Carter Cabinet Choice Speculation Begins

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Carter Cabinet Choice Speculation Begins •); • v" '/-'V . W PAGE THIRTY - MANCHESTER EVENING HERALD. Manchester. Conn., Wed., Nov. 3, 1976 Growing older I Social Security Social Security unfair to women The weather Inside today Q. My sister's vision has gradualiy gotten worse By Harold Blumenfeld Variable cloudinesg today, high In because of advanced diabetes. She w ork^ steadiiy under SOt. Tonight, partly cloudy, low In 30a. Area news .. .22-23 Family..............6-7 Friday, partly aunny, high 48-52. Business...........20 Gardening..........24 Social Security up until about a year ago. Can she qualify The Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) keeps cropping Chance of precipitation 10 per cent for disabiiity benefits? Security was set up in a way to discourage women from being unfairly taxed because the deductions from their Comics............ 31 Obituaries..........16 up. It has i^ vehement defenders and its equally vocal competing in the labor market because unemployment pay checks are based on paying for survivor benefits or tonight and Friday. National weather Dear Abby....... 31 Sr. Citizens .... 27 A. Peopie whose vision is no better than 20/200 even opponents. forecaat map on Page 29. with glasses, or whose visuai field is limited to 20 degrees was at p all-time high. It was assumed that the female survivors they will never have. Editorial ............4 Sports.............17-19 Some who are antagonistic to ERA grudgingly admit population would be content to be homemakers and that A wife may give her husband "the best years” of her or less, are considered disabled on the basis of blindness some disparity of wages for similar work with the ladies under the Social Security law. Your sister should apply “the little woman” would remain married to her mate life. But if those "best” years last less than 20 years — getting the short end of the stick. But they still adamantly 'til death did them part. And she would be the beneficiary when she might have remained out of the labor markef t o for benefits at any Social Security office. To get benefits, oppose the amendment for a variety of other reasons. she must be severely disabled and not expected to be able of his Social Security benefits upon his retirement or raise children — she loses her share of benefits basedton These die-hards usually bring up the question of common death. to work for a year or more. her former husband’s earnings. toilets, something which has never b ^ n remotely been The situation today is quite different. More and more Some working wives who have yearly paid into Social Q. What things do I need to report to Social Security advocated by the proponents of ERA. But seldom does after I start getting Supplemental Security Income women are working out of necessity or choice. Also, not Security for years may resent a system that gives depen­ one hear about the gross inequities of the Social Security (SSI)? all women marry. And the shocking statistics on divorce dent nonworking wives benefits without ever having con­ system as it applies to the fair sex. indicate about one in three marriages become unstuck. tributed because they had no taxable earnings. And these Carter Cabinet choice A. Here are some of the more important things Social From time to time some suggestions have been made to When a working wife retires at age 62 or 65, she is en­ same dependent wives, who have never worked outside Security should be told right away: If you move, if your eliminate this discrimination against women in the income increases or decreases, if there’s a big change in titled to Social Security payments. She has her choice of the home, also have a gripe. Sincq they have never had system but they have been discarded as either unfeasible, collecting on her own earnings, usually less than her any taxable income, they are not entitled to disability the things you own (such as buying or selling a car or unwieldy, or too expensive. home,) or if you start living in someone else's home. The husband’s, or 50 per cent of her husband’s retirement protection. Donald Fraser (D-Minn.) has suggested a possible solu­ benefit;, whichever is the larger sum. But she can’t have Because of other inequities in the system, more and speculation begins Social Security office has a free leaflet called "Important tion. His idea is for a husband and wife to pool their ear­ information about your SSI income payments” that tells both even though each contributed to the system. If she more widows and widowers are living "in sin” without nings in computing Social Security benefits, as is often opts for half of her husband’s payments, she loses all her benefit of clergy. If they marry, the widow loses her more about what you should report. done in filing joint tax returns. Each would have his and WASHINGTON (UPI) - It didn’t George Ball, Cyrus Vance or Paul predicted Carter would tap United Q. I need a Social Security card but don’t like the idea benefits even though deductions from her pay checks deceased husband’s Social Security allowance which is her own separate accounting and would be credited with take long after Jimmy Carter sewed Warnke. Auto Workers President Leonard of having to answer a lot of personal questions on the have been made, perhaps for years. considerably more than she would be receiving as a new 50 per cent of their combined earnings or 75 per cent of If she chooses to collect Social Security on the basis of bride, collecting only half of her new husband’s benefits. up the presidency for the capital to Defense secretary — AFL-CIO Woodcock, who is known to be in­ application. Why can’t I jiist give you my name and you the higher income, whichever is larger. begin armchair speculating on who President George Meany, according terested. give me the card and number? her own earnings, she then forfeits the dependent wife’s These oldsters are now "with it” ; doing what the young When the original program was started in the 1930s, the will be in the new Cabinet. to aides, would be pleased to see Agriculture secretary — P.R. A. A certain amount of basic information — such as benefits which her husband’s Social Security payments ones are doing these days. And why not? Blame it on the nation was recovering from the big Depression. Social It is a game played, essentially, in Schlesinger get this job back, and "Bobby” Smith, who managed date and place of birth— are needed so Social Security were to have provided for her. "new” morality or the "old” injustices of our present the dark. Carter and his aides have Carter had Meany’s unqualified sup­ Carter’s farm policy campaign; can keep an accurate record of your work and earnings. Single women who never marry often feel they are Social Security system. given no clues who will be selected. port in the campaign. Others have Reps. Bob Bergland, D-Mlnn., and Future benefits will depend on that record. Under the And Hamilton Jordan, Carter’s suggested perhaps Vance, a former Neal Smith, D-Iowa, or some state law, the information about you on your Social Security THE campaign manager, once suggested Army secretary, or Harold Brown, farm official from the Midwest or record is confidential. LOWEST in an interview that the Carter ad­ formergAir Force secretary. Q. After working 12 years under Social Security, 1 Great Plains. One Democratic Oetltat ministration will be staffed at the top LabOT secretary — Meany thinks an recently accepted a federal job and am now under Civil FOOD mcT source predicted “a fresh face, not a by persons not known nationally. If "obvious” choice would te John Service. Do I lose the Social Security protection I built retread” from a previous ad­ Top Notch. PRICES FUU well-known' figures are named, he Dunlop, who resigned from that post up? ministration. IN $ n v K t said, the Carter drive will have nearly a year ago after President A. Since you have at least 10 years coverage, you're in­ m r luawwa M—i iawi Attorney general — Judge Griffin TOOl failed. Ford vetoed a construction industry sured for life for Social Security retirement, medical TOW N ! B. Bell of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court Nonetheless, familiar Democrats picketing bill he had promised hospital Insurance, and survivor's benefits. However, the of Appeals, who is close to Carter’s from past administration figured in Dunlop he would sign. Other labor benefit amount you or your family might get will gradual­ friend and political adviser, Charles the first wave of speculation. sources considered Dunlop a likely ly decrease in future years as your average earnings TOO NO?CN IS Kirbo. Robert M. Morgenthau Jr. son Jack Watson, an Atlanta attorney choice. covered by Social SecuHty, upon which the amount is LOOK FOITIiSESIUS.. NOT OMN SWMATSI of the late U.S. Treasury secretary who has been working since August based, declines. You will be insured for Social Security n iT MAM niMS TRAT UVI m Secretary of Health, Education and and a former U.S. attorney in New UIQREHOUSE PRICED disability benefits for only about five years. R W K B IV n low a TIAI ON (EIITE on transition plans, said in an inter­ Welfare — Those same labor sources York City is another possibility. view last week that Carter will “per- Q. My friend Jim and I are exactly the same age and we low ir a r u T m a il FOR EUEd both earned maximum wages covered by Social Security CRERTER snuincs> CHUCK sonaily choose his Cabinet for at least 10 years.
Recommended publications
  • Election Calendars: Key Dates to Remember. 2020 Congressional Primary Calendar
    Election Calendars: Key Dates to Remember. 2020 Congressional Primary Calendar January February March April May June July August September October November December Primaries Election Day Congressional Primaries Major-party Major-party State Date State Date filing deadline filing deadline Alabama Mar. 3 Nov. 8, 2019 South Carolina Jun. 9 Mar. 30 Arkansas Mar. 3 Nov. 11, 2019 Virginia Jun. 9 Mar. 26 California Mar. 3 Dec. 6, 2019 New York Jun. 23 Apr. 2 North Carolina Mar. 3 Dec. 20, 2019 Utah Jun. 23 Mar. 19 Texas Mar. 3 Dec. 9, 2019 Colorado Jun. 30 Mar. 17 Mississippi Mar. 10 Jan. 15 Oklahoma Jun. 30 Apr. 10 Ohio Mar. 17 Dec. 18, 2019 Arizona Aug. 4 Apr. 6 Illinois Mar. 17 Dec. 2, 2019 Kansas Aug. 4 Jun. 1 Maryland Apr. 28 Feb. 5 Michigan Aug. 4 Apr. 21 Pennsylvania Apr. 28 Feb. 18 Missouri Aug. 4 Mar. 31 Indiana May 5 Feb. 7 Washington Aug. 4 May 15 Nebraska May 12 Feb. 18 (incumbents); Tennessee Aug. 6 Apr. 2 Mar. 2 (non-incumbents) Hawaii Aug. 8 Jun. 2 West Virginia May 12 Jan. 25 Connecticut Aug. 11 Jun. 9 Georgia May 19 Mar. 6 Minnesota Aug. 11 Jun. 2 Idaho May 19 Mar. 13 Vermont Aug. 11 May 28 Kentucky May 19 Jan. 28 Wisconsin Aug. 11 Jun. 1 Oregon May 19 Mar. 10 Alaska Aug. 18 Jun. 1 Iowa Jun. 2 Mar. 13 Florida Aug. 18 Apr. 24 Montana Jun. 2 Mar. 9 Wyoming Aug. 18 May 29 New Jersey Jun. 2 Mar. 30 New Sept. 8 Jun.
    [Show full text]
  • Ronald Reagan, Louisiana, and the 1980 Presidential Election Matthew Ad Vid Caillet Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2011 "Are you better off "; Ronald Reagan, Louisiana, and the 1980 Presidential election Matthew aD vid Caillet Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Caillet, Matthew David, ""Are you better off"; Ronald Reagan, Louisiana, and the 1980 Presidential election" (2011). LSU Master's Theses. 2956. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/2956 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ―ARE YOU BETTER OFF‖; RONALD REAGAN, LOUISIANA, AND THE 1980 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in The Department of History By Matthew David Caillet B.A. and B.S., Louisiana State University, 2009 May 2011 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am indebted to many people for the completion of this thesis. Particularly, I cannot express how thankful I am for the guidance and assistance I received from my major professor, Dr. David Culbert, in researching, drafting, and editing my thesis. I would also like to thank Dr. Wayne Parent and Dr. Alecia Long for having agreed to serve on my thesis committee and for their suggestions and input, as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States
    Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States The Contemporary Debate over Supreme Court Reform: Origins and Perspectives Written Statement of Nikolas Bowie Assistant Professor of Law, Harvard Law School June 30, 2021 Co-Chair Rodriguez, Co-Chair Bauer, and members of the Commission, thank you for inviting me to testify. You have asked for my opinion about the causes of the current public debate over reforming the Supreme Court of the United States, the competing arguments for and against reform at this time, and how the commission should evaluate those arguments. The cause of the current public debate over reforming the Supreme Court is longstanding: Americans rightfully hold democracy as our highest political ideal, yet the Supreme Court is an antidemocratic institution. The primary source of concern is judicial review, or the power of the Court to decline to enforce a federal law when a majority of the justices disagree with a majority of Congress about the law’s constitutionality. I will focus on two arguments for reforming the Supreme Court, both of which object to the antidemocratic nature of judicial review. First, as a matter of historical practice, the Court has wielded an antidemocratic influence on American law, one that has undermined federal attempts to eliminate hierarchies of race, wealth, and status. Second, as a matter of political theory, the Court’s exercise of judicial review undermines the value that distinguishes democracy as an ideal form of government: its pursuit of political equality. Both arguments compete with counterarguments that judicial review is necessary to preserve the political equality of so-called discrete and insular minorities.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving the Top-Two Primary for Congressional and State Races
    Towards a More Perfect Election: Improving the Top-Two Primary for Congressional and State Races CHENWEI ZHANG* I. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................. 615 1I. B ACKGROUN D ................................................................................ 620 A. An Overview of the Law RegardingPrimaries ....................... 620 1. Types of Primaries............................................................ 620 2. Supreme Court JurisprudenceRegarding Political Partiesand Primaries....................................................... 622 B. The Evolution of the Top-Two Primary.................................. 624 1. A laska................................................................................ 62 5 2. L ouisiana .......................................................................... 625 3. California ......................................................................... 626 4. Washington ............................. ... 627 5. O regon ........................................... ................................... 630 I1. THE PROS AND CONS OF Top-Two PRIMARIES .............................. 630 A . P ros ......................................................................................... 63 1 1. ModeratingEffects ............................................................ 631 2. Increasing Voter Turnout................................................... 633 B . C ons ....................................................................................... 633
    [Show full text]
  • Documentation
    HOUSE BILL NO. 1 ENROLLED TABLE OF CONTENTS SCHEDULE 01 - EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT ..................................13 01-100 Executive Office ...........................................13 Administrative ..........................................13 Governor's Office of Coastal Activities .......................14 01-101 Office of Indian Affairs ......................................14 01-102 Office of the Inspector General ................................15 01-103 Mental Health Advocacy Service ..............................15 01-106 Louisiana Tax Commission ...................................16 01-107 Division of Administration ...................................17 Executive Administration ..................................17 Community Development Block Grant .......................17 Auxiliary Account .......................................18 01-109 Coastal Protection & Restoration Authority ......................19 01-111 Governor's Office of Homeland Security and Emergency Preparedness .........................................20 01-112 Department of Military Affairs ................................22 Military Affairs Program ..................................22 Education Program .......................................23 Auxiliary Account .......................................23 01-116 Louisiana Public Defender Board ..............................24 01-124 Louisiana Stadium and Exposition District .......................25 01-129 Louisiana Commission on Law Enforcement and the Administration of Criminal Justice ........................26
    [Show full text]
  • Democracy in the Age of Pandemic – Fair Vote UK Report June 2020
    Democracy in the Age of Pandemic How to Safeguard Elections & Ensure Government Continuity APPENDICES fairvote.uk Published June 2020 Appendix 1 - 86 1 Written Evidence, Responses to Online Questionnaire During the preparation of this report, Fair Vote UK conducted a call for written evidence through an online questionnaire. The questionnaire was open to all members of the public. This document contains the unedited responses from that survey. The names and organisations for each entry have been included in the interest of transparency. The text of the questionnaire is found below. It indicates which question each response corresponds to. Name Organisation (if applicable) Question 1: What weaknesses in democratic processes has Covid-19 highlighted? Question 2: Are you aware of any good articles/publications/studies on this subject? Or of any countries/regions that have put in place mediating practices that insulate it from the social distancing effects of Covid-19? Question 3: Do you have any ideas on how to address democratic shortcomings exposed by the impact of Covid-19? Appendix 1 - 86 2 Appendix 1 Name S. Holledge Organisation Question 1 Techno-phobia? Question 2 Estonia's e-society Question 3 Use technology and don't be frightened by it 2 Appendix 1 - 86 3 Appendix 2 Name S. Page Organisation Yes for EU (Scotland) Question 1 The Westminster Parliament is not fit for purpose Question 2 Scottish Parliament Question 3 Use the internet and electronic voting 3 Appendix 1 - 86 4 Appendix 3 Name J. Sanders Organisation emergency legislation without scrutiny removing civil liberties railroading powers through for example changes to mental health act that impact on individual rights (A) Question 1 I live in Wales, and commend Mark Drakeford for his quick response to the crisis by enabling the Assembly to continue to meet and debate online Question 2 no, not until you asked.
    [Show full text]
  • Louisiana Freight Mobility Plan December 2015
    Louisiana Freight Mobility Plan December 2015 prepared for prepared by Louisiana Freight Mobility Plan prepared for Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development prepared by CDM Smith Inc. December 2015 LOUISIANA FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Summary of Investment Recommendations ............................................................................. 1-2 1.1.1 Capital Investments ...................................................................................................... 1-2 1.2 Summary of Policy and Program Recommendations ................................................................ 1-2 1.2.1 Policy recommendations .............................................................................................. 1-3 1.2.2 Program recommendations .......................................................................................... 1-3 2. STRATEGIC GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ...................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Federal Requirements ............................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Coordination with Relevant Plans ............................................................................................. 2-2 2.2.1 Statewide Transportation Plan ..................................................................................... 2-2 2.2.2 Other
    [Show full text]
  • Landry, Celeste
    HB 5404: Study Ranked-Choice Voting in CT, Committee on Government Administration and Elections March 4, 2020 testimony by Celeste Landry, 745 University Ave, Boulder, CO 80302 Bio: I have been researching voting methods since 2012 and have given a variety of Voting Methods presentations including at the 2018 LWVUS convention, the 2019 Free and Equal Electoral Reform Symposium and the 2020 CO Dept of State Alternative Voting Method Stakeholder Group meeting. Four Proposed Amendments: Amendments #1 and #2 below address language in the current text, but Amendments #3 and #4 provide for better and broader resolutions to the bill’s limitations. Issue #1. The description of ranked-choice voting (RCV) in HB5404 is too limited. For instance, the 2018 Maine Congressional District 2 election would NOT fit the definition below: 6 are defeated and until one candidate receives over fifty per cent of the 7 votes cast, and (3) the candidate receiving over fifty per cent of the votes 8 cast is deemed to have been elected to such office. Such study shall Example: The Maine CD2 winner, Jared Golden, did NOT receive over 50% of the votes cast (144,813 out of 289,624). More people preferred Golden’s opponents to Golden. In the last round, Golden received over 50% of the votes if you only count the non-exhausted ballots. The definition of RCV in the bill effectively claims that more than two thousand cast votes were actually not cast! 2018 Maine CD2 election results: https://www.maine.gov/sos/cec/elec/results/results18.html#Nov6 Resolution: The definition should read 6 are defeated and until one candidate receives over fifty per cent of the 7 votes cast on non-exhausted ballots, and (3) the candidate receiving over fifty per cent of the votes 8 cast on non-exhausted ballots is deemed to have been elected to such office.
    [Show full text]
  • Election Chartbook a Compendium of Slides on the 2016 Election
    Election Chartbook A compendium of slides on the 2016 election April 8, 2016 Producer: Christine Yan Contributions from: Alex Perry, Katharine Conlon, Justin C. Brown, Owen Minott, Ben Booker Director: Afzal Bari Table of Contents Chapter 1: Reference Slides and Election Indicators…...…….. 2 Chapter 2: Democratic Primary and Caucus Results…......…22 Chapter 3: Republican Primary and Caucus Results..………. 61 Chapter 4: Polling Numbers and Other Statistics…….……..100 Chapter 5: Campaign Finance and Super PACs……………….123 Chapter 6: Issues and Events Impacting the Election.……..133 Submit suggestions and feedback to [email protected] Chapter 1 Reference Slides and Election Indicators 2016 PRESIDENTIAL DELEGATE TRACKER Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump Maintain Lead in Delegate Counts Democratic Delegate Count Republican Delegate Count ■ Allocated Delegates ■ Allocated Delegates 2,383 Delegates Needed to Win the Democratic Nomination 1,237 Delegates Needed to Win the Republican Nomination 1,959 Delegates Remaining 882 Delegates Remaining Needs Total 2,472 494 Delegates Needs 635 Total 4,763 delegates delegates Delegates Trump Clinton Needs 720 delegates Cruz Needs 1,325 Needs delegates Sanders 1,094 delegates Kasich *Delegate count as of April 8, 2016 Sources: Associated Press, Delegate Tracker; Politico, Delegate Tracker. April 8, 2016 | Alexander Perry, Christine Yan 3 PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN ANNOUNCEMENT GUIDE 5 Republicans and Democrats are Still in the Presidential Race Democrat and Republican Candidates for the 2016 Presidential Election
    [Show full text]
  • Resolving Election Error: the Dynamic Assessment of Materiality
    William & Mary Law Review Volume 54 (2012-2013) Issue 1 Article 3 November 2012 Resolving Election Error: The Dynamic Assessment of Materiality Justin Levitt Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, and the Election Law Commons Repository Citation Justin Levitt, Resolving Election Error: The Dynamic Assessment of Materiality, 54 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 83 (2012), https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr/vol54/iss1/3 Copyright c 2012 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr RESOLVING ELECTION ERROR: THE DYNAMIC ASSESSMENT OF MATERIALITY JUSTIN LEVITT* ABSTRACT The ghosts of the 2000 presidential election will return in 2012. Photo-finish and error-laden elections recur in each cycle. When the margin of error exceeds the margin of victory, officials and courts must decide which, if any, errors to discount or excuse, knowing that the answer will likely determine the election’s winner. Yet despite widespread agreement on the likelihood of another national melt- down, neither courts nor scholars have developed consistent princi- ples for resolving the errors that cause the chaos. This Article advances such a principle, reflecting the underlying values of the electoral process. It argues that the resolution of an election error should turn on its materiality: whether the error is material to the eligibility of a voter or the determination of her ballot preference. In developing this argument, this Article offers the first trans- substantive review of materiality as a governing principle.
    [Show full text]
  • Do Voters Choose Better Politicians Than Political Parties? Evidence from a Natural Experiment in Italy
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Alfano, Maria Rosaria; Baraldi, Anna Laura; Papagni, Erasmo Working Paper Do Voters Choose Better Politicians than Political Parties? Evidence from a Natural Experiment in Italy Working Paper, No. 024.2020 Provided in Cooperation with: Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM) Suggested Citation: Alfano, Maria Rosaria; Baraldi, Anna Laura; Papagni, Erasmo (2020) : Do Voters Choose Better Politicians than Political Parties? Evidence from a Natural Experiment in Italy, Working Paper, No. 024.2020, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM), Milano This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/228800 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under
    [Show full text]
  • Right to Vote and Its Implementation Donald P
    Notre Dame Law Review Volume 39 | Issue 4 Article 1 6-1-1964 Right to Vote and Its Implementation Donald P. Kommers Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Donald P. Kommers, Right to Vote and Its Implementation, 39 Notre Dame L. Rev. 365 (1964). Available at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr/vol39/iss4/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by NDLScholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Notre Dame Law Review by an authorized administrator of NDLScholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NOTRE DAME PAWVEP VOL. XXXIX JUNE, 1964- No. 4 THE RIGHT TO VOTE AND ITS IMPLEMENTATION Donald P. Kommers* The quest for political equality has been a major theme of American history. Indeed, since 1789, the American political system has undergone steady progress toward increasing democratization.' Slavery was abolished in 1865. The right to vote is no longer limited by restrictions based on property, race, color, or sex. Since 1913 United States senators have been elected by the people. Political equality is afforded to the citizens of each state through the equal protection and due process clauses of the fourteenth amendment. And the operation of the electoral college, originally intended to house a political elite, has been so modified by the American party system as to render the presidency the most democratic political institution in the land. Indeed, presidential politics has brought us as close to majority rule as we can ever expect to get inan imperfect political world.
    [Show full text]