University of Groningen Russian Gas for Europe Smeenk

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

University of Groningen Russian Gas for Europe Smeenk University of Groningen Russian gas for Europe Smeenk, Tom IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2010 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Smeenk, T. (2010). Russian gas for Europe: Creating access and choice. Underpinning Russia's gas export strategy with Gazprom's infrastructure investments. Clingendael International Energy Programme . Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). The publication may also be distributed here under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license. More information can be found on the University of Groningen website: https://www.rug.nl/library/open-access/self-archiving-pure/taverne- amendment. Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 30-09-2021 PART II 109 110 Chapter 5 Soviet Union’s gas export strategy to Europe 5.1 Introduction Shortly after the Second World War, the Soviet Union began exporting natural gas to Poland on a very small scale. 108 Only in the 1960s did the export of natural gas expand to include other European countries that fell under the Soviet sphere of influence through the CMEA 109 . Austria was the first capitalist country in Western Europe to purchase a small volume of gas from the Soviet Union, followed in the 1970s by larger Soviet sales to West Germany, Italy and France [Victor and Victor 2006]. In the Soviet period and be- fore the liberalisation of the gas market in the EU, the chosen institutional framework for Soviet gas supply to Western Europe was relatively stable, with an oligopoly of importers and exporters being connected to each other through long-term contracts. Governments were typically also directly involved in the realisation of gas projects, through ownership interests and investment guarantees (see also Chapter 2) [Finon en Midttun 2004]. In this chapter a description is given of the Soviet export strategy for natural gas in Europe before the disintegration of the Soviet Union and before the European liberalisation of the gas sector, which began in the 1990s. For Europe, a distinction is made between the Cen- tral and Eastern European countries that belonged to the CMEA and the Western Euro- pean countries. The export strategy is described in light of the rationale of the Soviet Un- ion for commencing gas production and marketing it. In the analysis, emphasis will be placed on economic aspects. The chapter starts with the internal (institutional) gas market developments in the Soviet Union, Western Europe and the CMEA countries. Section 5.2 looks at the developments in the Soviet Union gas market up until the fall of the Soviet empire and of the centrally planned economic model. Section 5.3 describes the structure of the gas market in Western Europe before the gas market liberalisation and that of the gas market in the CMEA under the Soviet Union’s sphere of influence. In Section 5.4 the supply and transport of Soviet gas to the CMEA and Western Europe are discussed. The chapter ends with a concluding section. 108 For an extensive description and analysis of the Soviet gas deliveries to Europe and the institutional development of Soviet gas, see: Maarse [1976]; Stern [1980]; Stent [1982]; Stein [1983]; Gustafson [1985]; Stern [1987]; Gustafson [1989]; Van der Linde [1991]; Stern [1993]; Victor and Victor [2006]. 109 The unofficial designation is Comecon. The CMEA was an organisation that supported economic cooperation between the Central and Eastern European communist countries, largely under the command of the Soviet Union, and was a reaction by the Soviet Union to the Marshall Plan. The CMEA had to guarantee the implementation of financial assistance to these countries, initiated by the Cominform. In this research, the CMEA-6 is used as the collective term for six countries in central and Eastern Europe with a planned economy, namely East Germany, Poland, Czechoslova- kia, Hungary, Romania and Bulgaria. The Soviet Republic, Cuba, the People’s Republic of Mongolia and observers North Korea and North Vietnam, which also were part of the CMEA, fall outside the CMEA-6 group in this research. Former Yugoslavia, as associated member of the CMEA, and Albania are listed separately where relevant. 111 5.2 Rationale for Soviet’s gas production and exports and its institutionalisation In the 1820s, natural gas was used for the first time for central lighting on St. Petersburg’s Aptekarsky Island. In the course of the nineteenth century, other cities followed St. Pe- tersburg’s example.110 Gas was captured on a larger scale at oil production sites in Azerbai- jan in the 1870s [CE/CIEP 2007]. However, gas production in the Soviet Union re- mained limited to 3 bcm/y until after the Second World War [Victor and Victor 2006]. 5.2.1 Rationale for Soviet’s gas production and exports During Stalin’s last governing years (1945-1953), energy consumption grew by more than 9 percent per year. The underlying causes were strong industrial growth in combination with inefficient use of energy. However, the share of gas in the Soviet energy mix remained limited (2 percent, or 9 bcm, in 1953) due to the dominant roles of coal and, to a lesser extent, oil, during this period [Victor and Victor 2006]. In 1942, gas fields were discov- ered in the Kuibyshev region and around the same time the development of the gas field near the village of Elshanka was commenced, largely to the benefit of the industry in Sara- tov, southeast of Moscow. In 1943, the first long-distance pipeline (160 kilometres) began to be used between Bouguruslan and Kuibyshev. Substantial transport of gas started three years later – shortly after the Second World War – with the realisation of the 843 kilome- tre-long gas pipeline between Saratov and Moscow. In the 1950s, other gas fields were linked to the gas network around Moscow.111 Until the mid-1950s, gas production in the Soviet Union was largely limited to the Saratov region and Ukraine [Victor and Victor 2006]. Under Khrushchev the position of gas gained importance, although at first oil was pre- ferred due to the flexibility with which it could be used in industry. In his first five-year plan112 (1956-1960) he formulated goals for equalling the American economy within 25 years. He intended to reach these goals through the modernisation of the economy, in which modern fuels received an important place because of their flexible and efficient application. In the seventh five-year plan (1959-1965) gas was increasingly consumed in the industry [Victor and Victor 2006]. The increased demand for gas by the Soviet Un- ion’s heavy industry needed to be met with new production from the gas fields in the Soviet republics in the Caspian region (mainly Turkmenistan). In order to link the gas 110 In the period that Russia was ruled by tsars, under the Romanov dynasty, the following important cities, among others, were supplied with natural gas (in addition to St. Petersburg and Moscow): Kiev, Kharkov, Rostov-on-Don, Odessa, Riga, Vilno, Tver en Kazan [Victor and Victor 2006; Gazprom 2008a]. 111 This started with the gas pipeline Dashava-Kiev-Bryansk-Moscow in 1950, followed by the Tula-Moscow and the Stavropol-Moscow pipelines [Gazprom 2008a]. 112 The sixth in a row in Soviet history. A five-year plan formulates the goals for five years and is an important instru- ment in the communist centrally-guided economy. In the Soviet Union, the Gosplan established roughly policies for economic growth. The plans were in principle focused on fast industrialisation (especially of heavy industry). 112 fields to the markets around Moscow and elsewhere, in 1959 the North Caucasus Center gas pipeline was brought into use; this was followed in the 1960s by a corridor from Cen- tral Asia and the Boukhara-Ural pipeline [Efegil and Stone 2001]. 113 Moreover, in the early 1960s gas was being used from the Ukrainian Soviet Republic, in particular the Shebe- linsky gas field [Victor and Victor 2006; Gazprom 2008a]. This turned the satellite repub- lics in the Caspian region and Ukraine into important areas of gas production and transit for the Soviet Union. In the eighth five-year plan (1966-1971) the importance of the western Siberian gas re- serves, located to the east of the Ural Mountains, was recognised by the then-ruling Soviet leader Brezhnev. 114 In the same period, gas fields were also discovered in Orenburg (north of Kazakhstan), followed by the discovery of the gas fields on the Yamal Peninsula at the beginning of the 1970s (including the Bovanenko and the Kharasevey fields) [Stern 2005]. Due to the development of the gas fields in the Nadym Pur Taz (NPT) region in western Siberia, the centre of gravity of the Soviet gas sector shifted from the end of the 1970s on: • the geography of the Soviet production portfolio changed because gas production in the regions east of the Ural Mountains exceeded the production west of the mountains [Victor and Victor 2006]; and • the Soviet Union became a net exporter of natural gas.
Recommended publications
  • DEVELOPMENT of PREFABRICATED REINFORCED CONCRETE INDUSTRY in the SOVIET UNION (1981-1990) (Technological Platform)
    Russian Academy of Engineering (RAE) Moscow State University of Railway Engineering (MIIT) Kama Institute of Humanitarian and Engineering Technologies (KIHET) B.GUSEV DEVELOPMENT OF PREFABRICATED REINFORCED CONCRETE INDUSTRY IN THE SOVIET UNION (1981-1990) (technological platform) 2nd Enlarged Edition Izhevsk 2015 УДК 666.97 ББК 38.53я73 Gusev B. Development of prefabricated reinforced concrete industry in the Soviet Union (1981-1990) Izhevsk, Publishing House «KIT», 2015. 113 p. ISBN 978-5-902352-57-0 © Gusev B., 2015 © Publishing House «KIT», 2015 PREFACE At present Russia is a country with an enormous territory and a great demand for dwellings and constructions of different purposes. That’s why, all modern construction technologies and materials are in great demand at our home construction market. The production of prefabricated reinforced concrete structures is in special demand. For the last 15 years in domestic construction there has been paid much attention to the cast-in-place construction technology. Having increased the output, the majority of the construction organizations which were engaged in cast-in-place construction couldn’t develop a reliable control system. For this reason, the quality of cast-in-place structures and constructions remains to be poor. Besides, weather conditions don't make it possible to secure some advantages for mass reinforced concrete in Eurasia northern regions. This paper presents to the reader great achievements and technical practices in the industry of prefabricated reinforced concrete in the second half of the XX century. What is more, the fathers of these achievements were Soviet engineers. Therefore, it is gratifying to emphasize that in terms of the output of prefabricated reinforced concrete the Soviet Union took the 1st place in the world and by 1990 it produced 135-140 million m3.
    [Show full text]
  • FBI) Monograph: Soviet Intelligence Targets in the United States 1946 – 1953
    Description of document: Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) monograph: Soviet Intelligence Targets in the United States 1946 – 1953 Released date: 11-September-2008 Posted date: 24-March-2009 Source of document: Federal Bureau of Investigation Record Information/Dissemination Section 170 Marcel Drive Winchester, VA 22602-4843 The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source. Any concerns about the contents of the site should be directed to the agency originating the document in question. GovernmentAttic.org is not responsible for the contents of documents published on the website. u.s. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Investigation Washington, D. C. 20535 September 11, 2008 Subject: SOVIET INTELLIGENCE TARGETS IN THE UNITED STATES (1946-1953) FOIPA No. 1110945- 000 The enclosed documents were reviewed under the Freedom of Information/Privacy Acts (FOIPA), Title 5, United States Code, Section 552/552a.
    [Show full text]
  • Arkhangelsk 2014
    ISSN 2221-2698 Arkhangelsk 2014. № 16 ISSN 2221-2698 Arctiс and North. 2014. N 16 electronic periodical © Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov, 2014 © Editorial board of the electronic scientific journal “Arctic and North”, 2014 Published not less than four times per year The journal is registered at: Roskomnadzor as electronic periodical published in Russian and English. Registration certif- icate of the Federal Service for Supervision of Communications, Information Technologies and Mass Media El № FS77-42809 from November 26, 2010. The ISSN International Centre — world catalog of serials and ongoing resources. ISSN 2221- 2698, 23-24 March 2011. The system of Russian Science Citation Index (RSCI). License contract № 96-04/2011R from April 12, 2011. Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) — catalog of free access journals, 18.08.2013. EBSCO Publishing (2012) and Global Serials Directory Ulrichsweb — periodic international catalog database (2013). Founder — FSAEI HPE Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov. The editorial board staff of the “Arctic and North” journal is published in the Summary section at the end of each issue before the output data. Editor-in-Chief — Yury Fedorovich Lukin, Doctor of Historical Sciences,Professor, Honorary Worker of the higher school of the Russian Federation. Interdisciplinary electronic scientific journal “Arctic and North” is intended for wide audi- ence both in Russia and abroad. The journal publishes articles in which the Arctic and the North are research objects, specifical- ly in the following fields of science: history, economics, social sciences; political science (geopolitics); ecology. The subject and contents of an article submitted for being published must correspond with the profile and the subject of the journal, feature scientific novelty, be of interest to specialists.
    [Show full text]
  • Staking Claims to China's Borderland: Oil, Ores and State- Building In
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Staking Claims to China’s Borderland: Oil, Ores and State- building in Xinjiang Province, 1893-1964 A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History by Judd Creighton Kinzley Committee in charge: Professor Joseph Esherick, Co-chair Professor Paul Pickowicz, Co-chair Professor Barry Naughton Professor Jeremy Prestholdt Professor Sarah Schneewind 2012 Copyright Judd Creighton Kinzley, 2012 All rights reserved. The Dissertation of Judd Creighton Kinzley is approved and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: Co-chair Co- chair University of California, San Diego 2012 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page ................................................................................................................... iii Table of Contents ............................................................................................................... iv Acknowledgments.............................................................................................................. vi Vita ..................................................................................................................................... ix Abstract ................................................................................................................................x Introduction ..........................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • National Indicators Used in the Report
    National Report on Biodiversity in Iraq 2 July 2010 TABLE OF CONTENT Foreword...........................................................................................................................................................................................7 Introduction .....................................................................................................................................................................................8 9....................................................................................................................................................................................ﺍﻟﻤﻠﺨﺺ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻔﻴﺬﻱ Executive summary....................................................................................................................................................................14 Background....................................................................................................................................................................................19 I. Overview of the Biodiversity Status in Iraq...........................................................................................................21 I.1 Biological Diversity and Ecosystems in Iraq ................................................................................................21 I.1.1 Ecoregions of Iraq..........................................................................................................................................22 I.1.2 Terrestrial Ecosystems ................................................................................................................................23
    [Show full text]
  • Industry and Society in Baku, Azerbaijan, 1870- Present
    OIL CAPITAL: INDUSTRY AND SOCIETY IN BAKU, AZERBAIJAN, 1870- PRESENT by REBECCA LINDSAY HASTINGS A DISSERTATION Presented to the Department of History and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy June 2020 DISSERTATION APPROVAL PAGE Student: Rebecca Lindsay Hastings Title: Oil Capital: Industry and Society in Baku, Azerbaijan, 1870-Present This dissertation has been accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy degree in the Department of History by: Julie Hessler Chairperson, Advisor Julie Weise Core Member Ryan Jones Core Member Alexander Murphy Institutional Representative and Kate Mondloch Interim Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School Original approval signatures are on file with the University of Oregon Graduate School Degree awarded June 2020 ii © 2020 Rebecca Lindsay Hastings iii DISSERTATION ABSTRACT Rebecca Lindsay Hastings Doctor of Philosophy Department of History June 2020 Title: Oil Capital: Industry and Society in Baku, Azerbaijan, 1870-Present This dissertation is a historical study of the city of Baku, Azerbaijan, and its oil industry from the 1870s to the present, covering the tsarist Russian, Soviet, and post- Soviet eras. The history of the Baku oil industry offers a clear, focused example of the social and physical effects of the imposition of external parties’ financial and commodity demands on an urban-industrial setting. Baku as an urban environment, comprising not just the physical elements of the city but also its sociocultural communities, has embodied priorities imposed on the oil industry that have shifted as the global importance of oil and natural gas has grown, as those commodities’ uses have changed over time, and according to successive regimes’ respective political and economic ideologies.
    [Show full text]
  • Resource Mobilization Information Digest N 275 January 2013
    o Resource Mobilization Information Digest N 275 January 2013 Sectoral and Cross-Sectoral Integration of Biodiversity in Iraq Contents 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 2 2. Institutional Structure for CBD and core competencies ........................................................................... 3 3. Cross-sectoral legislative needs to achieve main policy goals .................................................................. 5 4. Cross-sectoral legislative needs to address existing and future strategies and other International Conventions .................................................................................................................................................. 6 Existing strategies ......................................................................................................................................... 6 International conventions ............................................................................................................................. 6 5. Upcoming Iraqi National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plans (NBSAP) ............................................... 8 1. Introduction Iraq reported1 that sectoral and cross-sectoral integration of biodiversity policies and actions is required under Article 6 of the Convention. The relevant sectors, excluding the environment, to take into account in the drafting of the NBSAP include: agriculture, water management,
    [Show full text]
  • Soviet Oil Policy and Energy Politics, 1970-1985
    FINAL REPORT T O NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR SOVIET AND EAST EUROPEAN RESEARC H TITLE : Soviet Oil Policy and Energy Politics , 1970-198 5 AUTHOR : Thane Gustafso n CONTRACTOR : Columbia University, Research Institute on Internationa l Chang e PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR : Seweryn Bialer COUNCIL CONTRACT NUMBER : 627-1 3 DATE : March, 198 5 The work leading to this report was supported in whole or i n part from funds provided by the National Council for Sovie t and East European Research . -i - CONTENTS FIGURES i i TABLES Sectio n EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 I . THE DILEMMAS OF SOVIET OIL POLICY 3 II . THE BREZHNEV EMERGENCY RESPONSE, 1977-1980 1 8 A. Development 1977-1980 1 9 B. Exploration, 1977-80 26 III . SOVIET OIL POLICY SINCE 1980 3 1 A. Exploration in the 1980s 33 B. Development and Production Since 1980 3 7 C. The Latest Developments in West Siberia and Thei r Implications 5 5 IV . CONCLUSION 58 FIGURES 1 . Oil output versus investment - TABLE S 1 . Soviet Oil Output, 1975-1984 3 2 . Investment Data, Soviet Oil Industry, 1976-1983 (billions o f rubles) 3 . Drilling for Gas and Oil, Country-Wide 8 4 . Drilling for Gas and Oil, West Siberia 9 5 . Qualitative Trends in Soviet Oil Drilling : Key MNP Indicators 1 0 6 . Investment vs . Net Output Increments for Oil, Gas, and Coa l Compared (1982) 1 2 7 . Annual Rates of Increase in Soviet Oil Investment, 1978-8 2 (percent) 1 2 8 . All-Union and West Siberian MNP Drilling Compare d (development and exploration) 1 9 9 .
    [Show full text]
  • Kuznetsk Coal Basin)
    NEDO-IC-99R09 04 Study for Recovery and Utilization of Coal Mine Gas in Russia(Kuznetsk Coal Basin) March, 2000 NEDOBIS E99007. New Energy and Industial Technology Development Organization Consignee : Japan Coal Energy Center 020004896-5 “Basic Study for Promoting Joint Implementation and Others” -Study for Recovery and Utilization of Coal Mine Gas in Russia (Kuznetsk Coal Basin) Consignee: Japan Coal Energy Center Completion Date of Survey Report: March, 2000 (303 Pages) The purpose of this Survey is to link the energy substitutes and the reduction of global warming gases in Russian coal mines, with the promotion of joint implementation projects of the Kyoto-mechanism, recovering gas which is released in developing coal mines efficiently and emitting into the air as less as possible, utilizing these recovered gas positively for power generation and others, and ensuring mine safety of coal mines, by introducing to the coal mines in Russia Japanese technologies and facilities connected with coal mine methane recovery/control and utilization of gas. NEDO-IC-99R09 Study for Recovery and Utilization of Coal Mine Gas in Russia(Kuznetsk Coal Basin) March, 2000 New Energy and Industial Technology Development Organization Consignee : Japan Coal Energy Center Introduction This paper summarizes the outcome of the "Study on the Recovery and Utilization of the Coal Mine Methane Gas in the Kuznetsk Basin, Russia." a basic study for the promotion of joint implementation, conducted in the fiscal year 1999 by the Japan Coal Energy Center (JCOAL), commissioned by the New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO). In December 1997, the Third Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (COP3) was held, and the Kyoto Protocol was adopted, aiming at a reduction of the average emission by 5% below 1990 levels in the commitment period 2008 to 2012, to prevent the global warming caused by greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide gas.
    [Show full text]
  • The United States of America and the Russian Federation
    Please do not remove this page Energy Diplomacy: the United States of America and the Russian Federation Gasparyan, Arsen https://scholarship.miami.edu/discovery/delivery/01UOML_INST:ResearchRepository/12355413210002976?l#13355503220002976 Gasparyan, A. (2018). Energy Diplomacy: the United States of America and the Russian Federation [University of Miami]. https://scholarship.miami.edu/discovery/fulldisplay/alma991031447748902976/01UOML_INST:ResearchR epository Embargo Downloaded On 2021/09/30 22:11:03 -0400 Please do not remove this page UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI ENERGY DIPLOMACY: THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION By Arsen Gasparyan A DISSERTATION Submitted to the Faculty of the University of Miami in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Coral Gables, Florida August 2018 © 2018 Arsen Gasparyan All Rights Reserved UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy ENERGY DIPLOMACY: THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION Arsen Gasparyan Approved: Roger E. Kanet, Ph.D. Bruce M. Bagley, Ph.D. Professor of Political Science Professor of International Studies Department of Political Science Department of International Studies Lilian Yaffe, Ph.D. Guillermo J. Prado, Ph.D. Senior Lecturer Dean of the Graduate School Department of Geography and Regional Studies Edward Glab, Ph.D. Graduate Faculty and Director of Global Energy and Sustainability Forum School of International and Public Affairs Florida International University GASPARYAN, ARSEN (Ph.D., International Studies) Energy Diplomacy: (August 2018) The United States of America and The Russian Federation Abstract of a dissertation at the University of Miami Dissertation supervised by Professor Roger E.
    [Show full text]
  • Acknowledgments
    Acknowledgments The idea to write a book about the historical origins of Russia’s natural gas exports and Europe’s energy dependence was born in connection with the much-publicized Russian-Ukrainian gas crisis in January 2006. My colleague Arne Kaijser and I had just completed a book on the internationalization of electricity markets, and were in the early phase of another research project addressing the globalization of the nuclear fuel cycle. Western Europe’s highly internationalized gas supply seemed to have the potential to become an excit- ing addition to our research on international energy relations in historical perspective. Shortly afterward, two important calls for research applications opened. The first was launched by the Swedish Energy Agency and was for general energy systems studies. It helped us secure funding for a project on the ways in which the Swedish energy system has developed links to foreign ones. A major part of it took the form of a PhD project on the history of Sweden’s natural gas supply, carried out by Anna Åberg. Her thesis is currently being finalized and can be regarded as an interesting complement to R ed Gas. The second call, “Inventing Europe,” was launched by the European Science Foundation (ESF) in cooperation with several national research councils, and was for collabora- tive research projects with a transnational scope in the history of technology. Our group in Stockholm joined forces with seven other universities in six European countries, which resulted in a major grant for a project addressing the emergence and governance of Europe’s critical infrastructures, EUROCRIT, with Arne Kaijser as project leader.
    [Show full text]
  • Pipeline Gas Introduction to the Korean Peninsula
    Pipeline Gas Introduction to the Korean Peninsula Dr Keun-Wook Paik Associate Fellow, Sustainable Development Programme Royal Institute of International Affairs (Chatham House) January 2005 Report Submission to Korea Foundation Korea Foundation Project ‘Energy and Environmental Cooperation in the Korean Peninsula Contents Page Summary............................................................................................................................ 1 1.1. Pipeline Gas Supply Sources for the Korean Peninsula ...................................... 2 1.1.1. Irkutsk gas export to the Korean Peninsula.......................................................... 4 1.1.2. Sakha gas exports to the Korean Peninsula ...................................................... 12 1.1.3. Sakhalin Gas exports to the Korean Peninsula.................................................. 15 1.2. North and South Korea’s approach to pipeline gas development .................... 21 1.2.1. South Korea’s initiative ....................................................................................... 21 1.2.2. The DPRK’s stance towards pipeline gas .......................................................... 26 1.3. The implications of energy cooperation between the two Koreas.................... 39 Pipeline Gas Introduction to the Korean Peninsula Dr Keun-Wook Paik (January 2005) Summary · Energy cooperation on the Korean peninsula is now a real possibility after the historic North - South Korea Summit in June 2000. However, it will only be possible after a political
    [Show full text]