Compliance and Defiance to National Integration in Barotseland and Casamance Author(s): Pierre Englebert Reviewed work(s): Source: Africa Spectrum, Vol. 40, No. 1 (2005), pp. 29-59 Published by: Institute of African Affairs at GIGA, Hamburg/Germany Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40175054 . Accessed: 26/09/2012 12:43 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact
[email protected]. Institute of African Affairs at GIGA, Hamburg/Germany is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Africa Spectrum. http://www.jstor.org afrikaspectrum 39 (2005)1: 29 - 59 © 2005Institut fur Afrika-Kunde, Hamburg PierreEnglebert Compliance and defiance to national integration in Barotseland and Casamance1 Abstract What determines whether peripheralregions in Africacomply with the na- tional integration project? Why do some regional elites, outside the core „fusion of elites'7,willingly partakein the state while others promote sepa- rate paths for their communities?This paper suggests some answers, based on a comparisonbetween Barotseland- where the Lozi leadership has cho- sen not to challenge the Zambian project- and Casamance- where local particularismhas resulted in active separatist defiance towards the Sene- galese state among many Diola elites. It argues that the contrast between the two regions is more apparent than real, and that elites in both cases strive for access to the local benefits of sovereign statehood.