DOCSLIB.ORG

NY State Bridge Data

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NY State Bridge Data NY State Highway Bridge Data: October 31, 2011 Herkimer County Year Date NYS Built or of Last SD/FO Condition Region County Municipality Location Feature Carried Feature Crossed Owner Replaced Inspection Status Rating 02 Herkimer Cold Brook (Village) 1.1 MI N JCT SH 8 & SH 28 8 8 23081019 COLD BROOK NYSDoT 1998 07/13/2010 N 6.21 02 Herkimer Cold Brook (Village) 1.9 MI N JCT RTS 28 & 8 8 8 23081026 COLD BROOK NYSDoT 1998 07/13/2010 N 6.50 02 Herkimer Columbia (Town) 2.9 MI SE OF CEDARVILLE CASLER ROAD UNADILLA LAKE OUT Town 1920 10/11/2010 FO 6.54 02 Herkimer Columbia (Town) 1 MILE SE OF CEDARVILLE COUNTY ROAD 85 UNADILLA RIVER County 1969 05/18/2011 SD 4.29 02 Herkimer Danube (Town) 2.3 MI SE JCT RTS 5S &169 5S 5S23021236 NOWADAGA CREEK NYSDoT 1931 09/01/2010 SD 5.06 02 Herkimer Danube (Town) 05MI E INT 29A RTE 90I 90I X 5S 5S23021217 NYS Thruway Authority 1954 08/04/2010 N 5.06 02 Herkimer Danube (Town) 05MI E INT 29A RTE 90I 90I X 5S 5S23021217 NYS Thruway Authority 1954 08/04/2010 N 5.13 02 Herkimer Danube (Town) 3.5 MI SE OF LITTLE FALLS 90I X EASTBOUND DEPOT RD NYS Thruway Authority 1954 05/06/2010 FO 4.44 02 Herkimer Danube (Town) RTE 90I AT INT 29A 90I X EASTBOUND EXIT 29A RAMP NYS Thruway Authority 1970 05/11/2010 N 4.83 02 Herkimer Danube (Town) 3.5 MI SE OF LITTLE FALLS 90I X WESTBOUND DEPOT RD NYS Thruway Authority 1954 05/06/2010 FO 4.47 02 Herkimer Danube (Town) RTE 90-I AT INT 29A 90I X WESTBOUND EXIT 29A RAMP NYS Thruway Authority 1970 05/11/2010 N 4.64 02 Herkimer Danube (Town) 4.5 MI SE OF LITTLE FALLS COUNTY ROAD 102 NOWADAGA CREEK County 2007 10/29/2009 N 6.86 02 Herkimer Danube (Town) 4.5 MI SE OF LITTLE FALLS COUNTY ROAD 102 NOWADAGA CREEK County 2008 11/10/2010 N 7.00 02 Herkimer Danube (Town) 4.5 MI SE OF LITTLE FALLS COUNTY ROAD 102 NOWADAGA CREEK County 1934 06/28/2011 SD 4.29 02 Herkimer Danube (Town) 2.8 MI NE OF PAINES HLLOW COUNTY ROAD 136 UNKNOWN CREEK County 1991 06/15/2011 N 5.90 02 Herkimer Danube (Town) 3.0 MI SW ST. JOHNSVILLE CR 188 RIVER RD 90I X NYS Thruway Authority 1954 10/13/2009 FO 4.85 02 Herkimer Danube (Town) 4.9 MI S OF LITTLE FALLS JOHNNY CAKE ROAD UNKNOWN CREEK County 2009 06/28/2011 N 6.59 02 Herkimer Danube (Town) 5 MI S OF LITTLE FALLS NEWVILLE ROAD NOWADAGA CREEK County 2001 08/02/2011 N 6.44 02 Herkimer Danube (Town) .3 MI N JCT SH29A & SH 5S RAMP 90I TO RT 16 5S 5S23021212 NYS Thruway Authority 1974 05/10/2011 N 4.75 02 Herkimer Danube (Town) 12MI SE JCT RTS 5+169 SERVICE ROAD ERIE BARGE CANAL NYSDoT 1913 08/16/2011 SD 4.18 02 Herkimer Danube (Town) 5 MI S CITY LITTLE FALLS TIBBITTS ROAD NOWADAGA CREEK Town 1955 04/13/2011 N 4.69 02 Herkimer Fairfield (Town) 16MI S JCT RTS 29+169 169 169 23012067 STONY CREEK NYSDoT 1925 05/20/2010 SD 4.09 02 Herkimer Fairfield (Town) .5 MI NE OF KAST BRIDGE COUNTY ROAD 7 NORTH CREEK County 2008 11/23/2010 N 7.00 02 Herkimer Fairfield (Town) 1.5 MI N OF MIDDLEVILLE FARRINGTON ROAD CITY BROOK Town 1900 08/01/2011 FO 4.80 02 Herkimer Frankfort (Town) 4.8 MI SW JCT RT 5S & 171 171 171 23011000 MOYER CREEK NYSDoT 1974 11/01/2010 N 5.00 02 Herkimer Frankfort (Town) 3.7 MI SW JCT RT 5S & 171 171 171 23011013 MOYER CREEK NYSDoT 1993 05/16/2011 N 6.31 02 Herkimer Frankfort (Town) 3.5 MI SW JCT RT 5S & 171 171 171 23011014 MOYER CREEK NYSDoT 1988 04/30/2010 N 7.00 02 Herkimer Frankfort (Town) 2.9 MI SW JCT RT 5S & 171 171 171 23011019 MOYER CREEK NYSDoT 1993 05/31/2011 N 6.25 02 Herkimer Frankfort (Town) 2.1 MI SW JCT RT 5S & 171 171 171 23011028 MOYER CREEK NYSDoT 1993 07/07/2009 N 6.95 02 Herkimer Frankfort (Town) 1.4 MI SW JCT SH 5S & SH1 171 171 23011035 MOYER CREEK NYSDoT 1992 09/21/2010 N 5.69 02 Herkimer Frankfort (Town) 1.2 MI SW JCT RT 5S & 171 171 171 23011037 MOYER CREEK NYSDoT 1992 09/21/2010 N 6.29 02 Herkimer Frankfort (Town) .3 MI W JCT SH 5S & SH 17 171 171 23011045 MOYER CREEK NYSDoT 1968 10/08/2010 N 6.46 02 Herkimer Frankfort (Town) JCT RTS 5S + 171 171 171 23011049 5S 5S23021071 NYSDoT 1966 05/20/2010 FO 5.94 02 Herkimer Frankfort (Town) IN WEST FRANKFORT 5S 5S23021011 FERGUSON CREEK NYSDoT 1966 03/25/2010 FO 5.37 02 Herkimer Frankfort (Town) 10.4 MI E JCT SH5S & SH12 5S 5S23021069 MOYER CREEK NYSDoT 1968 05/20/2010 FO 5.89 02 Herkimer Frankfort (Town) 10.4 MI E JCT SH5S & SH12 5S 5S23021070 MOYER CREEK NYSDoT 1968 05/04/2010 FO 5.86 02 Herkimer Frankfort (Town) IN FRANKFORT 5S 5S23021076 CR 81- REESE ROAD NYSDoT 1968 05/07/2010 FO 5.41 02 Herkimer Frankfort (Town) IN FRANKFORT 5S 5S23021076 CR 81- REESE ROAD NYSDoT 1968 09/21/2010 FO 5.16 02 Herkimer Frankfort (Town) 10MI W JCT RTS 51+5S 5S 5S23021085 MCGOWAN CRK NYSDoT 1966 07/15/2010 N 6.00 02 Herkimer Frankfort (Town) 2.8 MI W JCT SH 5S & SH28 5S 5S23021385 W MAIN ST/ ACME R NYSDoT 1988 05/20/2011 FO 6.25 Page 1 NY State Highway Bridge Data: October 31, 2011 Herkimer County Year Date NYS Built or of Last SD/FO Condition Region County Municipality Location Feature Carried Feature Crossed Owner Replaced Inspection Status Rating 02 Herkimer Frankfort (Town) 0.6MI W INSECT RTS 5S &51 5S 5S23021390 STEELE CREEK NYSDoT 1988 04/24/2009 N 6.57 02 Herkimer Frankfort (Town) 1.2 MI SW OF W SCHUYLER BLEEKER ST EXTEN FERGUSON CREEK County 1965 05/19/2011 N 5.00 02 Herkimer Frankfort (Town) 1.0 MI SW VLLGE FRANKFORT BRICE ROAD MOYER CREEK Town 1930 05/10/2011 SD 4.49 02 Herkimer Frankfort (Town) 2 MI SE OF WEST FRANKFORT COUNTY ROAD 13 FERGUSON CREEK County 1981 05/10/2011 N 5.48 02 Herkimer Frankfort (Town) 3.8 MILES NW OF FRANKFORT COUNTY ROAD 13 FERGUSON CREEK County 1934 08/02/2011 FO 5.71 02 Herkimer Frankfort (Town) 4.5 MI E JCT SH 12 & SH5S COUNTY ROAD 37 CSX TRANS/AMTRAK County 1981 10/20/2009 N 5.80 02 Herkimer Frankfort (Town) 1 MI SW OF WEST SCHUYLER COUNTY ROAD 37 FERGUSON CREEK County 1965 05/19/2011 N 5.21 02 Herkimer Frankfort (Town) .7 MI SW JCT CR 37 & I90 COUNTY ROAD 37 MOHAWK RIVER County 1981 06/28/2011 N 5.85 02 Herkimer Frankfort (Town) IN WEST FRANKFORT COUNTY ROAD 37 OLD STATE HWY 5S County 1981 06/28/2011 N 6.02 02 Herkimer Frankfort (Town) 4.5 MI E JCT RTS 5S & 12 DYKE ROAD 5S 5S23021010 NYSDoT 1968 07/12/2011 FO 5.52 02 Herkimer Frankfort (Town) 9.7 MI E JCT RTS 5S & 12 HIGBY ROAD 5S 5S23021062 NYSDoT 1968 08/26/2011 FO 5.44 02 Herkimer Frankfort (Town) 8.7 MI E JCT RTS 5S & 12 MUCKY RUN ROAD 5S 5S23021052 NYSDoT 1968 08/29/2011 FO 6.16 02 Herkimer Frankfort (Town) IN WEST FRANKFORT OLD STATE RTE 5S FERGUSON CREEK Town 1948 05/10/2011 N 4.89 02 Herkimer Frankfort (Town) 0.1 MI NE OF FRANKFORT RAILROAD STREET CSX TRANS/AMTRAK Town 1981 06/24/2010 N 5.52 02 Herkimer Frankfort (Village) AT VILLAGE OF FRANKFORT HILLTOP ROAD MOYER CREEK Village 1932 04/27/2010 N 4.80 02 Herkimer Frankfort (Village) AT VILLAGE OF FRANKFORT WEST MAIN STREET MOYER CREEK Village 1933 06/16/2011 SD 4.69 02 Herkimer German Flatts (Town) 4.7M SE JCT RTS 28&168 168 168 2301051 FULMER CREEK NYSDoT 1987 04/12/2011 N 6.24 02 Herkimer German Flatts (Town) 1.4M SE JCT RTS 28 & 168 168 168 23011015 FULMER CREEK NYSDoT 1987 04/14/2011 N 6.39 02 Herkimer German Flatts (Town) 1.8 MI SE JCT SH28 &SH168 168 168 23011019 FULMER CREEK NYSDoT 1987 04/26/2011 N 6.40 02 Herkimer German Flatts (Town) 1.9 MI SE JCT SH28 &SH168 168 168 23011020 FULMER CREEK NYSDoT 1987 05/31/2011 N 6.18 02 Herkimer German Flatts (Town) 2.7MI SE JCT RTS 28 & 168 168 168 23011028 FLATT CREEK NYSDoT 1987 04/15/2011 N 6.14 02 Herkimer German Flatts (Town) 2.9M SE JCT RTS 28&168 168 168 23011030 FULMER CREEK NYSDoT 1987 06/23/2011 N 5.70 02 Herkimer German Flatts (Town) 3.2MI SE JCT RTS 28 & 168 168 168 23011034 FULMER CREEK NYSDoT 1987 04/14/2011 N 6.61 02 Herkimer German Flatts (Town) 3.4 MI SE JCT RTS 28&168 168 168 23011035 FULMER CREEK NYSDoT 1987 04/26/2011 N 6.54 02 Herkimer German Flatts (Town) 3.6 MI W JCT RTS 167 & 5S 5S 5S23021144 90I X NYSDoT 1995 04/19/2010 N 5.86 02 Herkimer German Flatts (Town) 2.5 M W JCT RTS 176 & 5S 5S 5S23021156 90I X NYS Thruway Authority 1995 04/19/2010 FO 5.85 02 Herkimer German Flatts (Town) .2 MI E OF EXIT 30 - I90 922B 922B23011001 ERIE BARGE CANAL NYSDoT 1967 04/24/2009 N 5.34 02 Herkimer German Flatts (Town) 1.5 MI E OF PAINES HOLLOW COUNTY ROAD 68 FULMER CREEK County 1935 08/05/2010 N 5.59 02 Herkimer German Flatts (Town) AT VILLAGE OF ILION SECOND STREET STEELE CREEK Town 1890 07/19/2011 FO 4.26 02 Herkimer German Flatts (Town) 1 MILE SOUTH OF ILION SPINNERVILLE ROAD STEELE CREEK County 2003 04/12/2011 N 6.83 02 Herkimer German Flatts (Town) VILLAGE OF ILION THIRD STREET STEELE CREEK Town 2007 10/29/2009 N 7.00 02 Herkimer Herkimer (Town) .4 MI S OF SCHRADER HL RD 28 28 23041185 UNNAMED CREEK NYSDoT 1931 06/23/2009 N 5.09 02 Herkimer Herkimer (Town) JCT RTS 5+51 N OF ILION 51 51 23031168 5 5 23111093 NYSDoT 1968 12/06/2010 N 4.69 02 Herkimer Herkimer (Town) 1MI EAST OF HERKIMER 90I X 5 5 23111103 NYS Thruway Authority 1994 06/10/2011 FO 5.86 02 Herkimer Herkimer (Town) 1 MILE NE OF KAST BRIDGE FIDDLETOWN ROAD NORTH CREEK Town 1970 04/27/2011 FO 4.81 02 Herkimer Herkimer (Town) .75 MI N JCT SH 5 & SH 28 SHELLS BUSH ROAD WEST CANADA CREEK Town 1989 08/03/2011 N 5.62 02 Herkimer Herkimer (Town) 0.1 MILE EAST OF NYS RT28 WEST END ROAD WEST CANADA CREEK County 1999 05/27/2010 N 6.54 02 Herkimer Herkimer (Village) 15 MI N JCT RTS 5 & 28 28 28 23041140 HYDRAULIC CANAL NYSDoT 1964 06/30/2009 N 5.00 02 Herkimer Herkimer (Village) 1.7 MI E JCT RTS 5 & 51 5 5 23111108 CSX TRANSPRTATION NYSDoT 1949 09/14/2010 N 5.30 02 Herkimer Herkimer (Village) .1 MI W JCT SH 5 & SH 28 5 5 23111118 HYDRAULIC CANAL NYSDoT 1949 05/04/2010 N 5.27 Page 2 NY State Highway Bridge Data: October 31, 2011 Herkimer
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fulmer Creek Basin Assessment
    EMERGENCY TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE RECOVERY WATER BASIN ASSESSMENT AND FLOOD HAZARD MITIGATION ALTERNATIVES FULMER CREEK HERKIMER COUNTY, NEW YORK April 2014 MMI #5231-01 Photo Source: Milone and MacBroom, Inc. (2013) This document was prepared for the New York State Department of Transportation, In cooperation with the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Prepared by: MILONE & MACBROOM, INC. 134 Main Street, Suite A1 New Paltz, NY 12561 (845) 633-8153 www.miloneandmacbroom.com Copyright 2014 Milone & MacBroom, Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Project Background ...................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Nomenclature ............................................................................................................... 3 2.0 DATA COLLECTION .......................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Initial Data Collection .................................................................................................. 3 2.2 Public Outreach ............................................................................................................ 3 2.3 Field Assessment .......................................................................................................... 3 2.4 Watershed Land Use ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mohawk River Watershed – HUC-12
    ID Number Name of Mohawk Watershed 1 Switz Kill 2 Flat Creek 3 Headwaters West Creek 4 Kayaderosseras Creek 5 Little Schoharie Creek 6 Headwaters Mohawk River 7 Headwaters Cayadutta Creek 8 Lansing Kill 9 North Creek 10 Little West Kill 11 Irish Creek 12 Auries Creek 13 Panther Creek 14 Hinckley Reservoir 15 Nowadaga Creek 16 Wheelers Creek 17 Middle Canajoharie Creek 18 Honnedaga 19 Roberts Creek 20 Headwaters Otsquago Creek 21 Mill Creek 22 Lewis Creek 23 Upper East Canada Creek 24 Shakers Creek 25 King Creek 26 Crane Creek 27 South Chuctanunda Creek 28 Middle Sprite Creek 29 Crum Creek 30 Upper Canajoharie Creek 31 Manor Kill 32 Vly Brook 33 West Kill 34 Headwaters Batavia Kill 35 Headwaters Flat Creek 36 Sterling Creek 37 Lower Ninemile Creek 38 Moyer Creek 39 Sixmile Creek 40 Cincinnati Creek 41 Reall Creek 42 Fourmile Brook 43 Poentic Kill 44 Wilsey Creek 45 Lower East Canada Creek 46 Middle Ninemile Creek 47 Gooseberry Creek 48 Mother Creek 49 Mud Creek 50 North Chuctanunda Creek 51 Wharton Hollow Creek 52 Wells Creek 53 Sandsea Kill 54 Middle East Canada Creek 55 Beaver Brook 56 Ferguson Creek 57 West Creek 58 Fort Plain 59 Ox Kill 60 Huntersfield Creek 61 Platter Kill 62 Headwaters Oriskany Creek 63 West Kill 64 Headwaters South Branch West Canada Creek 65 Fly Creek 66 Headwaters Alplaus Kill 67 Punch Kill 68 Schenevus Creek 69 Deans Creek 70 Evas Kill 71 Cripplebush Creek 72 Zimmerman Creek 73 Big Brook 74 North Creek 75 Upper Ninemile Creek 76 Yatesville Creek 77 Concklin Brook 78 Peck Lake-Caroga Creek 79 Metcalf Brook 80 Indian
    [Show full text]
  • Progress of Stream Measurements
    Water-Supply and Irrigation Paper No. 125 Series P, Hydrographic Progress Reports, 30 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES D. WALCOTT, DIRECTOR REPORT PROGRESS OF STREAM MEASUREMENTS THE CALENDAR YEAR 1904 PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF F. H. NEWELL BY R. E. HORTON, N. C. GROVER, and JOHN C. HOYT PART II. Hudson, Passaic, Raritan, and Delaware River Drainages WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1905 Water-Supply and Irrigation Paper No. 125 Series P, Hydrographic Progress Reports, 30 i DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES D. WALCOTT, DIRECTOR REPORT PROGRESS OF STREAM MEASUREMENTS THE CALENDAR YEAR 1904 PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF F. H. NEWELL BY R. E. HORTON, N. C. GROVER, and JOHN C. HOYT PART II. Hudson, Passaic, Raritan, and Delaware River Drainages WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1905 CONTENTS. Letter of transmittal...................................................... 7 Introduction............................................................. 9 Cooperation and acknowledgments ...... ...^.............................. 18 Hudson Eiver drainage basin. ............................................ 19 Hudson Eiver at Fort Edward, N. Y .............................. 19 Hudson Eiver at Mechanicsville, N. Y............................. 22 Indian Eiver at Indian Lake, Hamilton County, N. Y.............. 24 Hoosic Eiver at Buskirk, N. Y .................................... 24 Mohawk River at Little Falls, N. Y................................ 26 Mohawk Eiver at Dunsbach Ferry Bridge, N. Y.................... 29 Oriskany Creek near Oriskany, N. Y .............................. 32 Starch Factory Creek near New Hartford, N. Y.................... 35 Sylvan Glen Creek near New Hartford, N. Y....................... 37 Graefenberg Creek near New Hartford, N. Y....................... 39 Eeels Creek and Johnston Brook near Deer-field, N. Y.............. 41 Nail Creek at Utica, N. Y......................................... 45 West Canada Creek at Twin Eock Bridge, N. Y...................
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Public Comment on Draft Trout Stream Management Plan
    Assessment of public comments on draft New York State Trout Stream Management Plan OCTOBER 27, 2020 Andrew M. Cuomo, Governor | Basil Seggos, Commissioner A draft of the Fisheries Management Plan for Inland Trout Streams in New York State (Plan) was released for public review on May 26, 2020 with the comment period extending through June 25, 2020. Public comment was solicited through a variety of avenues including: • a posting of the statewide public comment period in the Environmental Notice Bulletin (ENB), • a DEC news release distributed statewide, • an announcement distributed to all e-mail addresses provided by participants at the 2017 and 2019 public meetings on trout stream management described on page 11 of the Plan [353 recipients, 181 unique opens (58%)], and • an announcement distributed to all subscribers to the DEC Delivers Freshwater Fishing and Boating Group [138,122 recipients, 34,944 unique opens (26%)]. A total of 489 public comments were received through e-mail or letters (Appendix A, numbered 1-277 and 300-511). 471 of these comments conveyed specific concerns, recommendations or endorsements; the other 18 comments were general statements or pertained to issues outside the scope of the plan. General themes to recurring comments were identified (22 total themes), and responses to these are included below. These themes only embrace recommendations or comments of concern. Comments that represent favorable and supportive views are not included in this assessment. Duplicate comment source numbers associated with a numbered theme reflect comments on subtopics within the general theme. Theme #1 The statewide catch and release (artificial lures only) season proposed to run from October 16 through March 31 poses a risk to the sustainability of wild trout populations and the quality of the fisheries they support that is either wholly unacceptable or of great concern, particularly in some areas of the state; notably Delaware/Catskill waters.
    [Show full text]
  • Waterbody Classifications, Streams Based on Waterbody Classifications
    Waterbody Classifications, Streams Based on Waterbody Classifications Waterbody Type Segment ID Waterbody Index Number (WIN) Streams 0202-0047 Pa-63-30 Streams 0202-0048 Pa-63-33 Streams 0801-0419 Ont 19- 94- 1-P922- Streams 0201-0034 Pa-53-21 Streams 0801-0422 Ont 19- 98 Streams 0801-0423 Ont 19- 99 Streams 0801-0424 Ont 19-103 Streams 0801-0429 Ont 19-104- 3 Streams 0801-0442 Ont 19-105 thru 112 Streams 0801-0445 Ont 19-114 Streams 0801-0447 Ont 19-119 Streams 0801-0452 Ont 19-P1007- Streams 1001-0017 C- 86 Streams 1001-0018 C- 5 thru 13 Streams 1001-0019 C- 14 Streams 1001-0022 C- 57 thru 95 (selected) Streams 1001-0023 C- 73 Streams 1001-0024 C- 80 Streams 1001-0025 C- 86-3 Streams 1001-0026 C- 86-5 Page 1 of 464 09/28/2021 Waterbody Classifications, Streams Based on Waterbody Classifications Name Description Clear Creek and tribs entire stream and tribs Mud Creek and tribs entire stream and tribs Tribs to Long Lake total length of all tribs to lake Little Valley Creek, Upper, and tribs stream and tribs, above Elkdale Kents Creek and tribs entire stream and tribs Crystal Creek, Upper, and tribs stream and tribs, above Forestport Alder Creek and tribs entire stream and tribs Bear Creek and tribs entire stream and tribs Minor Tribs to Kayuta Lake total length of select tribs to the lake Little Black Creek, Upper, and tribs stream and tribs, above Wheelertown Twin Lakes Stream and tribs entire stream and tribs Tribs to North Lake total length of all tribs to lake Mill Brook and minor tribs entire stream and selected tribs Riley Brook
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of Ddt, Chlordane, and Total Pcb's in Bed Sediments in the Hudson River Basin
    NYES&E, Vol. 3, No. 1, Spring 1997 DISTRIBUTION OF DDT, CHLORDANE, AND TOTAL PCB'S IN BED SEDIMENTS IN THE HUDSON RIVER BASIN Patrick J. Phillips1, Karen Riva-Murray1, Hannah M. Hollister2, and Elizabeth A. Flanary1. 1U.S. Geological Survey, 425 Jordan Road, Troy NY 12180. 2Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Troy NY 12180. Abstract Data from streambed-sediment samples collected from 45 sites in the Hudson River Basin and analyzed for organochlorine compounds indicate that residues of DDT, chlordane, and PCB's can be detected even though use of these compounds has been banned for 10 or more years. Previous studies indicate that DDT and chlordane were widely used in a variety of land use settings in the basin, whereas PCB's were introduced into Hudson and Mohawk Rivers mostly as point discharges at a few locations. Detection limits for DDT and chlordane residues in this study were generally 1 µg/kg, and that for total PCB's was 50 µg/kg. Some form of DDT was detected in more than 60 percent of the samples, and some form of chlordane was found in about 30 percent; PCB's were found in about 33 percent of the samples. Median concentrations for p,p’- DDE (the DDT residue with the highest concentration) were highest in samples from sites representing urban areas (median concentration 5.3 µg/kg) and lower in samples from sites in large watersheds (1.25 µg/kg) and at sites in nonurban watersheds. (Urban watershed were defined as those with a population density of more than 60/km2; nonurban watersheds as those with a population density of less than 60/km2, and large watersheds as those encompassing more than 1,300 km2.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Library of Rochester and Monroe County · Historic Monographs Collection
    Central Library of Rochester and Monroe County · Historic Monographs Collection Central Library of Rochester and Monroe County · Historic Monographs Collection A FOB THE TOURIST J1ND TRAVELLER, ALONO THE LINE OF THE CANALS, AND TUB INTERIOli COMMERCE OF THE STATE OF NEW-YORK. BT HORATIO GATES SPAFFORD, LL. IX AUTHOR OF THE GAZETTEER Of SKW-IOBK. JfEW-YOBK: PRIXTEB BY T. AND J. SWORDS, No. 99 Pearl-street. 1824. Prfee SO Ceats. Central Library of Rochester and Monroe County · Historic Monographs Collection Northern-District of New-York, In wit: BE it remembered, thut on the twelfth day of July, in the forty-ninth year of the Inde­ pendence of the United States of America, A. D 1824. Harutio G. Spajford, of the said District, hath deposited in this Office the title of a Book, the right whereof he claims as Author, in the word& following, to wit: **A Pocket Guide for the Tourist and Traveller, along the line of the Canals, and the interior Commerce of the State of New-York. By Horatio Gates Spaffor'dyLL.D. Author of the Gazetteer of Nete-York." In conformity to the Act of the Congress of the United States, entitled, " An Act for the Encouragement of Learn­ ing, !>y securing the Copies of Maps, Charts, and Books, to the Authors and Proprietors of such Copies, during the times therein mentioned;" and also to the Act, entitled " An Act, supplementary to an Act, entitled ' An Act for the Encou­ ragement of Learning, !>y securing the Copies of Maps, Charts, and Hooks, to the Authors and Proprietors of such Copies during the times therein mentioned,' and extending the Benefits thereof to the Arts of Designing, Engraving, and Etching Historical and other Prints." R.
    [Show full text]
  • Herkimer Flood Damage Reduction Project
    HERKIMER FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION PROJECT Department of Environmental Conservation Operated and Maintained by: The Village of Herkimer Region 6 Counties: Herkimer, Jefferson, Lewis, Oneida, St. Lawrence PROJECT LOCATION The project area is located on the Mohawk River in the Village of Herkimer, Herkimer County, in East Central New York State. The improvement works extend along the left bank of Bellinger Brook, the left bank of the Mohawk River and along the right bank of West Canada Creek. Page 1 of 6 Herkimer Flood Damage Reduction Project PROJECT DESCRIPTION The protective works extend approximately 12,800 feet with 2,900 feet along the left bank of Bellinger Brook, 6,900 feet along the Mohawk River (including the New York State Thruway and Thruway Access Road) and 3,000 feet along the right bank of West Canada Creek. The improvements consist as follows: Clearing and snagging of Bellinger Brook along the channel bottom and left bank from station (3 – 56) to the inlet of the culvert under New York Route 5. The construction of earth levees along Bellinger Brook, the Thruway Access Road, Mohawk River, and West Canada Creek. A blanket levee along the east slope of the existing railroad embankment running parallel to West Canada Creek. Gravel blankets on the New York State Thruway embankments. Closure structures across the New York Central Railroad spur line near the Bellinger Brook crossing, and across Mohawk Street at its intersection with the New York State Thruway Control gates along the hydraulic canal. Two pump stations, ponding areas, access roads, culverts, ditches, catch basins, and appurtenant drainage works.
    [Show full text]
  • Round 24 Agricultural Nonpoint Source Abatement and Control Program Project Descriptions All Projects Support the New York State
    Round 24 Agricultural Nonpoint Source Abatement gricultural A and Control Program Project Descriptions Environmental All projects support the New York State Agricultural Management Environmental Management (AEM) Program by funding the implementation of agricultural water quality Best Management Practices (BMPs) to protect natural resources while maintaining the economic viability of New York State’s diverse agricultural community. Western NY $122,100 was awarded to the Allegany County Soil and Water Conservation District to work with two farms in the Wiscoy Creek Watershed. The project will: • Reduce nutrient and sediment loading within the watershed • Improve manure management on two farm facilities • Control livestock access to the stream with exclusionary fence and access control $572,204 was awarded to the Cattaraugus County Soil and Water Conservation District to work with one farm in the Cattaraugus Creek Watershed. The project will: • Reduce agricultural runoff and improve manure management • Implement a riparian buffer for additional water quality protection $779,900 was awarded to the Cattaraugus County Soil and Water Conservation District to work with three farms in the Conewango Creek Watershed. The project will: • Significantly help reduce the impact of runoff • Improve agricultural waste management • Establish riparian buffers in sensitive areas to help reduce sediment and phosphorus runoff. $156,255 was awarded to the Chautauqua County Soil and Water Conservation District to work with one farm in the Clymer Water District which includes Hulbert/Clymer Pond. The project will: • Reduce phosphorus and nitrogen inputs to the Clymer Aquifer and surface water resources • Improve agricultural waste management • Implement a riparian herbaceous buffer to filter nutrients and sediment from livestock pasture $809,370 was awarded to the Chautauqua County Soil and Water Conservation District to work with two farms in the Conewango Creek Watershed.
    [Show full text]
  • Resilient NY Program
    1 Resilient NY Program October 29, 2019 Thomas R. Snow Jr. New York City Watershed and Flood Resiliency Programs 2 Resilient NY Program Flood/Ice Jam studies - • Includes 48 high-priority watersheds across NYS § Comprehensive hydrologic and hydraulic analysis (HEC-RAS) and ice jams (where applicable); § Fluvial geomorphic assessment; § Current and future flood flows due to climate change will be evaluated; and § Reports will include specific project recommendations to mitigate flooding and ice jams. 3 4 Hudson River Watershed - Wappinger Creek – Dutchess County Roeliff Jansen Kill – Dutchess/Columbia Main Street Brook – Ulster County Catskill Creek – Greene County Stockport Creek – Columbia/Rensselaer 5 How where these watersheds chosen? • # of Repetitive Losses/community (FEMA information). • # Repetitive Losses/stream (FEMA/DEC information); • Total $ flood insurance payment (FEMA information); • DEC technical staff; • Consultation with Departments of Homeland Security and EmerGency Services and State; and • County Soil and Water Conservation District staff. 6 Flooding - • An unfortunate reality in and near riverine areas across NYS • Most recent catastrophic floods 2006, 2011, 2012 and 2013 • Isolated storms § July 2017 – Town of Whitestown/Village of Whitesboro, Hoosick Falls • Ice jam flooding is also a common occurrence 7 Mohawk River Watershed Flooding • In 2013/14, completed 13 state-of- the-art flood studies completed in high priority watersheds § 4 - Oneida County § 8 – Herkimer § 1 – Montgomery • Schoharie Creek – initiated
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—House H7878
    H7878 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE July 17, 2007 center even exists. We don’t know if it The Acting CHAIRMAN. Pursuant to modifications committed to conference: even exists, if it’s created by this ear- clause 6 of rule XVIII, further pro- Messrs. Reyes, Cramer, and Hoekstra. mark. ceedings on the amendment offered by From the Committee on Science and Tech- Concurrent Technology has been the the gentleman from Arizona will be nology, for consideration of secs. 703, 1301, recipient of millions upon millions of 1464, 1467, and 1507 of the Senate amendment, postponed. and modifications committed to conference: dollars over the years. The executives Mr. VISCLOSKY. Mr. Chairman, I Messrs. Gordon of Tennessee, Wu, and in Concurrent Technology contribute move that the Committee do now rise. Gingrey. handsomely to Members of Congress. The motion was agreed to. From the Committee on Transportation So it receives a lot of earmarks. It Accordingly, the Committee rose; and Infrastructure, for consideration of Ti- seems to be an earmark incubator of and the Speaker pro tempore (Mr. tles I–III, sec. 1002, and Title XI of the House some type, an earmark that begets DAVIS of Illinois) having assumed the bill, and secs. 202, 301, Title IV, secs. 801–803, 807, 901, 1001, 1002, 1101–1103, 1422–1424, 1426, more earmarks. chair, Mr. TIERNEY, Chairman of the And yet we have the report that 1427, 1429, 1430, 1433, 1436–1438, 1441, 1443, 1444, Committee of the Whole House on the 1446, 1449, 1464, 1473, 1503, and 1605 of the Sen- comes with the bill that doesn’t even state of the Union, reported that that mention Concurrent Technology.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Economic Development Council Plans
    Governor Andrew M. Cuomo Regional EconomicAwards Development Council 2017 1 Table of Contents Regional Council Awards Western New York .........................................................................................................................10 Finger Lakes ...................................................................................................................................24 Southern Tier ..................................................................................................................................36 Central New York ..........................................................................................................................48 Mohawk Valley ...............................................................................................................................62 North Country .................................................................................................................................74 Capital Region ................................................................................................................................85 Mid-Hudson .....................................................................................................................................98 New York City ................................................................................................................................ 114 Long Island ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]