River · ·Basin Prehistory

    Upper Deschutes River · ·Basin Prehistory

    Upper Deschutes River · ·Basin Prehistory: A Preliminary Examination of Flaked Stone Tools and Debitage Michael W. Taggart 2002 ·~. ... .. " .. • '·:: ••h> ·';'"' •..,. •.• '11\•.. ...... :f~::.. ·:·. .. ii AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Michael W. Taggart for the degree of Master of Arts in Interdisciplinary Studies in Anthropology. Anthropology. and Geography presented on April 19. 2002. Title: Upper Deschutes River Basin Prehistory: A Preliminary Examination of Flaked Stone Tools and Debitage. The prehistory of Central Oregon is explored through the examination of six archaeological sites and two isolated finds from the Upper Deschutes River Basin. Inquiry focuses on the land use, mobility, technological organization, and raw material procurement of the aboriginal inhabitants of the area. Archaeological data presented here are augmented with ethnographic accounts to inform interpretations. Eight stone tool assemblages and three debitage assemblages are analyzed in order to characterize technological organization. Diagnostic projectile points recovered from the study sites indicate the area was seasonally utilized prior to the eruption of ancient Mt. Mazama (>6,845 BP), and continuing until the Historic period (c. 1850). While there is evidence of human occupation at the study sites dating to between >7,000- 150 B.P., the range of activities and intensity of occupation varied. Source characterization analysis indicates that eight different Central Oregon obsidian sources are represented at the sites. Results of the lithic analysis are presented in light of past environmental and social phenomena including volcanic eruptions, climate change, and human population movements. Chapter One introduces the key questions that directed the inquiry and defines the theoretical perspective used. Chapter Two describes the modem and ancient environmental context of study area.
  • Hells Canyon Complex Total Dissolved Gas Study

    Hells Canyon Complex Total Dissolved Gas Study

    Hells Canyon Complex Total Dissolved Gas Study Ralph Myers Project Limnologist Sharon E. Parkinson Principal Engineer Technical Report Appendix E.2.2-4 March 2002 Revised July 2003 Hells Canyon Complex FERC No. 1971 Copyright © 2003 by Idaho Power Company Idaho Power Company Hells Canyon Complex Total Dissolved Gas Study TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................. i List of Tables...................................................................................................................................ii List of Figures .................................................................................................................................ii List of Appendices .........................................................................................................................iii Abstract ........................................................................................................................................... 1 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 2 2. Study Area.................................................................................................................................. 3 3. Plant Operations ......................................................................................................................... 4 4. Methods.....................................................................................................................................
  • Volcanic Vistas Discover National Forests in Central Oregon Summer 2009 Celebrating the Re-Opening of Lava Lands Visitor Center Inside

    Volcanic Vistas Discover National Forests in Central Oregon Summer 2009 Celebrating the Re-Opening of Lava Lands Visitor Center Inside

    Volcanic Vistas Discover National Forests in Central Oregon Summer 2009 Celebrating the re-opening of Lava Lands Visitor Center Inside.... Be Safe! 2 LAWRENCE A. CHITWOOD Go To Special Places 3 EXHIBIT HALL Lava Lands Visitor Center 4-5 DEDICATED MAY 30, 2009 Experience Today 6 For a Better Tomorrow 7 The Exhibit Hall at Lava Lands Visitor Center is dedicated in memory of Explore Newberry Volcano 8-9 Larry Chitwood with deep gratitude for his significant contributions enlightening many students of the landscape now and in the future. Forest Restoration 10 Discover the Natural World 11-13 Lawrence A. Chitwood Discovery in the Kids Corner 14 (August 4, 1942 - January 4, 2008) Take the Road Less Traveled 15 Larry was a geologist for the Deschutes National Forest from 1972 until his Get High on Nature 16 retirement in June 2007. Larry was deeply involved in the creation of Newberry National Volcanic Monument and with the exhibits dedicated in 2009 at Lava Lands What's Your Interest? Visitor Center. He was well known throughout the The Deschutes and Ochoco National Forests are a recre- geologic and scientific communities for his enthusiastic support for those wishing ation haven. There are 2.5 million acres of forest including to learn more about Central Oregon. seven wilderness areas comprising 200,000 acres, six rivers, Larry was a gifted storyteller and an ever- 157 lakes and reservoirs, approximately 1,600 miles of trails, flowing source of knowledge. Lava Lands Visitor Center and the unique landscape of Newberry National Volcanic Monument. Explore snow- capped mountains or splash through whitewater rapids; there is something for everyone.
  • DOI-BLM-OR-P060-2010-0026-EA BLM Beach Site

    DOI-BLM-OR-P060-2010-0026-EA BLM Beach Site

    BLM Beach EA Number: DOI-BLM-OR-P060-2010-0026-EA Date of Preparation: September, 2010 Deschutes Resource Area, Prineville, Oregon BLM Beach EA # DOI-BLM-OR-P060-2010-0026 Contents CONTENTS......................................................................................................................... I LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................II 1.0 PURPOSE AND NEED FOR ACTION ...............................................................1 1.1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................1 1.2 SCOPE OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS ....................................................1 1.3 PROPOSED ACTION ..........................................................................................3 1.4 PURPOSE AND NEED........................................................................................9 1.5 PUBLIC AND AGENCY INVOLVEMENT .......................................................9 1.6 CONFORMANCE WITH LAND USE PLANS, REGULATIONS, AND LAWS .................................................................................................................11 2.0 ALTERNATIVES...............................................................................................12 2.1 ALTERNATIVES EVALUATED IN DETAIL .................................................12 2.2 ALTERNATIVES AND ACTION ELEMENTS CONSIDERED BUT ELIMINATED FROM DETAILED EVALUATION ........................................21
  • Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certification Hells Canyon Complex (FERC Project Number 1971)

    Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certification Hells Canyon Complex (FERC Project Number 1971)

    Evaluation and Findings Report: Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certification Hells Canyon Complex (FERC Project Number 1971) May 2019 Northwest Region 700 NE Multnomah St. Suite 600 Portland, OR 97232 Phone: 503-229-5696 800-452-4011 Fax: 503-229-5850 www.oregon.gov/DEQ DEQ is a leader in restoring, maintaining and enhancing the quality of Oregon’s air, land and water. Oregon Department of Environmental Quality 401 Water Quality Certification Hells Canyon Complex (FERC Project Number 1971) This report prepared by: Oregon Department of Environmental Quality 700 NE Multnomah St Suite 600 Portland, OR 97232 1-800-452-4011 www.oregon.gov/deq Contact: Marilyn Fonseca 503-229-6804 Documents can be provided upon request in an alternate format for individuals with disabilities or in a language other than English for people with limited English skills. To request a document in another format or language, call DEQ in Portland at 503-229-5696, or toll-free in Oregon at 1-800-452-4011, ext. 5696; or email [email protected]. State of Oregon Department of Environmental Quality ii 401 Water Quality Certification Hells Canyon Complex (FERC Project Number 1971) Table of Contents 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Requirements for Certification ............................................................................................................ 1 2.1 Applicable Federal and State Law ..............................................................................................
  • Dams and Hydroelectricity in the Columbia

    Dams and Hydroelectricity in the Columbia

    COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN: DAMS AND HYDROELECTRICITY The power of falling water can be converted to hydroelectricity A Powerful River Major mountain ranges and large volumes of river flows into the Pacific—make the Columbia precipitation are the foundation for the Columbia one of the most powerful rivers in North America. River Basin. The large volumes of annual runoff, The entire Columbia River on both sides of combined with changes in elevation—from the the border is one of the most hydroelectrically river’s headwaters at Canal Flats in BC’s Rocky developed river systems in the world, with more Mountain Trench, to Astoria, Oregon, where the than 470 dams on the main stem and tributaries. Two Countries: One River Changing Water Levels Most dams on the Columbia River system were built between Deciding how to release and store water in the Canadian the 1940s and 1980s. They are part of a coordinated water Columbia River system is a complex process. Decision-makers management system guided by the 1964 Columbia River Treaty must balance obligations under the CRT (flood control and (CRT) between Canada and the United States. The CRT: power generation) with regional and provincial concerns such as ecosystems, recreation and cultural values. 1. coordinates flood control 2. optimizes hydroelectricity generation on both sides of the STORING AND RELEASING WATER border. The ability to store water in reservoirs behind dams means water can be released when it’s needed for fisheries, flood control, hydroelectricity, irrigation, recreation and transportation. Managing the River Releasing water to meet these needs influences water levels throughout the year and explains why water levels The Columbia River system includes creeks, glaciers, lakes, change frequently.
  • The Hells Canyon Dam Controversy

    The Hells Canyon Dam Controversy

    N 1956, AT THE TENDER AGE OF THIRTY-TWO, Frank Church made a bold bid for the United States Senate. After squeak- I ing out a victory in the hotly contested Idaho Democratic pri- mary, Church faced down incumbent Senator Herman Welker, re- ceiving nearly percent of the vote. One issue that loomed over the campaign was an emerging dis- pute over building dams in the Snake River’s Hells Canyon. While Church and other Democrats supported the construction of a high federal dam in the Idaho gorge, their Republican opponents favored developing the resource through private utility companies. Idaho EVOLUTION voters split on the issue, and so, seeking to avoid a divisive debate, Church downplayed his position during the general election “be- of an cause it was not a winning issue, politically.”1 Senator Frank Church Although Church won the election, he could not escape the is- sue. Indeed, his victory and subsequent assignment to the Senate Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs put him at the center of a growing controversy about damming Hells Canyon. Over the next eighteen years, Church wrestled with balancing Idaho’s demand for economic growth and his own pro-development beliefs with an emerging environmental movement’s demand for preservation of nature—in Idaho and across the nation. As he grappled with these competing interests, Church under- went a significant transformation. While Church often supported development early in his Senate career, he, like few others of his time, began to see the value of wild places and to believe that rivers offered more than power production opportunities and irrigation water.
  • Snake River Flow Augmentation Impact Analysis Appendix

    Snake River Flow Augmentation Impact Analysis Appendix

    SNAKE RIVER FLOW AUGMENTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS APPENDIX Prepared for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Walla Walla District’s Lower Snake River Juvenile Salmon Migration Feasibility Study and Environmental Impact Statement United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Pacific Northwest Region Boise, Idaho February 1999 Acronyms and Abbreviations (Includes some common acronyms and abbreviations that may not appear in this document) 1427i A scenario in this analysis that provides up to 1,427,000 acre-feet of flow augmentation with large drawdown of Reclamation reservoirs. 1427r A scenario in this analysis that provides up to 1,427,000 acre-feet of flow augmentation with reservoir elevations maintained near current levels. BA Biological assessment BEA Bureau of Economic Analysis (U.S. Department of Commerce) BETTER Box Exchange Transport Temperature Ecology Reservoir (a water quality model) BIA Bureau of Indian Affairs BID Burley Irrigation District BIOP Biological opinion BLM Bureau of Land Management B.P. Before present BPA Bonneville Power Administration CES Conservation Extension Service cfs Cubic feet per second Corps U.S. Army Corps of Engineers CRFMP Columbia River Fish Mitigation Program CRP Conservation Reserve Program CVPIA Central Valley Project Improvement Act CWA Clean Water Act DO Dissolved Oxygen Acronyms and Abbreviations (Includes some common acronyms and abbreviations that may not appear in this document) DREW Drawdown Regional Economic Workgroup DDT Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane EIS Environmental Impact Statement EP Effective Precipitation EPA Environmental Protection Agency ESA Endangered Species Act ETAW Evapotranspiration of Applied Water FCRPS Federal Columbia River Power System FERC Federal Energy Regulatory Commission FIRE Finance, investment, and real estate HCNRA Hells Canyon National Recreation Area HUC Hydrologic unit code I.C.
  • Assessment of Fisheries Losses in the Upper Snake River Basin in Idaho Attributable to Construction and Operation of Dams with Federal Hydropower Facilities

    Assessment of Fisheries Losses in the Upper Snake River Basin in Idaho Attributable to Construction and Operation of Dams with Federal Hydropower Facilities

    ASSESSMENT OF FISHERIES LOSSES IN THE UPPER SNAKE RIVER BASIN IN IDAHO ATTRIBUTABLE TO CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF DAMS WITH FEDERAL HYDROPOWER FACILITIES Idaho Department of Fish and Game IDFG Report Number 07-52 August 2007 ASSESSMENT OF FISHERIES LOSSES IN THE UPPER SNAKE RIVER BASIN IN IDAHO ATTRIBUTABLE TO CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF DAMS WITH FEDERAL HYDROPOWER FACILITIES Prepared by: Idaho Department of Fish and Game 600 South Walnut Street P.O. Box 25 Boise, ID 83707 IDFG Report Number 07-52 August 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ASSESSMENT OF FISHERIES LOSSES IN THE UPPER SNAKE RIVER BASIN IN IDAHO ATTRIBUTABLE TO CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF DAMS WITH FEDERAL HYDROPOWER FACILITIES................................................................................ 1 ABSTRACT................................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 2 BACKGROUND AND DESCRIPTION OF STUDY AREAS.......................................................... 2 Anderson Ranch Dam and Reservoir ........................................................................................ 2 Black Canyon Dam and Reservoir............................................................................................. 3 Deadwood Dam and Reservoir.................................................................................................. 4 Boise River Diversion
  • Chapter 5 Supplemental Planning Sections

    Chapter 5 Supplemental Planning Sections

    Chapter 5 Supplemental Sections Planning Section 5.1 Introduction Background This chapter provides material that supplements the other chapters of the Plan. There are no goals or policies in these sections. Purpose The purpose of this chapter is to provide a glossary, list all acknowledged Goal 5 resources in one location (see Section 2.4) and list all Goal Exceptions and Goal 5 inventories. The final section in this Chapter is a table to track all amendments to this Plan. This table will ensure a clear legislative history is maintained. The following information is covered in this chapter. Glossary and Acronyms (Section 5.2) . Goal 5 Water Resources (Section 5.3) . Goal 5 Wildlife Resources (Section 5.4) . Goal 5 Open Space and Scenic Views and Sites Resources (Section 5.5) . Goal 5 Energy Resources (Section 5.6) . Goal 5 Wilderness, Natural Areas and Recreation Trails (Section 5.7) . Goal 5 Surface Mining Resources (Section 5.8) . Goal 5 Cultural and Historic Resources (Section 5.9) . Goal Exception Statements (Section 5.10) . Goal 5 Adopted Ordinances (Section 5.11) . Ordinance History (Section 5.12) 2 DESCHUTES COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - 2011 CHAPTER 5 SUPPLEMENTAL SECTIONS SECTION 5.1 INTRODUCTION Section 5.2 Glossary and Acronyms Glossary Note: Terms defined in Deschutes County Code 18.04 (Zoning Code) are not repeated here, but have the same meaning as DCC 18.04. “Agricultural-tourism” or “Agri-tourism” means a commercial enterprise at a working farm or ranch, operated in conjunction with the primary farm or ranch use, conducted for the enjoyment and/or education of visitors, that promotes successful agriculture, generates supplemental income for the owner and complies with Oregon Statute and Rule.
  • Celebrating Twenty Years of Conservation Work in the Deschutes Basin

    Celebrating Twenty Years of Conservation Work in the Deschutes Basin

    SUMMER 2016 VOL. 10 NO. 2 NEWSLETTER OF THE DESCHUTES RIVER CONSERVANCY A MESSAGE FROM THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, TOD HEISLER Artist: Susan Luckey Higdon PHOTO: DRC STAFF Celebrating Twenty Years of Conservation Work in the Deschutes Basin Twenty years ago, a small group of District, flows have increased signifi- irrigation purposes, and upstream people came together with a vision cantly below the district’s pumps. from irrigation diversions, so the of leaving our rivers and streams tools we have used in the past will better than they found them. Bend While these reaches have vastly not be enough to solve this complex was on the precipice of a population improved, we still have work to do. and far-reaching problem. boom, and the Deschutes River and Work like this is only possible The solution to restoring the Upper its tributaries had already been over- through building trust and strong allocated for nearly 100 years. Deschutes River lies in the way we relationships. Working with our use and manage water in Central Since 1996, the Deschutes River partners, the DRC has used flow Oregon. Our century old system will Conservancy has brought stakehold- restoration tools such as piping and not meet the changing demands for ers together across the basin to lining canals, water rights leasing, water in our basin. Cities with grow- restore 200 cubic feet per second and instream transfers to make real ing populations are challenged to (cfs) to our rivers. progress in these reaches. meet future water needs. Increased pressure from drought and litigation What does that look like? 20 years After 20 years, an area that has seen practically no restoration is the have created insecurity for commer- ago, Whychus Creek ran dry two out cial farmers who depend on unreli- of every three summers.