DOCSLIB.ORG

Myth, Religion, Pseudoscience, Establishment Science, and Real Science

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Myth, Religion, Pseudoscience, Establishment Science, and Real Science Myth, Religion, Pseudoscience, Establishment Science, and Real Science (New directions in the future of science) Version 0.7 “The man with a new idea is a crank until the idea succeeds" Samuel Langhorne Clemens (Mark Twain) Title Page (version 0.7) Myth, Religion, Pseudoscience, Establishment Science, and Real Science (New directions in the future of science) Copyright 2016 Benjamin Franklin Jacoby This pseudo-academic book is free educational scientific research literature: you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation, version 3 of the License. This research is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for more details. You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with this dataset. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. This book is distributed under the GNUv3 license because it is felt that the traditional editors and publishers sit as censors of work not only in their position of authority, but also through the choice of who shall “peer-review,” published works. Since it is not the purpose of copyright law to insure profit for publishers and authors, but rather to encourage works for the benefit of civilization, it is believed that current restrictions on “fair use” of such works by others for research and for education of students, flies in the face of the intent of copyright law. For these reasons this pseudo-academic paper has been published under the GNUv3 license. This work is supplied in PDF format that represents the software object code and editable source code in ODF format is supplied by the author under the terms of the GNUv3 license and must be included under those terms in all later versions. The object code may be executed in any manner including but not limited to viewing, printing copies, producing digital files, or saving on any digital storage mechanism. While this work can be distributed in printed form, it is hoped that machine-readable PDF code would be included with the printed version. It is a requirement of the GNU license that both object and source code be made available by one of the methods specified in the license on any distribution including a printed one. Under the GNUv3 license this work may be distributed unchanged, or modified and distributed under those terms. In addition, any portion or all of this work may be included in other GNU works provided this source work is properly credited through common footnote usage or other obvious means. 1 Contents Contents 2 Introduction 4 What Exactly is Science? 5 Facts, Theories, and Explanations 5 Causality 6 The Scientific Method 10 Can a Computer do the Scientific Method? 12 Godel's Theorem – (Many Versions) 15 “Norms” of Science 16 Pseudoscience 18 The Velikovsky Affair 27 Nikola Tesla 32 Corentin Louis Kervran 36 Myths 39 Religion 41 Paradigms 44 The Rosenthal Effect 46 Dissemination and Teaching of Ideas 47 The Grand Material Metaparadigm 49 Forbidden Topics 55 Compiling a List of Forbidden Topics 58 Ultimate Science Forbidden Topic 64 2 The Grand Material Metaparadigm for the 21st century 65 New Viewpoint #1. : The universe is a multidimensional manifold 67 New Viewpoint #2. : What is consciousness? What is life? 69 New Viewpoint #3. :Aether as medium for waves in space. 75 New Viewpoint #4. : Aether as the “Theory of Everything” 77 New Viewpoint #5. : Gravity and Anti-gravity 82 New Viewpoint #6. : Wave-particle duality 84 New Viewpoint #7. : Connectedness of all things 86 New Viewpoint #8. : Newton's laws, electromagnetic karma 88 New Viewpoint #9. : Electromagnetic Recording of history 89 New Viewpoint #10. : Low energy atomic phenomena 90 New Viewpoint #11. : The power of mind 92 CONCLUSIONS 93 Acknowledgments 95 Appendix I A List Of Fallacious Arguments 97 Appendix II “Government” Project Names and Terms 122 Appendix III Some Relevant Government Acronyms 133 3 Myth, Religion, Pseudoscience, Establishment Science, and Real Science (New directions in the future of science) Version 0.7 “The man with a new idea is a crank until the idea succeeds" Samuel Langhorne Clemens (Mark Twain) Introduction Today as we sit looking back at the 20th century, we see science as one of civilization's greatest triumphs. Or more precisely it is science and technology that has produced modern life. And the result is that today even the poorest of the poor live lives that would have been the envy of kings suffering in the squalor and cold of historical times. But by the same token as a knife can be used to cure as well as to kill, so science and technology has developed monitoring and tracking of subjects and slaves that would have been beyond the dreams of the most imaginative despots of history. Privacy is quickly slipping into history as are the interesting ideas of freedom and self-determination that came and now seem to be pretty much slipping back into history. In short, in historical times civilizations ran on human power, which is to say slavery and all that went with it. And of course, since slaves were obtained through the plunder of war, war was one of the things that went with it. The so-called “industrial” revolution changed that system from the use of biological work-power (human and animal) to the direct conversion of energy of various types to do the things that humans and animals used to do. Beginning with the steam engine that directly converted the energy in flammable materials (wood, coal, oil etc.) to mechanical motion, a myriad cornucopia of devices fell out of the 20th century. In particular devices utilizing electricity play a salient role in the development of today's civilization. So much so, that at the beginning of the 21st century one is amazed to find that while there are still humans living in grass huts in the middle of the African jungle pounding corn with a log in an old tree stump, one discovers that those very people living in the grass huts can be called on their cellphones from any place in the world! Of course now wars are fought over control of energy sources rather than for sources of slaves. And the rise of chemical work-power has led to world-wide communications and transportation that has created an amazing uniformity among humans. The rise of India and even more so China as sources of inexpensive goods has flooded the world with the devices and materials of “modern” life. These vast populations had been driven so far down into slavery that when suddenly free to work for one's own benefit rather than in service of the few, they drove themselves far harder than was ever possible as slaves. The result of this production coupled with rapid and global communication is an amazing uniformity creeping over the world. Bales of used T shirts gathered in California are distributed to marketplaces in the third world such that “Berkeley” T shirts are as common there as they are on the Berkeley campus! Native costumes with a few minor exceptions have tended to become nothing more than dress up for holidays and special occasions. Thus, from the viewpoint of day to day humans living their lives, these changes (if they think about them at all) have come from “science”. While this is not strictly true since we will be separating science from technology here, nonetheless, in the popular mind “science” gets the credit. But the problem as we shall see is that in fact too much credit has been given. What has happened is that science has been given so much credit that it has been transformed into a religion and as is often the 4 case with fame, one can be destroyed by one's own success. Political groups which include college professors and intellectuals of a leftist political stripe have attempted to codify aspects of science into hard and fast dogma of religion. In particular, science has become the flagship for atheism with whole empires (the former USSR for one) worshiping certain misinterpreted aspects such as Darwinism and materialism as a church dogma in a state religion based upon these theories. Needless to say, if belief is based upon dogma then it isn't science anymore. What Exactly is Science? Science, as mathematician author John L. Casti has pointed out, means different things to different people. These include:1 Science: A set of facts and a set of theories that explain these facts. Science: A particular approach, the scientific method. Science: Whatever is being done by institutions carrying on scientific activity. Of course all of these can be and sometimes are simultaneously true, but generally speaking Casti notes that the nonscientific public usually opts for the last or possibly the first while actual scientists usually go for the second as their first choice. Facts, Theories, and Explanations Let us talk about the first choice. The universe is filled with facts. Everything you see going on about you every day are facts relating to the operation of the universe. Every human, every animal, every vegetable, every mineral indeed every invisible operation that takes place from moment to moment are facts of nature. The number of these facts is immense. We won't use the term “infinite' because that is a mathematical term generated by fantasy and does not relate to real actual facts we are talking about here. The point, however, is that there are so many “facts” occurring at any given minute that it is literally impossible for the human mind, let alone the brain, to comprehend them.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Views and Issues America's Atomic Veterans
    THE VIEWS AND ISSUES OF AMERICA’S ATOMIC VETERANS N-001 TRINITY SITE - NEW MEXICO THE FIRST ATOMIC BOMB TEST JULY 16, 1945 ATOMIC BOMB DROPPED OVER HIROSHIMA, JAPAN AUGUST 6, 1945 ATOMIC BOMB DROPPED OVER NAGASAKI, JAPAN AUGUST 9, 1945 N-002 TRINITY TEST - 07-16-45 - 19 KILOTONS N-003 HIROSHIMA 2 MILES FROM THE CENTER OF BLAST 08-07-45 N-004 HIROSHIMA 1.5 MILES FROM THE CENTER OF BLAST 08-07-45 N-005 “ FAT MAN “ DETONATION OVER CITY OF NAGASAKI PHOTO TAKEN BY A JAPANESE RAIL LINE SURVEYOR N-006 NAGASAKI 2.5 MILES FROM CENTER OF BLAST 08-10-45 N-007 NAGASAKI 1.5 MILES FROM CENTER OF BLAST 08-10-45 N-008 BIKINI ATOLL ( MARSHALL ISLANDS ) “ CROSSROADS “ 2 WEAPONS EFFECTS TESTS INVOLVING 42,000 MILITARY PERSONNEL N-009 38 MILES TEST ABLE TEST BAKER THERE WERE 23 ATOMIC WEAPONS TESTED ON BIKINI ATOLL N-010 CROSSROADS “ ABLE “ PHOTO FROM ISLAND CAMERA N-011 CROSSROADS “ BAKER “ PHOTO FROM AIRCRAFT N-012 CROSSROADS “ BAKER “ PHOTO FROM ISLAND CAMERA N-013 BIKINI ATOLL “ SANDSTONE “ 3 TESTS 10,000 + MILITARY PERSONNEL N-014 SANDSTONE “ X-RAY “ - 04-14-48 - BIKINI ATOLL TOWER SHOT 37 KILOTONS N-015 B-29 “ OVEREXPOSED “ AIR CREW BEING CHECKED FOR RADIATION AFTER RETURNING FROM ATOMIC CLOUD SAMPLING MISSION OVER BIKINI ATOLL N-016 NEVADA TEST SITE “ RANGER “ & “ BUSTER- JANGLE “ ( 11 TESTS ) 7,000 + MILITARY PESONNEL - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ENEWETAK ATOLL “ GREENHOUSE “ ( 5 TESTS ) 7,500 + MILITARY PERSONNEL N-017 CAMP DESERT ROCK MILITARY PERSONNEL ASSEMBLED FOR ATOMIC WEAPONS TEST BRIEFINGS N-018 GROUND OBSERVATION TROOPS ON WAY TO THEIR
    [Show full text]
  • Atomic Veterans' View Regarding VBDR
    The Atomic Veterans' View Regarding VBDR, Dose Reconstruction and the V. A. Claim Compensation Programs By: R. J. Ritter – C.E.M. Director - National Commander National Association of Atomic Veterans, Inc. February 16, 2007 1. Slide N001 On behalf of America’s atomic veteran community, I am pleased to offer their views, issues, comments and suggestions to the Veteran’s Advisory Board on Dose Re-construction, the Defense Threat Reduction Agency, the Department of Veteran’s Affairs, and those interested parties who are with us today. When first asked to prepare this presentation, I found it impossible to adequately convey, those views, concerns and opinions in 30 short minutes. It is well to note that America’s atomic veterans have been attempting, for the last 50+ years, to tell the stories of their experiences to those who have little or no interest in these events. With this in mind, I have selected a series of slides from a ( 90 minute ) public awareness program developed by NAAV, Inc., that will address their core issues within the allotted 30 minute period. This approach will adequately convey the depth, magnitude and importance of those radiation exposure events that were a critical part of their life experiences, and bring to the forefront the root cause for our presence here today. Slide N002 The year 1945 marked the dawn of the age of nuclear weapons, as the Manhattan Project proof tested the world’s first atomic bomb, and the decision by United States to used these atomic weapons to shorten the war in the Pacific.
    [Show full text]
  • Castle Bravo
    Defense Threat Reduction Agency Defense Threat Reduction Information Analysis Center 1680 Texas Street SE Kirtland AFB, NM 87117-5669 DTRIAC SR-12-001 CASTLE BRAVO: FIFTY YEARS OF LEGEND AND LORE A Guide to Off-Site Radiation Exposures January 2013 Distribution A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Trade Names Statement: The use of trade names in this document does not constitute an official endorsement or approval of the use of such commercial hardware or software. This document may not be cited for purposes of advertisement. REPORT Authored by: Thomas Kunkle Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico and Byron Ristvet Defense Threat Reduction Agency, Albuquerque, New Mexico SPECIAL Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing this collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704-0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS. 1. REPORT DATE (DD-MM-YYYY) 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Tickling the Sleeping Dragon's Tail: Should We Resume Nuclear Testing?
    TICKLING THE SLEEPING DRAGON’S TAIL Should We Resume Nuclear Testing? National Security Report Michael Frankel | James Scouras | George Ullrich TICKLING THE SLEEPING DRAGON’S TAIL Should We Resume Nuclear Testing? Michael Frankel James Scouras George Ullrich Copyright © 2021 The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory LLC. All Rights Reserved. “Tickling the sleeping dragon’s tail” is a metaphor for risking severe consequences by taking an unnecessary provocative action. Its origin can be traced to the last year of the Manhattan Project at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) in 1946. When investigating the critical mass of plutonium, LANL scientists usually brought two halves of a beryllium reflecting shell surrounding a fissile core closer together, observing the increase in reaction rate via a scintillation counter. They manually forced the two half-shells closer together by gripping them through a thumbhole at the top, while as a safety precaution, keeping the shells from completely closing by inserting shims. However, the habit of Louis Slotin was to remove the shims and keep the shells separated by manually inserting a screwdriver. Enrico Fermi is reported to have warned Slotin and others that they would be “dead within a year” if they continued this procedure. One day the screwdriver slipped, allowing the two half-shells to completely close, and the increased reflectivity drove the core toward criticality. Slotin immediately flipped the top half-shell loose with a flick of the screwdriver, but by then he had endured
    [Show full text]
  • Atomic Testing Photographs
    ATOMIC TESTING PHOTOGRAPHS PHOTO No. DESCRIPTION TRINITY Event - The TRINITY Test was the first atomic test conducted by the United States. This test was detonated at Alamogordo, New Mexico on July 16, 1945. XX-31 TRINITY Event - The first nuclear test ever conducted. The TRINITY Event, a 19-kiloton tower test, was exploded July 16, 1945 in NM. XX-18 TRINITY Event - Los Alamos, NM, the TRINITY fireball, 15 seconds after detonation of the first atomic bomb on July 16, 1945, rises into the air above the desert near the town of San Antonio, NM. XX-120 TRINITY Event - Los Alamos, NM, the fireball of the TRINITY explosion, .053 seconds after detonation, as it shook the desert near the town of San Antonio, NM, 16 July 1945. XX-104 Operation Crossroads, ABLE Event - First atomic bomb test at Bikini Lagoon, ABLE Day, 30 June 1946. The photograph shows the radioactive cloud still boiling up toward its maximum height of about 35,000 feet. XX-121 Operation Crossroads, ABLE Event - The ABLE Event, mushroom cloud attaining a height of 5 miles after the ABLE test explosion at Bikini; ABLE test was one of the Crossroads series, 30 June 1946.. XX-111 Operation Crossroads, BAKER Event - The BAKER Test was detonated on the Bikini Atoll on 24 July 1946. XX-71 Operation Crossroads, BAKER Event - Bikini BAKER Day, the mushroom cloud and first stages of the base surge following the underwater BAKER explosion at Bikini; water is beginning to fall back from the column into the lagoon, 24 July 1946. XX-113 Operation Sandstone - Atom bomb tests at Enewetak, Marshall Islands, April and May 1948, Operation Sandstone.
    [Show full text]
  • Operation Castle Summary Report of the Commander, Task Unit 13
    WT-934 (EX) EXTRACTED VERSION OPERATION CASTLE 410201 Summary Report of the Commander, Task Unit 13 Military Effects, Programs 1-9 Pacific Proving Grounds March – May 1954 Headquarters Field Command Armed Forces Special Weapons Project Sandia Base, Albuquerque, New Mexico January 30, 1959 NOTICE This isan extractof WT-934, OperationCASTLE, Summarv ,. ReDort of the Commander, Task Unit 13, which remains classifiedSECRET/RESTRICTED DATA as of thisdate. Extractversionprepared for: Director DEFENSE NUCLEAR AGENCY Washington, D.C. 20305 Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. 15 May 1981 ---- .—— ——. ..— — —. —-——. READ INSTRUCTIONS – — REPORT DOCUKEHTATION PAGE BEFORE COk\PLETING FOR~ .— .— _ . REI>ORT 14UMBCR ]1 GOVT AC CC!\l OM HO i. FItCIPICMT”S CATALOc NUMBER WT-934 (EX) ———. ~ I ——— — lIILZ (-d =bffff~) S. TYPE OF RCPORT A PERIOOCOVERCO Operation CASTLE Sumnary Report of the Commander, Task Unit 13 - Military Effects, Programs 1-9 t. PERJORUIMG ORG. RiIPORT NUMBER WT-934 (EX) AUTHOR(*) ● . C9MTRACT OR CRAHT NUMmc~.J K. D. Coleman, Col. USAF, et al —— ~–PfRf=:U===RGAH IZATIOM NAME ANDAoo_Es~ 10. PROGRAM ELEuEMT.PROJCCT~T ASK Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, AREA t WORK UNIT MUKSERS Weapons Effects Tests —— 1. COUTROLLIWG OfFICE 14AuE A~D AOORESS 12. REPORT OATE Headquarters, Field Command January 30, 1959 Armed Forces Special Weapons Project II,NUMBEROF PAGES Sandia Base, Albuquerque, New Mexico ._——— — 14.}40?41To RI14G AGENCY NAME h AODRESS (If d: ff. r.nl l,om Con fro fI/n# Of f;..) IS. SECURITY CLASS. (of fhl, ,.porfJ OECI_ASSIFICATIOH/DOWH GRAOING ._— —— = OISTRIBUTIOM s7ATEMEMT f~ff~f~ R*pOro S Approved for public release; unlimited distribution” —.
    [Show full text]
  • These Mind-Blowing Historic Photos of Atomic Bomb Tests Will Haunt Your Nightmares
    12/4/2020 These mind-blowing historic photos of atomic bomb tests will haunt your nightmares Home Politics Cable News Social Issues World Religion About Home » Featured • History • Science » These mind-blowing historic photos of atomic bomb tests Search this Site... SEARCH will haunt your nightmares These mind-blowing historic photos of atomic bomb We Recommend: tests will haunt your nightmares Watch this teacher refuse to accept an award from Paul Ryan in the middle of a posted by DeadState January 17, 2014 Featured, History, Science ceremony Neil deGrasse Tyson declares all-out war on creationists: ‘Keep it out’ of the science classroom These mind-blowing historic photos of atomic bomb tests will haunt your nightmares Gosselin twins go offscript during live TV interview, embarrass the hell out of their mom Watch this CNN reporter clearly get stoned during a report on Colorado’s new pot laws Subscribe to DeadState Enter your email address to subscribe to Dead State and receive notifications of new posts by All throughout the remote areas of the globe during the Cold War, scientists were testing atomic email. bombs. During these tests, photographs were routinely taken not just for the sake of record and research, but to be used as propaganda to intimidate anyone who would dare mess with the U.S. or Email Address USSR’s military power. Subscribe Each of these images are simultaneously terrifying, beautiful and haunting. It’s truly the stuff of nightmares. Look (h/t: io9): Find DeadState on Facebook High-speed photos by Harold “Doc” Edgerton,
    [Show full text]
  • Enewetak Fact Book (A Resume'of Pre-Cleanup Information)
    t)/^. 103 I ^1*9- NVO-214 M^. \ ENEWETAK FACT BOOK (A RESUME'OF PRE-CLEANUP INFORMATION) COMPILED BY WAYNE BLISS U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY °° "%rr "^« COMPILED 1977 PUBLISHED SEPTEMBER 1982 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NEVADA OPERATIONS OFFICE LAS VEGAS, NEVADA ' -> '3 i-'M'Kirta M DISCLAIMER "This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favor­ ing by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof." This report has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available from the National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, Springfield, Virginia 22161 Price: Printed Copy A10 Microfiche A01 Codes are used for pricing all publications. The code is determined by the number of pages in the publication. Information pertaining to the pricing codes can be found in the current issues of the following publications, which are generally available in most libraries: Energy Research Abstracts (ERA); Government Reports Announcements and Index (GRA and I); Scientific and Technical Abstract Reports (STAR); and publication NTIS-PR-360, available from NTIS at the above address.
    [Show full text]
  • Gallery of U.S. Nuclear Tests by Carey Sublette
    archived as http://www.stealthskater.com/Documents/Nuke_16.pdf more of Nuclear Weapons at http://www.stealthskater.com/Nuke.htm note: because important websites are frequently "here today but gone tomorrow", the following was archived from http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Usa/Tests/index.html on July 21, 2005. This is NOT an attempt to divert readers from the aforementioned website. Indeed, the reader should only read this back-up copy if it cannot be found at the original author's site. Gallery of U.S. Nuclear Tests by Carey Sublette Last changed 6 August 2001 Between July 16, 1945 and September 23, 1992, the United States of America conducted (by official count) 1,054 nuclear tests and 2 nuclear attacks. The number of actual nuclear devices (aka "bombs") tested and nuclear explosions is larger than this, but harder to establish precisely. Some devices that were tested failed to produce any noticeable explosion (some by design, some not). Other "tests" (by official definition) were actually multiple device detonations. It is not clear whether all multiple device tests have yet been identified and enumerated. These pages focus principally (although not exclusively) on the period from July 16, 1945 to November 4, 1962 -- the era of atmospheric testing*. There are a number of reasons for this. These early years marked the height of the Cold War when the U.S. nuclear weapons establishment came into being, when the major breakthroughs in weapon design occurred, and when the most severe effects of nuclear testing were felt around the World. During this period, test series were grand operations involving huge numbers of people.
    [Show full text]
  • Reflections of a Tester
    Reflections of a Tester Dr. Robert R. Brownlee August, 2011 Dr. Robert R. Brownlee Points To Be Covered Moments in History Worth Reviewing Short History of Atmospheric Tests August, 2011 Dr. Robert R. Brownlee Introductory Thought • Ralph Waldo Emerson once wrote ―There is properly no history, only biography.‖ • This quote is really a truism! • Nowhere is found a discipline derived from fewer individuals than is ―atomic energy.‖ • Every fact or event given here is owed to individuals whose names I can remember (maybe!). August, 2011 Dr. Robert R. Brownlee Why Do We Have Nuclear Weapons, Anyway? • In 1943, we had ample evidence that we might not win the war! Nuclear Energy (first) was seen by some as the only way to assure victory • In 1944, winning in Europe was likely. • In 1944-45, winning in Japan looked torturous, and Bloody. August, 2011 Dr. Robert R. Brownlee What Role Did We Envisage for the First Two Atom Bombs? • Slaughter in the Pacific grew day by day • Two-thirds of deaths there occurred in last 10 months of the war • We had killed 400,000 people in bombing raids without any offers for surrender • New Goal: Stop the War Before the Invasion of Japan August, 2011 Dr. Robert R. Brownlee Nuclear Explosions Appear • 16 July 1945 Trinity test. • 06 Aug 1945 Hiroshima. • 09 Aug 1945 Nagasaki. • 02 Sept 1945 Japan surrenders! August, 2011 Dr. Robert R. Brownlee And, That’s That! August, 2011 Dr. Robert R. Brownlee Well, Not Quite! • 16 Oct 1945 Adm. King details Navy interest, wants JCS to be in charge • 22 Dec 1945 Nuclear test planning begins • 07 Mar 1946 167 Bikini natives evacuated • 01 July 1946 Crossroads Able test • 24 July 1946 Crossroads Baker test August, 2011 Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • An Examination of Nuclear Weapons in the 20Th Century
    An Examination of Nuclear Weapons in the 20th Century By Samantha Mechelle Gauthier April 27, 2017 Advisor: Peter Hansen A Major Qualifying Project Report Submitted to the Faculty of Worcester Polytechnic Institute In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree in Bachelors of Science In International and Global Studies Abstract This paper examines the ways in which the 20th century was dominated by the presence of nuclear weapons, by showcasing the major focal points in a chronological sequence. The examination reveals the ways in which nuclear weapons changed the world and provides us with concrete examples of the tragedy that surrounds their use, the damaging results of experimental tests, and the ways in which it can quickly escalate into war. Recalling these concrete examples is critical when examining current international affairs. Acknowledgements I would like to thank my advisor Peter Hansen for his guidance and understanding while conduction my project. I would also like to thank Evelyn and Helene for their efforts to help thinking process and writing. And lastly I would like to thank Cathylynn, Matthew, Felix, and all my close family members for their support over the past year. 2 Contents Abstract ..................................................................................................................................................... 2 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 233U/236U Signature Allows to Distinguish Environmental Emissions of Civil Nuclear Industry from Weapons Fallout ✉ K
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by KITopen ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15008-2 OPEN 233U/236U signature allows to distinguish environmental emissions of civil nuclear industry from weapons fallout ✉ K. Hain 1 , P. Steier 1, M.B. Froehlich 2, R. Golser1, X. Hou 3, J. Lachner 1,7, T. Nomura4, J. Qiao3, F. Quinto 5 & A. Sakaguchi6 1234567890():,; Isotopic ratios of radioactive releases into the environment are useful signatures for con- tamination source assessment. Uranium is known to behave conservatively in sea water so that a ratio of uranium trace isotopes may serve as a superior oceanographic tracer. Here we present data on the atomic 233U/236U ratio analyzed in representative environmental samples finding ratios of (0.1–3.7)Á10À2. The ratios detected in compartments of the environment affected by releases of nuclear power production or by weapons fallout differ by one order of magnitude. Significant amounts of 233U were only released in nuclear weapons fallout, either produced by fast neutron reactions or directly by 233U-fueled devices. This makes the 233U/236U ratio a promising new fingerprint for radioactive emissions. Our findings indicate a higher release of 233U by nuclear weapons tests before the maximum of global fallout in 1963, setting constraints on the design of the nuclear weapons employed. 1 Faculty of Physics, Isotope Physics, University of Vienna, Währinger Str. 17, 1090 Vienna, Austria. 2 Department of Nuclear Physics, Australian National University, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia. 3 Department of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, DTU Risø Campus, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark.
    [Show full text]