DOCSLIB.ORG

2021 Capital Budget for Hantsport Fire Department and Fire Area Rate Levy for Hants Border Area

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2021 Capital Budget for Hantsport Fire Department and Fire Area Rate Levy for Hants Border Area 2021 Capital Budget for Hantsport Fire Department and Fire Area Rate Levy for Hants Border Area Scott MacKay, Manager of Revenue Municipal Council August 31, 2021 Recommendations • That Municipal Council approve the capital budget of the Hantsport Fire Department as submitted by the West Hants Regional Municipality for the 2021/2022 fiscal year. • That Municipal Council approve the levying, collection and remittance of the Fire Area Rate for the Hants Border area at a rate of $0.026 per $100 assessment, per Appendix B: Area Rates 2021-22 of the August 31, 2021 Request for Decision. 2 Capital Budget of Hantsport Fire Department • Submitted budget for 2021/22 • Kings County’s portion of the budget • Recovery of these costs 3 Hantsport Fire Department Capital Budget Capital Budget Fully Paid Amount HANTSPORT TRUCK #2 PRINCIPAL 2026/27 $25,000 HANTSPORT TRUCK #2 INTEREST $4,412 FIRE TRUCK #6 PRINCIPAL 2027/28 $17,500 FIRE TRUCK #6 INTEREST $4,051 BREATHING APPARATUS PRINCIPAL 2023/24 $16,500 BREATHING APPARATUS INTEREST $2,311 COMMAND SCENE LIGHTING PRINCIPAL 2031/32 $2,575 COMMAND SCENE LIGHTING INTEREST $116 MAXI FORCE AIRBAG SET PRINCIPAL 2036/37 $761 MAXI FORCE AIRBAG INTEREST $34 FIRE HALL STUDY PRINCIPAL 2022/23 $9,685 FIRE HALL STUDY INTEREST $436 TOTAL $83,381 Kings County portion of the budget Total Calls Calls to Kings County 3-Year Average 2018 175 58 2019 221 62 2020 178 53 TOTAL 574 173 30.14% 5 Fire Area Rate for 2021/22 • Public Engagement • Calculation of the Rate • Property Owner Impact 6 Fire Area Rate Calculation Total Capital Costs $83,381 Municipality of Kings Portion $25,131 Administration Fees $1,156 2021/22 Cost to Kings County $26,287 2021 Area Assessment $101,959,200 Recommended 2021 Fire Area Rate $0.026 (per $100 of assessment) EXAMPLE Property valued at …. $150,000 Divided by 100 $1,500 Multiplied by the area rate $0.026 Total Fire Area Rate paid by homeowner for 2021/22 $39.00 7 Other Fire Area Rates in Kings County 2021/22 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.065 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.0377 0.0425 0.04 0.0260 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.00 Hants Aylesford Aylesford Greenwich Halls Waterville Kingston Kentville New Minas Greenwich Berwick Canning Wolfville Border & (Inside) (outside) (outside) Harbour (outside) Area RATE 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.0377 0.0425 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.06 0.07 0.05 0.065 0.0260 8 Recommendations • That Municipal Council approve the capital budget of the Hantsport Fire Department as submitted by the West Hants Regional Municipality for the 2021/2022 fiscal year. • That Municipal Council approve the levying, collection and remittance of the Fire Area Rate for the Hants Border area at a rate of $0.026 per $100 assessment, per Appendix B: Area Rates 2021-22 of the August 31, 2021 Request for Decision. 9 Questions? 10 Capital Investment Plan and Canada Community-Building Fund Allocations Mike Livingstone, CPA Manager of Financial Reporting Special Council August 31, 2021 Intent • To present the five-year Capital Investment Plan (CIP) for the Municipality and its Villages, which is filed with the Province as a condition of funding from the Canada Community-Building Fund (CCBF). • To provide Council with information on the allocation and use of the CCBF among the Municipality and its Villages. 2 What’s in the CIP? • The five-year capital forecast of the Municipality • The five-year capital forecast of the seven Villages within the Municipality • Historical project expenditures, and • Financing sources for the forecasted projects, including notably, CCBF utilization. 3 CIP Summary Detail for 2021/22 • $13,450,023 of Municipal projects, consistent with the approved 2021/22 Capital Budget. • $5,609,073 of Village projects: New Minas $ 2,142,863 Canning 1,437,403 Kingston 1,189,000 Cornwallis Square 371,585 Port Williams 276,556 Greenwood 121,666 Aylesford 70,000 Total $ 5,609,073 Project specific detail, by Village, is available in the CIP 4 CIP Financing Sources • Both Municipal and Village projects are planned to be financed in a variety of ways and will include some combination of: • Operating revenue, • Operating or Capital Reserves, • Canada Community-Building Funds • Grants From Other Governments, • Debt, and • Other Sources (such as non-government contributions) • The next several slides will focus on CCBF, followed by more detailed Village project information. 5 History of CCBF (Formally Gas Tax) • The Municipality is unique in the way it utilizes the annual allotment of CCBF. • Effective April 1, 2013 the Municipality updated its Gas Tax Funding Guidelines by motion of Council. • Part of the 2013 funding guidelines was the decision to continue to allocate CCBF to Villages. • Despite the Village allocations, the CCBF program views the Municipality as the sole entity responsible for these funds and adherence to the funding agreement. 6 History of CCBF cont. • The Municipality and four Villages with owned water and sewer infrastructure share CCBF proportional to the value of that infrastructure. • Three Villages without owned infrastructure request CCBF from the Municipality’s share for their capital projects. • The April 1, 2013 Gas Tax Funding Guidelines are still followed today. Allocated Villages Non-Allocated Villages Canning Aylesford Kingston Cornwallis Square New Minas Greenwood Port Williams 7 2021/22 CCBF Allocation • The table below details the 2021/22 forecasted CCBF continuity for the Municipality and Villages: Opening 2021/22 Forecast Closing Municipality / Village Balance Allocation Utilization Balance Municipality of the County of Kings $ 1,405,840 $ 3,509,868 $ (656,500) $ 4,259,208 Cornwallis Square 4,937 - (4,937) - Aylesford 46,666 - (46,666) - Greenwood - - - - Canning 777,549 113,419 (292,513) 598,455 Kingston 739,060 187,454 (145,000) 781,514 New Minas 1,627,022 378,794 (1,710,074) 295,742 Port Williams 535,086 179,724 (248,222) 466,588 Total $ 5,136,160 $ 4,369,259 $ (3,103,912) $ 6,401,507 8 Projects and CCBF Utilization 21/22 New Minas 31 Projects • Woodvale Water Tank Refurb. $ 1,466,250 • Household Meter Reader Boxes $ 72,000 • Golfview Park Upgrades $ 60,000 (40,000) • Meadow Terrace Park Upgrades $ 60,000 (40,000) These 4 projects make up 77% of the total spend and 95% of CCBF projects. 9 Projects and CCBF Utilization 21/22 Canning 2 Projects - carryover • Chapel Rd. Sidewalk $ 651,857 (132,888) • Chapel Rd. Water Line $ 785,546 (159,625) These 2 projects make up 100% of the total spend and 100% of CCBF projects. Two future projects total an additional $943,894. 10 Projects and CCBF Utilization 21/22 Kingston 11 Projects • Public Works Garage $ 450,000 • Maple St. Sidewalk Widen $ 230,000 (145,000) • Tractor Replacement $ 155,000 These 3 projects make up 70% of the total spend and 100% of CCBF projects. $1,000,000 (666,667) is budgeted in 2022/23 for Main St. Sidewalk. 11 Projects and CCBF Utilization 21/22 Cornwallis Square 5 Projects • Water Holding Tank $ 307,285 • Breathing Apparatus (fire) $ 48,000 • Rest Area (HMT) $ 7,500 (4,937) These 3 projects make up 98% of the total spend and 100% of CCBF projects. In 2024/25 $1,500,000 has been budgeted for a Fire Truck. 12 Projects and CCBF Utilization 21/22 Port Williams 3 Projects • Sewer Lagoon Rehab. $ 211,556 (211,556) • PW Park Splashpad $ 25,000 (13,333) • Collins Rd. Sidewalk $ 40,000 (23,333) These 3 projects make up 100% of the total spend and 100% of CCBF projects. Further $800,000 (533,333) is budgeted in 2022/23 for Collins Rd. Sidewalk. 13 Projects and CCBF Utilization 21/22 Greenwood 6 Projects • Oil Tank Replacement $ 82,866 • Playground Retrofitting $ 21,000 These 2 projects make up 85% of the total spend and there is no CCBF utilization. The Rocknotch Rd. sidewalk project of $190,000 (126,667) was approved in the 2020/21 CIP and will be carried over to 2022/23. 14 Projects and CCBF Utilization 21/22 Aylesford 1 Project - carryover • Pine Ave. Sidewalk $ 70,000 (46,666) This project makes up 100% of the total spend and 100% of CCBF projects. Three other sidewalk projects are budgeted over 2022/23 – 2024/25 for a total of $745,000 (496,666). 15 Recommendations 1. That Municipal Council approve the 2021/22 CCBF allocations and CCBF use for Village projects, as included in Appendix A attached to the August 31, 2021 Request for Decision report. 2. That Municipal Council approve the 2021/22 Five- Year Capital Investment Plan, as included in Appendix A attached to the August 31, 2021 Request for Decision report. 16.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pdf Fire Services Final Report (1.74
    To: Kelliann Dean, Deputy Minister, Department of Municipal Affairs Deputy Mayor Laurie Murley, President, UNSM Marie Walsh, President, AMANS Rod Nielsen President, Fire Services Association From: Fire Services Study Steering Committee Date: August 3, 2017 Re: Municipal Review of Fire Services in Nova Scotia As you are aware, the Union of Nova Scotia Municipalities and the Association of Municipal Administrators of Nova Scotia, with the financial support of the Province of Nova Scotia, engaged a consultant to facilitate a frank and open discussion on fire services. The consultant was asked to meet with representative stakeholders to ascertain and prioritize key issues at the local level, to consider opportunities to address these issues, and to facilitate the sharing of best practices, lessons learned and possible areas for collaboration. The work of the consultant was overseen by a Project Steering Committee comprised of representatives from UNSM, AMANS, the Fire Services Association and the Fire Marshal’s Office. The task of the Project Steering Committee was to select the consultant, to ensure the terms of reference were met and to facilitate the work of the consultant. Pomax Consulting was engaged to undertake the review. Their report is attached in Appendix B. Project Steering Committee Observations The Consultant has fulfilled the terms of reference. The Project Steering Committee recognizes the hard work of the consultant in documenting stakeholders’ views and concerns. The recommendations of the consultant make sense, in that the issues are complex and not solved by one group alone. The need to work together is paramount. During the stakeholder consultations, it became evident that there were varying degrees of understanding with respect to fire services in Nova Scotia, particularly around authority and areas of responsibility.
    [Show full text]
  • Options for Accessibility Advisory Committee
    Municipality of the County of Kings Request for Decision TO Council PREPARED BY Gordon Roussel, Policy Analyst MEETING DATE October 6, 2020 SUBJECT Options for Accessibility Advisory Committee ORIGIN • Nova Scotia Accessibility Act, Chp 2, RSNS 2017 requires that all municipalities form an Accessibility Advisory Committee and complete an accessibility plan no later than April 1, 2021. • October 16, 2019 Village-Municipal Meeting Presentation ‘Accessibility Planning for Municipalities’. RECOMMENDATION That Municipal Council approve entering into discussions with the seven Villages located in Kings County regarding the formation of a Joint Accessibility Advisory Committee consisting of: i. one member of Council who is also a member of the Kings Transit Authority Board of Directors, ii. one Commissioner from each of the seven Villages, and iii. eight members of the public who either have a disability or represent an organization that represents people with disabilities. At a minimum, that would include one member of the public who has a disability from each of the Western, Central, and Eastern areas of the Municipality, as shown on the map in Schedule A of the Planning Advisory Committee Policy (PLAN-09-003). Should no applications for citizen members be received from one of the three areas, an applicant from another part of the Municipality may be appointed to represent that area. INTENT To form an Accessibility Advisory Committee (AAC) and prepare an Accessibility Plan as required by the Province of Nova Scotia Accessibility Act by April 1, 2021 or such later date as may be set by the Nova Scotia Accessibility Directorate as a result of the Provincial State of Emergency declared on March 22, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • COMMITTEE of the WHOLE November 17, 2020 9:00 Am AGENDA Audio Recording Times Noted in Red (Minutes:Seconds)
    THE MUNICIPALITY OF THE COUNTY OF KINGS COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE November 17, 2020 9:00 am AGENDA Audio Recording Times Noted in Red (Minutes:Seconds) 1. Roll Call 00:00 2. Approval of Agenda 01:40 Page 1 3. Disclosure of Conflict of Interest Issues 02:14 4. Approval of Minutes a. September 15, 2020 03:49 Page 2 5. Business Arising from Minutes a. September 15, 2020 None Page 2 6. Administration a. Proposed Repeal of Policy PRO-10-002: Fire Grants 04:50 Page 10 b. Proposed Amendments to Policy FIN-05-020: Hospitality 12:43 Page 17 c. Municipal Branding/Visual Identity Briefing 17:30 Page 31 7. Engineering & Public Works, Lands and Parks Services a. FY2021-2022 Priority List Provincial/Subdivision Road Resurfacing Program 26:27 Page 34 b. Award of Contract 20-24: New EPW Operations Centre 73:15 Page 48 8. Correspondence 102:09 a. 2020-10-30 Soldiers Memorial Hospital Foundation Thank You 102:27 Page 56 b. 2020-11-02 Nova Scotia Health Information 102:43 Page 57 c. 2020-11-03 Commissionaires re: Remembrance Day 102:58 Page 59 d. 2020-11-03 Grand View Manor Thank You 103:09 Page 60 e. 2020-11-05 Village of New Minas re: Thunder in the Valley 103:23 Page 61 f. 2020-11-06 Village of New Minas re: Thunder in the Valley Mayor’s Response 104:24 Page 62 g. 2020-11-05 Gaspereau Valley Elementary School Thank You 104:35 Page 64 h. 2020-11-06 Village of Kingston Response to J-Class Road Funding 105:08 Page 65 i.
    [Show full text]
  • Approval of Agenda 03:52 Page 1 3
    THE MUNICIPALITY OF THE COUNTY OF KINGS MUNICIPAL COUNCIL August 18, 2020 9:00 am AGENDA Audio Recording Times Noted in Red (Minutes:Seconds) 1. Roll Call 00:00 2. Approval of Agenda 03:52 Page 1 3. Disclosure of Conflict of Interest Issues None 4. Approval of Minutes 06:17 a. June 23, 2020 Special Council Page 2 b. July 7, 2020 Council Page 5 c. July 21, 2020 Special Council Page 19 5. Business Arising from Minutes a. June 23, 2020 Special Council None Page 2 b. July 7, 2020 Council None Page 5 c. July 21, 2020 Special Council None Page 19 6. Planning & Inspection Services a. Campground Rezoning Application (Legal Opinion) 10:03 Page 25 7. Administration a. Proposed Amendments to Policy HR-06-016: Maternity and Parental Leave for Page 29 Non-Unionized Employees (Final Approval) 13:38 b. Proposed Amendments to Policy HR-06-017: Non-Unionized Employee Vacation Page 32 and Overtime (Final Approval) 17:18 c. Council and Committee of the Whole Meeting Structure 26:20 Page 38 d. Community Grant Allocations 80:11 Page 49 e. Update to Action Plan for Ending Racism and Discrimination 95:28 Page 53 8. Financial Services a. 2020-21 Capital Investment Plan 117:12 Page 56 b. Council Update Report - COVID-19 Response 157:07 Page 75 c. 2020/21 Area Rate Levies for Fire 243:55 Page 95 9. Engineering & Public Works, Lands and Parks Services a. Award of Contract 20-22: Greenwood Production Well Drilling 251:21 Page 99 10. Councillor Item a.
    [Show full text]
  • GST/HST Incremental Federal Rebate for Municipalities Report - January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015
    GST/HST Incremental Federal Rebate for Municipalities Report - January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015 Nova Scotia POSTAL PAYMENT LEGAL NAME CITY NAME CODE AMOUNT ALBRO COURT HOUSING CO-OPERATIVE LIMITED DARTMOUTH B3A $222.46 ALDERWOOD REST HOME BADDECK B0E $16,422.34 ALMA FIRE DEPARTMENT WESTVILLE B0K $9,791.12 ANNAPOLIS DIGBY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY DIGBY B0V $1,193.59 ANNAPOLIS ROYAL FIRE DEPT ANNAPOLIS ROYAL B0S $2,040.02 ANNAPOLIS VALLEY REGIONAL LIBRARY BRIDGETOWN B0S $7,529.21 AYLESFORD DISTRICT FIRE COMMISSIONERS AYLESFORD B0P $9,539.55 BARNEY'S RIVER VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT BARNEYS RIVER B0K $5,352.12 BATESTON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT BATESTON B1C $621.33 BAY SIDE HOME CORPORATION BARRINGTON B0W $5,082.36 BEAVERBANK WATER SUPPLY LIMITED LOWER SACKVILLE B4C $2,629.18 BIRCH GROVE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT BIRCH GROVE B1B $204.76 BLOCKHOUSE AND DISTRICT FIRE DEPARTMENT BLOCKHOUSE B0J $3,562.78 BOISDALE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT BOISDALE B1Y $314.73 BROOKFIELD FIRE & EMERGENCY SERVICES BROOKFIELD B0N $6,631.72 CANSO SEASIDE MANOR CANSO B0H $6,382.08 CAPE BRETON ASSOCIATION FOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT SYDNEY B1P $10,188.31 CAPE BRETON ISLAND HOUSING AUTHORITY SYDNEY B1P $119,273.65 CAPE BRETON REGIONAL LIBRARY BOARD SYDNEY B1P $9,853.67 CAPE BRETON REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY SYDNEY B1P $1,263,199.40 CARIBOU DISTRICT FIRE DEPT PICTOU B0K $634.17 CARLETON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT YARMOUTH B5A $852.24 CENTRAL HIGHLANDS ASSOCIATION OF THE DISABLED NEW GLASGOW B2H $3,466.77 CHESTER BASIN FIRE COMMISSIONERS CHESTER BASIN B0J $4,499.80 CHETICAMP VOLUNTARY
    [Show full text]
  • THE EXPERIENCE of ORGANIZING MICHELIN, 1971-19891 By
    THE EXPERIENCE OF ORGANIZING MICHELIN, 1971-19891 by Andrew Anningson, Gregor Bertram, Darren Burns, Pamela Chase, Paul Holt, Chris McDonald, Steven Montgomerie, John Russell, Alex Stevenson, Jane Taylor, Todd Taylor, and Melanie Tonge. Edited by A. Thomson. 1992 Introduction Gregor Bertram and Andrew Anningson The experience of organizing Michelin workers in Nova Scotia was quite different for each of the parties involved. Labour struggles are two-sided affairs. When the crunch comes, there is no neutral, middle ground. Each party presents its part of the story as though only their version does justice to the issues. This sense of bias is found, to a certain extent, in the media coverage of the events. Depending on the point of view of the writer and on the intended audience, the author gives more weight to certain issues and interpretations than others, either blatantly or more indirectly. Much of this story about organizing Michelin concerns the actions and reactions of the contending groups to each other in their determination to win the struggle. Michelin was determined to remain union-free; various unions operating in Nova Scotia had other ideas. If the situation were to be described simply, it would appear to reflect constant jockeying for position in the control of the worker’s situation. By the end of the nearly two-decade battle, Michelin had the upper hand, as they had through most of the time, and as had been the case from the very beginning, they had the full support of the provincial government in ensuring that a union did not make headway with Michelin workers.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter Storm Preparedness and Response Plan, 2019-09.Pdf
    Kings County, NS Winter Storm Preparedness & Response Plan September 2019 Table of Contents – Winter Storm Preparedness and Response Plan FOREWORD ............................................................................................................................................. 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 2 1.1 Background .......................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Authorities............................................................................................................................ 3 1.3 References............................................................................................................................ 4 1.4 Purpose ................................................................................................................................ 4 1.5 Aim and Scope ...................................................................................................................... 4 2.0 CONCEPT OF OPERATIONS (CONOPS) ............................................................................................ 5 2.1 Planning Assumptions ........................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Plan Limitations .................................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Incident Planning
    [Show full text]
  • 2020/21 Area Rate Levies for Fire
    Municipality of the County of Kings Request for Decision TO Council PREPARED BY Scott MacKay, Revenue Manager MEETING DATE August 18, 2020 SUBJECT 2020/21 Area Rate Levies for Fire ORIGIN Fire and Recreation Area Rates Policy FIN -05-007 Nova Scotia Utility & Review Board (UARB) orders related to Annual Fire Protection Rates (hydrant charges) to be paid to water utilities Municipal Government Act (MGA), Section 75 Council Meeting of July 7, 2020 RECOMMENDATION That Municipal Council approve the levying, collection and remittance of the Fire Area Rate for the Hants Border area at a rate of $0.026 per $100 assessment, as per Appendix A: Area Rates 2020-21 of the August 18, 2020 Request for Decision. That Municipal Council approve the 4% administration fee charged against the area rates for the fire commissions of Canning, Aylesford and Greenwich, as per Appendix B: Area Rates for Fire Commissions 2020/21 of the August 18, 2020 Request for Decision. INTENT To provide Council with the relevant information necessary to make an informed decision in relation to the proposed area rates for 2020/21. DISCUSSION Each year Council is asked to approve the levy of area rates for fire departments, fire protection rates (hydrant rates) for water utilities, and uniform charges for recreation, in accordance with Policy Fin-05- 007, or UARB orders related to Annual Fire Protection Rates. Area rates do not continue automatically from year to year. Fire Departments, and incorporated Recreation Organizations who provide services to the Municipality’s residents must submit an application each year. Fire Protection rates (hydrant rates) are set by the UARB.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Council August 31, 2021
    THE MUNICIPALITY OF THE COUNTY OF KINGS SPECIAL MUNICIPAL COUNCIL August 31, 2021 9:00 a.m. AGENDA Audio Recording Times Noted in Red (Minutes:Seconds) 1. Roll Call 00:00 2. Approval of Agenda 03:03 Page 1 3. Disclosure of Conflict of Interest Issues None 4. Financial Services a. Approval of West Hants Regional Municipality’s Capital Budget for Page 2 Hantsport Fire Department and Approval of Hants Border Fire Area Rate 04:39 b. 2021/22 Capital Investment Plan and Canada Community–Building Fund Page 7 Allocation to Villages 14:21 5. Other Business 45:11 Russia Road Barricade 6. Comments from the Public None 7. Adjournment 49:02 Special Council 2021-08-31 Page 1 Municipality of the County of Kings Request for Decision TO Municipal Council PREPARED BY Scott MacKay, Revenue Manager MEETING DATE August 31, 2021 Approval of West Hants Regional Municipality’s Capital Budget for Hantsport SUBJECT Fire Department and Approval of Hants Border Fire Area Rate ORIGIN • Municipal Government Act, Part X, Fire and Emergency Services • Fire and Recreation Area Rates Policy FIN-05-007 • Fire Services Agreement with Municipality of the District of West Hants (expired) • July 6, 2021 Council Motion RECOMMENDATIONS 1. That Municipal Council approve the capital budget of the Hantsport Fire Department as submitted by the West Hants Regional Municipality for the 2021/2022 fiscal year. 2. That Municipal Council approve the levying, collection and remittance of the Fire Area Rate for the Hants Border area at a rate of $0.026 per $100 assessment, per Appendix B: Area Rates 2021-22 of the August 31, 2021 Request for Decision.
    [Show full text]
  • Viewed by the Regional Emergency Management Planning Committee, September 19, 2018, and the Regional Emergency Management Advisory Committee, October 15, 2018
    Committee of the Whole Tuesday, November 6, 2018 8:30 a.m. Council Chambers, Town Hall 359 Main Street Agenda Call to Order 1. Approval of Agenda 2. Approval of Minutes: a. Committee of the Whole Minutes, October 2, 2018 3. Presentations: a. Valley REN – Quarterly Update 4. Public Input/Question Period Procedure: A thirty-minute time period will be provided for members of the public to address Council regarding questions, concerns and/or ideas. Each person will have a maximum of two minutes to address Council with a second two-minute time period provided if there is time remaining within the thirty- minute Public Input/Question Period timeframe. 5. Committee Reports (Internal) a. Emergency Management Advisory Committee Website RFD 071-2018 – Kings REMO EM Plan b. Town & Gown Committee Website c. Art in Public Spaces Committee Website d. Audit Committee Website Information Report: 2nd Quarter Variance Report 359 Main Street | Wolfville | NS | B4P 1A1 | t 902-542-5767 | f 902-542-4789 Wolfville.ca e. Planning Advisory Committee Website f. Environmental Sustainability Committee Website 6. Staff Reports for Discussion a. Information Report: 2019/20 Capital Budget and Operating Direction b. Info Report - Crosswalk Flags c. RFD 072-2018: Council-Committees of Council Meeting Schedule 2019 d. RFD 074-2018: Council Appointments to Committees of Council e. RFD 068-2018: CRA Stipends f. RFD 075-2018: Craft Beverage Industry – Accessory Use Options 7. CAO Report 8. Request for Additions to Agenda a. Joint Meeting with County of Kings 9. Committee Reports (External) a. Valley Waste Resource Management (VWRM) website b.
    [Show full text]
  • 19.09.19 Liste Des Villes Et Zones NS.Xlsx
    Ville -City Zone Ville -City Zone Ville -City Zone A A A A And D Trailer Park 2 Alpine Ridge 4 Armstrong Lake 2 Aalders Landing 2 Alton 2 Arnold 3 Abercrombie 2 Amherst 2 Ashby 4 Aberdeen 4 Amherst Head 2 Ashdale 2 Abram River 3 Amherst Point 2 Ashdale (West Hants) 2 Abrams River 3 Amherst Shore 2 Ashfield 4 Acaciaville 3 Amirault Hill 3 Ashfield Station 4 Academy 2 Amiraults Corner 3 Ashmore 3 Addington Forks 2 Amiraults Hill 3 Askilton 4 Admiral Rock 2 Anderson Mountain 2 Aspen 2 Advocate Harbour 2 Angevine Lake 2 Aspotogan 3 Africville 1 Annandale 2 Aspy Bay 4 Afton 2 Annapolis 2 Athol 2 Afton Station 2 Annapolis Royal 2 Athol Road 2 Aikens 2 Annapolis Valley 2 Athol Station 2 Ainslie Glen 4 Annapolis, Subd. A 2 Atkinson 2 Ainslie Point 4 Annapolis, Subd. B 2 Atlanta 2 Ainslieview 4 Annapolis, Subd. C 2 Atlantic 3 Alba 4 Annapolis, Subd. D 2 Atwood Brook 3 Alba Station 4 Antigonish 2 Atwoods Brook 3 Albany 2 Antigonish Harbour 2 Atwood's Brook 3 Albany Cross 2 Antigonish Landing 2 Atwoods Brook Station 3 Albany New 2 Antigonish, Subd. A 2 Auburn 2 Albert Bridge 4 Antigonish, Subd. B 2 Auburndale 3 Albro Lake 1 Antrim 1 Auld Cove 2 Alder Plains 3 Apple River 2 Aulds Cove 2 Alder Point 4 Arcadia 3 Avondale (Pictou, Subd. B) 2 Alder River 2 Archibald 2 Avondale (West Hants) 2 Alderney Point 4 Archibalds Mill 2 Avondale Station 2 Aldershot 2 Ardness 2 Avonport 2 Aldersville 3 Ardoise 2 Avonport Station 2 Alderwood Acres 1 Argyle 2 Aylesford 2 Alderwood Trailer Court 1 Argyle 3 Aylesford East 2 Allains Creek 2 Argyle Head 3 Aylesford Lake
    [Show full text]
  • Kings County, NS Regional Emergency Management Plan (REMP)
    Kings County, NS Regional Emergency Management Plan (REMP) September 2018 Table of Contents FOREWORD .......................................................................................................................................1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................2 1.1 Preface ....................................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Relevant Legislation................................................................................................................... 2 2.0 OBJECTIVES OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT .............................................................................6 2.1 Objective 1 – Assess Risks ......................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Objective 2 – Mitigate Risks ...................................................................................................... 6 2.3 Objective 3 – Plan for Response ................................................................................................ 7 2.4 Objective 4 – Plan for Recovery ................................................................................................ 7 2.5 Objective 5 – Ensure Preparedness ........................................................................................... 7 2.6 Objective 6 – Evaluate and Renew the Program ......................................................................
    [Show full text]