DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:2007.01743V3 [Hep-Th] 28 Oct 2020 Scale Is the Essence of the Fuzzball Proposal [32–35]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:2007.01743V3 [Hep-Th] 28 Oct 2020 Scale Is the Essence of the Fuzzball Proposal [32–35] Distinguishing fuzzballs from black holes through their multipolar structure Massimo Bianchi1, Dario Consoli2, Alfredo Grillo1, Jos`eFrancisco Morales1, Paolo Pani3, Guilherme Raposo3 1 Dipartimento di Fisica, Universit`adi Roma \Tor Vergata" & Sezione INFN Roma2, Via della ricerca scientifica 1, 00133, Roma, Italy 2 Mathematical Physics Group, University of Vienna, Boltzmanngasse 5 1090 Vienna, Austria and 3 Dipartimento di Fisica, \Sapienza" Universit`adi Roma & Sezione INFN Roma1, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185, Roma, Italy Within General Relativity, the unique stationary solution of an isolated black hole is the Kerr spacetime, which has a peculiar multipolar structure depending only on its mass and spin. We develop a general method to extract the multipole moments of arbitrary stationary spacetimes and apply it to a large family of horizonless microstate geometries. The latter can break the axial and equatorial symmetry of the Kerr metric and have a much richer multipolar structure, which provides a portal to constrain fuzzball models phenomenologically. We find numerical evidence that all multipole moments are typically larger (in absolute value) than those of a Kerr black hole with the same mass and spin. Current measurements of the quadrupole moment of black-hole candidates could place only mild constraints on fuzzballs, while future gravitational-wave detections of extreme mass-ratio inspirals with the space mission LISA will improve these bounds by orders of magnitude. Introduction. Owing to the black-hole (BH) uniqueness serving as a genuine strong-gravity test of Einstein's grav- and no-hair theorems [1, 2] (see also Refs. [3{5]), within ity [10{16], along with other proposed observational tests General Relativity (GR) any stationary BH in isolation of fuzzballs (see, e.g., Refs. [17, 18]). In this context is also axisymmetric and its multipole moments1 satisfy it is intriguing that current gravitational-wave (GW) an elegant relation [6], observations (especially the recent GW190814 [19] and GW190521 [20, 21]) do not exclude the existence of ex- BH BH `+1 ` M` + iS` = M (iχ) ; (1) otic compact objects other than BHs and neutron stars. In GR, BHs have curvature singularities that are con- where M (S ) are the Geroch-Hansen mass (current) ` ` jectured to be always covered by event horizons [22{24]. multipole moments [6, 7], the suffix \BH" refers to the At the quantum level, BHs behave as thermodynamical BH metric, M = M is the mass, χ ≡ J =M2 the di- 0 systems with the area of the event horizon and its surface mensionless spin, and J = S the angular momentum 1 gravity playing the role of the entropy and temperature, (we use natural units throughout). Equation (1) implies respectively [25, 26]. In fact a BH can evaporate emitting that all Kerr moments with ` ≥ 2 can be written only Hawking radiation [27]. This gives rise to a number of in terms of the mass M and angular momentum J of paradoxes that can be addressed in a consistent quantum the spacetime. Introducing the dimensionless quantities `+1 `+1 theory of gravity such as string theory [28]. M` ≡ M`=M and S` ≡ S`=M , the nonvanishing moments are For special classes of extremal (charged BPS) BHs [29{ 31] one can precisely count the microstates that account BH n 2n BH n 2n+1 M2n = (−1) χ ; S2n+1 = (−1) χ (2) for the BH entropy. In some cases, one can even iden- tify smooth horizonless geometries with the same mass, for n = 0; 1; 2; :::. The fact that M` = 0 (S` = 0) when ` charges, and angular momentum as the corresponding is odd (even) is a consequence of the equatorial symmetry BH. These geometries represent some of the microstates of the Kerr metric. Likewise, the fact that all multipoles in the low-energy (super)gravity description. The exis- with ` ≥ 2 are proportional to (powers of) the spin { as tence of a nontrivial structure at the putative horizon well as their specific spin dependence { is a peculiarity arXiv:2007.01743v3 [hep-th] 28 Oct 2020 scale is the essence of the fuzzball proposal [32{35]. In of the Kerr metric, that is lost for other compact-object the latter, many properties of BHs in GR emerge from an solutions in GR [8, 9] and also for BH solutions in other averaging procedure over a large number of microstates, gravitational theories. or as a `collective behavior' of fuzzballs [36{40]. So far Testing whether these properties hold for an astrophys- it has been hard to find a statistically significant frac- ical dark object provides an opportunity to perform mul- tion of microstate geometries both for five-dimensional tiple null-hypothesis tests of the Kerr metric { for ex- (3-charge) and for four-dimensional (4-charge) BPS BHs. ample by measuring independently three multipole mo- Yet, several classes of solutions based on a multicenter ments such as the mass, spin, and mass quadrupole M2 { ansatz [41{46] have been found and their string theory origin uncovered [47{49]. Although in viable astrophysical scenarios BHs are ex- 1 For a generic spacetime the multipole moments of order ` are pected to be neutral, charged BPS BHs are a useful toy rank-` tensors, which reduce to scalar quantities, M` and S`, in model to explore the properties of their microstates. Ex- the axisymmetric case. See below for the general definition. tending the fuzzball proposal to neutral, non-BPS, BHs 2 3 in four dimensions and finding predictions that can be ob- reduce to the scalars M` ≡ M`0 and S` ≡ S`0. The servationally tested so as to distinguish this from other same holds for more general axisymmetric metrics. proposals and from the standard BH picture in GR [16] Here we consider fuzzball solutions of gravity in four remain an open challenge. dimensions minimally coupled to four Maxwell fields and In this letter and in a companion paper [50], we investi- three complex scalars. A general class of extremal solu- gate the differences in the multipolar structure between tions of the Einstein-Maxwell system is described by a BHs and fuzzballs. As we shall argue, already at the metric of the form [53{55] level of the quadrupole moments the nonaxisymmetric 3 geometry of generic microstates in the four-dimensional 2 X ds2 = −e2U (dt + w) + e−2U dx2; (7) fuzzball model leads to a much richer phenomenology and i to potentially detectable deviations from GR. i=1 Setup. Our method is based on Thorne's seminal work with on the multipole moments of a stationary isolated ob- 3 1 X ject [51]. The idea is to choose a suitable coordinate e−4U = L L L V − K1 K2 K3 M + KI KJ L L 1 2 3 2 I J system { so called asymptotically Cartesian mass cen- I>J tered (ACMC) { whereby the mass and current multipole 3 3 MV X 1 1 X moments can be directly extracted from a multipolar ex- − KI L − M 2V 2 − (KI L )2 ; 2 I 4 4 I pansion of the metric components. In an ACMC system, I=1 I=1 the metric of a stationary asymptotically flat object can 1 ∗ dw = V dM − MdV + KI dL − L dKI ; (8) be written as [50] 3 2 I I 2 2 2 where ∗ is the Hodge dual in 3-dimensional flat space, ds = −(1 − c00)dt + c0i dt dxi + (1 + c00) dxi + ::: (3) 3 I fV; LI ;K ;Mg are eight harmonic functions associated with xi = fx; y; zg, and c00 and c0i admitting a spherical- with the four electric and four magnetic charges, and harmonic expansion2 of the form [51] I;J = 1; 2; 3. Fuzzball solutions are obtained by distributing the 1 ` r X X 1 4π charges of the eight harmonic functions among N centers c = 2 (M Y + `0 < `) (4) 00 r1+` 2` + 1 `m `m in such a way that the geometry near each center lifts to `=0 m=−` a regular five-dimensional geometry. More explicitly, we 1 ` s take X X 1 4π(` + 1) c = 2 S Y B + `0 < ` 0i r1+` `(2` + 1) `m i;`m N N `=1 m=−` X va X ma V = v0 + ;M = m0 + ra ra B a=1 a=1 in terms of the scalar (Ylm) and axial vector (Yi;`m) spher- N I N ical harmonics. The expansion coefficients M and S X k X `I;a `m `m KI = kI + a ;L = ` + (9) are the mass and current multipole moments of the space- 0 r I I;0 r a=1 a a=1 a time, respectively. They can be conveniently packed into a single complex harmonic function with ra = jx − xaj the distance from the a-th center. Results. Comparing the metric (7) with the definition 1 ` r X X 1 4π of an ACMC metric (3), one can extract the multipole H = (M + iS ) Y : (5) r1+` 2` + 1 `m `m `m moments of the fuzzball solution (details are given in `=0 m=−` Ref. [50]). The fuzzball multipole moments are encoded in the multipole harmonic function In the case of the Kerr metric, H is simply given by N " 3 # 1 X X M H = V + iM + (L − i KI ) : (10) HKerr = q (6) 4 I 2 2 J 2 a=1 I=1 x1 + x2 + x3 − i M This complex harmonic function is a generalization of with two centers at positions z = ±J =M along the z- the Kerr case [Eq. (6)], the latter can be interpreted as axis. The harmonic expansion of Eq. (6) does not contain a two-center solution, with the Schwarzschild case cor- m 6= 0 terms, so that for each ` the moment tensors responding to a single center.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pulsar Scattering, Lensing and Gravity Waves
    Introduction Convergent Plasma Lenses Gravity Waves Black Holes/Fuzzballs Summary Pulsar Scattering, Lensing and Gravity Waves Ue-Li Pen, Lindsay King, Latham Boyle CITA Feb 15, 2012 U. Pen Pulsar Scattering, Lensing and Gravity Waves Introduction Convergent Plasma Lenses Gravity Waves Black Holes/Fuzzballs Summary Overview I Pulsar Scattering I VLBI ISM holography, distance measures I Enhanced Pulsar Timing Array gravity waves I fuzzballs U. Pen Pulsar Scattering, Lensing and Gravity Waves Introduction Convergent Plasma Lenses Gravity Waves Black Holes/Fuzzballs Summary Pulsar Scattering I Pulsars scintillate strongly due to ISM propagation I Lens of geometric size ∼ AU I Can be imaged with VLBI (Brisken et al 2010) I Deconvolved by interstellar holography (Walker et al 2008) U. Pen Pulsar Scattering, Lensing and Gravity Waves Introduction Convergent Plasma Lenses Gravity Waves Black Holes/Fuzzballs Summary Scattering Image Data from Brisken et al, Holographic VLBI. U. Pen Pulsar Scattering, Lensing and Gravity Waves Introduction Convergent Plasma Lenses Gravity Waves Black Holes/Fuzzballs Summary ISM enigma −8 I Scattering angle observed mas, 10 rad. I Snell's law: sin(θ1)= sin(θ2) = n2=n1 −12 I n − 1 ∼ 10 . I 4 orders of magnitude mismatch. U. Pen Pulsar Scattering, Lensing and Gravity Waves Introduction Convergent Plasma Lenses Gravity Waves Black Holes/Fuzzballs Summary Possibilities I turbulent ISM: sum of many small scatters. Cannot explain discrete images. I confinement problem: super mini dark matter halos, cosmic strings? I Geometric alignment: Goldreich and Shridhar (2006) I Snell's law at grazing incidence: ∆α = (1 − n2=n1)/α I grazing incidence is geometry preferred at 2-D structures U.
    [Show full text]
  • A Conceptual Model for the Origin of the Cutoff Parameter in Exotic Compact Objects
    S S symmetry Article A Conceptual Model for the Origin of the Cutoff Parameter in Exotic Compact Objects Wilson Alexander Rojas Castillo 1 and Jose Robel Arenas Salazar 2,* 1 Departamento de Física, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá UN.11001, Colombia; [email protected] 2 Observatorio Astronómico Nacional, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá UN.11001, Colombia * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 30 October 2020; Accepted: 30 November 2020 ; Published: 14 December 2020 Abstract: A Black Hole (BH) is a spacetime region with a horizon and where geodesics converge to a singularity. At such a point, the gravitational field equations fail. As an alternative to the problem of the singularity arises the existence of Exotic Compact Objects (ECOs) that prevent the problem of the singularity through a transition phase of matter once it has crossed the horizon. ECOs are characterized by a closeness parameter or cutoff, e, which measures the degree of compactness of the object. This parameter is established as the difference between the radius of the ECO’s surface and the gravitational radius. Thus, different values of e correspond to different types of ECOs. If e is very big, the ECO behaves more like a star than a black hole. On the contrary, if e tends to a very small value, the ECO behaves like a black hole. It is considered a conceptual model of the origin of the cutoff for ECOs, when a dust shell contracts gravitationally from an initial position to near the Schwarzschild radius. This allowed us to find that the cutoff makes two types of contributions: a classical one governed by General Relativity and one of a quantum nature, if the ECO is very close to the horizon, when estimating that the maximum entropy is contained within the material that composes the shell.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief Overview of Research Areas in the OSU Physics Department
    A brief overview of research areas in the OSU Physics Department Physics Research Areas • Astrophysics & Cosmology • Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics • Biophysics • Cold Atom Physics (theory) • Condensed Matter Physics • High Energy Physics • Nuclear Physics • Physics Education Research (A Scientific Approach to Physics Education) Biophysics faculty Michael Poirier - Dongping Zhong - Ralf Bundschuh -Theory Experiment Experiment C. Jayaprakash - Theory Comert Kural (Biophysics since 2001) Experiment Biophysics Research Main theme: Molecular Mechanisms Behind Important Biological Functions Research areas: •chromosome structure and function •DNA repair •processing of genetic information •genetic regulatory networks •ultrafast protein dynamics •interaction of water with proteins •RNA structure and function Experimental Condensed Matter Physics Rolando Valdes Aguilar THz spectroscopy of quantum materials P. Chris Hammel Nanomagnetism and spin-electronics, high spatial resolution and high sensitivity scanned Roland Kawakami probe magnetic resonance imaging Spin-Based Electronics and Nanoscale Magnetism Leonard Brillson Semiconductor surfaces and interfaces, complex oxides, next generation electronics, high permittivity dielectrics, solar cells, biological Fengyuan Yang sensors Magnetism and magnetotransport in complex oxide epitaxial films; metallic multilayers; spin Jon Pelz dynamics/ transport in semiconductor nanowires Spatial and energy-resolved studies of contacts, deep-level defects, films and buried interfaces in oxides and semiconductors; spin injection Ezekiel Johnston-Halperin into semiconductors. Nanoscience, magnetism, spintronics, molecular/ organic electronics, complex oxides. Studies of Thomas Lemberger matter at nanoscopic length scales Magnetic and electronic properties of high temperature superconductors and other Jay Gupta oxides; thin film growth by coevaporation and LT UHV STM combined with optical probes; studies sputtering; single crystal growth. of interactions of atoms and molecules on surfaces structures built with atomic precision R.
    [Show full text]
  • Can We Observe Fuzzballs Or Firewalls?
    Can we observe fuzzballs or firewalls? Bin Guo1, Shaun Hampton2 and Samir D. Mathur3 Department of Physics The Ohio State University Columbus, OH 43210, USA Abstract In the fuzzball paradigm the information paradox is resolved because the black hole is replaced by an object with no horizon. One may therefore ask if observations can distinguish a traditional hole from a fuzzball. We find: (a) It is very difficult to reflect quanta off the surface of a fuzzball, mainly because geodesics starting near the horizon radius cannot escape to infinity unless their starting direction is very close to radial. (b) If infalling particles interact with the emerging radiation before they are engulfed by the horizon, then we say that we have a ‘firewall behavior’. We consider several types of interactions, but find no evidence for firewall behavior in any theory that obeys causality. (c) Photons with wavelengths larger than the black hole radius can be scattered off the emerging radiation, but a very small fraction of the backscattered photons will be able to escape back to infinity. arXiv:1711.01617v1 [hep-th] 5 Nov 2017 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 1 Introduction In the traditional picture of a black hole, all the mass resides at a central singularity, while the rest of spacetime is empty. In particular, the region around the horizon is in a vacuum state. But such a picture of the hole leads to the black hole information paradox [1]. In string theory, it appears that this paradox is avoided because the structure of the hole is radically different: the hole is described by a horizon sized fuzzball, with no horizon [2, 3].
    [Show full text]
  • The Magic Fermion Repelling Stringy Fuzzball Black Hole, the Origin of a Cyclic Raspberry Multiverse
    The Magic Fermion Repelling Stringy Fuzzball Black Hole, the origin of a Cyclic Raspberry Multiverse. Leo Vuyk, Architect, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Abstract, This consciousness theory of everything, also called Quantum FFF Theory, (FFF = Function Follows Form) is a semi classical theory based on a symmetrical Big Bang into 8 or 12 Charge Parity (CP) symmetric copy universes. However such a cyclic multiverse seems to be only possible with special ingredients, 1: a propeller shaped fermion able transform by collision and spin in two pitch directions. 2: A compact String knot based dark matter Fuzzball black hole with enough rigid string content, to become stable against the fierce oscillations of the oscillating vacuum lattice and repelling all spinning Fermions. but not other black hole nuclei or photons. As a result, The Quantum FFF Theory is a semi classical theory because it describes reality by the real collision and shape transformation processes of real sub quantum rigid stringy multiverse entangled particles. Each particle is supposed to be conscious by its entanglement with 8 or 12 CP symmetric copy particles located inside 8 or 12 Charge Parity (CP) symmetric universal bubbles at long distance in raspberry shape. Those particles are supposed to be based on only one original transformable ring shaped massless virgin particle called the Axion/Higgs particle assumed to be the product of the symmetric cyclic big bang nucleus as the creation of one symmetrical raspberry shaped multiverse equipped with an even number of material and anti material universal bubbles. The Quantum FFF theory is called Semi classical because in addition to the ring shaped transformable rigid string particles, all universal bubbles are assumed to be each others Charge Parity (CP) mirror symmetric universal bubbles which are assumed to be instant entangled down to each individual string particle created out of the Axion Higgs splitting cold Big Bang.
    [Show full text]
  • New Physics on the Horizon? Testing the Nature of Dark Compact Objects
    Copernicus Webinar – copernicuswebinar.com – Mar 2nd, 2021 New physics on the horizon? Testing the nature of dark compact o#$ects Credits: G. Raposo Kerr Fuzzball ,-ianchi+ PR/ 21012 Paolo Pani Sapienza University of Rome & INFN Roma1 There’s a crackhttps%//web.uniroma1.it/gm in everything – that’s how nthe li ht gets in. "eonard Cohen http://www.Dar"GRA.org -lack holes are now everywhere3 4hy testing the -5 picture? #. #ani $ New physics on the hori&on' Copernicus Webinar $ March 2021 4hy? Are there compact objects other than black holes and neutron stars? /I)6&7irgo mass8gap events? Supermassive BH seeds? 9(ar") matter compact o#$ects? (e'g' #oson/a;ion stars: #. #ani $ New physics on the hori&on' Copernicus Webinar $ March 2021 4hy? Are there compact objects other than black holes and neutron stars? /I)6&7irgo mass8gap events? Supermassive BH seeds? 9(ar") matter compact o#$ects? (e'g' #oson/a;ion stars: Observational signatures of quantum BHs? 9if not now, when': Information loss, singularities, +a chy horizons… New physics at the horizon (e'g' >rewalls, nonlocality: ,*lmheri.< Gi!!ings.< 01108011?2 Regular< horizonless compact o#$ects (e'g' f zz#alls) ,Math r.< -ena.< -ianchi.< Gi sto.< =2 #. #ani $ New physics on the hori&on' Copernicus Webinar $ March 2021 4hy? Are there compact objects other than black holes and neutron stars? /I)6&7irgo mass8gap events? Supermassive BH seeds? 9(ar") matter compact o#$ects? (e'g' #oson/a;ion stars: Observational signatures of quantum BHs? 9if not now, when': Information loss, singularities, +a chy horizons… New physics at the horizon (e'g' >rewalls, nonlocality: ,*lmheri.< Gi!!ings.< 01108011?2 Regular< horizonless compact o#$ects (e'g' f zz#alls) ,Math r.< -ena.< -ianchi.< Gi sto.< =2 uantifying the "BH#ness” across mass ranges 9e.g' -ayesian mo!el selection: #.
    [Show full text]
  • The Discovery Potential of Space-Based Gravitational Wave Astronomy
    Astro2020 Science White Paper The Discovery Potential of Space-Based Gravitational Wave Astronomy Thematic Areas: Planetary Systems Star and Planet Formation Formation and Evolution of Compact Objects Cosmology and Fundamental Physics Stars and Stellar Evolution Resolved Stellar Populations and their Environments Galaxy Evolution Multi-Messenger Astronomy and Astrophysics Principal Author: Name: Neil Cornish Institution: eXtreme Gravity Institute, Department of Physics, Montana State University Email: [email protected] Phone: 1 (406) 994 7986 Co-authors: Emanuele Berti, Physics & Astronomy, Johns Hopkins University Kelly Holley-Bockelmann, Astronomy, Vanderbuilt University Shane Larson, Physics & Astronomy, Northwestern Sean McWilliams, Physics & Astronomy, West Virginia University Guido Mueller, Physics, University of Florida Priya Natarajan, Astronomy, Yale University Michele Vallisneri, Physics, Caltech Abstract : A space-based interferometer operating in the previously unexplored mHz gravitational band has tremendous discovery potential. If history is any guide, the opening of a new spectral band will lead to the discovery of entirely new sources and phenomena. The mHz band is ideally suited to exploring beyond standard model processes in the early universe, and with the sensitivities that can be reached with current technologies, the discovery space for exotic astrophysical systems is vast. 1 Introduction: A gigameter scale space-based gravitational wave detector will open up four decades of the gravi- tational wave spectrum
    [Show full text]
  • Planet Zog: Background Briefing and First Data Release the Planet Zog
    ASTR1001 Planet Zog: Background Briefing and First Data Release The Planet Zog Imagine that you live on the distant planet Zog: far away in a space-time very different from our own. Zog is very much like the Earth: you have a technology virtually identical to our own. All the laws of Physics, as you measure them in the Zoggian laboratories, seem identical to the laws we measure on Earth. The one thing that is very different is the night sky... The stars look similar to Earth’s, but there is no Milky Way. Instead, north Zog astronomers see the awesome sight of the Greater Milkstain With its brilliant off- centre blue spot. Southern hemisphere Zog astronomers see the equally brilliant southern blue spot. Recent Bubble Space Telescope observations have shown that the southern blue spot also has an off-centre milkstain associated with it. But the Southern Milk Stain is very very much smaller and fainter than its northern counterpart. Celestial Coordinates. The two blue spots are diametrically opposite on the sky (and hence can never both be seen at the same time, except by astronauts). They are used as the origin of the celestial coordinate system: Declination: +90 for northern blue spot, Both milkstains 0 for the celestial extend away from equator. the two blue spots in the same direction (though Right Ascension: 0 to the GMS extends 360. Zero axis is along the long axis of the two further). milkstains. The Milkstains The Greater Milkstain (GMS) has been known for centuries to break up into literally millions of stars when viewed with even a pair of binoculars.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1908.06042V4 [Astro-Ph.SR] 21 Jan 2020 Which Are Born on the Interface Between the Tachocline and the Overshoot Layer, Are Developed
    Thermomagnetic Ettingshausen-Nernst effect in tachocline, magnetic reconnection phenomenon in lower layers, axion mechanism of solar luminosity variations, coronal heating problem solution and mechanism of asymmetric dark matter variations around black hole V.D. Rusov1,∗ M.V. Eingorn2, I.V. Sharph1, V.P. Smolyar1, M.E. Beglaryan3 1Department of Theoretical and Experimental Nuclear Physics, Odessa National Polytechnic University, Odessa, Ukraine 2CREST and NASA Research Centers, North Carolina Central University, Durham, North Carolina, U.S.A. 3Department of Computer Technology and Applied Mathematics, Kuban State University, Krasnodar, Russia Abstract It is shown that the holographic principle of quantum gravity (in the hologram of the Uni- verse, and therefore in our Galaxy, and of course on the Sun!), in which the conflict between the theory of gravitation and quantum mechanics disappears, gives rise to the Babcock-Leighton holographic mechanism. Unlike the solar dynamo models, it generates a strong toroidal mag- netic field by means of the thermomagnetic Ettingshausen-Nernst (EN) effect in the tachocline. Hence, it can be shown that with the help of the thermomagnetic EN effect, a simple estimate of the magnetic pressure of an ideal gas in the tachocline of e.g. the Sun can indirectly prove that by using the holographic principle of quantum gravity, the repulsive toroidal magnetic field Sun 7 Sun of the tachocline (Btacho = 4:1 · 10 G = −Bcore) precisely \neutralizes" the magnetic field in the Sun core, since the projections of the magnetic fields in the tachocline and the core have equal values but opposite directions. The basic problem is a generalized problem of the antidy- namo model of magnetic flux tubes (MFTs), where the nature of both holographic effects (the thermomagnetic EN effect and Babcock-Leighton holographic mechanism), including magnetic cycles, manifests itself in the modulation of asymmetric dark matter (ADM) and, consequently, the solar axion in the Sun interior.
    [Show full text]
  • Where Does the Physics of Extreme Gravitational Collapse Reside?
    universe Review Where Does the Physics of Extreme Gravitational Collapse Reside? Carlos Barceló 1,*, Raúl Carballo-Rubio 1 and Luis J. Garay 2,3 1 Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía (IAA-CSIC), Glorieta de la Astronomía, 18008 Granada, Spain; [email protected] 2 Departamento de Física Teórica II, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain; [email protected] 3 Instituto de Estructura de la Materia (IEM-CSIC), Serrano 121, 28006 Madrid, Spain * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +34-958-121-311 Academic Editor: Gonzalo J. Olmo Received: 20 October 2015; Accepted: 3 May 2016; Published: 13 May 2016 Abstract: The gravitational collapse of massive stars serves to manifest the most severe deviations of general relativity with respect to Newtonian gravity: the formation of horizons and spacetime singularities. Both features have proven to be catalysts of deep physical developments, especially when combined with the principles of quantum mechanics. Nonetheless, it is seldom remarked that it is hardly possible to combine all these developments into a unified theoretical model, while maintaining reasonable prospects for the independent experimental corroboration of its different parts. In this paper we review the current theoretical understanding of the physics of gravitational collapse in order to highlight this tension, stating the position that the standard view on evaporating black holes stands for. This serves as the motivation for the discussion of a recent proposal that offers the opposite perspective, represented by a set of geometries that regularize the classical singular behavior and present modifications of the near-horizon Schwarzschild geometry as the result of the propagation of non-perturbative ultraviolet effects originated in regions of high curvature.
    [Show full text]
  • MATTERS of GRAVITY Contents
    MATTERS OF GRAVITY The newsletter of the Topical Group on Gravitation of the American Physical Society Number 40 Fall 2012 Contents GGR News: we hear that . , by David Garfinkle ..................... 4 100 years ago, by David Garfinkle ...................... 4 New publisher and new book, by Vesselin Petkov .............. 4 Research briefs: Dark Matter News, by Katherine Freese ................... 5 LARES satellite, by Richard Matzner .................... 8 Conference reports: Workshop on Gravitational Wave Bursts, by Pablo Laguna ......... 11 JoshFest, by Ed Glass ............................ 13 Electromagnetic and Gravitational Wave Astronomy, by Sean McWilliams . 14 Bits, Branes, and Black Holes, by Ted Jacobson and Don Marolf ...... 15 1 Editor David Garfinkle Department of Physics Oakland University Rochester, MI 48309 Phone: (248) 370-3411 Internet: garfinkl-at-oakland.edu WWW: http://www.oakland.edu/?id=10223&sid=249#garfinkle Associate Editor Greg Comer Department of Physics and Center for Fluids at All Scales, St. Louis University, St. Louis, MO 63103 Phone: (314) 977-8432 Internet: comergl-at-slu.edu WWW: http://www.slu.edu/colleges/AS/physics/profs/comer.html ISSN: 1527-3431 DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed in the articles of this newsletter represent the views of the authors and are not necessarily the views of APS. The articles in this newsletter are not peer reviewed. 2 Editorial The next newsletter is due February 1st. This and all subsequent issues will be available on the web at https://files.oakland.edu/users/garfinkl/web/mog/ All issues before number 28 are available at http://www.phys.lsu.edu/mog Any ideas for topics that should be covered by the newsletter, should be emailed to me, or Greg Comer, or the relevant correspondent.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1401.6562V4 [Gr-Qc] 8 Feb 2014 Its Expected Planckian Size [6–8]
    Planck stars Carlo Rovelli Aix Marseille Universit´e,CNRS, CPT, UMR 7332, 13288 Marseille, France. Universit´ede Toulon, CNRS, CPT, UMR 7332, 83957 La Garde, France. Francesca Vidotto Radboud University Nijmegen, Institute for Mathematics, Astrophysics and Particle Physics, Mailbox 79, P.O. Box 9010, 6500 GL Nijmegen, The Netherlands (Dated: February 11, 2014) A star that collapses gravitationally can reach a further stage of its life, where quantum-gravitational pressure counteracts weight. The duration of this stage is very short in the star proper time, yielding a bounce, but extremely long seen from the outside, because of the huge gravitational time dilation. Since the onset of quantum-gravitational effects is governed by energy density |not by size| the star can be much larger than planckian in this phase. The object emerging at the end of the Hawking n evaporation of a black hole can then be larger than planckian by a factor (m=mP ) , where m is the mass fallen into the hole, mP is the Planck mass, and n is positive. We consider arguments for n = 1=3 and for n = 1. There is no causality violation or faster-than-light propagation. The existence of these objects alleviates the black-hole information paradox. More interestingly, these objects could have astrophysical and cosmological interest: they produce a detectable signal, of quantum gravitational origin, around the 10−14cm wavelength. Measuring effects of the quantum nature of gravity is server. This, together with the hypothesis of primordial notoriously difficult [1,2], because of the smallness of black holes, opens the possibility of measuring a conse- the Planck scale.
    [Show full text]