DOCSLIB.ORG

Prosecuting Al Baghdadi How the United States Should Put the Leader of the Islamic State on Trial for His Crimes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Prosecuting Al Baghdadi How the United States Should Put the Leader of the Islamic State on Trial for His Crimes Prosecuting al Baghdadi How the United States Should Put the Leader of the Islamic State on Trial for His Crimes Nicholas Ryan Turza Prepared for use by Captain Jamie Sands, USN Counterterrorism and Operations Director for the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low Intensity Conflict (ASD SO/LIC), US Department of Defense MPP Candidate T h e Sanford School of P u b l i c P o l i c y Duke University Juris Doctor Candidate University of North Carolina School of Law 4 / 1 7 / 2 0 1 5 Prosecuting al Baghdadi How the Pentagon Should Put the Leader of the Islamic State on Trial for His Crimes Prepared for use by Captain Jamiefor the Sands, USN Counterterrorism and Operations Director Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low Intensity Conflict (ASD SO/LIC), US Department of Defense Authored by Nicholas Turza Master of Public Policy Candidate The Sanford School of Public Policy, Duke University Juris Doctor Candidate University of NorthAdvised Carolina by School of Law Tim Nichols, Executive Director of Duke University’s Counterterrorism and Public Policy Fellowship Program, Triangle Center on Terrorism and Homeland Security April 17, 2015 Disclaimer: The author prepared this paper in completion of the requirements for his Master’s Project, a major assignment for the Master of Public Policy Program at the Sanford School of Public Policy at Duke University. The research, analysis, and policy alternatives and recommendations contained in this paper are the work of the student who authored the document, and do not represent the official or unofficial views of the Sanford School of Public Policy or of Duke University. Without the specific permission of its author, this paper may not be used or cited for any purpose other than to inform the client organization about the subject matter. 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary ...............................................................................................................................4 I. Introduction of the Problem ...........................................................................................................7 II. Background of The Islamic State and its Leader, Abu Bakr al Baghdadi......................9 A. The Islamic State and Its Crimes.............................................................................................9 B. Al-Baghdadi and His Crimes .................................................................................................. 12 III. The Value of Capture / Prosecution Strategies ................................................................. 14 A. Background of Scholarship on Decapitation Strategies.............................................. 14 B. Independent Statistical Analysis in Support of Capture Strategies ........................ 16 IV. Legal Issues Relevant to Any Prosecution Strategy ......................................................... 17 A. The Irrelevance of Iraqi or Syrian Sovereignty to COA Analysis ............................. 17 B. Federal Law of Military Detention and Military Commissions................................. 19 V. Courses of Action of Possible Prosecution ............................................................................ 24 A. COA #1: Prosecution by an International Tribunal ...................................................... 24 a. Background .............................................................................................................................. 25 b. Method....................................................................................................................................... 28 c. Analysis of Challenges .......................................................................................................... 32 B. COA #2: Prosecution by a United States Attorney ........................................................ 38 a. Background .............................................................................................................................. 38 b. Method....................................................................................................................................... 40 c. Analysis of Challenges.......................................................................................................... 47 C. COA #3: Prosecution by An Allied Arab Government .................................................. 58 a. Background and Method..................................................................................................... 60 b. Analysis of Challenges.......................................................................................................... 64 VI. Comparative Analysis .................................................................................................................. 70 A. Criteria............................................................................................................................................ 70 B. Analysis of Each COA by each Criterion ............................................................................ 70 a. COA #1: Prosecution by an International Tribunal .................................................. 70 b. COA #2: Prosecution by a United States Attorney.................................................... 73 c. COA #3: Prosecution by an Allied Arab Government............................................... 76 D. Analysis Matrix ........................................................................................................................... 80 2 Appendix A: Independent Data Analysis .................................................................................... 81 I. Data................................................................................................................................................... 81 a. Data Overview......................................................................................................................... 81 b. Missing and Duplicative Data............................................................................................ 82 II. Significant Variables ................................................................................................................. 82 a. Dependent Variables ............................................................................................................ 82 b. Independent (Treatment) Variables .............................................................................. 82 c. Control Variables.................................................................................................................... 84 II. Model Overview.......................................................................................................................... 85 III. Findings and Analysis............................................................................................................. 87 a. Results........................................................................................................................................ 87 b. Sensitivity Analysis ............................................................................................................... 88 c. Discussion ................................................................................................................................. 88 Appendix B: Independent Data Analysis, Tables..................................................................... 90 Appendix C: Why ISIL is Not a Sovereign State in International Law ............................. 92 A. Criteria of Statehood in International Law ...................................................................... 92 B. Lack of Recognition ................................................................................................................... 96 Appendix D: A Brief Overview of the USG and the ICC.......................................................... 98 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Client Problem: The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (“ISIL”) is a growing international terror threat. It has seized territory, and it challenges the fragile governmentsPolicy Question of Iraq: and Syria. It threatens US core values and global interests. How should the United States Government (“USG”) prosecute theOverallISIL leaderRecommendation, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadis: (“ABAB”), if it captures him? 1) The USG should consider the empirically proven benefits of capturing terrorist leaders rather killing than them . Both the scholarship discussed in Part III and the independent statistical analysis discussed in Appendix A shows the empiricism behind the benefits. The empirical evidence suggests decapitation hastens the demise of terror groups, but that “capture” decapitation strategies do so more than “kill” strategies. The intuitive rationale is that capture yields intelligence from interrogation and 2) Theprosecu USGtion should rendersonly a strategicopt for a communicationscapture / prosecuteimpact strategy of the ruleonce of it law. has sufficient admissible evidence to secure a conviction . This calculation must be made for whichever court policymakers intend to try him. Different courts have different rules of evidence and pose different practical and procedural hurdles to bringing evidence before a judge and jury. If the USG can link ABAB to ISIL’s crimes only through classified documents and source- protected witnesses, then prosecutors may not have sufficient evidence to convict without that information. This dilemma is more problematic the more
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Libya's Fight for Survival
    LIBYA’S FIGHT FOR SURVIVAL DEFEATING JIHADIST NETWORKS September 2015 ! ! ! TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD 3 ESSAY ONE COMPETING JIHADIST ORGANISATIONS AND NETWORKS 6 Islamic State, Al-Qaeda, Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb and Ansar al-Sharia in Libya Stefano Torelli and Arturo Varvelli ESSAY TWO POLITICAL PARTY OR ARMED FACTION? 31 The Future of the Libyan Muslim Brotherhood Valentina Colombo, Giuseppe Dentice and Arturo Varvelli ESSAY THREE MAPPING RADICAL ISLAMIST MILITIAS IN LIBYA 53 Wolfgang Pusztai and Arturo Varvelli ESSAY FOUR THE EXPLOITATION OF MIGRATION ROUTES TO EUROPE 73 Human Trafficking Through Areas of Libya Affected by Fundamentalism Nancy Porsia ABOUT THE AUTHORS 87 BIBLIOGRAPHY 89 2 LIBYA’S FIGHT FOR SURVIVAL DEFEATING JIHADIST NETWORKS LIBYA’S FIGHT FOR SURVIVAL 3 DEFEATING JIHADIST NETWORKS FOREWORD ! ! This publication is a compilation of four different essays, edited by Dr. Arturo Varvelli PhD, which from part of a series of studies undertaken by EFD to analyse the nature and spread of the phenomenon of radicalisation in the European Eastern and Southern neighbourhoods. It focuses on Libya and assesses the current situation on the ground through a number of diverse and varied prisms. It identifies patterns and trends as well as specific local and regional developments in order to provide a comprehensive overview of the situation of radicalisation in post-Ghadaffi Libya and the extent to which this may be contributing to regional as well as international instability Months of acute political turmoil in Libya following the fall of the Qaddafi regime, compounded by a weak national identity as well as legacies from the civil war in 2011 which ended Qaddafi’s 42-year rule, have resulted in Libya becoming a failed state with a strong radical Islamist presence.
    [Show full text]
  • Libya: Conflict, Transition, and U.S
    Libya: Conflict, Transition, and U.S. Policy Updated April 13, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov RL33142 SUMMARY RL33142 Libya: Conflict, Transition, and U.S. Policy April 13, 2020 Libya’s political transition has been disrupted by armed non-state groups and threatened by the indecision and infighting of interim leaders. After a uprising ended the 40-plus-year rule of Christopher M. Blanchard Muammar al Qadhafi in 2011, interim authorities proved unable to form a stable government, Specialist in Middle address security issues, reshape the country’s finances, or create a viable framework for post- Eastern Affairs conflict justice and reconciliation. Insecurity spread as local armed groups competed for influence and resources. Qadhafi compounded stabilization challenges by depriving Libyans of experience in self-government, stifling civil society, and leaving state institutions weak. Militias, local leaders, and coalitions of national figures with competing foreign patrons remain the most powerful arbiters of public affairs. An atmosphere of persistent lawlessness has enabled militias, criminals, and Islamist terrorist groups to operate with impunity, while recurrent conflict has endangered civilians’ rights and safety. Issues of dispute have included governance, military command, national finances, and control of oil infrastructure. Key Issues and Actors in Libya. After a previous round of conflict in 2014, the country’s transitional institutions fragmented. A Government of National Accord (GNA) based in the capital, Tripoli, took power under the 2015 U.N.- brokered Libyan Political Agreement. Leaders of the House of Representatives (HOR) that were elected in 2014 declined to endorse the GNA, and they and a rival interim government based in eastern Libya have challenged the GNA’s authority with support from the Libyan National Army/Libyan Arab Armed Forces (LNA/LAAF) movement.
    [Show full text]
  • Jihadism in Africa Local Causes, Regional Expansion, International Alliances
    SWP Research Paper Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik German Institute for International and Security Affairs Guido Steinberg and Annette Weber (Eds.) Jihadism in Africa Local Causes, Regional Expansion, International Alliances RP 5 June 2015 Berlin All rights reserved. © Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik, 2015 SWP Research Papers are peer reviewed by senior researchers and the execu- tive board of the Institute. They express exclusively the personal views of the authors. SWP Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik German Institute for International and Security Affairs Ludwigkirchplatz 3­4 10719 Berlin Germany Phone +49 30 880 07-0 Fax +49 30 880 07-100 www.swp-berlin.org [email protected] ISSN 1863-1053 Translation by Meredith Dale (Updated English version of SWP-Studie 7/2015) Table of Contents 5 Problems and Recommendations 7 Jihadism in Africa: An Introduction Guido Steinberg and Annette Weber 13 Al-Shabaab: Youth without God Annette Weber 31 Libya: A Jihadist Growth Market Wolfram Lacher 51 Going “Glocal”: Jihadism in Algeria and Tunisia Isabelle Werenfels 69 Spreading Local Roots: AQIM and Its Offshoots in the Sahara Wolfram Lacher and Guido Steinberg 85 Boko Haram: Threat to Nigeria and Its Northern Neighbours Moritz Hütte, Guido Steinberg and Annette Weber 99 Conclusions and Recommendations Guido Steinberg and Annette Weber 103 Appendix 103 Abbreviations 104 The Authors Problems and Recommendations Jihadism in Africa: Local Causes, Regional Expansion, International Alliances The transnational terrorism of the twenty-first century feeds on local and regional conflicts, without which most terrorist groups would never have appeared in the first place. That is the case in Afghanistan and Pakistan, Syria and Iraq, as well as in North and West Africa and the Horn of Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Libya's Fight for Survival
    LIBYIA’S FIGHT FOR SURVIVAL DEFEATING JIHADIST NETWORKS September 2015 About the European Foundation for Democracy The European Foundation for Democracy is a Brussels-based policy institute dedicated to upholding Europe’s fundamental values of freedom and equality, regardless of gender, ethnicity or religion. Today these principles are being challenged by a number of factors, among them rapid social change as a result of high levels of immigration from cultures with different customs, a rise in intolerance on all sides, an increasing sense of a conflict of civilisations and the growing influence of radical, extremist ideologies worldwide. We work with grassroots activists, media, policy experts and government officials throughout Europe to identify constructive approaches to addressing these challenges. Our goal is to ensure that the universal values of the Enlightenment –religious tolerance, political pluralism, individual liberty and government by demo- cracy – remain the core foundation of Europe’s prosperity and welfare, and the basis on which diverse cultures and opinions can interact peacefully. About the Counter Extremism Project The Counter Extremism Project (CEP) is a not-for-profit, non-partisan, international policy organization formed to address the threat from extremist ideology. It does so by pressuring financial support networks, countering the narrative of extremists and their online recruitment, and advocating for effective laws, policies and regula- tions. CEP uses its research and analytical expertise to build a global movement against the threat to pluralism, peace and tolerance posed by extremism of all types. In the United States, CEP is based in New York City with a team in Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Libya's Fight for Survival
    LIBYA’S FIGHT FOR SURVIVAL DEFEATING JIHADIST NETWORKS September 2015 LIBYA’S FIGHTLIBYA’S FOR SURVIVAL: DEFEATING JIHADIST NETWORKS About the European Foundation for Democracy The European Foundation for Democracy is a Brussels-based policy institute dedicated to upholding Europe’s fundamental values of freedom and equality, regardless of gender, ethnicity or religion. We work with grassroots activists, media, policy experts and government officials throughout Europe to identify constructive approaches to addressing these challenges. Our goal is to ensure that the universal values of the Enlightenment – political pluralism, individual liberty and government by democracy and religious tolerance – remain the core foundation of Europe’s prosperity and welfare, and the basis on which diverse cultures and opinions can interact peacefully. About the Counter Extremism Project The Counter Extremism Project is a not-for-profit, non-partisan, international policy organi- sation formed to address the threat from extremist ideology. It does so by pressuring financial support networks, countering the narrative of extremists and their online recruitment, and advo- cating for effective laws, policies and regulations. CEP uses its research and analytical expertise to build a global movement against the threat to pluralism, peace and tolerance posed by extremism of all types. In the United States, CEP is based in New York City with a team in Washington, D.C. LIBYA’S FIGHT FOR SURVIVAL DEFEATING JIHADIST NETWORKS September 2015 Edited by Arturo Varvelli
    [Show full text]
  • Ansar Al-Sharia in Libya (ASL) Type Of
    Ansar al-Sharia in Libya (ASL) Type of Organization: insurgent, non-state actor, religious, social services provider, terrorist, violent Ideologies and Affiliations: Islamist, jihadist, Qutbist, Salafist, Sunni, Takfiri Place(s) of Origin: Libya Year of Origin: 2012 Founder(s): Abu Sufyan Bin Qumu (founder of Ansar al-Sharia in Derna);1 Mohamed al-Zahawi, Nasser al-Tarshani, and other Libyan Islamists (founders of Ansar al-Sharia Benghazi) Place(s) of Operation: Libya Also Known As: • Ansar al-Charia in Libya 2 • Katibat Ansar al-Charia 3 • Katibat Ansar al-Sharia 4 • Partisans of Islamic Law in Libya5 • Partisans of Sharia in Libya 6 • Supporters of Islamic Law in Libya7 • Supporters of Sharia in Libya 8 Executive Summary: Ansar al-Sharia in Libya (ASL) is a violent jihadist group that seeks to implement sharia (Islamic law) in Libya. ASL is the union of two smaller groups, the Ansar al-Sharia Brigade in Benghazi (ASB) and Ansar al-Sharia Derna (ASD), each formed in 2011 after the fall of Libyan dictator Muammar Gaddafi’s regime. In 2012, ASB and ASD, 1 Aaron Y. Zelin, “Know Your Ansar Al-Sharia,” Foreign Policy, September 21, 2012, http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2012/09/21/know_your_ansar_al_sharia. 2 “Security Council Al-Qaida Sanctions Committee Adds Two Entities to Its Sanctions List,” United Nations, November 19, 2014, http://www.un.org/press/en/2014/sc11659.doc.htm. 3 “Security Council Al-Qaida Sanctions Committee Adds Two Entities to Its Sanctions List,” United Nations, November 19, 2014, http://www.un.org/press/en/2014/sc11659.doc.htm. 4 “Security Council Al-Qaida Sanctions Committee Adds Two Entities to Its Sanctions List,” United Nations, November 19, 2014, http://www.un.org/press/en/2014/sc11659.doc.htm.
    [Show full text]
  • With Liberty and Justice for All: an Examination of the United States' Compliance with Rule of Law As It Relates to Domestic and International Terrorism
    Wright State University CORE Scholar Browse all Theses and Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 2018 With Liberty and Justice for All: An Examination of the United States' Compliance with Rule of Law as it relates to Domestic and International Terrorism Jonathan William Maze Wright State University Follow this and additional works at: https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/etd_all Part of the International Relations Commons Repository Citation Maze, Jonathan William, "With Liberty and Justice for All: An Examination of the United States' Compliance with Rule of Law as it relates to Domestic and International Terrorism" (2018). Browse all Theses and Dissertations. 1962. https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/etd_all/1962 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at CORE Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Browse all Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of CORE Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL: AN EXAMINATION OF THE UNITED STATES’ COMPLIANCE WITH RULE OF LAW AS IT RELATES TO DOMESTIC AND INTERNATIONAL TERRORISM A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts By JONATHAN WILLIAM MAZE B.A., Wright State University, 2013 2018 Wright State University WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL April 19, 2018 I HEREBY RECOMMEND THAT THE THESIS PREPARED UNDER MY SUPERVISION BY Jonathan William Maze ENTITLED With Liberty and Justice for All: An Examination of the United States’ Compliance with Rule of Law as it relates to Domestic and International Terrorism BE ACCEPTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF Master of Arts.
    [Show full text]
  • How Al-Qaeda Survived Drones, Uprisings,And the Islamic State
    How al-Qaeda Survived Drones, Uprisings,and the Islamic State THE NATURE OF THE CURRENT THREAT Aaron Y. Zelin, Editor “Al-Qaeda and its affiliate organizations never stopped being a primary terrorism concern for me, for the U.S. intelligence community, and for the broader counterter- rorism community. Not a day has gone by in my entire tenure at NCTC where our emphasis on al-Qaeda has been anything less than a top priority. That’s the beauty of working on terrorism issues. You get the privilege of having multiple top priorities.” —Nicholas Rasmussen Director, National Counterterrorism Center, comments at The Washington Institute March 1, 2017 How al-Qaeda Survived Drones, Uprisings,and the Islamic State THE NATURE OF THE CURRENT THREAT Aaron Y. Zelin EDITOR THE WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY www.washingtoninstitute.org The opinions expressed in this Policy Focus are those of the authors and not necessarily those of The Washington Institute, its Board of Trustees, or its Board of Advisors. Policy Focus 153 First publication June 2017 All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. © 2017 by The Washington Institute for Near East Policy The Washington Institute for Near East Policy 11111 19th Street NW, Suite 500 Washington, DC 20036 www.washingtoninstitute.org Design: 1000colors Contents ACKNOWLEDGMENTS | v ABOUT THE WORKSHOP | vi CONTRIBUTORS | viii KEY AL-QAEDA-RELATED EVENTS, 2009–17 | xii ■ OVERALL THREAT Introduction AARON Y.
    [Show full text]
  • Libya: Transition and U.S
    Libya: Transition and U.S. Policy ,name redacted, Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs January 8, 2018 Congressional Research Service 7-.... www.crs.gov RL33142 Libya: Transition and U.S. Policy Summary Libya’s political transition has been disrupted by armed non-state groups and threatened by the indecision and infighting of interim leaders. After an armed uprising ended the 40-plus-year rule of Muammar al Qadhafi in late 2011, interim authorities proved unable to form a stable government, address pressing security issues, reshape the country’s public finances, or create a viable framework for post-conflict justice and reconciliation. Elections for legislative bodies and a constitutional drafting assembly were held and transparently administered in 2012 and 2014, but were marred by declining rates of participation, threats to candidates and voters, and zero-sum political competition. Insecurity remained prevalent in Libya following the 2011 conflict and deepened in 2014, driven by overlapping ideological, personal, financial, and transnational rivalries. Issues of dispute have included governance, military command, national finances, and control of oil infrastructure. Resulting conflicts involving Libyans in different parts of the country drove the political transition off course. At present, armed militia groups and locally organized political leaders remain the most powerful arbiters of public affairs. Criminals and violent Islamist extremists have exploited these conditions, and the latter remain active inside Libya and threaten Libya’s neighbors. The 2017 U.S. Africa Command (AFRICOM) Posture Statement stated that “the instability in Libya and North Africa may be the most significant, near-term threat to U.S. and allies’ interests” in Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Inside Libya Chaos in the Mediterranean
    Middle East Council Inside Libya Chaos in the mediterranean Kwasi Kwarteng MP Leo Docherty March 2017 Conservative Middle East Council INSIDE LIBYA: CHAOS IN THE MEDITERRANEAN Conservative Middle East Council INSIDE LIBYA: CHAOS IN THE MEDITERRANEAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY KEY FINDINGS • Field Marshal Haftar sees his mission as fighting jihadist terrorism. • A large degree of order and governance exists in Eastern Libya. • Despite being under pressure, the East remains stable while the West is plagued by disorder and insecurity. • The House of Representatives is a nucleus for the development of a Libyan Parliamentary system, and has a geographical reach across Libya. • Western Libya, particularly Tripoli itself, is dominated by warlords and criminal gangs; they all have an interest in prolonging the relative confusion in the West. KEY RECOMMENDATIONS • The UK should urgently engage with Haftar, the LNA and the HoR • The UK should support the LNA to secure Libya’s borders and bring an end to the illegal trafficking of people from Libya’s sea ports. • The UK should reconsider its view of the GNA and acknowledge its limited capacity to deliver any kind of governance or security for Libya. 1 Conservative Middle East Council INSIDE LIBYA: CHAOS IN THE MEDITERRANEAN DELEGATION TO LIBYA – MARCH 2017 OVERVIEW In the first week of March 2017 CMEC Vice Chairman Kwasi Kwarteng MP, and CMEC Director Leo Docherty, travelled to Libya to meet the Commander of the Libyan National Army (LNA) Field Marshal Khalifa Haftar. They also met the Speaker of the House of Representatives (HoR), Aguila Saleh, and members of the House of Representatives.
    [Show full text]
  • Libya's Terrorism Challenge
    Lydia Sizer Policy Paper 2017-1 October 2017 Libya’s Terrorism Challenge Assessing the Salafi-Jihadi Threat © 2017 The Middle East Institute The Middle East Institute 1319 18th Street NW Washington, D.C. 20036 Follow MEI: @MiddleEastInst /MiddleEastInstitute /user/middleastinstitute MEI Policy Paper 2017-1 Libya’s Terrorism Challenge Assessing the Salafi- Jihadi Threat Lydia Sizer Middle East Institute Counterterrorism Series Abbreviations AFRICOM U.S. Africa Command AQIM Al-Qaeda in the Maghreb B.D.B. Benghazi Defense Brigades B.R.S.C. Benghazi Revolutionaries Shura Council D.M.S.C. Derna Mujahideen Shura Council E.U. European Union F.I.U. Financial Intelligence Unit G.N.A. Government of National Accord ISIS the Islamic State K.F.R. Kidnapping For Ransom L.I.F.G. Libyan Islamic Fighting Group L.N.A. Libyan National Army MANPAD Man-Portable air defense system MENAFATF Middle East and North Africa Financial Affairs Task Force MOJWA Movement for Oneness and Jihad in West Africa N.G.O. Non-Governmental Organization U.A.E. United Arab Emirates U.N. United Nations Contents 1 Introduction 2 Mapping the Salafi-jihadi Landscape in Libya 9 Drivers of Salafi-jihadi Movements: Push and Pull Factors 14 The Outlook for Salafi-jihadi Movements in Libya 16 Consequences of Salafi-jihadi Persistence 18 Responding to the Persistent Salafi-Jihadi Threat 21 Future Scenarios 23 Conclusions 24 Endnotes Summary alafi-jihadis have maintained an active presence in Libya due to a mix of push and Spull factors. Historic participation in such groups, declining standards of living, the historical marginalization of minorities, and a pervasive sense of victimhood have all made Libya a ripe jihadi recruiting ground.
    [Show full text]
  • Ansar Al-Sharia in Libya (ASL)
    Ansar al-Sharia in Libya (ASL) Name: Ansar al-Sharia in Libya (ASL) Type of Organization: Insurgent non-state actor religious social services provider terrorist violent Ideologies and Affiliations: Islamist jihadist Qutbist Salafist Sunni takfiri Place of Origin: Libya Year of Origin: 2012 Founder(s): Abu Sufyan Bin Qumu (founder of Ansar al-Sharia in Derna); Mohamed al-Zahawi, Nasser al-Tarshani, and other Libyan Islamists (founders of Ansar al-Sharia Benghazi) Places of Operation: Libya Overview Also Known As: Ansar al-Charia in Libya1 Katibat Ansar al-Charia2 Katibat Ansar al-Sharia3 Partisans of Islamic Law in Libya4 Partisans of Sharia in Libya5 Supporters of Islamic Law in Libya6 Supporters of Sharia in Libya7 Executive Summary: Ansar al-Sharia in Libya (ASL) was a violent Salafist group that was active in Libya from 2012 to 2017. The group sought to transform Libya into an Islamic state governed in accordance with sharia (Islamic law). At its height, ASL operated branches in Benghazi, Derna, Sirte, Ajdabiya, and Nawfalia.8 1 Ansar al-Sharia in Libya (ASL) ASL emerged from two smaller groups: the Ansar al-Sharia Brigade in Benghazi (ASB) and Ansar al-Sharia in Derna (ASD). ASB and ASD began operating under the name of “Ansar al-Sharia in Libya” in an effort to rehabilitate their public image after facing domestic and international condemnation for their alleged involvement in the September 2012 attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi.9 ASL denied that it was connected to the consulate attack and, in an effort to rebrand, increased its focus on dawa (Islamic missionary work).
    [Show full text]