DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix H - Gap Status of Vertebrate Species

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix H - Gap Status of Vertebrate Species Appendix H - Gap status of vertebrate species Table H1 Gap status of amphibian species Common Name Elcode Status 1 Status 2 Status 3 Status 4 Pct in Total HA % of % HA % HA % HA % HA Status 1 & 2 Georgia Alabama waterdog AAAAE01010 0.7558 427 2.1839 1,235 0.9861 558 96.0742 54,332 2.9397 56,552 0.3671 American toad AAABB01020 1.7340 67,681 2.2753 88,807 7.7921 304,137 88.1986 3,442,523 4.0093 3,903,148 25.3355 Apalachicola dusky salamander AAAAD03120 0.3084 46 1.1699 173 14.8126 2,191 83.7091 12,384 1.4783 14,794 0.0960 Barking treefrog AAABC02100 2.6912 166,907 2.4131 149,660 3.5712 221,487 91.3245 5,663,897 5.1043 6,201,950 40.2572 Bird-voiced treefrog AAABC02030 1.0377 7,715 3.1698 23,567 5.3613 39,861 90.4313 672,350 4.2075 743,494 4.8261 Blackbelly salamander AAAAD03080 10.3723 4,070 2.0214 793 32.7075 12,834 54.8989 21,542 12.3937 39,239 0.2547 Blue Ridge two-lined salamander AAAAD05150 10.9049 10,629 1.9154 1,867 34.6328 33,755 52.5469 51,215 12.8203 97,466 0.6327 Brimley's chorus frog AAABC05020 2.6109 5,678 2.2751 4,948 7.9622 17,317 87.1518 189,545 4.8859 217,489 1.4117 Brownback salamander NONE 0.3874 95 0.7694 188 8.8894 2,172 89.9538 21,982 1.1568 24,437 0.1586 Bullfrog AAABH01070 6.7804 72,246 3.7188 39,623 3.0085 32,055 86.4923 921,581 10.4992 1,065,505 6.9162 Carpenter frog AAABH01230 0.8462 54,629 1.9195 123,924 3.7049 239,194 93.5294 6,038,365 2.7656 6,456,111 41.9069 Cave salamander AAAAD05050 3.7366 3,073 1.0908 897 6.7121 5,519 88.4605 72,742 4.8274 82,231 0.5338 Cope's gray treefrog AAABC02050 1.1582 99,944 1.9392 167,334 5.5110 475,549 91.3916 7,886,256 3.0974 8,629,083 56.0118 Dwarf blackbelly salamander NONE 14.9158 454 0.3722 11 25.5598 779 59.1521 1,802 15.2880 3,047 0.0198 Dwarf salamander AAAAD05090 6.3822 139,423 2.7631 60,361 3.3620 73,445 87.4927 1,911,325 9.1453 2,184,553 14.1800 Dwarf siren AAAAG01010 7.0114 15,037 2.1118 4,529 32.0675 68,775 58.8092 126,127 9.1232 214,469 1.3921 Dwarf waterdog AAAAE01050 1.1874 6,097 4.1174 21,142 4.8254 24,777 89.8698 461,460 5.3048 513,476 3.3330 Eastern narrowmouth toad AAABE01010 2.0079 159,244 2.0410 161,869 3.5925 284,912 92.3585 7,324,717 4.0490 7,930,742 51.4788 Eastern spadefoot toad AAABF01040 8.2326 147,984 3.5481 63,779 3.5039 62,983 84.7153 1,522,780 11.7808 1,797,526 11.6678 Flatwoods salamander AAAAA01030 11.3493 6,130 3.5054 1,893 47.1592 25,471 37.9861 20,517 14.8547 54,011 0.3506 Four-toed salamander AAAAD08010 0.3723 2,505 1.7848 12,009 4.9204 33,108 92.9225 625,247 2.1570 672,869 4.3676 Fowler's toad AAABB01160 2.9418 177,711 2.1132 127,656 3.4721 209,748 91.4729 5,525,830 5.0550 6,040,945 39.2121 Georgia blind salamander AAAAD07010 2.4913 8,577 1.1746 4,044 1.0666 3,672 95.2675 328,000 3.6659 344,294 2.2348 Gopher frog AAABH01270 2.6108 190,879 2.1215 155,106 4.2244 308,846 91.0433 6,656,238 4.7323 7,311,069 47.4565 Greater siren AAAAG02020 13.0422 57,781 5.3807 23,838 5.3839 23,852 76.1933 337,561 18.4228 443,032 2.8757 Green frog/bronze frog AAABH01090 4.9069 154,147 2.8256 88,766 3.5656 112,011 88.7019 2,786,528 7.7325 3,141,451 20.3913 Green salamander AAAAD01010 14.7712 3,633 1.8711 460 29.9365 7,363 53.4212 13,138 16.6423 24,594 0.1596 Green treefrog AAABC02060 3.1761 171,819 2.1782 117,835 3.3486 181,149 91.2972 4,938,976 5.3543 5,409,779 35.1151 Greenhouse frog AAABD04080 0.8630 197 4.1272 941 2.1090 481 92.9008 21,178 4.9902 22,797 0.1480 Hellbender AAAAC01010 6.4240 394 1.3728 84 14.0668 863 78.1365 4,795 7.7968 6,136 0.0398 Jordan's salamander AAAAD12090 17.1367 8,152 0.8481 403 64.5559 30,711 17.4593 8,306 17.9848 47,573 0.3088 Lesser siren AAAAG02010 8.3001 149,634 3.6161 65,191 3.5457 63,921 84.5382 1,524,054 11.9161 1,802,800 11.7021 Little grass frog AAABC05110 3.7576 118,119 2.3061 72,492 4.0652 127,791 89.8711 2,825,107 6.0636 3,143,509 20.4047 274 Common Name Elcode Status 1 Status 2 Status 3 Status 4 Pct in Total HA % of % HA % HA % HA % HA Status 1 & 2 Georgia Long- tailed Salamander AAAAD05040 1.9929 1,988 0.9457 944 7.2491 7,233 89.8122 89,618 2.9386 99,784 0.6477 Many-lined salamander AAAAD14010 2.2480 3,965 3.3839 5,968 1.0395 1,833 93.3286 164,603 5.6320 176,370 1.1448 Marbled salamander AAAAA01100 0.5825 22,082 1.8561 70,365 4.5543 172,658 93.0071 3,525,950 2.4385 3,791,055 24.6079 Mole salamander AAAAA01120 0.9906 22,015 1.6775 37,283 5.4140 120,326 91.9179 2,042,877 2.6681 2,222,502 14.4264 Mountain chorus frog AAABC05010 2.8183 191,392 2.0515 139,317 5.6474 383,510 89.4828 6,076,737 4.8698 6,790,955 44.0804 Mud salamander AAAAD13010 4.6129 146,678 2.4405 77,601 3.8152 121,312 89.1314 2,834,125 7.0534 3,179,717 20.6397 Mudpuppy AAAAE01040 2.3133 151 0.3386 22 7.3890 481 89.9591 5,859 2.6519 6,513 0.0423 Northern cricket frog AAABC01010 1.9122 72,403 1.9000 71,943 7.2061 272,855 88.9816 3,369,220 3.8122 3,786,422 24.5779 Oak toad AAABB01180 1.2377 70,789 2.0816 119,048 6.2336 356,512 90.4471 5,172,830 3.3193 5,719,179 37.1235 Ocoee salamander AAAAD03140 10.8376 20,163 1.9126 3,558 33.4722 62,275 53.7776 100,053 12.7502 186,050 1.2077 One-toed amphiuma AAAAB01020 0.8214 69 0.8663 73 0.0000 0 98.3123 8,273 1.6877 8,415 0.0546 Ornate chorus frog AAABC05050 1.9940 6,156 1.7045 5,262 8.4258 26,012 87.8756 271,290 3.6986 308,721 2.0039 Pickerel frog AAABH01160 2.6182 190,059 2.1622 156,957 4.0830 296,398 91.1366 6,615,824 4.7803 7,259,239 47.1201 Pig frog AAABH01110 6.4931 141,681 2.8071 61,252 2.4539 53,546 88.2459 1,925,565 9.3002 2,182,044 14.1638 Pigeon Mountain salamander AAAAD12310 44.9527 976 0.0000 0 0.0000 0 55.0473 1,195 44.9527 2,170 0.0141 Pine woods treefrog AAABC02090 3.2113 146,478 2.3985 109,401 3.9759 181,351 90.4144 4,124,079 5.6098 4,561,309 29.6077 Red salamander AAAAD13020 13.6493 144,949 4.1758 44,346 4.4185 46,923 77.7564 825,739 17.8251 1,061,957 6.8932 Red-spotted/Central newt AAAAF01030 2.7091 243,419 2.3229 208,716 5.4937 493,614 89.4743 8,039,415 5.0320 8,985,164 58.3231 River frog AAABH01120 3.3615 64,545 1.9874 38,160 11.1364 213,831 83.5147 1,603,570 5.3489 1,920,105 12.4635 Seal salamander AAAAD03060 4.4802 20,820 2.1980 10,214 14.1105 65,573 79.2113 368,103 6.6782 464,710 3.0165 Seepage salamander AAAAD03010 14.1108 22,546 2.2202 3,547 27.5875 44,079 56.0815 89,607 16.3310 159,779 1.0371 Shovelnose salamander AAAAD10010 14.9687 629 1.8258 77 54.0052 2,268 29.2002 1,226 16.7945 4,200 0.0273 Slimy salamander complex AAAAD12070 1.8912 147,066 2.0868 162,276 4.7488 369,281 91.2731 7,097,609 3.9780 7,776,232 50.4759 Southern Appalachian salamander AAAAD12300 8.7712 3,106 1.7590 623 65.2278 23,101 24.2420 8,586 10.5302 35,416 0.2299 Southern chorus frog AAABC05040 4.0075 119,292 2.3604 70,262 3.3921 100,972 90.2400 2,686,169 6.3679 2,976,694 19.3219 Southern cricket frog AAABC01020 4.3760 158,553 2.7375 99,187 3.3406 121,038 89.5460 3,244,491 7.1135 3,623,269 23.5188 Southern dusky salamander AAAAD03020 9.2011 109,302 3.3638 39,960 3.5356 42,000 83.8995 996,665 12.5649 1,187,927 7.7109 Southern leopard frog AAABH01220 4.2797 56,089 2.3384 30,647 14.5394 190,553 78.8425 1,033,308 6.6181 1,310,598 8.5072 Southern redback salamander AAAAD12160 3.8183 62,616 2.2535 36,956 9.3025 152,552 84.6256 1,387,772 6.2551 1,570,062 10.1914 Southern toad AAABB01130 3.3887 138,583 2.1915 89,624 4.0092 163,958 90.4106 3,697,396 5.5802 4,089,561 26.5455 Southern two-lined salamander AAAAD05140 0.6962 12,708 2.4220 44,206 3.7051 67,626 93.1766 1,700,650 3.1182 1,825,189 11.8474 Spotted dusky salamander AAAAD03040 0.6172 1,396 1.9189 4,340 4.1047 9,285 93.3593 211,175 2.5360 226,196 1.4682 Spotted salamander AAAAA01090 0.3457 3,070 1.5701 13,944 4.0272 35,767 94.0570 835,354 1.9157 888,135 5.7649 Spring peeper AAABC05090 0.4037 10,241 1.8914 47,979 3.2149 81,552 94.4899 2,396,884 2.2951 2,536,655 16.4656 Spring salamander AAAAD06020 3.7411 5,808 1.9079 2,962 11.8806 18,445 82.4704 128,038 5.6490 155,253 1.0078 Squirrel treefrog AAABC02120 2.1009 151,428 2.3699 170,818 3.7113 267,508 91.8179 6,618,117 4.4708 7,207,871 46.7866 275 Common Name Elcode Status 1 Status 2 Status 3 Status 4 Pct in Total HA % of % HA % HA % HA % HA Status 1 & 2 Georgia Striped newt AAAAF01020 9.1642 14,751 2.8550 4,596 31.7764 51,149 56.2044 90,470 12.0192 160,966 1.0448 Tennessee cave salamander AAAAD06010 13.3990 3,119 1.1806 275 0.0000 0 85.4205 19,881 14.5795 23,274 0.1511 Three-lined Salamander AAAAD05290 0.9115 7,948 2.5008 21,809 4.9047 42,772 91.6830 799,525 3.4123 872,053 5.6605 Tiger salamander AAAAA01140 0.4814 14,895 1.5861 49,077 4.2548 131,649 93.6777 2,898,518 2.0675 3,094,139 20.0842 Two-toed amphiuma AAAAB01010 8.3007 149,634 3.6167 65,196 3.5460 63,921 84.5366 1,523,901 11.9174 1,802,651 11.7011 Upland chorus frog AAABC05070 8.5793 136,992 3.4395 54,920 3.8012 60,697 84.1800 1,344,160 12.0188 1,596,769 10.3647 Webster's salamander AAAAD12210 0.1937 1,625 2.3648 19,830 3.5978 30,169 93.8437 786,918 2.5586 838,541 5.4430 Wood frog AAABH01200 18.2453 114,665 6.2706 39,408 6.4277 40,396 69.0563 433,992 24.5160 628,461 4.0794 Zigzag salamander AAAAD12030 11.2575 7,011 1.6986 1,058 0.0000 0 87.0439 54,210 12.9561 62,279 0.4043 276 Table H2 Gap status of breeding bird species Common Name Elcode Status 1 Status 2 Status 3 Status 4 Pct in Total HA % of % HA % HA % HA % HA Status 1 & 2 Georgia Acadian flycatcher ABPAE33020 2.6893 54,212 2.1648 43,639 6.0296 121,545 89.1163 1,796,430 4.8541 2,015,827 13.0848 American crow ABPAV10010 1.8414 275,410 1.6758 250,640 3.9841 595,868 92.4986 13,834,217 3.5173 14,956,135 97.0810 American goldfinch ABPBY06110 0.1206 2,308 0.7026 13,448 0.9228 17,663 98.2540 1,880,655 0.8232 1,914,075
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FEB Craig Guyer - 4 1999 Department of Zoology and Wildlife Science Auburn University Auburn, AL 36849 (334)-844-9232 [email protected]
    HISTORICAL AFFINITIES AND POPULATION BIOLOGY OF THE BLACK WARRIOR WATERDOG (NECTURUS ALABAMENSIS) FINAL REPORT FY 1998 FEB - 4 1999 Craig Guyer Department of Zoology and Wildlife Science Auburn University Auburn, AL 36849 (334)-844-9232 [email protected] SUMMARY 1) The Black Warrior waterdog is morphologically and genetically distinctive from other waterdogs in the state of Alabama and should be recognized as Necturus alabamensis. 2) The Black Warrior waterdog is most closely related to the mudpuppy, Necturus maculosus. 3) Four waterdogs are present in the state of Alabama, the two listed above, plus two forms from the Coastal Plains; the latter include Necturus beyeri (all rivers draining into Mobile Bay) and Necturus iodingi (Appalachicola to Perdido drainages, inclusive). 4) Populations of Black Warrior waterdogs in Sipsey Fork and Brushy Creek appear to be patchily distributed, creating challenges for determining key features of demography. 5) State and Federal protection of the Black Warrior waterdog as a threatened species is warranted. INTRODUCTION Waterdogs (Necturus: Proteidae) are paedomorphic, stream-dwelling salamanders of the Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plains. The systematics of these creatures has challenged herpetologists for the past 60 years. The Black Warrior Waterdog, a species restricted to the upper Black Warrior drainages of Alabama, has been particularly problematic. Viosca (1937) originally described this taxon as being similar toN maculosus, but subsequent taxonomic treattnents considered specimens from this drainage to be conspecific with waterdogs from the lower portions of the Mobile drainages (N maculosus: Bishop 1943, Schmidt 1953; N beyeri alabamensis: Hecht 1958, Conant 1958; N puncta/us: Brode 1969; N beyeri: Mount 1975; N alabamensis: Conant 1975, Conant and Collins 1998).
    [Show full text]
  • Pre-Incursion Plan PIP006 Salamanders and Newts
    Pre-incursion Plan PIP006 Salamanders and Newts Pre-incursion Plan PIP006 Salamanders and Newts Order: Ambystomatidae, Cryptobranchidea and Proteidae Scope This plan is in place to guide prevention and eradication activities and the management of non-indigenous populations of Salamanders and Newts (Order Caudata; Families Salamandridae, Ambystomatidae, Cryptobranchidea and Proteidae) amphibians in the wild in Victoria. Version Document Status Date Author Reviewed By Approved for Release 1.0 First Draft 26/07/11 Dana Price M. Corry, S. Wisniewski and A. Woolnough 1.1 Second Draft 21/10/11 Dana Price S. Wisniewski 2.0 Final Draft 18/01/2012 Dana Price 3.0 Revision Draft 12/11/15 Dana Price J. Goldsworthy 3.1 New Final 10/03/2016 Nigel Roberts D.Price New DEDJTR templates and document review Published by the Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources, Agriculture Victoria, May 2016 © The State of Victoria 2016. This publication is copyright. No part may be reproduced by any process except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. Authorised by the Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources, 1 Spring Street, Melbourne 3000. Front cover: Smooth Newt (Lissotriton vulgaris) Photo: Image courtesy of High Risk Invasive Animals group, DEDJTR Photo: Image from Wikimedia Commons and reproduced with permission under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.5 Generic License. ISBN 078-1-925532-40-1 (pdf/online) Disclaimer This publication may be of assistance to you but the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any information in this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Amphibian Conservation INTRODUCTION
    2014 | HIGHLIGHTS AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS amphibian conservation INTRODUCTION Zoos and aquariums accredited by the Association of Zoos and Aquariums (AZA) have made long-term commitments, both individually and as a community organized under the Amphibian Taxon Advisory Group (ATAG), to the conservation of amphibians throughout the Americas and around the world. With the support and hard work of directors, curators, keepers and partners, 85 AZA-accredited zoos and aquariums reported spending more than $4.2 million to maintain, adapt and expand amphibian conservation programs in 2014. The stories in this report are drawn primarily from annual submissions to AZA’s field conservation database (available when logged into AZA’s website under “Conservation”), as well as from articles submitted directly to AZA. They share the successes and advances in the areas of reintroduction and research, conservation breeding and husbandry and citizen science and community engagement. These efforts are the result of extensive collaborations and multi-year (even multi-decadal!) commitments. AZA congratulates each of the members included in this report for their dedication, and encourages other facilities to become involved. The ATAG has many resources to help people get started or to expand their engagement in amphibian conservation, and people are also welcome to contact the facilities included in this report or the ATAG Chair, Diane Barber ([email protected]). Cover: Spring peeper (Pseudacris crucifer). Widespread throughout the eastern United States and with a familiar call to many, the spring peeper was the most frequently reported frog by FrogWatch USA volunteers in 2014. Although reports of spring peepers began in February, they peaked in April.
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Black Warrior Waterdog Status
    STATE : Alabama PROJECT NUMBER: E-1 SEGMENT: 2 STUDY NUMBER: 5 BLACK WARRIOR WATERDOG STATUS SURVEY FINAL REPORT 1991-92 BY MARK A. BAILEY Dece:nber, 1992 Approved by: FINAL REPORT State: Alabama Study Title: Black Warrior Waterdog Status Survey Study No. 5 Project Title: Alabama Endangered Wildlife Projects Project No. E-1 Period Covered: 1 December 1990 to 30 September 1992 Prepared by: Alabama Natural Heritage Program Mark A. Bailey, Principal Investigator Notice of nomenclatural conventions used in this report: In the absence of a Latin name, and for the sake of clarity and convenience, the undescribed Nectwus of the upper Black Warrior River system will be referred to by its generally accepted common name, the Black Warrior waterdog. Despite uncertainty over the proper taxonomic placement of other species (N. beyeri and/or N. a/abamensis) with which the Black Warrior waterdog is sympatric in the lower portion of its range, it/they will be referred to as N. a/abamensis. Abstract: The Black Warrior waterdog, an undescribed form of Necturus endemic to the upper Black Warrior River system of Alabama, was surveyed for at 66 sites in nine counties from November, 1990 to February, 1992. Although gilled larvae of other salamander genera including Desmognathus, Eurycea, and Pseudotriton were encountered at 28 (45%) of the 62 sites sampled by netting, Necturus specimens referable to the Black Warrior waterdog were found at only four (6%) of the 66 sites netted and/or trapped: the Sipsey Fork of the Black Warrior River, Wmston County (six adults, one larva); Lost Creek, Walker County (one adult); North River and Yellow Creek, Tuscaloosa County (one larva and one subadult, respectively).
    [Show full text]
  • Amphibian Taxon Advisory Group Regional Collection Plan
    1 Table of Contents ATAG Definition and Scope ......................................................................................................... 4 Mission Statement ........................................................................................................................... 4 Addressing the Amphibian Crisis at a Global Level ....................................................................... 5 Metamorphosis of the ATAG Regional Collection Plan ................................................................. 6 Taxa Within ATAG Purview ........................................................................................................ 6 Priority Species and Regions ........................................................................................................... 7 Priority Conservations Activities..................................................................................................... 8 Institutional Capacity of AZA Communities .............................................................................. 8 Space Needed for Amphibians ........................................................................................................ 9 Species Selection Criteria ............................................................................................................ 13 The Global Prioritization Process .................................................................................................. 13 Selection Tool: Amphibian Ark’s Prioritization Tool for Ex situ Conservation ..........................
    [Show full text]
  • DEPARTMENT of the INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 01/13/2016 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2016-00452, and on FDsys.gov DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 16 RIN 1018–BA77 [Docket No. FWS–HQ–FAC–2015–0005] [FXFR13360900000–156–FF09F14000] Injurious Wildlife Species; Listing Salamanders Due to Risk of Salamander Chytrid Fungus AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Interim rule; request for comments; notice of availability of economic analysis. 1 SUMMARY: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is amending its regulations under the Lacey Act to add all species of salamanders from 20 genera, of which there are 201 species, to the list of injurious amphibians. With this interim rule, both importation into the United States and interstate transportation between States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or any territory or possession of the United States of any live or dead specimen, including parts, of these 20 genera of salamanders are prohibited, except by permit for zoological, educational, medical, or scientific purposes (in accordance with permit conditions) or by Federal agencies without a permit solely for their own use. This action is necessary to protect the interests of wildlife and wildlife resources from the introduction, establishment, and spread of the chytrid fungus Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans into ecosystems of the United States. The fungus affects salamanders, with lethal effects on many species, and is not yet known to be found in the United States. Because of the devastating effect that we expect the fungus will have on native U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Abundance of Gulf Coast Waterdogs (Necturus Beyeri) Along Bayou Lacombe, Saint Tammany Parish, Louisiana
    Abundance of Gulf Coast Waterdogs (Necturus beyeri) along Bayou Lacombe, Saint Tammany Parish, Louisiana Authors: Glorioso, Brad M., Waddle, J. Hardin, Muse, Lindy J., and Godfrey, Sidney T. Source: Journal of Herpetology, 55(2) : 160-166 Published By: Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles URL: https://doi.org/10.1670/20-062 BioOne Complete (complete.BioOne.org) is a full-text database of 200 subscribed and open-access titles in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Complete website, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/terms-of-use. Usage of BioOne Complete content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non - commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. Downloaded From: https://bioone.org/journals/Journal-of-Herpetology on 18 Jun 2021 Terms of Use: https://bioone.org/terms-of-use Access provided by University of Florida Journal of Herpetology, Vol. 55, No. 2, 160–166, 2021 Copyright 2021 Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles Abundance of Gulf Coast Waterdogs (Necturus beyeri) along Bayou Lacombe, Saint Tammany Parish, Louisiana 1,4 1,2 1 1,3 BRAD M. GLORIOSO, J. HARDIN WADDLE, LINDY J. MUSE, AND SIDNEY T.
    [Show full text]
  • Black Warrior Waterdog (Necturus Alabamensis)
    FINAL REPORT Habitat Assessment of Known Occurrences Black Warrior Waterdog (Necturus alabamensis) Sipsey Fork below AL Hwy 33 bridge (Winston County) and at Lewis Smith Dam (Walker/Cullman counties) Photos by M. Bailey Order No. 1448-43910-99-M515 March 2000 Prepared for U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service by Mark A. Bailey, Conservation Services Southeast 2040 Old Federal Road Shorter, AL 36075 (334) 727-2040 fax (334) 727-1005 Contents Introduction.................................................................................................................................1 Background ......................................................................................................................1 Historic Sites.....................................................................................................................3 Objectives ....................................................................................................................................5 Methods........................................................................................................................................5 Investigators.....................................................................................................................5 Determination of Site Condition and Status................................................................6 Site Assessments.........................................................................................................................7 Summary and Conclusion ......................................................................................................19
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 81, No. 8/Wednesday, January 13, 2016
    1534 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 13, 2016 / Rules and Regulations If . Then include . ******* (j) the estimated value of the acquisition exceeds $10 million ................ 52.222–24 Pre-award On-site Equal Opportunity Compliance Evalua- tion. (k) the contracting officer requires cost or pricing data for work or serv- 52.215–10 Price Reduction for Defective Certified Cost or Pricing Data. ices exceeding the threshold identified in FAR 15.403–4. 52.215–12 Subcontractor Certified Cost or Pricing Data. ******* [FR Doc. 2016–00475 Filed 1–12–16; 8:45 am] DATES: This interim rule is effective as the offspring or eggs of any of the BILLING CODE 6820–161–P of January 28, 2016. Interested persons foregoing that are injurious to human are invited to submit written comments beings, to the interests of agriculture, on this interim rule on or before March horticulture, or forestry, or to the DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 14, 2016 wildlife or wildlife resources of the ADDRESSES: You may submit comments United States. Fish and Wildlife Service by any of the following methods: We have determined that salamanders • Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// that can carry the fungus 50 CFR Part 16 www.regulations.gov. Search for Docket Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans (Bsal) are injurious to wildlife and RIN 1018–BA77 No. FWS–HQ–FAC–2015–0005 and follow the instructions for submitting wildlife resources of the United States. [Docket No. FWS–HQ–FAC–2015–0005; comments. This determination was based on a FXFR13360900000–156–FF09F14000] • Mail, Hand Delivery, or Courier: review of the literature and an Public Comments Processing, Attn: evaluation under the criteria for Injurious Wildlife Species; Listing FWS–HQ–FAC–2015–0005; Division of injuriousness by the Service.
    [Show full text]
  • AMPHIBIANS and REPTILES of ALABAMA Conservation Status of Species and Selected Subspecies Alabama Natural Heritage Program June
    AMPHIBIANS AND REPTILES OF A LABAMA Conservation status of species and selected subspecies Alabama Natural Heritage Program June 24, 1994 Global State USFWS AL CLASS AMPHIBIA ANURA: Frogs & toads BUFONIDAE Bufo americanus . American toad . GS SS Bufo quercicus . oak toad . GS S5 Bufo terrestris . southern toad . GS SS Bufo woodhousii . Fowler's toad 0 • 0 ••• 0 0 • 0 •• 0 0 GS SS HYLIDAE Acris crepitans . 0 0 0 • 0 0 ••• 0 •••• 0 ••• northern cricket frog 0 • 0 0 0 0 • 0 0 GS S5 Acris gryllus . 0 • • • • • • • • •• 0 • ••• 0 ••• southern cricket frog .... 0 •••• G5 Ss p Hyla andersonii 0 • 0 0 ••••••••• 0 •• 0 • Pine Barrens treefrog .. 0 • 0 • 0 0 • G4 S2 Hyla avivoca 0 • 0 ••• 0 0 0 • • • • 0 •• 0 0 • • 0 bird-voiced treefrog 0 0 • 0 0 • 0 0 •• GS SS Hyla chrysoscelis . 0 • 0 ••••••• 0 • 0 •• 0 Cope's gray treefrog 0 •••• 0 •• 0 GS S5 Hyla cinerea ............ 0 •••••• • • green treefrog . .... 0 GS SS Hyla femora/is 0 • 0 0 0 •••• 0 ••• 0 ••• 0 0 pine woods treefrog 0 • 0 •••• 0 0 • G5 S5 Hyla gratiosa 0 0 0 0 • 0 0 0 •• 0 • 0 •• 0 • 0 •• barking treefrog 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 0 •• 0 •• GS SS Hyla squirella . 0 ••••••• 0 ••••••• o •• squirrel treefrog . 0 GS S5 Pseudacris brachyphona .. 0 0 • • • • • •• mountain chorus frog 0 0 •• 0 0 0 • 0 GS SS Pseudacris crucifer 0 0 0 •• 0 •••• 0 • 0 0 0 spring peeper 0 0 • 0 • 0 0 • 0 • 0 0 •• GS SS Pseudacris nigrita . 0 • • • • • • • southern chorus frog ... 0 • 0 0 •• G5 S5 Pseudacris ocularis .
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the Natural Communities of Florida
    GUIDE TO THE NATURAL COMMUNITIES OF FLORIDA Prepared by the Florida Natural Areas Inventory and Florida Department of Natural Resources February 1990 Table of Contents Page Introduction....................................................................……….........................………… 1 Table 1: Florida Natural Areas Inventory Natural Community Rank…………………… 3 Natural Community Descriptions TERRESTRIAL XERIC UPLANDS Sandhill...............................................................……….……….. 5 Scrub.....................................................................……...……….. 5 Xeric Hammock.....................................................…….………... 6 COASTAL UPLANDS Beach Dune……….…………………………………………….. 8 Coastal Berm.......................................................…………….…. 9 Coastal Grassland............................................……………….…. 9 Coastal Rock Barren........................................……………….…. 10 Coastal Strand................................................…………………... 11 Maritime Hammock.........................................………………….. 11 Shell Mound.................................................………………….…. 12 MESIC UPLANDS Slope Forest.....................................…………………………..… 14 Upland Glade...............................……………………………..… 15 Upland Hardwood Forest...............…………………….…….…. 16 Upland Mixed Forest...................…………………………….…. 16 Upland Pine Forest........................……………………………… 17 ROCKLANDS Pine Rockland................................……………………….…….. 19 Rockland Hammock........................…………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Number 10 February 1985 EDITORIAL STAFF
    All ct«te •«' Carolina ^ number 10 february 1985 EDITORIAL STAFF John E. Cooper, Editor Alexa C. Williams, Managing Editor John B. Funderburg, Editor-in-Chief Board Alvin L. Braswell, Curator of David S. Lee, Chief Curator Lower Vertebrates, N.C. of Birds, N.C State Museum State Museum John C. Clamp, Associate Curator William M. Palmer, Chief Curator (Invertebrates), N.C of Lower Vertebrates, N.C State Museum State Museum James W. Hardin, Department Rowland M. Shelley, Chief of Botany, N.C State Curator of Invertebrates, N.C. University State Museum Brimleyana, the Journal of the North Carolina State Museum of Natural His- tory, will appear at irregular intervals in consecutively numbered issues. Con- tents will emphasize zoology of the southeastern United States, especially North Carolina and adjacent areas. Geographic coverage will be limited to Alabama, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia. Subject matter will focus on taxonomy and systematics, ecology, zoo- geography, evolution, and behavior. Subdiscipline areas will include general invertebrate zoology, ichthyology, herpetology, ornithology, mammalogy, and paleontology. Papers will stress the results of original empirical field studies, but synthesizing reviews and papers of significant historical interest to southeastern zoology will be included. Suitability of manuscripts will be determined by the Editor, and where neces- sary, the Editorial Board. Appropriate specialists will review each manuscript judged suitable, and final acceptability will be determined by the Editor. Address manuscripts and all correspondence (except that relating to subscrip- tions and exchange) to Editor, Brimleyana, N. C. State Museum of Natural History, P.
    [Show full text]