THE CHAOTIC DOMESTIC: TRACING AFFECT in REPRESENTATIONS of NATION, CLASS, and GENDER in EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY LABORING- CLASS WOMEN’S WRITING Kelly J

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

THE CHAOTIC DOMESTIC: TRACING AFFECT in REPRESENTATIONS of NATION, CLASS, and GENDER in EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY LABORING- CLASS WOMEN’S WRITING Kelly J University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository English Language and Literature ETDs Electronic Theses and Dissertations Summer 7-14-2019 THE CHAOTIC DOMESTIC: TRACING AFFECT IN REPRESENTATIONS OF NATION, CLASS, AND GENDER IN EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY LABORING- CLASS WOMEN’S WRITING Kelly J. Hunnings University of New Mexico - Main Campus Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/engl_etds Part of the English Language and Literature Commons Recommended Citation Hunnings, Kelly J.. "THE CHAOTIC DOMESTIC: TRACING AFFECT IN REPRESENTATIONS OF NATION, CLASS, AND GENDER IN EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY LABORING-CLASS WOMEN’S WRITING." (2019). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/engl_etds/273 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Electronic Theses and Dissertations at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in English Language and Literature ETDs by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. i Kelly J. Hunnings Candidate English Language and Literature Department This dissertation is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication: Approved by the Dissertation Committee: Dr. Gail Houston, Chairperson Dr. Carolyn Woodward Dr. Pamela Cheek Dr. Donna Landry ii THE CHAOTIC DOMESTIC: TRACING AFFECT IN REPRESENTATIONS OF NATION, CLASS, AND GENDER IN EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY LABORING-CLASS WOMEN’S WRITING BY KELLY J. HUNNINGS B.A., English, Classical Civilizations, East Carolina University, 2011 M.A., English, Southern Illinois University Carbondale, 2013 DISSERTATION Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy English The University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico July, 2019 iii DEDICATION To my parents, Sandra and Larry, who inspired in me an appreciation and understanding of what it is to work diligently and to feel deeply; to my sister, Rachel, for her kindness and spirited energy. Last, but certainly not least, to my husband, Aidan, who continually offers unwavering support, while also gently reminding me to have fun. iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to thank my committee members, Dr. Carolyn Woodward, Dr. Donna Landry, and Dr. Pamela Cheek, for generously sharing their knowledge and time on this project. A special thank you to Dr. Gail Turley Houston, the chair of this dissertation, for her constant support and encouragement. I also want to recognize several organizations that funded my research, including the American Society of Eighteenth Century Studies (ASECS) for funding research at McGill University, the National Library of Ireland, and Trinity College Dublin. v THE CHAOTIC DOMESTIC: TRACING AFFECT IN REPRESENTATIONS OF NATION, CLASS, AND GENDER IN EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY LABORING- CLASS WOMEN’S WRITING by Kelly J. Hunnings B.A., ENGLISH & CLASSICAL CIVILZATIONS, EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY, 2011 M.A., ENGLISH, SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY CARBONDALE, 2013 PH.D., ENGLISH, THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO, 2019 ABSTRACT My dissertation traces a term I call the “chaotic domestic” in the writing of a collection of eighteenth-century women laboring-class writers: Mary Barber, Mary Collier, Mary Leapor, Ann Yearsley, and Janet Little. The chaotic domestic in the hands of these writers is multi-layered and affect-driven, focusing as they do on issues regarding nation, class, and gender. As both a poetic trope and the seeming natural and dynamic state of the domestic sphere, the image of the domestic that this set of writers represents and defines is turbulent, unruly, and one that deals with the tangled web of local and global, public and private, gendered and classist identity politics. Most importantly, I seek to demonstrate how the chaotic domestic serves as something these writers do to subvert class and gender systems that affect their public and private lives. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 CHAPTER 1 ..................................................................................................................... 25 CHAPTER 2 ..................................................................................................................... 63 CHAPTER 3 ..................................................................................................................... 95 CHAPTER 4 ................................................................................................................... 128 CHAPTER 5 ................................................................................................................... 158 WORKS CITED ............................................................................................................ 189 1 Introduction “Affective atmospheres are shared, not solitary, and bodies are continuously busy judging their environments and responding to the atmospheres in which they find themselves." —Lauren Berlant, Cruel Optimism pg. 15 Nétwork. n.s [net and work] Any thing reticulated or decussated, at equal distances, with interstices between the intersections. —Samuel Johnson, Dictionary of the English Language (1785) William J. Christmas observes that “the eighteenth century was the first period in English literary history to see the ranks of published plebeian poets increase dramatically” (17). For this project, I define laboring-class or “unlettered” poets as those who were self-taught, assisted, and financially supported by a literary patron (Christmas 40-1).1 In particular, this project focuses on a network of poets linked through their shared use of what I term a “chaotic domestic,” which I theorize and define below. The writers I include are: (1) Dublin’s Mary Barber, a self-taught merchant’s wife who was by no means wealthy, but also not a domestic servant; (2) Hampshire’s Mary Collier, who most notably wrote A Woman’s Labour in response to Stephen Duck’s A Thresher’s Labour and became the model on whom many laboring-class women based their poetry; (3) Northampton’s Mary Leapor, a domestic servant perhaps best known now for her poem, “Crumble Hall.” Later in the century there are (4) Bristol’s Ann Yearsley, whose 1 Because more of the poets I discuss are laboring class than not, and because I am responding to an already strong scholarly tradition, I will continue to use the term “laboring class” to describe the writers, movement, and style of writing outlined here in this project. For ease, the category of “self-taught” is used interchangeably with the term “laboring class.” 2 infamous dealings with her patron Hannah More have dominated twentieth century scholarly discussion of her work, and (5) Ecclefechan, Scotland’s Janet Little, who would be inspired by the work of Collier, Leapor, and Barber in the development of her own poetic responses to Robert Burns. Their writing spans nearly a century, from 1734 to 1792, and represents three nations, England, Ireland, and Scotland. In the rest of this introduction, I focus on outlining the reasons for seeing these writers as in a network even though spatially and temporally their paths never crossed. In reconfiguring traditional definitions of the domestic, we might begin by analyzing important definitions of the term itself. Beginning with the terminology used in the eighteenth century, and a foundation for definitions since, we should look at Samuel Johnson’s Dictionary, which underlines how the writers I analyze fit and do not fit the culture’s idea of the domestic. He suggests four definitions of “DOME’STICAL. DOME’STICK. [adj]”:1) Belonging to the house; not relating to things publick; 2) Private; done at home; not open; 3) Inhabiting the house; not wild; 4) Not foreign; intestine.” Surprisingly, in The Secret History of Domesticity: Public, Private, and the Division of Knowledge (2006), Michael McKeon defines the domestic not unlike Johnson, with a focus on the physical sites it entails, the home, the kitchen, and spaces that are interior, traditionally feminine, and private (436-7). What is more surprising is what neither of these writers includes. Reviewing these two definitions, it is important to note that neither writer allows room, to use a pun, for any disruptions that naturally occur in the domestic setting. Thus, these definitions do not acknowledge the hidden labor necessary to maintain order, or the daily living practices that constantly disrupt order. Indeed, they do not use “domestic” as a noun describing a servant. Hence, these 3 definitions are completely based upon and avoid the mention of the labor needed to keep the domestic domesticated. Here, again, the laborer is made invisible. In my definition of the domestic, what becomes most important is to identify laboring-class persons; I define them as people hired to help with cleaning and other tasks relating to the home. Further, I also frequently turn to alternate, adjectival definitions of the domestic: the domestic as that which refers to the actions within one’s own nation— similar to Johnson’s fourth definition, “not foreign”—and the domestic as that which is related to the running of a home or family relations. In any sense, the domestic here functions as a practical space. What I examine is how fluid this space and position is based on the female laborers’ responsibility for and lack of ownership of this site and position. I also pay attention to the other labor the women in this network shared, which was not only that they were domestic laborers—they were also
Recommended publications
  • FELLERS-DISSERTATION-2013.Pdf (819.7Kb)
    A STUDY IN CONTRASTS: MARY COLLIER AND MARY LEAPOR’S DIVERSE CONTRIBUTIONS TO EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY BRITISH LABORING-CLASS WOMEN’S POETRY _________________ A Dissertation Presented to The Faculty of the Department of English University of Houston _________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy _________________ By Kathy G. Fellers August, 2013 A STUDY IN CONTRASTS: MARY COLLIER AND MARY LEAPOR’S DIVERSE CONTRIBUTIONS TO EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY BRITISH LABORING-CLASS WOMEN’S POETRY _________________ An Abstract of a Dissertation Presented to The Faculty of the Department of English University of Houston _________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy _________________ By Kathy G. Fellers August, 2013 ABSTRACT Mary Collier and Mary Leapor (two of the first laboring-class female authors) share many characteristics, least of which is their desire to be writers and to depict and comment on gender and class dynamics more accurately than had been done before. This artistic focus on “the gap between the ideal and the real” (Messenger 172-174) is partly rooted in the mode of satire where writers create irony by contrasting more realistic images or situations with idealized ones (often implicitly). Part of satire’s purpose is amusement, but equally important is its social critique. Hence, Collier and Leapor are very much writers of their age, yet while they both reflect the writing impulses of the eighteenth-century, they draw from a mixture of different writing traditions. Moreover, their differing economic, creative, and educational circumstances make for significant differences in their writing, despite their common laboring-class backgrounds.
    [Show full text]
  • Area 5: Restoration and 18Th-Century British Literature Primary Texts 1) Drama William Wycherley, the Country Wife (1675) Aphra
    Area 5: Restoration and 18th-Century British Literature Primary Texts 1) Drama William Wycherley, The Country Wife (1675) Aphra Behn, The Rover (1677) John Dryden, All for Love (1677) Thomas Otway, Venice Preserved (1682) William Congreve, The Way of the World (1700) Richard Steele, The Conscious Lovers (1722) John Gay, The Beggar’s Opera (1728) George Lillo, The London Merchant (1731) Oliver Goldsmith, She Stoops to Conquer (1773) or Richard Brinsley Sheridan, The School For Scandal (1777) Frances Burney, The Witlings (1778-1780) 2) Verse John Dryden, “Astraea Redux” (1660); “To my Honored Friend, Dr. Charleton...” (1663); Annus Mirabilis (1667); “Absalom and Achitophel” (1681); “Mac Flecknoe” (1684); “To the Pious Memory of . Anne Killigrew” (1685); “A Song for St. Cecilia’s Day” (1687) John Wilmot, Earl of Rochester, “A Satire Against Reason and Mankind” (1679); “The Imperfect Enjoyment”; “The Disabled Debauchee”; “A Ramble in St. James Park” (1680) Aphra Behn, “The Disappointment” (1680); “The Golden Age”; “On Her Loving Two Equally” (1684),“To the Fair Clarinda”; “On Desire” (1688) Daniel Defoe, The True-Born Englishman [selections from Part I and Part II] (1700) Anne Finch, Countess of Winchilsea, “The Spleen” (1701); “A Nocturnal Reverie”; “To the Nightingale” (1713) Mary, Lady Chudleigh, “To the Ladies”; “To Almystrea” (1703) Alexander Pope, An Essay on Criticism (1709); “Windsor Forest” (1713); “The Rape of the Lock”; “Eloisa to Abelard”; “Epistle to Miss Blount” (1717); An Essay on Man (1733), “An Epistle from Mr. Pope to Dr. Arbuthnot”; “Epistle 2. To a Lady” (1735), The Dunciad in Four Books [cf. 1728 ed. in 3Books] (1743) Jonathan Swift, “A Description of a City Shower” (1710); “On Stella’s Birth-Day 1719”, “Stella’s Birth-Day 1727” (1728); “Verses on the Death of Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • John Clare Society Journal, No.8 (1989)
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Nottingham Trent Institutional Repository (IRep) John Clare Society Journal, No.8 (1989) Some Predecessors of Clare: ‘Honest Duck’ John A. Goodridge The Memorial in Helpston commemorates John Clare as ‘The Northamptonshire Peasant Poet’. This label was attached to Clare from the start of his literary career, and it had important effects both on his life and on the critical reception of his work. This article inaugurates a series looking at the history of ‘peasant poets’, from their emergence in the 1730’s through to self-educated writers in Victorian times. Here, I will be examining the life and work of Stephen Duck, the first ‘peasant poet’ to obtain widespread literary recognition. The idea of a ‘Peasant Poet’, an uneducated, lower-class, rural figure who, through either a sort of miracle, or sheer hard work, becomes a poet, became current in the early Eighteenth Century. A number of cultural and social needs found expression in it. In particular, writers and critics of the period looked for ways to enliven pastoral poetry, which had become moribund. To have a real ‘swain’ writing pastoral poetry (rather than the usual convention, in which the poet pretends to be a swain) was one way of doing this, and in this respect the ‘peasant poet’ was a novelty. In addition, the ‘miracle’ of an uneducated poet excited those such as Joseph Spence, Professor of Poetry at Oxford, who were interested by the Addisonian idea of ‘Natural Genius’. Others still were attracted by the idea of someone from the lower classes pulling himself up by his bootstraps: such a figure was potentially a moral example to others of what could be achieved by hard work, and could be conveniently and inexpensively cultivated as such by his patrons.
    [Show full text]
  • Reflections on Poetry & Social Class
    The Stamp of Class: Reflections on Poetry and Social Class Gary Lenhart http://www.press.umich.edu/titleDetailLookInside.do?id=104886 The University of Michigan Press, 2005. The “Uneducated Poets” Stephen Duck and Ann Yearsley In 1732, a London bookseller published an unauthorized vol- ume of poems to which he gave the title, Poems on several sub- jects/written by Stephen Duck, lately a poor thresher in a barn, in the county of Wilts, at the wages of four shillings and six-pence per week:; which were publickly read in the drawing-room at Windsor Castle, on Friday the 11th of September, 1730, to Her Majesty: who was there- upon most graciously pleased to take the author into her royal protec- tion, by allotting him a salary of thirty pounds per annum, and a small house in Richmond in Surrey to live in, for the better support of him- self and family. The pensioned Duck complained about the piracy; he would have liked an opportunity to further revise the poems before publication. In 1831, Robert Southey, then English poet laureate, pub- lished an introduction to a volume of “Attempts in Verse by an Old Servant,” John Jones. This introduction was later expanded and published separately as The Lives and Works of the Uneducated Poets, with an eight-page list of subscribers consisting mostly of nobles and clerics. Among Southey’s uneducated poets were the Thames waterman John Taylor; shoemaker James Woodhouse; 8 The Stamp of Class: Reflections on Poetry and Social Class Gary Lenhart http://www.press.umich.edu/titleDetailLookInside.do?id=104886 The University of Michigan Press, 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • Excavating the Obscure: Labouring Women, Their Writing, and Eighteenth-Century England by Carmen Bertrand a Thesis Submitted In
    Excavating the Obscure: Labouring Women, their Writing, and Eighteenth-Century England by Carmen Bertrand A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts (MA) in Humanities The Faculty of Graduate Studies Laurentian University Sudbury, Ontario, Canada © Carmen Bertrand, 2018 THESIS DEFENCE COMMITTEE/COMITÉ DE SOUTENANCE DE THÈSE Laurentian Université/Université Laurentienne Faculty of Graduate Studies/Faculté des études supérieures Title of Thesis Titre de la thèse Excavating the Obscure: Labouring Women, their Writing, and Eighteenth-Century England Name of Candidate Nom du candidat Bertrand, Carmen Degree Diplôme Master of Arts Department/Program Date of Defence Département/Programme Humanities Date de la soutenance November 23, 2017 APPROVED/APPROUVÉ Thesis Examiners/Examinateurs de thèse: Dr. Susan Paterson Glover (Supervisor/Directeur(trice) de thèse) Dr. Mrinalini Greedharry (Committee member/Membre du comité) Dr. Sara Burke (Committee member/Membre du comité) Approved for the Faculty of Graduate Studies Approuvé pour la Faculté des études supérieures Dr. David Lesbarrères Monsieur David Lesbarrères Professor Chantel Lavoie Dean, Faculty of Graduate Studies (External Examiner/Examinateur externe) Doyen, Faculté des études supérieures ACCESSIBILITY CLAUSE AND PERMISSION TO USE I, Carmen Bertrand, hereby grant to Laurentian University and/or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or for the duration of my copyright ownership. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also reserve the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.
    [Show full text]
  • LADIES-IN-WAITING: Art, Sex and Politics at the Early Georgian Court
    LADIES-IN-WAITING: Art, Sex and Politics at the early Georgian Court By Eric Jonathan Weichel A thesis submitted to the Department of Art in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Queen’s University Kingston, Ontario, Canada (April 2013) Copyright © Eric Jonathan Weichel, 2013. i Abstract This thesis discusses the cultural contributions – artistic patronage, art theory, art satire - of four Ladies-in-Waiting employed at the early eighteenth-century century British court: Mary, Countess Cowper; Charlotte Clayton, Baroness Sundon; Henrietta Howard, Countess of Suffolk; and Mary Hervey, Baroness Hervey of Ickworth. Through a close reading of archival manuscripts, published correspondences and art historical treatises, I explore the cultural milieu, historical legacy and historiographic reception of these individuals. I argue that their writing reveals fresh insight on the switch from Baroque to Rococo modes of portraiture in Britain, as it does critical attitudes to sex, religion and politics among aristocratic women. Through the use of satire, these courtiers comment on extramarital affairs, rape, homosexuality and divorce among their peer group. They also show an interest in issues of feminist education, literature, political and religious patronage, and contemporary news events, which they reference through allusions to painting, architecture, sculpture, engravings, ceramics, textiles and book illustrations. Many of the artists patronized by the court in this period were foreign-born, peripatetic, and stylistically unusual. Partly due to the transnational nature of these artist’s careers, and partly due to the reluctance of later historians to admit the extent of foreign socio-cultural influence, biased judgements about the quality of these émigré painters’ work continue to predominate in art historical scholarship.
    [Show full text]
  • Love and Loyal Actions': Ritual Affect and Royal Authority, 1688-1760
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 2017 Love and Loyal Actions': Ritual Affect and Royal Authority, 1688-1760 Amy Oberlin Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Oberlin, Amy, "Love and Loyal Actions': Ritual Affect and Royal Authority, 1688-1760" (2017). Dissertations. 2835. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss/2835 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Copyright © 2017 Amy Oberlin LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO "LOVE AND LOYAL ACTIONS": RITUAL AFFECT AND ROYAL AUTHORITY, 1688-1760 A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY PROGRAM IN HISTORY BY AMY B. OBERLIN CHICAGO, IL AUGUST 2017 Copyright by Amy Oberlin, 2017 All rights reserved. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This project would not have been possible without the support and encouragement of a large number of people. My dissertation supervisor, Robert Bucholz, took me on as his student shortly after I entered the Ph.D. program in 2010. However, his influence and inspiration in my life began at the very start of my graduate studies when I took his Early Modern England class as a new graduate student studying for my Master's degree in medieval history. His passion for his topic reignited my own interest in the period. His kindness and dedication to all of his students was evident and inspiring from the beginning.
    [Show full text]
  • Eighteenth Century Labouring-Class Writing
    Published on Great Writers Inspire (http://writersinspire.org) Home > Eighteenth century labouring-class writing Eighteenth century labouring-class writing By Jennifer Batt In 1758, Samuel Johnson noted that the itch of scribbling had seized the nation. 'The rage of writing has seized the old and young' across all segments of society, he observed, so that now 'the cook warbles her lyrics in the kitchen, and the thrasher vociferates his heroics in the barn.' Johnson's observation drew attention to an important development in the eighteenth century literary world: the emergence of the labouring class writer. Over the course of the century increasing numbers of agricultural labourers, household servants, bricklayers, shoemakers, milkmaids, soldiers and sailors not only tool up writing, but also published their work, and, in some cases, made a significant impact on contemporary literary culture. Would-be authors from labouring-class backgrounds faced a particular set of challenges as they attempted to fashion themselves as writers, ranging from accessing education and books, juggling writing with work, managing their literary ambitions, and dealing with success or failure. Education The first challenge faced by labouring-class writers was acquiring a suitable education. Taught to read and write by their parents or at a local school, their formal education was often brought to an abrupt end at a young age. James Woodhouse, the shoemaker-poet, for example, was withdrawn from his school at the age of seven, while many others were sent to work by their early teens. Even when schooling lasted until the teenage years, these writers then faced the challenge of acquiring 'literary' books, from which they could start to explore what poetry was, what it might do, and how it was to be written.
    [Show full text]
  • Jonathan Swift - Poems
    Classic Poetry Series Jonathan Swift - poems - Publication Date: 2012 Publisher: Poemhunter.com - The World's Poetry Archive Jonathan Swift(30 November 1667 – 19 October 1745) Jonathan Swift was an Anglo-Irish satirist, essayist, political pamphleteer (first for the Whigs, then for the Tories), poet and cleric who became Dean of St. Patrick's Cathedral, Dublin. He is remembered for works such as Gulliver's Travels, A Modest Proposal, A Journal to Stella, Drapier's Letters, The Battle of the Books, An Argument Against Abolishing Christianity, and A Tale of a Tub. Swift is probably the foremost prose satirist in the English language, and is less well known for his poetry. Swift originally published all of his works under pseudonyms—such as Lemuel Gulliver, Isaac Bickerstaff, M.B. Drapier—or anonymously. He is also known for being a master of two styles of satire: the Horatian and Juvenalian styles. <b>Biography</b> Jonathan Swift was born in Dublin, Ireland. He was the second child and only son of Jonathan Swift (1640-1667) and his wife Abigail Erick (or Herrick), of Frisby- on-the-Wreake. His father, a native of Goodrich, Herefordshire, accompanied his brothers to Ireland to seek their fortunes in law after their Royalist father's estate was brought to ruin during the English Civil War. Swift's father died at Dublin before he was born, and his mother returned to England. He was left in the care of his influential uncle, Godwin, a close friend and confidante of Sir John Temple, whose son later employed Swift as his secretary.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenges to the Pastoral Ideal in Three Eighteenth-Century Poems
    ''WEARY OF THE PIPE OF TITYRUS'': CHALLENGES TO TIIE PASTORAL IDEAL IN THREE EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY POEMS ''WEARY OF TIIE PIPE OF TITYRUS'': CHALLENGES TO TTIE PASTORAL IDEAL IN THREE EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY POEMS By SIffiRRY MARIE DOYLE, B.A.(Hons.) A Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies In Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts McMaster University @ Copyright by Sherry Marie Doyle, September 1993 IcMASTER UNIVFRSITY IIBRARY MASTER OF ARTS (1993) McMASTER UNIVERSITY (English) Hamilton. Ontario TITLE: "'Weary of the Pipe of Titynrs": Challenges to the Pastorai Ideal in Three Eighteenth-Century Poems AUTHOR: Sherry Marie DoYle B.A. (Hons.) (Memorial University of Newfoundland) SUPERVISOR: Professor Richard Morton NUMBER OF PAGES: v, 100 11 ABSTRACT This thesis examines three poems, all of which challenged the prevailing tendency to idealize rural life in eighteenth-century poetry. Stephen Duck's The Thresher's Labour offers an account of rural life from the perspective of a thresher, and the "speaker" uses his unique perspective to demolish the pastoral myth that rural life was a life of ease and leisure. Oliver Goldsmith's The Deserted Villase contrasts an idealized version of the past with the intolerable present in order to emphasis the transformed natqre of country life, as well as to critique the forces which caused the transformation. His gloomy account of contemporary village life challenges the deeply-rooted tendency to envision the countryside as an immutable retreat from urban corruption. George Crabbe's The Village attacks the pastoral tradition and the tendency to sentimentalize the plight of the poor by offering a harsh, unsentimental account of village life.
    [Show full text]
  • Alexander Thistlethwayte's Books in Winchester College Fellows' Library
    THE LEGACY OF AN EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY GENTLEMAN: ALEXANDER THISTLETHWAYTE’S BOOKS IN WINCHESTER COLLEGE FELLOWS’ LIBRARY by CARLY EMMA WATSON A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of English School of English, Drama and American & Canadian Studies College of Arts and Law University of Birmingham November 2013 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT This thesis investigates the donation of books made by Alexander Thistlethwayte (?1718– 1771), a Hampshire grandee and bibliophile, to the Fellows’ Library of Winchester College, the oldest of the English public schools. The first two chapters demonstrate the largely untapped potential of two unique books in the Thistlethwayte benefaction to advance scholarly understanding of topics relating to the copying and transmission of early modern literary texts. The second part of the thesis examines the collecting habits which shaped the physical configuration of Thistlethwayte’s books and the contents of his library. Chapter Three rediscovers the role of the anthology in late seventeenth- and eighteenth-century cultures of compilation, through a comparison of Sammelbände assembled by Thistlethwayte with those that he acquired from an Oxford graduate of the 1690s.
    [Show full text]
  • 185 'Poetry, Painting and Gardening, Or the Science of Landscape, Will
    185 ‘Poetry, Painting and Gardening, or the Science of Landscape, will forever by men of taste be deemed Three Sisters, or the Three Graces who dress and Adorn Nature’. (Horace Walpole)1 A comparative study of Lady Hertford’s grotto at Marlborough and William Kent’s illustration of Spring in James Thomson's The Seasons. Richard D A Lamont Abstract: in a reading of William Kent’s illustration of Spring in James Thomson's The Seasons (1730), this essay offers an interpretation which connects the artefact with Lady Hertford’s grotto in Marlborough, Wiltshire, designed and constructed between 1725 and 1735. This essay examines both the shared landscapes, contexts and oppositions of the two artefacts and shall illustrate the interconnectivity and significant developments between poetry, painting and gardening in the 1720s - with Lady Hertford as patron, muse and innovator. ___________________________________________________________________________ John Millan and Andrew Millar, two London-based booksellers and publishers, recommended to the poet James Thomson (1700-1748) that his 1728 edition of Spring should contain a ‘Proposal for printing by subscription The Four Seasons’, and should advertise that it would be ‘printed in one Volume in Quarto, on a Superfine Royal Paper, and with Copper- Plates adapted to the Subject’.2 This one guinea subscription edition included four full page frontispieces, in baroque style, designed by William Kent (c.1685-1748) - which were also available for purchase – and was engraved by Nicolas-Henry Tardieu (1674-1749); it was published between 6th and 10th June, 1730.3 Kent’s frontispiece presents Spring, personified as a celestial being, forming a circle hand in hand with putti and other deities, and suspended on clouds above an unidentified landscape.
    [Show full text]