DOCSLIB.ORG

A Review of Linkage Mechanisms in Animal Joints and Related

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Review of Linkage Mechanisms in Animal Joints and Related Bioinspir. Biomim. 16 (2021) 041001 https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3190/abf744 OPEN ACCESS TOPICAL REVIEW A review of linkage mechanisms in animal joints and related RECEIVED bioinspired designs 12 October 2020 REVISED ∗ 29 January 2021 Stuart Burgess ACCEPTED FOR PUBLICATION Department of Mechanical Engineering, Bristol University, (currently Visiting Fellow, Clare Hall College, Cambridge), Bristol BS8 1TR, 13 April 2021 United Kingdom ∗ Author to whom any correspondence should be addressed. PUBLISHED 10 June 2021 E-mail: [email protected] Keywords: four-bar mechanisms, kinematic amplification, mechanical advantage, multi-functioning, linkage mechanisms Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence. Abstract Any further distribution This paper presents a review of biological mechanical linkage mechanisms. One purpose is to of this work must maintain attribution to identify the range of kinematic functions that they are able to perform. A second purpose is to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal review progress in bioinspired designs. Ten different linkage mechanisms are presented. They are citation and DOI. chosen because they cover a wide range of functionality and because they have potential for bioinspired design. Linkage mechanisms enable animal joints to perform highly sophisticated and optimised motions. A key function of animal linkage mechanisms is the optimisation of actuator location and mechanical advantage. This is crucially important for animals where space is highly constrained. Many of the design features used by engineers in linkage mechanisms are seen in nature, such as short coupler links, extended bars, elastic energy storage and latch mechanisms. However, animal joints contain some features rarely seen in engineering such as integrated cam and linkage mechanisms, nonplanar four-bar mechanisms, resonant hinges and highly redundant actuators. The extreme performance of animal joints together with the unusual design features makes them an important area of investigation for bioinspired designs. Whilst there has been significant progress in bioinspiration, there is the potential for more, especially in robotics where compactness is a key design driver. 1. Introduction Several types of articulating joints are found in animals such as hinge joints (planar rotation), spher- This paper presents a review of biological mechanical ical joints (rotation in any plane), gliding joints (lin- linkage mechanisms. One purpose is to identify the ear movements), saddle joints (biaxial rotation) and range of kinematic functions that they are able to per- condyloid joints (movements in two planes). These form. A second purpose is to review progress in bioin- joints can act individually, such as when a finger is spired designs. Ten different linkage mechanisms are moved just at the metacarpophalangeal joint, or they presented. They are chosen because they cover a wide can act in tandem such as when all three finger joints range of functionality and because they have potential move together to curl or straighten the fingers. In the for bioinspired design. case of linkage mechanisms, a number of joints are Linkage mechanisms such as four-bar mecha- constrained to move together via rigid links. When nisms are common in animal joints, particularly in hinge joints are used in a linkage mechanism, the fish jaws [1], lizard jaws [2], snake jaws [3], bird motions are planar. When spherical joints are used, wings [4] and mammalian limbs [5]. A comprehen- the motion can be nonplanar. sive study of the linkage mechanisms in animal joints Linkage mechanisms are very important in was carried out in 1996 by Muller [6]. However, sev- mechanical systems because they enable the optimi- eral new mechanisms in nature have been discov- sation of forces and motions [13–15]. One of the ered since then [7–12]. Also, the work in [6]did first recorded designs of linkage mechanisms was in not discuss bioinspired designs. There has been much 1784 when James Watt published his parallel four-bar recent research on bioinspired linkages, especially in linkage for converting rotary into linear motion the areas of air vehicles and robotics. in steam engines [16]. Since this time, four-bar © 2021 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd Bioinspir. Biomim. 16 (2021) 041001 Topical Rev iew Figure 1. Some key design functions and features of four-bar mechanisms: (a) amplification of force or movement via links of different lengths; (b) amplification of rotation via a short coupler link; (c) optimisation of direction of linear actuator via an extension bar; (d) compact layout through inversion; (e) remote grounding position via an extended bar; (f) locked mechanism through an over-centre position. Figure 2. Schematic of the inverted four-bar mechanism in the human knee joint [17](quads= quadricep muscles; hams = hamstring muscles). (a) Straight leg. (b) 120 degrees flexion. linkages have been used extensively in a wide range Figure 1(a) shows how a four-bar mechanism can of applications including: vehicle steering units, be used to amplify force (bar 1 input) or amplify windscreen wiper drives, vehicle window lifting movement (bar 2 input). By adjusting the length of mechanisms, crane level luffing systems, angle poise the bars, a vast range of motions of the coupler link is lamps, riser recliner chairs, up-and-over doors and possible. Figure 1(b) shows that if the coupler link is double-glazing window hinges. made relatively short, then the rotation of the coupler The ability of linkage mechanisms to fine-tune link is greatly amplified for a given rotation of bar 1 or mechanical performance is due to the very large range 2. Figure 1(b) also shows that by extending the cou- of possible layouts. To illustrate this, figure 1 sum- pler bar beyond the link, a large linear movement can marisessomeofthekeyfunctionsandfeaturesfour- be obtained. Figure 1(c) illustrates how the location bar linkages. As is common practice, one link is shown and orientation of a linear actuator can be fine-tuned as grounded, whilst the opposite link is referred to by creating an extension bar to the input link. as the coupler link. There is normally one input link Figure 1(d) shows an inverted four-bar arrange- and one output link. In general, the input and output ment which creates a compact hinge with a moving links can be any of the three links which are not the centre of rotation. Figure 1(e) shows that when the grounded link. grounded bar is extended, it can be grounded behind 2 Bioinspir. Biomim. 16 (2021) 041001 Topical Rev iew Figure 3. The four-bar pantograph mechanism in the avian wing joint [21]. (a) Bones in the avian wing. (b) Schematic of the four-bar linkage. Figure 4. The wing joint of flies (Dipteran). (a) Cross section of thorax [26]. (b) Schematic of four-bar linkage. one of the pivot points, thus enabling the mechanism sistent format to aid comparison. In particular, the to be located away from a grounding area. Figure 1(f) input and output motions and forces are specified as shows that when the coupler link is nearly in line with these are often incomplete in the original sources. An the output link (an over-centre position) the mech- attempt has been made to draw the linkage mecha- anism can be made to be self-locking. The configu- nisms approximately to scale. ration in figure 1(f) is also bi-stable because it can Unless otherwise stated, the mechanisms are develop in one of two ways (inverted or noninverted). assumed to be planar with revolute joints and rigid It will be shown that all the design features illus- links. However, virtually all biological linkage mech- trated in figure 1 are found in animal joints. The anisms have a degree of out-of-plane movement. In descriptions of the first four linkage mechanisms are addition, biological links sometimes undergo signifi- based on the author’s own research whilst the remain- cant changes in length, especially when they are com- ing six are based on the literature. posed of soft tissue such as ligaments. For example, All the linkage mechanisms have been completely it has been found that the coupler link in the large- redrawn from original sources and put into a con- mouth bass (see section 3.2) stretches by around 5% 3 Bioinspir. Biomim. 16 (2021) 041001 Topical Rev iew Figure 5. Schematics of the linkage mechanisms in wrasse jaws. (a) Sling-jaw wrasse [28]. (b) Cheek-lined wrasse [27]. (c) Parrotfish [6]. at peak gape (mouth opening) [7]. The linkage mech- ‘hinges’ are formed by the flexibility of the cruciate anisms of snakes have also been found to be highly ligaments where they join the bones. The cruciate lig- flexible [3]. aments are located between the two condyles of the femur bone which enables the linkage mechanism to operate in parallel with the cam mechanism. The cru- 2. Limb and wing joints ciate ligaments are kept taut in tension and cannot take compression loads. 2.1. Mammalian knee joint The cam mechanism consists of a cam (femur) The mammalian knee joint can be modelled approxi- and follower (tibia) and has a mixture of rolling and mately by a planar inverted four-bar mechanism and sliding during hinge movement [18]. The moving cam with a moving centre of rotation [6]. Figure 2 centre of rotation of the four-bar mechanism must be shows a schematic of the linkage mechanism in the compatible with the cam motion during the required human knee joint [17]. The crossed links of the mech- range of motion, otherwise the joint will not move anism are formed by the cruciate ligaments (anterior freely. and posterior) whilst the remaining two bars are effec- The main function of the knee joint is to form a tively formed by the bones (femur and tibia).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Stable Structural Color Patterns Displayed on Transparent Insect Wings
    Stable structural color patterns displayed on transparent insect wings Ekaterina Shevtsovaa,1, Christer Hanssona,b,1, Daniel H. Janzenc,1, and Jostein Kjærandsend,1 aDepartment of Biology, Lund University, Sölvegatan 35, SE-22362 Lund, Sweden; bScientific Associate of the Entomology Department, Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom; cDepartment of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6018; and dDepartment of Biology, Museum of Zoology, Lund University, Helgonavägen 3, SE-22362 Lund, Sweden Contributed by Daniel H. Janzen, November 24, 2010 (sent for review October 5, 2010) Color patterns play central roles in the behavior of insects, and are and F). In laboratory conditions most wings are studied against a important traits for taxonomic studies. Here we report striking and white background (Fig. 1 G, H, and J), or the wings are embedded stable structural color patterns—wing interference patterns (WIPs) in a medium with a refractive index close to that of chitin (e.g., —in the transparent wings of small Hymenoptera and Diptera, ref. 19). In both cases the color reflections will be faint or in- patterns that have been largely overlooked by biologists. These ex- visible. tremely thin wings reflect vivid color patterns caused by thin film Insects are an exceedingly diverse and ancient group and interference. The visibility of these patterns is affected by the way their signal-receiver architecture of thin membranous wings the insects display their wings against various backgrounds with and color vision was apparently in place before their huge radia- different light properties. The specific color sequence displayed tion (20–22). The evolution of functional wings (Pterygota) that lacks pure red and matches the color vision of most insects, strongly can be freely operated in multidirections (Neoptera), coupled suggesting that the biological significance of WIPs lies in visual with small body size, has long been viewed as associated with their signaling.
    [Show full text]
  • Consequences of Evolutionary Transitions in Changing Photic Environments
    bs_bs_banner Austral Entomology (2017) 56,23–46 Review Consequences of evolutionary transitions in changing photic environments Simon M Tierney,1* Markus Friedrich,2,3 William F Humphreys,1,4,5 Therésa M Jones,6 Eric J Warrant7 and William T Wcislo8 1School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia. 2Department of Biological Sciences, Wayne State University, 5047 Gullen Mall, Detroit, MI 48202, USA. 3Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Wayne State University, School of Medicine, 540 East Canfield Avenue, Detroit, MI 48201, USA. 4Terrestrial Zoology, Western Australian Museum, Locked Bag 49, Welshpool DC, WA 6986, Australia. 5School of Animal Biology, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA 6907, Australia. 6Department of Zoology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic. 3010, Australia. 7Department of Biology, Lund University, Sölvegatan 35, S-22362 Lund, Sweden. 8Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, PO Box 0843-03092, Balboa, Ancón, Republic of Panamá. Abstract Light represents one of the most reliable environmental cues in the biological world. In this review we focus on the evolutionary consequences to changes in organismal photic environments, with a specific focus on the class Insecta. Particular emphasis is placed on transitional forms that can be used to track the evolution from (1) diurnal to nocturnal (dim-light) or (2) surface to subterranean (aphotic) environments, as well as (3) the ecological encroachment of anthropomorphic light on nocturnal habitats (artificial light at night). We explore the influence of the light environment in an integrated manner, highlighting the connections between phenotypic adaptations (behaviour, morphology, neurology and endocrinology), molecular genetics and their combined influence on organismal fitness.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of a Miniature Mechanism for Producing Insect Wing Motion
    The development of a miniature mechanism for producing insect wing motion S. C. Burgess, K. Alemzadeh & L. Zhang Department of Mechanical Engineering, Bristol University, Bristol, UK Abstract Insects are capable of very agile flight on a small scale. If a man-made machine can be built that can fly like an insect, it would have important industrial, civil and military applications. Insects have complex wing motions including non- planar wing strokes and stroke reversal. This paper presents the design of a novel mechanism which can produce insect type wing motion. The mechanism is very light and compact and has potential for use in micro air vehicles. A prototype has been built and some preliminary tests have been carried out to characterize the mechanism performance. Keywords: insect flight, wing motion, novel mechanisms, wing reversal, lift. 1 Introduction The ability for controlled flight has existed in at least four classes of creature: (1) birds; (2) mammals (bats); (3) reptiles (pterosaurs); and (4) insects. Pterosaurs are believed to have been the largest fliers with wingspans up to 12m. It is thought that pterosaurs were capable of flapping flight because fossil records show a similar type of shoulder joint to that found in birds. Birds currently have a large range of size from the large albatross with a wingspan of up to 3.5m, to the tiny bumble hummingbird which has a span of only 8cm. Most birds can perform flapping flight but not true hovering flight. However, hummingbirds have a flexible shoulder joint which enables them to hover in windless conditions. Bats have a relatively small range of size.
    [Show full text]
  • Quick Estimates of Flight Fitness in Hovering Animals, Including Novel Mechanisms for Lift Production
    7. Exp. Biol. (1973). 59. 169-230 l6g With 23 text-figures Printed in Great Britain QUICK ESTIMATES OF FLIGHT FITNESS IN HOVERING ANIMALS, INCLUDING NOVEL MECHANISMS FOR LIFT PRODUCTION BY TORKEL WEIS-FOGH Department of Zoology, Cambridge CBz ^EJ, England (Received 11 January 1973) INTRODUCTION In a recent paper I have analysed the aerodynamics and energetics of hovering hummingbirds and DrosophUa and have found that, in spite of non-steady periods, the main flight performance of these types is consistent with steady-state aerodynamics (Weis-Fogh, 1972). The same may or may not apply to other flapping animals which practise hovering or slow forward flight at similar Reynolds numbers (Re), ioa to io*. As discussed in that paper, there are of course non-steady flow situations at the start and stop of each half-stroke of the wings. Moreover, it does not follow that all hovering animals make use mainly of steady-state principles. It is therefore desirable to obtain as simple and as easily analytical expressions as possible which should make it feasible to estimate the forces on the wings and the work and power produced. In this way one may make use of the large number of observations on freely flying animals to be found in the scattered literature. It may then be possible to identify the deviating groups and to approach the problems in a new way. This is the main purpose of the present studies, which both include new material and provide novel solutions. Major emphasis must be placed on simplicity. This involves approximations since the true flight system is so complicated as to be unmanageable.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring the Origin of Insect Wings from an Evo-Devo Perspective
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Exploring the origin of insect wings from an evo-devo perspective Courtney M Clark-Hachtel and Yoshinori Tomoyasu Although insect wings are often used as an example of once (i.e. are monophyletic) sometime during the Upper morphological novelty, the origin of insect wings remains a Devonian or Lower Carboniferous (370-330 MYA) [3,5,9]. mystery and is regarded as a major conundrum in biology. Over By the early Permian (300 MYA), winged insects had a century of debates and observations have culminated in two diversified into at least 10 orders [4]. Therefore, there is prominent hypotheses on the origin of insect wings: the tergal quite a large gap in the fossil record between apterygote hypothesis and the pleural hypothesis. However, despite and diverged pterygote lineages, which has resulted in a accumulating efforts to unveil the origin of insect wings, neither long-running debate over where insect wings have come hypothesis has been able to surpass the other. Recent from and how they have evolved. investigations using the evolutionary developmental biology (evo-devo) approach have started shedding new light on this Two proposed wing origins century-long debate. Here, we review these evo-devo studies The insect wing origin debate can be broken into two and discuss how their findings may support a dual origin of main groups of thought; wings evolved from the tergum of insect wings, which could unify the two major hypotheses. ancestral insects or wings evolved from pleuron-associat- Address ed structures (Figure 1. See Box 1 for insect anatomy) Miami University, Pearson Hall, 700E High Street, Oxford, OH 45056, [10 ].
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Vortices in Animal Locomotion in Fluids
    Applied and Computational Mechanics 8 (2014) 147–156 The role of vortices in animal locomotion in fluids R. Dvorˇak´ a,∗ a Institute of Thermomechanics v.v.i., Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Dolejˇskova 1402/5, 182 00 Prague, Czech Republic Received 26 March 2014; received in revised form 10 December 2014 Abstract The aim of this paper is to show the significance of vortices in animal locomotion in fluids on two deliberately chosen examples. The first example concerns lift generation by bird and insect wings, the second example briefly mentiones swimming and walking on water. In all the examples, the vortices generated by the moving animal impart the necessary momentum to the surrounding fluid, the reaction to which is the force moving or lifting the animal. c 2014 University of West Bohemia. All rights reserved. Keywords: animal locomotion, bird flight, flapping wings, insect flight, swimming, walking on water, vortices in animal propulsion 1. Introduction The topic is far too diverse to cover all aspects of animal locomotion both in (or on) water and air. All animals in water and air have inhabitated this planet for 300 million years (fishes and insects, twice as long as birds who are here about 150 million years), and they have had well enough time to develop their skill of swimming and flying. From the whole number of existing animal species almost 80 % have the capability of flying, out of which almost 99 % are insects (about 106 species). It is only less than half a century when people have begun to uncover the mechanism of their — often uncomprehensible — way of locomotion.
    [Show full text]
  • Structure & Materials of the Insect Wing
    Structure & Materials of the Insect Wing Article by Samantha Chalut Background To this day, Evolution the true origins of insect flight remains obscure, as the earliest he earliest insects had four winged insects show evidence of Twings, independently being fully adept at flight. functioning forewings and hindwings. The well-known insects, n insect’s wings are outgrowths damselflies and dragonflies, have Aof the exoskeleton that enable kept this design. Since then, insect it to fly; this includes two pairs of wing designs vary where either the wings known as the forewing and forewing or hindwing are hindwing (although a select few specialized for force production, insects lack hindwings). The while many other insects are current designs of an insect wings functionally 2 winged through have evolved over hundreds of attaching the smaller hindwings millions of years to produce many to the forewings. variations, each with it’s own design tradeoffs. These tradeoffs may include specializations in the flight performance aspects such as efficiency, versatility, maneuverability, or stability. Structure he structure and design of an insect Twing is essential, as it must endure functionally over the insect’s lifespan. They must be capable of enduring collisions or tearing without failure. To achieve this insect wings can deform readily, even reversibly, through its overall structure. In many cases aerodynamic efficiency is improved through the coupling of the forewing and hindwing. This is achieved in a few different ways. Most commonly, the wings are coupled through a row of small hooks on the forward margin of the hindwing, locking onto the forewing. Another form of coupling is seen where Grasshopper forewing vein celled intersections the jugal lobe of the forewing covers a portion of the hindwing, or even where they broadly overlap.
    [Show full text]
  • Phasmid Studies Volume 15 Issues 1&2
    Printed ISSN 0966-0011 Online ISSN 1750-3329 PHASMID STUDIES Volume 15, numbers 1 & 2. March 2007. Editor: Dr. P.E. Bragg. Produced by the Phasmid Study Group The Phasmid Study Group. The Phasmid Study Group (PSG) was formed in 1980 to foster the study of phasmids. The group currently has several hundred members worldwide. The membership ranges from young children to professional entomologists. The PSG holds regular meetings and presents displays at all the major entomological exhibitions in the U.K. The PSG places emphasis on study by rearing and captive breeding and has a panel of breeders who distribute livestock to other members. The PSG produces two publications which are issued free to members. The Phasmid Study Group Newsletter is issued quarterly and contains news items, livestock information, details of exhibitions and meetings, and a variety of short articles on all aspects of phasmids. Phasmid Studies is issued on-line and in print. Typically it is produced biannually, in March and September, but this is currently under review. It contains longer articles on all aspects of phasmids, with an emphasis on natural history, captive breeding, taxonomy, and behavioural studies. Each issue contains abstracts of papers from other recent publications. Details of membership may be obtained from the Treasurer and Membership Secretary, Paul Brock, "Papillon", 40 Thorndike Road, Slough, Berks, SL2 1SR, U.K. Annual subscription rates are currently: U.K. £12.00; Europe £14.00; Worldwide £15.00. Phasma. This is a Dutch-Belgian group with similar aims to the Phasmid Study Group. It produces a quarterly newsletter, Phasma, which is published in Dutch.
    [Show full text]
  • What Serial Homologs Can Tell Us About the Origin
    F1000Research 2017, 6(F1000 Faculty Rev):268 Last updated: 17 JUL 2019 REVIEW What serial homologs can tell us about the origin of insect wings [version 1; peer review: 2 approved] Yoshinori Tomoyasu 1*, Takahiro Ohde2,3*, Courtney Clark-Hachtel1* 1Department of Biology, Miami University, Pearson Hall, 700E High Street, Oxford, OH 45056, USA 2Division of Evolutionary Developmental Biology, National Institute for Basic Biology, 38 Nishigonaka Myodaiji, Okazaki 444-8585, Japan 3Department of Basic Biology, School of Life Science, SOKENDAI (The Graduate University for Advanced Studies), 38 Nishigonaka Myodaiji, Okazaki 444-8585, Japan * Equal contributors First published: 14 Mar 2017, 6(F1000 Faculty Rev):268 ( Open Peer Review v1 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.10285.1) Latest published: 14 Mar 2017, 6(F1000 Faculty Rev):268 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.10285.1) Reviewer Status Abstract Invited Reviewers Although the insect wing is a textbook example of morphological novelty, 1 2 the origin of insect wings remains a mystery and is regarded as a chief conundrum in biology. Centuries of debates have culminated into two version 1 prominent hypotheses: the tergal origin hypothesis and the pleural origin published hypothesis. However, between these two hypotheses, there is little 14 Mar 2017 consensus in regard to the origin tissue of the wing as well as the evolutionary route from the origin tissue to the functional flight device. Recent evolutionary developmental (evo-devo) studies have shed new light F1000 Faculty Reviews are written by members of on the origin of insect wings. A key concept in these studies is “serial the prestigious F1000 Faculty.
    [Show full text]
  • Size, Shape and Structure of Insect Wings
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/478768; this version posted November 26, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Size, shape and structure of insect wings Mary K. Salcedo,1, a) Jordan Hoffmann,2, a) Seth Donoughe,3 and L. Mahadevan1, 2, b) 1)Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 2)School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 3)Department of Molecular Genetics and Cell Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL The size, shape and structure of insect wings are intimately linked to their ability to fly. However, there are few systematic studies of the variability of the natural patterns in wing morphology across insects. We assemble a comprehensive dataset of insect wings and analyze their morphology using topological and geometric notions in terms of i) wing size and contour shape, ii) vein geometry and topology, and iii) shape and distribution of wing membrane domains. These morphospaces are a first-step in defining the diversity of wing patterns across insect orders and set the stage for investigating their functional consequences. a)Equal contribution b)Electronic mail: [email protected] 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/478768; this version posted November 26, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. INTRODUCTION Of all the multicellular species on our planet, insects are the most speciose, with more than one million species1.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental and Biotic Controls on the Evolutionary History of Insect
    Environmental and biotic controls on the evolutionary SEE COMMENTARY history of insect body size Matthew E. Clapham1 and Jered A. Karr Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 Edited by James H. Brown, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, and approved April 27, 2012 (received for review March 7, 2012) Giant insects, with wingspans as large as 70 cm, ruled the Car- competitive or predatory interactions with flying vertebrates boniferous and Permian skies. Gigantism has been linked to (birds, bats, and pterosaurs), may have contributed to or even hyperoxic conditions because oxygen concentration is a key been the dominant control on evolutionary size trends (18, 19). physiological control on body size, particularly in groups like The rich fossil history of insects (21) contains the only record of flying insects that have high metabolic oxygen demands. Here evolutionary body-size trends in response to changing atmospheric we show, using a dataset of more than 10,500 fossil insect wing pO2 (22), temperature, and evolution of flying predators and lengths, that size tracked atmospheric oxygen concentrations only competitors (23). Our quantitative analysis of evolutionary size for the first 150 Myr of insect evolution. The data are best ex- trends from more than 10,500 measured fossil insect specimens plained by a model relating maximum size to atmospheric en- confirms the importance of atmospheric pO2 in enabling the evo- vironmental oxygen concentration (pO2) until the end of the lution of large body size, but suggests that the pO2-size relationship Jurassic, and then at constant sizes, independent of oxygen fluc- was superseded by biological factors following the evolution and tuations, during the Cretaceous and, at a smaller size, the Ceno- aerial specialization of flying vertebrates, particularly birds.
    [Show full text]
  • Animal Abstracts 44
    ABSTRACT BOOK SEB BRIGHTON 2016 4–7 July, 2016 BRIGHTON CENTRE,UK SEBIOLOGY.ORG #SEBAMM SUN, SEA & SCIENCE SOCIETY FOR EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY ABSTRACTS ANIMAL BIOLOGY 2 ANNUAL MAIN MEETING BRIGHTON 2016 ANIMAL ABSTRACTS 44 A1 DEVELOPMENTAL BIOMECHANICS OF MOTOR SKILLS ORGANISED BY:PROF JOHAN VAN LEEUWEN (WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY, NETHERLANDS) & PROF PETER AERTS (UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP, BELGIUM) i n loca l be nd i ng powe r a s t he fi sh g rows. We developed a combi ned A1.1 ACQUIRED VERSUS INNATE experimental and computational approach for reconstructing time- PREY CAPTURING SKILLS IN SUPER- resolved bending moment distributions from high-speed videos of f ree -sw i m m i ng la r vae (2-12 dpf ). Fi rst, we recon st r uc t t he t h ree - PRECOCIAL LIVE-BEARING FISH dimensional position, orientation and body curvature from these i mages. We feed t hese recon st r uc t ion s i nto a computat iona l flu id- TUESDAY 5 JULY, 2016 13:45 dynamics solver in order to calculate the flow field and the fluid forces a long t he fi sh’s body. Fi na l ly, we combi ne t he mot ion of t he long it ud i na l body a x i s a nd t he e x te r na l flu id forces a s i nput for a n MARTIN LANKHEET (WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY, NETHERLANDS) opt i m i zat ion procedu re to ca lc u late t he best fit t i ng t i me - depe nde nt Live-bearing fish start hunting for mobile prey within hours after bending moment distribution.
    [Show full text]