DOCSLIB.ORG

Senate Hearings Before the Committee on Appropriations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

S. HRG. 110–442 Senate Hearings Before the Committee on Appropriations Energy and Water Development Appropriations Fiscal Year 2008 110th CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION H.R. 2641/S. 1751 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE—CIVIL DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NONDEPARTMENTAL WITNESSES Energy and Water Development Appropriations, 2008 (H.R. 2641/S. 1751) S. HRG. 110–442 ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2008 HEARINGS BEFORE A SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED TENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION ON H.R. 2641/S. 1751 AN ACT MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOP- MENT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2008, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES Department of Defense—Civil Department of Energy Department of the Interior Nondepartmental Witnesses Printed for the use of the Committee on Appropriations ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.gpoaccess.gov/congress/index.html U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 33–914 PDF WASHINGTON : 2008 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS ROBERT C. BYRD, West Virginia, Chairman DANIEL K. INOUYE, Hawaii THAD COCHRAN, Mississippi PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont TED STEVENS, Alaska TOM HARKIN, Iowa ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania BARBARA A. MIKULSKI, Maryland PETE V. DOMENICI, New Mexico HERB KOHL, Wisconsin CHRISTOPHER S. BOND, Missouri PATTY MURRAY, Washington MITCH MCCONNELL, Kentucky BYRON L. DORGAN, North Dakota RICHARD C. SHELBY, Alabama DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California JUDD GREGG, New Hampshire RICHARD J. DURBIN, Illinois ROBERT F. BENNETT, Utah TIM JOHNSON, South Dakota LARRY CRAIG, Idaho MARY L. LANDRIEU, Louisiana KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON, Texas JACK REED, Rhode Island SAM BROWNBACK, Kansas FRANK R. LAUTENBERG, New Jersey WAYNE ALLARD, Colorado BEN NELSON, Nebraska LAMAR ALEXANDER, Tennessee TERRENCE E. SAUVAIN, Staff Director BRUCE EVANS, Minority Staff Director SUBCOMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT BYRON L. DORGAN, North Dakota, Chairman ROBERT C. BYRD, West Virginia PETE V. DOMENICI, New Mexico PATTY MURRAY, Washington THAD COCHRAN, Mississippi DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California MITCH MCCONNELL, Kentucky TIM JOHNSON, South Dakota ROBERT F. BENNETT, Utah MARY L. LANDRIEU, Louisiana LARRY CRAIG, Idaho DANIEL K. INOUYE, Hawaii CHRISTOPHER S. BOND, Missouri JACK REED, Rhode Island KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON, Texas FRANK R. LAUTENBERG, New Jersey WAYNE ALLARD, Colorado Professional Staff DOUG CLAPP ROGER COCKRELL FRANZ WUERFMANNSDOBLER SCOTT O’MALIA (Minority) BRAD FULLER (Minority) Administrative Support ROBERT RICH (II) CONTENTS Page WEDNESDAY, MARCH 7, 2007 Department of Energy: Office of Environmental Management ............................................................ 1 Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management ........................................ 20 THURSDAY, MARCH 15, 2007 Department of Defense—Civil: Department of the Army: Corps of Engineers— Civil ....................................................................................................................... 53 Department of the Interior: Bureau of Reclamation ............................................. 74 WEDNESDAY, MARCH 21, 2007 Department of Energy: Office of Science ............................................................... 167 WEDNESDAY, APRIL 11, 2007 Department of Energy ............................................................................................. 221 WEDNESDAY, APRIL 18, 2007 Department of Energy: National Nuclear Security Administration .................... 321 NONDEPARTMENTAL WITNESSES Department of Defense—Civil: Department of the Army: Corps of Engineers— Civil ....................................................................................................................... 393 Department of the Interior: Bureau of Reclamation ............................................. 460 Department of Energy ............................................................................................. 487 (III) ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2008 WEDNESDAY, MARCH 7, 2007 U.S. SENATE, SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS, Washington, DC. The subcommittee met at 2:21 p.m., in room SD–138, Dirksen Senate Office Building, Hon. Byron L. Dorgan (chairman) pre- siding. Present: Senators Dorgan, Murray, Domenici, Bennett, Craig, and Allard. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT STATEMENT OF HON. JAMES A. RISPOLI, ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF ENERGY FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT OPENING STATEMENT OF SENATOR BYRON L. DORGAN Senator DORGAN. I call the hearing to order. Let me apologize for the delay, but we have had two votes on the floor of the Senate and they are just finishing. This is the first hearing of the Energy and Water Subcommittee this year and the first since I have assumed the chairmanship, and I am pleased to be in this role and working on so many interesting and divergent issues. I am also pleased to be working with my col- league Senator Domenici. I visited the National Laboratory at Sandia in New Mexico with Senator Domenici 2 weeks ago. I saw some of the scope of the subcommittee’s jurisdiction during that visit and was very impressed, very interested. Today we have two important programs to hear from, the Office of Environmental Management and the Office of Civilian Radio- active Waste Management. I am going to put most of my opening statement into the record so that we can hear the witnesses, but let me say that the Radioactive Waste Office has the immediate task of submitting a license for the Yucca Mountain waste reposi- tory to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission by June 2008. The En- vironmental Management Office has the immediate and long-term task of cleaning up the contamination from nuclear weapons facili- ties that date back to the Second World War. It is clear to me as I look at the budget that we have some very serious budget prob- lems and we will evaluate some of those today. (1) 2 PREPARED STATEMENT I am going to put the rest of my statement in the record. I will be using a portion of that discussion during the question period. I want to thank both Mr. Sproat and Mr. Rispoli for being with us today. [The statement follows:] PREPARED STATEMENT OF SENATOR BYRON L. DORGAN The hearing will come to order. Thank you all for being here today. This is the first hearing of the Energy and Water Subcommittee this year and the first of my chairmanship. I am happy to be in this role and excited by the prospect of working on so many interesting and divergent issues. I am also pleased to be working with my colleague, and long-time chairman of this subcommittee, Senator Domenici. I visited Sandia National Laboratory in New Mexico with Senator Domenici two weeks ago. During that visit I saw some of the scope of this subcommittee’s jurisdiction and my colleague’s wealth of experience on these matters. Today, we have two important programs to hear from—the Office of Environ- mental Management and the Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management. The Radioactive Waste office has the immediate task of submitting a license for the Yucca Mountain waste repository to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission by June, 2008. The Environmental Management (EM) office has the immediate and long-term task of cleaning up the contamination from nuclear weapon facilities that date back to World War II. It is clear the proposed budget for the EM program is inadequate. The EM program has recognized the shortfall in requested funding and has pro- posed to focus fiscal year 2008 cleanup on the highest risk activities across the com- plex. This is obviously wise. But I’m concerned by the budget’s implied premise that it is okay to delay ad- dressing lower risk activities. It is very clear that this budget will lead to missed milestones set out in cleanup agreements with the States. In fact, the Department is already stating it intends to work with the States to modify these cleanup agreements. I find it unfortunate that the administration proposes to modify cleanup agree- ments based purely upon lack of funding. Nuclear waste cleanup is difficult work involving some of the most dangerous ma- terials on earth. We all understand that difficulties arise in this type of work that leads to missed milestones. But, as I understand it, the States are often understanding in these circumstances and have agreed to make changes to the agreements when legitimate obstacles to cleanup have arisen. It seems too much to ask that States agree to milestone changes simply because the Federal Government proposes to short-change such an important program. I’m also concerned by a fiscal year 2008 budget document statement that says the life-cycle cost of the EM program is estimated to have increased by $50 billion. We need a better explanation for this estimated cost increase and what the De- partment is doing to reverse this escalation. The Department of Energy’s own website has a section on the history of the EM program and its origins in the weapons programs that produced the contamination. The website notes that scientists in the weapons program early on advised that the resulting waste stream presented grave problems. DOE’s website then notes, ‘‘The imperatives of the nuclear arms race, however, demanded that weapons production and testing be given priority over waste man- agement and the control of environmental
Recommended publications
  • Fulmer Creek Basin Assessment

    Fulmer Creek Basin Assessment

    EMERGENCY TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE RECOVERY WATER BASIN ASSESSMENT AND FLOOD HAZARD MITIGATION ALTERNATIVES FULMER CREEK HERKIMER COUNTY, NEW YORK April 2014 MMI #5231-01 Photo Source: Milone and MacBroom, Inc. (2013) This document was prepared for the New York State Department of Transportation, In cooperation with the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Prepared by: MILONE & MACBROOM, INC. 134 Main Street, Suite A1 New Paltz, NY 12561 (845) 633-8153 www.miloneandmacbroom.com Copyright 2014 Milone & MacBroom, Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Project Background ...................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Nomenclature ............................................................................................................... 3 2.0 DATA COLLECTION .......................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Initial Data Collection .................................................................................................. 3 2.2 Public Outreach ............................................................................................................ 3 2.3 Field Assessment .......................................................................................................... 3 2.4 Watershed Land Use ...................................................................................................
  • Mohawk River Watershed – HUC-12

    Mohawk River Watershed – HUC-12

    ID Number Name of Mohawk Watershed 1 Switz Kill 2 Flat Creek 3 Headwaters West Creek 4 Kayaderosseras Creek 5 Little Schoharie Creek 6 Headwaters Mohawk River 7 Headwaters Cayadutta Creek 8 Lansing Kill 9 North Creek 10 Little West Kill 11 Irish Creek 12 Auries Creek 13 Panther Creek 14 Hinckley Reservoir 15 Nowadaga Creek 16 Wheelers Creek 17 Middle Canajoharie Creek 18 Honnedaga 19 Roberts Creek 20 Headwaters Otsquago Creek 21 Mill Creek 22 Lewis Creek 23 Upper East Canada Creek 24 Shakers Creek 25 King Creek 26 Crane Creek 27 South Chuctanunda Creek 28 Middle Sprite Creek 29 Crum Creek 30 Upper Canajoharie Creek 31 Manor Kill 32 Vly Brook 33 West Kill 34 Headwaters Batavia Kill 35 Headwaters Flat Creek 36 Sterling Creek 37 Lower Ninemile Creek 38 Moyer Creek 39 Sixmile Creek 40 Cincinnati Creek 41 Reall Creek 42 Fourmile Brook 43 Poentic Kill 44 Wilsey Creek 45 Lower East Canada Creek 46 Middle Ninemile Creek 47 Gooseberry Creek 48 Mother Creek 49 Mud Creek 50 North Chuctanunda Creek 51 Wharton Hollow Creek 52 Wells Creek 53 Sandsea Kill 54 Middle East Canada Creek 55 Beaver Brook 56 Ferguson Creek 57 West Creek 58 Fort Plain 59 Ox Kill 60 Huntersfield Creek 61 Platter Kill 62 Headwaters Oriskany Creek 63 West Kill 64 Headwaters South Branch West Canada Creek 65 Fly Creek 66 Headwaters Alplaus Kill 67 Punch Kill 68 Schenevus Creek 69 Deans Creek 70 Evas Kill 71 Cripplebush Creek 72 Zimmerman Creek 73 Big Brook 74 North Creek 75 Upper Ninemile Creek 76 Yatesville Creek 77 Concklin Brook 78 Peck Lake-Caroga Creek 79 Metcalf Brook 80 Indian
  • Senate MONDAY, DECEMBER 10, 2012

    Senate MONDAY, DECEMBER 10, 2012

    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 112 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 158 WASHINGTON, MONDAY, DECEMBER 10, 2012 No. 158 House of Representatives The House was not in session today. Its next meeting will be held on Tuesday, December 11, 2012, at 12 p.m. Senate MONDAY, DECEMBER 10, 2012 The Senate met at 2 p.m. and was to the Senate from the President pro longest serving Senator from Vermont, called to order by the Honorable PAT- tempore (Mr. INOUYE). a man of such quality. Those of us who RICK J. LEAHY, a Senator from the The legislative clerk read the fol- work with the chairman of the Judici- State of Vermont. lowing letter: ary Committee, Senator LEAHY of U.S. SENATE, Vermont, consider it an honor to be PRAYER PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE, Washington, DC, December 10, 2012. able to talk to him—speaking for my- The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, of- self, but I am sure we all feel this fered the following prayer: To the Senate: Under the provisions of rule I, paragraph 3, way—and to learn from him. I am the Let us pray. of the Standing Rules of the Senate, I hereby Almighty and everlasting God, who majority leader in the Senate, but I appoint the Honorable PATRICK J. LEAHY, a talk to my friend from Vermont often forgives the sins of the penitent, create Senator from the State of Vermont, to per- in us contrite hearts and renew a right form the duties of the Chair.
  • Waterbody Classifications, Streams Based on Waterbody Classifications

    Waterbody Classifications, Streams Based on Waterbody Classifications

    Waterbody Classifications, Streams Based on Waterbody Classifications Waterbody Type Segment ID Waterbody Index Number (WIN) Streams 0202-0047 Pa-63-30 Streams 0202-0048 Pa-63-33 Streams 0801-0419 Ont 19- 94- 1-P922- Streams 0201-0034 Pa-53-21 Streams 0801-0422 Ont 19- 98 Streams 0801-0423 Ont 19- 99 Streams 0801-0424 Ont 19-103 Streams 0801-0429 Ont 19-104- 3 Streams 0801-0442 Ont 19-105 thru 112 Streams 0801-0445 Ont 19-114 Streams 0801-0447 Ont 19-119 Streams 0801-0452 Ont 19-P1007- Streams 1001-0017 C- 86 Streams 1001-0018 C- 5 thru 13 Streams 1001-0019 C- 14 Streams 1001-0022 C- 57 thru 95 (selected) Streams 1001-0023 C- 73 Streams 1001-0024 C- 80 Streams 1001-0025 C- 86-3 Streams 1001-0026 C- 86-5 Page 1 of 464 09/28/2021 Waterbody Classifications, Streams Based on Waterbody Classifications Name Description Clear Creek and tribs entire stream and tribs Mud Creek and tribs entire stream and tribs Tribs to Long Lake total length of all tribs to lake Little Valley Creek, Upper, and tribs stream and tribs, above Elkdale Kents Creek and tribs entire stream and tribs Crystal Creek, Upper, and tribs stream and tribs, above Forestport Alder Creek and tribs entire stream and tribs Bear Creek and tribs entire stream and tribs Minor Tribs to Kayuta Lake total length of select tribs to the lake Little Black Creek, Upper, and tribs stream and tribs, above Wheelertown Twin Lakes Stream and tribs entire stream and tribs Tribs to North Lake total length of all tribs to lake Mill Brook and minor tribs entire stream and selected tribs Riley Brook
  • Accentuating the Positive in Nebraska's GOP Race for Governor

    Accentuating the Positive in Nebraska's GOP Race for Governor

    July 1, 1998 Accentuating the Positive in Nebraska's GOP Race for Governor Bob Wickers Mike Johanns was outspent by $2 million, never mentioned his opponents' names on TV - and won a big primary victory We started the campaign knowing three things: 1) We were going to be considerably outspent by both of our opponents; 2) We were going to build a grassroots organization in all 93 counties throughout Nebraska and 3) We were going to stay positive no matter what. On primary night, Tuesday, May 12th, we stood in a packed hotel ballroom in Lincoln, Nebraska. The room was overflowing with campaign workers, reporters and supporters, all waiting for the imminent arrival of Mike Johanns, whom the Associated Press had just declared the winner in the Republican primary for governor. There were cell phones ringing and reporters going live on the air, and the moment when Mike, his wife Stephanie, and children Michaela and Justin finally walked in, the crowd erupted into cheers and applause that could be heard from Omaha to Scottsbluff. We were reminded of the day when we first met Mike Johanns, more than a year earlier, when this night seemed a long way off. In the spring of 1997, we had traveled to Lincoln to meet Johanns. As the mayor of Lincoln, he had earned respect and accolades for his conservative leadership style and ability to get things done. The city had experienced unprecedented economic growth and enjoyed a AAA bond rating while seeing cuts in property taxes and an increased number of police on the streets.
  • Resilient NY Program

    Resilient NY Program

    1 Resilient NY Program October 29, 2019 Thomas R. Snow Jr. New York City Watershed and Flood Resiliency Programs 2 Resilient NY Program Flood/Ice Jam studies - • Includes 48 high-priority watersheds across NYS § Comprehensive hydrologic and hydraulic analysis (HEC-RAS) and ice jams (where applicable); § Fluvial geomorphic assessment; § Current and future flood flows due to climate change will be evaluated; and § Reports will include specific project recommendations to mitigate flooding and ice jams. 3 4 Hudson River Watershed - Wappinger Creek – Dutchess County Roeliff Jansen Kill – Dutchess/Columbia Main Street Brook – Ulster County Catskill Creek – Greene County Stockport Creek – Columbia/Rensselaer 5 How where these watersheds chosen? • # of Repetitive Losses/community (FEMA information). • # Repetitive Losses/stream (FEMA/DEC information); • Total $ flood insurance payment (FEMA information); • DEC technical staff; • Consultation with Departments of Homeland Security and EmerGency Services and State; and • County Soil and Water Conservation District staff. 6 Flooding - • An unfortunate reality in and near riverine areas across NYS • Most recent catastrophic floods 2006, 2011, 2012 and 2013 • Isolated storms § July 2017 – Town of Whitestown/Village of Whitesboro, Hoosick Falls • Ice jam flooding is also a common occurrence 7 Mohawk River Watershed Flooding • In 2013/14, completed 13 state-of- the-art flood studies completed in high priority watersheds § 4 - Oneida County § 8 – Herkimer § 1 – Montgomery • Schoharie Creek – initiated
  • Congressional Record—House H7878

    Congressional Record—House H7878

    H7878 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE July 17, 2007 center even exists. We don’t know if it The Acting CHAIRMAN. Pursuant to modifications committed to conference: even exists, if it’s created by this ear- clause 6 of rule XVIII, further pro- Messrs. Reyes, Cramer, and Hoekstra. mark. ceedings on the amendment offered by From the Committee on Science and Tech- Concurrent Technology has been the the gentleman from Arizona will be nology, for consideration of secs. 703, 1301, recipient of millions upon millions of 1464, 1467, and 1507 of the Senate amendment, postponed. and modifications committed to conference: dollars over the years. The executives Mr. VISCLOSKY. Mr. Chairman, I Messrs. Gordon of Tennessee, Wu, and in Concurrent Technology contribute move that the Committee do now rise. Gingrey. handsomely to Members of Congress. The motion was agreed to. From the Committee on Transportation So it receives a lot of earmarks. It Accordingly, the Committee rose; and Infrastructure, for consideration of Ti- seems to be an earmark incubator of and the Speaker pro tempore (Mr. tles I–III, sec. 1002, and Title XI of the House some type, an earmark that begets DAVIS of Illinois) having assumed the bill, and secs. 202, 301, Title IV, secs. 801–803, 807, 901, 1001, 1002, 1101–1103, 1422–1424, 1426, more earmarks. chair, Mr. TIERNEY, Chairman of the And yet we have the report that 1427, 1429, 1430, 1433, 1436–1438, 1441, 1443, 1444, Committee of the Whole House on the 1446, 1449, 1464, 1473, 1503, and 1605 of the Sen- comes with the bill that doesn’t even state of the Union, reported that that mention Concurrent Technology.
  • Regional Economic Development Council Plans

    Regional Economic Development Council Plans

    Governor Andrew M. Cuomo Regional EconomicAwards Development Council 2017 1 Table of Contents Regional Council Awards Western New York .........................................................................................................................10 Finger Lakes ...................................................................................................................................24 Southern Tier ..................................................................................................................................36 Central New York ..........................................................................................................................48 Mohawk Valley ...............................................................................................................................62 North Country .................................................................................................................................74 Capital Region ................................................................................................................................85 Mid-Hudson .....................................................................................................................................98 New York City ................................................................................................................................ 114 Long Island ...................................................................................................................................
  • Final Independent External Peer Review Report

    Final Independent External Peer Review Report

    Final Independent External Peer Review Report Mamaroneck and Sheldrake River Basin, Village of Mamaroneck Westchester County, NY Flood Risk Management General Reevaluation Report Prepared by Battelle Memorial Institute Prepared for Department of the Army U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Flood Risk Management Planning Center of Expertise Baltimore District Contract No. W912HQ-10-D-0002 Task Order: 0088 August 6, 2015 BATTELLE | August 6, 2015 i Mamaroneck-Sheldrake IEPR | Final IEPR Report This page is intentionally left blank. BATTELLE | August 6, 2015 Mamaroneck-Sheldrake IEPR | Final IEPR Report CONTRACT NO. W912HQ-10-D-0002 Task Order: 0088 Final Independent External Peer Review Report Mamaroneck and Sheldrake River Basin, Village of Mamaroneck Westchester County, NY Flood Risk Management General Reevaluation Report Prepared by Battelle 505 King Avenue Columbus, Ohio 43201 for Department of the Army U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Flood Risk Management Planning Center of Expertise Baltimore District August 6, 2015 BATTELLE | August 6, 2015 i Mamaroneck-Sheldrake IEPR | Final IEPR Report This page is intentionally left blank. BATTELLE | August 6, 2015 ii Mamaroneck-Sheldrake IEPR | Final IEPR Report Final Independent External Peer Review Report Mamaroneck and Sheldrake River Basin, Village of Mamaroneck Westchester County, NY Flood Risk Management General Reevaluation Report Executive Summary Project Background and Purpose The Mamaroneck and Sheldrake Rivers Basin has a 23-square-mile drainage area and is located along the northern coast of Long Island Sound within the New York City metropolitan area. The Mamaroneck and Sheldrake Rivers Basin lies entirely within Westchester County, New York and contains portions of the Village and Town of Mamaroneck, the Cities of New Rochelle and White Plains, the Towns of Harrison and North Castle, and the Village of Scarsdale.
  • Statistics of the Presidential and Congressional Election of Nov.7

    Statistics of the Presidential and Congressional Election of Nov.7

    STATISTICS OF THE PRESIDENTIAL AND CONGRESSIONAL ELECTION OF NOVEMBER 7, 2000 SHOWING THE HIGHEST VOTE FOR PRESIDENTIAL ELECTORS, AND THE VOTE CAST FOR EACH NOMINEE FOR UNITED STATES SENATOR, REPRESENTATIVE, RESIDENT COMMIS- SIONER, AND DELEGATE TO THE ONE HUNDRED SEVENTH CONGRESS, TOGETHER WITH A RECAPITULATION THEREOF, INCLUDING THE ELECTORAL VOTE COMPILED FROM OFFICIAL SOURCES BY JEFF TRANDAHL CLERK OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES (Corrected to June 21, 2001) WASHINGTON : 2001 VerDate 23-MAR-99 13:50 Jul 10, 2001 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 0217 Sfmt 0217 C:\DBASE\STATS107.TXT PUB1 PsN: PUB1 STATISTICS OF THE PRESIDENTIAL AND CONGRESSIONAL ELECTION OF NOVEMBER 7, 2000 (Number which precedes name of candidate designates congressional district. Since party names for Presidential Electors for the same candidate vary from state to state, the most commonly used name is listed in parentheses.) ALABAMA FOR PRESIDENTIAL ELECTORS Republican .................................................................................................. 941,173 Democratic .................................................................................................. 692,611 Independent ................................................................................................ 1 25,896 Libertarian ................................................................................................. 5,893 Write-in ....................................................................................................... 699 FOR UNITED STATES REPRESENTATIVE
  • Animal Science Alumni Newsletter, Summer 2005

    Animal Science Alumni Newsletter, Summer 2005

    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Animal Science Department News Animal Science Department July 2005 Animal Science Alumni Newsletter, Summer 2005 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/animalscinews Part of the Animal Sciences Commons "Animal Science Alumni Newsletter, Summer 2005" (2005). Animal Science Department News. 10. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/animalscinews/10 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Animal Science Department at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Animal Science Department News by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Animal Science Animal Science Department ALUMNI NEWSLETTER P.O. Box 830908 • Lincoln, NE 68583-0908 Phone (402) 472-3571 • Web: animalscience.unl.edu Summer 2005 University of Nebraska–Lincoln Beef Teaching Herds have Interesting History The Foundation Years quite a stir and much favorable publicity for the University of Nebraska and the Department of Animal Husbandry. He was The first mention of beef cattle used for instruction of stu- mounted for exhibition at the 1904 Louisiana Purchase Exposi- dents at the University of Nebraska was about 1874 according tion (World’s Fair) in St. Louis and was subsequently returned to Professor Wm. J. Loeffel’s written history of “Animal Hus- to Lincoln where he was used as a classroom model in Animal bandry Through the Years at the University of Nebraska.” While Husbandry until destroyed by fire in 1931. the University was founded in 1869, and the College of Agricul- ture was established in 1872, it wasn’t until 1874 that the “col- The Purebred Teaching Herds Develop lege farm” was purchased at the current location of the UNL East Campus for $55 per acre.
  • Moyer Creek Basin Assessment

    Moyer Creek Basin Assessment

    EMERGENCY TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE RECOVERY WATER BASIN ASSESSMENT AND FLOOD HAZARD MITIGATION ALTERNATIVES MOYER CREEK HERKIMER COUNTY, NEW YORK April 2014 MMI #5231-01 Photo Source: Milone & MacBroom, Inc. (2013) This document was prepared for the New York State Department of Transportation, in cooperation with the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Prepared by: MILONE & MACBROOM, INC. 134 Main Street, Suite A1 New Paltz, NY 12561 (845) 633-8153 www.miloneandmacbroom.com Copyright 2014 Milone & MacBroom, Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Project Background ...................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Nomenclature ............................................................................................................... 3 2.0 DATA COLLECTION .......................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Initial Data Collection .................................................................................................. 3 2.2 Public Outreach ............................................................................................................ 3 2.3 Field Assessment .......................................................................................................... 3 2.4 Watershed Land Use ...................................................................................................