Love and Loyal Actions': Ritual Affect and Royal Authority, 1688-1760

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Love and Loyal Actions': Ritual Affect and Royal Authority, 1688-1760 Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 2017 Love and Loyal Actions': Ritual Affect and Royal Authority, 1688-1760 Amy Oberlin Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Oberlin, Amy, "Love and Loyal Actions': Ritual Affect and Royal Authority, 1688-1760" (2017). Dissertations. 2835. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss/2835 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Copyright © 2017 Amy Oberlin LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO "LOVE AND LOYAL ACTIONS": RITUAL AFFECT AND ROYAL AUTHORITY, 1688-1760 A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY PROGRAM IN HISTORY BY AMY B. OBERLIN CHICAGO, IL AUGUST 2017 Copyright by Amy Oberlin, 2017 All rights reserved. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This project would not have been possible without the support and encouragement of a large number of people. My dissertation supervisor, Robert Bucholz, took me on as his student shortly after I entered the Ph.D. program in 2010. However, his influence and inspiration in my life began at the very start of my graduate studies when I took his Early Modern England class as a new graduate student studying for my Master's degree in medieval history. His passion for his topic reignited my own interest in the period. His kindness and dedication to all of his students was evident and inspiring from the beginning. I could seriously write an entire essay on what this generous and brilliant man has meant in my life. He has been a demanding but kind mentor, and, whether he intended to or not, a life coach. He is the exemplar of a diligent, dedicated and brilliant scholar, as well as a kind and patient person. In short, he is a model human being and I am more grateful than I can express that he agreed to be my mentor. Professor John Donoghue's dedication to his own work and the role of history in furthering social justice in broader society should serve as an inspiration to all aspiring historians. I am proud to have him on my committee and grateful for his input in this project - and the copious amounts of cheerleading he has provided over the course of my graduate career. iii I also want to thank Ellen McClure for agreeing to serve on my committee, even though I ended up abandoning the French portion of the research, which I imagine interested her most. Her input will be invaluable as I endeavor to turn this dissertation into a book. The History Department at Loyola certainly has some amazing professors, who apparently attract some of the most wonderful students, many of whom have also contributed to this project over the years. There are too many to name here, so I'll start by thanking all of my fellow graduate students with whom I've had the pleasure of discussing classes, hashing through research or venting about schedules. Dr. Thomas Green took me under his wing when I was a rookie M.A. student, who had no idea what I was getting into. Over the years he provided support and mentorship as I navigated the often alien landscape of graduate study. I can't thank him enough for both his guidance and his friendship. Dr. Andrew Donnelly has also been a wonderfully supportive friend throughout my graduate career. I want to thank Dr. Steven Catania, my fellow Bucholz-mentee, for the many discussions of our research that helped me flush out aspects of this project and for last-minute edits that helped me meet deadlines. Dr. Anthony Di Lorenzo, Dr. Peter Kotowski both organized and participated in the English Atlantic Writing Group, which drew an excellent group of scholars, including Professor Jim Sack and others already mentioned here, and expanded my perspective on my own work and on the field more broadly. Dr. Amelia Serafine, Will Ippen, Katie Macica, Hope Shannon, and all the others who attended the Dissertation Writing Group have been especially patient in reviewing my rough drafts and are wonderfully supportive colleagues and friends. Last, but certainly not least, is Dr. Erin Feichtinger, whose energy and passion is contagious. From our 2014 research trip to London to this very moment when she is helping me format this dissertation so that I don't curse myself sick, Erin has been a wonderful colleague, editor, drinking buddy and friend. She is iv brilliant, generous and kind. If you are fortunate enough to call her friend, you are one lucky bastard. But fortune has certainly blessed you, if you have had the opportunity to perform The Rocky Horror Picture Show with her in your living room. Despite the support of all my wonderful colleagues and friends, a dissertation does not get written on beer and sympathy alone. I want to thank Loyola University for providing me with both fellowships and teaching opportunities to help me meet the monetary demands of adult life, while pursuing my studies. For those times when such support was not possible, I had the great luck of working part-time with a wonderful team at Kroll Associates, Inc. I am especially grateful to Mark Skertic, Jeff Cramer, Lisa Silverman, Stephanie Gardner, Baltazar Vallenilla, Aneta Olszynska, Rachel Robinson and Margot Klepetko for their understanding and support over the years, not to mention their patience with my ever-varying schedules and vast leaves of absence. Finally and most importantly, the person who has undoubtedly borne the brunt of the ups and downs that led to this project is my best friend and partner, Rob Patterson. He has listened to every presentation, every awkward sentence, every half-formed theory and absolutely every single anxiety. He has toasted my achievements and provided a shoulder to cry on. He is the love of my life, and without his love and support, completing this dissertation would have been utterly impossible. v TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS iii LIST OF FIGURES vii CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION: MONARCHS, PUBLICS 1 AND EMOTIONS, 1660-1760 CHAPTER TWO: "SPRINGS OF EACH VIRTUOUS ACTION": 27 PASSIONS AND PIETY IN EARLY EIGHTEENTH CENTURY ENGLAND CHAPTER THREE: "SHARE WITH ME IN MY GRIEF AND 70 AFFLICTION": ROYAL DEATH AND PUBLIC MOURNING CHAPTER FOUR: "A KIND OF MARRIAGE DAY": 119 ACCESSION, CORONATION AND AFFECTIVE UNITY CHAPTER FIVE: ROYAL MARRIAGE IN THE SEVENTEENTH 164 AND EIGHTEENTH CENTURIES CHAPTER SIX: CONCLUSION 209 BIBLIOGRAPHY 213 VITA 232 vi LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Hibernia in Universal Mourning 118 Figure 2: William Kent, The Wedding of Princess Anne 208 vii CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION MONARCHS, PUBLICS AND EMOTIONS: 1660-1760 This project began with the intent to discover a more precise measurement of the eighteenth-century court's place in the social and cultural shifts of the eighteenth century. Inspired in part by the dominance that emotions have come to wield over modern U.S. politics, I use emotions as a litmus. Through modern news outlets and social media, modern politicians in the U.S. and elsewhere have become master emotional manipulators - at least the successful ones have.1 People were no less gullible in the eighteenth century, but the communication apparatus was far less developed. The explosion of print culture, however, created a new and ever- expanding means through which the monarchy could communicate with the public. This project seeks to understand how the last Stuart and first Hanoverian monarchs, who reigned during the proliferation of print in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, employed this new mode of communication to influence hearts and minds. The story of the British monarchy, especially during this period, is one of change versus continuity. From 1660 to 1760, monarchs and their courts navigated changing political and social circumstances while attempting to maintain the illusion of continuity. This period was a rollercoaster of dynastic change. In 1660, Charles II returned to the throne with much fanfare, following an interregnum of Parliamentary rule. He died in 1685, having produced no legitimate 1 See, Drew Westin, The Political Brain: The Role of Emotion in Deciding the Fate of a Nation (New York, NY: PublicAffairs, 2007). 1 2 children, so the crown went to his brother James II. James was openly Catholic and his rule was hotly contested.2 In 1688, James' Catholic wife gave birth to a son and rumors swirled that the child was not Mary's, but had been smuggled into the queen's bedroom in a warming pan.3 This, in addition to James' insistence on toleration for Catholics, motivated some members of Parliament to invite the Dutch husband of James' elder daughter Mary to come to England's aid. In late 1688, William III arrived in England with Dutch military support. James sent his wife away and then fled himself in December 1688. Two months later, in February 1688/9, Parliament declared William and Mary king and queen of England.4 Because they had been appointed by Parliament, William and Mary relinquished some of the crown's power, agreeing to a new coronation oath that recognized the power of Parliament.5 Mary died in 1694, and her husband followed in 1701/2, leaving the throne to Mary's younger sister, Anne. Before William died, however, he signed the Act of Succession (1701), which ensured a Protestant succession to the crown. This barred the exiled James Stuart, the infant of the warming pan, from ascending the throne. When Queen Anne died in 1714 leaving no surviving children, her cousin, the 2 On the Exclusion Crisis, see: Mark Knights, Politics and Opinion in Crisis, 1678-1681 (Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 2006); Melinda S.
Recommended publications
  • Les Rois Thaumaturges
    Les Rois Tha uma turg es . Étud e su rle Cara ct Ère SURNATUREL At TRIBUE A LA PUISSANCE ROYALE Par ti cu li er eme nt en Fran ce et en Angl e - te rre . By Marc Bloch, Professeur a I’Universite de Strasbourg. En Depot: Librairie Istra, Maison d’Edition, Strasbourg, 15, rue des Juifs, Paris, 57, rue de Richelieu. Humphrey Milford: Oxford University Press, 1924. Professor Bloch has written a most exhaustive and erudite study of the “divinity that doth hedge a king.” As he states, the origins of the conception of mystic powers possessed by royal persons are lost in the obscurity attendant upon the beginnings of most human institutions. Certain it is that from the earliest periods down to a comparatively few centuries ago certain superhuman attributes were ascribed to those hereditary rulers who reigned by divine right. Because the supposed power of healing by the royal touch or other means figured among the origin of the tradition. He states that these, we must by no means allow ourselves to Henry i was most anxious to conciliate his think that the European or English kings whose English subjects. He married an English wife thaumaturgic properties are the special object and was anxious to attach his dynasty in every of study by Professor Bloch were considered possible way to that of the English kings before either by themselves or their subjects in the the Conquest. The most ancient narratives that light of mere sorcerers. Their mystical functions tell of the miraculous cures wrought by Edward were merely an appanage of their office, the the Confessor were written during the reign essential duties of which were to rule their of Henry i, and the official interpretation of the people, administer justice and conduct their cures brought about by the royal touch of affairs in war and peace.
    [Show full text]
  • Handel's Sacred Music
    The Cambridge Companion to HANDEL Edited byD oNAtD BURROWS Professor of Music, The Open University, Milton Keynes CATvTNnIDGE UNTVERSITY PRESS 165 Ha; strings, a 1708 fbr 1l Handel's sacred music extended written to Graydon Beeks quake on sary of th; The m< Jesus rath Handel was involved in the composition of sacred music throughout his strings. Tl career, although it was rarely the focal point of his activities. Only during compositi the brief period in 1702-3 when he was organist for the Cathedral in Cardinal ( Halle did he hold a church job which required regular weekly duties and, one of FIi since the cathedral congregation was Calvinist, these duties did not Several m include composing much (if any) concerted music. Virtually all of his Esther (H\ sacred music was written for specific events and liturgies, and the choice moYemenr of Handel to compose these works was dictated by his connections with The Ror specific patrons. Handel's sacred music falls into groups of works which of Vespers were written for similar forces and occasions, and will be discussed in followed b terms of those groups in this chapter. or feast, ar During his period of study with Zachow in Halle Handel must have followed b written some music for services at the Marktkirche or the Cathedral, but porarl, Ro no examples survive.l His earliest extant work is the F major setting of chanted, br Psalm 113, Laudate pueri (H\41/ 236),2 for solo soprano and strings. The tradition o autograph is on a type of paper that was available in Hamburg, and he up-to-date may have
    [Show full text]
  • FELLERS-DISSERTATION-2013.Pdf (819.7Kb)
    A STUDY IN CONTRASTS: MARY COLLIER AND MARY LEAPOR’S DIVERSE CONTRIBUTIONS TO EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY BRITISH LABORING-CLASS WOMEN’S POETRY _________________ A Dissertation Presented to The Faculty of the Department of English University of Houston _________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy _________________ By Kathy G. Fellers August, 2013 A STUDY IN CONTRASTS: MARY COLLIER AND MARY LEAPOR’S DIVERSE CONTRIBUTIONS TO EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY BRITISH LABORING-CLASS WOMEN’S POETRY _________________ An Abstract of a Dissertation Presented to The Faculty of the Department of English University of Houston _________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy _________________ By Kathy G. Fellers August, 2013 ABSTRACT Mary Collier and Mary Leapor (two of the first laboring-class female authors) share many characteristics, least of which is their desire to be writers and to depict and comment on gender and class dynamics more accurately than had been done before. This artistic focus on “the gap between the ideal and the real” (Messenger 172-174) is partly rooted in the mode of satire where writers create irony by contrasting more realistic images or situations with idealized ones (often implicitly). Part of satire’s purpose is amusement, but equally important is its social critique. Hence, Collier and Leapor are very much writers of their age, yet while they both reflect the writing impulses of the eighteenth-century, they draw from a mixture of different writing traditions. Moreover, their differing economic, creative, and educational circumstances make for significant differences in their writing, despite their common laboring-class backgrounds.
    [Show full text]
  • HENRY VII M.Elizabeth of York (R.1485–1509)
    Historic Royal Places – Descriptors Small Use Width 74mm Wide and less Minimum width to be used 50mm Depth 16.5mm (TOL ) Others Various Icon 7mm Wide Dotted line for scaling Rules 0.25pt and minimum size establishment only. Does not print. HENRY VII m.Elizabeth of York (r.1485–1509) Arthur, m. Katherine HENRY VIII m.(1) Katherine m.(2) Anne m.(3) Jane m.(4) Anne of Cleves Edmund (1) James IV, m Margaret m (2) Archibald Douglas, Elizabeth Mary Catherine Prince of Wales of Aragon* (r.1509–47) Boleyn Seymour (5) Catherine Howard King of Earl of Angus (d. 1502) (6) Kateryn Parr Scotland Frances Philip II, m. MARY I ELIZABETH I EDWARD VI Mary of m. James V, Margaret m. Matthew Stewart, Lady Jane Grey King of Spain (r.1553–58) (r.1558–1603) (r.1547–53) Lorraine King of Earl of Lennox (r.1553 for 9 days) Scotland (1) Francis II, m . Mary Queen of Scots m. (2) Henry, Charles, Earl of Lennox King of France Lord Darnley Arbella James I m. Anne of Denmark (VI Scotland r.1567–1625) (I England r.1603–1625) Henry (d.1612) CHARLES I (r.1625–49) Elizabeth m. Frederick, Elector Palatine m. Henrietta Maria CHARLES II (r.1660–85) Mary m. William II, (1) Anne Hyde m. JAMES II m. (2) Mary Beatrice of Modena Sophia m. Ernest Augustus, Elector of Hanover m.Catherine of Braganza Prince of Orange (r.1685–88) WILLIAM III m. MARY II (r.1689–94) ANNE (r.1702–14) James Edward, GEORGE I (r.1714–27) Other issue Prince of Orange m.
    [Show full text]
  • John Darby and the Whig Canon
    JOHN DARBY AND THE WHIG CANON I A celebrated series of books by the English commonwealthmen of the seventeenth century was published between 1698 and 1700. The series included major editions of works by John Milton, Algernon Sidney, and James Harrington, and the civil war memoirs of Edmund Ludlow, Denzil Holles, John Berkeley, and Thomas Fairfax. Collectively these texts have become known as the ‘whig canon’.1 Over the following century this set of writings would profoundly shape the development of republican thought on both sides of the Atlantic.2 The texts of the whig canon would be cited approvingly by thinkers as diverse as Bolingbroke and the founding fathers of the American constitution.3 At their original moment of publication, however, the series was designed to bolster opposition to the consolidation of power by the court whigs under William III. By reasserting ‘true whig’ principles against the corruption of the apostates who made their peace with the court, these historic works were made to chime with the political challenges faced by the opposition in the present moment: attacking the maintenance of standing armies by the state, inveighing against priestcraft, and asserting the primacy of the ancient constitution. 1 Caroline Robbins, The eighteenth-century commonwealthman (Cambridge, MA, 1959), p. 32. 2 J. G. A. Pocock, ‘The varieties of whiggism from exclusion to reform: a history of ideology and discourse’, in Virtue, commerce, and history: essays on political thought and history, chiefly in the eighteenth century (Cambridge, 1985), pp. 215-310; Robbins, Commonwealthman; Blair Worden, Roundhead reputations: the English civil wars and the passions of posterity (London, 2001); Alan Craig Houston, Algernon Sidney and the republican heritage in England and America (Princeton, 1991).
    [Show full text]
  • The Architects of Eighteenth Century English Freemasonry, 1720 – 1740
    The Architects of Eighteenth Century English Freemasonry, 1720 – 1740 Submitted by Richard Andrew Berman to the University of Exeter as a Thesis for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Research in History 15 December 2010. This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis that is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other university. R A Berman 1 | P a g e Abstract Following the appointment of its first aristocratic Grand Masters in the 1720s and in the wake of its connections to the scientific Enlightenment, ‘Free and Accepted’ Masonry rapidly became part of Britain’s national profile and the largest and arguably the most influential of Britain’s extensive clubs and societies. The new organisation did not evolve naturally from the mediaeval guilds and religious orders that pre-dated it, but was reconfigured radically by a largely self-appointed inner core. Freemasonry became a vehicle for the expression and transmission of the political and religious views of those at its centre, and for the scientific Enlightenment concepts that they championed. The ‘Craft’ also offered a channel through which many sought to realise personal aspirations: social, intellectual and financial. Through an examination of relevant primary and secondary documentary evidence, this thesis seeks to contribute to a broader understanding of contemporary English political and social culture, and to explore the manner in which Freemasonry became a mechanism that promoted the interests of the Hanoverian establishment and connected and bound a number of élite metropolitan and provincial figures.
    [Show full text]
  • Steven CA Pincus James A. Robinson Working Pape
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES WHAT REALLY HAPPENED DURING THE GLORIOUS REVOLUTION? Steven C.A. Pincus James A. Robinson Working Paper 17206 http://www.nber.org/papers/w17206 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 July 2011 This paper was written for Douglass North’s 90th Birthday celebration. We would like to thank Doug, Daron Acemoglu, Stanley Engerman, Joel Mokyr and Barry Weingast for their comments and suggestions. We are grateful to Dan Bogart, Julian Hoppit and David Stasavage for providing us with their data and to María Angélica Bautista and Leslie Thiebert for their superb research assistance. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer- reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications. © 2011 by Steven C.A. Pincus and James A. Robinson. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. What Really Happened During the Glorious Revolution? Steven C.A. Pincus and James A. Robinson NBER Working Paper No. 17206 July 2011 JEL No. D78,N13,N43 ABSTRACT The English Glorious Revolution of 1688-89 is one of the most famous instances of ‘institutional’ change in world history which has fascinated scholars because of the role it may have played in creating an environment conducive to making England the first industrial nation.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Southampton Research Repository
    University of Southampton Research Repository Copyright © and Moral Rights for this thesis and, where applicable, any accompanying data are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non- commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis and the accompanying data cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder/s. The content of the thesis and accompanying research data (where applicable) must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holder/s. When referring to this thesis and any accompanying data, full bibliographic details must be given, e.g. Thesis: Katarzyna Kosior (2017) "Becoming and Queen in Early Modern Europe: East and West", University of Southampton, Faculty of the Humanities, History Department, PhD Thesis, 257 pages. University of Southampton FACULTY OF HUMANITIES Becoming a Queen in Early Modern Europe East and West KATARZYNA KOSIOR Doctor of Philosophy in History 2017 ~ 2 ~ UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON ABSTRACT FACULTY OF HUMANITIES History Doctor of Philosophy BECOMING A QUEEN IN EARLY MODERN EUROPE: EAST AND WEST Katarzyna Kosior My thesis approaches sixteenth-century European queenship through an analysis of the ceremonies and rituals accompanying the marriages of Polish and French queens consort: betrothal, wedding, coronation and childbirth. The thesis explores the importance of these events for queens as both a personal and public experience, and questions the existence of distinctly Western and Eastern styles of queenship. A comparative study of ‘Eastern’ and ‘Western’ ceremony in the sixteenth century has never been attempted before and sixteenth- century Polish queens usually do not appear in any collective works about queenship, even those which claim to have a pan-European focus.
    [Show full text]
  • Queen Victoria's Family Tree
    Married Divorced QUEEN VICTORIA’S FAMILY TREE Affair Assassinated Legitimate children Twice in chart Illegitimate children King or Queen Albert, Queen Prince Consort Victoria 1819-1861 1819-1901 Topic of a Bax of Things blog Prince Arthur Princess Alice Prince Alfred Princess Helena Princess Louise Duke of Prince Leopold Princess Beatrice of the United Duke of Saxe- of the United Duchess of Argyll Connaught Duke of Albany of the United Vicky EDWARD VII Kingdom Coburg and Gotha Kingdom and Strathearn Kingdom Princess Royal King of the 1843-1878 1844-1900 1846-1923 1848-1939 1853-1884 1857-1944 United Kingdom 1850-1942 1840-1901 1841-1910 Frederick III Ludwig Maria Prince Christian John Campbell Princess Louise Margaret Princess Helena Prince Henry German Emperor Alexandra GD of Hesse Grand Duchess of Russia of Schleswig-Holstein Duke of Argyll of Prussia of Waldeck and Pyrmont of Battenberg of Denmark 1837-1892 1853-1920 1831-1917 1845-1914 1860-1917 1861-1922 1858-1896 1831-1888 1844-1925 Wilhelm II Prince Princess Victoria Alfred, Hereditary Prince Princess Margaret Princess Alice Alexander Mountbatten German Emperor & Prince Christian Victor Albert Victor of Hesse and by Rhine of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha of Connaught of Albany Marquess of Carisbrooke King of Prussia 1867-1900 1864-1892 1863-1950 1874-1899 1882-1920 1883-1981 1886-1960 1859-1941 1) Princess Augusta of Engaged to Prince Louis Gustav VI Adolf Alexander Cambridge Schleswig-Holstein (1858-1821) Marie Albert, Lady Irene Denison Mary of Teck of Battenberg King of Sweden 1st
    [Show full text]
  • Copyrighted Material
    33_056819 bindex.qxp 11/3/06 11:01 AM Page 363 Index fighting the Vikings, 52–54 • A • as law-giver, 57–58 Aberfan tragedy, 304–305 literary interests, 56–57 Act of Union (1707), 2, 251 reforms of, 54–55 Adelaide of Saxe-Meiningen, queen of reign of, 50, 51–52 William IV, 268, 361 Alfred, son of King Aethelred, king of Áed, king of Scotland, 159 England, 73, 74 Áed Findliath, ruler in Ireland, 159 Ambrosius Aurelianus (Roman leader), 40 Aedán mac Gabráin, overking of Dalriada, 153 Andrew, Prince, Duke of York (son of Aelfflaed, queen of Edward, king Elizabeth II) of Wessex, 59 birth of, 301 Aelfgifu of Northampton, queen of Cnut, 68 as naval officer, 33 Aethelbald, king of Mercia, 45 response to death of Princess Diana, 313 Aethelbert, king of Wessex, 49 separation from Sarah, Duchess of York, Aethelflaed, daughter of Alfred, king of 309 Wessex, 46 Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, 57, 58, 63 Aethelfrith, Saxon king, 43 Anglo-Saxons Aethelred, king of England, 51, 65–66 appointing an heir, 16 Aethelred, king of Mercia, 45, 46, 55 invasion of Britain, 39–41 Aethelred, king of Wessex, 50 kingdoms of, 37, 42 Aethelstan, king of Wessex, 51, 61–62 kings of, 41–42 Aethelwold, son of Aethelred, king of overview, 12 Wessex, 60 Anna, queen of Scotland, 204 Aethelwulf, king of Wessex, 49 Anne, Princess Royal, daughter of Africa, as part of British empire, 14 Elizabeth II, 301, 309 Agincourt, battle of, 136–138 Anne, queen of England Albert, Prince, son of George V, later lack of heir, 17 George VI, 283, 291 marriage to George of Denmark, 360–361 Albert of
    [Show full text]
  • Edmund Burke and the Common Law Tradition Reconsidered
    イギリス哲学研究 第 33 号(2010 年) Edmund Burke and the Common Law Tradition Reconsidered Sora Sato Introduction: John Pocock’s ‘Edmund Burke and the Ancient Constitution’ In The Ancient Constitution and the Feudal Law (first published in 1957, reissued in 1987), J.G.A. Pocock argues: Every one of Burke’s cardinal points, as just enumerated, can be found in Hale rebuking Hobbes, in Coke rebuking James I, or in Davies rebuking the partisans of written law;... From what sources Burke derived it, and with what elements of eighteenth-century thought and his own genius he enriched it, are questions for the specialist; but that Burke’s philosophy is in great measure a revitalization of the concept of custom and the common-law tradition may be safely asserted as part of the present study’s contentions.(1) In his essay entitled ‘Burke and the Ancient Constitution’, (2) Pocock repeats his argument that Burke’s traditionalism should be understood in the context of the common law tradition, and also that Burke was aware of this tradition. At the end of this essay he also writes: in order to explain Burke’s traditionalism, there is no need to suppose more than his continued employment and highly developed understanding of certain concepts which came from the common law (as he [Burke] recognized) and were generally in use * This essay is largely based upon the present author’s MSc dissertation submitted to University of Edinburgh in August 2009. I would like to thank Professors Thomas Ahnert, Harry Dickinson, Tamotsu Nishizawa, Kenji Fujii and two anonymous referees for their valuable comments.
    [Show full text]
  • [Steel ' the Film and W'hatnot
    The Passing Show AMUSEMENTS. AMUSEMENTS. THE EVENING STAR, Washington, D. C. ** I Where and When THURSDAY, APRIL 3. I»V.> A-29 Musketeer | Current Theater Attractions AMUSEMENTS. AMUSEMENTS. Flavor of a Fairy Tale j And Time of Showing STARTS TODAY! Maureen Stage. ““ Caught in 'Royal Journey' Arena “Three Men on a Miss O'Hara Has Horse”; 8:30 p.m. INTRIGUE! ADVENTURE! By Jay Carmody New Gayety “The Cocktail and There is something of fairy tale enchantment woven into the e Fine Sword Hand Party”; 8:30 p.m. atmosphere and texture of 1952 in “Royal Journey,” the new filma Catholic University —"Macbeth”; MURDER!... which opened yesterday at the Dupont. In Keith's Film 8:30 p.m. This gives a singular attractiveness to the vividly photographed “AT SWORD S POINT.” an RKO pic- S produced by Screen. _ lyre, Sid Rogell Uerrold T. story of the visit of Princess’ Brandt i. directed by Lewis Allen, screen- Ambassador “The Greatest They by Fight a FINAL pay Walter Perris and Joseph Hoffman, 1000 WEEK Elizabeth and the Duke of Edin- the Princess at Washington air- -'from story by Aubrey Wissberg Show on Earth”; 1:10, 3:55, 6:40, and Jack ¦ § burgh to Canada and the United port Po'lexfen At Kicth's. land 9:25 p.m. Dangers -1 and the extraordinary en- , fe jHjRr in the Orient’s last Fall. The Cast. States ergy of the news cameramen. 1. D Artagnan Cornel Wilde | Capitol—“Steel Town”; 11 a.m., •Royal Journey,” made by the ‘ Nevertheless, special Maureen O’Hara 1:45, Most Exciting City! it adds its 1 Lavalle Robert Douglas 4:30.
    [Show full text]