State's Opening Brief

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

State's Opening Brief No. 09-1233 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States ___________ GOVERNOR ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., Appellants, v. MARCIANO PLATA AND RALPH COLEMAN, et al., Appellees. ___________ Appeal from the United States District Courts for the Eastern District of California and the Northern District of California ___________ BRIEF OF APPELLANTS ___________ EDMUND G. BROWN JR. CARTER G. PHILLIPS* ATTORNEY GENERAL OF EAMON P. JOYCE CALIFORNIA TARA MIKKILINENI JAMES M. HUMES SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP CHIEF DEPUTY ATTORNEY 1501 K Street, N.W. GENERAL Washington, DC 20005 MANUEL M. MEDEIROS (202) 736-8000 STATE SOLICITOR GENERAL [email protected] GORDON BURNS DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL JERROLD C. SCHAEFER JONATHAN L. WOLFF PAUL B. MELLO ROCHELLE C. EAST S. ANNE JOHNSON SENIOR ASSISTANT SAMANTHA D. WOLFF ATTORNEYS GENERAL RENJU P. JACOB KYLE A. LEWIS HANSON BRIDGETT LLP DANIELLE F. O’BANNON 425 Market Street DEPUTY ATTORNEYS 26th Floor GENERAL San Francisco, CA 94105 455 Golden Gate Avenue (415) 777-3200 Suite 11000 San Francisco, CA 94102-7004 (415) 703-5500 Counsel for Appellants August 27, 2010 *Counsel of Record QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the three-judge district court had jurisdiction to issue a “prisoner release order” pursuant to the Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”), 18 U.S.C. § 3626. 2. Whether the court below properly interpreted and applied Section 3626(a)(3)(E), which requires a three-judge court to find, by clear and convincing evidence, that “crowding is the primary cause of the violation of a Federal right; and … no other relief will remedy the violation of the Federal right” before issuing a “prisoner release order.” 3. Whether the three-judge court’s “prisoner release order,” which was entered to address the allegedly unconstitutional delivery of medical and mental-health care to two classes of California inmates, but mandates a system-wide population cap within two years that will require a population reduction of approximately 46,000 inmates, satisfies the PLRA’s nexus and heightened narrow tailoring requirements while giving sufficient weight to potential adverse effects on public safety and the State’s operation of its criminal justice system. (i) ii PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDING Appellees are the following: Gilbert Aviles Clifford Myelle Steven Bautista Marciano Plata Ralph Coleman Leslie Rhoades Paul Decasas Otis Shaw Raymond Johns Ray Stoderd Joseph Long Intervenor-plaintiff: California Correctional Peace Officers’ Association, Appellants are the following five defendants: Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger Matthew Cate, Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation John Chiang, California State Controller Ana J. Matosantos, Director of the California Department of Finance Stephen W. Mayberg, Director of the Department of Mental Health The following 144 individuals are intervenor-defen- dants: Joel Anderson, Samuel Aanestad, Legislator Legislator Roy Ashburn, Anthony Adams, Legislator Legislator Chief Probation Amador County Officer Kim Sheriff Martin Barrett Ryan iii James F. Battin, Jr.*, City of Fremont Legislator Police Chief Craig Tom Berryhill, Steckler Legislator City of Fresno Police Sam Blakeslee, Chief Jerry Dyer Legislator City of Grover Beach Police Chief Michael Police Chief Jim Billdt Copsey Butte County Chief City of Modesto Probation Officer Police Chief Roy John Wardell Wasden Butte County Sheriff- City of Pasadena Coroner Perry L. Police Chief Barney Reniff Melekian Calaveras County City of Paso Robles Sheriff Dennis Police Chief Lisa Downum Solomon District Attorney City of Roseville Ronald L. Calhoun Police Chief Joel Chief Probation Neves Officer Lionel City of San Chatman Bernardino Police City of Alhambra Chief Michael Billdt Police Chief Jim City of Santa Clara Hudson Police Chief Steve City of Atwater Police Lodge Chief Richard City of Sonora Police Hawthorne Chief Mace City of Delano Chief McIntosh of Corrections City of Vacaville George Galaza Police Chief Rich City of Delano Police Word Chief Mark City of Whittier DeRosia Police Chief Dave Singer iv City of Woodland Bill Emmerson, Police Chief Carey Legislator Sullivan District Attorney District Attorney Bradford Fenocchio Gregg Cohen Fresno County Chief Contra Costa County Probation Officer Chief Probation Linda Penner Officer Lionel Fresno County Chatman Sheriff Margaret Contra Costa County Mims Sheriff Warren Jean Fuller, Rupf Legislator County of San Mateo Glenn County Sheriff County of Santa Larry Jones Barbara National City Police County of Santa Chief Adolfo Clara Gonzales County of Solano Ted Gaines, County of Sonoma Legislator Paul Cook, Legislator Martin Garrick, Dave Cox, Legislator Legislator Police Chief Mark Police Chief Richard DeRosia Hawthorne Chuck DeVore, Sheriff Pat Hedges Legislator Dennis Hollings- Del Norte County worth, Legislator Sheriff Dean Wilson Shirley Horton*, Sutter County Sheriff Legislator Jim Denney Guy S. Houston*, District Attorney Legislator Bonnie M. Dumanis Police Chief Jim Robert Dutton, Hudson Legislator Bob Huff, Legislator Michael D. Duvall, Humboldt County Legislator Sheriff Gary Philip El Dorado County Sheriff Jeff Neves v Inyo County Chief Merced County Probation Officer Sheriff Mark Pazin Jim Moffet Chief Probation Inyo County Sheriff Officer Don Meyer William Lutze Chief Probation District Attorney Officer Jim Moffett Edward R. Jagels Mono County Sheriff Kevin Jeffries, Richard Scholl Legislator Monterey County Sheriff Larry Jones Sheriff Mike Rick Keene*, Kanalakis Legislator San Joaquin County Kern County Sheriff Sheriff Steve Moore Donny Youngblood District Attorney District Attorney Clifford Newell Robert Kochly Roger Niello, Doug La Malfa*, Legislator Legislator Orange County Bill Maze*, Legislator Sheriff Coroner Lake County Sheriff Michael S. Carona Rod Mitchell District Attorney Rod Lassen County Pacheco Sheriff Steve District Attorney Warren David W. Paulson Los Angeles County District Attorney Sheriff Lee Baca Vern Pierson Sheriff William Lutz Placer County Sheriff Abel Maldonado, Edward N. Bonner Legislator District Attorney Mariposa County John R. Poyner Chief Probation District Attorney Officer Gail Neal Tony Rackauckas Sheriff Jim Mele District Attorney Police Chief Barney Michael Ramos Melekian Mendocino County Sheriff Tom Allman vi District Attorney Shasta County Michael Ramsey Sheriff Tom Chief Probation Bosenko Officer Brian District Attorney Richart Gerald T. Shea District Attorney Solano County Chief Todd Riebe Probation Officer Riverside County Isabelle Voit Sheriff Bob G. Solano County Sheriff Doyle Gary R. Stanton George Runner, Jim Silva, Legislator Legislator Cameron Smyth, Sharon Runner*, Legislator Legislator Police Chief Lisa San Benito County Solomon Sheriff Curtis Hill Sonoma County Chief San Diego County Probation Officer Sheriff William B. Robert Ochs Kolender Sonoma County San Mateo County District Attorney Sheriff Greg Munks Stephan Santa Barbara Passalacqua County Chief Sonoma County Probation Officer Sheriff/Coroner Patricia Stewart William Cogbill Santa Barbara Todd Spitzer*, County Sheriff Legislator Bill Brown Stanislaus County Santa Clara County Chief Probation Sheriff Laurie Officer Jerry Smith Powers District Attorney Jan Stanislaus County Scully Sheriff Adam District Attorney Christianson Donald Segerstrom vii Stanislaus County Yolo County Sheriff Sheriff’s Ed Prieto Department Yuba County Sheriff District Attorney Steve Durfor Christie Stanley Bill Berryhill, Chief Probation Legislator Officer Karen Connie Conway, Staples Legislator Audra Strickland, Danny Gilmore, Legislator Legislator District Attorney Curt Hagman, Gregory Totten Legislator Van Tran, Legislator Diane Harkey, Tehema County Legislator Sheriff Clay Parker Steven Knight, Ventura County Legislator Sheriff Bob Brooks Dan Logue, Michael N. Villines, Legislator Legislator Jeff Miller, Mimi Walters, Legislator Legislator Brian Nestande, Police Chief Rich Legislator Word Jim Nielsen, Mark Wyland, Legislator Legislator * No longer in the Legislature TABLE OF CONTENTS Page QUESTIONS PRESENTED ................................. i PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDING ..................... ii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ................................. xi OPINIONS BELOW ............................................. 1 JURISDICTION ................................................... 1 STATUTORY PROVISIONS INVOLVED ........... 2 STATEMENT OF THE CASE.............................. 2 A. Statutory Background ............................. 4 B. Factual Background ................................. 5 SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT ..................... 10 ARGUMENT ......................................................... 13 I. THE THREE-JUDGE COURT LACKED JURISDICTION TO ENTER THE “PRISONER RELEASE ORDER.” ............... 13 A. The Plata Court Erred In Granting Plaintiffs’ Motion To Convene ................. 14 B. The Coleman Court, Too, Erred When It Convened Three-Judge Proceedings ....... 20 C. The Release Order Should Be Reversed For Lack Of Jurisdiction, And The Cases Should Be Remanded To Their Respective District Courts. ...................... 24 II. REVERSAL IS WARRANTED BECAUSE THE COURT’S INTERPRETATION AND APPLICATION OF § 3626(a)(3)(E) IS CONTRARY TO THE PLRA ......................... 26 (ix) x TABLE OF CONTENTS—continued Page A. The Court’s § 3626(a)(3)(E) Holding Should Be Reversed Because It Has No Relation To, And The Court Expressly Refused To Consider, Current Con- ditions ....................................................... 26 B. The Court Erred In Interpreting The PLRA’s “Primary
Recommended publications
  • State of Surveillance in California – Findings & Recommendations January 2015
    State of Surveillance in California – Findings & Recommendations January 2015 Executive Summary In the wake of revelations about the National Security Agency’s rampant warrantless spying and local law enforcement’s use of military equipment in cities like Ferguson, Missouri, community members have been regularly contacting the ACLU with concerns about the proliferation of surveillance. Cities and counties have also increasingly reached out for guidance about how to approach the use of surveillance in ways consistent with civil liberties and civil rights. Yet very little information exists about surveillance technology in California or how to properly consider its acquisition or use. To address this, the ACLU of California conducted a first-of-its-kind assessment of surveillance technology in the state. We also released a new resource guide, Making Smart Decisions About Surveillance: A Guide for Communities, and developed a model ordinance designed to help policymakers ensure adequate transparency, oversight, and accountability.1 The following document summarizes our findings about the state of surveillance in California and recommends several ways that the Attorney General and other state policymakers could take action to help address the widespread lack of transparency, oversight, and accountability for surveillance technology in California. Methodology and Summary of Surveillance Survey Findings From June to November 2014, the ACLU of California2 examined thousands of publicly available3 records for California’s 58 counties and 60 selected cities.4 We researched the types of surveillance technology in communities, including automated license plate readers (ALPRs), 5 body cameras,6 drones,7 facial recognition,8 “Stingrays,” 9 and video surveillance.10 We investigated how much money has been spent to acquire and maintain surveillance technology and the source of those funds.
    [Show full text]
  • April 8, 2021 the Honorable Toni Atkins the Honorable Anthony
    April 8, 2021 The Honorable Toni Atkins The Honorable Anthony Rendon Senate Pro Tempore Assembly Speaker State Capitol State Capitol Sacramento, CA 95814 Sacramento, CA 95814 The Honorable Nancy Skinner The Honorable Phil Ting Chair, Senate Budget Committee Chair, Assembly Budget Committee State Capitol State Capitol Sacramento, CA 95814 Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear President Pro Tempore Atkins, Speaker Rendon and Budget Chairs Skinner and Ting, We appreciate your willingness to meet with us, and to continue your partnership with the mayors of our largest cities in finding pragmatic solutions to address our state’s homelessness crisis. Given the scale of the challenge we collectively face, and because of the extraordinary opportunity created by two unique circumstances--the passage of the American Rescue Plan and the state’s budget surplus--we write to revisit our prior budget request. As you know, we have long believed that the state must identify an ongoing, consistent allocation of flexible funding sufficient to meet the enormity of the challenge in our cities for affordable housing construction and supportive services. While our economic challenges make it difficult to identify an ongoing revenue source, the large amount of one-time funding presents a generational opportunity to make a dramatic move to address our homelessness crisis. That can be accomplished by setting aside a one-time allocation of $16 billion for a steady expenditure of $4 billion per year over the next four years. Through our partnership, we’ve accomplished much in our cities in recent years through such initiatives as Project Homekey, HHAP, and HEAP. We created permanent or transitional housing for our homeless at an average cost to the state of $148,000 per unit under Project Homekey, for instance, and we built prefabricated dorms, modular housing, tiny homes, and shelters even more cost-effectively with state and local dollars.
    [Show full text]
  • January 19, 2021 the Honorable Nancy Pelosi the Honorable Mitch
    January 19, 2021 The Honorable Nancy Pelosi The Honorable Mitch McConnell Speaker Majority Leader United States House of Representatives United States Senate Washington, DC 20510 Washington, DC 20510 The Honorable Kevin McCarthy The Honorable Charles E. Schumer Republican Leader Democratic Leader United States House of Representatives United States Senate Washington, DC 20510 Washington, DC 20510 Dear Speaker Pelosi, Leader McCarthy, Leader McConnell and Leader Schumer: RE: Urgent Action Needed on President-Elect Biden’s American Rescue Plan On behalf of The United States Conference of Mayors, we urge you to take immediate action on comprehensive coronavirus relief legislation, including providing direct fiscal assistance to all cities, which is long overdue. President-elect Biden’s American Rescue Plan contains such assistance as part of an aggressive strategy to contain the virus, increase access to life-saving vaccines, and create a foundation for sustainable and inclusive recovery. American cities and our essential workers have been serving at the frontlines of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic for nearly a year. We have been charged with executing herculean public health efforts and an unprecedented emergency response. Despite immense fiscal pressure, your local government partners oversaw those efforts, while trying to maintain essential services and increase our internal capacity to provide support for residents and businesses who have been crippled by a tanking economy. And yet, as the economic engines of our country, local governments will be relied upon to lead the long- term economic recovery our nation so desperately needs, even as, with few exceptions, cities have been largely left without direct federal assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Zachary Redmond Shaun Schaefer Dana Liberty County Counsel Community Services Div
    Zachary Redmond Shaun Schaefer Dana Liberty County Counsel Community Services Div. Mgr. Community Services FUN Coordinator County of Fresno City of Fresno, Mosqueda Community Ctr. City of Fresno, Mosqueda Community Ctr. 2220 Tulare St., 5th Fl. 4670 E. Butler 4670 E. Butler Fresno, CA 93721 Fresno, CA 93702 Fresno, CA 93702 Mikal Kirchner Wendi Howard Director of Resources & Community Srvcs. Recreation Supervisor City of Selma Coalinga-Huron Recreation & Parks District 1710 Tucker St P.O. Box 386 Selma, CA 93662 Coalinga, CA 93210 Patricia Bower Emma Lozito OASIS Program Manager Howard Brushwood Bella Vida Group Home Valley Caregiver Resource Center 1710 Athens Avenue 5284 N. Vernal Ave. 3845 N. Clark St., Ste. 201 Clovis, CA 93611 Fresno, CA 93722 Fresno, CA 93726-4812 Mary Ambriz Phoebe Sarah Seaton Burt Abarbanell Coordinator Program Director 1129 W. Fremont Ave. Del Rey Senior Center Calif. Rural Legal Assistance Fresno, CA 93711 PO Box 564 2115 Kern St., Suite 370 Del Rey, CA 93616 Fresno, CA 93721 Phillip Gallegos Administrator Delno Terrace Elderly Housing Community Services Director Glen Agnes/Delno Terrace 1480 N. Delno City of Kerman 530 W. Floradora Fresno, CA 93728 720 S. 8th St. Fresno, CA 93728 Kerman, CA 93630 Hilda Lozano Raquel Scott Rick Garcia Senior Citizen Coordinator Coordinator Parlier Senior Services Kingsburg Senior Center Orange Cove Sr. Ctr. 1100 E. Parlier Ave. 1450 Ellis St. 699 6th St. Parlier, CA 93648 Kingsburg, CA 93631 Orange Cove, CA 93646 Joel Glick Carol Martens Leonard Kelley Community Services Director Senior Services Director Director City of Reedley Reedley Senior Center San Joaquin Gardens 100 N.
    [Show full text]
  • Voter Information Guide for 2008, General Election
    University of California, Hastings College of the Law UC Hastings Scholarship Repository Propositions California Ballot Propositions and Initiatives 2008 Voter Information Guide for 2008, General Election Follow this and additional works at: http://repository.uchastings.edu/ca_ballot_props Recommended Citation Voter Information Guide for 2008, General Election (2008). http://repository.uchastings.edu/ca_ballot_props/1266 This Proposition is brought to you for free and open access by the California Ballot Propositions and Initiatives at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Propositions by an authorized administrator of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CALIFORNIA ELECTION TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 2008 OFFICIAL VOTER INFORMATION GUIDE I, Debra Bowen, Secretary of State of the State of California, do hereby certify that the measures included herein will be submitted to the electors of the State of California at the General Election to be held throughout the State on November 4, 2008, and that this guide has been correctly prepared in accordance with the law. Witness my hand and the Great Seal of the State in Sacramento, California, on this 11th day of August, 2008. Debra Bowen Secretary of State Dear Fellow Voter: By registering to vote, you have taken the fi rst step in playing an active role in deciding California’s future. Now, to help you make your decisions, my offi ce has created this Offi cial Voter Information Guide that contains titles and summaries prepared by Attorney General Edmund G. Brown Jr., impartial analyses of the law and potential costs to taxpayers prepared by Legislative Analyst Elizabeth G.
    [Show full text]
  • Dyer's Winning Reaction: Tears and Prayer »
    DYER’S WINNING REACTION: TEARS AND PRAYER » NEWSOM: NO LARGE GATHERINGS DUE TO CORONAVIRUS » TRAVEL BANS, MARKET CHAOS: WEEKLY DIGEST REACTION TO VIRUS SPREAD » MARCH 13, 2020 MAYOR-ELECT DYER’S WINNING REACTION: TEARS AND PRAYER MarchLOCAL 11, 2020 | David Taub Jerry Dyer said he was humbled upon learning Dyer Will Have Say in New Police Chief Wednesday that he clinched the Fresno mayoral Dyer said he is in discussions with current Mayor Lee race. “When I found out the news today, I was in Brand to select a new police chief. “I fully anticipate tears. The first thing I did do was fall on my knees he’s going to initiate that process here in the next and thank God for al- month or so. I will be part of that process. He’s asked “When I found out the news lowing me to become me to be part of that process,” Dyer said. Andy Hall today, I was in tears. The mayor of this city,” succeeded Dyer as chief last October. However, Hall first thing I did do was fall Dyer told the media at faces a mandatory retirement in the spring of 2021. on my knees and thank God for allowing me to be- a news conference at “I don’t think there is any police chief candidate in come mayor of this city.” City Hall. After the lat- the country, let alone internally, who would take that — Mayor-Elect Jerry Dyer est round of election position unless the incoming mayor is part of that results was released decision-making process,” Dyer said.
    [Show full text]
  • Look for More Military Jets Overhead in March As Base Welcomes F-16S » Gov
    WEEKLY DIGEST FEBRUARY 7, 2020 LOOK FOR MORE MILITARY JETS OVERHEAD IN MARCH AS BASE WELCOMES F-16S » GOV. NEWSOM PROPOSES NEW PLAN FOR MANAGING WATER » BLOOMBERG SAYS HE’S READY TO BOUNCE ‘BULLY’ TRUMP » LOOK FOR MORE MILITARY JETS OVERHEAD IN MARCH AS BASE WELCOMES F-16S FebruaryLOCAL 6, 2020 | Randy Reed A squadron of Air Force F-16s will streak across introduce new training elements that base officials local skies for two weeks in March. It’s part of a want to emphasize with a more innovative name. unique joint exercise with Fresno’s 144th Fighter “For instance, in Arizona, there’s an (F-16) Viper Wing. And officials from the California Air Nation- squadron. They do ‘Haboob Havoc,’” Bautista said. A al Guard base are looking for the public’s help to “haboob” is a powerful wind storm that kicks up tre- come up with a new name for the multi-unit train- mendous dust clouds across the desert. ing event. Pilots from Holloman Air Force Base in New Mexico will fly Related Story: NAS Lemoore Pilots Will Make Historic “The second and probably our larger mission that we alongside local F-15 Super Bowl Flyover more train to every day is Eagle pilots, taking our air superiority world- off and landing at the “For a short amount of time, they do this exercise wide mission.” — Capt. Fresno base each day. that is also really attractive and they offer great train- Skylar Bautista Aircraft from Naval ing.” Bautista said Fresno needs an equally memo- Air Station Lemoore may also participate in the rable name with a local flavor.
    [Show full text]
  • July 13, 2021 the Honorable Charles E. Schumer the Honorable Nancy
    July 13, 2021 The Honorable Charles E. Schumer The Honorable Nancy Pelosi Majority Leader Speaker United States Senate United States House oF Representatives The Honorable Mitch McConnell The Honorable Kevin McCarthy Republican Leader Republican Leader United States Senate United States House oF Representatives Dear Leader Schumer, Speaker Pelosi, Leader McConnell, and Leader McCarthy: RE: Mayoral Support for the Bipartisan Infrastructure Framework On behalF oF The United States ConFerence oF Mayors, we urge you to take immediate action on the Bipartisan Infrastructure Framework announced by President Biden and a group oF Republican and Democratic Senators on June 24 in the spirit oF both progress and compromise. This Framework would be the largest long-term investment in our nation’s infrastructure and competitiveness in nearly a century – $1.2 trillion over eight years – to help make our economy more sustainable, resilient, and just. The Bipartisan InFrastructure Framework is crucial to making meaningFul progress on one oF the most pressing and unifying challenges Facing our country – the need for comprehensive investment in public transportation; roads; bridges; passenger and Freight rail; drinking water and wastewater; clean energy and electriFication; legacy pollution cleanup; cyber-attack and eXtreme weather-resiliency; and universal broadband access. Thus, we believe that this Framework deserves bipartisan support in the United States Senate and the United States House oF Representatives. As was the case with the historic American Rescue Plan – where Democrat, Republican and independent mayors came together through The United States ConFerence oF Mayors to help secure $350 billion in direct relieF For state and local governments – we know that details oF the Bipartisan InFrastructure Framework will need to be developed by the leadership and relevant committees in Congress.
    [Show full text]
  • Jurisdictional Statement ______
    No. 09- IN THE Supreme Court of the United States ___________ GOVERNOR ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., Appellants, v. MARCIANO PLATA AND RALPH COLEMAN, et al., Appellees. ___________ Appeal from the United States District Courts for the Eastern District of California and the Northern District of California ___________ JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT ___________ EDMUND G. BROWN JR. CARTER G. PHILLIPS* ATTORNEY GENERAL OF EAMON P. JOYCE CALIFORNIA SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP JAMES M. HUMES 1501 K Street, N.W. CHIEF DEPUTY ATTORNEY Washington, DC 20005 GENERAL (202) 736-8000 MANUEL M. MEDEIROS [email protected] STATE SOLICITOR GENERAL GORDON BURNS JERROLD C. SCHAEFER DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL PAUL B. MELLO JONATHAN L. WOLFF S. ANNE JOHNSON ROCHELLE C. EAST SAMANTHA D. WOLFF SENIOR ASSISTANT RENJU P. JACOB ATTORNEYS GENERAL HANSON BRIDGETT LLP KYLE A. LEWIS 425 Market Street DANIELLE F. O’BANNON 26th Floor DEPUTY ATTORNEYS San Francisco, CA 94105 GENERAL (415) 777-3200 455 Golden Gate Avenue Suite 11000 San Francisco, CA 94102-7004 (415) 703-5500 Counsel for Appellants April 12, 2010 *Counsel of Record QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the three-judge district court had juris- diction to issue a “prisoner release order” pursuant to the Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”), 18 U.S.C. § 3626. 2. Whether the court below properly interpreted and applied Section 3626(a)(3)(E), which requires a three-judge court to find, by clear and convincing evidence, that “crowding is the primary cause of the violation of a Federal right; and … no other relief will remedy the violation of the Federal right” in order to issue a “prisoner release order.” 3.
    [Show full text]
  • California Roster 2004 KEVIN SHELLEY Compiled by Secretary of State
    California Roster 2004 Compiled by Secretary of State KEVIN SHELLEY Fall 2004 Dear Friend, It is my pleasure to make available to you the 2004 edition of the California Roster. The California Roster provides a comprehensive collection of a wide range of government official contact information. The California Roster can assist you in obtaining important information on your state and local officials, Congressional Representatives, state agencies, and other government officials across the nation. For your convenience, the California Roster is also available on the Secretary of State’s website at: www.ss.ca.gov. Sincerely, KEVIN SHELLEY Secretary of State TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1 – California State Government 2 CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS 4 HISTORY of CALIFORNIA STATE OFFICEHOLDERS 8 THE GOLDEN STATE AND STATE EMBLEMS 12 CALIFORNIA STATE SENATE 14 CALIFORNIA STATE ASSEMBLY 18 CALIFORNIA JUDICIAL BRANCH 24 CALIFORNIA STATE AGENCIES, DEPARTMENTS, BOARDS, AND COMMISSIONS 28 Section 2 – California Local Government 50 COUNTY OFFICIALS 52 CITY AND TOWN OFFICIALS (INCORPORATED) 76 UNINCORPORATED AREAS 166 Section 3 – California US Government 174 UNITED STATES SENATE 176 UNITED STATES HOUSE of REPRESENTATIVES 176 Section 4 – Roster of the United States 180 STATE OFFICIALS 182 SECTION 1 – CALIFORNIA STATE GOVERNMENT CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS History Of California State Officeholders The Golden State and State Emblems LEGISLATURE California State Senate California State Assembly CALIFORNIA JUDICIAL BRANCH CALIFORNIA STATE AGENCIES, DEPARTMENTS, BOARDS, AND COMMISSIONS CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS There are eight statewide Constitutional Officers: the Governor, Lieutenant Governor, Secretary of State, Attorney General, State Controller, State Treasurer, Insurance Commissioner and the State Superintendent of Public Instruction. These officers are all elected at the same time in a General Election and may be re-elected to a maximum of 2 four-year terms.
    [Show full text]
  • A Supplement Of
    2019 A SUPPLEMENT OF BANK OF AMERICA AD welcome the 8future x 10 When you work with a bank that knows you and how businesses like yoursvertical are evolving, you have the power to stay ahead of changes. Growing confidently towards a stronger business, community and future. What would you like the power to do?® To learn more, call Mark Riley at 559.261.8626 or email [email protected] bofaml.com “ Bank of America Merrill Lynch” is the marketing name for the global banking and global markets businesses of Bank of America Corporation, including Bank of America, N.A., Member FDIC. ©2019 Bank of America Corporation. GCB-156-AD ARSC6PLG Publisher’s LETTER Welcome The Business Journal is excited to host its second annual Power Breakfast event – 60 Ideas in 60 Minutes. Six leaders from the Central Valley’s most successful companies will share 10 of their organization’s internal programs, philosophies and initiatives – both big and small – that can be applied to any business. We’ve compiled their ideas in this publication so you can learn from proven strategies for improving employee engagement, developing ideas, being an eective leader and driving innovation. We are confident their ideas will not only be inspirational, but also serve as a spark for new ideas that you can utilize to grow your business. A huge thank you to our Presenting Sponsor, Bank of America, and also to our two Partner Sponsors, Fresno Equipment Company and Central Valley Community Bank. Lastly, we want to thank our six outstanding speakers for making our sold-out event a success.
    [Show full text]
  • Post 9-11 Policing Project
    PPOOSSTT 99--1111 PPOOLLIICCIINNGG THE CRIME CONTROL – HOMELAND SECURITY PARADIGM TAKING COMMAND OF NEW REALITIES September 2005 This document was prepared by the International Association of Chiefs of Police, under cooperative agreement number 2003-DD-BX-K002, awarded by the Bureau of Justice Assistance, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. The opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................i I. The Changing State of Policing.................................................................................. 1 The Post 9-11 Policing Project....................................................................................... 1 Project Approach ............................................................................................................ 2 The Search for Promising Practices.............................................................................. 4 Taking Command........................................................................................................... 5 Selecting Promising Practice Priorities........................................................................ 5 II. Post 9-11 Policing: The Crime Control – Homeland Security Paradigm.......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]