The United States of America and the Russian Federation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The United States of America and the Russian Federation Please do not remove this page Energy Diplomacy: the United States of America and the Russian Federation Gasparyan, Arsen https://scholarship.miami.edu/discovery/delivery/01UOML_INST:ResearchRepository/12355413210002976?l#13355503220002976 Gasparyan, A. (2018). Energy Diplomacy: the United States of America and the Russian Federation [University of Miami]. https://scholarship.miami.edu/discovery/fulldisplay/alma991031447748902976/01UOML_INST:ResearchR epository Embargo Downloaded On 2021/09/30 22:11:03 -0400 Please do not remove this page UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI ENERGY DIPLOMACY: THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION By Arsen Gasparyan A DISSERTATION Submitted to the Faculty of the University of Miami in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Coral Gables, Florida August 2018 © 2018 Arsen Gasparyan All Rights Reserved UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy ENERGY DIPLOMACY: THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION Arsen Gasparyan Approved: Roger E. Kanet, Ph.D. Bruce M. Bagley, Ph.D. Professor of Political Science Professor of International Studies Department of Political Science Department of International Studies Lilian Yaffe, Ph.D. Guillermo J. Prado, Ph.D. Senior Lecturer Dean of the Graduate School Department of Geography and Regional Studies Edward Glab, Ph.D. Graduate Faculty and Director of Global Energy and Sustainability Forum School of International and Public Affairs Florida International University GASPARYAN, ARSEN (Ph.D., International Studies) Energy Diplomacy: (August 2018) The United States of America and The Russian Federation Abstract of a dissertation at the University of Miami Dissertation supervised by Professor Roger E. Kanet No. of pages in text. (302) New energy opportunities provide effective ways to advance energy superpowers’ foreign policy objectives. Oil and gas are capable of providing producer states with internal order and external influence and are thus a source of relative power. This research examines how energy shapes superpower nations’ foreign policy, analyzing cases of the United States of America and the Russian Federation after the end of the Cold War till the early 21st century with a diachronic selection of the most important developments. More detailed analysis covers the period from 2000 till the present to demonstrate how widely the U.S. and Russian national security and diplomacy are affected by energy concerns. In this project energy refers to crude oil, refined products, and natural gas. Acknowledgments My interest in energy has been influenced by my late friends Blas Ramon Casares, a hero and survivor of the Bay of Pigs and Erwin Arrieta-Valera, the former Minister of Mines and Energy in Venezuela. Their practical knowledge played a pivotal role in helping me understand the business world of energy. I am also grateful to my friend Arman Grigoryan, a member of Lehigh University’s faculty, who is an endless source of inspiration. I owe a profound debt of gratitude to my principal mentors, Professors Roger Kanet and Bruce Bagley. This research benefited immeasurably from their comments. Both of them challenged me to make revisions to improve the quality of my arguments and conclusions. Years ago, after the break-up of the Soviet Union, in the fledgling country of now independent Armenia, I was studying the views of various American scholars who contributed to Roger Kanet’s edited books including The Cold War as Cooperation: Superpower Cooperation in Regional Conflict Management and Coping with Conflict after the Cold War, and later fate decided everything for me here at the University of Miami. Professor Kanet kindly agreed to be my advisor and read and commented on the entire manuscript not only once but parts of it several times. This research also benefited tremendously from a rich and intellectual environment created by Professor Bagley and the Annual Energy Conferences held at our university under his organization and supervision. I am deeply grateful to Dr. Lilian Yaffe and Dr. Edward Glab for their excellent suggestions and comments to improve this study. Moreover, Dr. Yaffe’s course on iii Comparative Politics helped me a lot through my journey. Dr. Glab’s Energy Conferences at Florida International University advanced my knowledge in the energy field. The best comes last. I was encouraged every step of the way by my charming wife Iren. Without her support, there would have been no dissertation. And finally, my eight- year old son Arsen was the wonderful catalyst who pushed me to complete this work, so we can spend more time together. iv CONTENTS Introduction 1 Chapter One. Literature Review 7 Chapter Two. Theoretical Framework and Research Design 16 The Tradition of Neoclassical Realism and Variables of this Research 19 Research Design 33 Chapter Three. Oil and Great Power Politics: Historical Overview of the 20th Century 40 Energy and Foreign Policy of the United States: 1991-2000 59 Russia’s Emergence Out of Chaos: 1991-2000 69 Conclusion 77 Chapter Four. Case Study #1: The United States 81 The Energy Strategy of the Bush Administration 84 Western Hemisphere 87 Middle East 94 Beyond the Latin America and Persian Gulf: Sources of Diversification 100 The Obama Administration and Energy 114 Oil’s Comeback 117 The Institutionalization of U.S. Energy and Foreign Policy Priorities 124 Western Hemisphere and U.S. – Latin America Energy Engagement 126 Middle East Again 131 Africa 135 Russia and Asia 139 Quantitative Approach 149 Conclusion 153 Chapter Five. Case Study # 2: the Russian Federation 169 Taking Control: Energy Assets and the Foreign Policy Concept 174 Russia in the Former Soviet Union Space: Energy and Foreign Policy 182 The EU – Russia Energy Relationship 207 OPEC, Oil Prices, and Russia’s Power Play in the Middle East 226 Russia in Asia: Energy Politics 235 Conclusion 246 Chapter Six. Conclusion 266 Bibliography 278 v LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Big Oil 39 Figure 2. Oil Prices and Chronology of the Major Events of the 20th Century 80 Figure 3: U.S. Petroleum Imports from 2000 to 2017 by Main Source Country 151 Figure 4. Top 7 Suppliers of U.S. Oil Imports 2000 161 Figure 5. Average Annual Brent Oil Prices 2000-2008 162 Figure 6. Top 7 Suppliers of U.S. Oil Imports 2008 163 Figure 7. 50 Years of U.S. Crude Oil Production 164 Figure 8. Top 7 Suppliers of U.S. Oil Imports 2016 165 Figure 9. U.S. Petroleum Imports from Saudi Arabia between 2000-2016 166 Figure 10. Average Crude Oil Prices 2008-2016 167 Figure 11. Who Owns “Big Oil” in the United States 168 Figure 12. The Purchase of Natural Gas by Ukraine from Russia 260 Figure 13. Nord Stream 1 and Nord Stream 2 Routes 261 Figure 14. Turk Stream 261 Figure 15. Russian Natural Gas Exports to European Countries 263 Figure 16. Dynamics of the Prices for Brent Crude Oil (2014 – January 2018) 264 vi LIST OF TABLES Table 1. U.S.- Latin America Energy Cooperation Initiatives 130 Table 2. Average Petroleum Supply to the U.S.: Years 2000-2017 150 Table 3. Correlation Analysis Table 151 Table 4. Leading Russian Energy Companies 259 Table 5. Turk Stream and Nord Stream 2 262 Table 6. Sino-Russian Energy Deals (2003-2016) 265 vii Introduction Has energy become a priority in the foreign policy of energy superpowers, such as the United States and Russia? How is energy shaping the foreign policies of these producers, regardless of the political and economic systems of the state? How much is the global oil business an extension of the foreign policy of these countries? How would these energy superpowers meet the challenges of Asian consumption and what would be their oil game plans? These research questions are based on my personal observations and readings and more than ten-year experience of various meetings with high ranking officials of different governments and petroleum industry executives. How energy can impact foreign policy is a puzzle that requires an intensive study of oil, geopolitics, and foreign policy. In this research, energy refers to crude oil, refined products, and natural gas. Many scholars argue that energy resources are a strategic national asset, consolidating the foreign and domestic status of a given state.1 However, oil has only recently come to prominence as a foreign policy factor. Energy development can contribute significantly to foreign policy objectives. Jan Kalicki and David Goldwyn argue that the need to integrate energy and foreign policy should follow from the link between energy and security, and the world’s increasingly risky sources of energy supply.2 Oil and 1 See Hans Morgenthau, Kenneth Thompson, Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1985), Sixth Edition, pp.133-136; Daniel Yergin, The Prize: The Epic Quest for Oil, Money and Power (New York - London: Free Press, 2009), pp. xiv-xvii; Kenneth N. Waltz, Theory of International Politics, (Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press. 2010), pp.153-155; Amelia Hadfield, “Energy and Foreign Policy: EU – Russia Energy Dynamics,” in Steve Smith et al eds., Foreign Policy: Theories, Actors, Cases, (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008), pp. 322-324; Øystein Noreng, Crude Power: Politics and the Oil Market (London: I.B. Tauris, 2006), p. 42. 2 Jan Kalicki and David Goldwyn, “Introduction: The Need to Integrate Energy and Foreign Policy” in Jan Kalicki and David Goldwyn eds., Energy and Security: Toward a New Foreign Policy Strategy, (Washington D.C. - Baltimore: Woodrow Wilson Center Press and The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2005), p. 5.! 1 2 natural gas possess particular geographic and tangible attributes which shape their role in the peacetime and direct their use in time of war. Energy has the ability to transform dramatically the fortunes of states: the revenue raised by the sale of energy exports usually prevails over of any other national industry.
Recommended publications
  • DEVELOPMENT of PREFABRICATED REINFORCED CONCRETE INDUSTRY in the SOVIET UNION (1981-1990) (Technological Platform)
    Russian Academy of Engineering (RAE) Moscow State University of Railway Engineering (MIIT) Kama Institute of Humanitarian and Engineering Technologies (KIHET) B.GUSEV DEVELOPMENT OF PREFABRICATED REINFORCED CONCRETE INDUSTRY IN THE SOVIET UNION (1981-1990) (technological platform) 2nd Enlarged Edition Izhevsk 2015 УДК 666.97 ББК 38.53я73 Gusev B. Development of prefabricated reinforced concrete industry in the Soviet Union (1981-1990) Izhevsk, Publishing House «KIT», 2015. 113 p. ISBN 978-5-902352-57-0 © Gusev B., 2015 © Publishing House «KIT», 2015 PREFACE At present Russia is a country with an enormous territory and a great demand for dwellings and constructions of different purposes. That’s why, all modern construction technologies and materials are in great demand at our home construction market. The production of prefabricated reinforced concrete structures is in special demand. For the last 15 years in domestic construction there has been paid much attention to the cast-in-place construction technology. Having increased the output, the majority of the construction organizations which were engaged in cast-in-place construction couldn’t develop a reliable control system. For this reason, the quality of cast-in-place structures and constructions remains to be poor. Besides, weather conditions don't make it possible to secure some advantages for mass reinforced concrete in Eurasia northern regions. This paper presents to the reader great achievements and technical practices in the industry of prefabricated reinforced concrete in the second half of the XX century. What is more, the fathers of these achievements were Soviet engineers. Therefore, it is gratifying to emphasize that in terms of the output of prefabricated reinforced concrete the Soviet Union took the 1st place in the world and by 1990 it produced 135-140 million m3.
    [Show full text]
  • Negotiating Energy Diplomacy and Its Relationship with Foreign Policy and National Security
    International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy ISSN: 2146-4553 available at http: www.econjournals.com International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 2020, 10(2), 1-6. Negotiating Energy Diplomacy and its Relationship with Foreign Policy and National Security Ana Bovan1, Tamara Vučenović1, Nenad Perić2* 1Metropolitan University, Faculty of Management, Belgrade, Serbia, 2Faculty for Diplomacy and Security, Belgrade, Serbia. *Email: [email protected] Received: 19 September 2019 Accepted: 01 December 2019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.8754 ABSTRACT Energy diplomacy is a complex field of international relations, closely linked to its principal, foreign policy and overall national security. We observe the relationship of issues that belong to the three concepts and how they are intertwined in the geopolitical reality. Despite the ontological hierarchy of the three concepts, where national security is on the highest level of generality, and energy diplomacy on the lowest, it is a recurring theme for them to continuously meet and intersect in realpolitik in a dynamic relationship. The article specifically looks at the integration of energy diplomacy into foreign policy. We discuss two pathways that energy diplomacy has taken on its integration course into foreign policy, namely the path marked by national security topics and the path that is dominantly an economic one. The article also observes the nexus of national security, foreign policy, economic security and economic diplomacy, which is termed the energy security paradox. It exemplifies the inconsistencies in the general state of affairs in which resource riches of a country result in a stable exporter status and consequentially, stable exporting energy diplomacy.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Diplomacy
    2014 Edition NEW PATHS FOR CLIMATE DIPLOMACY leGal notice NEW PATHS FOR The climate diplomacy initiative is a collaborative effort of the Federal Foreign Office in partnership with adelphi, a leading Berlin-based think tank for applied research, policy analysis, and consultancy on global change issues. CLIMATE DIPLOMACY This publication by adelphi research gemeinnützige GmbH is supported by a grant from the German Federal Foreign Office. www.adelphi.de www.auswaertiges-amt.de Authors Paola Adriázola Alexander Carius Laura Griestop Lena Ruthner Dennis Tänzler Joe Thwaites Stephan Wolters Design stoffers/steinicke www.stoffers-steinicke.de © adelphi, 2014 Foreword Climate Diplomacy – a Foreign Policy Challenge for the 21st Century limate change is one of the most important chal- organisations. In reaching out to partners around the world, we seek to raise awareness lenges that humanity collectively faces in the 21st and explore new ideas on how to best mitigate the effects of climate change in interna- C century. As the recently published Fifth Assess- tional relations. At the initiative’s core is the conviction that we require a new, preventive ment Report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate foreign policy approach: an approach that anticipates climate-induced conflicts of the Change shows, with greater certainty than ever, global future, builds trust now between the stakeholders of those future conflicts, strengthens warming is taking place and is caused by greenhouse the institutions and governance structures needed to address them or develops new forums gas emissions deriving from human activity. The effects for dialogue where they will be needed in future, but where none exist at present.
    [Show full text]
  • Britain, British Petroleum, Shell and the Remaking of the International Oil Industry, 1957-1979
    Empires of Energy: Britain, British Petroleum, Shell and the Remaking of the International Oil Industry, 1957-1979 Author: Jonathan Robert Kuiken Persistent link: http://hdl.handle.net/2345/bc-ir:104079 This work is posted on eScholarship@BC, Boston College University Libraries. Boston College Electronic Thesis or Dissertation, 2013 Copyright is held by the author, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise noted. Boston College The Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Department of History EMPIRES OF ENERGY: BRITAIN, BRITISH PETROLEUM, SHELL AND THE REMAKING OF THE INTERNATIONAL OIL INDUSTRY, 1957-1979 [A dissertation by] JONATHAN R. KUIKEN submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy August, 2013 © copyright by JONATHAN ROBERT KUIKEN 2013 Empires of Energy: Britain, British Petroleum, Shell and the remaking of the international oil industry, 1957-1979 Jonathan R. Kuiken Dissertation Advisor - James E. Cronin Dissertation Abstract This dissertation examines British oil policy from the aftermath of the Suez Crisis in 1956-1957 until the Iranian Revolution and the electoral victory of Margaret Thatcher’s Conservative Party in 1979. It was a period marked by major transitions within Britain’s oil policy as well as broader changes within the international oil market. It argues that the story of Britain, and Britain’s two domestically-based oil companies, BP and Shell, offers a valuable case study in the development of competing ideas about the reorganization of the international oil industry in the wake of the rise of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting countries and the companies’ losing control over the production of oil.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Diplomacy
    Seton Hall Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations 400 South Orange Avenue, McQuaid Hall, South Orange, NJ 07079 Tel: 973-275-2515 Fax: 973-275-2519 Email: [email protected] http://www.journalofdiplomacy.org Seton Hall Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations is the official semi- Editor-in-Chief annual publication of the Seton Hall School Dennis Meaney of Diplomacy and International Relations at Seton Hall University. The Journal provides Deputy Editor-in-Chief a unique forum for international leaders in Michael Curtin government, the private sector, academia, and nongovernmental organizations to Executive Editor analyze and comment on international Ruthly Cadestin affairs. Editorial Media Manager Indexing: The Journal is indexed by Sajedeh Goudarzi Columbia International Affairs Online, Public Affairs Information Service, Social Media Associates International Political Science Abstracts, Patricia Zanini Graca, Juan C Garcia, America: History and Life and Historical Abstracts: International Relations and Security Network, and Ulrich’s Periodical Senior Editors Directory. Zehra Khan, Kevin Hill, Chiazam T Onyenso Manuscripts: Address all submissions to the Editor-in-Chief. We accept both hard Associate Editors copies and electronic versions. Submissions Maliheh Bitaraf, Meagan Torello, Erick may not exceed 6,000 words in length and Agbleke, Oluwagbemiga D Oyeneye, Edder must follow the Chicago manual of style. A Zarate, Emanuel Hernandez, Katherine M Submission deadlines are posted on our Landes, Troy L Dorch, Kendra Brock, Alex website. Miller, Devynn N Nolan, Lynn Wassenaar, Morgan McMichen, Eleanor Baldenweck Back Issues: Available upon request. Faculty Adviser Dr. Ann Marie Murphy The opinions expressed in the Journal are those of the contributors and should not be construed as representing those of Seton Hall University, the Seton Hall School of Diplomacy and International Relations, or the editors of the Journal.
    [Show full text]
  • Petroleum Politics: China and Its National Oil Companies
    MASTER IN ADVANCED EUROPEAN AND INTERNATIONAL STUDIES ANGLOPHONE BRANCH - Academic year 2012/2013 Master Thesis Petroleum Politics: China and Its National Oil Companies By Ellennor Grace M. FRANCISCO 26 June 2013 Supervised by: Dr. Laurent BAECHLER Deputy Director MAEIS To Whom I owe my willing and my running CONTENTS List of Tables and Figures v List of Abbreviations vi Chapter 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Literature Review 2 1.2 Methodologies 4 1.3 Objectives and Scope 4 Chapter 2. Historical Evolution of Chinese National Oil Companies 6 2.1 The Central Government and “Self-Reliance” (1950- 1977) 6 2.2 Breakdown and Corporatization: First Reform (1978- 1991) 7 2.3 Decentralization: Second Reform (1992- 2003) 11 2.4 Government Institutions and NOCs: A Move to Recentralization? (2003- 2010) 13 2.5 Corporate Governance, Ownership and Marketization 15 2.5.1 International Market 16 2.5.2 Domestic Market 17 Chapter 3. Chinese Politics and NOC Governance 19 3.1 CCP’s Controlling Mechanisms 19 3.1.1 State Assets Supervision and Administration Commission (SASAC) 19 3.1.2 Central Organization Department 21 3.2 Transference Between Government and Corporate Positions 23 3.3 Traditional Connections and the Guanxi 26 3.4 Convergence of NOC Politics 29 Chapter 4. The “Big Four”: Overview of the Chinese Banking Sector 30 Preferential Treatment 33 Chapter 5. Oil Security and The Going Out Policy 36 5.1 The Policy Driver: Equity Oil 36 5.2 The Going Out Policy (zou chu qu) 37 5.2.1 The Development of OFDI and NOCs 37 5.2.2 Trends of Outward Foreign Investments 39 5.3 State Financing: The Chinese Policy Banks 42 5.4 Loans for Oil 44 Chapter 6.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Oil, Gas Contract Negotiations in Sub-Saharan Africa
    The politics of oil, gas contract negotiations in Sub-Saharan Africa This article is part of DIIS Report 2014:25 “Policies and finance for economic development and trade” Read more at www.diis.dk THE POLITICS OF OIL, GAS CONTRACT NEGOTIATIONS IN SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA By: Rasmus Hundsbæk Pedersen, DIIS, 2014 SUMMARY Much attention has been paid to the management of revenues from petroleum resources in Sub-Saharan Africa. An entire body of literature on the resource curse has developed which points to corruption during the negotiation of contracts, as well as the mismanagement of revenues on the continent. The analyses provide the basis for policy advice for countries as well as donors; transparency and anti- corruption initiatives aimed at lifting the curse flourish. Though this paper is sympathetic to these initiatives, it argues that the analysis may underestimate the inherently political nature of the negotiation of contracts. Based on a review of the existing literature on contract negotiations in Africa, combined with a case study of Tanzania, the paper argues that the resource curse need not hit all countries on the African continent. By focusing on changes in the relative bargaining strength of actors involved in negotiating processes, it points to the choices and trade-offs that invariably affect the terms and conditions of exploration and production activities. Whereas international oil companies are often depicted as being in the driving seat, the last decade’s high oil prices may have shifted power in governments’ favor. Though their influence has declined, donors may still want to influence oil and gas politics under these circumstances.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommended Reading on Energy
    Recommended Reading on Energy John Kemp Reuters (A) Energy systems (AA) China oil, gas and coal (AAA) Climate issues and planetary change (B) Energy transitions (BB) China’s overseas energy strategy (BBB) Carbon pricing and taxation (C) Energy statistics (CC) China pollution and climate (CCC) El Nino/Southern Oscillation (D) General oil history (DD) China general history (DDD) Carbon capture and storage, synfuels (E) OPEC history (EE) South and East China Seas (EEE) Rare earths and critical minerals (F) Middle East politics (FF) India (FFF) Federal Helium Program (G) Energy and international relations (GG) Central Asia (GGG) Transport (H) Energy and public opinion (HH) Arctic issues (HHH) Aviation (I) Oil and the economy (II) Russia oil and gas (III) Maritime history (J) Energy crisis of the 1970s (JJ) North Sea oil (JJJ) Law of the Sea (K) Energy data and analysis (KK) UK oil and gas (KKK) Public policy (L) Oil exploration and production (LL) Africa resources (LLL) Risk management (M) Shale history (MM) Latin America oil and gas (MMM) Commodity price cycles (N) Fracking and shale resources (NN) Oil spills and pollution (NNN) Forecasting and analysis (O) Peak oil (OO) Natural gas and LNG (OOO) Complexity and systems theory (P) Middle East oil fields (PP) Gas as a transport fuel (PPP) Futures markets and manipulation (Q) Oil and gas leases (QQ) Natural Gas Liquids (QQQ) Regulation of commodity markets (R) Oil refining (RR) Oil and gas lending (RRR) Hedge funds and volatility (S) Oil tankers and shipping (SS) Electricity and security (SSS) Finance and markets (T) Tank farms and storage (TT) Energy efficiency (TTT) Economics and markets (U) Petroleum economics (UU) Solar activity and geomagnetic storms (UUU) Economic geography (V) Oil in wartime (VV) Renewables and grid integration (VVV) Economic history (W) Oil and gas in the United States (WW) Nuclear power and weapons (WWW) Epidemics and disease (X) Oil and gas in U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • FBI) Monograph: Soviet Intelligence Targets in the United States 1946 – 1953
    Description of document: Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) monograph: Soviet Intelligence Targets in the United States 1946 – 1953 Released date: 11-September-2008 Posted date: 24-March-2009 Source of document: Federal Bureau of Investigation Record Information/Dissemination Section 170 Marcel Drive Winchester, VA 22602-4843 The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source. Any concerns about the contents of the site should be directed to the agency originating the document in question. GovernmentAttic.org is not responsible for the contents of documents published on the website. u.s. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Investigation Washington, D. C. 20535 September 11, 2008 Subject: SOVIET INTELLIGENCE TARGETS IN THE UNITED STATES (1946-1953) FOIPA No. 1110945- 000 The enclosed documents were reviewed under the Freedom of Information/Privacy Acts (FOIPA), Title 5, United States Code, Section 552/552a.
    [Show full text]
  • This Is Guns and Butter. I Think That There's Been a Lot of Analysis With
    This is Guns and Butter. I think that there’s been a lot of analysis with regard to Iran to the extent that the Syrian War in a sense is part of the roadmap. As some analysts have underscored, the road to Tehran goes through Damascus, and consequently, the outcome of the Syrian war is crucial in defining the next stage of this broader Middle East agenda. I’m Bonnie Faulkner. Today on Guns and Butter, Michel Chossudovsky. Today’s show: Global Warfare: Is the US-NATO Going to Attack Russia? Michel Chossudovsky is an economist and the founder, director and editor of the Centre for Research on Globalization based in Montreal, Quebec. He is the author of 11 books including The Globalization of Poverty and the New World Order , War and Globalization: The Truth Behind September 11 th , America’s War on Terrorism and The Globalization of War: America’s Long War Against Humanity . Today we discuss the significance of NATO’s large-scale military exercises underway in Eastern Europe. Global warfare and nonconventional warfare, Iran and the Middle East, the Oded Yinon Plan and the strategic alliance between Russia and China within a larger global geopolitical framework. Bonnie Faulkner: Michel Chossudovsky, welcome. Michel Chossudovsky: Delighted to be on the program. Bonnie Faulkner: You have talked about Anaconda 2016, NATO’s large- scale military exercises underway in Poland. The war games, launched on Monday, June 6, will run until June 17 th . How significant are these war games? Michel Chossudovsky: They’re certainly significant but they shouldn’t be interpreted as war preparations against the Russian Federation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Status of the Water-Food-Energy Security Nexus in Asia and the Pacific Region
    UNESCAP Contract No. 6122 Index No.827239. Draft submitted by A. Hezri Adnan on …. The Status of the Water-Food-Energy Security Nexus in Asia and the Pacific region A position paper commissioned by the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific 15 MARCH 2013 0 Position Paper on the Status of the Water-Food-Energy Nexus in Asia and the Pacific region Deliverable 5: First Draft 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................ 1 2. BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................ 4 2.1. The debate on resources scarcity ................................................................................ 4 2.2. New resource realism ....................................................................................................... 5 2.3. Rationale to integrate water-energy-food ................................................................ 6 2.4. Benefits of the Nexus approach .................................................................................... 7 2.5. Report overview ................................................................................................................. 9 3. NEXUS AT THE FOREFRONT OF POLICY AND SCIENTIFIC DEBATE ................................... 9 3.1. Policy conferences .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Shale Gas Issues from Various Jurisdictions
    Shale Gas Issues From Various Jurisdictions ........................................................................................ 10 Foreword ........................................................................................................................................... 10 Calls for Moratoriums and Bans ......................................................................................................... 11 Pennsylvanians Demand Senators Declare Independence from Fracking ..................................... 11 Anti-Frackers Turn Focus On State Of Colorado After Win At Boulder County Level .................... 11 French president vows no fracking while he is president ............................................................... 11 Dear Governor Cuomo - New Yorkers Against Fracking Embedded Video ................................... 12 Fracking ban is about our water ..................................................................................................... 12 Gas drillers cancel lease with NE Pa. landowners ......................................................................... 12 Kent mayors vote for shale gas moratorium ................................................................................... 12 Contamination and Science ............................................................................................................... 14 Fracking near Shafter raises questions about drilling practices - Embedded video ........................ 14 RED WATER AND FOAM: FRACKING POLLUTION NEAR RICHWOOD,
    [Show full text]