DOCSLIB.ORG

Dissertation for Final Submission

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dissertation for Final Submission China and the United States in Civil-Commercial Air and Space: Specialist cultures and international relations in high-technology sectors by Alanna Krolikowski A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Political Science University of Toronto © Copyright by Alanna Krolikowski 2013 China and the United States in Civil-Commercial Air and Space: Specialist cultures and international relations in high-technology sectors Alanna Krolikowski Doctor of Philosophy Department of Political Science University of Toronto 2013 Abstract Why are some high-technology sectors trans-nationally integrated while others are sites of interstate competition? This dissertation explores this question through a comparison of China- U.S. relations in two strategic, high-technology sectors: civil-commercial aircraft manufacture and civil-commercial spacecraft manufacture. Between 1989 and 2009, China-U.S. relations took strikingly different trajectories in these two sectors. In the aircraft sector, the two countries’ industries traded and integrated their activities and their civil agencies cooperated. By contrast, in the space sector, their industries did not trade or integrate, their civil agencies did not cooperate, and the two countries engaged in a form of technological competition. The divergent trajectories taken by China-United States relations in these two sectors are puzzling because both sectors present similar incentives and disincentives for both transnational integration and interstate competition. Theories of international relations do not fully explain this sectoral variation. This research indicates that this variation is traceable to underlying differences in how specialists in each sector, including technical and policy experts, implicitly reason about and represent technologies in general. In both countries, the air and space specialist communities each hold distinct understandings of the relationship between humans and technology. ii Performing representational practices that reflect these distinct assumptions, aeronautic and space specialists discursively constitute each sector and its technologies as distinct objects of policy, requiring different forms of state action. In air, these include policies adopted by both countries to enhance bilateral trade, industrial partnership, and technical cooperation. In space, these include measures to inhibit bilateral trade and cooperation while preparing for a coming bilateral confrontation. iii Acknowledgements This dissertation would not have been possible without the help of many individuals. I was fortunate to have a supportive committee, whose guidance and patience enabled me to complete this project. Their help took too many forms to list. I thank my co-supervisor Professor Joseph Wong for, among countless other things, years of mentorship and support, careful reading of many drafts, sound advice, and an introduction to the world of professional academia. I thank my co-supervisor Professor Emanuel Adler for, among so much else, years of intellectual inspiration, careful reading of many texts, and incomparably helpful and detailed feedback that was essential to my progress. I am grateful to Professor Louis Pauly for, in particular, reading several drafts, providing valuable comments, and years of patient support to my efforts. Two outside readers of this dissertation helped it immeasurably. I thank Professor Victor Falkenheim for years of learning, for embodying the ideals that I cherish in a scholar, for patiently reading many of my texts, and for posing challenging questions. I am grateful to Professor Gregory Chin for his careful reading of the final draft, rapid and detailed feedback, and illuminating suggestions for how to take this work forward. The Department of Political Science at the University of Toronto was a great home base throughout my graduate studies. Professor Steven Bernstein enabled me to defend and move forward. Carolynn Branton and Joan Kallis looked out for me and created a positive atmosphere. This project benefitted from support from the Asian Institute and the Department of Political Science at the University of Toronto, the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, the Fulbright Foundation, the Chiang-Ching Kuo Foundation, the Ontario Graduate Scholarship, the Inter-University Program at Tsinghua University, and other institutions. iv I am indebted to interviewees in China, the United States, and beyond who agreed to participate in this project. Their willingness to share their views, experiences, and precious time with me made this dissertation possible. Scholars and supporters in China helped tremendously with this research. I am grateful to Professor Li Shaojun of the Institute of World Economics and Politics at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences for his advice and mentorship during my time as a visiting scholar under his care. I thank Xi Yanbin and her colleagues for assistance and support during this period. Friends and supporters at the Canada-China Business Council and diplomatic missions in Beijing helped with this phase. I thank in particular Ambassador David Mulroney, Allen Chong, and Patrice Cousineau of the Canadian Embassy and Colonel Phillip Lanman of the U.S. Embassy. I owe immense debts to many patient Chinese-language teachers. I recall with gratitude the year that I spent as a Fulbright doctoral student at the George Washington University in Washington, DC. My advisor, Professor Scott Pace, made my time at the Space Policy Institute rewarding, created research opportunities, and often changed my mind. I thank Professor John Logsdon for fascinating conversations over great dinners and the opportunity to attend one of the last launches of the Space Shuttle. I am profoundly indebted to Professor David Shambaugh, whose advice in Beijing and Washington was invaluable and whose commitment to academic reciprocity and freedom is inspiring. I thank Chirag Parik for listening to my thesis with an open mind and sharing his unmatched expertise and insight. This project benefitted from the support and insights of too many other experts to name. In particular, I thank Gregory Kulacki and David Wright of the Union of Concerned Scientists for unique learning opportunities, support, and sharing their expertise and network. I am grateful to Professor Gary Bertsch for helping my research in critical ways. I thank Elliot Holokauahi Pulham, Steve Eisenhart, and Brendan Curry of the Space Foundation for the excitement and v inspiration I felt at three National Space Symposia and while joining them on an unforgettable trip to China. I am grateful to Professor Tai Ming Cheung of the University of California at San Diego for the invaluable opportunity to attend the summer program on defense technology and join his research community. I will be forever grateful to many friends who made the PhD process rewarding and enjoyable. Their camaraderie made all the difference. In particular, I thank my 姐姐, Sarah Eaton, for inspiration, patient reading, and guidance, Genia Kostka for her careful reading, listening, and encouragement, Juliette Genevaz for being a terrific flatmate and friend, Seth Jaffe for his wit, insight into my texts, and great conversations, Kimberly Carter and Cliff van der Linden for our shared experience of the core courses and so much else, Bill Flanik for his patient ear and humour, Debra Thompson for advice, cheer, and inspiration, Christine Ho for being a terrific flatmate and appreciating Deng-era aesthetics, Kate Becker for great company in DC and at conferences in far-flung places, Luc Turgeon, Jenn Wallner, and Steve White for being ideal role models, Giuditta Mortola and Julia Dow for our salutary romps around Italy, Marie McDonough for being a great listener and especially so during the rough patches, and Mark Purdon for great company and conversations in the final months. I thank Tim Barrett for his invaluable support and careful reading of drafts during the early stages of this project. I am grateful to Wang Ting and Zhou Yi for their insights. Most importantly, I am grateful to my family for sticking by me during the dissertation process. In particular, I thank Viera Krolikowska for her years of optimism and patience, support for all my choices, and enthusiastic anticipation of this project’s end. vi Note on Translation With the exception of certain titles of articles and books, all translations herein are the author’s own, unless otherwise indicated. Readers may notice that the translations to English often do not read smoothly. This reflects deliberate choices about the translation and exposition of the material. I performed the analysis of the Chinese-language discourses for this research on the Chinese-language originals, rather than on their translations to English. In order to give readers of this text who do not read Chinese characters a window into this process, I aimed to provide translations that conveyed the original terms, including specific words, as directly and literally as possible. This approach came at the expense of conveying the larger meaning of the Chinese-language passages in a more natural-sounding English. vii Contents Part I: Question, theory, and methods Chapter 1: Research question Chapter 2: Theoretical framework Chapter 3: Research design and methods Part II: Air Chapter 4: The politics of bilateral trade, industrial integration, and cooperation in space Chapter 5: The prospects for bilateral relations in air Chapter 6:
Load more

Recommended publications
  • US National Security and Military/Commercial
    COMMERCIAL SPACE INSURANCE VOLUME II: Chapter 8/Summary he space insurance aspect of the Intelsat 708 launch failure focuses on the exchange of controlled technical information within the insurance community. Insurance underwriters and reinsurers for the Apstar 1A satellite program — the next scheduled T satellite to be launched on the Long March 3B after the Intelsat 708 failure — were concerned about the reliability of the Long March rocket, and the fate of future launch insurance programs in the PRC. Immediately after the Intelsat 708 launch failure, space insurance under- writers for the Apstar 1A insurance program pressured the PRC to create an international and Independent Review Committee (IRC). These underwriters and reinsurers insisted on this arrangement to ensure that an adequate assessment of the risks of future Long March rocket launches was made. Representatives from J & H Marsh & McLennan, an international space insurance brokerage firm, were adamant about obtaining a report from the Independent Review Committee for the benefit of the reinsurers of the Apstar 1A satellite insurance program. Members of the space insurance community were invit- ed to attend a meeting on April 15 and 16, 1996, in the PRC. The purpose of the meet- ing was to build confidence in the Long March rocket, and to discuss the status of the Apstar 1A insurance program. The space insurance acquisition and underwriting process includes the dis- semination of technical information, the consideration of market conditions, capac- ity, and participants, and the involvement of insurance brokers, underwriters, and rein- surers. This chapter identifies several issues relating to procedures for the disclosure and handling of sensitive information by the insurance community.
    [Show full text]
  • OASD Satellite Engagement Communications Plan (Feb
    The University of Mississippi School of Law The National Center for Remote Sensing, Air, and Space Law Informational resources on the legal aspects of human activities using aerospace technologies USA-193: Selected Documents Compiled by P.J. Blount P.J. Blount, editor Joanne Irene Gabrynowicz, editor This page intentionally left blank. Disclaimer The information contained in this compilation represents information as of February 20, 2009. It does not constitute legal representation by the National Center for Remote Sensing, Air, and Space Law (Center), its faculty or staff. Before using any information in this publication, it is recommended that an attorney be consulted for specific legal advice. This publication is offered as a convenience to the Center's readership. The documents contained in this publication do not purport to be official copies. Some pages have sections blocked out. These blocked sections do not appear in the original documents. Blocked out sections contain information wholly unrelated to the space law materials intended to be compiled. The sections were blocked out by the Center's faculty and staff to facilitate focus on the relevant materials. i National Center for Remote Sensing, Air, and Space Law Founded in 1999, the National Center for Remote Sensing, Air, and Space Law is a reliable source for creating, gathering, and disseminating objective and timely remote sensing, space, and aviation legal research and materials. The Center serves the public good and the aerospace industry by addressing and conducting education and outreach activities related to the legal aspects of aerospace technologies to human activities. Faculty and Staff Prof. Joanne Irene Gabrynowicz, Director Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    VOLUME II: CONTENTS ALL-VOLUME OVERVIEW . .i CHAPTER 5 Satellite Launches in the PRC: Hughes CHAPTER SUMMARY . 2 OPTUS B2, APSTAR 2 LAUNCH FAILURES: PRC GAINS SENSITIVE KNOWLEDGE FROM HUGHES INVESTIGATIONS . 6 THE PROHIBITION AGAINST TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER IN FOREIGN LAUNCHES . 8 International Traffic in Arms Regulations and the U.S. Munitions List . 8 Department of Defense Monitoring Role . 9 OPTUS B2 . .10 The Optus B2 Licenses . 10 The Optus B2 Fails To Achieve Orbit . 12 Failure Investigation Teams . 14 Failure Investigation Begins . .14 Hughes’ Export Administrators Deal with the Licensing Question . 17 A ‘Political’ Business Solution . 21 The Optus B3: Hughes’ Efforts to Improve the Long March Continue . 36 APSTAR 2 . .40 The Apstar 2 License . 40 The Apstar 2 Failure . 40 Failure Investigation Teams . 42 Failure Investigation Schedule . 42 The Need for a License . .42 Commerce Department Conference . 46 Same Fairing Failure Identified by Hughes . 47 A ‘Political’ Business Solution, Again? . 48 The Commerce Department Approves Data Release to the PRC . 50 SELECT COMMITTEE OF THE UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Hughes Tries to Get the PRC to Accept Its Findings . .. 51 CIA Analyst Visits Hughes . .. 56 A ‘Consolidated Solution’ . 58 Final Failure Investigation Report Released to the PRC by the Commerce Department . 60 Implementing the ‘Consolidated Solution’ . 64 U.S. Government Actions Following the Apstar 2 Launch Failure . 66 Defense Department Assessments of Damage to National Security . 68 Damage to National Security from the Apstar 2 Failure Investigation . 69 Damage to National Security from the Sharing of Coupled Loads Analysis . 72 Damage to National Security from Providing the PRC with Information Concerning Deficiencies in the Fairing, and Resultant Improvements to PRC Rockets and Ballistic Missiles .
    [Show full text]
  • Vol II/Chap 6-S 5/21/99 12:01 PM Page 1
    Vol II/Chap 6-S 5/21/99 12:01 PM Page 1 SATELLITE LAUNCHES IN THE PRC: LORAL Vol II/Chap 6-S 5/21/99 12:01 PM Page 2 VOLUME II: Chapter 6/Summary n February 15, 1996, a Long March 3B rocket carrying the U.S.-built Intelsat 708 satellite crashed just after lift off from the Xichang launch center in the People’s Republic of China. This was the third launch failure in 38 months involving the PRC’s Long O March series of rockets carrying U.S.-built satellite payloads. It also was the first commercial launch using the new Long March 3B. These events attracted intense attention from the international space launch insurance industry, and eventually led to a review of the PRC launch failure investigation by Western aero- space engineers. The activities of the Western aerospace engineers who participated on the review team — the Independent Review Committee — sparked allegations of violations of U.S. export control regulations. The review team was accused of per- forming an unlicensed defense service for the PRC that resulted in the improvement of the reliability of the PRC’s military rockets and ballistic missiles. The Intelsat 708 satellite was manufactured by Space Systems/Loral (Loral) under contract to Intelsat, the world’s largest commercial satellite com- munications services provider. Loral is wholly owned by Loral Space & Communications, Ltd. China Great Wall Industry Corporation, the PRC state-controlled missile, rocket, and launch provider, began an investigation into the launch failure. On February 27, 1996, China Great Wall Industry Corporation reported its determination that the Long March 3B launch failure was caused by a broken wire in the inner frame of the inertial measurement unit within the guidance system of the rocket.
    [Show full text]
  • MIDDLE EAST, NORTH AFRICA UAE Expansion Into Space Yields Positive Earthly Results
    MIDDLE EAST, NORTH AFRICA UAE Expansion into Space Yields Positive Earthly Results OE Watch Commentary: The UAE has become the first Arab nation to join the race towards reaching Mars via its successful Mars probe launch and is already benefiting from this space exploration. As evident from local media in Japan, China and the UAE, kickstarting the Emirates’ space industry has enhanced mutual relations with China and will serve as an inspiration for future generations of Emirati youth to pursue “future sciences.” In July 2020, Japanese rockets helped carry the first UAE made H-IIA (Hope) probe orbiter mission to Mars. This successful rocket launch was done by a private engineering company, which has conducted other launches for various foreign countries over the years. As stated in The Japan Times, “the Emirati project is one of three racing to Mars, along with Tianwen-1 from China…, taking advantage of a period when the Earth and Mars are closest.” This is only the beginning for the UAE’s ambitious plans UAE Vice President, Mohammed Bin Rashid Al Maktoum. Source: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mohammed_Bin_Rashid_Al_Maktoum_at_the_World_Economic_Forum_Summit_on_the_Global_Agenda_2008_2.jpg CCA SA for space, as they also plan to send an unarmed 2.0 Generic spacecraft to the moon in 2024. According to the Global Times China, space exploration serves to expand scientific research and diversify the UAE’s economy, which remains heavily dependent upon oil exports. Joining the UAE’s space initiatives with China’s Tianwen-1 Mars project has expanded relations between the two nations. In August 2020, Global Times China reports that the UAE Ambassador to China stated that he sees “…great potential for cooperation … [ as they move] humanity to further levels of advancement.” This cooperation centers upon the Beijing-based China Academy of Space Technology (CAST) and the UAE space agency.
    [Show full text]
  • February 18, 2015 Dr. Joan Johnson-Freese Professor, Naval War College Testimony Before the U.S.-China Economic & Security R
    February 18, 2015 Dr. Joan Johnson-Freese Professor, Naval War College Testimony before the U.S.-China Economic & Security Review Commission “China’s Space & Counterspace Programs” The question before the Commission concerns how the United States (U.S.) can achieve stated U.S. goals regarding space security given a rapidly expanding and increasingly sophisticated Chinese space program.1 The importance of protecting the space environment and U.S. space assets in orbit, assets which provide information critical to the U.S. civilian and military sectors and overall U.S. national security, has required that goals be considered and reconsidered at many levels and within multiple communities of the U.S. government. Therefore, it is appropriate to begin by referencing the multiple and nested U.S. strategies related to or referencing space, specifically the 2010 National Security Strategy (NSS), the 2010 National Space Policy (NSP), the 2010 Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR) and the 2011 National Security Space Strategy (NSSS)2 for analytic parameters. Guidance in the NSS is simply stated. “To promote security and stability in space, we will pursue activities consistent with the inherent right of self-defense, deepen cooperation with allies and friends, and work with all nations toward the responsible and peaceful use of space.” (p. 31)3 These general ideas are reiterated in the NSP as “the United States considers the sustainability, stability, and free access to, and use of, space vital to its national interests.” (NSP p.3) With security, sustainability, free-access and stability as overall goals, the NSSS recognizes the importance of working with all space-faring nations due to the nature of the space environment stated as both contested, congested and competitive (NSS p.i) and “… a domain that no nation owns, but on which all rely,” (NSSS p.i).
    [Show full text]
  • Vol II/Notes.Cc 312-350/366-404
    VOLUME II: NOTES CHAPTER 5 – Satellite Launches in the PRC: Hughes 1 See a more detailed discussion of U.S. export controls and licensing requirements in the chapter entitled “U.S. Export Policy Toward the PRC.” 2 22 U.S.C. § 2778. 3 22 C.F.R., Part 120. 4 Recently, the Defense Technology Security Administration has been renamed the Technology Security Directorate and made a part of the new Defense Threat Reduction Agency. 5 Air Force Instruction 10-1210, ¶ 1.1.1. 6 Air Force Instruction 10-1210, ¶ 3.1. 7 Air Force Space Command Technology Safeguard Monitor Handbook, November 1997,11 4.13. No earlier version of this publication is available, although Defense Technology Security Administration monitor Lt. Col. Allen Coates advises that similar written directives were in effect at the times of the Hughes launch failures. 8 Hughes Space and Communications Company, Long March 2E/Optus B2 Failure Investigation Spacecraft Final Report, October 1993. 9 Ibid. 10 Ibid. 11 Ibid. 12 Ibid. 13 Deposition of Stephen Cunningham, December 2, 1998. 14 Hughes Long March 2E/Optus B2 Failure Investigation Spacecraft Final Report, October 1993. 15 Deposition of Stephen Cunningham, December 2, 1998. 16 Interview of Allen Coates, September 24, 1998. 17 Deposition of Allen Coates, November 20, 1998. 18 Deposition of Al Wittmann, November 6, 1998. 19 Ibid. 20 Ibid. 21 Deposition of Al Wittman, November 6, 1998. 22 Hughes Apstar2/LM-2E Independent Review Team Report, July 1995. 23 Deposition of Donald E. Leedle, October 29, 1998. 24 Ibid. 312 SELECT COMMITTEE OF THE UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 25 Ibid.
    [Show full text]
  • The 1960 Presidential Election in Florida: Did the Space Race and the National Prestige Issue Play an Important Role?
    UNF Digital Commons UNF Graduate Theses and Dissertations Student Scholarship 2000 The 1960 rP esidential Election in Florida: Did the Space Race and the National Prestige Issue Play an Important Role? Randy Wade Babish University of North Florida Suggested Citation Babish, Randy Wade, "The 1960 rP esidential Election in Florida: Did the Space Race and the National Prestige Issue Play an Important Role?" (2000). UNF Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 134. https://digitalcommons.unf.edu/etd/134 This Master's Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at UNF Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in UNF Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UNF Digital Commons. For more information, please contact Digital Projects. © 2000 All Rights Reserved THE 1960 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION IN FLORIDA: DID THE SPACE RACE AND THE NATIONAL PRESTIGE ISSUE PLAY AN IMPORTANT ROLE? by Randy Wade Babish A thesis submitted to the Department of History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History UNIVERSITY OF NORTH FLORIDA COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES December, 2000 Unpublished work © Randy Wade Babish The thesis of Randy Wade Babish is approved: (Date) Signature Deleted Signature Deleted Signature Deleted Signature Deleted Accepted for the College: Signature Deleted Signature Deleted eanofGfaduate rues ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Although my name appears on the title page and I assume full responsibility for the final product and its content, the quality of this work was greatly enhanced by the guidance of several individuals. First, the members of my thesis committee, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • VBI China DA 2K11
    VBI China DA 2k11 China DA China DA ................................................................................................................................................................ 1 China 1NC .............................................................................................................................................................. 2 China 1NC .............................................................................................................................................................. 3 Uniqueness—China Leads in Space ..................................................................................................................... 4 Uniqueness—China Leads in Space ..................................................................................................................... 5 Uniqueness—Chinese Heg Now ............................................................................................................................ 6 Uniqueness—Chinese Heg Now ............................................................................................................................ 7 Uniqueness—Chinese Heg Now ............................................................................................................................ 8 Uniqueness—Multipolarity Now ............................................................................................................................. 9 Brinks—Now Key Time .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Xxvi Xxvixxvixxvi
    XXXXVIXXXXVIVIVI XXVI XXVIXXVIXXVI XX XXXX XX 26 2626 26 XXXXVIII 201720192016 UDK 2+17 (066) (08) Re 515 Reliģiski-filozofisku rakstu speciālizdevums Dinamiskā Āzija (Dynamic Asia) sagatavots ar Latvijas Universitātes Akadēmiskās attīstības projekta AAP2019/38 un Japānas fonda (Japan Foundation) finansiālu atbalstu. Izdevums rekomendēts publicēšanai ar LU Filozofijas un socioloģijas institūta Zinātniskās padomes 2019. gada 3. aprīļa sēdes lēmumu. Galvenā redaktore: Solveiga Krūmiņa-Koņkova Atbildīgie redaktori par speciālizdevumu – Jānis Priede un Kaspars Kļaviņš Literārā redaktore: Andra Damberga Maketētāja: Andra Liepiņa Vāka dizaina autori: Kārlis Koņkovs, Matīss Kūlis Izdevumā izmantoti fotoattēli no rakstu autoru personiskajiem arhīviem. Zinātniskās redakcijas kolēģija Latvijas Universitāte: Dr. phil. Ella Buceniece; Dr. phil. Solveiga Krūmiņa-Koņkova; Dr. habil. phil. akadēmiķe, profesore Maija Kūle; Dr. hist. eccl. docents Andris Priede; Dr. habil. phil. Māra Rubene; Dr. hist. Inese Runce; Dr. phil. akadēmiķis, profesors Igors Šuvajevs Ārzemju locekļi: Ekaterina Anastasova, Ph.D., Associate Professor, Institute of Ethnology and Folklore Studies with the Ethnographic Museum at the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Bulgaria; Eileen Barker, Ph.D., OBE, FBA, Professor of Sociology with Special Reference to Study of Religion, The London School of Economics and Political Science, U.K.; Gloria Durka, Ph.D., Professor, Director, PhD. Program in Religious Education, Graduate School of Religion and Religious Education, Fordham University,
    [Show full text]
  • National Space Programmes 2014-2015
    National Space Programmes 2014-2015 Foreword Our programme for in-orbit demonstration (IOD) has reached a critical step with the launch of UKube-1 and I am delighted to TechDemoSat-1 spacecraft in July 2014. Further IOD introduce this third projects are now being planned. edition of our brochure which summarises Our long running science and exploration the activities and programmes in support of Cosmic Vision and Aurora achievements of the remain at full speed, with key milestones in 2014/15 UK’s national space including delivery of all UK instrument hardware for programmes. While the LISA Pathfinder; and the launch of the astrometry UK’s strong involvement mission GAIA which will rely on a data processing and in the projects of the analysis system financially supported by the UK Space European Space Agency and of the European Union Agency. A new round of our national technology attract most attention, the UK’s national space projects programme for exploration known as CREST has are no less important in delivering our six point civil awarded £2 million of funding and projects are now space strategy, shown in the accompanying graphic. underway. In 2014/15 we completed the majority of projects in We have doubled our funding for educational projects Phase 1 of the National Space Technology Programme to allow us to continue successful programmes such (NSTP) and with our partners in the Technology as ‘Space for All’, Mission X, and the National Space Strategy Board, a compendium of the ‘Space for Academy, while at the same time initiating an exciting Growth’ was issued.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Launch Vehicles: Government Activities, Commercial Competition, and Satellite Exports
    Order Code IB93062 CRS Issue Brief for Congress Received through the CRS Web Space Launch Vehicles: Government Activities, Commercial Competition, and Satellite Exports Updated March 22, 2002 Marcia S. Smith Resources, Science, and Industry Division Congressional Research Service The Library of Congress CONTENTS SUMMARY MOST RECENT DEVELOPMENTS BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS U.S. Launch Vehicle Policy From “Shuttle-Only” to “Mixed Fleet” Clinton Administration Policy U.S. Launch Vehicle Programs and Issues NASA’s Space Shuttle Program Future Launch Vehicle Development Programs DOD’s Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle (EELV) Program Government-Led Reusable Launch Vehicle (RLV) Programs Private Sector RLV Development Efforts U.S. Commercial Launch Services Industry Congressional Interest Foreign Competition (Including Satellite Export Issues) Europe China Russia Ukraine India Japan LEGISLATION IB93062 03-22-02 Space Launch Vehicles: Government Activities, Commercial Competition, and Satellite Exports SUMMARY Launching satellites into orbit, once the Since 1999, projections for launch services exclusive domain of the U.S. and Soviet gov- demand have decreased dramatically, however. ernments, today is an industry in which compa- At the same time, NASA’s main RLV nies in the United States, Europe, China, Rus- program, X-33, suffered delays. NASA termi- sia, Ukraine, Japan, and India compete. In the nated the program in March 2001. Companies United States, the National Aeronautics and developing new launch vehicles are reassessing Space Administration (NASA) continues to be their plans, and NASA has initiated a new responsible for launches of its space shuttle, and “Space Launch Initiative” (SLI) to broaden the the Air Force has responsibility for launches choices from which it can choose a new RLV associated with U.S.
    [Show full text]