DOCSLIB.ORG

Progress of Stream Measurements

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Progress of Stream Measurements Water-Supply and Irrigation Paper No. 125 Series P, Hydrographic Progress Reports, 30 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES D. WALCOTT, DIRECTOR REPORT PROGRESS OF STREAM MEASUREMENTS THE CALENDAR YEAR 1904 PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF F. H. NEWELL BY R. E. HORTON, N. C. GROVER, and JOHN C. HOYT PART II. Hudson, Passaic, Raritan, and Delaware River Drainages WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1905 Water-Supply and Irrigation Paper No. 125 Series P, Hydrographic Progress Reports, 30 i DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES D. WALCOTT, DIRECTOR REPORT PROGRESS OF STREAM MEASUREMENTS THE CALENDAR YEAR 1904 PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF F. H. NEWELL BY R. E. HORTON, N. C. GROVER, and JOHN C. HOYT PART II. Hudson, Passaic, Raritan, and Delaware River Drainages WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1905 CONTENTS. Letter of transmittal...................................................... 7 Introduction............................................................. 9 Cooperation and acknowledgments ...... ...^.............................. 18 Hudson Eiver drainage basin. ............................................ 19 Hudson Eiver at Fort Edward, N. Y .............................. 19 Hudson Eiver at Mechanicsville, N. Y............................. 22 Indian Eiver at Indian Lake, Hamilton County, N. Y.............. 24 Hoosic Eiver at Buskirk, N. Y .................................... 24 Mohawk River at Little Falls, N. Y................................ 26 Mohawk Eiver at Dunsbach Ferry Bridge, N. Y.................... 29 Oriskany Creek near Oriskany, N. Y .............................. 32 Starch Factory Creek near New Hartford, N. Y.................... 35 Sylvan Glen Creek near New Hartford, N. Y....................... 37 Graefenberg Creek near New Hartford, N. Y....................... 39 Eeels Creek and Johnston Brook near Deer-field, N. Y.............. 41 Nail Creek at Utica, N. Y......................................... 45 West Canada Creek at Twin Eock Bridge, N. Y.................... 46 East Canada Creek at Dolgeville, N. Y ............................ 50 Schoharie Creek at Prattsville, N. Y............................... 54 Batavia Kill near Prattsville, N. Y ................................ 59 Catskill Creek at South Cairo, N. Y ............................... 60 Esopus Creek near Olivebridge, N. Y.............................. 63 Esopus Creek at Kingston, N. Y................................... 66 Wappinger Creek near Wappinger Falls, N. Y ..................... 70 Croton Eiver at old Croton dam, New York........................ 71 Miscellaneous measurements...................................... 73 Passaic Eiver drainage basin .............................................. 73 Passaic Eiver at Millington, N. J.................................. 74 Passaic Eiver near Chatham, N. J................................. 76 Pompton River at Pompton Plains, N. J ........................... 78 Eamapo Eiver near Mahwah, N. J ................................. 79 Wanaque Eiver at Wanaque, N. J................................. 82 Eockaway Eiver near Boonton, N. J............................... 84 Earitan Eiver drainage basin.............................................. 84 Earitan Eiver (South Branch) at Stanton, N. J..................... 85 Earitan Eiver at Finderne, N. J. .................................. 87 Earitan Eiver at Boundbrook, N. J................................ 90 Earitan Eiver (North Branch) near Pluckemin, N. J ............... 91 Millstone Eiver at Millstone, N. J...............................'.. 93 Delaware Eiver drainage basin ............................................ 94 Delaware Eiver (West Branch) at Hancock, N. Y.................. 96 Delaware Eiver (East Branch) at Hancock, N. Y................... 98 Delaware Eiver at Lambertville, N. J. -......--.....--.-.-.--..--.. 99 Lehigh Eiver near South Bethlehem, Pa........................... 101 Musconetcong Eiver near Bloomsbury, N. J........................ 102 Tohickon Creek at Point Pleasant, Pa.............................. 104 Neshaminy Creek at forks, Pennsylvania .......................... 105 Schuylkill Eiver near Philadelphia, Pa ............................ 107 Perkiomen Creek at Frederick, Pa...........-.-.--.........-..-.-- 108 [ndex .............-...........-.-.......-.-.-...-.-....-............-..- HI 3 ILLUSTRATIONS. Page. PLATE I. Map showing location of principal gaging stations in the United States ....................................................... 10 II. Price current meters, with buzzers,...................--....----- 12 Fia. 1. Cable station, showing section of the river, car, gage, etc ............ 11 5 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, HYDROGRAPHIC BRANCH, Washington, D. C., May 4, 1905- SIR: I transmit herewith the manuscript of Part II of a series of twelve papers which compose the Report of Progress of Stream Meas­ urements for the Calendar Year 1901. Parts I to VI of this report contain the results of the data collected in the territory east of Missis­ sippi River. Parts VII to XII are devoted to the data collected in the territory west of Mississippi River. The larger part of the original data for this report was collected under the direction of district hydrographers R. E. Horton and N. C. Grover. Mr. Horton had charge of the work in New York, and was assisted by C. C. Covert and H. R. Beebe. The computations for that portion of the report were made under the direction of Mr. Horton. Mr. Grover had charge of the work in New Jersey, and was assisted by F. H. Tillinghast and Frank H. Brundage. A limited amount of the data was collected by other parties, as shown in the list of acknowl­ edgments. The assembling of the data and its preparation for pub­ lication were done under the direction of J. C. Hoyt, who has been assisted by R. H. Bolster, Robert Follansbee, W. E. Hall, F. H. Tilling­ hast, H. D. Padgett, and A. H. Horton. I request that this manuscript be published as one of the series of Water-Supply and Irrigation Papers. Very respectfully, F. H. NEWELL, Chief Engineer. Hon. CHARLES D. WALCOTT, Director United States Geological Survey. 7 PROGRESS REPORT OF STREAM MEASUREMENTS FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1904. ii. By K. E. HORTON, N. C. GROVER, and J. C. HOTT. INTRODUCTION. The hydrographic work of the United States Geological Survey includes the collection of facts concerning and the study of conditions affecting the behavior of water from the time it reaches the earth as rain or snow until it joins the oceans or great navigable rivers. These investigations became a distinct feature of the work of the Survey in the fall of 1888, when an instruction camp was established at Embudo, N. Mex. Since that date the work has been continually and gradually extended as larger funds became available. The first distinctive appropriation for gaging streams was made by the act of August 18, 1894, which contained an item of $12,500, " for gaging the streams and determining the water supply of the United States, including the investigation of underground currents and artesian wells in the arid and semiarid sections." (Digest of Appropriations for 1895, p. 270.) Since that time a similar act has been passed each year and the appropriations have gradually increased, as shown in the following table: Annual appropriations for hydrographic surveys. Year ending June 30, 1895 .............................................. $12, 500 Year ending June 30, 1896 .............................................. 25,000 Year ending June 30, 1897 .............................................. 50,000 Year ending June 30, 1898 .............................................. 50,000 Year ending June 30, 1899 .............................................. 50,000 Year ending June 30, 1900 .............................................. 50, 000 Year ending June 30, 1901 .............................................. 100,000 Year ending June 30, 1902 .............................................. 100,000 Year ending June 30, 1903 .............................................. 200,000 Year ending June 30, 1904 .............................................. 200,000 Year ending June 30, 1905 .............................................. 200,000 Year ending June 30, 1906 .............................................. 200,000 9 10 STREAM MEASUREMENTS IN 1904, PART II. [NO 125. The chief feature of the work of the hydrographic division is the systematic study of the flow of the surface waters and the conditions affecting the same. In this connection other information that may be of use to the engineer or others in hyclrographic studies, such as river profiles, duration and extent of damage by floods, water-power data, etc., is collected. Furthermore, the work has been so directed that the information collected will be of direct value in the commercial and agricultural development of the country. As a result of the increased appropriations since June 30, 1902, the work has been largely extended and thoroughly systemized. The various States have been grouped into districts, each of which is under the supervision of a district hydrographer who, with a corps of assist­ ants, devotes his whole time to the study of the hydrographic resources of his district. The methods used in the collection of these data and in their prepa­ ration for publication are given in detail in Water-Supply Paper No. 94. (Hydrographic Manual, U. S. Geol. Survey.) The general plan of stream gaging which
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mohawk River Watershed – HUC-12
    ID Number Name of Mohawk Watershed 1 Switz Kill 2 Flat Creek 3 Headwaters West Creek 4 Kayaderosseras Creek 5 Little Schoharie Creek 6 Headwaters Mohawk River 7 Headwaters Cayadutta Creek 8 Lansing Kill 9 North Creek 10 Little West Kill 11 Irish Creek 12 Auries Creek 13 Panther Creek 14 Hinckley Reservoir 15 Nowadaga Creek 16 Wheelers Creek 17 Middle Canajoharie Creek 18 Honnedaga 19 Roberts Creek 20 Headwaters Otsquago Creek 21 Mill Creek 22 Lewis Creek 23 Upper East Canada Creek 24 Shakers Creek 25 King Creek 26 Crane Creek 27 South Chuctanunda Creek 28 Middle Sprite Creek 29 Crum Creek 30 Upper Canajoharie Creek 31 Manor Kill 32 Vly Brook 33 West Kill 34 Headwaters Batavia Kill 35 Headwaters Flat Creek 36 Sterling Creek 37 Lower Ninemile Creek 38 Moyer Creek 39 Sixmile Creek 40 Cincinnati Creek 41 Reall Creek 42 Fourmile Brook 43 Poentic Kill 44 Wilsey Creek 45 Lower East Canada Creek 46 Middle Ninemile Creek 47 Gooseberry Creek 48 Mother Creek 49 Mud Creek 50 North Chuctanunda Creek 51 Wharton Hollow Creek 52 Wells Creek 53 Sandsea Kill 54 Middle East Canada Creek 55 Beaver Brook 56 Ferguson Creek 57 West Creek 58 Fort Plain 59 Ox Kill 60 Huntersfield Creek 61 Platter Kill 62 Headwaters Oriskany Creek 63 West Kill 64 Headwaters South Branch West Canada Creek 65 Fly Creek 66 Headwaters Alplaus Kill 67 Punch Kill 68 Schenevus Creek 69 Deans Creek 70 Evas Kill 71 Cripplebush Creek 72 Zimmerman Creek 73 Big Brook 74 North Creek 75 Upper Ninemile Creek 76 Yatesville Creek 77 Concklin Brook 78 Peck Lake-Caroga Creek 79 Metcalf Brook 80 Indian
    [Show full text]
  • Stateofnewyork 9054--Binasse
    S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K ________________________________________________________________________ 9054--B I N A S S E M B L Y January 17, 2012 ___________ A BUDGET BILL, submitted by the Governor pursuant to article seven of the Constitution -- read once and referred to the Committee on Ways and Means -- committee discharged, bill amended, ordered reprinted as amended and recommitted to said committee -- again reported from said committee with amendments, ordered reprinted as amended and recommit- ted to said committee AN ACT making appropriations for the support of government CAPITAL PROJECTS BUDGET THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM- BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: 1 Section 1. a) The several amounts specified in this chapter for capi- 2 tal projects, or so much thereof as shall be necessary to accomplish the 3 purpose of the appropriations, are appropriated by comprehensive 4 construction programs (hereinafter referred to by the abbreviation CCP), 5 purposes, and projects designated by the appropriations, and authorized 6 to be made available as hereinafter provided to the respective public 7 officers; such appropriations shall be deemed to provide all costs 8 necessary and pertinent to accomplish the intent of the appropriations 9 and are appropriated in accordance with the provisions of section 93 of 10 the state finance law. 11 b) Any amounts specified in this chapter for advances for capital 12 projects, or so much thereof as shall be necessary to accomplish the 13 purpose of the appropriations, are appropriated by comprehensive 14 construction programs (hereinafter referred to by the abbreviation CCP), 15 purposes and projects designated by the appropriations as advances from 16 the capital projects fund in accordance with the provisions of sections 17 40-a and 93 of the state finance law, and are authorized to be paid as 18 hereinafter provided as an advance for a share, part or whole of the 19 cost for such programs, purposes and projects hereinafter specified.
    [Show full text]
  • Champlain Canalway Trail 2018 Action Plan
    Champlain Canalway Trail 2018 Action Plan Presentation To Washington County Adhoc Trails Committee Meeting January 16, 2019 The Setting Saratoga & Washington Counties 19 Municipalities 3 Rivers: Mohawk River; Hudson River; Batten Kill 3 Canals: Champlain Barge Canal Old Champlain Canal Glens Falls Feeder Canal 2 The Partners ▪ Champlain Canalway Trail Working Group ▪ Assisted by a Hudson River Valley Greenway Grant ▪ Administered through the Town of Stillwater ▪ Washington County & Saratoga County Planning Departments ▪ Empire State Trail ▪ Hudson River Valley Greenway, Saratoga and Washington Counties and the private sector will complete 3 Regional Context The CCT received a boost from Governor Cuomo’s Empire State Trail initiative to create a continuous 750-mile route spanning the state from New York City to Canada and Buffalo to Albany, creating the longest multi-use state trail in the nation. 4 Regional Context 5 The 2020 CCT Trail Vision ▪ Establish a continuous 77-mile multi- use trail from Waterford to Whitehall along the Hudson River and Champlain Canal. ▪ Utilize the historic Champlain Canalway Towpath, Champlain Canal shoreline, existing local and regional trails, and on-street bicycle routes. ▪ Link the region’s historic, cultural, natural and recreational assets into a system of interconnected canal lock parks, visitor centers, downtowns. ▪ Coordinate marketing with Empire State Trail. ▪ Establish a world-class destination for residents and visitors. 6 Accomplishments and Gaps 77.65 TOTAL MILES OF LINEAR TRAIL (INCLUDING THE
    [Show full text]
  • Erie Canalway Map & Guide
    National Park Service Erie Canalway National Heritage Corridor U.S. Department of the Interior Erie Canalway Map & Guide Pittsford, Frank Forte Pittsford, The New York State Canal System—which includes the Erie, Champlain, Cayuga-Seneca, and Oswego Canals—is the centerpiece of the Erie Canalway National Heritage Corridor. Experience the enduring legacy of this National Historic Landmark by boat, bike, car, or on foot. Discover New York’s Dubbed the “Mother of Cities” the canal fueled the growth of industries, opened the nation to settlement, and made New York the Empire State. (Clinton Square, Syracuse, 1905, courtesy Library of Congress, Prints & Photographs Division, Detroit Publishing Extraordinary Canals Company Collection.) pened in 1825, New York’s canals are a waterway link from the Atlantic Ocean to the Great Lakes through the heart of upstate New York. Through wars and peacetime, prosperity and This guide presents exciting Orecession, flood and drought, this exceptional waterway has provided a living connection things to do, places to go, to a proud past and a vibrant future. Built with leadership, ingenuity, determination, and hard work, and exceptional activities to the canals continue to remind us of the qualities that make our state and nation great. They offer us enjoy. Welcome! inspiration to weather storms and time-tested knowledge that we will prevail. Come to New York’s canals this year. Touch the building stones CONTENTS laid by immigrants and farmers 200 years ago. See century-old locks, lift Canals and COVID-19 bridges, and movable dams constructed during the canal’s 20th century Enjoy Boats and Boating Please refer to current guidelines and enlargement and still in use today.
    [Show full text]
  • Progress of Stream Measurements
    Water-Supply and Irrigation Paper No. 166 Series P, Hydrographic Progress Reports, 42 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES D. WALCOTT, DIKECTOK REPORT PROGRESS OF STREAM MEASUREMENTS FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1905 PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF F. H. NEWELL PART II. Hudson, Passaic, Raritan, and Delaware River Drainages BY R. E. HORTON, N. C. GROVER, and JOHN C. HOYT WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1906 Water-Supply and Irrigation Paper No. 166 Series P, HydwgrapMe Progress Reporte, 42 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES D. WALCOTT, DlKECTOK REPORT PROGRESS OF STREAM MEASUREMENTS THE CALENDAR YEAR 1905 PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF F. H. NEWELL PART II. Hudson, Passaic, Raritan, and Delaware River Drainages » BY R. E. HORTON, N. C. GROVER, and JOHN C. HOYT WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1906 CONTENTS. Page. Introduction......-...-...................___......_.....-.---...-----.-.-- 5 Organization and scope of work.........____...__...-...--....----------- 5 Definitions............................................................ 7 Explanation of tables...............................-..--...------.----- 8 Convenient equivalents.....-......._....____...'.--------.----.--------- 9 Field methods of measuring stream flow................................... 10 Office methods of computing run-off...................................... 14 Cooperation and acknowledgments................--..-...--..-.-....-..- 16 Hudson River drainage basin...............................................
    [Show full text]
  • New York Freshwater Fishing Regulations Guide: 2015-16
    NEW YORK Freshwater FISHING2015–16 OFFICIAL REGULATIONS GUIDE VOLUME 7, ISSUE NO. 1, APRIL 2015 Fishing for Muskie www.dec.ny.gov Most regulations are in effect April 1, 2015 through March 31, 2016 MESSAGE FROM THE GOVERNOR New York: A State of Angling Opportunity When it comes to freshwater fishing, no state in the nation can compare to New York. Our Great Lakes consistently deliver outstanding fishing for salmon and steelhead and it doesn’t stop there. In fact, New York is home to four of the Bassmaster’s top 50 bass lakes, drawing anglers from around the globe to come and experience great smallmouth and largemouth bass fishing. The crystal clear lakes and streams of the Adirondack and Catskill parks make New York home to the very best fly fishing east of the Rockies. Add abundant walleye, panfish, trout and trophy muskellunge and northern pike to the mix, and New York is clearly a state of angling opportunity. Fishing is a wonderful way to reconnect with the outdoors. Here in New York, we are working hard to make the sport more accessible and affordable to all. Over the past five years, we have invested more than $6 million, renovating existing boat launches and developing new ones across the state. This is in addition to the 50 new projects begun in 2014 that will make it easier for all outdoors enthusiasts to access the woods and waters of New York. Our 12 DEC fish hatcheries produce 900,000 pounds of fish each year to increase fish populations and expand and improve angling opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vermont Management Plan for Brook, Brown and Rainbow Trout Vermont Fish and Wildlife Department January 2018
    The Vermont Management Plan for Brook, Brown and Rainbow Trout Vermont Fish and Wildlife Department January 2018 Prepared by: Rich Kirn, Fisheries Program Manager Reviewed by: Brian Chipman, Will Eldridge, Jud Kratzer, Bret Ladago, Chet MacKenzie, Adam Miller, Pete McHugh, Lee Simard, Monty Walker, Lael Will ACKNOWLEDGMENT: This project was made possible by fishing license sales and matching Dingell- Johnson/Wallop-Breaux funds available through the Federal Sportfish Restoration Act. Table of Contents I. Introduction ......................................................................................... 1 II. Life History and Ecology ................................................................... 2 III. Management History ......................................................................... 7 IV. Status of Existing Fisheries ............................................................. 13 V. Management of Trout Habitat .......................................................... 17 VI. Management of Wild Trout............................................................. 34 VII. Management of Cultured Trout ..................................................... 37 VIII. Management of Angler Harvest ................................................... 66 IX. Trout Management Plan Goals, Objectives and Strategies .............. 82 X. Summary of Laws and Regulations .................................................. 87 XI. Literature Cited ............................................................................... 92 I. Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • ADOPT-A-TRAIL PERMIT APPLICATION CANALWAY TRAIL INSTRUCTIONS: • Applicant Completes All Applicable Information in Sections I & II
    (12/2016) New York State Canal Corporation P.O. Box 22058 Albany, NY 12201-2058 www.canals.ny.gov ADOPT-A-TRAIL PERMIT APPLICATION CANALWAY TRAIL INSTRUCTIONS: • Applicant completes all applicable information in Sections I & II. • Submit completed Application to the appropriate Canal Corporation Permit Office (see Section III). Section I Applicant Information Name E-mail Address Street Address City State Zip Code - County Work Phone No. Home Phone No. Fax No. ( ) - ( ) - ( ) - Section II Permit Information Work and Occupancy Permit No. (if pre-existing) Duration of Work (if applicable) Date Work Begins: Date Work Ends: Type of Work to be Done Description of Canal Property (including existing structures and map or sketch showing adjacent owners, streets, etc.) Location of Canal Property Applicant Signature Date Second Applicant Signature (if joint application) Date Section III Canal Corporation Division Offices Division Limits Eastern Division Western Division Albany Office: Erie Canal River from the Hudson River to the Syracuse Office: Erie Canal from Oneida Lake (excluding Montgomery/Herkimer County line; Champlain Canal; Glens Falls Sylvan and Verona Beaches) to the Monroe/Wayne County Feeder Canal; Port Henry Terminal; and Wilcox Dock (City of line; Oswego Canal; Cayuga-Seneca Canal; Jamesville and Plattsburgh). DeRuyter Reservoirs; and Cazenovia Lake. Utica Office: Erie Canal from the Herkimer/Montgomery County Buffalo Office: Erie Canal from the Monroe/Wayne County line to the east end of Oneida Lake (including Sylvan and Verona line to the Niagara River. Beaches); Adirondack Canal Lands and all other Reservoirs and Feeder Canals in Oneida, Madison and Herkimer Counties with the exception of DeRuyter Reservoir and Cazenovia Lake.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Public Comment on Draft Trout Stream Management Plan
    Assessment of public comments on draft New York State Trout Stream Management Plan OCTOBER 27, 2020 Andrew M. Cuomo, Governor | Basil Seggos, Commissioner A draft of the Fisheries Management Plan for Inland Trout Streams in New York State (Plan) was released for public review on May 26, 2020 with the comment period extending through June 25, 2020. Public comment was solicited through a variety of avenues including: • a posting of the statewide public comment period in the Environmental Notice Bulletin (ENB), • a DEC news release distributed statewide, • an announcement distributed to all e-mail addresses provided by participants at the 2017 and 2019 public meetings on trout stream management described on page 11 of the Plan [353 recipients, 181 unique opens (58%)], and • an announcement distributed to all subscribers to the DEC Delivers Freshwater Fishing and Boating Group [138,122 recipients, 34,944 unique opens (26%)]. A total of 489 public comments were received through e-mail or letters (Appendix A, numbered 1-277 and 300-511). 471 of these comments conveyed specific concerns, recommendations or endorsements; the other 18 comments were general statements or pertained to issues outside the scope of the plan. General themes to recurring comments were identified (22 total themes), and responses to these are included below. These themes only embrace recommendations or comments of concern. Comments that represent favorable and supportive views are not included in this assessment. Duplicate comment source numbers associated with a numbered theme reflect comments on subtopics within the general theme. Theme #1 The statewide catch and release (artificial lures only) season proposed to run from October 16 through March 31 poses a risk to the sustainability of wild trout populations and the quality of the fisheries they support that is either wholly unacceptable or of great concern, particularly in some areas of the state; notably Delaware/Catskill waters.
    [Show full text]
  • Courier Subject Index
    New York State Covered Bridge Society Empire State Courier Subject Index Advertising signs June 1972, p 4 & 5; March 1975, p 6; November 1978, p 1 & 7; November 1979, p 1 & 3 (P); July 1980, p 8; November 1980, p 2 & 8 (P); March 1985, p 4 & 5; July 1986, p 6; July 1988, p 1 & 8 (P) Alaska 1st Judicial Div. Hyder September 1970, p 3 3rd Judicial Div. Afognak Island September 1970, p 1 Alaska's bridges September 1970, p 1 & 3 Allen, Richard Sanders November 1980, p 3 (P); March 1984, p 5 & 7 (P) Anderson, Stott October 1972, p 5 (P) Arizona November 1978, p 2 (P) Gila County Roberts Ranch June 1969, p 3 Maricopa County Tempe August 1967, p 5 Navajo County Maureta B. Thomas Memorial November 1978, p 2 Arizona bridges August 1967, p 5 (P); June 1969, p 3 (P) Arm chair covered bridging June 1973, p 3 & 5 Arson September 1966, p 1; August 1967, p 7 & 8; December 1967, p 4; June 1968, p 5 (P); February 1969, p 4; September 1970, p 2; November 1971, p 3 & 6; February 1972, p 2 (P); November 1976, p 3 (P); July 1978, p 7; July 1981, p 2 Auvil, Myrtle March 1986, p 5 (P) Books Alabama's Covered Bridges, past and April 1974, p 6 present by A.G. Prince Covered Bridges of Mass., A Guide by July 1978, p 7 A. R. Howard Covered Bridges of Somerset County, March 1980, p 2 PA by Sheldon Barkman Covered Bridges of the Middle Atlantic September 1966, p 8 States by R.
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Fishing: a Driver for Ecotourism
    New York FRESHWATER April 2019 FISHINGDigest Fishing: A Sport For Everyone NY Fishing 101 page 10 A Female's Guide to Fishing page 30 A summary of 2019–2020 regulations and useful information for New York anglers www.dec.ny.gov Message from the Governor Freshwater Fishing: A Driver for Ecotourism New York State is committed to increasing and supporting a wide array of ecotourism initiatives, including freshwater fishing. Our approach is simple—we are strengthening our commitment to protect New York State’s vast natural resources while seeking compelling ways for people to enjoy the great outdoors in a socially and environmentally responsible manner. The result is sustainable economic activity based on a sincere appreciation of our state’s natural resources and the values they provide. We invite New Yorkers and visitors alike to enjoy our high-quality water resources. New York is blessed with fisheries resources across the state. Every day, we manage and protect these fisheries with an eye to the future. To date, New York has made substantial investments in our fishing access sites to ensure that boaters and anglers have safe and well-maintained parking areas, access points, and boat launch sites. In addition, we are currently investing an additional $3.2 million in waterway access in 2019, including: • New or renovated boat launch sites on Cayuga, Oneida, and Otisco lakes • Upgrades to existing launch sites on Cranberry Lake, Delaware River, Lake Placid, Lake Champlain, Lake Ontario, Chautauqua Lake and Fourth Lake. New York continues to improve and modernize our fish hatcheries. As Governor, I have committed $17 million to hatchery improvements.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of the New York State 2010 Section 303(D
    Library Reference 1.2 Summary of the New York State 2010 Section 303(d) List of Impaired Waters Requiring a TMDL/Other Strategy (June, 2010) for Onondaga Lake, Tributaries, and Seneca River. Complete 303(d) list is attached. (Changes from the 2008 List are noted as: Blue = additions; Red = deletions) Water body Type Class Cause/Pollutant Source Year Waterbodies for which TMDL Development May be Deferred (Requiring Verification of Cause/Pollutant): * Seneca River, Lower, Main Stem River C D.O./Oxygen Demand InvSpp, Agric. 1998 (0701-0001) Seneca River, Lower, Main Stem River C D.O./Oxygen Demand InvSpp, Agric. 1998 (0701-0008) Multiple Segment/Categorical Impaired Waterbody Segments (fish consumption): Onondaga Lake, northern end Lake B Dioxin Contam. Sed. 1998 (0702-0003) Mercury Contam. Sed. 1998 PCBs, other toxics Contam. Sed. 1998 Onondaga Lake, southern end Lake C Dioxin Contam. Sed. 1998 (0702-0021)84 Mercury Contam. Sed. 1998 PCBs, other toxics Contam. Sed. 1998 Waterbodies for which TMDL Development May be Deferred (Requiring Verification of Impairment): Seneca River River C Pathogens On-site WTS 1998 (0701-0008) Onondaga Creek, Middle, River B Turbidity Streambank 2008 and tribs (0702-0004) Erosion Onondaga Creek, Upper, and tribs River C Turbidity Streambank 2008 (0702-0024) Erosion Waterbodies for which TMDL Development May be Deferred (Pending Implementation/Evaluation of Other Restoration Measures): Onondaga Lake Outlet102 River B D.O./Oxygen Muni, Urban 2008 (0702-0020) Demand Onondaga Lake, southern end102 Lake C Pathogens
    [Show full text]