DOCSLIB.ORG

Zuffa, LLC Answer Due 9/10/2021. Signed By

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Zuffa, LLC Answer Due 9/10/2021. Signed By Johnson et al v. Zuffa, LLC dba Ultimate Fighting Championship et al Doc. 13 Case 2:21-cv-01189-RFB-BNW Document 1213 Filed 07/16/2107/19/21 Page 1 of 3 1 WILLIAM A. ISAACSON (Pro hac vice forthcoming) ([email protected]) 2 PAUL, WEISS, RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP 2001 K Street, NW 3 Washington, DC 20006 4 Telephone: (202) 223-7313; Fax: (202) 379-4937 5 STACEY K. GRIGSBY (Pro hac vice forthcoming) ([email protected]) 6 COVINGTON & BURLING LLP 7 One CityCenter 850 Tenth Street, NW 8 Washington, DC 20001 Telephone: (202) 662-5238 9 DONALD J. CAMPBELL #1216 10 ([email protected]) 11 J. COLBY WILLIAMS #5549 ([email protected]) 12 CAMPBELL & WILLIAMS 710 South 7th Street, Las Vegas, NV 89101 13 Telephone: (702) 382-5222; Fax: (702) 382-0540 14 Attorneys for Defendants Zuffa, LLC 15 and Endeavor Group Holdings, Inc. 16 [Additional Counsel Listed on Signature Page] 17 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 19 20 KAJAN JOHNSON and CLARENCE Case No.: 2:21-cv-01189-RFB-BNW 21 DOLLAWAY, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, 22 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] Plaintiffs, ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANTS’ 23 v. RESPONSE DEADLINE 24 ZUFFA, LLC, (d/b/a Ultimate Fighting (First Request) 25 Championship and UFC) and Endeavor Group Holdings, Inc., 26 Defendants. 27 28 Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:21-cv-01189-RFB-BNW Document 1213 Filed 07/16/2107/19/21 Page 2 of 3 1 Pursuant to LR 7-1 and LR IA 6-1, the parties hereby stipulate to extend the time in which 2 Defendants Zuffa, LLC and Endeavor Group Holdings, Inc. (collectively, “Zuffa”) may respond to the 3 Complaint (ECF No. 1). This is Zuffa’s first request for an extension of time to respond to the 4 Complaint. 5 On June 23, 2021, Plaintiffs Kajan Johnson and Clarence Dollaway (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) 6 filed a Complaint against Zuffa. Plaintiffs served Zuffa with the Complaint on June 30, 2021, and the 7 current deadline for Zuffa to respond to the Complaint is July 21, 2021. 8 oe parties have agreed that party and judicial eociency would be best served by permitting 9 g3f5 to have an extension to file a response to the Complaint. oerefore, the parties stipulate that g3f5ks 10 response to the Complaint will be due on September 10, 2021. 11 oe parties"lle this Stipulation and Proposed Order to provide Z3f5 an opportunity to evaluate 12 and respond to Plaintif:k Complaint. 13 IT IS SO 1TIPLLATER. 14 Rated: ,uly 16, 2021 By: /s/ J. Colby Williams 15 William A. Isaacson (Pro hac vice forthcoming) 16 8ALL, WEIS1, RIFKINR, WSARTOE & GARRISOE LLP 17 2001 K Street, NW Washington, DC 20006 18 19 1tacey K. Grigsby (Pro hac vice forthcoming) CObINGTOE & BURLING, LLP 20 850 10th Street, NW Washington, DC 20001 21 22 Ronald J. Campbell (Eea. Bar No. 1216) ,. Colby Williams (Eea. Bar No. 5549) 23 CAM8BELL & WILLIAM1 710 South 7th Street 24 Las begas, Nb 89101 25 Attorneys for Defendants Zuffa, LLC and Endeavor 26 Group Holdings, Inc. 27 28 -2- Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Case 2:21-cv-01189-RFB-BNW Document 1213 Filed 07/16/2107/19/21 Page 3 of 3 1 Rated: ,uly 16, 2021 By: /s/ Don Springmeyer 2 Ron Springmeyer, Esq. (Nea. Bar No. 1021) 3800 Howard Hughes Parkway, 17th Floor 3 Las begas, Nevada 89169 4 Eric L. Cramer (Pro hac vice forthcoming) 5 Michael DellkAngelo (Pro hac vice forthcoming) 8atrick Madden (Pro hac vice forthcoming) 6 Mark R. Suter (Pro hac vice forthcoming) BERGER & MOETAGLE, P.C. 7 1818 Market St., Suite 3600 8 8hiladelphia, PA 19103 9 Richard A. K-fKan (Pro hac vice forthcoming) Be/damin D. Brown (Pro hac vice forthcoming) 10 Raniel Silverman FPro hac vice forthcoming) COSEE MIL1TEIN SELLEO1 & TOLL, PLLC 11 1100 New York Ave., N.W., Suite 500, East Tower 12 Washington, DC 20005 13 Robert C. Maysey (Pro hac vice forthcoming) ,erome K. Elwell (Pro hac vice forthcoming) 14 WAOEER AEGLE HALLAM JACK1OE & 15 PORMEEK PLC 2555 E. Camelback Road, Suite 800 16 8hoenix, Ag 85016 17 ,oseph R. Saveri (Pro hac vice forthcoming) ,oshua P. Daa.s FPro hac vice forthcoming) 18 Kea.n E. Rayhill FPro hac vice forthcoming) 19 ,O1E8S SAbERI LAW FIRM, INC. 601 California St, Suite 1000 20 1an Francisco, California 94108 21 Attorneys for Individual and Representative Plaintiffs 22 Kajan Johnson and Clarence Dollaway 23 IT IS SO ORDERED: 24 _________________________________________ 25 LEITER STATE1 DISTRICT [MAGISTRATE] 26 ,LRVN 7/19/2021 27 RATER:__________________________________ 28 -3- ,-int Stipulation and 78roposed] Order .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Constitutional Combat: Is Fighting a Form of Free Speech?
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Villanova University School of Law: Digital Repository Volume 20 Issue 2 Article 4 2013 Constitutional Combat: Is Fighting a Form of Free Speech? The Ultimate Fighting Championship and its Struggle Against the State of New York Over the Message of Mixed Martial Arts Daniel Berger Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/mslj Part of the Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons, and the First Amendment Commons Recommended Citation Daniel Berger, Constitutional Combat: Is Fighting a Form of Free Speech? The Ultimate Fighting Championship and its Struggle Against the State of New York Over the Message of Mixed Martial Arts, 20 Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports L.J. 381 (2013). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/mslj/vol20/iss2/4 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal by an authorized editor of Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. \\jciprod01\productn\V\VLS\20-2\VLS204.txt unknown Seq: 1 14-JUN-13 13:05 Berger: Constitutional Combat: Is Fighting a Form of Free Speech? The Ul Articles CONSTITUTIONAL COMBAT: IS FIGHTING A FORM OF FREE SPEECH? THE ULTIMATE FIGHTING CHAMPIONSHIP AND ITS STRUGGLE AGAINST THE STATE OF NEW YORK OVER THE MESSAGE OF MIXED MARTIAL ARTS DANIEL BERGER* I. INTRODUCTION The promotion-company
    [Show full text]
  • Outside the Cage: the Political Campaign to Destroy Mixed Martial Arts
    University of Central Florida STARS Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 2013 Outside The Cage: The Political Campaign To Destroy Mixed Martial Arts Andrew Doeg University of Central Florida Part of the History Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Masters Thesis (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STARS Citation Doeg, Andrew, "Outside The Cage: The Political Campaign To Destroy Mixed Martial Arts" (2013). Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019. 2530. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/2530 OUTSIDE THE CAGE: THE CAMPAIGN TO DESTROY MIXED MARTIAL ARTS By ANDREW DOEG B.A. University of Central Florida, 2010 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of History in the College of Arts and Humanities at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Spring Term 2013 © 2013 Andrew Doeg ii ABSTRACT This is an early history of Mixed Martial Arts in America. It focuses primarily on the political campaign to ban the sport in the 1990s and the repercussions that campaign had on MMA itself. Furthermore, it examines the censorship of music and video games in the 1990s. The central argument of this work is that the political campaign to ban Mixed Martial Arts was part of a larger political movement to censor violent entertainment.
    [Show full text]
  • Zuffa, LLC Dba Ultimate Fighting Championship Date: September 20, 2018 6650 S
    Board Summary Zuffa, LLC dba Ultimate Fighting Championship Date: September 20, 2018 6650 S. Torrey Pines, Las Vegas, NV 89118 Main Location: Carson City Lawrence Epstein, Chief Operating Officer Sports Promotion and Production Business Type: Expansion County: Clark County Development Authority Representative: Kylie Rowe - LVGEA APPLICATION HIGHLIGHTS - Zuffa, LLC dba Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) is exploring the option to expand operations and relocate its California production facility to southern Nevada. - The proposed project would include construction of an events and production studio. The construction will encompass office space, editing suites, and studio, and control room build outs. PROFILE UFC is a premium global sports and media brand and the fastest growing sports organization in the world. The company started in 1993 as a professional mixed martial arts (MMA) organization. UFC has revolutionized the fight business, and today stands as the world's leading MMA promoter, offering the premier series of MMA sports events that have sold out some of the biggest arenas and stadiums across the globe. Owned and operated by Zuffa, LLC, headquartered in Las Vegas and with offices in London, Toronto and Singapore (among others), UFC produces more than 40 live events annually and is the largest Pay-Per-View event provider in the world. UFC events are broadcast in over 129 countries and territories, to nearly 800 million TV households worldwide, in 28 different languages. UFC is the only professional sports organization in the world where male and female athletes compete on equal ground, in all respects, including PayScale, rule set, playing field, and equipment. The company has a strong commitment to corporate social responsibility and recently announced a new national charitable partnership with Miracle Flights, the nation’s leading nonprofit health and welfare flight organization providing free commercial air transportation to critically ill children in need of medical care far from home.
    [Show full text]
  • COMPLAINT 25 V
    Case5:14-cv-05484 Document1 Filed12/16/14 Page1 of 63 1 Joseph R. Saveri (State Bar No. 130064) Joshua P. Davis (State Bar No. 193254) 2 Andrew M. Purdy (State Bar No. 261912) Kevin E. Rayhill (State Bar No. 267496) 3 JOSEPH SAVERI LAW FIRM, INC. 505 Montgomery Street, Suite 625 4 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 500-6800 5 Facsimile: (415) 395-9940 [email protected] 6 [email protected] [email protected] 7 [email protected] 8 Benjamin D. Brown (State Bar No. 202545) Hiba Hafiz (pro hac vice pending) 9 COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL, PLLC 1100 New York Ave., N.W., Suite 500, East Tower 10 Washington, DC 20005 Telephone: (202) 408-4600 11 Facsimile: (202) 408 4699 [email protected] 12 [email protected] 13 Eric L. Cramer (pro hac vice pending) Michael Dell’Angelo (pro hac vice pending) 14 BERGER & MONTAGUE, P.C. 1622 Locust Street 15 Philadelphia, PA 19103 Telephone: (215) 875-3000 16 Facsimile: (215) 875-4604 [email protected] 17 [email protected] 18 Attorneys for Individual and Representative Plaintiffs Cung Le, Nathan Quarry, and Jon Fitch 19 [Additional Counsel Listed on Signature Page] 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 21 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 22 Cung Le, Nathan Quarry, Jon Fitch, on behalf of Case No. 23 themselves and all others similarly situated, 24 Plaintiffs, ANTITRUST CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT 25 v. 26 Zuffa, LLC, d/b/a Ultimate Fighting DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Championship and UFC, 27 Defendant. 28 30 Case No. 31 ANTITRUST CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT 32 Case5:14-cv-05484 Document1 Filed12/16/14 Page2 of 63 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 3 I.
    [Show full text]
  • In the United States District Court for the District of Nevada
    Case 2:15-cv-01045-RFB-PAL Document 554 Filed 05/30/18 Page 1 of 37 1 Eric L. Cramer (Pro Hac Vice) Michael Dell’Angelo (Pro Hac Vice) 2 Patrick F. Madden (Pro Hac Vice) Mark R. Suter (Pro Hac Vice) 3 BERGER & MONTAGUE, P.C. 4 1622 Locust Street Philadelphia, PA 19103 5 Telephone: (215) 875-3000 Facsimile: (215) 875-4604 6 [email protected] 7 [email protected] [email protected] 8 [email protected] 9 Co-Lead Counsel for the Classes and Attorneys for Individual and Representative Plaintiffs 10 Cung Le, Nathan Quarry, Jon Fitch, Luis Javier 11 Vazquez, Brandon Vera, and Kyle Kingsbury 12 (Additional counsel appear on signature page) 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA 15 Cung Le, Nathan Quarry, Jon Fitch, Brandon Case No.: 2:15-cv-01045-RFB-PAL 16 Vera, Luis Javier Vazquez, and Kyle Kingsbury, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly 17 situated, REPLY IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION 18 Plaintiffs, 19 v. 20 21 Zuffa, LLC, d/b/a Ultimate Fighting Championship and UFC, 22 Defendant. 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No.: 2:15-cv-01045-RFB-(PAL) REPLY IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION PUBLIC COPY - REDACTED Case 2:15-cv-01045-RFB-PAL Document 554 Filed 05/30/18 Page 2 of 37 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 3 ARGUMENT ..................................................................................................................... 3 4 A. Zuffa Misstates the Rule 23 Standards ................................................................... 3 5 B. Evidence of the Antitrust Violation Is Entirely Common and Will Predominate .
    [Show full text]
  • ZUFFA/UFC Moderator: Jennifer Wenk 10-09-08/12:00 P.M
    ZUFFA/UFC Moderator: Jennifer Wenk 10-09-08/12:00 p.m. CT Confirmation # 3993445 Page 1 ZUFFA/UFC Moderator: Jennifer Wenk October 9, 2008 12:00 p.m. CT Operator: Good day, and welcome to the UCH6 Conference Call. As a reminder, today’s conference is being recorded. I’d like to turn the call over to Ms. Jennifer Wenk. Please go ahead, ma’am. Jennifer Wenk: Hi, good morning, everybody, thanks for dialing in this morning and this is the UFC 89 Media Conference Call. So I just wanted to thank you for calling in and I wanted to let you know Michael Bisping and Chris Leben, are both here on the line for you. We’ll go ahead and get started. We’re all obviously really excited about this fight in the U.K. This is a fight that fans have been waiting to see you know ever since they were both on the Ultimate Fighter; and you guys are finally going to see it on October 18th, live from Birmingham U.K. This fight is going to be telecast on Spike TV starting at 9:00 Eastern and Pacific; and it’ll also go live on Setanta Sports One at 8:00 in the U.K. So let's go ahead and open it up for Q&A. Operator: And at this time, if you’d like to ask a question, please press star one. Again, as a reminder, that is star one to ask a question and we’ll pause for a moment. We’ll go ahead with our first question.
    [Show full text]
  • Mixed Martial Arts 1 Mixed Martial Arts
    Mixed martial arts 1 Mixed martial arts Mixed Martial Arts Patrick Barry (Blue shorts) and Mirko Filipović (Checkered shorts) in the co-main event of UFC 115 in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Also known as Vale Tudo, No Holds Barred (NHB), Cage Fighting, Ultimate Fighting, Pride Fighting, Sougo Kakutogi Focus Various Hardness Full contact Olympic sport No Mixed martial arts (MMA), popularly known as cage fighting or ultimate fighting is a full contact combat sport that allows a wide variety of fighting techniques and skills, from a mixture of other combat sports, to be used in competitions. The rules allow the use of both striking as well as grappling techniques, both while standing and while on the ground. Such competitions allow fighters of different backgrounds to compete. The roots of modern mixed martial arts can be traced back to various mixed style contests that took place throughout Europe, Japan and the Pacific Rim during the early 1900s. The combat sport of Vale Tudo that had developed in Brazil from the 1920s was brought to the United States by the Gracie family in 1993 with the founding of the Ultimate Fighting Championship. Professional MMA events had also been held in Japan by Shooto starting back in 1989. In due course the more dangerous Vale Tudo style bouts of the early UFCs were made safer with the implementation of additional rules, leading to the popular regulated form of MMA seen today. Originally promoted as a competition with the intention of finding the most effective martial arts for real unarmed combat situations,
    [Show full text]
  • Let's Get Ready to Unbundle!
    LET’S GET READY TO UNBUNDLE! It’s Time for the UFC to Offer Individual Fights for Purchase Nick Cornor Abstract A bedrock principle of U.S. Copyright law normally dictates that when a person steals your original work of authorship, a court should issue an injunc- tion and require the violator to pay damages. For centuries this principle has sufficed; however, a lack of deep-pocket defendants and continued lobbying efforts by internet service providers have made this principle untenable when applied to illegal online streaming. This is especially true for the Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC), a mixed martial arts promoter that has seen its live broadcasts pirated over the internet at an alarming rate, thereby threaten- ing the bulk of its revenue. This Comment advocates that the UFC unbundle its current pay- per-view business model in favor of charging market-based prices for each individual fight. The primary benefit of this approach includes increased rev- enue for the UFC by enticing consumers away from illegal online streaming with lower prices. Potential adjacent benefits include reforming fighter com- pensation schemes, incentivizing fighters to promote their own individual fights, easing controversies regarding unionization efforts by the fighters, and providing the UFC with greater marketing data. Therefore, by unbundling its business model, the UFC will ultimately be able to bypass the shortcomings of U.S. Copyright law and take the lead in a digital media landscape already changing at lightning speeds. * J.D., South Texas College of Law Houston; M.A., University of Oklahoma, 2013; B.S. University of Texas at Arlington, 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Ufc 82: Pride of a Champion
    For Immediate Release: Dec. 26, 2007 ULTIMATE FIGHTING CHAMPIONSHIP® RETURNS TO COLUMBUS UFC 82: PRIDE OF A CHAMPION SATURDAY, MARCH 1, 2008 LIVE FROM NATIONWIDE ARENA UFC® WORLD MIDDLEWEIGHT CHAMPIONSHIP ANDERSON SILVA vs. DAN HENDERSON Tickets Go on Sale Sunday, Dec. 30 at 10am ET Las Vegas, NV (USA) – In a long-awaited super-fight to determine the undisputed king of the middleweight division, Anderson "The Spider" Silva, UFC Middleweight Champion, will take on PRIDE 183-lb. Champion Dan Henderson when the Ultimate Fighting Championship® (UFC®) makes its third trip to the state of Ohio on Saturday, March 1, 2008 for UFC 82: PRIDE OF A CHAMPION, live from Nationwide Arena in Columbus. “Anderson Silva has been so dominant as UFC Middleweight Champion that people are starting to wonder if there is anyone out there who can dethrone him,” said Dana White, UFC President. “Now Pride champion Dan Henderson has stepped up to the challenge. Anderson Silva may be the best pound-for-pound fighter in the sport and Dan Henderson may be the strongest, toughest guy in the middleweight division so there is no doubt in my mind that this will be a battle that goes down in the history books.” (more) UFC 82…Page 2 of 3 The UFC visited Columbus, Ohio last year when it held UFC 68: THE UPRISING at Nationwide Arena on March 3. More than 19,000 people attended the sold-out event, which grossed a gate of more than $3 million. The event set a new record for the highest North American attendance figure for a mixed martial arts event, and still stands as the largest gate in Nationwide Arena history.
    [Show full text]
  • Steve Sisolak Governor
    Bob Bennett Steve Sisolak STATE OF NEVADA Executive Director Governor OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR ATHLETIC COMMISSION Chairman: Anthony A. Marnell III Members: Staci Alonso, Christopher Ault, Dallas Haun, Stephen Cloobeck NOTICE OF MEETING AND AGENDA A duly authorized meeting of the Nevada State Athletic Commission (“Commission”) will be held on Tuesday, February 09, 2021, at 9:00_a.m. Pursuant to the Governor’s Emergency Declaration 006, there will be no physical location for this meeting. Please see: Declaration of Emergency Directive 006 Section 1 at http://gov.nv.gov/News/Emergency_Orders/2020/2020- 03-22_-_COVID- 19_Declaration_of_Emergency_Directive_006/. Members of the public may attend and participate in the meeting telephonically: Teleconference: 1-800-747-5150 Access Code: 4864000 # Pursuant to the Governor’s Emergency Declaration 006 Section 5, the requirement to provide a physical location to obtain supporting documents has been suspended. Please see Declaration of Emergency Directive 006 (supra.). Download Agenda at boxing.nv.gov. A. CALL TO ORDER. B. ROLL CALL. C. PUBLIC COMMENT. Comments from the public are invited at this time prior to the commencement of possible action items. The Chairman of the Commission reserves the right to limit the amount of time that will be allowed for each individual to speak. The Commission is precluded from acting on items raised during Public Comment that are not on the agenda. D. MINUTES. 1. Approval of the minutes of the meeting of January 13, 2021, for possible action. E. CONSENT AGENDA: • Request for Program Permits per Nevada Administrative Code (NAC) 467.167 1. Request by Star Boxing Inc., for a program permit to co-promote a professional boxing event, to be held on February 13, 2021 at MGM Grand property, in Las Vegas, NV, to be televised on ESPN, for possible action.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise and Rise of the UFC (Or Will Oversaturation Lead to Its Downfall)
    (Cite as: Laws of the Game, ISSN: 2058-7244) Volume 1, Issue 1 Article 2 From rags to riches: The rise and rise of the UFC (or will oversaturation lead to its downfall). R Savage-West Abstract In 1993, the Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) promoted a “no holds barred” mixed-martial arts contest designed to answer the perennial combat sports fans' question - can a wrestler beat a boxer? Considerable blood, sweat and (some) tears later, the UFC has turned into a multimedia corporate behemoth. This article will analyse the origins of the Ultimate fighting Championship and its continued struggle to gain mainstream acceptance and regulatory approval. In particular, the article will analyse how the UFC has shifted between subscription-based channels, event pay-per-view television, free-to-air shows and non-traditional media channels such as social media and user-generated content depending on how acceptable its product was deemed for the public. The article will conclude by arguing that while UFC has expanded globally and now dominates the mixed- martial arts industry, the ever-increasing demand for high-quality events taking place against a backdrop of corporate respectability, may eventually alienate its core market and lead to an ultimely demise…. Keywords: Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC), Mixed-Martial arts (MMA), regulation, commercial, media [First submitted as part fulfilment of the degree of LLB hons, Staffordshire University] Recommended Citation R Savage-West, ‘From rags to riches: the rise and rise of the UFC (or will oversaturation lead to its downfall?) (2015) 1 Laws of the Game 2 [Available at: www.staffs.ac.uk/lawsofthegame/] Page 2 of 11 INTRODUCTION Just over a decade ago, the Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) was on the verge of bankruptcy and there were concerns as to whether the UFC should even exist,1 let alone be broadcast on TV.2 American politicians such as Sen.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ultimate Fighting Championship and Zuffa: from ‘Human Cock-Fighting' to Market Power Carl J
    American University Business Law Review Volume 6 | Issue 3 Article 4 2017 The Ultimate Fighting Championship and Zuffa: From ‘Human Cock-Fighting' to Market Power Carl J. Gaul IV American University Washington College of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/aublr Part of the Antitrust and Trade Regulation Commons Recommended Citation Gaul, Carl J. IV "The Ultimate Fighting Championship and Zuffa: rF om ‘Human Cock-Fighting' to Market Power," American University Business Law Review, Vol. 6, No. 3 (). Available at: http://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/aublr/vol6/iss3/4 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by the Washington College of Law Journals & Law Reviews at Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in American University Business Law Review by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE ULTIMATE FIGHTING CHAMPIONSHIP AND ZUFFA: FROM ‘HUMAN COCK-FIGHTING’ TO MARKET POWER CARL J. GAUL IV* The Ultimate Fighting Championship (“UFC”) is the premier mixed martial arts (“MMA”) promotion in the world and is the most recent athletic organization to attain a dominant market share that arguably constitutes a monopoly or monopsony. Antitrust law prohibits organizations from restraining trade or intentionally stamping out market place competition to attain or maintain monopoly power. The UFC’s behavior has raised significant concerns about competition in two separate markets: the MMA Promotional Market and Elite MMA Labor Market. While the MMA Promotional Market appears more competitive than it has ever been, the Elite MMA Labor Market has seen significant reductions in competition.
    [Show full text]