Town Council Meeting February 19, 2019 6:30 P.M

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Town Council Meeting February 19, 2019 6:30 P.M Town Council Meeting February 19, 2019 6:30 p.m. Council Chambers, Town Hall 359 Main Street Agenda Call to Order 1. Approval of Agenda 2. Approval of Minutes a. In-Camera Town Council Meeting, October 16, 2018 b. In-Camera Special Town Council Meeting, January 15, 2019 c. Town Council Meeting, January 22, 2019 d. In-Camera Town Council Meeting, January 22, 2019 e. Special Town Council Meeting, February 4, 2019 3. Comments from the Mayor 4. Public Input / Question Period Procedure: A thirty-minute time period will be provided for members of the public to address Council regarding questions, concerns and/or ideas. Each person will have a maximum of two minutes to address Council with a second two-minute time period provided if there is time within the thirty-minute Public Input / Question timeframe. 359 Main Street | Wolfville | NS | B4P 1A1 | t 902-542-5767 | f 902-542-4789 Wolfville.ca 5. Motions/Recommendations from Committee of the Whole, February 5, 2019: a. RFD 007-2019: Art Site Map b. RFD 006-2019: Art Plan c. RFD 008-2019: 102 Main Street d. RFD: 081-2018: Gaspereau Ave D.A e. RFD 002-2019: Kings REMO Emergency Evacuation Plan f. RFD 005-2019: Culinary Tourism Centre g. RFD 004-2019: Valley REN 6. New Business a. RFD 081-2018: Accessibility Plan b. RFD 011-2019: Annual Appointment of Financial Auditor c. Info Report – Operations Plan 7. Correspondence: a. John Andrew: Invitation, Coldest Night of the Year 2019. b. Jane Warren: Replacement 35 km/h speed sign needed. Please note that any correspondence related to the proposed MPS and LUB craft beverage amendments will be part of the Public Hearing package on March 4, 2019 and will also be included as part of the Council meeting where 2nd reading is considered. 8. Public Input / Question Period: Procedure: A thirty-minute time period will be provided for members of the public to address Council regarding questions, concerns and/or ideas. Each person will have a maximum of two minutes to address Council with a second two-minute time period provided if there is time remaining within the thirty-minute Public Input/Question Period timeframe. 9. Regular Meeting Adjourned 359 Main Street | Wolfville | NS | B4P 1A1 | t 902-542-5767 | f 902-542-4789 Wolfville.ca REQUEST FOR DECISION 007-2019 Title: Public Art Site Plan Date: 2019-02-05 Department: Development & Planning SUMMARY A request for Council to adopt a Public Art Site Plan to designate areas for public art, as outlined in the Public Art Policy, in anticipation of a future request for proposals for public art on a site(s) outlined in the Public Art Site Plan. DRAFT MOTION: That Council approve the Public Art Site Plan as outlined in Attachment 3. Request for Decision, Page 1 of 9 REQUEST FOR DECISION 007-2019 Title: Public Art Site Plan Date: 2019-02-05 Department: Development & Planning 1) CAO COMMENTS The CAO supports the recommendations of staff. 2) LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY The Municipal Government Act Section 47 enables Council to make decisions in the exercise of its powers on behalf of the Municipality, which includes directing staff and adopting policy. Public Art Policy #760-002 outlines the responsibilities of the Art in Public Spaces Committee in recommending and advising Council regarding Public Art. 3) STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff believe the Public Art Site Plan is appropriate for the detail of public art planning within the Town of Wolfville. 4) REFERENCES AND ATTACHMENTS 1. What is CPTED? (attached) 2. DRAFT Wolfville Art Inventory and Sites for Consideration Map 3. Public Art Site Plan (attached) 5) DISCUSSION Upon review of the “DRAFT Wolfville Art Inventory and Sites for Consideration,” The Art in Public Spaces Committee recognized the need to renew the Public Art Site Plan to better consider art within the Town of Wolfville. A working group was struck to do so. The working group met on Friday August 17th, 2018 and recognized the need to consider areas for public art rather than specific points or locations. Discussion included considering areas for specific themes; e.g. areas focused on “Historic art” or “contemporary art,” yet the option for the Town to dedicate areas to specific themes was considered unnecessary and overly regulatory for artists. Areas within the Town of Wolfville identified for public art included significant parks and areas with significant “eyes on the street” rather than private, or less-used, public areas. It was recognized that areas with low qualities of Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED) are ideal areas for vandalism or minor graffiti and therefore should not be considered for public art. For more information on CPTED, see attachment 2. Areas considered ideal for public art include: • Central Commercial Area, • East End Gateway Area, • Quiet Park, Request for Decision, Page 2 of 9 REQUEST FOR DECISION 007-2019 Title: Public Art Site Plan Date: 2019-02-05 Department: Development & Planning • Reservoir Park, • the Old Burying Ground, • Millennium Trail, • Harvest Moon Trail. 6) FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS There is no direct financial implication from this request for decision. This map will focus future investment in art within the areas outlined on the Public Art Site Plan. 7) REFERENCES TO COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN AND TOWN REPORTS This project will enable Staff to move forward Council’s strategic direction and sub goals from the 2017- 2021 Strategic plan towards: • Improving Quality of Life for All o offer a dynamic quality of life grounded in the Town’s leisure, culture and recreation activities • Leveraging our economic opportunities o make the downtown core more user friendly. o ensure the Town owned and/or funded infrastructure meets the needs of the community 8) COMMUNICATION REQUIREMENTS None at this time. 9) ALTERNATIVES a. Alter the map as attached and recommend Council adopt a revised map. b. Continue using the existing “DRAFT Wolfville Art Inventory and Sites for Consideration Map” (see attachment 2). Request for Decision, Page 3 of 9 REQUEST FOR DECISION 007-2019 Title: Public Art Site Plan Date: 2019-02-05 Department: Development & Planning ATTACHMENT 1 - WHAT IS CPTED? From http://www.cptedontario.ca/mission/what-is-cpted CPTED is a proactive design philosophy built around a core set of principles that is based on the belief that the proper design and effective use of the built environment can lead to a reduction in the fear and incidence of crime as well as an improvement in the quality of life. CPTED goes well beyond conventional approaches to safeguarding the environment by exploiting natural forms of surveillance, access control and territorial reinforcement in a deliberate attempt to present a psychological deterrent for the purpose of positively influencing human behaviour as people interact with the environment. It is through these proven applications of CPTED principles that CPTED and its practitioners earn their well-deserved reputation for manipulating the environment which, by no coincidence, serves as the conceptual thrust for the concept. Far less appreciated is CPTED’s true emphasis which is directed towards assisting the objective of the human activity and, through this process, lowering our exposure to crime and loss. It is largely for this reason, that CPTED enjoys its broad appeal and has a significant, yet modest, reputation for promoting good design. What are its benefits? CPTED offers a number of benefits including major cost savings when the principles are applied at an early stage in the design process. For best results, a CPTED space assessment should be undertaken as part of the concept plan. A space assessment can minimize the potential for conflict and confusion by matching the intended functions with a space that can support it. It will also offer insights into how well the designated purpose of the space (designation for short) meshes with the intended function and how the definition and design of a space can help to ensure that an intended activity can function well while, at the same time, providing support for the control of the human behaviour. Potential CPTED benefits include: • productive use of space • improved function and/or profit • reduced exposure to fear, crime, loss and liability • partnerships and problem solving • improved quality of life, and • major cost savings. What are CPTED’s core principles? CPTED has three main principles. They are: • natural surveillance, • natural access control, and Request for Decision, Page 4 of 9 REQUEST FOR DECISION 007-2019 Title: Public Art Site Plan Date: 2019-02-05 Department: Development & Planning • territorial reinforcement. Natural Surveillance The concept of natural surveillance was first identified by Oscar Newman as one of four requirements needed for the establishment of Defensible Space. Natural surveillance is a design strategy that is directed at keeping intruders under observation. It is based on a simple premise that a person inclined to engage in criminality will be less likely to act on their impulse if he or she can be seen. Natural surveillance is commonly associated with the establishment of clear sightlines. While generally a worthwhile goal, the pursuit of clear sightlines must be tempered by a number of considerations including the ability to capitalize and/or generate witness potential and the need to establish and provide for landscaping. Successful natural surveillance applications include: • orienting driveways and paths towards natural forms of surveillance such as building entrances and windows • increasing visual permeability of vulnerable areas such as building entrances, stairwells, playgrounds etc. through the strategic use of windows, fencing material , landscaping etc., • trimming back overgrown landscaping • strategically lighting pathways and other potentially problematic areas where opportunities for natural surveillance exist, and • developing uses for the environment that are capable of strategically generating activity. This can include the establishment of sidewalk patios, seating areas and other amenities.
Recommended publications
  • Pdf Fire Services Final Report (1.74
    To: Kelliann Dean, Deputy Minister, Department of Municipal Affairs Deputy Mayor Laurie Murley, President, UNSM Marie Walsh, President, AMANS Rod Nielsen President, Fire Services Association From: Fire Services Study Steering Committee Date: August 3, 2017 Re: Municipal Review of Fire Services in Nova Scotia As you are aware, the Union of Nova Scotia Municipalities and the Association of Municipal Administrators of Nova Scotia, with the financial support of the Province of Nova Scotia, engaged a consultant to facilitate a frank and open discussion on fire services. The consultant was asked to meet with representative stakeholders to ascertain and prioritize key issues at the local level, to consider opportunities to address these issues, and to facilitate the sharing of best practices, lessons learned and possible areas for collaboration. The work of the consultant was overseen by a Project Steering Committee comprised of representatives from UNSM, AMANS, the Fire Services Association and the Fire Marshal’s Office. The task of the Project Steering Committee was to select the consultant, to ensure the terms of reference were met and to facilitate the work of the consultant. Pomax Consulting was engaged to undertake the review. Their report is attached in Appendix B. Project Steering Committee Observations The Consultant has fulfilled the terms of reference. The Project Steering Committee recognizes the hard work of the consultant in documenting stakeholders’ views and concerns. The recommendations of the consultant make sense, in that the issues are complex and not solved by one group alone. The need to work together is paramount. During the stakeholder consultations, it became evident that there were varying degrees of understanding with respect to fire services in Nova Scotia, particularly around authority and areas of responsibility.
    [Show full text]
  • Options for Accessibility Advisory Committee
    Municipality of the County of Kings Request for Decision TO Council PREPARED BY Gordon Roussel, Policy Analyst MEETING DATE October 6, 2020 SUBJECT Options for Accessibility Advisory Committee ORIGIN • Nova Scotia Accessibility Act, Chp 2, RSNS 2017 requires that all municipalities form an Accessibility Advisory Committee and complete an accessibility plan no later than April 1, 2021. • October 16, 2019 Village-Municipal Meeting Presentation ‘Accessibility Planning for Municipalities’. RECOMMENDATION That Municipal Council approve entering into discussions with the seven Villages located in Kings County regarding the formation of a Joint Accessibility Advisory Committee consisting of: i. one member of Council who is also a member of the Kings Transit Authority Board of Directors, ii. one Commissioner from each of the seven Villages, and iii. eight members of the public who either have a disability or represent an organization that represents people with disabilities. At a minimum, that would include one member of the public who has a disability from each of the Western, Central, and Eastern areas of the Municipality, as shown on the map in Schedule A of the Planning Advisory Committee Policy (PLAN-09-003). Should no applications for citizen members be received from one of the three areas, an applicant from another part of the Municipality may be appointed to represent that area. INTENT To form an Accessibility Advisory Committee (AAC) and prepare an Accessibility Plan as required by the Province of Nova Scotia Accessibility Act by April 1, 2021 or such later date as may be set by the Nova Scotia Accessibility Directorate as a result of the Provincial State of Emergency declared on March 22, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • COMMITTEE of the WHOLE November 17, 2020 9:00 Am AGENDA Audio Recording Times Noted in Red (Minutes:Seconds)
    THE MUNICIPALITY OF THE COUNTY OF KINGS COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE November 17, 2020 9:00 am AGENDA Audio Recording Times Noted in Red (Minutes:Seconds) 1. Roll Call 00:00 2. Approval of Agenda 01:40 Page 1 3. Disclosure of Conflict of Interest Issues 02:14 4. Approval of Minutes a. September 15, 2020 03:49 Page 2 5. Business Arising from Minutes a. September 15, 2020 None Page 2 6. Administration a. Proposed Repeal of Policy PRO-10-002: Fire Grants 04:50 Page 10 b. Proposed Amendments to Policy FIN-05-020: Hospitality 12:43 Page 17 c. Municipal Branding/Visual Identity Briefing 17:30 Page 31 7. Engineering & Public Works, Lands and Parks Services a. FY2021-2022 Priority List Provincial/Subdivision Road Resurfacing Program 26:27 Page 34 b. Award of Contract 20-24: New EPW Operations Centre 73:15 Page 48 8. Correspondence 102:09 a. 2020-10-30 Soldiers Memorial Hospital Foundation Thank You 102:27 Page 56 b. 2020-11-02 Nova Scotia Health Information 102:43 Page 57 c. 2020-11-03 Commissionaires re: Remembrance Day 102:58 Page 59 d. 2020-11-03 Grand View Manor Thank You 103:09 Page 60 e. 2020-11-05 Village of New Minas re: Thunder in the Valley 103:23 Page 61 f. 2020-11-06 Village of New Minas re: Thunder in the Valley Mayor’s Response 104:24 Page 62 g. 2020-11-05 Gaspereau Valley Elementary School Thank You 104:35 Page 64 h. 2020-11-06 Village of Kingston Response to J-Class Road Funding 105:08 Page 65 i.
    [Show full text]
  • Approval of Agenda 03:52 Page 1 3
    THE MUNICIPALITY OF THE COUNTY OF KINGS MUNICIPAL COUNCIL August 18, 2020 9:00 am AGENDA Audio Recording Times Noted in Red (Minutes:Seconds) 1. Roll Call 00:00 2. Approval of Agenda 03:52 Page 1 3. Disclosure of Conflict of Interest Issues None 4. Approval of Minutes 06:17 a. June 23, 2020 Special Council Page 2 b. July 7, 2020 Council Page 5 c. July 21, 2020 Special Council Page 19 5. Business Arising from Minutes a. June 23, 2020 Special Council None Page 2 b. July 7, 2020 Council None Page 5 c. July 21, 2020 Special Council None Page 19 6. Planning & Inspection Services a. Campground Rezoning Application (Legal Opinion) 10:03 Page 25 7. Administration a. Proposed Amendments to Policy HR-06-016: Maternity and Parental Leave for Page 29 Non-Unionized Employees (Final Approval) 13:38 b. Proposed Amendments to Policy HR-06-017: Non-Unionized Employee Vacation Page 32 and Overtime (Final Approval) 17:18 c. Council and Committee of the Whole Meeting Structure 26:20 Page 38 d. Community Grant Allocations 80:11 Page 49 e. Update to Action Plan for Ending Racism and Discrimination 95:28 Page 53 8. Financial Services a. 2020-21 Capital Investment Plan 117:12 Page 56 b. Council Update Report - COVID-19 Response 157:07 Page 75 c. 2020/21 Area Rate Levies for Fire 243:55 Page 95 9. Engineering & Public Works, Lands and Parks Services a. Award of Contract 20-22: Greenwood Production Well Drilling 251:21 Page 99 10. Councillor Item a.
    [Show full text]
  • GST/HST Incremental Federal Rebate for Municipalities Report - January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015
    GST/HST Incremental Federal Rebate for Municipalities Report - January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015 Nova Scotia POSTAL PAYMENT LEGAL NAME CITY NAME CODE AMOUNT ALBRO COURT HOUSING CO-OPERATIVE LIMITED DARTMOUTH B3A $222.46 ALDERWOOD REST HOME BADDECK B0E $16,422.34 ALMA FIRE DEPARTMENT WESTVILLE B0K $9,791.12 ANNAPOLIS DIGBY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY DIGBY B0V $1,193.59 ANNAPOLIS ROYAL FIRE DEPT ANNAPOLIS ROYAL B0S $2,040.02 ANNAPOLIS VALLEY REGIONAL LIBRARY BRIDGETOWN B0S $7,529.21 AYLESFORD DISTRICT FIRE COMMISSIONERS AYLESFORD B0P $9,539.55 BARNEY'S RIVER VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT BARNEYS RIVER B0K $5,352.12 BATESTON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT BATESTON B1C $621.33 BAY SIDE HOME CORPORATION BARRINGTON B0W $5,082.36 BEAVERBANK WATER SUPPLY LIMITED LOWER SACKVILLE B4C $2,629.18 BIRCH GROVE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT BIRCH GROVE B1B $204.76 BLOCKHOUSE AND DISTRICT FIRE DEPARTMENT BLOCKHOUSE B0J $3,562.78 BOISDALE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT BOISDALE B1Y $314.73 BROOKFIELD FIRE & EMERGENCY SERVICES BROOKFIELD B0N $6,631.72 CANSO SEASIDE MANOR CANSO B0H $6,382.08 CAPE BRETON ASSOCIATION FOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT SYDNEY B1P $10,188.31 CAPE BRETON ISLAND HOUSING AUTHORITY SYDNEY B1P $119,273.65 CAPE BRETON REGIONAL LIBRARY BOARD SYDNEY B1P $9,853.67 CAPE BRETON REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY SYDNEY B1P $1,263,199.40 CARIBOU DISTRICT FIRE DEPT PICTOU B0K $634.17 CARLETON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT YARMOUTH B5A $852.24 CENTRAL HIGHLANDS ASSOCIATION OF THE DISABLED NEW GLASGOW B2H $3,466.77 CHESTER BASIN FIRE COMMISSIONERS CHESTER BASIN B0J $4,499.80 CHETICAMP VOLUNTARY
    [Show full text]
  • THE EXPERIENCE of ORGANIZING MICHELIN, 1971-19891 By
    THE EXPERIENCE OF ORGANIZING MICHELIN, 1971-19891 by Andrew Anningson, Gregor Bertram, Darren Burns, Pamela Chase, Paul Holt, Chris McDonald, Steven Montgomerie, John Russell, Alex Stevenson, Jane Taylor, Todd Taylor, and Melanie Tonge. Edited by A. Thomson. 1992 Introduction Gregor Bertram and Andrew Anningson The experience of organizing Michelin workers in Nova Scotia was quite different for each of the parties involved. Labour struggles are two-sided affairs. When the crunch comes, there is no neutral, middle ground. Each party presents its part of the story as though only their version does justice to the issues. This sense of bias is found, to a certain extent, in the media coverage of the events. Depending on the point of view of the writer and on the intended audience, the author gives more weight to certain issues and interpretations than others, either blatantly or more indirectly. Much of this story about organizing Michelin concerns the actions and reactions of the contending groups to each other in their determination to win the struggle. Michelin was determined to remain union-free; various unions operating in Nova Scotia had other ideas. If the situation were to be described simply, it would appear to reflect constant jockeying for position in the control of the worker’s situation. By the end of the nearly two-decade battle, Michelin had the upper hand, as they had through most of the time, and as had been the case from the very beginning, they had the full support of the provincial government in ensuring that a union did not make headway with Michelin workers.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter Storm Preparedness and Response Plan, 2019-09.Pdf
    Kings County, NS Winter Storm Preparedness & Response Plan September 2019 Table of Contents – Winter Storm Preparedness and Response Plan FOREWORD ............................................................................................................................................. 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 2 1.1 Background .......................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Authorities............................................................................................................................ 3 1.3 References............................................................................................................................ 4 1.4 Purpose ................................................................................................................................ 4 1.5 Aim and Scope ...................................................................................................................... 4 2.0 CONCEPT OF OPERATIONS (CONOPS) ............................................................................................ 5 2.1 Planning Assumptions ........................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Plan Limitations .................................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Incident Planning
    [Show full text]
  • 2020/21 Area Rate Levies for Fire
    Municipality of the County of Kings Request for Decision TO Council PREPARED BY Scott MacKay, Revenue Manager MEETING DATE August 18, 2020 SUBJECT 2020/21 Area Rate Levies for Fire ORIGIN Fire and Recreation Area Rates Policy FIN -05-007 Nova Scotia Utility & Review Board (UARB) orders related to Annual Fire Protection Rates (hydrant charges) to be paid to water utilities Municipal Government Act (MGA), Section 75 Council Meeting of July 7, 2020 RECOMMENDATION That Municipal Council approve the levying, collection and remittance of the Fire Area Rate for the Hants Border area at a rate of $0.026 per $100 assessment, as per Appendix A: Area Rates 2020-21 of the August 18, 2020 Request for Decision. That Municipal Council approve the 4% administration fee charged against the area rates for the fire commissions of Canning, Aylesford and Greenwich, as per Appendix B: Area Rates for Fire Commissions 2020/21 of the August 18, 2020 Request for Decision. INTENT To provide Council with the relevant information necessary to make an informed decision in relation to the proposed area rates for 2020/21. DISCUSSION Each year Council is asked to approve the levy of area rates for fire departments, fire protection rates (hydrant rates) for water utilities, and uniform charges for recreation, in accordance with Policy Fin-05- 007, or UARB orders related to Annual Fire Protection Rates. Area rates do not continue automatically from year to year. Fire Departments, and incorporated Recreation Organizations who provide services to the Municipality’s residents must submit an application each year. Fire Protection rates (hydrant rates) are set by the UARB.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Council August 31, 2021
    THE MUNICIPALITY OF THE COUNTY OF KINGS SPECIAL MUNICIPAL COUNCIL August 31, 2021 9:00 a.m. AGENDA Audio Recording Times Noted in Red (Minutes:Seconds) 1. Roll Call 00:00 2. Approval of Agenda 03:03 Page 1 3. Disclosure of Conflict of Interest Issues None 4. Financial Services a. Approval of West Hants Regional Municipality’s Capital Budget for Page 2 Hantsport Fire Department and Approval of Hants Border Fire Area Rate 04:39 b. 2021/22 Capital Investment Plan and Canada Community–Building Fund Page 7 Allocation to Villages 14:21 5. Other Business 45:11 Russia Road Barricade 6. Comments from the Public None 7. Adjournment 49:02 Special Council 2021-08-31 Page 1 Municipality of the County of Kings Request for Decision TO Municipal Council PREPARED BY Scott MacKay, Revenue Manager MEETING DATE August 31, 2021 Approval of West Hants Regional Municipality’s Capital Budget for Hantsport SUBJECT Fire Department and Approval of Hants Border Fire Area Rate ORIGIN • Municipal Government Act, Part X, Fire and Emergency Services • Fire and Recreation Area Rates Policy FIN-05-007 • Fire Services Agreement with Municipality of the District of West Hants (expired) • July 6, 2021 Council Motion RECOMMENDATIONS 1. That Municipal Council approve the capital budget of the Hantsport Fire Department as submitted by the West Hants Regional Municipality for the 2021/2022 fiscal year. 2. That Municipal Council approve the levying, collection and remittance of the Fire Area Rate for the Hants Border area at a rate of $0.026 per $100 assessment, per Appendix B: Area Rates 2021-22 of the August 31, 2021 Request for Decision.
    [Show full text]
  • Viewed by the Regional Emergency Management Planning Committee, September 19, 2018, and the Regional Emergency Management Advisory Committee, October 15, 2018
    Committee of the Whole Tuesday, November 6, 2018 8:30 a.m. Council Chambers, Town Hall 359 Main Street Agenda Call to Order 1. Approval of Agenda 2. Approval of Minutes: a. Committee of the Whole Minutes, October 2, 2018 3. Presentations: a. Valley REN – Quarterly Update 4. Public Input/Question Period Procedure: A thirty-minute time period will be provided for members of the public to address Council regarding questions, concerns and/or ideas. Each person will have a maximum of two minutes to address Council with a second two-minute time period provided if there is time remaining within the thirty- minute Public Input/Question Period timeframe. 5. Committee Reports (Internal) a. Emergency Management Advisory Committee Website RFD 071-2018 – Kings REMO EM Plan b. Town & Gown Committee Website c. Art in Public Spaces Committee Website d. Audit Committee Website Information Report: 2nd Quarter Variance Report 359 Main Street | Wolfville | NS | B4P 1A1 | t 902-542-5767 | f 902-542-4789 Wolfville.ca e. Planning Advisory Committee Website f. Environmental Sustainability Committee Website 6. Staff Reports for Discussion a. Information Report: 2019/20 Capital Budget and Operating Direction b. Info Report - Crosswalk Flags c. RFD 072-2018: Council-Committees of Council Meeting Schedule 2019 d. RFD 074-2018: Council Appointments to Committees of Council e. RFD 068-2018: CRA Stipends f. RFD 075-2018: Craft Beverage Industry – Accessory Use Options 7. CAO Report 8. Request for Additions to Agenda a. Joint Meeting with County of Kings 9. Committee Reports (External) a. Valley Waste Resource Management (VWRM) website b.
    [Show full text]
  • 19.09.19 Liste Des Villes Et Zones NS.Xlsx
    Ville -City Zone Ville -City Zone Ville -City Zone A A A A And D Trailer Park 2 Alpine Ridge 4 Armstrong Lake 2 Aalders Landing 2 Alton 2 Arnold 3 Abercrombie 2 Amherst 2 Ashby 4 Aberdeen 4 Amherst Head 2 Ashdale 2 Abram River 3 Amherst Point 2 Ashdale (West Hants) 2 Abrams River 3 Amherst Shore 2 Ashfield 4 Acaciaville 3 Amirault Hill 3 Ashfield Station 4 Academy 2 Amiraults Corner 3 Ashmore 3 Addington Forks 2 Amiraults Hill 3 Askilton 4 Admiral Rock 2 Anderson Mountain 2 Aspen 2 Advocate Harbour 2 Angevine Lake 2 Aspotogan 3 Africville 1 Annandale 2 Aspy Bay 4 Afton 2 Annapolis 2 Athol 2 Afton Station 2 Annapolis Royal 2 Athol Road 2 Aikens 2 Annapolis Valley 2 Athol Station 2 Ainslie Glen 4 Annapolis, Subd. A 2 Atkinson 2 Ainslie Point 4 Annapolis, Subd. B 2 Atlanta 2 Ainslieview 4 Annapolis, Subd. C 2 Atlantic 3 Alba 4 Annapolis, Subd. D 2 Atwood Brook 3 Alba Station 4 Antigonish 2 Atwoods Brook 3 Albany 2 Antigonish Harbour 2 Atwood's Brook 3 Albany Cross 2 Antigonish Landing 2 Atwoods Brook Station 3 Albany New 2 Antigonish, Subd. A 2 Auburn 2 Albert Bridge 4 Antigonish, Subd. B 2 Auburndale 3 Albro Lake 1 Antrim 1 Auld Cove 2 Alder Plains 3 Apple River 2 Aulds Cove 2 Alder Point 4 Arcadia 3 Avondale (Pictou, Subd. B) 2 Alder River 2 Archibald 2 Avondale (West Hants) 2 Alderney Point 4 Archibalds Mill 2 Avondale Station 2 Aldershot 2 Ardness 2 Avonport 2 Aldersville 3 Ardoise 2 Avonport Station 2 Alderwood Acres 1 Argyle 2 Aylesford 2 Alderwood Trailer Court 1 Argyle 3 Aylesford East 2 Allains Creek 2 Argyle Head 3 Aylesford Lake
    [Show full text]
  • Kings County, NS Regional Emergency Management Plan (REMP)
    Kings County, NS Regional Emergency Management Plan (REMP) September 2018 Table of Contents FOREWORD .......................................................................................................................................1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................2 1.1 Preface ....................................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Relevant Legislation................................................................................................................... 2 2.0 OBJECTIVES OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT .............................................................................6 2.1 Objective 1 – Assess Risks ......................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Objective 2 – Mitigate Risks ...................................................................................................... 6 2.3 Objective 3 – Plan for Response ................................................................................................ 7 2.4 Objective 4 – Plan for Recovery ................................................................................................ 7 2.5 Objective 5 – Ensure Preparedness ........................................................................................... 7 2.6 Objective 6 – Evaluate and Renew the Program ......................................................................
    [Show full text]