Scalarization of Horizonless Reflecting Stars

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Scalarization of Horizonless Reflecting Stars Physics Letters B 804 (2020) 135372 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Physics Letters B www.elsevier.com/locate/physletb Scalarization of horizonless reflecting stars: Neutral scalar fields non-minimally coupled to Maxwell fields Yan Peng School of Mathematical Sciences, Qufu Normal University, Qufu, Shandong 273165, China a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: We analyze condensation behaviors of neutral scalar fields outside horizonless reflecting stars in the Received 25 January 2020 Einstein-Maxwell-scalar gravity. It was known that minimally coupled neutral scalar fields cannot Received in revised form 26 February 2020 exist outside horizonless reflecting stars. In this work, we consider non-minimal couplings between Accepted 16 March 2020 scalar fields and Maxwell fields, which is included to aim to trigger formations of scalar hairs. We Available online 24 March 2020 analytically demonstrate that there is no hair theorem for small coupling parameters below a bound. For Editor: M. Trodden large coupling parameters above the bound, we numerically obtain regular scalar hairy configurations supported by horizonless reflecting stars. © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Funded by SCOAP3. 1. Introduction the context of scalar-tensor theories [51]. At present, lots of spon- taneous scalarization models were constructed in the background The recent observation of gravitational waves may provide a of black holes [52–60]. way to test the nature of astrophysical black holes [1–3]. In clas- As mentioned above, some candidate quantum-gravity models sical general relativity, one famous property of black holes is no suggested that quantum effects may prevent the formation of hori- hair theorem, which states that a nontrivial static scalar field can- zons and a reflecting wall may lay above the would-be horizon po- not exist in the exterior region of asymptotically flat black holes, sition [14–21]. Interestingly, it was found that neutral scalar field see references [4–11] and reviews [12,13]. However, some can- hairs cannot exist outside such horizonless reflecting stars (even didate quantum-gravity models suggested that, due to quantum the star is charged) [26]. When considering scalar-Gauss-Bonnet effects [14–18], the classical absorbing horizon should be replaced couplings, we showed that the coupling can lead to the formation by a reflecting surface [19–25]. Interestingly, no hair behaviors also of neutral scalar field hairs in the background of horizonless re- appear for such horizonless reflecting stars [26–38]. In particular, flecting stars [61]. In fact, black hole spontaneous scalarization is even for static scalar fields non-minimally coupled to the Ricci cur- a very universal property, which also can be induced by another vature, no hair theorem still holds in backgrounds of black holes type of non-minimal couplings between scalar fields and Maxwell and horizonless reflecting stars [39–44]. fields [62–67]. As a further step, it is very interesting to exam- Intriguingly, for static scalar fields non-minimally coupled to ine whether scalar-Maxwell couplings can trigger condensations of the Gauss-Bonnet invariant, scalar field hairs can exist outside neutral scalar fields outside horizonless reflecting stars. asymptotically flat black holes [45–48]. Spinning hairy black holes This work is organized as follows. We start by introducing a were also numerically obtained in the scalar-Gauss-Bonnet the- model with a neutral scalar field coupled to the Maxwell field in ory [49]. In addition, analytical formula of the scalar-Gauss-Bonnet the charged horizonless reflecting star spacetime. For small cou- coupling parameter was explored in [50]. These scalarization mod- pling parameters, the neutral scalar field cannot exist. In contrast, 2 for large coupling parameters, we get numerical solutions of scalar els are constructed by introducing an additional term f (ψ)RGB, 2 hairy horizonless reflecting stars. Main conclusions are presented where f (ψ) is a function of the scalar field ψ and RGB is the Gauss-Bonnet invariant. In the scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity, under in the last section. scalar perturbations, the bald black hole is thermodynamically un- stable and it may evolve into a hairy black hole [46,47]. This 2. Investigations on the coupling parameter between scalar fields and Maxwell fields intriguing mechanism of hair formations is usually called sponta- neous scalarization, which was found long ago for neutron stars in We take the Lagrange density with scalar fields non-minimally coupled to Maxwell fields in the asymptotically flat background. It E-mail address: [email protected]. is defined by the following expression [62–64] https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135372 0370-2693/© 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Funded by SCOAP3. 2 Y. Peng / Physics Letters B 804 (2020) 135372 ν 2 2 2 L = R −∇ ∇ν − μ ψ + f ()I. (1) 2M Q N(rpeak) = 1 − + > 0. (10) r r2 Here R is the scalar curvature. is the static neutral scalar field peak peak I = ρσ with mass μ. f () is a function coupled to Fρσ F . In the With (9) and (10), we get the relation 2 linearized regime, there is I =−Q and the general coupling r4 α Q 2 l(l + 1) function can be expressed as f () = 1 − α2, where α is the − − μ2 0. (11) r4 r2 model parameter describing coupling strength [62–64]. In the limit peak peak of α → 0, it returns to the usual Einstein-Maxwell-scalar gravity. According to the inequality (11), we deduce a bound on the The scalar field differential equation is coupling parameter f I 2 4 2 ∇ν∇ − 2 + = μ r + l(l + 1)r 2r4 + l(l + 1)r2 ν μ 0. (2) peak peak μ s s 2 α 2 2 Q Q The charged static spherically symmetric background is μ2(M + M2 − Q 2)4 + l(l + 1)(M + M2 − Q 2)2 2 > . (12) dr Q 2 ds2 =−N(r)dt2 + + r2(dθ 2 + sin2θdφ2). (3) N(r) If compact reflecting stars are surrounded with static neutral In the weak-field limit, the metric function N(r) is scalar hairs, the parameter α should be above the bound (12). In other words, we obtain a no hair theorem for small coupling pa- 2 2M Q rameters N(r) = 1 − + (4) r r2 μ2(M + M2 − Q 2)4 + l(l + 1)(M + M2 − Q 2)2 with M and Q representing the star mass and star charge respec- α . (13) Q 2 tively. We point out that this background metric is valid on the condition αψ 2 1 It implies that neutral massive static exterior scalar fields usually We take the scalar field decomposition cannot exist in cases of large field mass, large spherical harmonic index, large star mass or small star charge. In particular, for α = 0, imφ (r,θ,φ)= e Slm(θ)Rlm(r). (5) the no hair condition (13) always holds, which means that charged lm stars cannot support minimally coupled neutral scalar hairs. In the following, we numerically show that scalar hairs can be induced For simplicity, we label R (r) as ψ(r). With relations (2), (3), lm by large non-minimal coupling parameters satisfying (12). Q 2 (5) and I =− , we derive the ordinary differential equation [33, r4 68,69] 3. Neutral scalar field hairs non-minimally coupled to Maxwell fields 2 2 2 N α Q l(l + 1) μ ψ + ( + )ψ + ( − − )ψ = 0. (6) r N r4 N r2 N N We numerically solve the equation (6)together with boundary + conditions (7). Besides parameters rs, M, Q , l and α, we also need Here l is the spherical harmonic index and l(l 1) is the charac- initial values of ψ(rs) and ψ (rs) to integrate the equation. The re- teristic eigenvalue of the angular scalar eigenfunction Slm(θ). flecting condition of (7)gives the value ψ(rs) = 0. According to We label rs as the radial coordinate of the star surface. Since the symmetry ψ → kψ of equation (6), we firstly set ψ (r ) = 1 we focus on the compact star without a horizon, the star sur- s without loss of generality. Since the equation (6)also satisfies the face is outside the gravitational radius, which can be expressed symmetry r → γ r, μ → μ/γ , M → γ M, Q → γ Q , we use di- 2 2 as rs > M + M − Q . At the star surface, we take scalar re- mensionless parameters μrs, μM, μQ , l and α to describe the flecting surface boundary conditions ψ(rs) = 0. In the far region, system. For given values of μrs, μM, μQ and l, using standard the physical massive static scalar fields asymptotically behave as shooting methods, we search for the proper α with the vanishing →∞ ∼ 1 −μr ψ(r ) r e . So the scalar field satisfies bound-state condi- condition ψ(∞) = 0. The equation of motion of the scalar field is tions linear with respect to ψ and the solution is scale free. After getting numerical solutions, we modify the boundary condition ψ (rs) = 1 = ∞ = 2 2 ψ(rs) 0,ψ() 0. (7) so that αψ 1 holds. In this work, we take very small αψ sat- 2 −7 isfying αψ < 10 . According to boundary conditions (7), one concludes that the In the case of μrs = 2.7, μM = 1.5, μQ = 1.0 and l = 0, we function ψ(r) must possess (at least) one extremum point r = r peak choose various α to try to get the physical solution with ψ(∞) = = between the star surface r rs and spatial infinity.
Recommended publications
  • Pulsar Scattering, Lensing and Gravity Waves
    Introduction Convergent Plasma Lenses Gravity Waves Black Holes/Fuzzballs Summary Pulsar Scattering, Lensing and Gravity Waves Ue-Li Pen, Lindsay King, Latham Boyle CITA Feb 15, 2012 U. Pen Pulsar Scattering, Lensing and Gravity Waves Introduction Convergent Plasma Lenses Gravity Waves Black Holes/Fuzzballs Summary Overview I Pulsar Scattering I VLBI ISM holography, distance measures I Enhanced Pulsar Timing Array gravity waves I fuzzballs U. Pen Pulsar Scattering, Lensing and Gravity Waves Introduction Convergent Plasma Lenses Gravity Waves Black Holes/Fuzzballs Summary Pulsar Scattering I Pulsars scintillate strongly due to ISM propagation I Lens of geometric size ∼ AU I Can be imaged with VLBI (Brisken et al 2010) I Deconvolved by interstellar holography (Walker et al 2008) U. Pen Pulsar Scattering, Lensing and Gravity Waves Introduction Convergent Plasma Lenses Gravity Waves Black Holes/Fuzzballs Summary Scattering Image Data from Brisken et al, Holographic VLBI. U. Pen Pulsar Scattering, Lensing and Gravity Waves Introduction Convergent Plasma Lenses Gravity Waves Black Holes/Fuzzballs Summary ISM enigma −8 I Scattering angle observed mas, 10 rad. I Snell's law: sin(θ1)= sin(θ2) = n2=n1 −12 I n − 1 ∼ 10 . I 4 orders of magnitude mismatch. U. Pen Pulsar Scattering, Lensing and Gravity Waves Introduction Convergent Plasma Lenses Gravity Waves Black Holes/Fuzzballs Summary Possibilities I turbulent ISM: sum of many small scatters. Cannot explain discrete images. I confinement problem: super mini dark matter halos, cosmic strings? I Geometric alignment: Goldreich and Shridhar (2006) I Snell's law at grazing incidence: ∆α = (1 − n2=n1)/α I grazing incidence is geometry preferred at 2-D structures U.
    [Show full text]
  • A Conceptual Model for the Origin of the Cutoff Parameter in Exotic Compact Objects
    S S symmetry Article A Conceptual Model for the Origin of the Cutoff Parameter in Exotic Compact Objects Wilson Alexander Rojas Castillo 1 and Jose Robel Arenas Salazar 2,* 1 Departamento de Física, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá UN.11001, Colombia; [email protected] 2 Observatorio Astronómico Nacional, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá UN.11001, Colombia * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 30 October 2020; Accepted: 30 November 2020 ; Published: 14 December 2020 Abstract: A Black Hole (BH) is a spacetime region with a horizon and where geodesics converge to a singularity. At such a point, the gravitational field equations fail. As an alternative to the problem of the singularity arises the existence of Exotic Compact Objects (ECOs) that prevent the problem of the singularity through a transition phase of matter once it has crossed the horizon. ECOs are characterized by a closeness parameter or cutoff, e, which measures the degree of compactness of the object. This parameter is established as the difference between the radius of the ECO’s surface and the gravitational radius. Thus, different values of e correspond to different types of ECOs. If e is very big, the ECO behaves more like a star than a black hole. On the contrary, if e tends to a very small value, the ECO behaves like a black hole. It is considered a conceptual model of the origin of the cutoff for ECOs, when a dust shell contracts gravitationally from an initial position to near the Schwarzschild radius. This allowed us to find that the cutoff makes two types of contributions: a classical one governed by General Relativity and one of a quantum nature, if the ECO is very close to the horizon, when estimating that the maximum entropy is contained within the material that composes the shell.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief Overview of Research Areas in the OSU Physics Department
    A brief overview of research areas in the OSU Physics Department Physics Research Areas • Astrophysics & Cosmology • Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics • Biophysics • Cold Atom Physics (theory) • Condensed Matter Physics • High Energy Physics • Nuclear Physics • Physics Education Research (A Scientific Approach to Physics Education) Biophysics faculty Michael Poirier - Dongping Zhong - Ralf Bundschuh -Theory Experiment Experiment C. Jayaprakash - Theory Comert Kural (Biophysics since 2001) Experiment Biophysics Research Main theme: Molecular Mechanisms Behind Important Biological Functions Research areas: •chromosome structure and function •DNA repair •processing of genetic information •genetic regulatory networks •ultrafast protein dynamics •interaction of water with proteins •RNA structure and function Experimental Condensed Matter Physics Rolando Valdes Aguilar THz spectroscopy of quantum materials P. Chris Hammel Nanomagnetism and spin-electronics, high spatial resolution and high sensitivity scanned Roland Kawakami probe magnetic resonance imaging Spin-Based Electronics and Nanoscale Magnetism Leonard Brillson Semiconductor surfaces and interfaces, complex oxides, next generation electronics, high permittivity dielectrics, solar cells, biological Fengyuan Yang sensors Magnetism and magnetotransport in complex oxide epitaxial films; metallic multilayers; spin Jon Pelz dynamics/ transport in semiconductor nanowires Spatial and energy-resolved studies of contacts, deep-level defects, films and buried interfaces in oxides and semiconductors; spin injection Ezekiel Johnston-Halperin into semiconductors. Nanoscience, magnetism, spintronics, molecular/ organic electronics, complex oxides. Studies of Thomas Lemberger matter at nanoscopic length scales Magnetic and electronic properties of high temperature superconductors and other Jay Gupta oxides; thin film growth by coevaporation and LT UHV STM combined with optical probes; studies sputtering; single crystal growth. of interactions of atoms and molecules on surfaces structures built with atomic precision R.
    [Show full text]
  • Can We Observe Fuzzballs Or Firewalls?
    Can we observe fuzzballs or firewalls? Bin Guo1, Shaun Hampton2 and Samir D. Mathur3 Department of Physics The Ohio State University Columbus, OH 43210, USA Abstract In the fuzzball paradigm the information paradox is resolved because the black hole is replaced by an object with no horizon. One may therefore ask if observations can distinguish a traditional hole from a fuzzball. We find: (a) It is very difficult to reflect quanta off the surface of a fuzzball, mainly because geodesics starting near the horizon radius cannot escape to infinity unless their starting direction is very close to radial. (b) If infalling particles interact with the emerging radiation before they are engulfed by the horizon, then we say that we have a ‘firewall behavior’. We consider several types of interactions, but find no evidence for firewall behavior in any theory that obeys causality. (c) Photons with wavelengths larger than the black hole radius can be scattered off the emerging radiation, but a very small fraction of the backscattered photons will be able to escape back to infinity. arXiv:1711.01617v1 [hep-th] 5 Nov 2017 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 1 Introduction In the traditional picture of a black hole, all the mass resides at a central singularity, while the rest of spacetime is empty. In particular, the region around the horizon is in a vacuum state. But such a picture of the hole leads to the black hole information paradox [1]. In string theory, it appears that this paradox is avoided because the structure of the hole is radically different: the hole is described by a horizon sized fuzzball, with no horizon [2, 3].
    [Show full text]
  • The Magic Fermion Repelling Stringy Fuzzball Black Hole, the Origin of a Cyclic Raspberry Multiverse
    The Magic Fermion Repelling Stringy Fuzzball Black Hole, the origin of a Cyclic Raspberry Multiverse. Leo Vuyk, Architect, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Abstract, This consciousness theory of everything, also called Quantum FFF Theory, (FFF = Function Follows Form) is a semi classical theory based on a symmetrical Big Bang into 8 or 12 Charge Parity (CP) symmetric copy universes. However such a cyclic multiverse seems to be only possible with special ingredients, 1: a propeller shaped fermion able transform by collision and spin in two pitch directions. 2: A compact String knot based dark matter Fuzzball black hole with enough rigid string content, to become stable against the fierce oscillations of the oscillating vacuum lattice and repelling all spinning Fermions. but not other black hole nuclei or photons. As a result, The Quantum FFF Theory is a semi classical theory because it describes reality by the real collision and shape transformation processes of real sub quantum rigid stringy multiverse entangled particles. Each particle is supposed to be conscious by its entanglement with 8 or 12 CP symmetric copy particles located inside 8 or 12 Charge Parity (CP) symmetric universal bubbles at long distance in raspberry shape. Those particles are supposed to be based on only one original transformable ring shaped massless virgin particle called the Axion/Higgs particle assumed to be the product of the symmetric cyclic big bang nucleus as the creation of one symmetrical raspberry shaped multiverse equipped with an even number of material and anti material universal bubbles. The Quantum FFF theory is called Semi classical because in addition to the ring shaped transformable rigid string particles, all universal bubbles are assumed to be each others Charge Parity (CP) mirror symmetric universal bubbles which are assumed to be instant entangled down to each individual string particle created out of the Axion Higgs splitting cold Big Bang.
    [Show full text]
  • New Physics on the Horizon? Testing the Nature of Dark Compact Objects
    Copernicus Webinar – copernicuswebinar.com – Mar 2nd, 2021 New physics on the horizon? Testing the nature of dark compact o#$ects Credits: G. Raposo Kerr Fuzzball ,-ianchi+ PR/ 21012 Paolo Pani Sapienza University of Rome & INFN Roma1 There’s a crackhttps%//web.uniroma1.it/gm in everything – that’s how nthe li ht gets in. "eonard Cohen http://www.Dar"GRA.org -lack holes are now everywhere3 4hy testing the -5 picture? #. #ani $ New physics on the hori&on' Copernicus Webinar $ March 2021 4hy? Are there compact objects other than black holes and neutron stars? /I)6&7irgo mass8gap events? Supermassive BH seeds? 9(ar") matter compact o#$ects? (e'g' #oson/a;ion stars: #. #ani $ New physics on the hori&on' Copernicus Webinar $ March 2021 4hy? Are there compact objects other than black holes and neutron stars? /I)6&7irgo mass8gap events? Supermassive BH seeds? 9(ar") matter compact o#$ects? (e'g' #oson/a;ion stars: Observational signatures of quantum BHs? 9if not now, when': Information loss, singularities, +a chy horizons… New physics at the horizon (e'g' >rewalls, nonlocality: ,*lmheri.< Gi!!ings.< 01108011?2 Regular< horizonless compact o#$ects (e'g' f zz#alls) ,Math r.< -ena.< -ianchi.< Gi sto.< =2 #. #ani $ New physics on the hori&on' Copernicus Webinar $ March 2021 4hy? Are there compact objects other than black holes and neutron stars? /I)6&7irgo mass8gap events? Supermassive BH seeds? 9(ar") matter compact o#$ects? (e'g' #oson/a;ion stars: Observational signatures of quantum BHs? 9if not now, when': Information loss, singularities, +a chy horizons… New physics at the horizon (e'g' >rewalls, nonlocality: ,*lmheri.< Gi!!ings.< 01108011?2 Regular< horizonless compact o#$ects (e'g' f zz#alls) ,Math r.< -ena.< -ianchi.< Gi sto.< =2 uantifying the "BH#ness” across mass ranges 9e.g' -ayesian mo!el selection: #.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2007.01743V3 [Hep-Th] 28 Oct 2020 Scale Is the Essence of the Fuzzball Proposal [32–35]
    Distinguishing fuzzballs from black holes through their multipolar structure Massimo Bianchi1, Dario Consoli2, Alfredo Grillo1, Jos`eFrancisco Morales1, Paolo Pani3, Guilherme Raposo3 1 Dipartimento di Fisica, Universit`adi Roma \Tor Vergata" & Sezione INFN Roma2, Via della ricerca scientifica 1, 00133, Roma, Italy 2 Mathematical Physics Group, University of Vienna, Boltzmanngasse 5 1090 Vienna, Austria and 3 Dipartimento di Fisica, \Sapienza" Universit`adi Roma & Sezione INFN Roma1, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185, Roma, Italy Within General Relativity, the unique stationary solution of an isolated black hole is the Kerr spacetime, which has a peculiar multipolar structure depending only on its mass and spin. We develop a general method to extract the multipole moments of arbitrary stationary spacetimes and apply it to a large family of horizonless microstate geometries. The latter can break the axial and equatorial symmetry of the Kerr metric and have a much richer multipolar structure, which provides a portal to constrain fuzzball models phenomenologically. We find numerical evidence that all multipole moments are typically larger (in absolute value) than those of a Kerr black hole with the same mass and spin. Current measurements of the quadrupole moment of black-hole candidates could place only mild constraints on fuzzballs, while future gravitational-wave detections of extreme mass-ratio inspirals with the space mission LISA will improve these bounds by orders of magnitude. Introduction. Owing to the black-hole (BH) uniqueness serving as a genuine strong-gravity test of Einstein's grav- and no-hair theorems [1, 2] (see also Refs. [3{5]), within ity [10{16], along with other proposed observational tests General Relativity (GR) any stationary BH in isolation of fuzzballs (see, e.g., Refs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Discovery Potential of Space-Based Gravitational Wave Astronomy
    Astro2020 Science White Paper The Discovery Potential of Space-Based Gravitational Wave Astronomy Thematic Areas: Planetary Systems Star and Planet Formation Formation and Evolution of Compact Objects Cosmology and Fundamental Physics Stars and Stellar Evolution Resolved Stellar Populations and their Environments Galaxy Evolution Multi-Messenger Astronomy and Astrophysics Principal Author: Name: Neil Cornish Institution: eXtreme Gravity Institute, Department of Physics, Montana State University Email: [email protected] Phone: 1 (406) 994 7986 Co-authors: Emanuele Berti, Physics & Astronomy, Johns Hopkins University Kelly Holley-Bockelmann, Astronomy, Vanderbuilt University Shane Larson, Physics & Astronomy, Northwestern Sean McWilliams, Physics & Astronomy, West Virginia University Guido Mueller, Physics, University of Florida Priya Natarajan, Astronomy, Yale University Michele Vallisneri, Physics, Caltech Abstract : A space-based interferometer operating in the previously unexplored mHz gravitational band has tremendous discovery potential. If history is any guide, the opening of a new spectral band will lead to the discovery of entirely new sources and phenomena. The mHz band is ideally suited to exploring beyond standard model processes in the early universe, and with the sensitivities that can be reached with current technologies, the discovery space for exotic astrophysical systems is vast. 1 Introduction: A gigameter scale space-based gravitational wave detector will open up four decades of the gravi- tational wave spectrum
    [Show full text]
  • Planet Zog: Background Briefing and First Data Release the Planet Zog
    ASTR1001 Planet Zog: Background Briefing and First Data Release The Planet Zog Imagine that you live on the distant planet Zog: far away in a space-time very different from our own. Zog is very much like the Earth: you have a technology virtually identical to our own. All the laws of Physics, as you measure them in the Zoggian laboratories, seem identical to the laws we measure on Earth. The one thing that is very different is the night sky... The stars look similar to Earth’s, but there is no Milky Way. Instead, north Zog astronomers see the awesome sight of the Greater Milkstain With its brilliant off- centre blue spot. Southern hemisphere Zog astronomers see the equally brilliant southern blue spot. Recent Bubble Space Telescope observations have shown that the southern blue spot also has an off-centre milkstain associated with it. But the Southern Milk Stain is very very much smaller and fainter than its northern counterpart. Celestial Coordinates. The two blue spots are diametrically opposite on the sky (and hence can never both be seen at the same time, except by astronauts). They are used as the origin of the celestial coordinate system: Declination: +90 for northern blue spot, Both milkstains 0 for the celestial extend away from equator. the two blue spots in the same direction (though Right Ascension: 0 to the GMS extends 360. Zero axis is along the long axis of the two further). milkstains. The Milkstains The Greater Milkstain (GMS) has been known for centuries to break up into literally millions of stars when viewed with even a pair of binoculars.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1908.06042V4 [Astro-Ph.SR] 21 Jan 2020 Which Are Born on the Interface Between the Tachocline and the Overshoot Layer, Are Developed
    Thermomagnetic Ettingshausen-Nernst effect in tachocline, magnetic reconnection phenomenon in lower layers, axion mechanism of solar luminosity variations, coronal heating problem solution and mechanism of asymmetric dark matter variations around black hole V.D. Rusov1,∗ M.V. Eingorn2, I.V. Sharph1, V.P. Smolyar1, M.E. Beglaryan3 1Department of Theoretical and Experimental Nuclear Physics, Odessa National Polytechnic University, Odessa, Ukraine 2CREST and NASA Research Centers, North Carolina Central University, Durham, North Carolina, U.S.A. 3Department of Computer Technology and Applied Mathematics, Kuban State University, Krasnodar, Russia Abstract It is shown that the holographic principle of quantum gravity (in the hologram of the Uni- verse, and therefore in our Galaxy, and of course on the Sun!), in which the conflict between the theory of gravitation and quantum mechanics disappears, gives rise to the Babcock-Leighton holographic mechanism. Unlike the solar dynamo models, it generates a strong toroidal mag- netic field by means of the thermomagnetic Ettingshausen-Nernst (EN) effect in the tachocline. Hence, it can be shown that with the help of the thermomagnetic EN effect, a simple estimate of the magnetic pressure of an ideal gas in the tachocline of e.g. the Sun can indirectly prove that by using the holographic principle of quantum gravity, the repulsive toroidal magnetic field Sun 7 Sun of the tachocline (Btacho = 4:1 · 10 G = −Bcore) precisely \neutralizes" the magnetic field in the Sun core, since the projections of the magnetic fields in the tachocline and the core have equal values but opposite directions. The basic problem is a generalized problem of the antidy- namo model of magnetic flux tubes (MFTs), where the nature of both holographic effects (the thermomagnetic EN effect and Babcock-Leighton holographic mechanism), including magnetic cycles, manifests itself in the modulation of asymmetric dark matter (ADM) and, consequently, the solar axion in the Sun interior.
    [Show full text]
  • Where Does the Physics of Extreme Gravitational Collapse Reside?
    universe Review Where Does the Physics of Extreme Gravitational Collapse Reside? Carlos Barceló 1,*, Raúl Carballo-Rubio 1 and Luis J. Garay 2,3 1 Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía (IAA-CSIC), Glorieta de la Astronomía, 18008 Granada, Spain; [email protected] 2 Departamento de Física Teórica II, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain; [email protected] 3 Instituto de Estructura de la Materia (IEM-CSIC), Serrano 121, 28006 Madrid, Spain * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +34-958-121-311 Academic Editor: Gonzalo J. Olmo Received: 20 October 2015; Accepted: 3 May 2016; Published: 13 May 2016 Abstract: The gravitational collapse of massive stars serves to manifest the most severe deviations of general relativity with respect to Newtonian gravity: the formation of horizons and spacetime singularities. Both features have proven to be catalysts of deep physical developments, especially when combined with the principles of quantum mechanics. Nonetheless, it is seldom remarked that it is hardly possible to combine all these developments into a unified theoretical model, while maintaining reasonable prospects for the independent experimental corroboration of its different parts. In this paper we review the current theoretical understanding of the physics of gravitational collapse in order to highlight this tension, stating the position that the standard view on evaporating black holes stands for. This serves as the motivation for the discussion of a recent proposal that offers the opposite perspective, represented by a set of geometries that regularize the classical singular behavior and present modifications of the near-horizon Schwarzschild geometry as the result of the propagation of non-perturbative ultraviolet effects originated in regions of high curvature.
    [Show full text]
  • MATTERS of GRAVITY Contents
    MATTERS OF GRAVITY The newsletter of the Topical Group on Gravitation of the American Physical Society Number 40 Fall 2012 Contents GGR News: we hear that . , by David Garfinkle ..................... 4 100 years ago, by David Garfinkle ...................... 4 New publisher and new book, by Vesselin Petkov .............. 4 Research briefs: Dark Matter News, by Katherine Freese ................... 5 LARES satellite, by Richard Matzner .................... 8 Conference reports: Workshop on Gravitational Wave Bursts, by Pablo Laguna ......... 11 JoshFest, by Ed Glass ............................ 13 Electromagnetic and Gravitational Wave Astronomy, by Sean McWilliams . 14 Bits, Branes, and Black Holes, by Ted Jacobson and Don Marolf ...... 15 1 Editor David Garfinkle Department of Physics Oakland University Rochester, MI 48309 Phone: (248) 370-3411 Internet: garfinkl-at-oakland.edu WWW: http://www.oakland.edu/?id=10223&sid=249#garfinkle Associate Editor Greg Comer Department of Physics and Center for Fluids at All Scales, St. Louis University, St. Louis, MO 63103 Phone: (314) 977-8432 Internet: comergl-at-slu.edu WWW: http://www.slu.edu/colleges/AS/physics/profs/comer.html ISSN: 1527-3431 DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed in the articles of this newsletter represent the views of the authors and are not necessarily the views of APS. The articles in this newsletter are not peer reviewed. 2 Editorial The next newsletter is due February 1st. This and all subsequent issues will be available on the web at https://files.oakland.edu/users/garfinkl/web/mog/ All issues before number 28 are available at http://www.phys.lsu.edu/mog Any ideas for topics that should be covered by the newsletter, should be emailed to me, or Greg Comer, or the relevant correspondent.
    [Show full text]