I Social Organisms: Biology and British Fiction in the Nineteenth
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Social Organisms: Biology and British Fiction in the Nineteenth Century by Phillip Stillman Department of English Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Nancy Armstrong, Supervisor ___________________________ Kathy Psomiades ___________________________ Robert Mitchell ___________________________ Mark Hansen Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of English in the Graduate School of Duke University 2018 i v ABSTRACT Social Organisms: Biology and British Fiction in the Nineteenth Century by Phillip Stillman Department of English Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Nancy Armstrong, Supervisor ___________________________ Kathy Psomiades ___________________________ Robert Mitchell ___________________________ Mark Hansen An abstract of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of English in the Graduate School of Duke University 2018 i v Copyright by Phillip Stillman 2018 Abstract My argument is that the rise of biology at the start of the nineteenth challenged the individualism of the Enlightenment, and that it fell to the novel to enable readers to reimagine themselves in light of the resulting contradictions. Chapter one considers how the eighteenth-century individual was dismantled, chapter two looks at the human organism erected in its place, and chapter three accounts for how human organisms form communities. By factoring fiction into the break between natural history and biology that Foucault identifies in The Order of Things (1966), I consider the effect of that epistemological shift on the history of subjectivity. In my first chapter I use Gillray’s satirical cartoon, The Cow-pock (1802), to show how the concept of a human being who is at once individual and organism was an unlivable contradiction, and how that contradiction played out in the cultural conflicts of the time. In the next chapter I use Shelley’s Frankenstein (1818) to argue that the novel reimagined life within that contradiction by reconfiguring individuation into an uncertain process whose goal is both unattainable and dangerous. Finally, I use Dickens’s Dombey and Son (1848) to show how the novel developed a new conception of community suited to the self-contradiction of the individual as organism. iv Dedication This dissertation is dedicated to Seth Denizen, a teacher from the beginning. v Contents Abstract .......................................................................................................................................... iv List of Figures ............................................................................................................................ viii Acknowledgements ..................................................................................................................... ix 1. Introduction: The End of Taxonomy ...................................................................................... 1 1.2 The Human Organism and the Study of Nineteenth-Century Fiction ................... 20 1.2.1 A Historical Teratology, Part 1: Mary Toft ............................................................ 34 1.2.2 A Historical Teratology, Part 2: William Ince ........................................................ 39 1.2.3 A Historical Teratology, Part 3: Frankenstein’s Creature .................................... 43 1.2.4 A Historical Teratology, Part 4: Heathcliff ............................................................ 50 1.3 Competition and Mutualism ......................................................................................... 59 2. The Human Organism ............................................................................................................ 64 2.1 Gillray’s “The Cow-Pock” and the Emergence of the Human Organism .............. 67 2.2 Chamber’s Vestiges and the Order of the Organism ................................................ 81 2.2.1 Autogenesis ................................................................................................................ 85 2.2.2 Milieu ........................................................................................................................... 93 2.2.3 Excess ........................................................................................................................... 97 2.3 The Order of the Organism ......................................................................................... 102 2.4 The Organism, The Individual, and the Novel ........................................................ 110 3. Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein: The Subject in the Age of the Organism .......................... 114 3.1 The Human Exception: A Contradiction in Terms .................................................. 121 vi 3.2 The Creature .................................................................................................................. 140 3.2.1 How to Become a Monster ..................................................................................... 149 3.2.2 One Bad Turn Deserves Another .......................................................................... 174 3.3 The Average Man ......................................................................................................... 186 3.3.1 The New Normal ..................................................................................................... 190 3.4 Victorian Fiction ............................................................................................................ 197 4. Dombey and Son and The Problematic of Darwinism ....................................................... 200 4.1 Mutualism and Competition in The Voyage of the Beagle .................................... 205 4.2 The Milieu of Dombey and Son .................................................................................. 222 4.3 Mutualism and the Vitality of Flat Characters ......................................................... 227 4.4 The law of Toodles and the law of Dombey ............................................................. 234 4.5 The Sentimental Novel in the Age of the Organism ................................................ 239 4.6 From Sentiment to Affect ............................................................................................. 251 5. Conclusion: A Novel Ecology .............................................................................................. 260 Works Cited ............................................................................................................................... 265 Biography ................................................................................................................................... 282 vii List of Figures Figure 1: "The Cow-Pock, or, the Wonderful Effects of the New Innoculation!" by James Gillray, 1802. ................................................................................................................................ 68 Figure 2: "Polly Rescues the Charitable Grinder" by Phiz, 1848. ........................................ 242 viii Acknowledgements There are far too many people I should thank, and there is far too little time to thank them all here. I couldn’t have done this with out the indefatigable support of my friends, A-J Aronstein, Galadriel Rosen, Hilary Strang, Elaine Hadley, Ryan Vu, Laura Jaramillo, Any Gwinn, Patricia Bass, Stephan Waldschmidt, and Hillary Porter. I must also thank Robert Mitchell, Mark Hansen and Leonard Tennenhouse for their invaluable feedback, and Kathy Psomiades for her profound and ongoing dedication to countless students, among whom I consider myself honored to be one. Finally, and most importantly, Nancy Armstrong went and continues to go so far above and beyond the requirements of her role as my director that I can only, with all humility, express my profoundest gratitude. ix 1. Introduction: The End of Taxonomy The space of Western knowledge is now about to topple: the taxinomia, whose great, universal expanse extended in correlation with the possibility of a mathesis, and which constituted the down-beat of knowledge—at once its primary possibility and the end of its perfection—is now about to order itself in accordance with an obscure verticality: a verticality that is to define the law of resemblances, prescribe all adjacencies and discontinuities, provide the foundation for perceptible arrangements, and displace all the great horizontal deployments of the taxinomia towards the somewhat accessory region of consequences. Thus, European culture is inventing for itself a depth in which what matters is no longer identities, distinctive characters, permanent tables with all their possible paths and routes, but great hidden forces developed on the basis of their primitive and inaccessible nucleus, origin, causality, and history (Order, 251). In The Order of Things: An Archeology of the Human Sciences (1966), Michel Foucault identified an “epistemic” shift in the way that Western culture produced knowledge, and thus in the forms of knowledge produced (351). During what he called the final century of the “classical episteme,” the production of knowledge required men to observe the universal laws of grammar, the unchanging natural taxonomy of living beings, and the production and circulation of wealth. The abrupt shift to what can now be understood as the