DOCSLIB.ORG

Eceived 2280

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

NPS Form 10-900 (Oct. 1990) REECEIVED 2280 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service JAN 0 7 2009 National Register of Historic Places NAT.REGISTER OF HISTORIC PUCES Registration Form MATIONAL PARK SERVICE This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property ______________________________________ Historic name RVJohnN. Cobb Other names/site number R-552, FWS-1601 2. Location street& number NOAA NW Regional Office - 7600 Sand Point Way NE ___ not for publication city or town Seattle_________________________________ ___ vicinity State Washington code WA county __ code 033 zip code 98115-0070 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this _nomination request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property ^^ meets _ does not meet the National Register criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant __ nationally _ statewideJ!S£ locally. ( _ See continuation sheet for additional comments.) Date WASHINGTON STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE State or Federal agency and bureau In my opinion, the property X meets __ does not meet the National Register criteria. ( _ See continuation sheet for additional comments.) ^/~^5~ 2Wf State or Federal agency and bureau 4. National Park Service Certification I, hereby^ertify that this property is: _\/entered in the National Register. _ See continuation sheet __ determined eligible for the National Register. _ See continuation sheet _ determined not eligible for the National Register. _ removed from the National Register. _ other (explain:) ________ RV John N. Cobb King County, WA Page 2 of 4 5. Classification Ownership of Property Category of Property Number of Resources within Property (Check as many boxes as apply) (Check only one box (Do not incl. previously listed resources in the count.) X private building(s) Contributing Non-Contributing __ public-local district buildings public-State site sites public-Federal X structure structures object objects Total Name of related multiple property listing: Number of contributing resources previously (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing.) listed in the National Register N/A______________________________ N/A_______________ 6. Functions or Use Historic Functions Current Functions (Enter categories from instructions) (Enter categories from instructions) EDUCATION/Research Facilty EDUCATION/Research Facilty (retired) 7. Description Architectural Classification Materials (Enter categories from instructions) (Enter categories from instructions) OTHER/Floating Historic Vessel foundation (hull) WOOD walls (cabin) WOOD roof (decks) WOOD other Narrative Description (Describe the historic and current condition of the property.) SEE CONTINUATION SHEET RV John N. Cobb King County, WA Page 3 of 4 8. Statement of Significance Applicable National Register Criteria Areas of Significance (Mark "x" in one or more boxes for the criteria qualifying the (Enter categories from instructions) property for National Register listing.) Maritime History_____ X A Property is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns Architecture of our history. Science __ B Property is associated with the lives of persons significant in our past. X C Property embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values, or represents a significant Period of Significance and distinguishable entity whose components lack 1950 individual distinction. __ D Property has yielded, or is likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. Criteria Considerations (Mark "x" in all the boxes that apply.) Significant Dates 1950 Property is: A owed by a religious institution or used for religious purposes. B removed from its original location. Significant Person (Complete if Criterion B is marked above) C a birthplace or grave. D a cemetery. Cultural Affiliation E a reconstructed building, object, or structure. F a commemorative property. G less than 50 years old or achieving significance Architect/Builder within the past 50 years. W.C. Nickum & Sons (Naval Architect) Western Boat Building Company (Builder) Narrative Statement of Significance (Explain the significance of the property.) SEE CONTINUATION SHEET 9. Major Bibliographical References Bibliography (Cite the books, articles, and other sources used in preparing this form.) SEE CONTINUATION SHEET Previous documentation on file (NPS): Primary location of additional data: __ preliminary determination of individual listing __ State Historic Preservation Office (36 CFR 67) has been requested __ Other State agency __ previously listed in the National Register X Federal agency __ previously determined eligible by the National __ Local government Register __ University __ designated a National Historic Landmark __ Other #_____________ Name of repository: recorded by Historic American Engineering NOAA, NW Regional Office Record# RV John N. Cobb King County, WA Page 4 of 4 10. Geographical Data Acreage of Property Less than one acre UTM References (Place additional UTM References on a continuation sheet.) 1 I 10 55 830 52 81 912 Zone Easting Northing Zone Easting Northing Zone Easting Northing Zone Easting Northing Verbal Boundary Description (Describe the boundaries of the property.) Boundaries of NOAA Ship John N. Cobb include the footprint of the vessel and its structure above water and below waterline. Boundary Justification (Explain why the boundaries were selected.) NOAA Ship John N. Cobb is presently berthed at NOAA, Northwest Regional Office piers at 7600 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, WA. 1 1 . Form Prepared By name/title Larry E. Johnson, AIA, Principal organization The Johnson Partnership date November 12, 2008 street & number 1212 NE 65th St telephone 206-523-1618 city or town Seattle state WA zip code 98115-6724 Additional Documentation Submit the following items with the completed form: Continuation Sheets Maps A USGS map (7.5 or 15 minute series) indicating the property's location. A Sketch map for historic districts and properties having large acreage or numerous resources. Photographs Representative black and white photographs of the property. Additional items (Check with the SHPO or FPO for any additional items.) Property Owner (Complete this item at the request of the SHPO or FPO.)_______________________ name National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Marine Operations Center, atm: Capt. Michele. G. Bullock________________________ street & number 1801 Fairview Avenue E telephone 206-553-7656 city or town Seattle_______________ state WA zip code 98102 NFS Form 10-900a OMB No. 1024-0018 (Rev. 8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet - R/V JOHN N. COBB KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON Section number 7 Page 1 of 6 Narrative Description The NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) ship John N. Cobb was designed as a modified West Coast wooden-hulled purse-seiner in 1949, specifically for fisheries research. Her length overall (LOA) is 93 feet 3 1A inches (28.4 m), with a length on water line of 85 feet (25.9 m), a beam over guards at 25 feet 6 % inches (7.8 m), and 24 feet 6 inches (7.5 m) in beam moulded at the main deck. She has a maximum draft of approximately 11.0 feet (3.4 m) and a displacement of 250 tons. Gross tonnage is rated at 185 tons, with 78 tons net tonnage. John N. Cobb retains her original eight-cylinder Fairbanks-Morse diesel engine (presently inoperable). The 350-horse power engine at 380 revolutions per minute (RPM), turning a single three-blade 5-foot diameter propeller, formerly gave the vessel a cruising speed of 10 knots (11 miles per hour). With a fuel capacity of 8,000 gallons, she had a cruising range of approximately 2,850 nautical miles. 1 NOAA retired the vessel on August 14, 2008.2 When active, John N. Cobb had a complement of two officers, two licensed engineers, a crew of four, and generally accommodated four scientific researchers.3 The vessel retains a high degree of integrity, despite some equipment upgrades for increased navigational and crew safety, and changing mission requirements. Hull Description John N. Cobb was designed for commercial level use with heavy scantlings. All scantlings and planking are of vertical grain Douglas fir. Futtock timbers (frames) are double 3 5/8-inch thick flitches (long and short arm method) spaced at 18 inches on center fastened with 5/8-inch galvanized carriage bolts spaced at 18 inches on center (doubled at butts). Hull planking is 2 5/8-inches net throughout, fastened with four 3/8-inch galvanized ship spikes per plank per frame (spikes were let-in and counter-bored with wood plugs above waterline and cement below waterline.) Garboard planking is 3 5/8 inch x 11 !/2 inches. Her keel is 13 % inches by 13 l/2 inches extending full-length (without a scarf joint). The keel is fastened to the frames by double %-inch carriage bolts and through the frames to the 13 /4-inch x 13 H-inch keelson with double 7/8-inch carriage bolts. There is a sister keelson on either side of the keelson. The cavity between the frames below the keelson is filled with concrete.
Recommended publications
  • SUSTAINABLE FISHERIES and RESPONSIBLE AQUACULTURE: a Guide for USAID Staff and Partners

    SUSTAINABLE FISHERIES and RESPONSIBLE AQUACULTURE: a Guide for USAID Staff and Partners

    SUSTAINABLE FISHERIES AND RESPONSIBLE AQUACULTURE: A Guide for USAID Staff and Partners June 2013 ABOUT THIS GUIDE GOAL This guide provides basic information on how to design programs to reform capture fisheries (also referred to as “wild” fisheries) and aquaculture sectors to ensure sound and effective development, environmental sustainability, economic profitability, and social responsibility. To achieve these objectives, this document focuses on ways to reduce the threats to biodiversity and ecosystem productivity through improved governance and more integrated planning and management practices. In the face of food insecurity, global climate change, and increasing population pressures, it is imperative that development programs help to maintain ecosystem resilience and the multiple goods and services that ecosystems provide. Conserving biodiversity and ecosystem functions are central to maintaining ecosystem integrity, health, and productivity. The intent of the guide is not to suggest that fisheries and aquaculture are interchangeable: these sectors are unique although linked. The world cannot afford to neglect global fisheries and expect aquaculture to fill that void. Global food security will not be achievable without reversing the decline of fisheries, restoring fisheries productivity, and moving towards more environmentally friendly and responsible aquaculture. There is a need for reform in both fisheries and aquaculture to reduce their environmental and social impacts. USAID’s experience has shown that well-designed programs can reform capture fisheries management, reducing threats to biodiversity while leading to increased productivity, incomes, and livelihoods. Agency programs have focused on an ecosystem-based approach to management in conjunction with improved governance, secure tenure and access to resources, and the application of modern management practices.
  • Recirculating Aquaculture Tank Production Systems: Aquaponics—Integrating Fish and Plant Culture

    Recirculating Aquaculture Tank Production Systems: Aquaponics—Integrating Fish and Plant Culture

    SRAC Publication No. 454 November 2006 VI Revision PR Recirculating Aquaculture Tank Production Systems: Aquaponics—Integrating Fish and Plant Culture James E. Rakocy1, Michael P. Masser2 and Thomas M. Losordo3 Aquaponics, the combined culture of many times, non-toxic nutrients and Aquaponic systems offer several ben- fish and plants in recirculating sys- organic matter accumulate. These efits. Dissolved waste nutrients are tems, has become increasingly popu- metabolic by-products need not be recovered by the plants, reducing dis- lar. Now a news group (aquaponics- wasted if they are channeled into charge to the environment and [email protected] — type sub- secondary crops that have economic extending water use (i.e., by remov- scribe) on the Internet discusses value or in some way benefit the pri- ing dissolved nutrients through plant many aspects of aquaponics on a mary fish production system. uptake, the water exchange rate can daily basis. Since 1997, a quarterly Systems that grow additional crops be reduced). Minimizing water periodical (Aquaponics Journal) has by utilizing by-products from the pro- exchange reduces the costs of operat- published informative articles, con- duction of the primary species are ing aquaponic systems in arid cli- ference announcements and product referred to as integrated systems. If mates and heated greenhouses where advertisements. At least two large the secondary crops are aquatic or water or heated water is a significant suppliers of aquaculture and/or terrestrial plants grown in conjunc- expense. Having a secondary plant hydroponic equipment have intro- tion with fish, this integrated system crop that receives most of its required duced aquaponic systems to their is referred to as an aquaponic system catalogs.
  • Overview of the Potential Interactions and Impacts of Commercial Fishing Methods on Marine Habitats and Species Protected Under the Eu Habitats Directive

    Overview of the Potential Interactions and Impacts of Commercial Fishing Methods on Marine Habitats and Species Protected Under the Eu Habitats Directive

    THE N2K GROUP European Economic Interest Group OVERVIEW OF THE POTENTIAL INTERACTIONS AND IMPACTS OF COMMERCIAL FISHING METHODS ON MARINE HABITATS AND SPECIES PROTECTED UNDER THE EU HABITATS DIRECTIVE Contents GLOSSARY................................................................................................................................................3 1. BACKGROUND.................................................................................................................................6 1.1 Fisheries interactions ....................................................................................................................7 2. FISHERIES AND NATURA 2000 - PRESSURES, INTERACTIONS, AND IMPACTS ....................................8 2.1 POTENTIAL PHYSICAL, CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL PRESSURES AND IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH COMMERCIAL FISHING METHODS ............................................................................................8 DREDGES .......................................................................................................................................11 TRAWL - PELAGIC ..........................................................................................................................12 HOOK & LINE.................................................................................................................................12 TRAPS ............................................................................................................................................12 NETS ..............................................................................................................................................13
  • MV KALAKALA Other Names/Site Number Ferry PERALTA 2

    MV KALAKALA Other Names/Site Number Ferry PERALTA 2

    NPS Form 10-900 (Oct. 1990) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropne box or by entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property________________________________________ __ Historic name MV KALAKALA Other names/site number Ferry PERALTA 2. Location street & number Hylebos Creek Waterway, 1801 Taylor Way _____ not for publication city or town Tacorna_______________________ ___ vicinity State Washington code WA county Pierce_____ code 053 zip code 98421 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this _X nomination _ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Wsjpric Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property^C meets _ does not meet the National Register criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant _ nationally y^statewide _ locally.
  • Australian Fisheries and Aquaculture Statistics 2015

    Australian Fisheries and Aquaculture Statistics 2015

    Department of Agriculture and Water Resources Australian fisheries and aquaculture statistics 2015 Research by the Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences DECEMBER 2016 ABARES i Australian fisheries and aquaculture statistics 2015 © Commonwealth of Australia 2016 Ownership of intellectual property rights The Australian Government acting through the Department Unless otherwise noted, copyright (and any other intellectual of Agriculture and Water Resources, represented by the property rights, if any) in this publication is owned by the Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics Commonwealth of Australia (referred to as the Commonwealth). and Sciences, has exercised due care and skill in preparing and compiling the information and data in this publication. Creative Commons licence Notwithstanding, the Department of Agriculture and Water All material in this publication is licensed under a Creative Resources, ABARES, its employees and advisers disclaim all Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence, save for content liability, including for negligence and for any loss, damage, supplied by third parties, logos and the Commonwealth Coat injury, expense or cost incurred by any person as a result of Arms. of accessing, using or relying on information or data in this publication to the maximum extent permitted by law. Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence is a Acknowledgements standard form licence agreement that allows you to copy, distribute, transmit and adapt this publication provided you attribute the work. A summary of the licence terms is available from creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ au/deed.en. The full licence terms are available from ABARES thanks state and territory fisheries departments and creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/legalcode.
  • Pottawatomie County Is Home to Aquaponics Farm

    Pottawatomie County Is Home to Aquaponics Farm

    Pottawatomie County is home to aquaponics farm By Donna Sullivan, Editor Once the fry are hatched, What began as an effort Sperman uses a net to scoop to ensure his diabetic father a them into a bucket to trans- reliable protein supply if port to fry pools. The bread availability to his medication and butter of his business is were interrupted has grown selling three-quarter to one- into a growing business ven- inch fry in bulk. “When fry ture for Pottawatomie Coun- are the size of mosquito lar- ty resident James Sperman. vae, they’re not the most re- Travelers along Highway 24 silient things in the world,” between Manhattan and he said. So he waits about Wamego may have noticed two weeks for them to grow the high tunnel, semi-pit to around an inch, then ships greenhouse and large blue them nationwide. “None of pools that house his my fish go to waste,” he con- aquaponic gardening system tinued. “The ones that I and tilapia farm. don’t manage to find homes Aquaponics combines for can grow and become fish farming with hydropon- adolescents and some are ic gardening inside a high just on the verge of becom- tunnel, which allows for the ing breeders and will be- production of fruits, vegeta- come pond stockers.” bles and fish year-round. The Sperman says that be- system has a 1,700-gallon cause tilapia are predomi- fish tank and 165-square- nantly vegetarian and are fil- foot grow bed. Water from ter feeders, the algae and the fish tank carries fish bacteria that grows in the waste to the grow bed, where James Sperman describes how he feeds the fish at only one end of the pond since the females release their eggs pools is tailored perfectly to it feeds the plants.
  • FISHING NEWSLETTER 2020/2021 Table of Contents FWP Administrative Regions and Hatchery Locations

    FISHING NEWSLETTER 2020/2021 Table of Contents FWP Administrative Regions and Hatchery Locations

    FISHING NEWSLETTER 2020/2021 Table of Contents FWP Administrative Regions and Hatchery Locations .........................................................................................3 Region 1 Reports: Northwest Montana ..........................................................................................................5 Region 2 Reports: West Central Montana .....................................................................................................17 Region 3 Reports: Southwest Montana ........................................................................................................34 Region 4 Reports: North Central Montana ...................................................................................................44 Region 5 Reports: South Central Montana ...................................................................................................65 Region 6 Reports: Northeast Montana ........................................................................................................73 Region 7 Reports: Southeast Montana .........................................................................................................86 Montana Fish Hatchery Reports: .......................................................................................................................92 Murray Springs Trout Hatchery ...................................................................................................................92 Washoe Park Trout Hatchery .......................................................................................................................93
  • Pacific Motor Boat Design Pacific Motor Boat Design Rick Etsell, Naval Architect

    Pacific Motor Boat Design Pacific Motor Boat Design Rick Etsell, Naval Architect

    6/7/13 Fantail Motoryachts | Pacific Motor Boat Design Pacific Motor Boat Design Rick Etsell, naval architect Fantail Motoryachts The Great Fantail Motoryachts of the Pacific Northwest by Rick Etsell Fantail: the overhanging part of a ship's stern, a term used particularly in the case of large yachts and passenger liners. Although the correct word for the stern overhang of all ships, it is not often used in this connection except in the U.S.A. It has not quite the same meaning as counter, but comes very close to it. [The Oxford Companion to Ships and the Sea, Kemp, editor, 1976, Oxford University Press] Fantail: The aftermost part of a ship, usually of the main deck; at the extreme stern. This word is believed to be purely American, from the early days of elliptical (fan-shaped) sterns, the mid XIX. [Origins of Sea Terms, John G. Rogers, Mystic Seaport Museum, Inc., 1985 (2nd ed.)] These definitions don't do justice to the grand image of the classic fantail motoryacht. A very popular style for yachts built in the Roaring Twenties, the fantail stern evoked images of the grand trans-Atlantic liners and provided a perfect platform for elegant parties or breakfast at anchor on a quiet summer morning. Of course, it's not just the stern shape that is important. Coupled with a plumb bow, stately cabins and a purposeful wheelhouse, the result was an efficient and comfortable cruiser at home in any marine setting. Malibu -- Original Configuration Some Well-Known Fantails: Click on the thumbnails to view the larger images.
  • Port Master Plan Amendment No. 27 (North Embarcadero)

    Port Master Plan Amendment No. 27 (North Embarcadero)

    STATE OF cw,JFORNIA-THE RESOURCES AGENCY _,;. ,_ CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION SAN DII!GO AREA 7575 METROPOLITAN DRIVE, SUITE 103 II!GO, CA 92108-4402 RECORD PACKET COPY 67-2370 • W19b February 21, 2000 TO: COMMISSIONERS AND INTERESTED PERSONS FROM: DEBORAH N. LEE, SOUTH COAST DEPUTY DIRECTOR SHERILYN SARB, DISTRICT MANAGER, SAN DIEGO DISTRICT DIANA LILLY, COASTAL PLANNER, SAN DIEGO DISTRICT SUBJECT: Staff Recommendation on San Diego Unified Port District Port Master Plan Amendment No. 27 (North Embarcadero). For Commission consideration and possible action at the Meeting of March 13-16, 2001) SUMMARY OF STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff is recommending that the Commission approve, in part, and deny, in part, the proposed amendment to the certified Port District Master Plan which would allow for the following development within the area of San Diego's waterfront known as North Embarcadero. The plan would allow the construction of a 600-800 room hotel, office building, retail and parking facilities on the old Lane Field site; the narrowing of Harbor Drive from four lanes to three between Grape Street and Pacific Highway; the extension • of B and C Streets between Pacific Highway and North Harbor Drive; construction of a new 25-foot wide pedestrian esplanade along the water's edge at Harbor Drive; the replacement of 3 existing industrial piers with one new public pier at Grape Street; construction of a small commercial recreation facility on the new Grape Street Pier; construction of a restaurant on the bayfront inland of the Grape Street Pier; modernization of the cruise ship terminal at the B Street Pier, including an increase of building height up to 50 feet; and docking the U.S.S.
  • Wang P.E.1, M

    Wang P.E.1, M

    DESIGN OF THE CAMPBELL SHIPYARD SEDIMENT REMEDIATION PROJECT, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA T. S. Wang P.E.1, M. Whelan P.E.2, D. Keith R.G.3, J. Verduin P.E.4 and P. Brown5 ABSTRACT The former Campbell Shipyard site is located on San Diego Bay and owned by the Port of San Diego. In 1995, the California State Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) issued a Cleanup and Abatement Order (CAO) requiring cleanup of sediments over approximately 3.7 hectares (9.2 acres) offshore of the site, due to the presence of metals, hydrocarbons, PAHs, PCBs and TBT. In-place capping of impacted sediments with targeted dredging was selected as the preferred remedy due to its environmental protectiveness, constructability, cost-effectiveness, and consistency with current and planned site uses. The Campbell Shipyard remedial design needed to account for the fact that the site is in an active industrial area with regular vessel activities, and also needed to address the concerns of multiple stakeholders. In particular, the design needed to account for a number of key technical challenges: - Designing a clean sediment cap to isolate underlying chemicals from the environment and the water column. - Protecting the cap against potential erosion from vessel-generated propeller wash, ship generated waves, tidal currents and wind-waves. - Providing sufficient water depths for ongoing container ship operations at the adjacent Tenth Avenue Marine Terminal (TAMT). - Ensuring that the project could be successfully constructed without impeding (or being impacted by) traffic to and from the TAMT facility. - Providing mitigation for loss of existing eelgrass beds and creating a stable, protected area at shallow subtidal elevations for this purpose.
  • General Disclaimer One Or More of the Following Statements May Affect

    General Disclaimer One Or More of the Following Statements May Affect

    General Disclaimer One or more of the Following Statements may affect this Document This document has been reproduced from the best copy furnished by the organizational source. It is being released in the interest of making available as much information as possible. This document may contain data, which exceeds the sheet parameters. It was furnished in this condition by the organizational source and is the best copy available. This document may contain tone-on-tone or color graphs, charts and/or pictures, which have been reproduced in black and white. This document is paginated as submitted by the original source. Portions of this document are not fully legible due to the historical nature of some of the material. However, it is the best reproduction available from the original submission. Produced by the NASA Center for Aerospace Information (CASI) Y C y F SPACE BENEFITS THE SECONDARY APPLICATION OF AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY IN OTHER SECTORS OF THE ECONOMY N76-29060 (NASA-CR- 14850 9) BENEFITS BRIEFING NOTEBOOK: THE SECONDARY APPLICATION OF AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY IN OTHER SECTORS O^GTHE 4 Linclas ECONOMY (Denver Pesearch Ynst.) 17 CSCL 05A G3/85 15291 %6.75 o APR 1976 RECE; VEQ NASA sr! FAcrtiy C-, N/%SA National Aeronautics and Space Administration 76 -1 L NASA :BENSF'ITS BRIEFING NOTEBOOK - Prepared for The Technolog3r Utilization Office (code KT) National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contract NASW-2607 rrc T PREFACE This 'Benefits Briefing Notebook" has been prepared for the NASA Technology Utiliza ion Office by the Denver Research Institute, "Program for Transfer Research and Impact Studies,, to provide the Agency with accurate, conven- ient, and integrated resource information on the transfer of aerospace tech- nology to other sectors of the U.S.
  • Community Plan Barrio Logan Harbor 101 Community Plan

    Community Plan Barrio Logan Harbor 101 Community Plan

    Barrio Logan Harbor 101 Community Plan Barrio Logan Harbor 101 Community Plan City of San Diego Planning Department 202 C Street, MS 4A San Diego, CA 92101 Printed on recycled paper. This information, or this document (or portions thereof), will be made available in alternative formats upon request. - i - Barrio Logan / Harbor 101 Community Plan The following information has been incorporated into this November 2005 posting of this Plan: Date Approved by Resolution Date Adopted by Resolution Amendment Planning Commission Number City Council Number Barrio Logan/Harbor 101 November 30, 1978 Community Plan Adopted. Certified by the California Coastal Commission on November 9, 1979 Amendment in June 10, 1982 3910 November 9, 1982 R-257473 conjunction with adoption of the PDO Certified by the California Coastal Commission on February 23, 1983 Amendment in April 25, 1991 May 7, 1991 R-277878 conjunction with the adoption of the Barrio Logan Redevelopment Plan - ii - November 30, 1978 The Honorable Mayor and City Council The City Planning Commission City of San Diego, California I am pleased to present to you the accompanying Barrio Logan/Harbor 101 Community Plan (Plan). This Plan represents a comprehensive guide for the maintenance, upgrading and future development of the Barrio Logan/Harbor 101 community through 1995. Much of this Plan’s proposals and information have been based on a previous comprehensive consultant study; “The Barrio Logan/Harbor 101 Community Improvement Study” a consultant joint venture of Simpson Gerber and Bundy, and the Chicano Federation of San Diego, Inc. Upon Council acceptance of this study, the Planning Department was directed to prepare a community plan for the Barrio Logan/Harbor 101 Area.