DOCSLIB.ORG

TR's Contemporaries and Historians Weigh In

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
TR's Contemporaries and Historians Weigh In Handout 6: TR’s Contemporaries and Historians Weigh In Directions: Find the headings that pertain to your role assignments. Evaluate the source of the information. These excerpts are taken from both primary and secondary sources and date from 1899 to 2012. Underline comments that support TR’s actions and policies in black and use a different color to underline comments that detract from TR’s accomplishments. These statements can be used in the debate with citations. TR Readings Cuba TR was acclaimed by the American Press as the foremost hero of the day. Certainly, he enthusiastically led the Rough Riders into battle and was an inspiration to his men. He was also among the first group of Americans to reach the summit of Kettle Hill. To many newsmen TR was the man who had led the charge that had broken the Spanish defensive line and ensured victory. … TR was presented as the model American citizen who had chosen to fight as a soldier for his country. … The image was forever etched in public memory by Frederic Remington’s celebrated painting entitled The Charge of the Rough Riders at San Juan Hill, 1898 that showed TR leading the charge. TR was certainly brave and inspirational, but the fighting was so confused that it cannot be ascertained with any certainty exactly which officer led the charge. There is no doubt, however that TR stormed Kettle Hill and not the more formidable San Juan, a fact that both he and his admirers conveniently neglected to emphasize. Joseph Smith, “Spanish American War Hero,” in Blackwell’s Companion to American History: Companion to Theodore Roosevelt, 2011 (47). The Rough Riders were the first volunteer regiment organized, armed, and equipped. They were the first volunteer soldiers to land in Cuba. They raised the first flag flown by the military forces of the United States on foreign soil since the Mexican War. They were the first regiment of the army to fire a shot at the Spaniards, and the first man killed was one of them. Indeed, they bore the brunt of the first battle, and they bore it with unexampled bravery. In the second battle, their colonel (Theodore Roosevelt) and his men led the van and headed one of the most desperate charges in the history of warfare. From the first to last they were always in the lead, and always a credit to themselves and to their country. … My own connection with the regiment began the day after they landed in Cuba (where I had gone as a war correspondent for the New York Journal), and lasted just twenty-four hours. It was then quickly put a stop to by a Mauser bullet. Not more than six weeks ago Colonel, now Governor, Theodore Roosevelt sent me the medal of the regiment, and was good enough to say that he was glad to consider me a member of it. pbs.org/the-roosevelts Edward Marshall, The Story of the Rough Riders 1st U.S. Volunteer Cavalry, New York: G. W. Dillingham Co., 1899 (xxi-xxii). The Philippines Emilio Aguinaldo* “Proclamation to the Philippine People,” February 5, 1899 … In my manifest of January 8 last I published the grievances suffered by the Philippine forces at the hands of the [American] army of occupation [after the end of the Spanish-American War]. The constant outrages and taunts, which have caused the misery of the people of Manila, and, finally the useless conferences and the contempt shown the Philippine government prove the premeditated transgression of justice and liberty. … I have tried to avoid, as far as it has been possible for me to do so, armed conflict, in my endeavors to assure our independence by pacific means to avoid more costly sacrifices. But all my efforts have been useless against the measureless pride of the American Government and of its representatives in these islands, who have treated me as a rebel because I defend the sacred interests of my country and do not make myself an instrument of their dastardly intentions. *Aguinaldo led forces against the Spanish, and then against the occupying forces of the United States in the Philippine-American War (1899-1901). From The Columbia Documentary History of Race and Ethnicity in America, edited by Ronald H. Bayor, Columbia University Press, 2003 (accessed as an ebook). Philippine Independence … Although Roosevelt’s philosophy was rather ordinary in a transatlantic context, it was extraordinary among Americans. At first wishing to retain the Philippines for several generations at a minimum, President Roosevelt ended up preparing the islands for independence. He created in 1907 a Philippine assembly that shared decision making between American appointees and elected Filipinos, and he left office favoring the relinquishment of the islands within a single generation. Stephen Wertheim, “Reluctant Liberator: Theodore Roosevelt’s Philosophy of Self-Government and Preparation for Philippine Independence,” in Presidential Studies Quarterly, Columbia University, 2009. http://www.columbia.edu/~saw2156/ReluctantLiberator.pdf The young jingo [Theodore Roosevelt] is to blame for the present embarrassing possession of the Philippine Islands by the United States. He and Henry Cabot Lodge cooked up the attack on Manila pbs.org/the-roosevelts before hostilities in 1898 had begun. The order which eventually sent Dewey to the Philippines was issued by the Assistant Secretary of the Navy Roosevelt one day after Secretary Long had gone home to sleep—and Long never quite dared countermand it. It would make him look like a fool! But at the time it was issued McKinley had not given a thought to the Philippines [then owned by Spain] and most Americans didn’t know of their existence. John Chamberlain, “The Progressive Mind in Action,” 1932, in The American Past Volume II: Conflicting Interpretations of the Great Issues, edited by Sidney Fine and Gerald Brown, 1970. Treaty of Portsmouth Theodore, like his cousin Franklin, enjoyed world politics. His mediation in the Russo-Japanese War, undertaken on the suggestion of the Japanese and German emperors, is the best example. … The President negotiated directly with premiers and crowned heads, brought the two belligerents together, and broke the deadlock from which the Treaty of Portsmouth (5 September 1905) emerged. The wisdom of that treaty is now questionable. It probably saved Japan from a beating, but her government and press persuaded the Japanese people that Roosevelt’s “big stick” had done them out of vast territorial gains. And a few years later, in violation of the treaty, Japan annexed Korea [August 1910]. The treaty established Japan as overlord in Manchuria and enabled her to become the dominant naval power in the Pacific. Between 1941 and 1945 the United States paid heavily for the long-term results of Roosevelt’s meddling, for which, ironically enough, he was awarded the Nobel peace prize. Samuel Eliot Morison, The Oxford History of the American People, 1965 (832). TR’s mediation, one must conclude, perhaps wistfully, marked the last time a great international dispute proved susceptible to personal arrangement. His momentary success closed the diplomacy of the nineteenth century. ... And TR was not only mediating, but mediating as a powerful actor with a clear national interest in the sustaining or creating an Asian balance of power. … But Theodore Roosevelt succeeded, and thus his work of 1904 and 1905 takes on special interest for the historian. TR did not disclose his assertive role at Portsmouth to the Nobel crowds at Christiania in 1910. Nevertheless, the compromise of August 28, 1905, remained a great personal victory. The peace treaty … was the turning point. Without it, no peace would have ensued—good or bad. It was the cornerstone entitling TR to the Nobel Peace Prize. Eugene P. Trani and Donald E. Davis, “The End of an Era: Theodore Roosevelt and Treaty of Portsmouth,” in A Companion to Theodore Roosevelt, edited by Serge Ricard, 2011. Panama pbs.org/the-roosevelts Roosevelt’s critics have accused him of “fomenting” the revolution in Panama and have called it “an ineffaceable blot of dishonor” upon his administration. But to the end of his life he was emphatic in his insistence that “no one connected with his government had any part in preparing, inciting, or encouraging the late revolution on the Isthmus of Panama”; and in this he was supported by the leading men in his cabinet, John Hay and Elihu Root. ... Roosevelt did not instigate the revolution in Panama; when it was started he refused to allow Colombia to try to put it down. We had a treaty with Colombia, dating from 1846, which gave us the right to intervene in Panama to prevent disorders which might interfere with free transit across the Isthmus. And this right of intervention had been exercised many times in the half century previous to the Panama revolution. David Saville Muzzey, History of the American People, 1932 (543). Roosevelt’s high-handed policy (with Colombia) won general approval in the United States—after all, the President did get canal rights. What was more, the administration claimed to have acted legally, under a Colombian-American treaty of 1846, which gave the United States the right to intervene to protect the Isthmian transit route. But, in bullying Colombia, the United States won the animosity of many Latin Americans. United States businessmen found it difficult to get economic concessions. Finally, in 1921, the United States gave Colombia $25,000.000. Although the sum was not accompanied by apologies, it was plain that the United Sates was asking the Colombians to forget the Panama affair— and consider Americans for oil concessions. All this might have been avoided if Theodore Roosevelt had been less impulsive, or more generous, in 1903.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download Download
    INDIANA MAGAZINE OF HISTORY Volume XLVIII MARCH,1952 Number 1 The Theory of the History of an American Section and the Practice of R. Carlyle Buley Fulmer Mood* From time to time, and never at regular or predictable intervals, there will appear upon American bookstands some work from an historian's pen which by manifesting some spe- cial merit or combination of merits warrants the most careful, extended consideration. Such a work was the late Clarence W. Alvord's The Mississippi Valley in British Politics, and such a work is the one now under review, by Professor Buley, The Old Northwest: Pioneer Period, 1815-1840.l In dealing With works of the kind it is not enough to appraise and estimate them from the point of view of their content alone ; it becomes also necessary to treat them against their proper background in the field of historical scholarship, to show where they tie up with earlier valid trends and movements in American histori- cal writing, where and how they depart from these, and wherein they offer new points of view as well as new data and new techniques of presentation. When the present volumes are treated in such a perspective, it will then be seen that The Old Nodhwest: Pioneer Period is a work of scholarship that com- pels the attention of historians, and deserves their sharpest, most sympathetic scrutiny. The perspective in which Professor Buley's volumes re- quire to be studied is a perspective of almost three quarters of a century in length. If the condition of affairs that obtained about 1880 is taken into consideration, American historical writing appears to have been dominated by the generalist, 'the * F'ulmer Mood is professor of history at the University of Texas, Austin, Texas.
    [Show full text]
  • I^Igtorical ^Siisociation
    American i^igtorical ^siisociation SEVENTY-SECOND ANNUAL MEETING NEW YORK HEADQUARTERS: HOTEL STATLER DECEMBER 28, 29, 30 Bring this program with you Extra copies 25 cents Please be certain to visit the hook exhibits The Culture of Contemporary Canada Edited by JULIAN PARK, Professor of European History and International Relations at the University of Buffalo THESE 12 objective essays comprise a lively evaluation of the young culture of Canada. Closely and realistically examined are literature, art, music, the press, theater, education, science, philosophy, the social sci ences, literary scholarship, and French-Canadian culture. The authors, specialists in their fields, point out the efforts being made to improve and consolidate Canada's culture. 419 Pages. Illus. $5.75 The American Way By DEXTER PERKINS, John L. Senior Professor in American Civilization, Cornell University PAST and contemporary aspects of American political thinking are illuminated by these informal but informative essays. Professor Perkins examines the nature and contributions of four political groups—con servatives, liberals, radicals, and socialists, pointing out that the continu ance of healthy, active moderation in American politics depends on the presence of their ideas. 148 Pages. $2.75 A Short History of New Yorh State By DAVID M.ELLIS, James A. Frost, Harold C. Syrett, Harry J. Carman HERE in one readable volume is concise but complete coverage of New York's complicated history from 1609 to the present. In tracing the state's transformation from a predominantly agricultural land into a rich industrial empire, four distinguished historians have drawn a full pic ture of political, economic, social, and cultural developments, giving generous attention to the important period after 1865.
    [Show full text]
  • Gratz V. Bollinger Amicus Brief
    No. 02-516 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States _________ JENNIFER GRATZ, ET AL., Petitioners, v. LEE BOLLINGER, ET AL., Respondents. _________ On Writ of Certiorari to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan _________ BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE AMERICAN COUNCIL ON EDUCATION AND 53 OTHER HIGHER EDUCATION ORGANIZATIONS IN SUPPORT OF RESPONDENTS _________ SHELDON E. STEINBACH MARTIN MICHAELSON* Vice President and General Counsel ALEXANDER E. DREIER American Council on Education HOGAN & HARTSON L.L.P. One DuPont Circle 555 Thirteenth Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036 Washington, D.C. 20004 (202) 939-9300 (202) 637-5748 * Counsel of Record Counsel for Amici Curiae AMICI ON THIS BRIEF American Council on Education American Anthropological Association American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education American Association of Colleges of Nursing American Association of Collegiate Registrars and Admissions Officers American Association of Community Colleges American Association of State Colleges and Universities American Association of University Professors American Association of University Women American College Personnel Association American Dental Education Association Association of Academic Health Centers Association of American Law Schools Association of American Universities Association of Baccalaureate Social Work Program Directors, Inc. Association of Catholic Colleges and Universities Association of Chiropractic Colleges Association of Community College Trustees Association of Governing Boards of
    [Show full text]
  • STEVEN HAHN Personal Home Address: 420 East 80Th Street, Apt. 9B New York, New York 10075 (610) 716-3656 [email protected] Education
    1 STEVEN HAHN Personal Home Address: 420 East 80th Street, Apt. 9B New York, New York 10075 (610) 716-3656 [email protected] Education Ph.D., History, Yale University, 1979 M.Phil., History, Yale University, 1976 M.A., History, Yale University, 1975 B.A., University of Rochester, 1973 Employment Professor of History, New York University, July 2016-- Roy F. and Jeannette P. Nichols Professor in American History, University of Pennsylvania, July 2003–June 2016 Professor of History, Northwestern University, July 1998-June 2003 Professor of History, University of California, San Diego, July 1987-June 1998 Associate Professor of History, University of California, San Diego, July 1983-June 1987 Visiting Associate Editor, Freedmen and Southern Society Project, University of Maryland, 1983-84 Assistant Professor of History, University of California, San Diego, July 1981-June 1983 Assistant Professor of History, University of Delaware, September 1979- June 1981 Lecturer in Yale College, Spring 1976, Spring 1979 Academic Honors - Scholarship Rogers Distinguished Fellow in Nineteenth Century History, Huntington Library, San Marino CA, 2016-17 National Endowment for the Humanities Fellowship, 2012 Elected to the Pulitzer Prize Board, 2011-- Appointed Pitt Professor, University of Cambridge, 2011-12 (declined) Nathan I. Huggins Lecturer, Harvard University, 2007 Lawrence Stone Visiting Professorship, Princeton University, 2006 Pulitzer Prize in History, 2004, for A Nation under Our Feet Bancroft Prize in American History, 2004, for A Nation under Our Feet
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    Curriculum Vitae Wilfred M. McClay ADDRESSES Professional Address SunTrust Bank Chair of Excellence in Humanities University of Tennessee at Chattanooga Dept. 6256 615 McCallie Avenue Chattanooga, TN 37403-2598 Phone: 423-425-5202, 5206 E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.utc.edu/Departments/suntrust/ Home Address: 904 Valewood Drive Signal Mountain, TN 37377 Phone: 423-517-0729 E-mail: [email protected] EDUCATION Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, Ph.D. in History, 1987. St. John's College, Annapolis, Maryland, B.A. cum laude, 1974. UNIVERSITY APPOINTMENTS Fulbright Senior Lecturer in American History, University of Rome, January-May 2007. University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN, SunTrust Bank Chair of Excellence in Humanities and Professor of History, 1999---. Georgetown University, Washington, DC, Royden B. Davis Chair in Interdisciplinary Studies, 1998-99. Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana, Associate Professor of History, 1993-99; Assistant Professor of History, 1987-1993. University of Dallas, Irving, Texas, Assistant Professor of History, 1986-87. Towson State University, Towson, Maryland, Instructor in History, 1985-86. 1 RESEARCH INTERESTS The intellectual and cultural history of the United States, with particular attention to the social and political thought of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries; the history of American religious thought and institutions; and the theory and practice of biographical writing. WORKS IN PROGRESS An intellectual biography of the American sociologist David Riesman, under contract to Farrar, Straus & Giroux, with the manuscript to be completed in 2008; a collection of essays, arising out of a conference I organized in the fall of 2006, entitled The Burden of the Humanities, to be published by Eerdmans in 2008; and a volume of my own collected essays entitled Pieces of a Dream: Historical and Critical Essays, also to be published by Eerdmans.
    [Show full text]
  • SALLY E. HADDEN WMU History Department 4408 Friedmann Hall
    SALLY E. HADDEN WMU History Department 215 Edgemoor Avenue 4408 Friedmann Hall Kalamazoo MI 49001 Kalamazoo MI 49008-5334 (269) 599-9683 (269) 387-4187 [email protected] EDUCATION Ph.D. 1993 Harvard University (History) J.D. 1989 Harvard Law School M.A. 1985 Harvard University (History) B.A. 1984 University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (History, Political Science) CURRENT EMPLOYMENT Associate Professor of History, Western Michigan University BOOKS Traveling the Beaten Trail: Charles Tait’s Charges to Federal Grand Juries, 1822-1825, co-authored with Paul Pruitt and David Durham. (University of Alabama Press, 2013) Signposts: New Directions in Southern Legal History, co-edited with Patricia Minter. 17 essays, 480 pages (University of Georgia Press, 2013) A Companion to American Legal History, co-edited with Alfred Brophy. 28 essays, 560 pages (Wiley-Blackwell, 2013) Slave Patrols: Law and Violence in Virginia and the Carolinas (Harvard University Press, 2001) BOOK PROJECTS “Lawyers and Legal Cultures in Early American Cities: Boston, Philadelphia, and Charleston” “One Supreme Court: The Early History of the Supreme Court” (with Maeva Marcus, under contract with Cambridge University Press) PEER-REVIEWED BOOK CHAPTERS and JOURNAL ARTICLES “Married to the Law: Women in Legal Households of Eighteenth-century America.” In The Learned and Lived Law: Essays in Honor of Charles Donahue, edited by Elizabeth Kamali, Saskia Lettmaier, and Nikitas Hatzimihail (forthcoming, 2022). Hadden, 2 PEER-REVIEWED BOOK CHAPTERS and JOURNAL ARTICLES (continued) “Gun Laws in Early America: Ownership and Practical Usage by Whites and Blacks in the South.” In Jacob Charles, Joseph Blocher, and Darrell Miller, eds., The History of Firearms Regulation in America (forthcoming, 2022).
    [Show full text]
  • Viola Barnes, the Gender of History and the North Atlantic Mind John G
    Document généré le 29 sept. 2021 05:57 Acadiensis Viola Barnes, the Gender of History and the North Atlantic Mind John G. Reid Volume 33, numéro 1, autumn 2003 URI : https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/acad33_1art01 Aller au sommaire du numéro Éditeur(s) The Department of History at the University of New Brunswick ISSN 0044-5851 (imprimé) 1712-7432 (numérique) Découvrir la revue Citer cet article Reid, J. G. (2003). Viola Barnes, the Gender of History and the North Atlantic Mind. Acadiensis, 33(1), 3–20. All rights reserved © Department of History at the University of New Ce document est protégé par la loi sur le droit d’auteur. L’utilisation des Brunswick, 2003 services d’Érudit (y compris la reproduction) est assujettie à sa politique d’utilisation que vous pouvez consulter en ligne. https://apropos.erudit.org/fr/usagers/politique-dutilisation/ Cet article est diffusé et préservé par Érudit. Érudit est un consortium interuniversitaire sans but lucratif composé de l’Université de Montréal, l’Université Laval et l’Université du Québec à Montréal. Il a pour mission la promotion et la valorisation de la recherche. https://www.erudit.org/fr/ 10609-02 Reid 2/6/04 10:33 AM Page 3 JOHN G. REID Viola Barnes, the Gender of History and the North Atlantic Mind VIOLA FLORENCE BARNES VISITED THE Maritime Provinces only once. Retired for 16 years from the History Department of Mount Holyoke College (in South Hadley, Massachusetts), she toured Quebec and the Maritimes in the fall of 1968 with her friend and life partner Mildred Howard.1 Barnes was not unduly impressed by what she saw.
    [Show full text]
  • (76) Talking About Foundation Grants to UW
    Introduction to Russell Sage Foundation. Report of the Princeton Conference. NY: Russell Sage Foundation, 1956. Draft submitted in 2006 to Philanthropy Classics Access Project, Harvard University Frank Emerson Andrews, the author of the Report of the Princeton Conference on the History of Philanthropy in the United States, described the conference as a “stray thread”—an incident in his life that was “related to philanthropy but not a part of the main stream.”1 Perhaps he was too close to the event to see the larger scenario that unfolded. My purpose is to draw together the threads of this gathering and those that hang loosely from it—to look briefly at its roots, its direct products and, perhaps most importantly, its place in a brief but vigorous interlude of research in the field we now call philanthropic studies. The most important characters in the story are the Russell Sage Foundation, the Ford Foundation, F. Emerson Andrews, and Merle Curti. If there was a single trigger for this wave of interest in studying philanthropy, it was the climate for foundations created by the Cox and Reese Commissions between 1952 and 1955. Edward E. Cox, Representative from Georgia, formed the Commission on Foundations and Private Philanthropy in 1952 to investigate allegations that charitable foundations were pushing a socialist agenda. The Commission looked for actual funding of communist causes but also looked more broadly for abuse of tax-exempt status. Other than a few questionable grants, Cox uncovered no crimes, conspiracies, or even concerns. One member of the Commission—B. Carroll Reese, Representative from Tennessee— was not convinced of the findings and was able to have the hearings reopened in 1954.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 OAH Annual Report
    Organization of American Historians 2013 Annual Report 2013 Annual Report of the Organization of American Historians ® Copyright (c) 2013 Organization of American Historians. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise without prior written permission of the Organization of American Historians, 112 North Bryan Avenue, Bloomington IN 47408. Telephone (812) 855-7311. http://www.oah.org First edition December 10, 2013. 2 2013 Annual Report Organization of American Historians 2013 Annual Report Table of Contents A Message from the OAH President .................................................................. 5 From the OAH Executive Director .....................................................................9 From the OAH Executive Editor .......................................................................11 Report of the OAH Treasurer ............................................................................13 Audited Financial Statements ............................................................................14 Membership ......................................................................................................... 19 Meetings and Conferences .................................................................................21 National Park Service Collaborative Project ................................................... 23 Distinguished Lectureship Program .................................................................25
    [Show full text]
  • Who Will Tell Our Story? How Anti-Federlists Won Their Place in History Textbooks an Honors Thesis Submitted to the Faculty Of
    WHO WILL TELL OUR STORY? HOW ANTI-FEDERLISTS WON THEIR PLACE IN HISTORY TEXTBOOKS AN HONORS THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY BY KIRK MARKLEY NEW BRUNSWICK, NEW JERSEY APRIL 2010 Markley 2 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................3 Chapter 1: 1820-1860 ................................................................................................................ 10 Chapter 2: 1860-1885 ................................................................................................................ 24 Chapter 3: 1885-1920 ................................................................................................................ 37 Chapter 4: 1920-1965 ................................................................................................................ 49 Chapter 5: 1965-2010 ................................................................................................................ 58 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................ 67 Bibliography ............................................................................................................................. 71 Markley 3 Introduction After the Texas Board of Education proposed a revised social studies curriculum that could affect history textbooks nationwide, Texas board member
    [Show full text]
  • Associate Professor
    SETH EDWARD ROCKMAN Brown University, Box N Providence, RI 02912 (401)-863-2819 [email protected] EMPLOYMENT 2009- Associate Professor (tenured), Department of History, Brown University 2004-2009 Assistant Professor, Department of History, Brown University 2002-2003 Visiting Assistant Professor, Department of History, Brown University 1999-2004 Assistant Professor, Department of History, Occidental College EDUCATION Ph.D., History, University of California at Davis, 1999 United States History (major field) and Cross-Cultural Women’s History (minor field) Dissertation: “Working for Wages in Early Republic Baltimore: Unskilled Labor and the Blurring of Slavery and Freedom” Alan Taylor (director), Karen Halttunen, Clarence Walker B.A., Columbia College, Columbia University, New York, NY, 1993 History, magna cum laude, Phi Beta Kappa Edwin Robbins Summer Research Fellowship and Chanler Prize, Department of History RESEARCH GRANTS AND FELLOWSHIPS American Council of Learned Societies Charles A. Ryskamp Fellowship, 2009 (held 2010-11) Gilder Lehrman Center for the Study of Slavery, Resistance, and Abolition, Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Yale University, October 2007 Institute for Southern Studies Visiting Fellow, University of South Carolina, Fall 2007 NEH Long-term Fellow, American Antiquarian Society, Worcester, Mass., Spring 2007 PEAES Year-Long Postdoctoral Fellow, Library Company of Philadelphia, 2001-2002 Gilder Lehrman Fellowship, New-York Historical Society, June 2001 University of California Reed-Smith Dissertation Year Fellowship, 1998-1999 University of California President’s Pre-doctoral Fellowship, 1993-1997 BOOKS Scraping By: Wage Labor, Slavery, and Survival in Early Baltimore Johns Hopkins University Press, 2009 Merle Curti Prize, Organization of American Historians Philip Taft Labor History Book Award H.L. Mitchell Prize, Southern Historical Association Subject of 2009 “Scraping By” Conference at Library Company of Philadelphia Welfare Reform in the Early Republic: A Brief History with Documents Bedford/St.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Anthropology
    SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH COUNCIL ITEMS VOLUME 16 " NUMBER 3 ■ SEPTEMBER 1962 230 PARK AVENUE " NEW YORK 17, N. Y. ON STUDYING THE HISTORY OF ANTHROPOLOGY Dell H. Hymes * On April 13-14 of this year a Conference on the History We can be partly gratified by the attention—by being of Anthropology was held in the office of the Social Sci- singled out for study by historians of science. It must ence Research Council. The attendants numbered 33 prove that our claims to be something of a science are and included anthropologists, historians, historians of being given credence. Yet it means some discomfort too, science, sociologists, and a few other interested persons. for we have our own accounts of our origin, nature, and Papers prepared for the conference were discussed. In destiny. It may seem atfirst that the historians of science this brief paper I should like to tell you about the confer- visit us simply out of sincere interest in these traditions ence, not so much in terms of its content as in terms of its of ours, to be edified by them, as we have been, and to import. This lies mainly, I think, not in the intrinsic record them for the rest of the world and posterity, lest value of what occurred—like most short conferences on they be lost. Eventually, however, we may discover that areas new to organized research, it was intense, varied, our attentive visitors do not always take our accounts at and confused—but in the fact that it did occur. The oc- face value.
    [Show full text]