Oliver Goldsmith
OLIVER GOLDSMITH THE CRITICAL HERITAGE Edited by G. S. ROUSSEAU London and New York Contents PREFACE pagexvn ACKNOWLEDGMENTS XIX CHRONOLOGICAL TABLE XXi INTRODUCTION I The Traveller, or a Prospect of Society (December 1764) 1 DR JOHNSON, Critical Review, December 1764 29 2 Unsigned notice, Gentleman's Magazine, December 1764 33 3 Unsigned notice, London Chronicle, 18-20 December 1764 34 4 JOHN LANGHORNE, Monthly Review, January 1765 35 The Vicar of Wakefield (27 March 1766) 5 Unsigned notice, Monthly Review, May 1766 44 6 Unsigned review, Critical Review, June 1766 45 7 MME RICCOBONI, in a letter to David Garrick on the plot of The Vicar of Wakefield, 11 September 1766 48 8 LADY SARAH PENNINGTON, ^4« Unfortunate Mother's Advice to Her Absent Daughters, 1767 51 9 FANNY BURNBY compares The Vicar of Wakefield with other sentimental novels, 1768 52 10 Two brief estimates of Goldsmith's novel, 1776, 1785 (a) Unsigned review in Hugh Kelly's Babler, July 1776 54 (b) CLARA REEVE'S estimate of The Vicar of Wakefield in The Progress of Romance, 1785 56 11 MRS JANE WEST commenting on 'criminal conversation* in The Vicar of Wakefield, in Letters to a Young Lady: in which the duties and characters of women are considered . 1806 57 12 EDWARD MANGIN compares Goldsmith and Richardson as novelists in An Essay on Light Reading, 1808 58 13 BYRON comments on Schlegel's estimate of The Vicar of Wakefield, 29 January 1821 62 14 GEORGE ELIOT on story telling and narrative art in The Vicar of Wakefield, in Essays and Leaves from a Notebook, 1884 63 ix CONTENTS 15 HENRY JAMES'S introduction to The Vicar of Wakefield, 1900 65 The Good Natured Man (29 January 1768) 16 Two early reviews of The Good Natured Man, 1768, 1772 (a) Unsigned review, Critical Review, February 1768 70 (b) SIR NICHOLAS NIPCLOSE [pseudonym] commenting on Goldsmith and other theatrical delinquents in 1768, in The Theatres.
[Show full text]