January 19, 2021 the Honorable Nancy Pelosi the Honorable Mitch
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
State of Surveillance in California – Findings & Recommendations January 2015
State of Surveillance in California – Findings & Recommendations January 2015 Executive Summary In the wake of revelations about the National Security Agency’s rampant warrantless spying and local law enforcement’s use of military equipment in cities like Ferguson, Missouri, community members have been regularly contacting the ACLU with concerns about the proliferation of surveillance. Cities and counties have also increasingly reached out for guidance about how to approach the use of surveillance in ways consistent with civil liberties and civil rights. Yet very little information exists about surveillance technology in California or how to properly consider its acquisition or use. To address this, the ACLU of California conducted a first-of-its-kind assessment of surveillance technology in the state. We also released a new resource guide, Making Smart Decisions About Surveillance: A Guide for Communities, and developed a model ordinance designed to help policymakers ensure adequate transparency, oversight, and accountability.1 The following document summarizes our findings about the state of surveillance in California and recommends several ways that the Attorney General and other state policymakers could take action to help address the widespread lack of transparency, oversight, and accountability for surveillance technology in California. Methodology and Summary of Surveillance Survey Findings From June to November 2014, the ACLU of California2 examined thousands of publicly available3 records for California’s 58 counties and 60 selected cities.4 We researched the types of surveillance technology in communities, including automated license plate readers (ALPRs), 5 body cameras,6 drones,7 facial recognition,8 “Stingrays,” 9 and video surveillance.10 We investigated how much money has been spent to acquire and maintain surveillance technology and the source of those funds. -
May 12, 2020 the Honorable Mitch Mcconnell Majority Leader United
May 12, 2020 The Honorable Mitch McConnell The Honorable Charles Schumer Majority Leader Minority Leader United States Senate United States Senate Washington, D.C. 20510 Washington, D.C. 20510 The Honorable Nancy Pelosi The Honorable Kevin McCarthy Speaker of the House House Minority Leader U.S. House of Representatives U.S. House of Representatives Washington, D.C. 20515 Washington, D.C. 20515 RE: Temporarily Expand SNAP in the Next Federal COVID-19 Relief Package to Lift Up Vulnerable Families and Support Local Economies Dear Speaker Pelosi and Leaders McConnell, Schumer, and McCarthy: We, the undersigned mayors representing cities across the nation, appreciate your work on the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA) and Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act to help workers, employers, older Americans, and children, but much more needs to be done to ensure that our residents can weather this crisis. During this time of soaring unemployment, financial insecurity, and growing hunger, we urge Congress to temporarily increase SNAP benefit levels in the next federal COVID-19 relief package. America’s cities are on the front line of responding to unprecedented disruption to local economies triggered by COVID-19. As mayors, we need every option available to fight hunger and stimulate the economy in our cities. SNAP is a proven solution to both challenges. By providing families with a grocery benefit they can use to purchase food directly, SNAP is a safe, effective way to ensure that low-income children and their families can get the food they need during this unprecedented crisis. While the FFCRA provided USDA with authority to increase emergency SNAP allotments for existing SNAP households to the maximum benefit, the most vulnerable families—roughly 12 million people, including 5 million children—received no additional nutrition assistance because their household already received the maximum SNAP benefit. -
A City Could Wipe Away 55,000 Old Warrants 1
A City Could Wipe Away 55,000 Old Warrants - Route Fifty Page 1 of 7 SPONSOR CONTENTSEARCH SPONSOR CONTENT Connecting state and local government leaders In The One State That A City Could Wipe A State Braces For In Most States, Child Vegas Sets The Stage Optimizing The Tested The Census, Away 55,000 Old Major Transportation Marriage Is Legal. For Smart City Success Caseworker Concerns About Warrants Funding Cuts As Ballot Some Legislators Are Reaching Hard-To- Measure Nears Trying To Change That Count Residents Passage A City Could Wipe Away 55,000 Old Warrants The New Orleans City Council last month passed a resolution calling for the dismissal of over 55,000 outstanding municipal and traffic warrants, along with their associated fines and fees. The oldest are two decades old. SHUTTERSTOCK By Emma Coleman | NOVEMBER 11, 2019 03:50 PM ET More than 44,000 people in New Orleans have warrants for traffic Most Popular violations and what advocates call “crimes of poverty.” City leaders The New First Responder Crisis: say the system needs to be overhauled. 1 Not Enough Dispatchers FINES AND FEES CRIMINAL JUSTICE NEW ORLEANS In the One State that Tested the 2 Census, Concerns About Reaching Hard-to-Count Residents In Most States, Child Marriage is One in seven adults in New Orleans have a warrant out for their arrest for 3 Legal. Some Legislators Are Trying to Change That a traffic or municipal violation. In many cases, the warrants are for unpaid traffic fines or minor offenses like public drunkenness or disturbing the peace. -
The 87Th Annual Meeting of the United States Conference of Mayors
The 87th Annual Meeting of The United States Conference of Mayors INFRASTRUCTURE INNOVATION INCLUSION June 28 - July 1, 2019 Honolulu, HI Hilton Hawaiian Village AGENDA Updated June 25, 2019 (6:30am GMT) Welcome To the 87th Annual Meeting of The United States Conference of Mayors June 28 - July 1, 2019 Hilton Hawaiian Village Honolulu, HI Key Information for Attendees 2 Floor Plans 5 Host City Ground Transportation 8 DAILY SCHEDULE Thursday, June 27 9 Friday, June 28 9 Saturday, June 29 22 Sunday, June 30 34 Monday, July 1 46 Workforce Development Council (WDC) 52 Exhibitors 54 Host City Sponsors 53 The USCM Presidents 56 The USCM Leadership 58 Infrastructure Innovation Title Sponsor Inclusion 1 Key Information for Attendees Participation Unless otherwise noted, all plenary sessions, committee meetings, council meetings, best practice forums, and social events are open to all mayors and other officially-registered attendees. Mayors Only Registration A Mayors Only Registration - including Badge and Room Key Pickup - will be located in the Rainbow Tower on Wednesday, June 26, Thursday, June 27, and Friday, June 28. Host City mayoral transportation will take mayors directly to the Rainbow Tower. Mayors arriving on June 26-28 should go directly to the Mayors Only Registration desk in the Rainbow Tower to pick up credentials and room keys. Registration/Host City Hospitality The Conference Registration Desk and Host City Hospitality are located in the Mid-Pacific Conference Center, on the 6th floor in the Coral Lounge. The Registration Desk hours are: ● Thursday, June 27: 2:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. -
To Shrink Classes Amid COVID-19, Israel Needs to Hire 15000 Teachers. It Won't Be Easy. College Students
Washtenaw Jewish News Presort Standard In this issue… c/o Jewish Federation of Greater Ann Arbor U.S. Postage PAID 2939 Birch Hollow Drive Ann Arbor, MI Phoenix's High Adin Ann Arbor, MI 48108 Permit No. 85 Jewish Holidays Steinsaltz Mayor Dies page 4 pages 12 to 20 pages 21 September 2020 Elul 5780/Tishrei 5781 Volume XX Number 1 FREE College students start (or not) fall semester Patti Smith, special to the WJN on time and graduate, so I (don’t) want to conditions improve at some point during the decision,” she says. “At the end of the day I ormally at this time of year, col- take time off . and I’m enjoying seeing my semester. Lewis decided to stay home in Ann decided to prioritize money and my health. I lege students are getting ready to friends who are here, even if it’s outside at a Arbor for the fall semester, which means she am not expecting to have a particularly excit- N pack their cars and return to their distance.” has to withdraw from Berkeley and then re- ing fall, but I will dedicate my time to various campuses for another semester of classes, Sarah Lewis, 19, is an incoming sopho- apply in the spring. “I made the decision to campaigns leading up to the general election sports, and friends. But this year is anything more at University of California, Berkeley. stay home this fall semester because travel- in November, as well as continuing with my but normal. internship on candidate Gretchen Driskell’s COVID-19 has thrown a wrench into the campaign for Congress. -
April 8, 2021 the Honorable Toni Atkins the Honorable Anthony
April 8, 2021 The Honorable Toni Atkins The Honorable Anthony Rendon Senate Pro Tempore Assembly Speaker State Capitol State Capitol Sacramento, CA 95814 Sacramento, CA 95814 The Honorable Nancy Skinner The Honorable Phil Ting Chair, Senate Budget Committee Chair, Assembly Budget Committee State Capitol State Capitol Sacramento, CA 95814 Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear President Pro Tempore Atkins, Speaker Rendon and Budget Chairs Skinner and Ting, We appreciate your willingness to meet with us, and to continue your partnership with the mayors of our largest cities in finding pragmatic solutions to address our state’s homelessness crisis. Given the scale of the challenge we collectively face, and because of the extraordinary opportunity created by two unique circumstances--the passage of the American Rescue Plan and the state’s budget surplus--we write to revisit our prior budget request. As you know, we have long believed that the state must identify an ongoing, consistent allocation of flexible funding sufficient to meet the enormity of the challenge in our cities for affordable housing construction and supportive services. While our economic challenges make it difficult to identify an ongoing revenue source, the large amount of one-time funding presents a generational opportunity to make a dramatic move to address our homelessness crisis. That can be accomplished by setting aside a one-time allocation of $16 billion for a steady expenditure of $4 billion per year over the next four years. Through our partnership, we’ve accomplished much in our cities in recent years through such initiatives as Project Homekey, HHAP, and HEAP. We created permanent or transitional housing for our homeless at an average cost to the state of $148,000 per unit under Project Homekey, for instance, and we built prefabricated dorms, modular housing, tiny homes, and shelters even more cost-effectively with state and local dollars. -
Local Governments and Mayors As Amici Curiae in Support of the Employees ______Michael N
Nos. 17-1618, 17-1623, 18-107 In the Supreme Court of the United States __________________ GERALD LYNN BOSTOCK, Petitioner, v. CLAYTON COUNTY, GEORGIA, Respondent. __________________ ALTITUDE EXPRESS, INC., et al., Petitioners, v. MELISSA ZARDA, et al., Respondents. __________________ R.G. & G.R. HARRIS FUNERAL HOMES, INC., Petitioners, v. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Respondent, and AIMEE STEPHENS, Respondent- Intervenor. __________________ On Writs of Certiorari to the United States Courts of Appeals for the Eleventh, Second, and Sixth Circuits __________________ BRIEF OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS AND MAYORS AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF THE EMPLOYEES __________________ MICHAEL N. FEUER ZACHARY W. CARTER City Attorney Corporation Counsel JAMES P. CLARK RICHARD DEARING KATHLEEN KENEALY DEVIN SLACK BLITHE SMITH BOCK LORENZO DI SILVIO MICHAEL WALSH DANIEL MATZA-BROWN DANIELLE L. GOLDSTEIN NEW YORK CITY Counsel of Record LAW DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF THE LOS 100 Church Street ANGELES CITY ATTORNEY New York, NY 10007 200 N. Main Street, 7th Fl. Los Angeles, CA 90012 Counsel for Amici Curiae (213) 978-8100 [email protected] i TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES . ii INTEREST OF AMICI CURIAE AND SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT . 1 ARGUMENT . 2 I. Local Experience Shows That Prohibiting All Forms of Sex-Based Discrimination Benefits the Entire Community. 2 A. Non-discrimination laws and policies enhance amici’s operations. 3 B. Communities nationwide have benefitted from such anti-discrimination protections. 5 II. Workplace Discrimination—Including Sex Discrimination Against Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender People—Harms Local Governments. 7 CONCLUSION. 12 APPENDIX List of Amici . App. 1 ii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES PAGE CASES Adams v. -
San Fernando Valley Business Journal the Valley 200 July 20, 2020 Table of Contents
THE VALLEY 200THE MOST INFLUENTIAL LEADERS IN THE VALLEY AREA 2020 017_sfvbj_V200_Section Cover.indd 17 7/14/20 1:48 PM 18 SAN FERNANDO VALLEY BUSINESS JOURNAL THE VALLEY 200 JULY 20, 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS 20 INDEX 38 FINANCE 22 LETTER FROM THE 43 GOVERNMENT EDITOR & PUBLISHER 47 HEALTH CARE 24 ADVISORS 30 BUSINESS 51 ORGANIZATIONS 36 EDUCATION 54 REAL ESTATE We congratulate all the leaders in the Valley 200. Thanks to them, our economy is stronger and our community is better! 018_sfvbj_V200_TOC.indd 18 7/14/20 1:49 PM JULY 20, 2020 SAN FERNANDO VALLEY BUSINESS JOURNAL 19 MEET THE COMPANY THAT’S BEEN IMPROVING BOTTOM LINES SINCE 1991 We bring a new approach to business and personal insurance. One that makes sure you’re not simply protected against liability, but sheltered from risk in the first place. We put decades of experience and know-how to work in helping you avoid expensive claims before they start and then mitigating claims when they do occur. 800-578-8802 POMSASSOC.COM 009-57_sfvbj_fullpages20200720.indd 19 7/13/20 5:13 PM 20 SAN FERNANDO VALLEY BUSINESS JOURNAL THE VALLEY 200 JULY 20, 2020 INDEX PEOPLE K Shafferty, John . 29. Commerce Department . 51 N Kahn, Dan . .28 Shapiro, David . 46 Community Foundation of the Valleys 52. Northeast Valley Health Corp . 50 A Kasendorf, Alexander . 28 Sherman, Brad . 46 Compass Charter Schools . .36 O Adam, Al . .43 Katz, Richard . 28 Simpson, Danone . 42 ConsejoSano . .47 Oschin Partners . 29 Adelstein, Wayne . 24 Khorsand, Vahid . 40 Skeeter, Jane . 35 Cooper Communications Inc . -
The Honorable Nancy Pelosi the Honorable Mitch Mcconnell Speaker Majority Leader United States House of Representatives United
The Honorable Nancy Pelosi The Honorable Mitch McConnell Speaker Majority Leader United States House of Representatives United States Senate 1236 Longworth House Office Building 317 Russell Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20515 Washington, DC 20510 The Honorable Kevin McCarthy The Honorable Chuck Schumer Minority Leader Minority Leader United States House of Representatives United States Senate 2468 Rayburn House Office Building 322 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20515 Washington, DC 20510 Dear Speaker Pelosi, Majority Leader McConnell, Leader McCarthy and Leader Schumer: We write to express our deep concern and objection to the use of federal forces in U.S. cities. These forces are conducting crowd control on city streets and detaining individuals. Their threats and actions have as escalated events, and increased the risk of violence against both civilians and local law enforcement officers. These actions also jeopardize the many important ways federal and local law enforcement must work together to protect our cities and country. We urge you to immediately investigate the President and his administration’s actions. The unilateral deployment of these forces into American cities is unprecedented and violates fundamental constitutional protections and tenets of federalism. As you are well aware, President Trump threatened to deploy federal forces in Seattle to “clear out” a protest area and in Chicago to “clean up” the city. Seattle and Chicago authorities objected and threatened legal action to stop such actions. In Washington, DC outside Lafayette Park, extreme action was taken by federal law enforcement against protesters without the Mayor of DC’s approval. Now the administration has deployed federal forces to Portland despite the objections of local and state officials. -
State's Opening Brief
No. 09-1233 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States ___________ GOVERNOR ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., Appellants, v. MARCIANO PLATA AND RALPH COLEMAN, et al., Appellees. ___________ Appeal from the United States District Courts for the Eastern District of California and the Northern District of California ___________ BRIEF OF APPELLANTS ___________ EDMUND G. BROWN JR. CARTER G. PHILLIPS* ATTORNEY GENERAL OF EAMON P. JOYCE CALIFORNIA TARA MIKKILINENI JAMES M. HUMES SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP CHIEF DEPUTY ATTORNEY 1501 K Street, N.W. GENERAL Washington, DC 20005 MANUEL M. MEDEIROS (202) 736-8000 STATE SOLICITOR GENERAL [email protected] GORDON BURNS DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL JERROLD C. SCHAEFER JONATHAN L. WOLFF PAUL B. MELLO ROCHELLE C. EAST S. ANNE JOHNSON SENIOR ASSISTANT SAMANTHA D. WOLFF ATTORNEYS GENERAL RENJU P. JACOB KYLE A. LEWIS HANSON BRIDGETT LLP DANIELLE F. O’BANNON 425 Market Street DEPUTY ATTORNEYS 26th Floor GENERAL San Francisco, CA 94105 455 Golden Gate Avenue (415) 777-3200 Suite 11000 San Francisco, CA 94102-7004 (415) 703-5500 Counsel for Appellants August 27, 2010 *Counsel of Record QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the three-judge district court had jurisdiction to issue a “prisoner release order” pursuant to the Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”), 18 U.S.C. § 3626. 2. Whether the court below properly interpreted and applied Section 3626(a)(3)(E), which requires a three-judge court to find, by clear and convincing evidence, that “crowding is the primary cause of the violation of a Federal right; and … no other relief will remedy the violation of the Federal right” before issuing a “prisoner release order.” 3. -
2019-Conv-Rick-Jacobs-Accelerator
1 Transit & Infrastructure What We provide expertise and strategic grants to help local governments fund transit & infrastructure to create community wealth. The Model Measure M received a 71% vote to generate $120 billion to build a complete transit system and create 787,000 middle-class careers in Los Angeles County. This measure passed under the leadership of Mayor Garcetti and Rick Jacobs. 2018 Cycle: $14 Billion Generated 2020 Cycle: $150 Billion Targeted 2 Economic Development What Through bipartisan action, the Opportunity Zone incentive was included in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. The incentive could drive $100 billion into underserved communities. We seek to level the playing field between the public and private sectors to steer capital toward investments that create community wealth. The Model We create tools that every community can use. Our Opportunity Zone Investment Prospectus Toolkit is part marketing strategy, part economic development analysis, and part investment memorandum. Technical Assistance We provide training, best practices, & financing charrettes – whatever it takes – to move from prospectus to truly inclusive investment, to build wealth in communities where there has been none. 3 Complete: 43 Investment Prospectuses Mesa AZ Lansing (metro) MI Acadiana LA Los Angeles CA Advantage Valley WV Louisville KY Jefferson Parish LA Madison WI Lafayette LA Marina CA Macon GA Newark NJ St. Louis MO Norfolk (City) VA Albany NY Norfolk (St. Paul's) VA Montrose CO Oakland CA Atlanta (city) GA Oklahoma City OK Atlanta (metro) GA Ontario CA Azusa CA Pittsburg KS Baltimore MD Redding CA Birmingham AL Riverside CA Cleveland OH San Bernardino CA Columbia SC San Jose CA Columbus OH South Bend IN Dayton OH Stockton CA Erie PA Tacoma WA Houston TX Vancouver WA Kansas City MO Waterloo IA Lancaster CA 4 Advisory Council STEVE BENJAMIN ANGELA GLOVER JAMES T. -
Where Residents, Politics, and Government Meet
November 2018 Where Residents, Politics, and Government Meet Philadelphia’s Experiments with Civic Engagement Chayenne Polimédio, Elena Souris, & Hollie Russon-Gilman Last edited on November 14, 2018 at 6:51 p.m. EST Acknowledgments We would like to thank Mark Schmitt, Rachel Black, Cecilia Munoz, Tara McGuinness, Sabrina Detlef, Jon Sotsky, Patrick Morgan, David Askenazi, Katherine McKinney, and Catherine York for their feedback and suggestions for this paper, and Maria Elkin, Laura Pratt, Brandon Tensley, and Alison Yost for their communication and editorial work. We are grateful to the individuals in Philadelphia who spoke with us. We would also like to thank the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation for its generous support of this work, and for approaching us with this project. The views expressed in this report are those of its authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation. newamerica.org/political-reform/reports/where-residents-politics-and-government-meet/ 2 About the Author(s) About New America Chayenne Polimédio is the Deputy Director of the We are dedicated to renewing America by continuing Political Reform program. She coordinates all aspects the quest to realize our nation’s highest ideals, of the program’s work, and manages an independent honestly confronting the challenges caused by rapid portfolio of research and writing on issues related to technological and social change, and seizing the representation and participation, as well as about opportunities those changes create. Brazilian politics and identity. Prior to working at New America, she was a Junior Fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace in D.C.