DOCSLIB.ORG

The Collaboration Issue

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Collaboration Issue J O U R N A L O F T H E S O U T H W E S T D O C T O R A L T R A I N I N G P A R T N E R S H I P THE OPEN REVIEW THE COLLABORATION ISSUE V O L U M E 6 W W W . T H E O P E N R E V I E W . C O M 2 0 2 0 N O V E M B E R 2 0 2 0 V O L U M E 6 A C K N O W L E D G E M E N T S A big thank you to... All of the staff at the South West Doctoral Training Partnership EDITORS Emily Clifford / Eleanor Wolff / Abbie Ball / Mollie Gascoigne / Nicole Russell Pascual / Sarah Hendry / Sylvia Hayes / Benji Woolf / Will King CONTRIBUTORS Jed Hilton / Kensa Broadhurst / Grace Baptie / Elena Mueller Januário / Alyson Norman / Harriet Earle-Brown / Samir Sweida-Metwally / Arabella Comyn / Lívia Maria Borges Silva / Annayah Prosser / Philippa Juliet Meek-Smith / Catherine Cartwright / Hannah West / Mary Pearson COVER ART Catherine Cartwright, visual artist and PhD researcher University of Exeter (Human Geography), University of West of England (Centre for Fine Print Research). Funded by AHRC SWW Doctoral Training Partnership. Creativity and collaboration are central to Catherine's research, both in the questions she seeks to answer and in the methodology. Her PhD is about participatory art and its relationship with trauma, approaching the topic within the emerging subfield of geographies of trauma. Trauma is commonplace and exists in people’s lives through past and recent experience and through structures of bias and discrimination. Its painful manifestations affect people’s emotions and behaviour. Participatory artists work with people where collaborative art-making is the focus. Her research investigates how participatory artists can best work with people who are affected by trauma, in a positive and creative environment. Catherine will be running a participatory art project with Devon Rape Crisis and Sexual Abuse Services, as well as undertaking interviews with participatory artists. The art project will happen over a 10-12 month period where she will work one to one with individual service users creating artist-book-portraits. Through these methods she hopes to understand how people, space and place collaborate in trauma-informed arts practice. Catherine has been running art projects with vulnerable groups and, in particular, women affected by abuse, over the past 10 years, in addition to undertaking commissions and exhibiting. Recent commissions include the National Memorial Arboretum (2018) for their Armistice commemorations and the University of Exeter (2019) #Urgency commission on facial recognition technologies. Exhibitions include, New York’s International Print Center (New Prints 2018) and Bury Art Museum (Prints: A Catalyst for Change 2019). www.catherinecartwright.co.uk 1 | THE OPEN REVIEW N O V E M B E R 2 0 2 0 V O L U M E 6 Welcome to The Open Review L E T T E R F R O M T H E E D I T O R S Dear Readers, At the start of 2020, the TOR editorial committee met in person, filled with optimism at the prospect of having a collaborative theme to the journal - not realising this would be the only time we would see each other face-to-face all year. 2020 has been a year that has truly brought new meaning to the theme for this year’s journal: collaboration. As researchers, we collaborate to improve our research, we collaborate for our well-being and we collaborate to open our eyes to new ideas. While collaboration was the theme for the journal, it became more of a challenge for the editorial team when the pandemic struck. Despite the challenges of not having all editors fully acquainted in person, we set to work organising the job at hand. As a result, collaboration this year took on a very practical nature. The members of the editorial team are based at multiple different universities and we were all working remotely. Collaboration happened across borders from our authors and peer-reviewers and across mediums for the submissions to the journals, from our fantastic contributions to the wonderful visual art presented on the front cover. Finding ‘hope’ and ‘certainty’ are central themes within Catherine’s artwork and these themes have been brought out through the collaborative work at the heart of creating this journal. This year has been very challenging and collaboration has undoubtedly helped keep those feelings of hope and certainty alive. It is perhaps through this necessity that the collaborative process worked so well for us, resulting in a final product that we are all very proud of. The Open Review is a journal that is focused on providing a constructive, friendly but also rigorous environment for students to gain important experience in publishing and peer-reviewing. It is a student-led, open-access, peer-reviewed social sciences journal run through the South West Doctoral Training Partnership and this is the sixth edition of our annual journal. We would like to extend a huge thank you to our contributors, our peer-reviewers and the team at the SWDTP for all of their hard work and support that has resulted in such a fantastic journal. We hope you enjoy reading this year’s edition of TOR! Emily, Eleanor, Abbie, Mollie, Nicole, Sarah, Sylvia, Benji, and Will 2 | THE OPEN REVIEW N O V E M B E R 2 0 2 0 V O L U M E 6 C O N T E N T S Collaboration: Exploring the PGR Superpower for Addressing 5 Inequalities within Academia Annayah M.B. Prosser, University of Bath Painting the Nails of Homeless Women: Using Manicures as a 14 Methodological Tool Harriet Earle-Brown, University of Exeter The Death and Subsequent Revival of the Cornish Language 20 Kensa Broadhurst, University of Exeter "Bound to be responsible": the Tasmanian Greens' and the 1996- 28 1998 Liberal minority government Arabella Comyn, Wageningen University and Research These shoes and this handbag 44 Hannah West, University of Bath Birth trauma from the perspective of perinatal counsellors 45 Grace Baptie, Elena Mueller Januário, Alyson Norman, University of Plymouth Divorced Eggs and the Culinary Field: Bourdieu, Field Theory, and 58 the Chef Jed Hilton, University of Exeter Book Review: Megan Goodwin (2020) Abusing Religion: Literary 67 Persecution, Sex Scandals and American Minority Religions. Philippa Juliet Meek-Smith, University of Exeter 3 | THE OPEN REVIEW N O V E M B E R 2 0 2 0 V O L U M E 6 C O N T E N T S The Border in Ireland 70 Mary Pearson, University of Plymouth Why Britain should not follow Germany's approach to recognising 73 its racist legacy Samir Sweida-Metwally, University of Bristol The COVID-19 pandemic and the degrowth movement: Reframing 80 and rethinking economic and social relations Lívia Maria Borges Silva, University Institute of Lisbon 4 | THE OPEN REVIEW h t t p s : / / d o i . o r g / 1 0 . 4 7 9 6 7 / Q K T Y 9 2 1 6 N O V E M B E R 2 0 2 0 V O L U M E 6 C O L L A B O R A T I O N : E X P L O R I N G T H E P G R S U P E R P O W E R F O R A D D R E S S I N G I N E Q U A L I T I E S W I T H I N A C A D E M I A Annayah M.B. Prosser University of Bath Abstract Inequalities within academia are rampant. Sexism, racism, classism and discrimination impose huge barriers to those entering academic work or study. These issues are amplified in times of crisis, such as COVID-19. As postgraduate researchers, we can often feel powerless to address these inequalities. We possess little status in academic power structures, and as such it can be difficult to ‘rock the boat’ or diverge from normalised patterns of discrimination within our fields. In this essay, I argue that while we may lack status, we can adapt and diversify our collaborations with others to effectively address inequality. I outline how collaboration can be a vital tool for elevating underrepresented voices within and outside academia and examine how students with funding in particular can play an important role in this. In diversifying our citations, networks and methods of collaboration, we can ensure increasing opportunities are available for underrepresented groups throughout the academic pipeline. As the next generation of scholars, postgraduate researchers can change the game for underrepresented groups, and ensuring we collaborate diversely is our superpower for doing so. I. What can I offer? What can I learn? researchers we shape the future of our Academia as a profession lacks diversity. profession, but with lower status in our Many different demographic groups are fields it can be difficult for us to alter or underrepresented within academic career question existing power structures and paths. In longitudinal studies of academic inequalities (Maritz and Prinsloo 2015). faculty, male academics are consistently While these inequalities are overwhelming, paid more than women, and are more likely and structural in nature, this article offers to be employed on full time contracts some first steps for how postgraduate (Freund et al. 2016). According to the students may begin to address inequality in Higher Education Statistics Agency, in their work, by shedding light on broad 2018 only 18% of academics in the UK methods for diversifying collaboration.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Newsletter for the Huon Valley Environment Centre Winter/Spring
    HAVOC Newsletter for the Huon Valley Environment Centre Winter/Spring Edition HVEC is a non-profit, volunteer organisation with a vision, for the people of the world to experience in the Huon Valley a community committed to living harmoniously with their natural environment. Committee Members Convenor: Adam Burling Treasurer: Jenny Weber Secretary: Loki Maxwell Education: Rob Sheehan Centre Co-ordination: Jamie Ward Fundraising: Daynu Other Key Positions Public Officer: Lilian Komzak Membership Co-ordinators: Karen & Chris ([email protected]) Volunteer Co-ordinator: Aviva Hannah Librarian: Robyn Von Bernburg Retail Manager: Shar Molloy HAVOC is published several times a year and is designed and edited by Melanie Simon; contributions of relevant articles and images or artwork from members are welcomed. All material for this newsletter is donated and HVEC do not take responsibility for the opinions expressed herein. HUON VALLEY ENVIRONMENT CENTRE INC. 3/17 Wilmot Rd, P.O. Box 217 HUONVILLE, 7109 Phone: 03 6264 1286 Fax: 03 6264 1243 Email: [email protected] Website: www.huon.org Dear HVEC member, You are invited to attend the opening of ‘weld echo’, presented by the Black Sassy Collective, at the Riverside Pavilion, Mawson’s place, Hobart, on Friday the 2nd of September 2005 @ 6pm. Official opening will be by Bob Brown who will introduce you to glimpses of an endangered valley, a collaborative exhibition of Weld inspired art. Then on Sunday the 11th of September, come to an auction of the art at Sirens (Victoria St, Hobart) at 4.30pm. There will be entertainment by the Stiff Gins. Entry $5, proceeds to the Weld Valley Campaign, for more info go to www.huon.org.
    [Show full text]
  • Tasmania's Native Vegetation Policy
    TASMANIA’S NATIVE VEGETATION POLICY: TOWARDS AN INTEGRATED FRAMEWORK By STEPHEN HARRIS BSc (Hons), MSc Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Tasmania March 2011 i STATEMENT OF ORIGINALITY This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in any University, and to the best of my knowledge, contains no copy or paraphrase of material previously written or published by any other person except where due reference is given in the text. Stephen Harris University of Tasmania HOBART March 2011 ii STATEMENT OF AUTHORITY OF ACCESS This thesis is not to be made available for loan or copying for two years following the date this statement was signed. Following that time the thesis may be made available for loan and limited copying in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968. Stephen Harris University of Tasmania HOBART March 2011 iii STATEMENT OF CO-AUTHORSHIP The following people and institutions contributed to the publication of the work undertaken as part of this thesis: Harris, Shaw and Crane (2009) on ex situ conservation planning for Tasmania. S. Harris (60%), J. Shaw, University of Stellenbosch (25%) and N. Crane, Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment (15%) Details of authors’ roles: S. Harris made key contribution to the formulation and development of the idea, sourced relevant data and information, and directed and led the preparation and refinement of initial and successive drafts. J. Shaw contributed to the development of the paper, sourced some data on threatened species and provided input on the early drafts of the paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Paradoxes of Protection Evolution of the Tasmanian Parks and Wildlife Service and National Parks and Reserved Lands System
    Paradoxes of Protection Evolution of the Tasmanian Parks and Wildlife Service and National Parks and Reserved Lands System By Dr Louise Crossley May 2009 A Report for Senator Christine Milne www.christinemilne.org.au Australian Greens Cover image: Lake Gwendolen from the track to the summit of Frenchmans Cap, Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area Photo: Matt Newton Photography Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................. 1 1. THE INITIAL ESTABLISHMENT OF PARKS AND RESERVES; UTILITARIANS VERSUS CONSERVATIONISTS 1915-1970....................................................................... 3 1.1 The Scenery Preservation Board as the first manager of reserved lands ............................................................ 3 1.2 Extension of the reserved lands system ................................................................................................................... 3 1.3The wilderness value of wasteland ........................................................................................................................... 4 1.4 Inadequacies of the Scenery Protection Board ...................................................................................................... 4 2. THE ESTABLISHMENT AND ‘GLORY DAYS’ OF THE NATIONAL PARKS AND WILDLIFE SERVICE 1971-81 ........................................................................................... 6 2.1 The demise of the Scenery Preservation Board and the Lake Pedder controversy
    [Show full text]
  • Structure and Ideology in the Tasmanian Labor Party
    Structure and Ideology in the Tasmanian Labor Party: Postmaterialism and Party change ,- By Peter James Patmore LL.B., Dip. Crim. Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements fo r the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Tasmania, March 2000 II This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for a degree or diploma by the University or any other institution, except by way of background information and duly acknowledged in the thesis, and to the best of my knowledge and belief no material previously pubJished or written by another person except where due acknowledgment is made in the text ofthe thesis. ................�................. �---=;,.......... Peter Patmore 23" February 2000. III This thesis is not to be made available for loan or copying for two years fo llowing the date this statement is signed. Following that time the thesis may be made available for loan and limited copying in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968. Peter Pa tmore 23'" February 2000 iv ABSTRACT The Tasmanian Labor Party has found itself, like many western social democratic parties, recently subject to challenge; not from its traditional enemy, the economic right, but froma new postmaterialist left. This thesis considers the concept of postmaterialism, its rise and role in the fo rmation of new ecocentric political parties, and its impact on the structure, ideology and electoral strategy of the Tasmanian Labor Party. Maurice Duverger's typology of political parties has been used to elucidate and consider the characteristics and fo rmation of political parties and the importance of electoral systems - particularly proportional representation - in achieving representational success.
    [Show full text]
  • Inaugural Speech – Felix Ashton Ellis MP
    Terry Martin MLC Legislative Council Date: 18 May 2004 Electorate: Elwick FORMER PREMIER, JIM BACON Mr AIRD (Derwent - Leader of the Government in the Council - Motion) - Mr President, I move – That the Legislative Council places on record its deep appreciation to the former Premier, Jim Bacon, for his outstanding contribution to the Tasmanian people as a member of parliament from 1996 until 2004, as Leader of the Parliamentary Labor Party from 1997 to 2004 and as Premier of the State from 1998 to 2004. The Legislative Council pays tribute to a great Tasmanian, and wishes him and his wife Honey the very best for the future. Mr PRESIDENT - The question is that the motion be agreed to. The honourable member for Elwick has the call and as this is the honourable member's inaugural speech, I know that all honourable members will extend to him the usual courtesies. Mr MARTIN (Elwick - Inaugural) - Mr President, I do understand that it is normal practice for new members to give themselves at least a few days to settle in before making their inaugural speech and when they do so, it is quite normal to talk about what motivated them to stand for the Legislative Council and what they hope to achieve. However, I have found myself in somewhat of a predicament for when I realised that this motion was before the Council I felt that I simply would not be able to sit there without commenting on this motion in order to place on record not only my enormous respect for Jim Bacon and my gratitude for the contribution he has made to the State but also to express the heartfelt respect and gratitude of the majority of my constituents.
    [Show full text]
  • Firearms Legislation & Policy
    HOUSE OF ASSEMBLY SELECT COMMITTEE FIREARMS LEGISLATION AND POLICY Submission by: Ronald Cornish Tel: BACKGROUND: In 1996 I was a Minister in the Rundle Government, responsible for the introduction of Firearm Law Reform agreed to by the Federal Government and all State and Territory Governments in Australia, in the form of the National Firearms Agreement (NFA). As Leader of the House of Assembly, I was part of the negotiating team of Messrs Tony Rundle (Premier), John Beswick (Responsible Minister), Michael Field (Leader of the Opposition) and Christine Milne (Leader of the Greens), which agreed to the National Firearms Agreement provisions and passed them through the House of Assembly without amendment. In preparing this submission, I consulted John Beswick, the responsible Minister for carriage of the legislation, who provided me with the following information (comments) which I believe to be very relevant and provides the background to the introduction of the Rundle Government’s Firearm Law Reforms: - “While John Howard is rightly given a lot of the credit for leading the charge and being very strong in insisting that the integrity of the proposed legislation was not compromised, the actual form of the legislation was thrashed out by the State Ministers and Attorneys General in several meetings which I attended on behalf of Tasmania. The first meeting was attended by the Prime Minister and Tony Rundle as Premier of Tasmania, but no other Premiers attended. John Howard had spoken to them beforehand and got them to agree to what he wanted to do. There was another meeting at which John Howard intervened to ensure that a particular proposal, that would have weakened the legislation, was not adopted.
    [Show full text]
  • The Regional Forest Agreement and the Use of Publicly Owned
    The Regional Forest Agreement and the use of publicly owned native forests in Tasmania: an investigation into key decision making processes, policies, outcomes and opportunities. By Ula Majewski BA (Hon.) University of Tasmania A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for a Master of Environmental Management Degree at the School of Geography and Environmental Studies, University of Tasmania (November, 2007). it 1 • ■ .• 4.4 i'M40 • II.' l'I'll i 1 1 • 40 ' i', • . J! I' or. jo s 4 4,-,. c I , • lei / .• 1 • •• i • • . , • 4, : 1 % ,11;1441,. ' ,I • 11 i 0 r i• Ai, . ' • 1 4 r ' • ' 4 , i0 • Yr 4 kiti , ,A , , . .4, . to t ir w , Dedicated to my dear friend Ben Morrow, A whose fine intellect, courage, passion and spirit 4 % 1. • r , are a continual inspiration. ,112 a11 d , \PS 4 I f 4 I ; .,„:,,„,„ ••■4 •' 40 ,:vi 1,,s,i4 DECLARATION This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in any tertiary institution, and to the best of my knowledge and belief, contains no material previously published or written by another person, except where due reference is made in the text of the thesis. Ursula Majewski BA (Hon) iv ABSTRACT The Tasmanian Regional Forest Agreement is a defining policy tool that governs the use and management of the publicly owned native forests positioned at the centre of one of the most protracted and conflict-ridden debates over natural resource management in Australia's history. Drawing on multi-disciplinary discourses and data, and employing a qualitative approach including interviews with prominent participants in the RFA process and implementation, this thesis examines key aspects of the conflict, positions Tasmania's forestry system within a national and global environmental policy context, and undertakes a critical analysis of the scientific, political and governance processes and outcomes generated by the Tasmanian Regional Forest Agreement.
    [Show full text]
  • Document: Having Regard to Matters Raised by Senator Kroger Relating To
    Re: The Referral to the Senate Committee of Privileges of a matter concerning Senators Brown and Milne Second Submission on behalf of Senators Brown and Milne in relation to Senator Kroger’s allegations Introduction 1. This submission, which has also been settled by Ron Merkel QC and Frances Gordon of counsel, is the second submission1 provided in response to the letters dated 24 November 2011 from Senator Johnston to Senators Brown and Milne seeking their comments in respect of a matter referred to the Committee of Privileges relating to “political donations made by Mr Graeme Wood, arrangements surrounding the sale of the Triabunna woodchip mill by Gunns Ltd and questions without notice asked by Senators Brown and Senator Milne” (the “referred matter”). Comments were sought on the “terms of reference and, in particular, on the matters canvassed in Senator Kroger’s letter to the President” (the “Kroger letter”). 2. This submission is provided in the context of the following explanation of the present process, provided by the Secretary to the Committee, Mr Pye, in a letter dated 6 January 2012: It is important to note that in this initial stage the committee is not investigating any particular allegations; rather it is seeking to establish the facts of the matters referred… Should the committee consider that any particular allegations arise against any person which require investigation, the committee is bound to pursue those allegations in accordance with the Senate Privilege Resolutions, which include provisions directed at procedural fairness or natural justice. 3. Accordingly, Senators Brown and Milne understand that the present task of the Committee is to consider whether the matter referred to it “gives rise to any 1 The first submission, provided to the Committee on 8 February 2012, addressed the requirements of procedural fairness.
    [Show full text]
  • Strained Parliamentary Relations Green-Supported Minority Government in Tasmania
    Strained Parliamentary Relations Green-supported minority government in Tasmania Kate Crowley* This article takes Strom’s1 and Moon’s2 discussion of minority regimes and explores it in the Tasmanian context by reviewing the Labor–Green Accord (1989–92) and the Liberal–Green Alliance (1996–98) governments. It argues that these Green-supported minority governments in Tasmania, while short-lived and contentious, have had significant positive implications for public policy and the shaping of politics, and for not entirely precluding, in fact for encouraging, reform agendas. Indeed, it is argued that they illustrate Kingdon’s notion of policy windows whereby problems, policies and politics come together at critical times, in times of crisis for instance, and facilitate fundamental policy innovation and change. The article characterises Green minority government in Tasmania, examines the circumstances that led to its creation, acknowledges the ideological strain of Greens partnering government, but concludes that Green minority government offers significant reform opportunities. By considering these two very different governments, this paper adds empirical justification to Strom’s and Green–Pedersen’s3 case that minority governments are far from passive and constrained in terms of governing capacity. * Graduate Coordinator of Public Policy, School of Government, University of Tasmania. Dr Crowley teaches environmental politics and policy. She is widely published on environmental politics and policy, and is co-editor of Australian Environmental Policy: Studies in Decline & Devolution (with Ken Walker), UNSWPress, Kensington, NSW. 1 K. Strom, Minority Government and Majority Rule, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990. 2 J. Moon ‘Minority Government in the Australian States: From Ersatz Majoritarianism to Minoritarianism’, Australian Journal of Political Science, 31: Special issue on Consensus Policy- Making, 1995, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • LETTER from CANBERRA TASMANIAN VIEWPOINT: GREG BARNS Saving You Time
    7 June to 19 July 2011 LETTER FROM CANBERRA TASMANIAN VIEWPOINT: GREG BARNS Saving you time. Three years on. After Letter from Melbourne, established 1994. A monthly newsletter distilling public policy and government decisions which affect business opportunities in Australia and beyond. LETTER TheFROM Tasmanian Parliament’s CANBERRA upper house, the Legislative Council, is a unique beast in Australian politics. It is controlled by Independents and its electoral system and cycle Carbon Edition 7 June to 19 July 2011 Issue 35 Letter from Canberra is a monthly newsletterbears distilling no relationship public to thatpolicy of the and lower government house, LETTERthe House decisions FROMof Assembly. that CANBERRA effect business opportunities in Australia and beyond. You only need to be on a trip to miss out on the context of important stories. In a world of wall-to-wallThe information Legislative Council overload, is arguably we have Australia’s been onlysummarizing genuine house the of media review. and In classic Westminster constitutional theory, the upper house is not controlled by the executive and OUR MISSING GEOGRAPHY coffee-shop gossip for 18 years now, alongoperates with Letter to scrutinise from andMelbourne reviews bills.. This is the Tasmanian experience. !"#$%$#"&'()$*($+,-./01#,2)$'")(/1"3$ '/(,-!!"#4)/1 LESSONS... Letter)56789:6;$6;<=9;$>?$/8@=6;9$%A?A$BCD$E=$:C@=$@F;$D9BG$@=$G:C$%$C:EF@7H$:C8I5D:CE$69;BJ<B7@$<=9$@G=H$B@$(F;$'=@;I$!:CD7=9K from Canberra is focused on the interfaceThe Legislative of business Council and consists government, of 15 MPs. with They enoughrepresent politics single member and policy background to enable you to grasp anyconstituencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Experiences of the Tasmanian Greens: the Politics of the Periphery1
    in Ecopolitics: Thought and Action, Vol 1, No 1, 2000, pp. 53-71. Parliamentary Experiences of the Tasmanian Greens: The Politics of the Periphery1 i Kate Crowley ABSTRACT This paper reflects upon the green political trajectory in Tasmania from the founding in 1972 of the world's first green2 party, the United Tasmania Group, to the recent 'electoral reform’ that in effect disenfranchised most of the Tasmanian parliamentary greens (Crowley, 2000). It argues that green politics, whilst fundamentally transforming the island state of Tasmania in part through its nature conservation successes, has remained a politics at the periphery that is resisted by both the major parties. This peripheralisation is not entirely owed to the green's longstanding pursuit of wilderness preservation, however, but also to their preoccupation both with progressive politics and democratic accountability that has led them into state parliament where they have twice achieved the balance of power (Crowley, 1996; 1999b). This paper recounts familiar terrain with its description of Tasmania as a conservative, economically marginal island state that has pursued a development formula based upon resource exploitation and hydroindustrialisation that went unchallenged until the rise of the greens. It shows how Tasmania's green politics, perhaps unlike green politics in more vital, less marginal contexts, has been a politics of contrast and change, ecocentric to its core, but strategically concerned with broader social reformism. By considering the failure of both green minority governments (Labor-Green 1989-91; and Liberal-Green 1996-8), it further reinforces how much the major parties have resisted green efforts both to share the state political stage and to move more than rhetorically away from resource based developmentalism3.
    [Show full text]
  • Tasmania's Green Disease
    Tasmania’s Green Disease DAVID BARNETT Going Green is a great way to end up in the red. A look at the decay of the island State. ASMANIA is chronically ill herself as a national from the Green virus, and figure, and to win a seat wasting away. According to in the Tasmanian Leg- T the Australian Statistician, islative Assembly. Tasmania is the only State or Territory It is also Bob whose population will decline—regardless Hawke, who was Prime of which of the ABS’s three sets of assump- Minister when the tions are used about immigration, fertility Wesley Vale project Photo removed for reasons of copyright and interstate population flows. By the was proposed, and year 2051, Tasmania’s population will be Graham Richardson, down from its present level of 473,000 to Hawke’s environment either (depending on which set you adopt) minister. You should 462,100, 445,700 or 418,500 people. also include Tasma- Perhaps Tasmanians are fortunate that nian Senator Shayne their fertile and pleasant island has be- Murphy, although he come an economic backwater, and a place made his contribution for mainlanders to escape the hustle and as an official of the Construction, Forestry Robin Gray a thermal power station and bustle which goes along with economic and Mining Union (CFMEU). a lump of money to abandon the Franklin activity, the roar of urban traffic which is Tasmania’s unemployment rate is 10.6 project. the consequence of two cars in every ga- per cent, against a national average of 7.5 Gray saw himself as another Charles rage.
    [Show full text]