DOCSLIB.ORG

A Systematic Review of Reviews Identifying UK Validated Dietary Assessment Tools for Inclusion on an Interactive Guided Website for Researchers

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Systematic Review of Reviews Identifying UK Validated Dietary Assessment Tools for Inclusion on an Interactive Guided Website for Researchers This is a repository copy of A systematic review of reviews identifying UK validated dietary assessment tools for inclusion on an interactive guided website for researchers: www.nutritools.org. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/159658/ Version: Published Version Article: Hooson (Jzh), J., Hutchinson (Jyh), J., Warthon-Medina, M. et al. (21 more authors) (2020) A systematic review of reviews identifying UK validated dietary assessment tools for inclusion on an interactive guided website for researchers: www.nutritools.org. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 60 (8). pp. 1265-1289. ISSN 1040-8398 https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2019.1566207 Reuse This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence. This licence allows you to distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon the work, even commercially, as long as you credit the authors for the original work. More information and the full terms of the licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition ISSN: 1040-8398 (Print) 1549-7852 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/bfsn20 A systematic review of reviews identifying UK validated dietary assessment tools for inclusion on an interactive guided website for researchers: www.nutritools.org Jozef Hooson (Jzh), Jayne Hutchinson (Jyh), Marisol Warthon-Medina, Neil Hancock, Katharine Greathead, Bethany Knowles, Elisa Vargas-Garcia, Lauren E. Gibson, Linda A. Bush, Barrie Margetts, Sian Robinson, Andy Ness, Nisreen A. Alwan, Petra A. Wark, Mark Roe, Paul Finglas, Toni Steer, Polly Page, Laura Johnson, Katharine Roberts, Birdem Amoutzopoulos, Victoria J. Burley, Darren C. Greenwood & Janet E. Cadeon behalf of the DIET@NET consortium To cite this article: Jozef Hooson (Jzh), Jayne Hutchinson (Jyh), Marisol Warthon-Medina, Neil Hancock, Katharine Greathead, Bethany Knowles, Elisa Vargas-Garcia, Lauren E. Gibson, Linda A. Bush, Barrie Margetts, Sian Robinson, Andy Ness, Nisreen A. Alwan, Petra A. Wark, Mark Roe, Paul Finglas, Toni Steer, Polly Page, Laura Johnson, Katharine Roberts, Birdem Amoutzopoulos, Victoria J. Burley, Darren C. Greenwood & Janet E. Cadeon behalf of the DIET@NET consortium (2020) A systematic review of reviews identifying UK validated dietary assessment tools for inclusion on an interactive guided website for researchers: www.nutritools.org, Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 60:8, 1265-1289, DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2019.1566207 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2019.1566207 © 2019 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC View supplementary material Published online: 18 Mar 2019. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 3290 View related articles View Crossmark data Citing articles: 1 View citing articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=bfsn20 CRITICAL REVIEWS IN FOOD SCIENCE AND NUTRITION 2020, VOL. 60, NO. 8, 1265–1289 https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2019.1566207 REVIEW A systematic review of reviews identifying UK validated dietary assessment tools for inclusion on an interactive guided website for researchers: www.nutritools.org Jozef Hooson (JZH)a, Jayne Hutchinson (JYH)a , Marisol Warthon-Medinaa,b , Neil Hancocka, Katharine Greatheada, Bethany Knowlesa, Elisa Vargas-Garciaa , Lauren E. Gibsona, Linda A. Busha, Barrie Margettsc, Sian Robinsond,e, Andy Nessf, Nisreen A. Alwanf,g, Petra A. Warkh,i, Mark Roeb,j, Paul Finglasb, Toni Steerk, Polly Pagek, Laura Johnsonl, Katharine Robertsm,n, Birdem Amoutzopoulosk, Victoria J. Burleya, Darren C. Greenwoodo, and Janet E. Cadea ; on behalf of the DIET@NET consortium aNutritional Epidemiology Group, School of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; bFood Databanks National Capability, Quadram Institute Bioscience, Norwich, UK; cFaculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK; dMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK; eNIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton & University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK; fNIHR Biomedical Research Unit in Nutrition, Diet and Lifestyle, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol, Bristol, UK; gAcademic Unit of Primary Care and Population Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK; hCentre for Innovative Research Across the Life Course (CIRAL), Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Coventry University, Coventry, UK; iGlobal eHealth Unit, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK; jEuroFIR AISBL, Brussels, Belgium; kMRC Elsie Widdowson Laboratory, Cambridge, UK; lCentre for Exercise, Nutrition and Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK; mPublic Health Section, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK; nPublic Health England, London, UK; oFaculty of Medicine and Health Division of Biostatistics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK ABSTRACT KEYWORDS Background: Health researchers may struggle to choose suitable validated dietary assessment Validation studies; Diet tools (DATs) for their target population. The aim of this review was to identify and collate informa- records; Systematic Review; tion on validated UK DATs and validation studies for inclusion on a website to support researchers Study Characteristics; Dietary Assessment; Limits to choose appropriate DATs. of Agreement Design: A systematic review of reviews of DATs was undertaken. DATs validated in UK populations were extracted from the studies identified. A searchable website was designed to display these data. Additionally, mean differences and limits of agreement between test and comparison meth- ods were summarized by a method, weighting by sample size. Results: Over 900 validation results covering 5 life stages, 18 nutrients, 6 dietary assessment meth- ods, and 9 validation method types were extracted from 63 validated DATs which were identified from 68 reviews. These were incorporated into www.nutritools.org. Limits of agreement were determined for about half of validations. Thirty four DATs were FFQs. Only 17 DATs were validated against biomarkers, and only 19 DATs were validated in infant/children/adolescents. Conclusions: The interactive www.nutritools.org website holds extensive validation data identified from this review and can be used to guide researchers to critically compare and choose a suitable DAT for their research question, leading to improvement of nutritional epidemiology research. Introduction measurement of dietary intake, both at an individual and population level, is challenging due to measurement difficul- Diets high in energy dense and nutrient-poor foods have ties, low participation rates, and degree of compliance, with been linked to an increased risk of chronic diseases such as no single method being identified as the best approach for obesity, cardiovascular disease, and particular cancers (Rollo population studies (Shim, Oh, and Kim 2014). et al. 2016). Measuring dietary intake accurately is, therefore, Dietary measurement has relied on self-reported dietary essential in establishing relationships between food con- assessment tools (DATs) such as food frequency question- sumption patterns and non-communicable diseases (Serra- naires (FFQs), 24-hour recalls, and weighed/estimated food Majem et al. 2009); or when evaluating the effectiveness of diaries (WFD, EFD) (Johnson 2002; Long et al. 2010). public health policies and interventions (Mouratidou et al. However, these methods are prone to selective 2012; Øverby, Serra-Majem, and Andersen 2009). Accurate CONTACT Janet E. Cade [email protected] Nutritional Epidemiology Group, School of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. Supplemental data for this article can be accessed here. ß 2019 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 1266 J. HOOSON (JZH) ET AL. Table 1. Inclusion and exclusion criteria applied to the reviews and DATs. Reviews DATs Inclusion criteria Exclusion criteria Inclusion criteria Exclusion criteria Reviews that validated a DAT Reviews that exclusively eval- Tools validated in a UK population DATs measuring eating disor- against a biomarker or another uated tools assessing inadequacy Be able to measure dietary intake ders, food preferences, feeding self-reported tool against energy, of diets in terms of malnutrition Validation results can be entered practices or inadequacy of diets macro or micro nutrients or Commentaries, editorials or on the nutritools website Lifestyle based tools (e.g. diet food groups other opinion articles plus physical activity) Reviews published since 1st DATS measuring the purchasing January 2000
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Guidance for Applicants
    Guidance for applicants The British Academy, Royal Academy of Engineering and A full list of the disciplines covered by the Academies can the Royal Society are three of five Designated Competent be found in the ‘Guidance on Policy for UK visas under Tier Bodies (DCBs) appointed by the Home Office to assess 1 (Exceptional Talent)’ document available on the Home applications for the Research and Innovation Talent Visa Office website. under the Home Office Tier 1 (Exceptional Talent) Visa route. Holders of a Research and Innovation Talent Visa that were As DCBs, the Academies are responsible for considering endorsed through Exceptional Talent are eligible to apply whether an individual who makes an application for settlement (Indefinite Leave to Remain) after three years. is demonstrably ‘exceptionally talented’ or has Holders endorsed through Exceptional Promise are eligible ‘exceptional promise’. after five years. Tier 1 (Exceptional Talent) is subject to a limit of 2,000 visas per year (beginning on 6 April one year and ending on 5 April the following year). The Academies assess applications in the following areas and are allocated a minumum number of endorsements by the Home Office from the total annual pool. • The British Academy – for humanities and social sciences (150 endorsements); • The Royal Society – for natural sciences and medical science research (250 endorsements); • The Royal Academy of Engineering – for engineering (150 endorsements). TIER 1 APPLICATION GUIDANCE 1 Overview of the application process The application for a Research & Innovation Talent visa Should the decision be upheld then the process ends here. (Tier 1 Exceptional Talent) is in two stages: You can still apply via another visa route or re-apply to this route with revised supporting evidence.
    [Show full text]
  • Quadram Institute Newsletter
    Autumn 2019 Welcome to the newsle�er of the Quadram Ins�tute. This issue highlights recent research breakthroughs at the We con�nue to build our team and are pleased to welcome Quadram Ins�tute (QI) that could have posi�ve impacts on Professor Cynthia Whitchurch to the QI. Cynthia is se�ng public health. Working with clinicians our researchers have up a research group inves�ga�ng bacterial lifestyles, and shown how the latest sequencing technologies can aid in how these make them more infec�ous or resistant to diagnos�cs and surveillance. Coupling these techniques an�microbials. Cynthia joins us from the ithree ins�tute at with ‘Big Data’ analy�cal approaches will be vital to the University of Technology Sydney. Her research led to addressing 21st century popula�on health challenges, and the discovery that extracellular DNA is required for biofilm the QI aims to be a leader in this area. development. Big Data in the NHS was the topic of a roundtable We con�nue to welcome visitors to our new building to discussion I a�ended with Patricia Hart at the policy share our vision to understand how food and microbes development think tank Reform. This roundtable was interact to promote health and prevent disease. In June, we sponsored by QI and explored how universi�es and industry had the honour of hos�ng His Excellency Simon Smits, can work with government to realise poten�al applica�ons Ambassador of the Netherlands to the UK. The Ambassador of Big Data. The event was chaired by Baroness Blackwood, visited the Norwich Research Park as part of an Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department of interna�onal trade delega�on to East Anglia to learn about Health and Social Care (DHSC) and included senior the region’s world-leading life sciences research and trade policy-makers, public service prac��oners, academics and opportuni�es.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Evaluation Report the Economic Impact of Creating A
    Economic Evaluation Report The economic impact of creating a congestion free, energy independent city Prepared for Exeter City Futures by Vivid Economics 1 Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................ 5 1 Urban Development Framework ........................................................... 7 2 Exeter Area Baseline ............................................................................ 12 3 Potential Impact of Energy Independence .......................................... 27 4 Potential Impact of Transport Innovation ........................................... 44 5 Opportunities for export-oriented businesses .................................... 58 6 Conclusion............................................................................................. 62 Bibliography .......................................................................................................... 64 Appendix 1 – Assumptions and Sources in the Energy Efficiency Analysis .......... 66 Appendix 2 – Defining Congestion ....................................................................... 71 Appendix 3 – Transportation Case Studies .......................................................... 73 Appendix 4 – Sensitivity Analysis ......................................................................... 77 Appendix 5 - Innovation Initiatives and Programmes .......................................... 78 Appendix 6 – Complexity Analysis .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • BBSRC Business Summer 2018 Introduction
    Summer 2018 BusinessBBSRC is part of UK Research and Innovation INSIDE The quest for Frontier Bioscience AI and machine learning Innovator of the Year 2018 Omega-3 Women in science and innovation Camelina: the quest to find a sustainable source of fish oils. Page 10 About BBSRC-UKRI BBSRC is part of UK Our aim is to further scientific knowledge to meet major challenges, including food to promote economic growth, wealth and security, green energy and healthier, Research and Innovation job creation, and to improve quality of life longer lives. Our investments underpin and invests in world-class in the UK and beyond. important UK economic sectors, such as farming, food, industrial biotechnology bioscience research and Funded by Government, BBSRC invested and pharmaceuticals. training on behalf of the £498M in world-class bioscience in UK public. 2016-2017. We support research and Further details about BBSRC, our training in universities and strategically science and our impact can be found funded institutes. BBSRC research and at www.bbsrc.ukri.org the people we fund are helping society Strategically funded institutes Babraham Institute The Pirbright Institute Institute for Biological, The Quadram Institute www.babraham.ac.uk www.pirbright.ac.uk Environmental and Rural Studies www.quadram.ac.uk (Aberystwyth University) www.aber.ac.uk/en/ibers John Innes Centre Roslin Institute Rothamsted Research Earlham Institute www.jic.ac.uk (University of Edinburgh) www.rothamsted.ac.uk www.earlham.ac.uk Front cover: Douglas Tocher, Monica Betancor and Jonathan Napier, working on the quest for www.roslin.ac.uk Omega-3. See page 10.
    [Show full text]
  • KTN Microbiome Strategic Roadmap
    KTN Microbiome Innovation Network’s Strategic Roadmap Foreword Microbiome Strategic Roadmap This report reviews the landscape of microbiome science and innovation within the UK. In line with the “one health” approach, it spans human, animal and plant sectors with key recommendations on how to advance science translation and business creation. 01 KTN Microbiome Innovation Network’s Strategic Roadmap Contents Foreword 03 Summary and Recommended Precompetitive Priority Actions 04 Section 1: Intestinal Microbiome Transfer 13 Section 2: Live Biotherapeutic Products and Other Therapeutic Modalities 15 Section 3: Personal Care and Hygiene 22 Section 4: Nutrition and Wellbeing 26 Section 5: Animal Health and Nutrition 30 Section 6: AgriFood & Nutrition – Crop & Soil Health 34 Section 7: Regulatory 40 Section 8: Manufacturing 45 Section 9: Biobanking 47 Section 10: Enabling Technologies 49 Section 11: Diagnostics 53 Section 12: Intellectual Property 56 Please note: Regarding the Forward and Summary, in our capacity as editors of this report, we have endeavored to capture accurately the key elements and recommendations of the individual chapters that follow. However, the authors of the main chapters are not responsible for the content of the Foreword and Summary sections including any possible errors. 02 KTN Microbiome Innovation Network’s Strategic Roadmap Foreword The KTN Microbiome Innovation Network or “KTN MIN” (formerly known as a Special Interest Group), was launched at the end of 2019 with the following vision, mission and goals: VISION:
    [Show full text]
  • An Integrated Analysis of Contact Tracing and Genomics to Assess The
    medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.15.21253590; this version posted March 17, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license . 1 An integrated analysis of contact tracing and genomics to assess the efficacy of travel 2 restrictions on SARS-CoV-2 introduction and transmission in England from June to 3 September, 2020 4 5 *Dinesh Aggarwal1,2,3,4, Andrew J. Page5,^, Ulf Schaefer2,^, George M. Savva5, Richard 6 Myers2, Erik Volz6, Nicholas Ellaby2, Steven Platt2, Natalie Groves2, Eileen Gallaghar2, 7 Niamh M. Tumelty7, Thanh Le Viet5, Gareth J. Hughes8, Cong Chen2, Charlie Turner2, 8 Sophie Logan9, Abbie Harrison2, The COVID-19 Genomics UK (COG-UK) Consortium10,#, 9 Sharon J. Peacock1,2,3,4, Meera Chand2^^, *Ewan M. Harrison1,2,4,11^^ 10 11 Affiliations 12 1. University of Cambridge, Department of Medicine, Cambridge, UK. 13 2. Public Health England, 61 Colindale Ave, London, NW9 5EQ, UK. 14 3. Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK. 15 4. Wellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK. 16 5. Quadram Institute bioscience, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7UQ, UK. 17 • 6. Imperial College London, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London, UK. 18 • 7. University of Cambridge, Cambridge University Libraries, Cambridge, UK 19 • 8. Public Health England National Infections Service, Field Service, Leeds, UK. 20 9. Public Health England, National Infections Service, Field Service, Nottingham, UK.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Human Host- Microbiome Interactions in Health and Disease
    Name: Exploring Human Host- Microbiome Interactions in Health and Disease Wellcome Genome Campus Conference Centre, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK 5-7 December 2018 Scientific Programme Committee: Patricia Hibberd Boston University, USA Colin Hill University College Cork, Ireland Julian Marchesi Imperial College London and Cardiff University, UK Catherine O'Neill University of Manchester, UK Tweet about it: #HMIHD18 @ACSCevents /ACSCevents /c/WellcomeGenomeCampusCoursesandConferences 1 Wellcome Genome Campus Scientific Conferences Team: Rebecca Twells Treasa Creavin Nicole Schatlowski Head of Advanced Courses and Scientific Programme Scientific Programme Scientific Conferences Manager Officer Jemma Beard Lucy Criddle Beccy Jones Conference and Events Conference and Events Conference and Events Organiser Organiser Assistant Laura Hubbard Sarah Offord Zoey Willard Conference and Events Manager Conference & Events Office Conference and Events Administrator Organiser 2 Dear colleague, I would like to offer you a warm welcome to the Wellcome Genome Campus Advanced Courses and Scientific Conferences: Exploring Human Host-Microbiome Interactions in Health and Disease. I hope you will find the talks interesting and stimulating, and find opportunities for networking throughout the schedule. The Wellcome Genome Campus Advanced Courses and Scientific Conferences programme is run on a not-for-profit basis, heavily subsidised by the Wellcome Trust. We organise around 50 events a year on the latest biomedical science for research, diagnostics and therapeutic applications for human and animal health, with world-renowned scientists and clinicians involved as scientific programme committees, speakers and instructors. We offer a range of conferences and laboratory-, IT- and discussion-based courses, which enable the dissemination of knowledge and discussion in an intimate setting. We also organise invitation-only retreats for high-level discussion on emerging science, technologies and strategic direction for select groups and policy makers.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015-16 Convergence Programme for the UK
    2015-16 Convergence Programme for the United Kingdom: submitted in line with the Stability and Growth pact March 2016 2015-16 Convergence Programme for the United Kingdom: submitted in line with the Stability and Growth pact March 2016 © Crown copyright 2016 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3 or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: [email protected]. Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at www.gov.uk/government/publications Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at [email protected] ISBN 978-1-910835-83-8 PU1923 Contents Page Foreword 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 5 Chapter 2 Overall policy framework and objectives 7 Chapter 3 Excessive deficit procedure 83 Chapter 5 Institutional features of public finances 89 Annex A OBR analysis 93 Annex B Fiscal impact of policy decisions 281 Annex C Supplementary data tables 293 1 Foreword The UK is forecast by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) to be the fastest growing major advanced economy this year, with employment at a record rate of 74.1%. But the challenges are growing. Since the Spending Review and Autumn Statement was published in November 2015, the outlook for the global economy has worsened and global growth has slowed, with the International Monetary Fund (IMF) predicting global growth of 3.4% in 2016, 0.2 percentage points lower than its October forecast.
    [Show full text]
  • Sip-SPRING-2020.Pdf
    SCIENCE IN PARLIAMENT The Journal of the Parliamentary and Scientific Committee – All-Party Parliamentary SPRING 2020 Group sip This is not an official publication of the House of Commons or the House of Lords. It has not been approved by either House or its THE POWER OF Committees. All-Party Groups are informal groups of members of both Houses with a common interest in INNOVATION particular issues. The views expressed in this Journal are those of the Group. This Journal is funded by the members of the Parliamentary and Scientific Committee (All-Party Parliamentary Group). CAN... STEM FOR BRITAIN 2020 SEE SPECIAL FEATURE ON PAGES 24-37 WINNERS ALL! Mathematical Sciences and Physical Sciences (Chemistry and Physics) Exhibitions Florence Gregson (Gold, Chemistry); Gemma Smith (Bronze, Chemistry); Fabienne Bachtiger (Silver, Chemistry); Damian Galante (Bronze, Maths); Maeve Madigan (Bronze, Physics); Luisa Mihaela Paun (Gold, Maths); Graham Bruce (Silver, Physics); Adrien Lefauve (Silver, Maths); Lui Terry (Gold, Physics), joined at the back by Stephen Metcalfe MP, Chairman, STEM for Britain and Dr Stephen Benn, Vice-President, Parliamentary & Scientific Committee, Biomedical and Biological Sciences and Engineering Exhibitions Sarah Houston (Gold, Biosciences and Westminster Medal Winner); Karolina Tuomela (Silver, Biosciences); Benjamin Fletcher (IEEE Communications Society Prize, Engineering); Ted Roberts (Bronze, Biosciences); Benjamin Cerfontaine (Bronze, Engineering); Stephen Metcalfe MP, Chairman, STEM for Britain; Tomas Ysehak Abay (Gold, Engineering); Dr Stephen Benn, Vice-President, Parliamentary & Scientific Committee; Elisa Roccia (Silver, Engineering); Egzona Morina (The Physiological Society Prize, Biosciences); Andres Rivero Bracho (The Dyson Award); and George Firth (The Nutrition Society Prize, Biosciences) aspects of the COVID-19 crisis As ever, STEM for Britain would that we will need to think not have been possible without SCIENCE IN PARLIAMENT through and learn from.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Changes in Immigration Rules
    STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN IMMIGRATION RULES Presented to Parliament pursuant to section 3(2) of the Immigration Act 1971 Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 30 January 2020 (This document is accompanied by an Explanatory Memorandum) HC 56 STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN IMMIGRATION RULES Presented to Parliament pursuant to section 3(2) of the Immigration Act 1971 Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 30 January 2020 (This document is accompanied by an Explanatory Memorandum) HC 56 © Crown copyright 2020 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/version/3 Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. Queries should be directed to the Home Office as per the ‘Contact UKVI’ section on the visas and immigration pages of the GOV.UK website at https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/uk- visas-and-immigration. Specific written queries relating to this Statement of Changes should be directed to [email protected]. Please note that this mailbox is only for Parliamentary use and specific technical queries regarding the drafting of this Statement of Changes. It is not a contact point for general enquiries. Queries to this e-mail address from outside Parliament about other immigration issues, including how these changes affect applications, will not receive a response. A copy of this
    [Show full text]
  • Spring 2018 Issue
    SCIENCE IN PARLIAMENT 8 1 0 2 G N I The Journal of the R Parliamentary and P Scientific Committee sip S Opening in 2018, the Quadr am I nstitut e will f ocus on the impac t of diet and micr ob es on health y ageing , br ing ing clinicians alongside This is not an official publication of the House of scien tists under one r oof , maximising Commons or the House of Lords. It has not been approved the unique w or ld- class bioscienc e by either House or its Committees. All-Party Groups are informal groups of clust er a t the Nor wich members of both Houses with a common Resear ch P ar k. interest in particular issues. The views expressed in this Journal are those of the Group. This Journal is funded by the members of the Parliamentary and Scientific Committee. www.scienceinparliament.org.uk quadr am.ac .uk At t he f orefro nt of en er gy transfor mation £6 0m Ove r In novat e U K in ve stment 40 industrial pa rtners £120 m industrial co -inv estment More t ha n 1,000 7 re searc hers pa rtners Find o ut m ore a t: era .ac.uk Or g et i n t ouch: enqui ries@e ra.a c.uk included in this edition. We also STEM for BRITAIN. Details of the include a summary of the winners can be found on the SCIENCE IN PARLIAMENT meeting we held jointly with the website APPG on Food and Drink www.stemforbritain.org.uk and Manufacturing where we we will be publishing a special discussed the Science of Food STEM for BRITAIN edition of Manufacturing.
    [Show full text]
  • Consultant Information Pack Front Cover
    Chairman Mr John Fry Chief Executive Mark Davies 2 Posts In Luminal Gastroenterology with a subspecialist interest in Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Lower GI Endoscopy Department of Gastroenterology NORFOLK AND NORWICH UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST May 2018 NORFOLK AND NORWICH UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST Consultants in Gastroenterology This advertisement is for 2 new posts within the department of gastroenterology. We are looking to attract applicants who have a subspecialist interest in Inflammatory Bowel disease and lower GI colonoscopy and wish to drive this service forward to deliver high quality and personalized medical care in IBD. These posts have arisen due to the need for expansion of our outpatient IBD service and the growing need to increase our lower GI endoscopic provision in alignment with the opening of our brand new endoscopy unit in the Quadram Institute (see below). A candidate who is unable for personal reasons to undertake the duties of a whole- time post will receive equal consideration. If such a candidate is appointed to this post, content will be modified as appropriate in consultation with the gastroenterology and GI Service director. We welcome all applications irrespective of age, disability, gender, sexual orientation, race or religion. Additionally, people with disabilities will be offered an interview providing they meet the minimum criteria for the post. The Trust operates job sharing and a flexible working programme. The Gastenterology Department The GI department is divided into 3 sub-specialist teams comprising Inflammatory Bowel disease/Luminal GI disorders/Therapeutic Endoscopy, Clinical nutrition and Hepatobiliary medicine and Hepatology. The 2 new successful applicants will join the former team and we welcome full time and part time applicants for these positions.
    [Show full text]